DOCSLIB.ORG

ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL014 World Archaeology: the Deep History of Human Societies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Institute of Archaeology Note: Information regarding teaching, learning and assessment in this handbook endeavours to be as accurate as possible. However, in light of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the changeable nature of the situation, and the possibility of updates in government guidance, there may need to be changes during the course of the year. UCL will keep current students updated of any changes to teaching, learning and assessment on the Students’ webpages, which includes Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to help you with any queries that you may have. ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL014 World Archaeology: The Deep History of Human Societies 2020-21, Term 1 Year 1 module – 15 / 30 credits Term 1 co-ordinator: Dr Manuel Arroyo-Kalin ([email protected]) Room 401, UCL Institute of Archaeology. UG Office hours: (09:30-11:00am on Tuesdays) https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/[email protected]/bookings/ Please refer to the online IoA Student Handbook and IoA Study Skills Guide for instructions on coursework submission, IoA referencing guidelines and marking criteria, as well as UCL policies on penalties for late submission. ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL0014 - World Archaeology, Term 1 1. WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY: MODULE OVERVIEW Module description The overarching mission of archaeology is to produce an empirically-grounded historical account of how humankind came to be. This narrative, reaching beyond and before transmitted memories and written histories, is fundamental to discuss who we are as a species; to understand the social institutions that structure how we live; and to decipher the history of the places and landscapes that we have inhabited and transformed over time. World Archaeology offers a broad overview of the global database of empirical observations that underpins this time-deep narrative. Drawing primarily on archaeological research from across the world, it provides a broad-ranging introductory synthesis to the major global patterns of social, cultural, economic, and political change that make up time-deep human history, i.e. from the earliest “prehistory” to the beginnings of the so-called Modern era. During Term 1, the module reviews the evolution of hominins and subsequent human dispersals to all parts of the world. It then examines on a region by region basis some of the key processes that took place during the Holocene: the adoption of sedentism, plant and animal domestication and husbandry, human population growth, and the development of social complexity. During Term 2, World Archaeology focuses on later prehistoric and historic polities, empires and civilizations of Eurasia, Africa and the Americas, as well as their expansion and periodic collapse. It also considers the ‘exploration’ of the globe by Europeans from the 15th century onwards and the socio-economic consequences of such early globalizing connections. If students have queries about the objectives, structure, content, assessment and/or organisation of the module: for Term 1 they should consult Dr Manuel Arroyo-Kalin ([email protected]) for Term 2 they should consult Professor Kevin MacDonald ([email protected]). Module Aim The aim of the module is to provide students with a broad-ranging introductory synthesis of the major patterns of global social, cultural, economic and political change from earliest “prehistory” to the beginnings of the modern era, as can be inferred from archaeological evidence from across the world. Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module students should be able to demonstrate improved skills of observation and critical reflection on archaeological topics that have been covered in seminars and assessed work during each term. Students should be able to map in time and space some of the broad patterns that define global human history and have a good grasp of the processes that have been proposed to explain these patterns. Students should also be able to critically appraise received and popular narratives about time-deep human history and social evolution from the vantage point of up-to-date knowledge about past and ongoing archaeological research. 