DOCSLIB.ORG

Recording Petroglyphs at the Little Black Mountain Site on the Arizona Strip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recording Petroglyphs at the Little Black Mountain Site on the Arizona Strip Recording Petroglyphs at the -Lit 1ar Mountain at !. on the Arizonn. Strip LT I Shirley Ann Craig and George W. Craig INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to share the manner in which we have recorded the petroglyphs at the Little Black Mountain Rock Art Site. Our goal was to record each glyph in an individual and orderly format. We began by unpacking the panel and then unpacking the components of each glyph. What we have done was done as volunteers and amateurs which leaves room for errors or insufficient background for judgments. Our involvement with this project began in 1988 when we signed a volunteer agreement with the Bureau of Land Management under the direction of archaeologist Rick Malcomson. Rick served as our instructor for the Utah Archaeology Certification Course, advisor for our local chapter of the Utah Statewide Archaeology Society and our guide for this project. NA L • CUL ' • L ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA The site is located approximately eight miles southeast of St. George, Utah, in what is called the "Arizona Strip". Little Black Mountain is a singular monolith rising approximately 550 feet above the desert floor. It is a sandstone mesa topped by a lava flow, sitting alone, surrounded by sand, rocks, and mesquite bushes and enclosed by various mountain and mesa groups: to the east the Hurricane Cliffs rise 5400 feet; to the south the land rises to Seegmiller Mountain at 6020 feet; to the west a range of steeps topped out by Mokaac Mountain; to the north are varying lower hills rising to Pine Mountain at 10,324 feet. The desert floor around Little Black Mountain is 2,870 feet. To design a glyph for this site, I would use a solidly pecked out circle to represent the site itself enclosed by a heavily outlined rim (the encircling hills and mountains). The worked area between the two would represent the desert valley floor. See map (figure 1). The geography of the site may be a clue to its appeal to early man. Navajo Mountain in Utah, Shiprock in New Mexico, San Francisco Peaks in Arizona were, and are, especially significant sites to the Native Americans and these sites also have a highly visible, isolated monolithic formation. Since these factors are also evident at Little Black Mountain as well as the heavily patinated boulders scattered around the southerly and westerly base, they may have contributed to the appeal of the site for rock art recording by many cultures. The only evidences of habitation are several small rock shelters. No sign of any agricultural activity has been found. The nearest probable water source may have been Ft. Pearce Wash which is approximately three miles northeast, and in current times it has some water flow on a sporadic basis. Utah Rock Art Volume XIV 1995 LITTLE BLACK MOUNTAIN PETROGLYPH SITE ON THE ARIZONA STRIP LEGEND Station 1 Prime Datum 1 Rock Art 0 Section Number 11 1?10 •8 5.•607. 2 1 4. 0 olo 60 90 120 METERS Utah Rock Art Volume XIV 1995 FIGURE 1 Selected Recreational & Historical Sites Hc Arizona 0 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, N-8 Canyon de Chelly National Monument, E -12 0 Grand Canyon National Park, E-6 Land Area: 113,510 sq. mi. (6) N cE Population: 2,718,425 (20) A Lake Powell (Glen Canyon Nat').Rec. Area), C-8 London Bridge (Lake Havasu City), I-2 Dimensions: N-S 390 miles, E-W 335 miles Mi ighest Point: Humphreys Peak 12,633 ft., G-7 Oak Creek Canyon, G -7 arr Capital: Phoenix K-6 * Petrified Forest National Park, H -11 int Largest City: Phoenix, K-6 Saguaro National Monument, N -9 nu Index paw, 17U 1 , PACIFIC'S if. MOUNTAIN Panguitch 12 100 (Ti E ZONE!. TIME NE DIXIE Z• DIXIE NAT'L Escalante See map NAT'L. FOREST page 97 Newcastle c, FOR. s Caliente Hatch BRYCE. , tlf71 CEDAR BREAKS CANYON Tropic DIXIE NATIONAL 57 NAT'L MON. NAT'L PK Enterprise FOREST • Kanarraville Henrieville ,: Cannonvilie 0 \ New Harmony • CLO VER Central NETS. \,' See map Alamo 7,7-le • ...,,, page 9 8 ' Valley ,..1r 1 if , Vega „Ir..- 27 .. r Gunloc k ‘'.. 011 - 'i 7IO N ;.‘ .021 1/ Toquerville 1Y AT t C td Lee a PARK.. , 7OVNEL Ord Nine ""- fr 15 f La Verkin ■ . cSiaanra".... „5 • 0 pringdale --•"" 1,1‘ / 'ricane Rockville , s George 2T • nn 23 ,e0), „TT- ifT ••. _ _et Hddala na UTAH Glen Canyo k\ a -- — - ,..:.,..- -...-a._ - — - • ., _ c 19 - ColorColoradocy 55 Cane ,t Beds ' KAIBAB 2 INDIAN redo ma I Be ver Dam A Tr . l'i' occasin Rt to c I - --, At 5; .k.V° esquite A5i no 42 32 :A:fa, eilA , PLATEAU C-' 100 8 Littlefield y Cr meat, 1:::nlyboIC:9-:11::;:: ' 1 Ppl Sproiq ob F ::1 Pge c/ss, Jacob V 4 5. 