TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes Of TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes of 612th Meeting of the Metro Planning Committee held at 9:00 a.m. on 21.9.2018 Present Director of Planning Chairman Mr Raymond K.W. Lee Mr Lincoln L.H. Huang Vice-chairman Mr Stephen H.B. Yau Dr Lawrence W.C. Poon Mr Thomas O.S. Ho Mr Alex T.H. Lai Professor T.S. Liu Ms Sandy H.Y. Wong Mr Franklin Yu Mr Daniel K.S. Lau Ms Lilian S.K. Law Professor John C.Y. Ng Professor Jonathan W.C. Wong - 2 - Assistant Commissioner for Transport (Urban), Transport Department Mr Eddie S.K. Leung Chief Engineer (Works), Home Affairs Department Mr Martin W.C. Kwan Principal Environmental Protection Officer (Metro Assessment), Environmental Protection Department Mr Tony W.H. Cheung Assistant Director (Regional 1), Lands Department Mr Simon S.W. Wang Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Ms Jacinta K.C. Woo Absent with Apologies Mr Sunny L.K. Ho Dr Frankie W.C. Yeung Mr Wilson Y.W. Fung Mr Stanley T.S. Choi In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Miss Fiona S.Y. Lung Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr Kepler S.Y. Yuen Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr Harris K.C. Liu - 3 - Agenda Item 1 Confirmation of the Draft Minutes of the 611th MPC Meeting held on 7.9.2018 [Open Meeting] 1. The Secretary reported that subsequent to the circulation of the draft minutes of 611th MPC meeting to Members, the following proposed amendments to paragraph 35 were received : “35 Mr David C.V. Ngu, Chief Traffic Engineer/Kowloon, supplemented that apart from the above justifications provided by the applicant, the application site was easily accessible to MTR station applicant’s proposal included a connection with the existing subway leading to the nearby MTR station which was within walking distance and therefore the C for T had no objection to the nil provision of carparking spaces the application.” 2. The Committee agreed that the draft minutes of the 611th MPC meeting held on 7.9.2018 were confirmed subject to the above amendments. Agenda Item 2 Matters Arising [Open Meeting] (i) Amendment to Confirmed Minutes of 610th MPC meeting held on 17.8.2018 3. The Secretary reported that an editorial error was found in paragraph 53(b) of the confirmed minutes of the 610th MPC meeting, which should be revised to read as follows: “(b) a proposed development at the “Comprehensive Development Area” (“CDA”) zone to the east of the site had been approved and it would have a total population of about 2,000 flats……” 4. The Committee agreed that the confirmed minutes of the 610th MPC meeting held on 17.8.2018 should be revised to incorporate the above amendment, and the revised minutes would be uploaded to the Town Planning Board website and be sent to the applicant - 4 - accordingly. Tsuen Wan and West Kowloon District Agenda Item 3 Section 12A Application [Open Meeting] Y/KC/14 Application for Amendment to the Draft Kwai Chung Outline Zoning Plan No. S/KC/29, To Rezone the Application Site from “Industrial” to “Other Specified Uses” annotated “Columbarium (2)”, Kwai Chung Town Lot 383, 19-21 Wing Kin Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories (MPC Paper No. Y/KC/14A) 5. The Secretary reported that the application involved a proposed columbarium. The following Members had declared interests on the item: Mr Lincoln L.H. Huang ] being Members of the Private Columbaria Appeal (Vice-chairman) ] Board. Mr Sunny L.K. Ho ] 6. The Committee noted that Mr Sunny L.K. Ho had tendered an apology for being unable to attend the meeting and the applicant had requested deferment of consideration of the application. As the interest of the Vice-chairman was indirect, the Committee agreed that he could stay in the meeting. 7. The Committee noted that the applicant’s representative requested on 6.9.2018 deferment of the consideration of the application for two months in order to allow time to prepare further information to address departmental comments. It was the second time that the applicant requested deferment of the application. Since the last deferment, the applicant had submitted a revised technical assessment and responses to departmental comments. 