Horse), Understanding the Land: Free-Roaming Horses in the Culture and Ecology of the Brittany Triangle and Nemiah Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Horse), Understanding the Land: Free-Roaming Horses in the Culture and Ecology of the Brittany Triangle and Nemiah Valley Knowing Naŝlhiny (Horse), Understanding the Land: Free-Roaming Horses in the Culture and Ecology of the Brittany Triangle and Nemiah Valley by Jonaki Bhattacharyya A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Jonaki Bhattacharyya 2012 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Free-roaming horses (Equus ferus caballus L.) – also called wild or feral – have been present in the Chilcotin region of British Columbia, Canada and part of Tsilhqot’in First Nations’ culture for over 250 years. The horses, naŝlhiny in Tsilhqot’in, have also been a focal point for controversy and power struggles over land use in the same region for at least 120 years. Recently, the wild horses of the Brittany Triangle (called Tachelach’ed, near the Nemiah Valley in the territory of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation) have been used by local First Nations and some non-governmental organizations as an iconic symbol to gain support for wilderness conservation. To some other residents and government agencies, free-roaming horses are invasive pests that threaten forage availability for cattle, range health, and native wildlife habitat. Little peer-reviewed research exists to elucidate the actual ecological impacts and social relationships of free-roaming horses in the particular ecological, cultural and political context of the Brittany Triangle, or to support management decisions concerning the horses. This research explores how scientific analysis, local knowledge, and socio-cultural perspectives regarding the ecology and cultural role of free-roaming horses in the Brittany Triangle can be integrated to inform conservation planning and land use management. The primary objectives were: 1) to determine and quantify the species of vegetation where horses are feeding; 2) to document local socio-cultural knowledge and perceptions of free-roaming horses; and 3) to determine how ecological information and socio-cultural perspectives can be integrated to inform conservation planning and land use management. This transdisciplinary, mixed-methods study took an exploratory, adaptive approach over six years of site visits, including two preparatory field visits (2006-2007), four field seasons over two years of formal data collection (2008-2009), and two follow-up visits (2010-2011). A line-point intersect method and statistical analysis were used to assess plant community composition and variance in eight sample sites that are grazing habitat of free-roaming horses. Qualitative research involved literature review, participant observation among host communities, semi-structured key informant interviews, and extensive observation of free-roaming horses and other wildlife in the Brittany Triangle. Results demonstrate that the free-roaming horses are part of a social-ecological complex, one of many disturbance factors in a system with multiple drivers of ecological and social change. Grazing and disturbance of vegetation by horses are patchy and heterogeneous in distribution, but no statistically significant difference was found in plant community composition or heights between sample sites. Qualitative research demonstrates that while the horses are currently remote from much human contact, iii they and the landscape are part of a rich history of interaction with people in Chilcotin society and cultures, particularly in Xeni Gwet’in and other Tsilhqot’in communities. Disagreements over free- roaming horses reveal deeper differences in ways of knowing that underlie management actions, including differing perceptions of “the wild” in relation to humans, and a history of power struggles over land use between First Nations and government authorities from colonial and settler cultures. As well, vegetation communities in sample meadow habitats did not show signs of ecologically significant structural variance or ubiquitous damage on a spatial scale large enough to warrant management intervention in horse populations within the Brittany Triangle at this time. Local knowledge and livelihood practices among Xeni Gwet’in and other local people have functioned as an informal management system for free-roaming horses in the Brittany Triangle and Nemiah Valley. Broadly, this study suggests a partial rather than full integration of diverse ways of knowing may sometimes be desirable in order to maintain the epistemological and contextual depth and richness of different knowledge systems. Effective integration of diverse ways of knowing in management warrants not only the integration of information into knowledge products (i.e. reports, studies, proposals, etc.), but also the equitable inclusion of knowledge holders in processes and decisions. Narrative can be an effective means of conveying complexity in situations of conflict or controversy. This research also finds that a recognition of the agency