DOCSLIB.ORG

Boston Borough Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boston Borough Council B/14/0329 BOSTON BOROUGH COUNCIL Planning Committee – 10th November 2015 Reference Number: B/14/0329 Application Expiry Date 25 December 2014 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal Description Erection of 76 dwellings, new vehicular access and estate road plus associated garages and infrastructure At: Land off Sibsey Road/Wainfleet Road, Boston, Lincolnshire For: Mrs Alison Lea, Larkfleet Homes Third Party Reps: Parish Fishtoft 66 letters plus a 305 Signature petition Ward Fishtoft Author of Report: Trevor Thompson Date of Report: 29th October 2015 MAIN RECOMMENDATION: REFUSE 1.0 REASON FOR REPORT 1.1 This application has been presented to the Planning Committee because objections have been raised by local residents and from Fishtoft Parish Council. The application has been with us since last year and discussions have taken place with the applicant regarding affordable housing, vehicular access and impact on the setting of the nearby listed buildings. Amended details have been submitted following these discussions. The Committee will undertake a visit to the site on the morning of your meeting. 2.0 PROPOSAL AND BACKGROUND 2.1 The site is of irregular shape, covers approximately 3.75 hectares and fronts onto both Sibsey Road and Wainfleet Road, close to the A52/A16 roundabout. The site is divided into 2 pieces of land by an existing hedge that runs partly along the northern boundary and through the central part of the site. The Pilgrim Hospital at Sibsey Road lies opposite the site to the west and the Burton Inn Public House and Premier Inn at Wainfleet Road lie opposite to the south. The main part of the site is within the open countryside for plan purposes, outside of settlement development limits and approximately 140m from the Boston (Spilsby Road) Conservation Area. The site boundary does however include part of Sibsey Road which lies within the development limits of Boston. There are residential properties fronting both Sibsey Road and Wainfleet Road located within close proximity to the site. 2.2 There are Grade II* and II listed buildings off Wainfleet Road which are close to the application site. These listed structures are the ‘Burton Hall with attached wall’ and ‘stables’. There is also an Anglian Water pumping station along the west corner of the site. 7 B/14/0329 2.3 The application site is located within Flood Zone 3 (High Probability) as defined in the Environment Agency’s Flood Maps and also within a ‘danger for some/danger for most’ flood hazard category with the majority of the site within low probability of tidal or fluvial flooding as identified on this Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. A small part of the south east corner of the site lies within a medium risk of tidal flooding. A number of trees within the site fronting Wainfleet Road are protected by a Tree Preservation Order. 2.4 This application is for full planning permission for the erection of 76 dwellings including affordable homes plus associated infrastructure including estate roads, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) and public open space. The application was originally for 82 dwellings. The proposed residential development will be accessed via a new priority controlled T junction on the A16 Sibsey Road. The new site access junction will include a protected right turn (harbourage) and central refuges on the A16, to allow pedestrian flows. The site also has a frontage onto Wainfleet Road which is marked by a wall approximately 1.5m high with a gated access which serves the field to the rear. It is not proposed to construct a new vehicular access onto Wainfleet Road, only a pedestrian access. The existing brick wall is to remain. 2.5 The application is accompanied by: . Planning, Design and Access Statement . Phase 1 and 2 Geo-environmental Assessment report . Residential Travel Plan . Ecological Scoping Survey . Transport Assessment (as amended) . Heritage Impact Assessment . Significance Assessment . Geophysical Survey . Tree Survey . Flood Risk Assessment 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 There have been no recent planning applications for development on this site though in 1977 two applications to develop different parts of the site for housing were refused (ref B9/0153/77 and B9/0160/77). These applications were refused on the grounds of prematurity, access, (Sibsey Road at that time being a trunk road) and because the site being located outside the area scheduled for development within the approved ‘Boston Town Map’. 3.2 Also, in 2003 an application for residential development (one plot) at the rear of 17 Sibsey Road (abutting the application site to the north) was refused on the grounds that the development did not reflect the character or density of the site and the immediate locality, contrary to Local Plan policies G1 and H2. (Ref B/03/0112). The subsequent appeal was dismissed by the Secretary of State. The Planning Inspector considered that the proposed development to the rear of this property would change the whole character of the locality, not least through the significant increase in density. Furthermore the Inspector considered that the proposal would cause substantial harm to the general character of the area, contrary to Policy G1 and the resultant curtilages would not reflect the current density of development in the area, contrary to Policy H2 (3). 8 B/14/0329 3.3 It should be noted that this decision was made before the NPPF and the ‘presumption in favour of sustainable development’ (as discussed below) which was issued in 2012. 