1 ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL0014 - World Archaeology, Term 1 Methods of Assessment The module is assessed through written essays. For each essay, students are expected to synthesise relevant archaeological literature pertaining to specific topics. There are different weightings for assessment depending on the module students are registered for: ARCL0002 is the module’s 30-credit version– i.e. taken by most students in the first year of their BA or BSc Archaeology [other than the BA in Archaeology and Anthropology]. Assessment during term 1 is based on two c. 1500-word essays, each contributing 25% to the final grade of the 30-credit module. The deadlines for Term 1 are: 9 November 2020 and 14 December 2020. Please note that assignments for the second half of the course (during Term 2) will be made be available at the start of Term 2. ARCL0003 is the 15-credit version of the module running in Term 1 and taken by the BA in Archaeology of Egypt and Sudan, BASc students, Affiliate students, and other non- Archaeology students. For ARCL0003 students the module is assessed by two 1500-word essays, each contributing 50% to the final grade for the module. Deadlines are as above for ARCL0002: 9 November 2020 and 14 December 2020. ARCL0014 is the module’s 15-credit version for BA Archaeology and Anthropology students. Term 1 is assessed by one 1500-word essay, which contributes 50% to the final grade of two terms. The deadline for the essay is 9 November 2020. Please remember that you must submit all assessments to complete and pass this module. Submission of assessments is done by uploading them to the appropriate submission link in the ARCL0002 Moodle page. Week-by-week summary Week Date Topic Lecturers 1 09 Oct 2020 Two Cultures, One Deep History MAK 2 16 Oct 2020 Before us: The origins of the human genus CS 3 23 Oct 2020 Rise, dispersal and social complexity of Modern Humans AG 4 30 Oct 2020 Forging the Neolithic DF, LM, MAK 5 06 Nov 2020 The Neolithic in the Fertile Crescent and Africa KW, KM 6 READING WEEK 7 20 Nov 2020 The Neolithic in Asia DF 8 27 Nov 2020 The Neolithic colonisation of Europe MPP 9 4 Dec 2020 Why the state has no origin DW 10 11 Dec 2020 The “Neolithic” in the Americas MAK 11 18 Dec 2020 Back-sighting: review of Term 1 of World Archaeology MAK Lecturers: Manuel Arroyo-Kalin (MAK), Ceri Shipton (CS), Andrew Garrard (AG), Dorian Fuller (DF), Louise Martin (LM), Karen Wright (KW), Kevin MacDonald (KM), Mike Parker Pearson (MPP), David Wengrow (DW) 2 ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL0014 - World Archaeology, Term 1 Weekly Module Plan Term 1 of World Archaeology is taught by multiple lecturers, each of whom is knowledgeable in one or more fields of archaeology, including regional specialisms. The module, therefore, has many flavours: students should be aware that each participating lecturer may approach their teaching in a slightly different way. On a weekly basis, the module is based on Pre-recorded Lectures, Readings, and Live Seminars. Pre-recorded Lectures introduce weekly topics and are made available via Moodle ahead of each Friday Live Seminar: with their associated essential readings, they provide an indispensable background to the Live Seminars. A Hot Questions link for every weekly seminar can be populated with questions ahead of the Live Seminars themselves, during which lecturers will provide further content related to the lectures (for instance they might unpack specific case studies and use these to highlight in more detail some of the issues introduced via the Pre- recorded Lectures). Students will need engage with content offered in the Live Seminars during the weekly Friday meetings. Lecturers will then ask students to discuss these contents and explore their implications for the broader topics outlined in the pre-recorded lectures. In short, Live Seminars on Fridays are designed to explore contents in more detail, provide an opportunity to ask questions, and allow for broader discussion of each weekly topic. Important: please see the section on Preparation for Class, Basic Texts and Online Resources, below, for further details. Communications The ARCL0002 Moodle page is the main hub of communication for this course. During Term 1, this also includes ARCL0003 and ARCL00014). Important information will be posted by staff in the Announcements Section of the Moodle page - you will automatically receive an email notification for these. Please post any general queries relating to module content, assessments and administration in the Moodle Q&A. The forum will be monitored regularly. For specific queries related to Term 1, book a meeting or contact the coordinator by email. Links to Live Seminars can be found on the ARCL0002 Moodle page Workload The total workload during term 1 is approximately 150 hours. Students will need to devote on average 1 hour per week in order to watch, in their own time, the pre-recorded lecturers plus 2 hours per week in Live Seminars with lecturers, for a total of 30 hours. During the term, students can expect to undertake 60 hours of reading and use 60 hours to produce marked assignments. 2. ASSESSMENT The module is assessed through written essays which must be based on the contents covered in lectures and seminars. Note, however, that you are expected to synthesise relevant archaeological literature (drawn from the module’s reading list, as well as from the literature 3 ARCL0002, ARCL0003, ARCL0014 - World Archaeology, Term 1 cited therein and further afield) in order to discuss specific topics. That is, it is important that you reference and discuss scholarly sources in your essays rather than simply refer to teaching materials. This means you must research the broader literature for scholarly presentation of the concepts, processes, and case studies mentioned in lectures and seminars.
Recommended publications
  • PDF Generated By

