DOCSLIB.ORG

The Farm Bureau

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Farm Bureau H IDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES HIDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? About the Brennan Center for Justice The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law unites thinkers and advocates in pursuit of a vision of inclusive and effective democracy. Our mission is to develop and implement an innovative, nonpartisan agenda of scholarship, public education, and legal action that promotes equality and human dignity while safeguarding fundamental freedoms. Central to the Center’s Poverty Program is its innovative Legal Services Project — a national, multi-faceted effort to help ensure effective, enduring, and unrestricted civil legal assistance for low-income individuals and communities. The Center actively fights efforts to restrict legal services programs and vocally rebuts the relentless attacks made by their opponents. About The Access to Justice Series This paper is the seventh in a series issued by the Center illuminating the accomplishments of legal services programs throughout the country, and documenting the impact of restrictions recently imposed by Congress on the federally funded Legal Services Corporation. It is the result of extensive investigative reporting by award-winning journalist Patrick J. Kiger in close collaboration with the Brennan Center’s Laura K. Abel, Elisabeth S. Jacobs, Jobina Jones, Leena Khandwala, Ilana Marmon, Kimani Paul-Emile, Amanda E. Cooper, and David S. Udell. The following individuals have been consulted as advisors for this series: Bonnie Allen, William Beardall, Martha Bergmark, Ann Erickson, Victor Geminiani, Peter Helwig, Steve Hitov, Carol Honsa, Alan W. Houseman, Esther Lardent, Linda Perl, Don Saunders, Julie M. Strandlie, Mauricio Vivero, Jonathan A. Weiss and Ira Zarov. For more information, or to order any of the Brennan Center’s publications, contact the Center at: BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW 161 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 12TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013 212 998 6730 FAX 212 995 4550 www.brennancenter.org Acknowledgments The Access to Justice Series is supported by generous grants from the Ford Foundation and the Open Society Institute. THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES B RENNAN C ENTER FOR J USTICE H IDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? X1 THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES HIDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? The seventh installment of the Access to Justice Series, Hidden Agendas: What Is Really Behind the Attacks on Legal Aid Lawyers? shines a bright light on the organizations and individuals responsible for imposing funding cuts and restrictions on civil legal aid lawyers, particularly on those in programs receiving federal funds from the nation’s Legal Services Corporation. These cuts and restrictions directly harm individuals and families unable to afford private counsel, but it is not immediately obvious why anyone would wish these vulnerable people ill. After all, civil legal aid programs have historically represented people for whom many Americans feel tremendous empathy: individuals and families being evicted, deported, exploited by employers, victimized by domestic violence, denied governmental benefits, cheated through consumer fraud, denied fair wages, and more. So, who is trying to take away the lawyers and deny the vulnerable poor their day in court? It is a narrow band of very aggressive advocacy groups closely allied with agribusiness interests and the Religious Right. Those with the highest profile include the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Christian Coalition, the Conservative Caucus, the Family Research Counsel, and the National Legal and Policy Center. Why attack legal aid? These groups say that legal aid pursues a left-wing agenda and helps immoral people, but the attackers’ true agenda is to relax legal protections for workers and to impose the attackers’ particular vision of correct morality on the entire society. This article reveals these motivations, and, more profoundly, illuminates the importance of preserving access to justice, not only for the most vulnerable members of society, but for us all. David S. Udell Director, Poverty Program Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law X2 Copyright© January 2001 by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without permission in writing from the publisher, Brennan Center for Justice, 