that wild animals and the land itself have in relationships with humans, and the sense of collective responsibility towards the land and wild animals are two elements that indigenous perspectives can contribute to management and planning frameworks. This research indicates that it is possible and desirable to maintain a population of free-roaming horses in the Brittany Triangle as part of a functional social ecological system, in ways that are appropriate to, and expressive of the culture, identity and livelihood practices of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation. The success of localized stewardship and management depends on: 1) culturally-appropriate means of limiting horse populations including maintaining predator populations; 2) defining management zones based on ecosystems, political and cultural boundaries, and horse sub-populations; 3) basing actions and decisions on systemic, not segmented, ecological indicators; 4) encouraging people to spend time on the land moving cattle more frequently on grazed open range; 5) cultivating stewardship and monitoring activities; 6) including socio-cultural values and goals in management objectives; 7) recognizing diverse people and ways of knowing in land use and management decisions; and 8) encouraging traditional activities as part of dynamic and changing local livelihoods. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The process of doing this research and completing the dissertation has been a journey of personal growth and change, a grand adventure. I am humbled by the gracious kindness and generosity with which so many people have supported me through the experience. It takes effort and dedication from many people to complete a project of this sort, and this dissertation is the result of collective effort by a wonderful group of people, many of whom have become family to me over the years. To all those people who were part of the process, too numerous to name here individually, thank you. Thank you to the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation, Tsilhqot’in Nations, the people of Nemiah Valley, and all participants in this study who welcomed me into your territory and communities, and showed patience and good humour while teaching me about your lives and your land. In particular, I am deeply grateful to Roger William, Lois Williams, Marilyn Baptiste, (the late) Harry Setah, and David Setah for your guidance and support. There are many more community members, leaders, and elders I would like to name, and of whom I think with gratitude, respect and fondness. My deep gratitude is extended to my academic advisor, Stephen Murphy, and committee members, Scott Slocombe, Susan Wismer, John Lewis, and Erik Beever. You each offered guidance and support above and beyond the call of academic duty! I am ever grateful to staff Edie Cardwell and Elaine Garner for your personalized support. To the amazing women who were my field assistants and fellow adventurers in the field – Joanna MacLean, Megan Ihrig, Katherine Card, and Jessica Setah Alphonse – Thank You! You each uplifted me with your spirit, humour, dedication and determination, and your joyous appreciation of the land. Also, my thanks to all the volunteers who helped with field work: Ann Dewar, Cali Waddell, Wayne Gray, and Annette Dehalt. My heartfelt gratitude to those wonderful people who have become my “Chilcotin family”: Maureen and Jerry Tickner and family, Beth and Gerry Gregg, Laura and (the late) Harry Setah and family, especially Jessica and Wesley Setah-Alphonse. You all give me the sensation of arriving home each time I return to the Chilcotin. Throughout this research process, I was buoyed up, guided, and mentored by a number of people who have come to hold special places in my heart. I give special thanks to Wayne McCrory for introducing me to the bush and unfailingly supporting my learning, and to Allen Dobb for always understanding (everything), keeping things in perspective, and for your music. v This project could never have happened without the help of all board members of the Friends of Nemaiah Valley, especially Pat Swift. Thank you for inspiring me with your work, helping with details and logistics, and for your enthusiastic humour! Thanks also to Nancy Oppermann, and to all of my graduate student colleagues and friends for your help with editorial and moral support, especially Jackie Dawson, Sara Ashpole and Sue von der Porten. I formally thank the wildlife, horses and the land itself in the Brittany Triangle and Chilcotin. Also, my thanks lie with Sable and Lucy, who looked after me, and always knew which way to go in the bush. To my family members, close friends, and loved ones – only you know the true highs and lows of this journey, and words cannot express how grateful I am to each of you for the support you have provided. Family: Mum, Dad, Robin, Jay; and dear friends Lena Soots, Kim Cooper, Carla Weinberg, Megan Ihrig, Sharmalene Mendis-Millard, and Brian Dell. Thank you for your love, patience and for being there unfailingly, no matter what. To David Williams, no words are adequate to thank you.
