One-Bath Pretreatment for Enhanced Color Yield of Ink-Jet Prints Using Reactive Inks
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
molecules Article One-Bath Pretreatment for Enhanced Color Yield of Ink-Jet Prints Using Reactive Inks Wei Ma *, Kezhan Shen †, Shuang Li †, Meichen Zhan and Shufen Zhang * State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China; [email protected] (K.S.); [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (M.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.M.); [email protected] (S.Z.); Tel.: +86-411-8498-6506 (W.M.); +86-411-8498-6265 (S.Z.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 30 September 2017; Accepted: 9 November 2017; Published: 13 November 2017 Abstract: In order to facilely increase the color yield of ink-jet prints using reactive inks, one-bath pretreatment of cotton fabrics with pretreatment formulation containing sodium alginate, glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTA), sodium hydroxide, and urea is designed for realizing sizing and cationization at the same time. The pretreatment conditions, including the concentrations of GTA and alkali, baking temperature, and time are optimized based on the result of thecolor yield on cationic cotton for magenta ink. The mechanism for color yield enhancement on GTA-modified fabrics is discussed and the stability of GTA in the print paste is investigated. Scanning electron microscopey, tear strength, and thermogravimetric analysis of the modified and unmodified cotton are studied and compared. Using the optimal pretreatment conditions, color yield on the cationic cotton for magenta, cyan, yellow, and black reactive inks are increased by 128.7%, 142.5%, 71.0%, and 38.1%, respectively, compared with the corresponding color yield on the uncationized cotton. Much less wastewater is produced using this one-bath pretreatment method. Colorfastness of the reactive dyes on the modified and unmodified cotton is compared and boundary clarity between different colors is evaluated by ink-jet printing of colorful patterns. Keywords: ink-jet printing; cotton modification; one-bath pretreatment; reactive dyes 1. Introduction Ink-jet printing of textiles has developed rapidly in recent years because of its rapid response to fashion patterns and satisfactory printing effects [1–6]. This modern printing is suitable for small-scale production to meet personal demand. In the future, it is largely possible that conventional flat, rotary screen or roll printing techniques will be replaced by ink-jet printing [7–10]. Cotton fibers, owing to their soft, hygroscopic, and ventilative properties, have a prevailing position in the present developments of textile materials [11–16]. Unlike in conventional printing, cotton fabrics need to be pretreated in ink-jet printing with a pretreatment formulation containing a thickener, alkali, and urea, and then dried to remove water prior to ink-jet printing. It is impossible to add regular chemicals into the inks due to special requirements on the ink viscosity, stability, and conductivity [17–20]. Reactive dye-based inks are commonly used to print cotton and other cellulosic fabrics due to their wide shade range and excellent fastness properties. Due to limited reactivity and hydrolysis of the reactive groups during dye fixation step, reactive dyes only have a fixation of 50–80%, resulting in producing a large amount of dye wastewater [21]. Moreover, monochloro-s-triazine dyes with low reactivity are commonly used in ink formulation to meet the requirement for stability, resulting in even low color yield of the prints. Therefore, one of the key problems for ink-jet printing of reactive dyes is the unsatisfactory color yield, which restricts the application of reactive ink-jet printing in producing deep colors [22]. Molecules 2017, 22, 1959; doi:10.3390/molecules22111959 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Molecules 2017, 22, 1959 2 of 13 Many attempts have been made to improve the color yield of reactive ink-jet prints. PretreatmentMany attempts and modification have been made of cotton to improve to increase the color its reactivity yield of reactive and affinity ink-jet prints.between Pretreatment the fibers and and themodification dyes were ofreported cotton to to be increaseeffective methods, its reactivity such andas pretreatment affinity between with gas the plasma fibers [1], and modification the dyes werewith glycidyltrimethylammonium reported to be effective methods, chloride such (GTA) as or pretreatment 3-chloro-2-hydroxypr with gasopyltrimethylammonium plasma [1], modification withchloride glycidyltrimethylammonium [14,23,24], dendrimer compounds chloride (GTA)[4], an ord chitosan 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium [14,25–28]. With these methods, the colorchloride yield [14 of,23 the,24], prints dendrimer