    PDF Generated By

    The Evolution of Language: Towards Gestural Hypotheses DIS/CONTINUITIES TORUŃ STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE Edited by Mirosława Buchholtz Advisory Board Leszek Berezowski (Wrocław University) Annick Duperray (University of Provence) Dorota Guttfeld (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Grzegorz Koneczniak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Piotr Skrzypczak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Jordan Zlatev (Lund University) Vol. 20 DIS/CONTINUITIES Przemysław ywiczy ski / Sławomir Wacewicz TORUŃ STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE Ż ń Edited by Mirosława Buchholtz Advisory Board Leszek Berezowski (Wrocław University) Annick Duperray (University of Provence) Dorota Guttfeld (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Grzegorz Koneczniak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) The Evolution of Language: Piotr Skrzypczak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Jordan Zlatev (Lund University) Towards Gestural Hypotheses Vol. 20 Bibliographic Information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. The translation, publication and editing of this book was financed by a grant from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland within the programme Uniwersalia 2.1 (ID: 347247, Reg. no. 21H 16 0049 84) as a part of the National Programme for the Development of the Humanities. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Ministry cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Translators: Marek Placi ski, Monika Boruta Supervision and proofreading: John Kearns Cover illustration: © ńMateusz Pawlik Printed by CPI books GmbH, Leck ISSN 2193-4207 ISBN 978-3-631-79022-9 (Print) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79393-0 (E-PDF) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79394-7 (EPUB) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79395-4 (MOBI) DOI 10.3726/b15805 Open Access: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 unported license.
  • The Krishna Temple Complex, Hampi: an Exploration of Its Identity As a Medieval Temple in the Contemporary Context

    The Krishna Temple Complex, Hampi: an Exploration of Its Identity As a Medieval Temple in the Contemporary Context

    THE KRISHNA TEMPLE COMPLEX, HAMPI: AN EXPLORATION OF ITS IDENTITY AS A MEDIEVAL TEMPLE IN THE CONTEMPORARY CONTEXT A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Ashima Krishna January, 2009 © 2009 Ashima Krishna ABSTRACT Hindu temples in India have been in abundance for centuries. However, many have lost their use over time. They lie vacant and unused on vast tracts of land across the Indian subcontinent, in a time when financial resources for the provision of amenities to serve the local community are hard to come by. In the case of Hampi, this strain is felt not only by the community inhabiting the area, but the tourism sector as well. Hampi’s immense significance as a unique Medieval-city in the Indian subcontinent has increased tourist influx into the region, and added pressure on authorities to provide for amenities and facilities that can sustain the tourism industry. The site comprises near-intact Medieval structures, ruins in stone and archaeologically sensitive open land, making provision of tourist facilities extremely difficult. This raises the possibility of reusing one of the abundant temple structures to cater to some of these needs, akin to the Virupaksha Temple Complex and the Hampi Bazaar. But can it be done? There is a significant absence of research on possibilities of reusing a Hindu Temple. A major reason for this gap in scholarship has been due to the nature of the religion of Hinduism and its adherents. Communal and political forces over time have consistently viewed all Hindu temples as cultural patrimony of the people, despite legal ownership resting with the Government of India.
  • How Homo Became Docens