Recommended publications
  • B.C. First Nations Community Economic Development Forum
    B.C. First Nations Community Economic Development Forum January 17 & 18, 2007 - Richmond, B.C. “Restoring a Working Culture” forum report - overview and recommendations BC First Nations Community Economic Development Forum Restoring a Working Culture a forum to Stimulate discussions and gain insight into the issues related to economic development within First Nations communities Explore and identify how First Nations leaders can play a key role in economic development Inspire political support required to make economic development a priority Create networking opportunities that will benefit participants in the future table of contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Renovating BC First Nation communities - Stephen Cornell ....................................................................... 3 Discussion Sessions / Breakout Groups Setting directions ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Constitution/Governance ................................................................................................................................... 8 Making First Nations economies work .........................................................................................................10 Recommendations - Restoring a working culture.........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Development Advisory Committee Agenda
    Cariboo Regional District AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Thursday, April 25, 2019, 8:30-9:30 am Via Conference Call 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES – March 25, 2019 meeting (as circulated) 4. DELEGATIONS 5. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.1. Regional Agri-food Centre Business Plan update https://www.quesnel.ca/city-hall/major- initiatives/agriculture-centre-business-plan 6. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS 6.1. FARMED Rural Dividend Project Development Agriculture Education Program Update 6.2. ADAC First Nations Communication and Engagement Strategy 6.3. Agriculture Working Group Administration Report 7. CORRESPONDENCE 7.1. Email communication March 26, 2019, Tyler Jasper – letter attached 7.2. Upcoming Events May 14, 2019 CRD sponsored North Cariboo Info Fair 5:30 – 7pm Barlow Creek Community Hall - 3810 Trembley Road, Quesnel May 23-25, 2019 BC Cattlemen’s 2019 AGM 525 Proctor Street, Williams Lake June 1, 2019 National Farm Animal Care Council Codes of Practice BC Regulation referencing comes into force June 7, 2019 ADAC Presentation to the Cariboo Regional District Board of Directors Time - TBA Quesnel – Location to be determined 8. ROUNDTABLE 9. QUESTION PERIOD 10. ADJOURNMENT Next Meeting: To be determined Agenda Submission Deadline: Agricultural Development Advisory Committee (ADAC) April 25, 2019 P a g e | 2 of 2 QUESTION PERIOD Question Period provides the public with the opportunity to ask questions or make comments on subject that are of concern to them. Each person will be given 2 minutes
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 4 Students
    ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 4 STUDENTS You can preview the survey online at BRITISH COLUMBIA www.mdi.ubc.ca. INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Presentation to the CEAA Panel on the Prosperity Project April 27, 2010
    Fisheries Presentation to The CEAA Panel On the Prosperity Project April 27, 2010 20+20=20+20= 4040 By: Richard Holmes MSc. RPBio. QEP WildWild SalmonSalmon PolicyPolicy (Photo by Peter Essick) ConservationConservation UnitsUnits sockeye-lake 218 sockeye-river 24 chinook 68† coho 43 chum 38† pink-even 13 pink-odd 19 Sub-total 423 FishFish SpeciesSpecies KnownKnown toto InhabitInhabit TasekoTaseko RiverRiver ¾ BullBull TroutTrout ¾ DollyDolly VardenVarden ¾ LongnoseLongnose SuckerSucker ¾ MountainMountain WhitefishWhitefish ¾ RainbowRainbow TroutTrout ¾ SockeyeSockeye SalmonSalmon ¾ ChinookChinook SalmonSalmon ¾ SteelheadSteelhead ¾ WhitefishWhitefish (General)(General) TasekoTaseko RiverRiver SockeyeSockeye EscapementEscapement 19491949--20092009 ¾¾ EscapementEscapement == thosethose returningreturning toto spawnspawn ¾¾ 19631963 == 31,66731,667 ¾¾ 19881988 == 11,13811,138 ¾¾ 2009=2009= 4040 ¾¾ Sorry,Sorry, butbut II’’mm notnot convincedconvinced whatsoeverwhatsoever thatthat thingsthings areare simplysimply goinggoing toto bebe okok inin thethe TasekoTaseko RiverRiver watershedwatershed shouldshould thisthis minemine bebe grantedgranted approvalapproval toto proceedproceed Lake Sockeye CUs in Pacific/Yukon 218 CUs • notable diversity: NC CC, NVI, SFj Diversity = Production Lake Sockeye CUs in Pacific/Yukon 218 CUs • notable diversity: NC CC, NVI, SFj Diversity = Production Year Population Peak of Spawn Total Males Females Jacks 1948 Taseko Lake 0000 1949 Taseko Lake 100 62 38 0 1950 Taseko Lake 500 250 250 0 1951 Taseko Lake 500 250