3.4 This application was the subject of pre-application enquiries and correspondence during October/November 2012 and, as a result of the perceived threat to the Wainfleet Road frontage trees, the Planning Committee in February 2013 agreed the service of a Tree Preservation Order. Development Plan 3.5 The statutory development plan for Boston Borough comprises the saved policies of the Boston Borough Local Plan April 1999. S.38 (6) of the Act ‘requires that determination (of planning applications) must be made in accordance with the plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise’. RELEVANT POLICY BACKGROUND 3.6 The majority of the site lies within countryside, in an area where new development is strictly controlled unless the proposed development is supported by other development plan policies. A small part of the site includes part of Sibsey Road which lies within the settlement limits. There are no specific policies which support this application and therefore this development is not in accordance with the development plan. Relevant Local Plan policies are as follows: . Policy G1 – Amenity (This policy seeks to resist development that will harm the amenity of nearby residents or the general character of the area). Policy G2- Wildlife and landscape resources ( This policy resists development that will have a significant adverse impact upon existing landscape, wildlife and vegetation resources) . Policy G3 – surface and foul water disposal (This policy seeks to resist developments that do not provide satisfactory drainage provision). Policy G4- safeguarding the water environment (This policy indicates that permission will not be granted for developments which will have an adverse effect on the water environment or the quality of surface or ground water). Policy G6 – Vehicular and pedestrian access (This policy seeks to resist development that would harm highway safety). Policy CO1- Development in the Countryside. (This would not permit development in the open countryside unless it is supported by other local plan policies.) . Policy T1- New accesses onto major roads (This policy indicates that on all class A roads in the built up area of Boston, a new access or junction will not be permitted unless it is a replacement of an existing one to be closed or it can be demonstrated that there will be no adverse effects on the safety and the capacity of the road) 9 B/14/0329 . Policy T2 –Roads and footpaths in new developments (This policy would not allow the construction of new roads and footpaths unless the scheme meets the requirements of all users including those in public transport, car, cyclists and pedestrians). Housing policies . Policy H2 – windfall housing development (This policy allows new housing schemes within urban areas subject to certain criteria being met relating to density, layout etc). Note: As indicated above, the majority of the site lies within countryside and not within an ‘urban area’ . Policy H3 – Quality of housing developments (The objective of this policy is to improve the design of quality of new housing schemes) . Policy H4 – Open space on housing estates (This policy requires 7.5% of the site area to be devoted to suitably located public open space and children’s play areas). National Planning Policy Framework (2012) 3.7 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2012 indicates that housing applications should be considered in the context of the presumption in favour of sustainable development. The NPPF seeks the speedy approval of proposals that accord with the development plan and, where the plan is “absent, silent or relevant policies are out of date”, to grant permission unless the adverse impact would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits; or that policies in the NPPF indicate development should be restricted. 3.8 The NPPF also states that ‘relevant policies for the supply of housing should not be considered to be up-to-date if a five year supply cannot be demonstrated’ (NPPF, para 49). Thus, if there is no five year supply, relevant housing policies are considered out of date and therefore developments would be subject to paragraph 14 of the NPPF which provides a presumption in favour of such development, subject to criteria. 3.9 The weight to be afforded to development plan policies relies to a great extent on whether a five –year supply of deliverable housing sites can be demonstrated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LINCOLNSHIRE. 9 Holland County Council Meet at Boston and Spalding, Alternately
    --·-- DmEC'rORY.] LINCOLNSHIRE. 9 Holland County Council Meet at Boston and Spalding, alternately. Chairman-George Francis Barrell, Mercia lodge, Spalding. Vice-Chairman-John Cabourn Simonds, Manor house, Fishtoft. ALDERMEN. Retire 7th Nov. x8gx. Retire 7th Nov. 1894. Bicheno Henry Smith, Gosberton Barrell George Francis, Mercia lodge, Spalding (chairman) Botterill Charles, xo Cheyney street, Boston Bedford William, Phrenix mills, Boston Lee James Jacob, The Grange, Fishtoft Pickworth John, London road, Spalding Merry Robert, High street, Holbeach Shadford Major, 21 Market place, Spalding Mills William Henry, 14 London road, Spalding Staniland Robert William, High street, Boston Small Waiter Thos. 15 Market place, Boston Weightman William, 31 West street, Boston White Philip, Market place, Long Sutton Winfrey Richard Francis, High street, Long Sutton CoUNCILLORS. Names & Addresses Names & Addresses Electoral Division. of Councillors. Electoral Division. of Councillors. Boston Borough :­ Holland Fen ............... Charles Wm. Hand, Sutterton fen No. x .••...•.••••.•.•.. John Millington Simpson, 6 5 Spilsby Kirton ........................ Joshua Aspland, Holme, Kirton road, Skirbeck Leake ........................ Samuel Brookes, Leake No. 2 ..................Frank Harrison,46 High street, Boston Long Sutton :- No. 3 .................. Harry Alonzo Everitt,43 Sleaford road North ..................... George Skelton J.P. The Limes No. 4 .................. J. Beaulah, Spilsby road South ..................... John Dring, Brunswick mill No.