    How Homo Became Docens

    Knowing, Learning and Teaching— How Homo Became Docens Anders Hogberg,¨ Peter Gardenfors¨ & Lars Larsson This article discusses the relation between knowing, learning and teaching in relation to early Palaeolithic technologies. We begin by distinguishing between three kinds of knowl- edge: knowing how, knowing what and knowing that. We discuss the relation between these types of knowledge and different forms of learning and long-term memory systems. On the basis of this analysis, we present three types of teaching: (1) helping and correcting; (2) showing; and (3) explaining. We then use this theoretical framework to suggest what kinds of teaching are required for the pre-Oldowan, the Oldowan, the early Acheulean and the late Acheulean stone-knapping technologies. As a general introductory overview to this special section, the text concludes with a brief presentation of the papers included. Introduction Homo special and underlined the importance of study- ing why and how the sapient minds learned to learn Homo sapiens is the only extant species that systemat- more extensively than in any other species. Others ically educates conspecifics. In so doing, we help and have focused on related areas like learning and en- encourage our children to gain extraordinary knowl- vironmental adaptation (Shennan & Steel 1999), hu- edge and skills. This enables them to do remark- man ecology, information storage and cultural learn- able things like perceiving complicated patterns that ing (Bentley & O´Brien 2013; Henrich 2004), evolution help them categorize things in the world and learn- of modern thinking and increased working memory ing connections between events that help them per- (Coolidge & Wynn 2009), the emergence of the social ceive causal structures.
  • Lieberman 2001E.Pdf

    Lieberman 2001E.Pdf

    news and views Another face in our family tree Daniel E. Lieberman The evolutionary history of humans is complex and unresolved. It now looks set to be thrown into further confusion by the discovery of another species and genus, dated to 3.5 million years ago. ntil a few years ago, the evolutionary history of our species was thought to be Ureasonably straightforward. Only three diverse groups of hominins — species more closely related to humans than to chim- panzees — were known, namely Australo- pithecus, Paranthropus and Homo, the genus to which humans belong. Of these, Paran- MUSEUMS OF KENYA NATIONAL thropus and Homo were presumed to have evolved between two and three million years ago1,2 from an early species in the genus Australopithecus, most likely A. afarensis, made famous by the fossil Lucy. But lately, confusion has been sown in the human evolutionary tree. The discovery of three new australopithecine species — A. anamensis3, A. garhi 4 and A. bahrelghazali5, in Kenya, Ethiopia and Chad, respectively — showed that genus to be more diverse and Figure 1 Two fossil skulls from early hominin species. Left, KNM-WT 40000. This newly discovered widespread than had been thought. Then fossil is described by Leakey et al.8. It is judged to represent a new species, Kenyanthropus platyops. there was the finding of another, as yet poorly Right, KNM-ER 1470. This skull was formerly attributed to Homo rudolfensis1, but might best be understood, genus of early hominin, Ardi- reassigned to the genus Kenyanthropus — the two skulls share many similarities, such as the flatness pithecus, which is dated to 4.4 million years of the face and the shape of the brow.
  • Edward Sapir and the Origin of Language

    Edward Sapir and the Origin of Language

    EDWARD SAPIR AND THE ORIGIN OF LANGUAGE ALBERT F. H. NACCACHE Archaeology Department, Lebanese University, (ret.) Beirut, Lebanon [email protected] The field of Language Evolution is at a stage where its speed of growth and diversification is blurring the image of the origin of language, the “prime problem” at its heart. To help focus on this central issue, we take a step back in time and look at the logical analysis of it that Edward Sapir presented nearly a century ago. Starting with Sapir’s early involvement with the problem of language origin, we establish that his analysis of language is still congruent with today’s thinking, and then show that his insights into the origin of language still carry diagnostic and heuristic value today. 1. Introduction The origin of language is a challenging problem to focus upon. Language, like mind and intelligence, is a phenomenon that “we find intuitive but hard to define” (Floridi, 2013, p. 601), and a century of progress in Linguistics has only heightened our awareness of the protean nature of language while exacerbating the fuzziness of its definition. Meanwhile, research in the field of Language Evolution is blooming and the sheer variety of available approaches, though highly promising, has blurred, momentarily at least, our perception of the issue at the core of the field: the origin of language. We do not propose a solution to this problem, just an attempt to put it in perspective by looking at it through the writings of a researcher who had nearly no data with which to tackle the issue and could only rely on his analytical abilities.
  • Big History: a Working Bibliography of References, Films & Internet Sites