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Wildlife, Ecological and Landscape Coonectivity Values
    INVENTORY OF WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICAL, AND LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY VALUES, TSILHQOT'IN FIRST NATIONS CULTURAL/HERITAGE VALUES, & RESOURCE CONFLICTS IN THE DASIQOX-TASEKO WATERSHED, BC CHILCOTIN FINAL REPORT (Revised) August 4, 2014 For Xeni Gwet’in & Yunesit’in First Nations By Wayne McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. Phone: 250-358-7796; email: [email protected] and First Nations cultural/heritage research: Linda Smith, MSc, & Alice William GIS mapping by Baden Cross, Applied Conservation GIS Corridor modeling by Dr. Lance Craighead, Craighead Research Institute ii LEGAL COVENANT FROM THE XENI GWET’IN GOVERNMENT When the draft of this report was completed in March 2014, the following legal covenant was included: The Tsilhqot'in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nation”). Tsilhqot’in Nation (Vickers J, 2007) also recognized the Tsilhqot’in aboriginal right to hunt and trap birds and animals for the purposes of securing animals for work and transportation, food, clothing, shelter, mats, blankets, and crafts, as well as for spiritual, ceremonial, and cultural uses throughout the Brittany Triangle (Tachelach’ed) and the Xeni Gwet’in Trapline. This right is inclusive of a right to capture and use horses for transportation and work. The Court found that the Tsilhqot’in people also have an aboriginal right to trade in skins and pelts as a means of securing a moderate livelihood. These lands are within the Tsilhqot'in traditional territory, the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation’s caretaking area, and partially in the Yunesit’in Government’s caretaking area.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Regulation B.C
    Adoption Act and Financial Administration Act ADOPTION REGULATION B.C. Reg. 291/96 Deposited and effective November 4, 1996 Last amended September 25, 2017 by B.C. Reg. 175/2017 Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia This is an unofficial consolidation. Point in time from September 25, 2017 to March 1, 2020 B.C. Reg. 291/96 (O.C. 1226/96), deposited and effective November 4, 1996, is made under the Adoption Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 5, ss. 91 and 93, and the Financial Adminis- tration Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 138, s. 19. This is an unofficial consolidation provided for convenience only. This is not a copy prepared for the purposes of the Evidence Act. This consolidation includes any amendments deposited and in force as of the currency date at the bottom of each page. See the end of this regulation for any amendments deposited but not in force as of the currency date. Any amendments deposited after the currency date are listed in the B.C. Regulations Bulletins. All amendments to this regulation are listed in the Index of B.C. Regulations. Regulations Bulletins and the Index are available online at www.bclaws.ca. See the User Guide for more information about the Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia. The User Guide and the Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia are available online at www.bclaws.ca. Prepared by: Office of Legislative Counsel Ministry of Attorney General Victoria, B.C. Point in time from September 25, 2017 to March 1, 2020 Adoption Act and Financial Administration Act ADOPTION REGULATION B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students
    ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 7 STUDENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA You can preview the survey online at INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY www.mdi.ubc.ca. NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version: Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Child, Family and Community Service Regulation B.C