8. After deliberation, the Committee decided to defer a decision on the application as requested by the applicant pending the submission of further information from the - 5 - applicant. The Committee agreed that the application should be submitted for its consideration within three months from the date of receipt of further information from the applicant. If the further information submitted by the applicant was not substantial and could be processed within a shorter time, the application could be submitted to an earlier meeting for the Committee’s consideration. The Committee also agreed to advise the applicant that two months were allowed for preparation of the submission of further information. Since it was the second deferment and a total of four months had been allowed for the preparation of the submission of further information, no further deferment would be granted unless under very special circumstances. [Ms. Katy C.W. Fung, Senior Town Planner/Tsuen Wan and West Kowloon (STP/TWK) was invited to the meeting at this point.] Agenda Item 4 Section 16 Application [Open Meeting (Presentation and Question Sessions Only)] A/K5/782 Proposed Shop and Services, Eating Place, Office and School (Cookery-related) in “Residential (Group A) 7” Zone, 58 Castle Peak Road, Sham Shui Po, Kowloon (MPC Paper No. A/K5/782C) 9. The Secretary reported that the application was submitted by The Garden Company Limited (The Garden). Kenneth To & Associates Limited (KTA) was one of the consultants of the applicant. The following Members had declared interests on the item: Mr Alex T.H. Lai - his firm having current business dealings with The Garden; and Mr Daniel K.S. Lau - his firm having current business dealings with KTA. 10. Since Mr Alex T.H. Lai and Mr Daniel K.S. Lau had no involvement in the application, the Committee agreed that they could stay in the meeting. - 6 - Presentation and Question Sessions 11. With the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Katy C.W. Fung, STP/TWK, presented the application and covered the following aspects as detailed in the Paper : (a) background to the application; (b) the proposed shop and services, eating place, office and school (cookery-related); (c) departmental comments – departmental comments were set out in paragraph 10 of the Paper. Concerned departments had no objection to or no adverse comment on the application. The District Officer (Sham Shui Po) (DO(SSP)) advised that the Sham Shui Po District Council (SSPDC) discussed the application at its meeting held on 5.9.2017. SSPDC members considered the existing building was a historical landmark of the district as well as the collective memory of the local residents, and expressed concerns on the traffic impact arising from the proposed development; (d) during the first three weeks of the statutory publication periods, a total of 390 public comments were received from the Central and Western Concern Group, The Conservancy Association, Designing Hong Kong Limited, two SSPDC members and individuals. All comments raised objection to and/or concerns on the application, except one comment indicated no view. Major views were set out in paragraph 11 of the Paper; and (e) the Planning Department (PlanD)’s views – PlanD had no objection to the application based on the assessments set out in paragraph 12 of the Paper. The proposed development located at a corner site of a residential cluster and in an area mixed with Government, Institution and Community (GIC) facilities and commercial developments was not incompatible with the surrounding land uses. Although it was not in line with the planning - 7 - intention of the “Residential (Group A)7” (“R(A)7”) zone, the application warranted special consideration as the site had all along been occupied by The Garden for non-domestic use since 1960, and the proposed development could allow most of the key existing uses and activities of The Garden to be continued at the site. Besides, the site was the subject of two planning applications for similar commercial/office development approved by the Committee in 1995. Having considered the special circumstances of the unique history of the site, approval of the application would not set an undesirable precedent for similar applications. Also, the application complied with the Town Planning Board Guidelines No. 5 in that the site was easily accessible and well served by public transport, and concerned departments, including the Buildings Department and the Transport Department, had no objection to or no adverse comment on the application. Since the existing building had been accorded with Grade 2 historic building status, the applicant proposed a preservation-cum-development approach to incorporate the clock, two “bakery chef” logos as well as the concept of large white characters “Garden” with the red band on the new building façade. A display corner of local products and photo records of The Garden bakery history would also be provided in the new building. Both the Commissioner for Heritage’s Office (CHO) and the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) had no objection to the application and recommended to impose an approval condition requiring the preservation and incorporation of the said elements in the design of the new building, if the application was approved. Regarding the adverse public comments, comments of concerned departments and the planning assessments above were relevant. 12. Some Members raised the following questions: Conservation