was improved compounds to [a4], certai and chitosann extent. [ 14Among,25–28 ].them, With GTA these is methods, an effective the color agent yield for enhancingof the prints color was yield. improved It undergoe to a certains an extent.etherification Among reaction them, GTA with is the an primary effective agenthydroxyl for enhancinggroups of thecolor fibers, yield. and It undergoes the hydrolysis an etherification side reaction reaction also with occurs the primaryduring the hydroxyl cationization groups of process. the fibers, GTA and is the a relativelyhydrolysis cheap side reactionand low alsotoxic occurs chemical during [29]. the Moreover cationization, as it is process. a small GTAmolecule, is a relativelyand its influence cheap and on dyelow toxicpermeability chemical and [29]. colorfastness Moreover, as is it islow. a small Kanik molecule, et al. [23] and used its influence GTA and on sodium dye permeability hydroxide and to modifycolorfastness the cotton is low. fabrics Kanik at et al.room [23 ]temperature used GTA and for sodium 24 h, which hydroxide were to then modify thoroughly the cotton rinsed fabrics and at driedroom temperatureto remove water for 24 from h, which the fabrics. were then The thoroughly obtained rinsedcationized and driedfabrics to were remove used water in ink-jet from the printing fabrics. ofThe reactive obtained inks cationized for enhanced fabrics color were yield. used In in ink-jetthe study, printing cationization of reactive and inks pretreatment for enhanced formulation color yield. pretreatmentIn the study, cationization are separated, and and pretreatment the cationizatio formulationn process pretreatment is long, arewhich separated, makes and the the whole cationization process complex,process is long,and time-and which makes water-consuming. the whole process An complex, additional and cationization time-and water-consuming. step is disadvantageous An additional in practice,cationization which step restricts is disadvantageous its real application. in practice, which restricts its real application. It is found that both GTA cationization and cotton sizing proceed under under alkaline alkaline conditions. conditions. However, the alkali used in the two procedures is different: sodium hydroxide is effective for for GTA GTA cationization and and sodium sodium carbonate carbonate is is commonly commonly used used for for sizing sizing pretreatment. pretreatment. Sodium Sodium hydroxide hydroxide is notis not conventionally conventionally employed employed in pretreatment in pretreatment formulation formulation because because it will it will promote promote hydrolysis hydrolysis of the of reactivethe reactive dyes dyes in ink-jet in ink-jet printing printing and and is isnot not bene beneficialficial for for dye dye fixation. fixation. If If the the cationization and pretreatment procedures are combined, the process will be simpler and there will be significantsignificant time- and water-saving.water-saving. Thus,Thus, inin thisthis study,study, wewe designeddesigned aa one-bathone-bath pretreatment to combine both GTA cationization and and sizing sizing pretreatment. pretreatment. “Sizing” “Sizing” in in this this paper paper refers refers to tothe the surface surface treatment treatment of cottonof cotton with with alginate alginate paste, paste, the the polymeric polymeric compon componentent in in the the pretreatment pretreatment formulation. formulation. With With the method, sodiumsodium alginate,alginate, GTA, GTA, sodium sodium hydroxide, hydroxide, and and urea urea are are uniformly uniformly mixed mixed together together in one in bathone bathfor cotton for cotton pretreatment pretreatment before ink-jetbefore printing.ink-jet prin Figureting.1 showsFigure the1 shows flowchart the offlowchart the ink-jet of printing the ink-jet on printingthe modified on the cotton. modified This papercotton. aims This to paper investigate aims whetherto investigate this method whether is effectivethis method in improving is effective color in improvingyield compared color toyield the previously-reportedcompared to the previously-r two-batheported method two-bath and the influencesmethod and of the pretreatmentinfluences of theparameters, pretreatment including parameters, concentrations including of concentrat GTA andions sodium of GTA hydroxide, and sodium and baking hydroxide, temperature and baking and temperaturetime on the colorand time yield. on The the mechanism color yield. for The color mechanism yield enhancement for color yield and theenhancement stability of and GTA the in stabilitythe pretreatment of GTA in bath the will pretreatment also be studied. bath will In addition,also be studied. a comparison In addition, will be a madecomparison on the surfacewill be mademorphology, on the surface strength, morphology, and thermal strength, properties, and