    Child, Family and Community Service Act CHILD, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE REGULATION B.C. Reg. 527/95 Deposited December 15, 1995 and effective January 29, 1996 Last amended May 4, 2020 by B.C. Reg. 95/2020 Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia This is an unofficial consolidation. Consolidation current to May 8, 2020 B.C. Reg. 527/95 (O.C. 1589/95), deposited December 15, 1995 and effective January 29, 1996, is made under the Child, Family and Community Service Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 46, s. 103. This is an unofficial consolidation provided for convenience only. This is not a copy prepared for the purposes of the Evidence Act. This consolidation includes any amendments deposited and in force as of the currency date at the bottom of each page. See the end of this regulation for any amendments deposited but not in force as of the currency date. Any amendments deposited after the currency date are listed in the B.C. Regulations Bulletins. All amendments to this regulation are listed in the Index of B.C. Regulations. Regulations Bulletins and the Index are available online at www.bclaws.ca. See the User Guide for more information about the Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia. The User Guide and the Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia are available online at www.bclaws.ca. Prepared by: Office of Legislative Counsel Ministry of Attorney General Victoria, B.C. Consolidation current to May 8, 2020 Child, Family and Community Service Act CHILD, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE REGULATION B.C. Reg. 527/95 Contents PART 1 –
    [Show full text]
  • Taseko Lake Outfitters
    MANAGEMENT PLAN Taseko Lake Outfitters Siegfried Jurgen Reuter Kelly Gayle Reuter October 2012 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Plan 2 Proponents & General Overview of Business 2 Description of Operation & Activities 2 1.1 General Area & Base Operation 2 1.2.1 Purpose & Description of Experience 2 Activities Offered 2 1.2.2 Improvements 2 1.2.3 Detailed list of Activities & Level of Use 2 Table 1 Extensive Use Area 2 1.2.4 Staff 2 1.3 Intensive Use Sites 2 Facilities & Camps 2 Table 3 Details of Intensive Use Sites 2 Overlap with Environmental & Cultural Values 2 2.1 Fish Values 2 2.2 Wildlife Values 2 2.3 Water Values 2 2.4 First Nations 2 Overlap with Existing Use 2 3.1 Mineral tenures 2 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 2 3.2 Timber Tenures and Public Recreation: 3 3.3 Land Use, Community, Public Health 3 3.4 Hazards and Safety Plan 3 Maps of Taseko Lake Outfitters 3 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 3 MANAGEMENT PLAN Taseko Lake Outfitters Executive Summary Proponents & General Overview of Business Siegfried & Kelly Reuter wholly owns Taseko Lake Outfitters. It is a subsidiary of North- ern Spruce Log homes & Landscaping Ltd. and was incorporated on January 16, 1991 with British Columbia incorporation #399997. The Taseko Lake Lodge has been on a License of Occupation for Guide Outfitting for over 75 years. The structures are solid log and not merely tent frames. There has been substantial investment and improvement made to BC land over the years by dedicated and hard working pioneers of wilderness tourism, former guide outfitters.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT of the RAINSHADOW WILD HORSE ECOSYSTEM, Brittany Triangle, Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada
    PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT of the RAINSHADOW WILD HORSE ECOSYSTEM, Brittany Triangle, Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada. A review of GRIZZLY AND BLACK BEARS, OTHER WILDLIFE, FERAL HORSES & WILD SALMON March, 2002 By Wayne McCrory, RPBio. Submitted to McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. Friends of the Nemaiah Valley PO Box 479, New Denver, BC, V0G 1S0, Canada 1010 Foul Bay Road Victoria, BC V8S 4J1 Ph: 250-358-7796; E-mail: [email protected] 250 592-1088 www.fonv.ca [email protected] i With thanks to the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation for welcoming us on to their traditional territory to carry out this research Xeni Gwet’in Chief Roger William on trail in Brittany Triangle in September, 2001 Suggested Citation: McCrory, W.P. 2002. Preliminary conservation assessment of the Rainshadow Wild Horse Ecosystem, Brittany Triangle, Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada. A review of grizzly and black bears, other wildlife, wild horses, and wild salmon. Report for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV), 1010 Foul Bay Road, Victoria, B.C. V8S 4J1. [Copies available from FONV at cost. For more information see: http://www.fonv.ca. Copying and distribution of this report are encouraged. Readers are welcome to cite this report but are requested that citations and references be acknowledged and placed in context]. ii One of two wild horse herds studied in Nuntsi Provincial Park in 2001. Hundreds of these small and large meadows are scattered throughout the pine forests of the Brittany Triangle, providing important habitats for wild horses, grizzly and black bears, and other wildlife from spring to fall. Over the long Chilcotin winter, the horses survive on grasses and sedges in these meadow areas as well as pine grass in the adjacent forests.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of British Columbia