0C, 3. '-' Nall. Mon. NA to Bodge • 93 'Z 8012onus it V 0Rt I TT1 i 24 VER4E 11 B' f FS Cl :Jacob CO 4' % \A Lake 1 House., 15. 2- Diamond Boor -2% Rock 1:',5- -2::,V. i Jc.ogisnOrcle S 6326 11 / KAIBAB - l NATIONAL ) - aabkley or 4 •E ve on , FlreStareA.- FOREST ,c2 !rural Alga • ,r; c2 , INI 64 ml T8020 t10 Demntr- A P've61MI 't A 58 ,s' ,... ,_..•, I ■C.)1 Cedar • 59 16 V 1.0,1a11 A The Dome , See map TAKE WAD 7866 It KAIRATI Page 6 f • I • 0'1 5 486 It ,, t ...30. 7 page 60 () NAT'L RTC. NAT'L F R it ., It ! 1- i i A..,r ,,,, ,et ' , / GRA:: CANYONON m, E,,,t, 7.i.... •._ ■ ,----,-- , /- .;ttlpfti :-.... ..._ , NATIONAL .‘..1 ) -- o c OThNe ..-,,7,.., 0 : i HAVASUPAI ---'\ -1' PARK F'N'oirrntAPPIR8"°iam3f -r,, A' , ,.,,,,.. , ,,, A47017. 200417! .....,.Huglif,7680:1 ";() . , get as. ,P,--- \---7-,,'„,.. n . ,. 1,...:..-.., ' ''', 5eynal ) Cif HididT011 " cap786 e 11`i•' 1 ,,....., 1c i'eTpl IND,\IAftl'iS. --\'\'' \ '''''A 12 ' Hoover -4,0 marin f , , ..,,,... a •,',) 4. ' -• 1 : ,,`? ,--. 7,... Grand -- ,-z-.,.._` /7--/-1. 74D11$61,8 ,, V 's! Pi ^e D3 , ,-,:- '-.."'""--- e -; A .,, ( 11'.7. 19 ... 4A .... ;.., c-, Ca nyon ; A .-- -0 1 ea dV:1".4 -,...r k-, GRAN0 -, , -11 Desert View sad Pass MI Wilierr -- 71', ...._ Boulddr-sz 74 CANYON -L 2370 ft. Grand Canyon -,......, , 15 A5 7 ,-,... LAKE MEAD i Tusa a 84 co \ • .- ''S 1. ''';,_, P,A17, i.":„., ),. i, NAa oparki ' ---,--s-,.. 17 IA , !f NAT'L. REC. 11 . '') / t '' ...:...s.,': . 53' 3z, . KAIBAB 1- i 31 s •,. '1 1 .}3Veilal°,h . , ' _'_ AREA ,' c:;,, RESE: NATIONAL FOREST ..- •r ameroni 1, HUALAP - --•-• -, - ,, r.;- .{ 1 8 T., t',71; .' tt C) INDIAN 78 / t- RES. A TEAU t ) <?:, tl Dolan ./ -• -r, Gray . f..) 3„J Sprs.. -" in / Mountain (.4 .,/ . • ,, ,,,n Peach 11, . ' w 't S e a r ch I i g h t 1- '' 4H-, " '1'11 ' . ' Mt Tmlon A 691)0 It. m CD KAI BA 8,AP roANCISA, - Recording Petroglyphs at the Little Black Mountain Craig & Craig The site itself is a wonder that it has been a multicultural one used by man for several thousand years. The variety of glyph styles indicates diversity of cultures and the various degrees of repatination of the glyphs indicates a long time period of usage. Patination or "Desert Varnish is the dark coating appearing on rock surfaces in arid lands. Until recently, it was thought to be generated from an inorganic process, however current research has revealed that it is an organic process. The wind deposits clay dust and micro-organisms (bacteria) on the rocks. The bacteria then extract manganese (black) or iron (redish brown) oxides from the rock and clay to create a layer of rock varnish. Rock varnish forms very slowly, taking thousands of years to create the darkest coatings. Sophisticated and expensive laboratory techniques can determine the age of rock varnish. These techniques can also date the petroglyphs. Petroglyph dating is imprecise because there is a time-lag between the carving of a petroglyph and the formation of the rock varnish." (BLM Brochure 6/12/92). According to Christy Turner it takes 600 years for a good patch of lichen to develop; repatination takes 900 years to 1200 years to color to blue-black, purple-black takes even longer. Repatination then, is the process of grooves, lines, scratches etc. made by man gradually in the process of re-creation of the patination or desert varnish. METE0rOLOGY The framework for this project has been current styles in literature and associated cultural affiliation. We approached the recording in line with what we had learned in our Utah Archaeological Certification Course in regard to stratigraphy and association; that is, the earliest glyphs would be superimposed by later ones, and the proximity of glyphs and natural features to each other. The first step was a massive research program of reading everything we could find on rock art and its recordation along with attending symposiums on the subject. Next we decided what areas each of us would be responsible for: George would do the graphics i.e. photographing and sketching as well as devising a computer encoding and coding sheets. Shirley would do the research and write-up. The project would consist of three phases: (1) Recordation; (2) Analyze the results; (3) Extrapolate our methods to other sites to see how well they might work. American Rock Art Research Association did a preliminary survey and limited recording in March 1986. We used the section grid they set up and also went by the numbers they assigned to the various boulders, but we numbered the glyphs differently to meet our needs for computer coding.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ron Blakey, Publications (Does Not Include Abstracts)