Recommended publications
  • Old Town Central - Enrich Visitor’S Experience
    C&WDC WG on DC Affairs Paper No. 2/2017 OldOld TTownown CCentralentral 1 Old Town Central - Enrich Visitor’s Experience A contemporary lifestyle destination and a chronicle of how Arts, Heritage, Creativity, and Dining & Entertainment evolved in the city Bounded by Wyndham Street, Caine Road, Possession Street and Queen’s Road Central Possession Street Queen’s Road Central Caine Road Wyndham Street Key Campaign Elements DIY Walking Guide Heritage & Art History Integrated Marketing Local & Overseas Publicity Launch Ceremony City Ambience Tour Products 3 5 Thematic ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Routes For visitors to explore the abundant treasure according to their own interests and pace. Heritage & Dining & Art Treasure Hunt All-in-one History Entertainment Possession Street, Tai Ping Shan PoHo, Upper PMQ, Hollywood Graham market & Best picks Street, Lascar Row, Road, Peel Street, around, LKF, from each Man Mo Temple, StauntonS Street & Aberdeen Street SoHo, Ladder Street, around route Tai Kwun 4 Sample route: All-in-one Walking Tour Route for busy visitors 1. Possession Street (History) 1 6: Gough Street & Kau U Fong (Creative & Design – Designer stores, boutiques 2 4: Man Mo Temple Dining – Local food stalls & (Heritage - Declared International cuisine) 2: POHO - Tai Ping Shan Street (Local Monument ) culture – Temples / Stores/ Restaurant) 6 (Art & Entertainment – Galleries / 4 Street Art/ Café ) 3 7 5 7: Pak Tsz Lane Park 5: PMQ (History) 3: YMCA Bridges Street Centre & ( Heritage - 10: Pottinger Ladder Street Arts & Dining – Galleries, Street
    [Show full text]
  • MPC Paper No. A/H3/436A for Consideration by the Metro Planning Committee on 21.9.2018
    MPC Paper No. A/H3/436A For Consideration by the Metro Planning Committee on 21.9.2018 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE TOWN PLANNING ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO. A/H3/436 Applicant Sheen Honour Limited represented by Llewelyn Davies Hong Kong Ltd. Site 36 Gage Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Site Area About 88.1m2 Lease Inland Lot (IL) 62 S.B ss.2 Plan Approved Sai Ying Pun & Sheung Wan Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/H3/31 Zoning “Residential (Group A)9” (“R(A)9”) - a maximum building height (BH) of 120mPD or the height of the existing building, whichever is the greater - a minimum setback of 1m from the lot boundary fronting Gage Street shall be provided Application Proposed Office, Shop and Services and Eating Place 1. The Proposal 1.1 The applicant seeks planning permission for a proposed 21-storey office development with shop and services/eating place on G/F to 2/F at 36 Gage Street, Sheung Wan (the Site). The Site falls within an area zoned “R(A)9” on the approved Sai Ying Pun & Sheung Wan OZP No. S/H3/31 (Plan A-1) . According to the Notes of the “R(A)9” zone, while ‘Office’, ‘Shop and Services’ and ‘Eating Place’ uses are always permitted on the lowest three floors of the building, planning permission from the Town Planning Board (the Board) is required for ‘Office’ use above the lowest three floors. 1.2 In support of the application, the applicant submitted the following documents: (a) Application form received on 2.3.2018 (Appendix I ) (b) Planning Statement received on 2.3.2018 (Appendix Ia ) - 2 - (c) Further
    [Show full text]
  • Usd3.99 World Landscape Architecture
    WLa 10 WORLD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 $USD3.99 WLa 10 CONTENTS BURNLEY LIVING ROOFS | HASSELL MONKS GARDEN MICHAEL VAN VALKENBURGH ASSOCIATES IGA 2017 BERLIN DESIGN COMPETITION GESKES.HACK LANDSCHAFTSARCHITEKTEN AND MILLS RIVER PARK & GREENWAY | OLIN VIC BRÜCKEN UND INGENIEURBAU GREEN RIVER | OKRA OR TAMBO NARRATIVE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION COMPLEX | NEWTOWN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS POP UP BEER GARDEN | GROUNDSWELL DESIGN GROUP SMITH CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH BUILDING VIETNAM VETERANS COMMERATIVE SERVICE WALL ANDREA COCHRAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SINATRA MURPHY THE REVITALIZATION OF PAK TSZ LANE PARK CROWN SKY GARDEN | MIKYOUNG KIM DESIGN GRAVITY GREEN HENLEY SQUARE | TAYLOR CULLITY LETHLEAN EJBY | ACT LUSTICA BAY | EDSA LONDON 2012 OLYMPIC PARK | LDA DESIGN URBAN CURRENT[S] MARSH LANE | KINNEAR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND+CIVILIZATION COMPOSITIONS, TALLER 301, OPENFABRIC