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10013. THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES B RENNAN C ENTER FOR J USTICE H IDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? TABLE OF CONTENTS THE FARM BUREAU . .5 THE NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER 11 THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT . .15 CONCLUSION . .20 X31 THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES HIDDEN AGENDAS: WHAT IS REALLY BEHIND ATTACKS ON LEGAL AID LAWYERS? Where do low-income Americans — including lawyers of promoting divorce and homosexuality, helping abused women and children in Oregon, elderly victims drug dealers, and putting farmers out of business. One of consumer fraud schemes in Tennessee, and farm critic, Howard Phillips of The Conservative Caucus, workers cheated of their wages in Florida and Maryland complains to Congress that the lawyers are “imbued with — turn when they have serious legal problems and a neo-Marxist ideology of class warfare and socialist cannot afford to hire a lawyer? Each year, more than a objective.” Another critic, Kenneth Boehm, whose million individuals turn to legal aid lawyers at the over National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) pumps out 200 independent non-profits nationwide that receive magazine articles and press handouts called Legal Services federal funding from the Legal Services Corporation Horror Stories, asks, “Are [legal aid lawyers] really representing the poor, or are they pursuing their own political agenda?” Yet another attacker, Family Research Council (FRC) President and sometime United States Presidential candidate Gary Bauer, declares, “[LSC is] a taxpayer-funded deep well for anti-family litigation.” Harry Bell, a board member of the American Farm Bureau Federation (Farm Bureau), likewise denounces LSC as “an unproductive and unnecessary expense for the federal government.” One particularly vehement critic, political fund-raiser and activist Paul Weyrich, goes so far as to describe LSC as “among those government organizations most harmful to our society.” Attacks such as these have inflicted major damage: LSC’s critics mounted a well-financed, highly organized publicity and lobbying effort, and it worked. In 1995, Paul Weyrich (Terry Ashe/TIME/TimePix, reprinted with permission) the critics convinced Congress to slash LSC’s appropriation from $400 million to $278 million, as (LSC). Although these advocates make a profound part of a plan to eliminate the program completely over difference in many people’s lives, since the inception of a three-year period. Thanks to energetic efforts by legal LSC in 1974 the lawyers have been under nearly aid supporters, the organized bar, and sympathetic continuous attack from enemies who consider LSC an members of Congress, LSC’s life has so far been spared, outrage and demand that it be shut down. but just barely. Today, LSC struggles with an Critics denounce LSC as a program run dangerously appropriation of just over $300 million. Even without amok, a haven for ideologically-driven lawyers who use adjusting for inflation, that is less than the program public funding to further their own aims, rather than to had at its disposal in 1981. When the figure is adjusted help low-income people. The critics accuse LSC-funded for inflation, it is less than half of the 1981 allocation. Today, LSC struggles with an appropriation of just over $300 million. Even without adjusting for inflation, that is less than the program had at its disposal in 1981. When the figure is adjusted for inflation, it is less than half of the 2 1981 allocation. THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SERIES B RENNAN C ENTER FOR J USTICE Howard Phillips Howard Phillips is one of LSC’s most dedicated foes. While he was the director of the Office for Economic Opportunity under President Nixon, Phillips nearly succeeded in entirely eliminating federal funding for legal aid. In the following decades, Phillips has drifted away from mainstream conservatism and founded a radical third party, currently called the Constitution Party, which is based on the belief that “the U.S. Constitution established a Republic under God, rather than a democracy.” The following excerpts from Phillips’ September 2000 acceptance speech for the Constitution Party’s Presidential nomination, which included a call for the abolition of LSC, illuminate the views of this vociferous LSC critic: [O]n Day One, as President of the United States, I will officially acknowledge the legal personhood of the unborn child, and appoint — by recess appointment, if necessary — new United States Attorneys who will make it their top priority to work with state and local officials in prosecuting and closing down every abortuary within their jurisdictions. *** [T]he bipartisan Washington political establishment ignores the prohibition on Congress funding any establishment of religion, looking the other way as Congress doles out scores of billions of dollars annually to organizations whose religion is abortion, whose religion is sodomy, whose religion is environmentalism, whose religion is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1996 Republican Party Primary Election March 12, 1996