    Big History: a Working Bibliography of References, Films & Internet Sites

    Big History: A Working Bibliography of References, Films & Internet Sites Assembled by Barry Rodrigue & Daniel Stasko University of Southern Maine (USA) Index Books & Articles on Big History…………………………………………...2–9 Works that Anticipated Big History……………………………………....10–11 Works on Aspects of Big History…………………………………………12–36 Cosmology & Planetary Studies…………. 12–14 Physical Sciences………………………… 14–15 Earth & Atmospheric Sciences…………… 15–16 Life Sciences…………………………….. 16–20 Ecology…………………………………... 20–21 Human Social Sciences…………………… 21–33 Economics, Technology & Energy……….. 33–34 Historiography……………………………. 34–36 Philosophy……………………………….... 36 Popular Journalism………………………... 36 Creative Writing………………………….. 36 Internet & Fim Resources on Big History………………………………… 37–38 1 Books & Articles about Big History Adams, Fred; Greg Laughlin. 1999. The Five Ages of the Universe: Inside the Physics of Eternity. New York: The Free Press. Alvarez, Walter; P. Claeys, and A. Montanari. 2009. “Time-Scale Construction and Periodizing in Big History: From the Eocene-Oligocene Boundary to All of the Past.” Geological Society of America, Special Paper # 452: 1–15. Ashrafi, Babak. 2007. “Big History?” Positioning the History of Science, pp. 7–11, Kostas Gavroglu and Jürgen Renn (editors). Dordrecht: Springer. Asimov, Isaac. 1987. Beginnings: The Story of Origins of Mankind, Life, the Earth, the Universe. New York, Berkeley Books. Aunger, Robert. 2007. “Major Transitions in “Big’ History.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (8): 1137–1163. —2007. “A Rigorous Periodization of ‘Big’ History.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (8): 1164–1178. Benjamin, Craig. 2004. “Beginnings and Endings” (Chapter 5). Palgrave Advances: World History, pp. 90–111, M. Hughes-Warrington (editor). London and New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. —2009. “The Convergence of Logic, Faith and Values in the Modern Creation Myth.” Evolutionary Epic: Science’s Story and Humanity’s Response, C.
  • 27Mykolas Imbrasas Masters Thesis Final.Pdf

    27Mykolas Imbrasas Masters Thesis Final.Pdf

    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Imbrasas, Mykolas Dovydas (2018) Performance of 2D geometric morphometric analysis in hominin taxonomy and its application to the mandibular molar sample from Lomekwi, Kenya. Master of Research (MRes) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/76756/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Performance of 2D geometric morphometric analysis in hominin taxonomy and its application to the mandibular molar sample from Lomekwi, Kenya Mykolas Dovydas Imbrasas Student No. 17905401 School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Project supervisor – Dr. Matthew Skinner Submitted November 2018 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Matthew Skinner for introducing me to the world of hominin dentition, and for providing detailed instruction regarding the current techniques (geometric morphometrics, micro-CT scanning, and software used for visualizing 3D data) used in studies of hominin tooth morphology.
  • Language Evolution to Revolution