SAILING CLUB | LAND SCULPTOR STUDIO UNIPOL TOWER | FRASSINAGODICIOTTO DRY DOCK PARK | CLUSTER LANDSCAPE AND URBANISM COVER | MONKS GARDEN | IMAGE CREDIT | Elizabeth Felicella WLA 10 The Revitalization of Pak Tsz Lane Park GRAVITY GREEN WLA 10 THE REVITALIZATION OF PAK TSZ LANE PARK GRAVITY GREEN Prelude of the 1911 Chinese Revolution (Xinhai simultaneously, to give the entire space a distinct Revolution) identity, to provide a sequential route for visitors In commemoration of the revolution of 1911 to experience the history and to enhance the (the Chinese bourgeois democratic revolution characters of Pak Tsz Lane laneway. Laneway led by Dr. Sun Yat-sen which overthrew the entrances, enclosed open space and the terraced Qing Dynasty), the Urban Renewal Authority has walkways form a unique space for enjoyment, commenced the Pak Tsz Lane project to celebrate recreational and communal aspiration. Hong Kong’s link to the Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 14 April
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 14 April 2016 7379 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 14 April 2016 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. 7380 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 14 April 2016 PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-CHE THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, S.B.S. THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM, G.B.S., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Conservation Through Public Realm Improvement and Online Platform in the Smart Cultural Triangle Precinct
    Heritage Conservation through Public Realm Improvement and Online Platform in the Smart Cultural Triangle Precinct An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Mateo Carvajal Zhi Hui Peter Nolan Date: March 20th, 2017 Report Submitted to: Sujata Govada Urban Design and Planning Consultants International Institute of Sustainable Urbanisation Hendrik Tieben Chinese University of Hong Kong Holly K. Ault and Roger Y. Lui Worcester Polytechnic Institute Project Number: IQP-RYL-C172 Hong Kong This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract As part of the development of the Smart Cultural Triangle Precinct (SCTP) in Hong Kong, our team worked with Urban Design and Planning Consultants Int’l and the Institute of Sustainable Urbanisation to assess and provide new ideas and visions for the creation of the SCTP. Based on our observations, interviews with professionals, survey results and desk research, we suggest that improvements be made to the pedestrian areas and open spaces within the SCTP. Improving these public areas will help to improve the value of the local built heritage as people become encouraged to explore their local community. We also provided our sponsors with suggestions for online tools to serve as a knowledge exchange platform and a way for visitors to learn and interact with the area and the activities within.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Town Central
    Old Twon Central One Day Tour The whole tour program takes approx. 7 hours. Exact meeting time and place will be per information at time of booking. Tour Program : Possession Street → Tai Ping Shan Street → Chinese YMCA of Hong Kong, Bridges Street Centre → Man Mo Temple → PMQ → Gough Street → Pak Tsz Lane Park → Kung Lee Herbal Tea → Hollywood Road → Tai Kwun → Pottinger Street Possession Street Ordinary as it may seem, Possession Street has a significant place in the history of Hong Kong. On 25 January 1841, the British navy landed at nearby Possession Point and began 150 years of colonial rule. Originally perched on the waterfront, Possession Street was given a new lease of life through r eclamation. The area is now dotted with hip restaurants and boutiques, alongside historic stores where you can still sample a taste of an older Hong Kong. Tai Ping Shan Street Tai Ping Shan Street is part of PoHo, which also includes Po Hing Fong, Pound Lane, Sai Street and Square Street. In contrast to much of the surrounding area, PoHo is a quiet neighbourhood where shops selling hip goods from around the world are nestled between galleries and teahouses; and design studios meet vintage stores in a discreet little bohemian neighbourhood. Chinese YMCA of Hong Kong, Bridges Street Centre Local architecture was greatly enriched when Western and Chinese influences came together during the colonial era. The Bridges Street Centre of the Chinese YMCA of Hong Kong is a case in point.Completed in 1918, the centre is a six-storey blend of Chicago School architecture and Chinese roofing techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheudle of Amendment to the Draft Sai Ying Pun & Sheung Wan