    Texas Secretary of State Antonio O. Garza, Jr. Race Summary Report Unofficial Election Tabulation 1996 Republican Party Primary Election March 12, 1996 President/Vice President Precincts Reporting 8,179 Total Precincts 8,179 Percent Reporting100.0% Vote Total % of Vote Early Voting % of Early Vote Delegates Lamar Alexander 18,615 1.8% 11,432 5.0% Patrick J. 'Pat' Buchanan 217,778 21.4% 45,954 20.2% Charles E. Collins 628 0.1% 153 0.1% Bob Dole 566,658 55.6% 126,645 55.8% Susan Ducey 1,123 0.1% 295 0.1% Steve Forbes 130,787 12.8% 27,206 12.0% Phil Gramm 19,176 1.9% 4,094 1.8% Alan L. Keyes 41,697 4.1% 5,192 2.3% Mary 'France' LeTulle 651 0.1% 196 0.1% Richard G. Lugar 2,219 0.2% 866 0.4% Morry Taylor 454 0.0% 124 0.1% Uncommitted 18,903 1.9% 4,963 2.2% Vote Total 1,018,689 227,120 Voter Registration 9,698,506 % VR Voting 10.5 % % Voting Early 2.3 % U. S. Senator Precincts Reporting 8,179 Total Precincts 8,179 Percent Reporting100.0% Vote Total % of Vote Early Voting % of Early Vote Phil Gramm - Incumbent 837,417 85.0% 185,875 83.9% Henry C. (Hank) Grover 71,780 7.3% 17,312 7.8% David Young 75,976 7.7% 18,392 8.3% Vote Total 985,173 221,579 Voter Registration 9,698,506 % VR Voting 10.2 % % Voting Early 2.3 % 02/03/1998 04:16 pm Page 1 of 45 Texas Secretary of State Antonio O.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory TEXAS
    252 Congressional Directory TEXAS TEXAS (Population 2000, 20,851,820) SENATORS PHIL GRAMM, Republican, of College Station, TX; born in Fort Benning, GA, July 8, 1942, son of Sergeant and Mrs. Kenneth M. Gramm; education: B.B.A. and Ph.D., economics, Univer- sity of Georgia, Athens, 1961–67; professor of economics, Texas A&M University, College Sta- tion, 1967–78; author of several books including: ‘‘The Evolution of Modern Demand Theory’’ and ‘‘The Economics of Mineral Extraction’’; Episcopalian; married Dr. Wendy Lee Gramm, of Waialua, HI, 1970; two sons: Marshall and Jeff; coauthor of the Gramm-Latta I Budget, the Gramm-Latta II Omnibus Reconciliation Act, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings balanced budget bill and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Act; committees: ranking member, Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs; Budget; Finance; elected to the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat in 1978, 1980 and 1982; resigned from the House on January 5, 1983, upon being denied a seat on the House Budget Committee; reelected as a Republican in a special election on February 12, 1983; chairman, Republican Senate Steering Committee, 1997–2001; elected chairman, National Republican Senatorial Committee for the 1991–92 term, and reelected for the 1993–94 term; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 6, 1984; reelected to each suc- ceeding Senate term. Office Listings http://www.senate.gov/senator/gramm.html 370 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510–4302 .......................... (202) 224–2934 Chief of Staff.—Ruth Cymber. Legislative Director.—Steve McMillin. Press Secretary.—Lawrence A. Neal. State Director.—Phil Wilson. Suite 1500, 2323 Bryan, Dallas, TX 75201 ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 141 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1995 No. 154 Senate (Legislative day of Monday, September 25, 1995) The Senate met at 9 a.m., on the ex- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JUS- Mr. President, I intend to be brief, piration of the recess, and was called to TICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICI- and I note the presence of the Senator order by the President pro tempore ARY, AND RELATED AGENCIES from North Dakota here on the floor. I [Mr. THURMOND]. APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1996 know that he needs at least 10 minutes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The of the 30 minutes for this side. I just want to recap the situation as PRAYER clerk will report the pending bill. The assistant legislative clerk read I see this amendment. First of