    Language Evolution to Revolution

    Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e38546 doi: 10.3897/rio.5.e38546 Research Article Language evolution to revolution: the leap from rich-vocabulary non-recursive communication system to recursive language 70,000 years ago was associated with acquisition of a novel component of imagination, called Prefrontal Synthesis, enabled by a mutation that slowed down the prefrontal cortex maturation simultaneously in two or more children – the Romulus and Remus hypothesis Andrey Vyshedskiy ‡ ‡ Boston University, Boston, United States of America Corresponding author: Andrey Vyshedskiy ([email protected]) Reviewable v1 Received: 25 Jul 2019 | Published: 29 Jul 2019 Citation: Vyshedskiy A (2019) Language evolution to revolution: the leap from rich-vocabulary non-recursive communication system to recursive language 70,000 years ago was associated with acquisition of a novel component of imagination, called Prefrontal Synthesis, enabled by a mutation that slowed down the prefrontal cortex maturation simultaneously in two or more children – the Romulus and Remus hypothesis. Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e38546. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e38546 Abstract There is an overwhelming archeological and genetic evidence that modern speech apparatus was acquired by hominins by 600,000 years ago. On the other hand, artifacts signifying modern imagination, such as (1) composite figurative arts, (2) bone needles with an eye, (3) construction of dwellings, and (4) elaborate burials arose not earlier than © Vyshedskiy A. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
  • Neurohistory Is Bunk?: the Not-So-Deep History of the Postclassical Mind Author(S): Max Stadler Source: Isis, Vol

    Neurohistory Is Bunk?: the Not-So-Deep History of the Postclassical Mind Author(S): Max Stadler Source: Isis, Vol

    Neurohistory Is Bunk?: The Not-So-Deep History of the Postclassical Mind Author(s): Max Stadler Source: Isis, Vol. 105, No. 1 (March 2014), pp. 133-144 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/675555 . Accessed: 16/04/2014 05:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.176.110.146 on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 05:21:01 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions F O C U S Neurohistory Is Bunk? The Not-So-Deep History of the Postclassical Mind By Max Stadler* ABSTRACT The proliferation of late of disciplines beginning in “neuro”—neuroeconomics, neuroaes- thetics, neuro–literary criticism, and so on—while welcomed in some quarters, has drawn a great deal of critical commentary as well. It is perhaps natural that scholars in the humanities, especially, tend to find these “neuro”-prefixes irritating.
  • Stone Axe Technology in Neolithic South India: New Evidence from the Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region) Mideastern Karnataka

    Stone Axe Technology in Neolithic South India: New Evidence from the Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region) Mideastern Karnataka

    Stone Axe Technology in Neolithic South India: New Evidence from the Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region) Mideastern Karnataka ADAM BRUMM, NICOLE BOIVIN, RAVI KORISETTAR, JINU KOSHY, AND PAULA WHITTAKER THE TRANSITION TO AGRICULTURE-and to settled village life-occurred at dif­ ferent times in various parts of the world. Even within the Indian subcontinent, the Neolithic transition did not occur simultaneously across the entire region; rather, Neolithic "pockets" developed at different moments in certain key areas within the subcontinent. One such area is the South Deccan Plateau in South India, where the third millennium B.C. saw the development ofa novel Neolithic way of life that differed in crucial ways from Neolithic lifeways in other parts of the subcontinent (Allchin 1963). This tradition was marked by a particular focus on cattle and by the appearance of specific, perhaps ritual practices that featured the burning of large quantities of cow dung and the resultant creation of ash­ mounds in the landscape (Allchin 1963; Boivin 2004). This unique Neolithic tra­ dition, while still relatively poorly understood compared to Neolithic cultures in Europe and the Near East, has much to offer prehistorians attempting to under­ stand the changes that led to and accompanied domestication and sedentarization. It also has much to offer South Asian scholars who wish to gain a better apprecia­ tion of the changes that led to complexity, political economy, and state-level societies in South India (Boivin et al. 2005; Fuller et al. forthcoming). One key requirement for such studies is a better understanding of the material culture changes that attended the Neolithic transition, as well as the subsequent transition from the Neolithic to the Megalithic or Iron Age (see Table 1 for period designa­ tions and chronology).
  • Origins & Spread of Agriculture in India. Dorian Q Fuller 2008.4.18