    Ron Blakey, Publications (does not include abstracts) The publications listed below were mainly produced during my tenure as a member of the Geology Department at Northern Arizona University. Those after 2009 represent ongoing research as Professor Emeritus. (PDF) – A PDF is available for this paper. Send me an email and I'll attach to return email Blakey, R.C., 1973, Stratigraphy and origin of the Moenkopi Formation of southeastern Utah: Mountain Geologist, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1 17. Blakey, R.C., 1974, Stratigraphic and depositional analysis of the Moenkopi Formation, Southeastern Utah: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 104, 81 p. Blakey, R.C., 1977, Petroliferous lithosomes in the Moenkopi Formation, Southern Utah: Utah Geology, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 67 84. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Oil impregnated carbonate rocks of the Timpoweap Member Moenkopi Formation, Hurricane Cliffs area, Utah and Arizona: Utah Geology, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 45 54. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Stratigraphy of the Supai Group (Pennsylvanian Permian), Mogollon Rim, Arizona: in Carboniferous Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon Country, northern Arizona and southern Nevada, Field Trip No. 13, Ninth International Congress of Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, p. 89 109. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Lower Permian stratigraphy of the southern Colorado Plateau: in Four Corners Geological Society, Guidebook to the Permian of the Colorado Plateau, p. 115 129. (PDF) Blakey, R.C., 1980, Pennsylvanian and Early Permian paleogeography, southern Colorado Plateau and vicinity: in Paleozoic Paleogeography of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, p. 239 258. Blakey, R.C., Peterson, F., Caputo, M.V., Geesaman, R., and Voorhees, B., 1983, Paleogeography of Middle Jurassic continental, shoreline, and shallow marine sedimentation, southern Utah: Mesozoic PaleogeogÂraphy of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section of Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (Symposium), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Moriah Knoll Quadrangle, Northern Mohave County, Arizona
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Moriah Knoll quadrangle, northern Mohave County, Arizona George H. Billingsley, Open-File Report 94-634 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. .S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona 1994 1 INTRODUCTION The Moriah Knoll 7.5' quadrangle is located in northern Mohave County, northwestern Arizona. The quadrangle is about 48 km south of the Arizona/Utah State line and about 56 km southwest of Colorado City, Arizona, the nearest settlement (fig. 1). Elevations range from about 1,426 m (4,680 ft) in the northwest corner of the quadrangle to 2,007 m (6,585 ft) at Berry Knoll in the south-central edge of the quadrangle. Access to the area is by improved dirt road locally referred to as the Temple Trail. The Temple Trail branches south from the Navajo Trail. The Navajo Trail extends to Colorado City, Arizona (fig. 1). Several unimproved dirt roads lead from the Temple Trail to various locations within the quadrangle area. Travel on the Temple Trail can be done with 2 wheel drive vehicles, all other roads require a high-clearance vehicle, or 4 wheel drive in wet weather. The area is managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, including about 4 sections belonging to the state of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Zion Scenic Byway Interpretive Plan FINAL
    Zion Scenic Byway Interpretive Plan FINAL Prepared for: Zion Canyon Corridor Council February, 2015 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction and Project Overview........................................................................................................................ 1 Partners and Stakeholders ................................................................................................................................. 3 Interpretive Plan Process.................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Research and Gathering Existing Data ................................................................................................................... 5 “Listening to Springdale - Identifying Visions for Springdale” Project .................................................................. 5 Interpretive Sites Field Review ........................................................................................................................... 6 Other Coordination ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Marketing and Audience Analysis.......................................................................................................................... 7 Zion Scenic Byway Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah
    Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah Heidi D. Stenner1,3, William R. Lund2, Philip A. Pearthree1, Benjamin L. Everitt4 Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-8 April 1999 Reformatted and revised, May, 2005 1Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W. Congress St. Tucson, AZ 85701 2Utah Geological Survey, Southern Utah Regional Office 3Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 4Utah Department of Water Resources "Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number (Arizona Geological Survey, 1434-HQ-97-GR-03047). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government." TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 ABSTRACT 3 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 6 CHAPTER 2. RECONNAISSANCE PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 45 CHAPTER 3. PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN ANDERSON JUNCTION SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA AND SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 81 CHAPTER 4. LATE QUATERNARY FAULTING ON THE WHITMORE CANYON SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA 99 REFERENCES CITED 106 APPENDICES 2 ABSTRACT We have completed initial paleoseismologic investigations to evaluate the recency and size of paleoearthquakes and long-term slip rates on the Hurricane fault in southern Utah and northern Arizona (SUNA). The Hurricane fault is a long, west-dipping normal fault with substantial late Cenozoic displacement within the structural and seismic transition between the Colorado Plateau and the Basin and Range province. Previous reconnaissance studies of the fault in northern Arizona and southern Utah had documented evidence of late Quaternary activity.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Grand Staircase?
    What is the Grand Staircase? This staircase is like no other. More than six thousand vertical feet of alternating cliffs, slopes, and terraces make up this giant stair- case, which extends horizontally about 150 miles from the north rim of the Grand Canyon in northern Arizona to the top of the Paunsaugunt Plateau in southern Utah. The eastern margin of the Grand Staircase is marked by the East Kaibab monocline, com- monly known as The Cockscomb, and the western margin is generally considered to be the Hurricane Cliffs. Each “riser” is a cliff or slope as much as 2,000 feet high and each “tread” is a plateau, terrace, or flat that is as much as 15 miles wide. The origin of the name “Grand Staircase” is uncertain, although early explorers like Clarence Dutton described this area as being “like a great stairway” in the 1880s. A generalized outline of the Grand Staircase. Capitol ° Waterpocket 38 Reef UTAH A classic portion of the staircase is within the Nat'l. IUS UAR Park western part of the Grand Staircase-Escalante AQ ESCALANTE PLATEAUEscalante National Monument in southern Utah. The Dixie National CANYON Fold Bryce Forest REGION alternating configuration of cliffs, terraces, and PLATEAU Canyon Glen PAUNSAUGUNT Straight Cliffs Nat'l. slopes is due to the varied erosion rates of dif- Garfield Co. Park Canyon ferent rock types. Harder rocks, such as sand- Kane 37°30' Co. Henrieville Fiftymile Bench stone and limestone, erode slowly and make up KAIPAROWITS Nat'l. the cliffs and terraces. Softer rocks, such as REGION shale and siltstone, erode faster and make up GRAND The Cockscomb the slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • 998, Hurricane Fault Zone