all, Mr. The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John as follows: President, the choice is clear here what Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: A bill (H.R. 2076) making appropriations we are talking about. The question is Let us pray: for the Department of Commerce, Justice, whether we will auction this spectrum off, which, according to experts, the Lord of history, God of Abraham and and State, the Judiciary and related agen- value is between $300 and $700 million, Israel, we praise You for answered cies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes. or it will be granted to a very large and prayer for peace in the Middle East very powerful corporation in America manifested in the historic peace treaty The Senate resumed consideration of for considerably less money.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You President Trump
    Thank You President Trump conservativeactionproject.com/thank-you-president-trump/ January 13, 2020 January 13, 2020 Washington, DC Dear President Trump, On behalf of the conservative movement, we would like to thank you for the accomplishments your administration has achieved on behalf of the American people. From a booming economy, to stronger protections at the border, to implementing strong protections for the unborn, to nominating constitutionalist judges to the federal bench, you have kept your promises to the voters that elected you. Specifically, we want to applaud you for the following achievements: A booming economy that has unemployment at its lowest level in fifty years, the highest median household income on record, a labor force that has grown by 2.1 million. 1/11 Poverty rates for African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans at record lows, and unemployment among women is at its lowest level in nearly 70 years. Aggressively working to address the opioid crisis. Signing the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 which resulted in more than 6 million American works receiving wage increases, bonuses, and increased benefits. Rolling back nearly 8 regulations for every significant new one and cutting regulatory costs by more than $50 billion. Repealing two particularly onerous regulations: the Obama-era Waters of the U.S. rule, and the Obama-era “Clean Power” Plan, and revoking California’s emissions waiver, all of which cost Americans millions of dollars and thousands of jobs. Withdrawing America from the Paris climate treaty, which saved American families $20,000 a year. Opening up federal lands and offshore areas to fossil fuel development and permitting the pipelines and infrastructure necessary to facilitate further development.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data
    March 2013 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data March 3, 2013 25 men and 10 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 5 men and 2 women Speaker of the House John Boehner (M) Gene Sperling (M) Rep. Raul Labrador (M) Kathleen Parker (F) Joy Reid (F) Chuck Todd (M) Tom Brokaw (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 7 men and 1 woman Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Sen. John McCain (M) Sen. Majority Whip Dick Durbin (M) Cardinal Timothy Dolan (M) Bob Woodward (M) David Sanger (M) Rana Foroohar (F) John Dickerson (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 4 men and 3 women Gene Sperling (M) Sen. Kelly Ayotte (F) James Carville (M) Matthew Dowd (M) Paul Gigot (M) Mayor Mia Love (F) Cokie Roberts (F) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 6 men and 1 woman Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (M) Gene Sperling (M) Rep. Steve Israel (M) Rep. Greg Walden (M) Mark Zandi (M) Stephen Moore (M) Susan Page (F) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 3 women Fmr. Gov. Mitt Romney (M) Ann Romney (F) Bill Kristol (M) Kirsten Powers (F) Fmr. Sen. Scott Brown (F) Charles Lane (M) March 10, 2013 25 men and 13 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 6 men and 3 women Sen. Tim Kaine (M) Sen. Tom Coburn (M) Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (F) Rep. Cory Garnder (M) Joe Scarborough (M) Dee Dee Myers (F) Rep. Marsha Blackburn (F) Steve Schmidt (M) Ruth Marcus (F) Fmr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Caucus. Inc