    Origins & Spread of Agriculture in India. Dorian Q Fuller 2008.4.18

    Origins & Spread of Agriculture in India. Dorian Q Fuller 2008.4.18 印度的农业起源和传播 Figure 1. The major independent Neolithic zones of South Asia, with selected archaeological sites. For each zones the solid grey outline indicates best guess region(s) for indigenous domestication processes and/or earliest adoption of agriculture. The dashed lines indicates the expanded region of related/derivative traditions of agriculture; selected sites plotted. 图一，南亚各新石器区分布，含主要遗址位置。实线范围为本地驯化的最可能区域或 最早接受农业的区域；虚线为这一传统的传播扩大区域 1. The northwestern zone, with the disjunct area of the Northern Neolithic shown: Mgr. Mehrgarh, Glg. Ghaleghay, Bzm. Burzahom, Gfk. Gufkral. 2. The middle Ganges zone with two possible rice domestication areas: Dmd. Damadama, Lhd. Lahuradewa, Mhg. Mahagara, Kjn. Kunjhun, Snr. Senuwar. 3. Eastern India/Orissan zone: Bnb. Banabasa, Kch. Kuchai, Gpr, Gopalpur, Gbsn. Golabai Sassan. 4. Gujarat and southern Aravalli zone: Ltw. Loteshwar, Rjd. Rojdi, Pdr. Padri, Btl. Balathal, Bgr. Bagor. 5. Southern Indian zone: Bdl. Budihal, Wtg. Watgal, Utr. Utnur, Sgk. Sanganakallu and Hiregudda, Hlr. Hallur, Ngr. Nagarajupalle. 1 Chronological Framework (based on Fuller 2006 Journal of World Prehistory 20: 1-86)印度 新石器－铜石并用时代编年 2 Table 1. Important domesticates in South Asia originating in the Near East 表一，近东起源传入南亚的驯化物种 Species Region and period of Earliest occurrence in Comments 备注 origin South Asia 最早出现 于南亚的地区年代 Wheat(s) Near Eastern fertile Mehrgarh, ca. 7000 BC Mehrgarh finds include Triticum spp.小麦 crescent, 9700-8000 primitive glume wheats BC (Triticum monococcum, T. diococcum) as well as derived free- threshing breadwheats (T. aestivum) Barley 大麦 Near Eastern fertile Mehrgarh, ca. 7000 BC Wild barley also Hordeum vulgare crescent, 9700-8000 reported at Mehrgarh, BC.
  • Music in the Deep History of Human Evolution

    Music in the Deep History of Human Evolution

    Journal of the Royal Musical Association ISSN: 0269-0403 (Print) 1471-6933 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrma20 Music in the Deep History of Human Evolution Shane McMahon To cite this article: Shane McMahon (2018) Music in the Deep History of Human Evolution, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 143:1, 233-242, DOI: 10.1080/02690403.2018.1434355 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02690403.2018.1434355 Published online: 26 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 6 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rrma20 Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 2018 Vol. 143, No. 1, 233–242, https://doi.org/10.1080/02690403.2018.1434355 Review Articles Music in the Deep History of Human Evolution SHANE McMAHON Gary Tomlinson, A Million Years of Music: Te Emergence of Human Modernity. New York: Zone Books, 2015. 362 pp. ISBN 978 19 35 40865 9. Why did a tradition of learned instrumental polyphony emerge in Europe and not, for example, in Mesoamerica? Similarly, why has the music of Bach earned a status unrivalled within the context of global musical cultures while, for example, Aboriginal and other indigenous musical traditions worldwide face the possibility of extinction?1 Kindred questions were central to academic musical thought around the turn of the twentieth century, yet the kinds of answers profered, emerging from the evolutionary-historicist framework of the time and advancing a social Darwinist perspective, are not ones which we might countenance today.2 Such thinking was simple enough in its reasoning: European music, of which that of Bach is exemplary, evolved to ever more complex and sophisticated levels, while the music of native populations evolved little, if at all – a fact attributable perhaps to a stubborn or congenital primitivism on the part of the latter.