    No. 90 0913 Victoria Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: ROGER WILLIAM, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nations Government and on behalf of all other members of the Tsilhqot’in Nation PLAINTIFF AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF THE CARIBOO FOREST REGION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF’ S REPLY APPENDIX 1B PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS’ SUBMISSIONS ON DEFINITE TRACTS OF LAND WOODWARD & ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMPANY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA JUSTICE, CANADA Barristers and Solicitors Civil Litigation Section Aboriginal Law Section 844 Courtney Street, 2nd Floor 3RD Floor, 1405 Douglas Street 900 – 840 Howe Street Victoria, BC V8W 1C4 Victoria, BC V8W 9J5 Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2S9 Solicitors for the Plaintiff Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Solicitor for the Defendant, Majesty the Queen in the Right of The Attorney General of Canada the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region ROSENBERG & BORDEN LADNER ROSENBERG GERVAIS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Barristers & Solicitors 671D Market Hill Road 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Vancouver, BC V5Z 4B5 Burrard Street Solicitors for the Plaintiff Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2 Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region Exhibit 43 Photograph 38 Plaintiff’s Reply Appendix 1B Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendants’ Submissions on Definite Tracts of Land A. Southeast Tsilhqox Biny (Chilko Lake): west Ts’il?os (Mount Tatlow) and Relevant Portions of the Tl’echid Gunaz (Long Valley), Yuhitah (Yohetta Valley), Ts’i Talhl?ad (Rainbow Creek), Tsi Tese?an (Tchaikazan Valley) and Tsilhqox Tu Tl’az (Edmonds River) Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Agreement") Amendment Agreement #1 Whereas
    22-APR-2009 01:22PM FROM-TSILHQOTINNATION GOV +12503985798 T-310 P.002/005 F-972 Interim Agreement On Forest and Range Opportunities ("the Agreement") Amendment Agreement #1 Whereas: A. The parties entered into the Agreement on March 30, 2009. B. The parties wish to amend the Agreement as set out in this Amendment Agreement #1 for the express purpose of i) adding TI'etinqox (Anaham) as an additional party to the Agreement; and ii) alter the schedule of revenue sharing payments by advancing one year (upfront) in revenue payments. THEREFORE: The parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. In the definition of the Parties representing The Tsilhqot'in Nation, the list is amended to read as follows: As Represented by Chief and Council of (the "?Esdilagh (Alexandria) TI'esqox (Toosey) TI'etinqox (Anaham) Tsi Del Del (Alexis Creek) Yunesit'in (Stone) Xeni Gwet'in First Nations Government") 2. )\ Sections 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.4 and 7.2 of the Agreement are replaced with the following sections; and new sections 4.3.6 and 4.3.7 are added: 4.1.2 After the execution of this Agreement, and if applicable, once volume becomes available through the timber reallocation process, the Minister will invite the Tsilhqot'in Nation, or such legal entity as the Tsilhqot'in Nation has appointed as its representative to hold the licences to apply under the Forest Act for non-replacement forest licences (the "Licences") ana non-competitive basis for up to 168 800 cubic meters, as follows: ?Esdilagh (Alexandria) 8000 TI'esqQ)c(Toosey) 14200 Tl'etinqox (Anaham) 74000 I 22-APR-2009 01 :22P~ FROM-TSILHQOTINNATION GOV +12503985798 T-310 P.003/005 F-972 TSi Del Del (Alexis Creek) 31200 Yunesit'in (Stone) 20000 Xeni Gwet'in First Nations Government 21400 for a total annual amount of 168800 in the Williams Lake and Quesnel Timber Supply Area(s).
    [Show full text]