    The Conservative Caucus.Inc. National Headquarters 450 Maple Avenue East, Vienna, Virginia 22180 (703) 893-1550 i-r July 30, 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR ANDY MESSING30 xr FROM: HOWARD PHILLIPS Please check with Phyllis Schlafly to see whether she thinks it is a good idea for us to proceed with the Stop E.R.A. Action-Gram mailing proposed to us by The Viguerie Company. I do not care one way or the other. If Phyllis thinks it would be a plus, we will do it. If she thinks it would be a minus, we will not. Please advise. Thank you. HP:cj Board of Directors Executive Director National Security Task Force Publications Howard Phillips, Chairman F. Andy Messing, Jr. Brig, General Albion Knight, USA (Ret,) Senate Issues Yearbook Director Peter J. Thomas, Secretary Administrative Vice Chairman Senate Report Lawrence J. Straw, Jr., Treasurer Charles Orndorff Director of Research Grass Roots Richard Derham and Publications Member's Report J, Alan MacKay Field Coordinator Annual Report Monroe Thomas Joyce Runyon Conservative Manifesto National Director Financial Secretary Director of Howard Phillips Peggy Cross Administrative Services Margie Wilkins The Viguerie Company A Direct Mail Advertising Agency . 7777 Leesburg Pike, Fails Church, Virginia 22043;(703) 356-0440 COPY APPROVAL REQUEST Da^fe: 7-30-82 jq. Howard Phillips From: Johnson Enclosed for your review are copies of the package described below. Package Name: stop E.R.A. Package Signer: Howard Phillips Package Components: JL JL Page letter (computer/i398^ 2. reply form (computer/56JpP¥S«) — 3. flyer (description - ) brochure (description ~ x_ 5. BRE/Wfic ' ^ 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Blackwell, Morton: Files Folder Title: Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Georgetown Young Americans for Freedom P.O . Box 3033 Washington, D.C. 20057 (202) 944-1291 Richard J. Mathias Chairman Patrick Mahon Vice-Chairman Kevin Piediscalzi Treasurer Quin Hillyer ~\\~, Secretary Don McLaughlin Program Director . J w~ M -h ~ r ~ ~ Kevin Kime Membership Director ~ Q""'RA,-!/.M'j wi~4~N~- Bridget Brooker Public Relations Brad Seiling Ul v~ Public Relations .ftvl'Al ~ ::,~ ~4 J }- Deroy Murdock Executive Director ~ ~ r r--t-1-ic1~ .M cf)/V/~ - ~ ~ _k~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I w-laf-tvi,-1 C\.v\ w~}P ~,.de - ~ ~ ~ Iv~ wJ2JJ r•JJ..e. '14 ~ t,,11-,/ ~ ~uw/4 ~ w1d w/4J./-1 ~ al ~~ f~~. ~ ~ CnCQ~I~ ~ (;.e_t,.,~1 J-®'M.w.1~ c,W~c.J,__ PAGE 4A / WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2 GOP told to follow FDR's example BY A WASHINGTON TIMES STAFF WRITER policy initiatives even when he knew A lack of grass-roots activism contri­ defensive," - they get to select the The Republicans could suffer "a some of them would fail, Blackwell said. buted strongly to the Democratic con­ terms of battle. , lonely landslide". next year unless they Eisenhower, on the other hand, quickly gressional resurgence in the 1982 "Every election," he said, "is a refer­ can find a way to put their conservative lost his opportunity while retaining his midterm congressional elections, endum on something," and ·conserva, coalition back together in time for the personal popularity, Blackwell said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisible Primary and the 1996 Presidential Nomination
    The Invisible Primary and the 1996 Presidential Nomination Thomas R. Marshall, University of Texas at Arlington The 1996 presidential nominations process will not begin with the first state primaries and caucuses. By January 1996 the candidates had already spent millions of dollars and thousands of days campaigning during the "in­ visible primary." The 1996 nominations race features several new prac­ tices—such as the front-loading of delegate-selection events, and the re- emergence of Washington insiders as the early GOP leaders. For the first time since 1964 the Democrat Party did not face a spirited nominations race. This article reviews the prenomination season for the 1996 presidential race with evidence available by early January 1996. Public Opinion Public opinion remained relatively stable during the 1995 "invisible primary," just as it typically has in recent presidential contests.1 Heavy spending in key primary and caucus states, debates among the candidates, and the entry and exit of candidates all failed to move public opinion polls during 1995. In the absence of saturation media coverage and media labeling of "winners" and "losers" in the early caucuses and primaries, few dramatic poll shifts appeared. The Republicans Throughout 1995, the Gallup Poll reported only slight changes in the first-choice preferences of self-identified Republicans and independents leaning Republicans. Between April 1995 and January 1996, front-runner Bob Dole’s support varied only from a low of 45 percent to a high of 51 percent. Support for Senator Phil Gramm varied only from a low of seven percent to a high of 13 percent.
    [Show full text]