    998, HURRICANE FAULT ZONE Structure number: 998. Comments: Structure name: Hurricane fault zone. Comments: Hecker's (1993) fault number 10-7. Lund and others (2001) and Stenner and others (1999) describe the sections of the fault zone in Utah and Arizona. Synopsis: Long, generally north-trending Holocene to late Pleistocene fault along the base of the Hurricane Cliffs near the western margin of the Colorado Plateaus. The fault zone shows considerable Cenozoic displacement, which increases northward from Arizona into Utah. Date of compilation: 7/01. Compiler and affiliation: Bill D. Black, Greg N. McDonald, and Mike Hylland (Utah Geological Survey), and Suzanne Hecker (U.S. Geological Survey). State: Utah; Arizona. County: Washington, Iron; Mohave, Coconino. 1° x 2° sheet: Cedar City, Grand Canyon, Williams. Province: Basin and Range and Colorado Plateaus. Geologic setting: From the Utah-Arizona border, the fault trends north, then northeast along the steep and linear Hurricane Cliffs, forming a narrow zone of sub-parallel, en- echelon, west-dipping normal faults that displace generally horizontal Paleozoic through Cenozoic rocks and Quaternary basalt flows down to the west. The fault zone is in a 150-kilometer-wide structural and seismic transition zone between the Basin and Range and Colorado Plateaus provinces. Substantial late Cenozoic displacement on down-to- the-west normal faults in the transition zone (such as the Grand Wash and Toroweap faults in Arizona, and the Hurricane and Washington faults in Utah) has formed a stair- stepped series of plateaus and escarpments down to the west. Stewart and Taylor (1996) document 450 meters of stratigraphic separation in Quaternary basalt displaced by the fault, and a total separation of 2,520 meters across a portion of the Hurricane fault near Anderson Junction.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the COLORADO PLATEAU Annabelle Foos Geology Department, University of Akron
    GEOLOGY OF THE COLORADO PLATEAU Annabelle Foos Geology Department, University of Akron Introduction and Range. The margins of the Colorado The Colorado Plateau is a land of scenic Plateau are marked by major volcanic beauty characterized by sparsely vegetated accumulations (figure 2). plateaus, mesas, deep canyons, and barren Geophysical studies indicate the earth's badlands. It encompasses an area of crust is relatively thick below the province and approximately 140,000 square miles in the four heat flow (geothermal gradient) is relatively corners region of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and low. The plateau also has distinct gravity and New Mexico. It includes the area drained by magnetic signatures. the Colorado River and it's tributaries the The Colorado Plateau has been divided Green, San Juan and Little Colorado Rivers into the following six sections (Rigby, 1977): (figure 1). 1) Grand Canyon section, structurally this is the The combination of high relief and an arid highest part of the Colorado Plateau province. climate over most of the plateau has resulted in 2) High Plateaus section, this section is limited plant cover. The products of weathering characterized by high, north-trending plateaus, are easily eroded by fast moving streams separated from each other by faults. 3) Uinta leaving behind bare rocks which produce the Basin, this is structurally the lowest part of the dramatic scenery of this area. Not to mention, Colorado Plateau. 4) Canyonlands section, the excellent rock exposures waiting to be deeply incised canyons are distinctive features explored by a group of geology students. of this section which contains large monoclines Elevations on the plateau range from and laccolithic mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resource Evaluation Report, Zion National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Zion National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2006/014 Zion National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2006/014 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 March 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. Views and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect policies of the National Park Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hurricane Fault Zone, and the Cedar Pocket Canyon- Shebit-Gunlock Fault Complex, Southwestern Utah And
    The Hurricane fault zone and the Cedar Pocket Canyon-Shebit-Gunlock fault complex, southwestern Utah and northwestern Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Lovejoy, Earl M. P. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 02:53:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565618 THE HURRICANE FAULT ZONE, AND THE CEDAR POCKET CANYON- SHEBIT-GUNLOCK FAULT COMPLEX, SOUTHWESTERN UTAH AND NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA by Earl Mark Paul Lovejoy A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1964 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction b y _______ Earl Mark Paul Love joy _____ ■' ' entitled The Hurricane Fault Zone, and the Cedar P o c k e t Canyon-Shebit-Gunlock Fault Complex, Southwestern Utah and Northwestern Arizona______ ____________ ________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree o f _____ Doctor of Philosophy ______ '_____ & * * * / ? 6 < / Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* * d * * , A 3 2-. /y/y I/Jjuu TifR *> 2., (96 f d?u/a--z~, /vLb- *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Bibliography
    Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Bibliography I. Geology Resources Mineral Deposits Adamek, P., Behr, H.J., and von Pechmann, E., 1992. "Gold-bearing collapse-breccia pipe, Copper Mountain, northwestern Arizona," in, Short Papers of the U.S. Geological Survey Uranium Workshop, 1990, Dickinson, K.A. (ed.), U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1069, pp 51- 53. Arizona Bureau of Mines, 1969. Mineral and Water Resources of Arizona, Arizona Bureau of Mines [now Arizona Geological Survey] Bulletin 160, p. 638. Arizona Bureau of Mines, 1986. Geology and Mineralogy of the apex Germanium-gallium Mine, Washington, County, Utah, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1577, p. 9. Billingsley, G.H., Antweiler, J.C., and Ellis, C.E., 1983. Mineral Resource Potential of the Kanab Creek Roadless Area, Coconino and Mohave Counties, Arizona, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1627-A, scale 1:48,000. Billingsley, G.H., Antweiler, J.C., Lucchitta, Ivo, Beard, L.S., and Lane, M.E., 1986. Mineral Resource Potential of the Pigeon Canyon, Nevershine, and Snap Point Wilderness Study Areas, Mohave County, Arizona, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map MF-1860- A, scale 1;50,000. Billingsley, G.H., and Ellis, C.E., 1983. Mineral Resource Potential of the Kanab Creek RARE II Further Planning Area, Coconino and Mohave Counties, Arizona, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1300, pp. 76-78. Blakey, R.C., 1979. Oil impregnated Carbonate Rocks of the Timpoweap Member of the Moenkopi Formation, Hurricane Cliffs, Utah and Arizona, Utah Geology, Vol. 6, pp. 45-54. Bliss, J.D., 1993. Mineral Resource Assessment of Undiscovered Mineral Deposits for Selected Mineral Deposit Types in the Kaibab National Forest, Arizona, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Fault.Pdf
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GEOJ (3GY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1997 ANNUAL MEETING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PART2 TWO EDITED BY PAUL KARL LINK AND BART J. KOWALLIS VOLUME 42 1997 MESOZOIC TO RECENT GEOLOGY OF UTAH Edited by Paul Karl Link and Bart J. Kowallis BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GEOLOGY STUDIES Volume 42, Part 11, 1997 CONTENTS Triassic and Jurassic Macroinvertebrate Faunas of Utah: Field Relationships and Paleobiologic Significance ........................................ Carol M. Tang and David J. Bottjer Part 2: Trace fossils, hardgrounds and ostreoliths in the Carmel Formation (Middle Jurassic) of southwestern Utah ...........................................Mark A. Wilson Part 3: Low-diversity faunas of the Middle Jurassic Carmel Formation and their paleobiological implications ................................Carol M. Tang and David J. Bottjer Part 4: Paleoecology of Lower Triassic marine carbonates in the southwestern USA ....................... ......................................................David J. Bottjer and Jennifer K. Schubert Structure and Kinematics of a Complex Impact Crater, Upheaval Dome, Southeast Utah .........................Bryan J. Kriens, Eugene M. Shoemaker, and Ken E. Herkenhoff Stratigraphy, and structure of the Sevier thrust belt, and proximal foreland-basin system in central Utah: A transect from the Sevier Desert to the Wasatch Plateau ...................T. E Lawton, D. A. Sprinkel, F! G. DeCelles, G. Mitra, A. J. Sussman,, and M. l? Weiss Lower to Middle Cretaceous Dinosaur Faunas of the Central Colorado Plateau: A Key to Understanding 35 Million Years of Tectonics, Sedimentology, Evolution, and Biogeography ..................... James I. Kirkland, Brooks Britt, Donald L. Burge, Ken Carpenter, Richard Cifelli, Frank DeCourten, Jeffrey Eaton, Steve Hasiotis, and Tim Lawton Sequence Architecture, and Stacking Patterns in the Cretaceous Foreland Basin, Utah: Tectonism versus Eustasy ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zion National Park Geologic Resources Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Zion National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2006/014 Zion National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2006/014 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 March 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. Views and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect policies of the National Park Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]