    C&W DC Paper No. 103/2019 - Appendix II SCHEUDLE OF AMENDMENT TO THE DRAFT SAI YING PUN & SHEUNG WAN OUTLINE ZONING PLAN NO. S/H3/32 MADE BY THE TOWN PLANNING BOARD UNDER THE TOWN PLANNING ORDINANCE (Chapter 131) I. Amendments to Matters shown on the Plan Item A1 – Incorporation of the area covered by the approved Urban Renewal Authority Staunton Street/Wing Lee Street Development Scheme Plan No. S/H3/URA1/4 into the Plan. Item A2 – Zoning of the site at 4­10 Shing Wong Street, 16 Wa In Fong West and a portion of Wa In Fong West as “Other Specified Uses” (“OU”) annotated “Cultural, Community, Commercial and Open Space Uses” with stipulation of building height restriction of 4 storeys. Item A3 – Zoning of the sites at 60­66 Staunton Street, 88­90 Staunton Street, 2­2A Shing Wong Street, 2­10 Wa In Fong West, and a portion of Chung Wo Lane and Wa In Fong West as “OU” annotated “Residential, Institutional and Commercial Uses” with stipulation of building height restriction of 4 storeys. Item A4 – Rezoning of the site at 1­12 Wing Lee Street and 17­19 Shing Wong Street from “Comprehensive Development Area” (“CDA”) to “OU” annotated “Residential, Institutional and Commercial Uses” with stipulation of building height restriction of 4 storeys. Item A5 – Zoning of the sites at 8 and 13 Wa In Fong East, 4­6 Chung Wo Lane, Chung Wo Lane Sitting­out Area, the Government land adjacent to 6 Chung Wo Lane, and a portion of Chung Wo Lane and Wa In Fong East as “Residential (Group C)” (“R(C)”).
    [Show full text]
  • Old Town Central
    SELF-GUIDED WALKS CONTENTS 02 Time Travellers Modern-day Hong Kong may be best known for its glossy skyscrapers and world-class 10 attractions, but to understand how the city Crazy for Art became the bustling metropolis that it is today, one only need to pay a visit to Old Town Central. 20 Tasting Hong Kong One of the oldest yet also most dynamic districts in the city, Old Town Central – encompassing the sloped streets and 30 small alleys of Central and Sheung Wan – Treasure Hunt encapsulates Hong Kong’s rich and diverse spirit. A place where century-old temples 38 share the same streets as fashion-forward Highlight Route concept stores, or where authentic tea houses coexist with modern art galleries, this colourful neighbourhood is at once old and new while also being proudly local and unmistakably global. Immensely walkable and brimming with attractions, this neighbourhood is perfect to experience on foot. There’s plenty to discover here, from heritage buildings and art institutions to local eats and fun souvenirs. Whatever your interests are, this guide will lead you to some of the best things that Old Town Central has to offer. Have fun exploring. Disclaimer: Old Town Central is produced by Time Out Hong Kong and published by the Hong Kong Tourism Board. The Hong Kong Tourism Board shall not be responsible for any information described in the book, including those of shops, restaurants, goods, and services, and they do not represent and make guarantees concerning any such information regarding shops, restaurants, goods and services and so on, including commercial applicability, accuracy, adequacy and reliability, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Staunton Street / Shing Wong Street Community Making Study | Table of Contents
    Staunton Street / Shing Wong Street Community Making Study | Table of Contents 27 STAUNTON STREET / SHING WONG STREET COMMUNITY MAKING STUDY 2019 Conducted by: Commissioned by: AUGUST 2019 1 Staunton Street / Shing Wong Street Community Making Study | Table of Contents ABOUT THE STUDY Research conducted by Social Ventures Hong Kong (SVhk) Study Team Francis Ngai Lehui Liang Maria Lam Florence Cheng Edwin Song Acknowledgements Support from members of over 25 organisations added to the breadth and depth of research efforts. For more information about these organisations, see APPENDIX I: Acknowledgements About Social Ventures Hong Kong (SVhk) Founded in 2007, SVhk is an Impact Purpose Organisation (IPO) that innovates social change by re-imagining the city. We focus on inventing and incubating pioneering sustainable business solutions to urban social and environmental challenges. SVhk has incubated, invested in and supported more than 40 ventures. This report has been commissioned by, and prepared for, the Urban Renewal Authority in Hong Kong, as a consultancy study in relation to community making for Staunton Street / Wing Lee Street Development Scheme and its surrounding neighbourhood. Copyright 2019 SVHK Capital Limited. All rights reserved. 2 Staunton Street / Shing Wong Street Community Making Study | Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................................... 4 HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]