    [Show full text]
  • 16676 the LONDON GAZETTE, 26Xn OCTOBER 1990
    16676 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 26xn OCTOBER 1990 M. L. Smith, Newbridge Farm, Trustee Farms, Wainfleet All R. Harness, Portland House, Tattershall, Lincoln. 2 million Saints, Skegness PE247 4LB. 2 million gallons. Wainfleet All gallons. Coningsby. Between TF 216533 and TF 213549. Saints. Between TF 439592 and IF447591. Between TF 443598 E. S. Harrison & Son, The Willows, Haven Bank, New York, and TF453599. At TF441597. Between TF440596 and Lincoln. 3 million gallons. Coningsby and Wildmore. Between TF 445595. Between TF 439594 and TF 446594. Between TF 239532 and TF 237534. Between TF 261542 and TF 263539. TF439593 and TF446593. At TF443598. Between TF445597 At TF219534, At TF216536. At TF275531. andTF450597. Ivy Dene Fanners, Ivy Dene Farm, Langrick, Boston PE22 Thorpe Bank Farming Company, Estate Office, Leverton, 7AG. 5 million gallons. Frithville. Between TF 303473 and Boston, Lincolnshire. 10-160 million gallons. New Leake and TF 312471. Toynton All Saints. Between TF 39006025 and TF 40956025. Between TF39855845 and TF40655875. At TF39206020. At W. P. & H. Laird & Sons, Providence Farm, New York, TF39766020, TF40006020, TF40306020, TF41006020 and Lincoln. 6 million gallons. Wildmore. Between TF 248545 and TF 39806020 and land occupied by Thorpe Bank Farming TF 261549. Company. J. N. Maidens, Ferndale, Carrington Road, Frithville, H. E. Tinsley Ltd., The Grange, Langrick, Boston, Boston PE22 7DY. 1,112,500 gallons. Frithville. Between Lincolnshire. 7-7 million gallons. Midville and Sibsey. Between TF313506 and TF315506. Between TF314506 and TF314504. TF 383570 and TF387592. Between TF383570 and TF 352567. Between TF322505 and-TF321507. Between TF 387581 and TF 371581. Between TF 387592 and J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Field Evaluations East Midlands LINCOLNSHIRE Boston 2/55 (C.32.O043) TF 33974383 PE21 0EE FORBES ROAD CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH Forbes Road Congregational Church, Boston, Lincolnshire Rylatt, J Lincoln : Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd., 2003, 22pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd. Trial trenches were excavated at the site. No features were encountered but medieval and post- medieval finds were recovered. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/56 (C.32.O048) TF 32764341 PE21 8TJ LAND AT 138-142 HIGH STREET, BOSTON Archaeological Evaluation on Land at 138-142 High Street, Boston, Lincolnshire Snee, J Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 54pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Project Services Trial trenches were excavated on the site. River bank deposits dating from the medieval period to the 17th century were identified. The land was reclaimed in the 18th century and dumping deposits were identified for this period. Cellars and building structures were identified dating to the 19th century. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/57 (C.32.O003) TF 40905009 PE22 9LE LAND AT HADWICK MOTORS, CHURCH ROAD, OLD LEAKE Land at Hardwick Motors, Church Road, Old Leake, Lincolnshire Hall, R Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 26pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Pre-Construct Archaeology Ltd. Evaluation trenches were excavated on the site. Two undated ditches, an infilled dyke and a post- medieval pit were identified. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM, UD 2/58 (C.32.O040) TF 42395087 PE22 9AQ LAND AT THE ANGEL INN Land at The Angel Inn, Church End, Wrangle, Lincolnshire Bradley-Lovekin, T Sleaford : Archaeological Project Services, 2003, 32pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Archaeological Project Services Two trial trenches were excavated at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Decision List Pdf 189 Kb
    BOSTON BOROUGH COUNCIL DELEGATED DECISION LIST FOR PERIOD 21nd December 2015 TO 22 January 2016 - FOR NOTING SUBJECT: PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND RELATED MATTERS REPORT BY: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER Proposal: Application under s.96A for a non-material amendment to approval B/13/0409 (Erection of a detached store) Construct open sided and front ended lean-to at side of existing detached store Location: MORLEY HOUSE, Morley Lane, Bicker, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE20 3DP Applicant: Mr & Mrs DeBenedictis Decision: Approved Non-material Decision 23-Dec-2015 Amendments Date: Reason for refusal (if applicable): Parish: Bicker Parish Council Application B/13/0409/NMA Case Stuart Thomsett Number: Officer: ………………………………………………………………………………………...... Proposal: Application under section 211 for works to trees in a conservation area for the removal of 2 no. Elm Trees and replacement with more appropriate species Location: 1, Skirbeck Gardens, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE21 0DH Applicant: Dr Gyula Well Decision: GRANT Decision 11-Jan-2016 Date: Reason for refusal (if applicable): Parish: Boston Town Area Committee Application B/15/0495 Case Trevor Feary Number: Officer: ………………………………………………………………………………………...... Proposal: Application under section 211 for works to trees in a conservation area to include: T1 Cherry - Reduce by one third T2 Indian Bean - Reduce by one third T3 Zelcova - Reduce by one third Location: 7, Skirbeck Gardens, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE21 0DH Applicant: Mrs Stella Harpley Decision: TREE PRESERVATION Decision 07-Jan-2016 ORDER NOT ISSUED Date:
    [Show full text]
  • May Patient Experiences 2017 ­ Healthwatch Hub ­ Healthwatch Lincolnshire
    6/16/2017 May Patient Experiences 2017 ­ Healthwatch Hub ­ Healthwatch Lincolnshire Healthwatch Lincolnshire Unit 12 1-2 North End Swineshead BOSTON Lincolnshire PE20 3LR May Patient Experiences 2017 This report has been produced by Healthwatch Lincolnshire to highlight the patient, carer and service user health and care experiences shared with us for the period 1 to 31 May 2017. During this period we received a total number of 151 experiences, 53 of these have been posted directly to our feedback centre (to read individual comments regarding individual providers please visit www.healthwatchlincolnshire.co.uk and select relevant provider details), with the remaining 98 being contained in this report. Healthwatch Lincolnshire has consistently over the past 3 years reported concerns raised with us by patients about length of waits to get an appointment with their GP. In May we have again received a number of comments on this subject but the situation appears to be getting worse, 2 examples of the experiences we have received (from di䬁erent areas of the county) are: Patient went to see if they could get an appointment with GP at 7.30am there were 7 people in front of the patient and 40 people behind. Patient did not get an appointment, they wanted some advice about their condition. Couldn't see GP so went to Urgent Care at Skegness Hospital instead to see if they could give advice. Patient experienced trying to make an appointment with their GP very di쬅cult. Called at one point 186 times to make an appointment, when reception answered no immediate appointment available.
    [Show full text]
  • RCPCH Membership Data East of England Area
    700 600 Consultant 500 ST1 - 4 + Fys 400 ST5 - 8 + staff grade 300 Retired 200 Medical student 100 Academic 0 GP Age Position Leicester Royal Infirmary Queen's Medical Centre Addenbrookes Hospital Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Lister Hospital Luton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Queen's Hospital Nottingham City Hospital Peterborough City Hospital Watford General Hospital Northampton General Hospital Royal Derby Hospital Location with most members Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust All locations Princess Alexandra Hospital Lincoln County Hospital Luton & Dunstable Hospital Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Broomfield Hospital Colchester General Hospital University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Derbyshire Children's Hospital West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust Pilgrim Hospital University of Cambridge Kings Mill Hospital University of Nottingham Hinchingbrooke Hospital Kettering General Hospital Southend Hospital University of Leicester Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust Glenfield Hospital Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Ipswich Hospital Queen Elizabeth II Hospital West Suffolk Hospital Chesterfield Royal Hospital Queen's Hospital Basildon Hospital Bedford Hospital Ipswich Hospital NHS
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Prepared by: ................................ Checked by: .............................. Roy Lobley Richard Ramsden Associate Director Senior Engineer Approved by: ........................... Andy Yarde Regional Director Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final to client RR AY April 2011 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60034187 Reference RE01 Date Created October 2010 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\50016i boston sfra (revision)\reports\boston sfra final march11.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Development Planning...................................................................................................................................................... 9 East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Your Hospital
    Choosing your hospital Lincolnshire Primary Care Trust For most medical conditions, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment. This booklet explains more about choosing your hospital. You will also find information about the hospitals you can choose from. Second edition December 2006 Contents What is patient choice? 1 Making your choice 2 How to use this booklet 3 Where can I have my treatment? 4 Your hospitals A to Z 7 Your questions answered 33 How to book your appointment 35 What do the specialty names mean? 36 What does the healthcare jargon mean? 38 Where can I find more information and support? 40 How do your hospitals score? 41 Hospital score table 46 What is patient choice? If you and your GP decide that you need to see a specialist for more treatment, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment from a list of hospitals or clinics. Why has patient choice been introduced? Research has shown that patients want to be more involved in making decisions and choosing their healthcare. Most of the patients who are offered a choice of hospital consider the experience to be positive and valuable. The NHS is changing to give you more choice and flexibility in how you are treated. Your choices Your local choices are included in this booklet. If you do not want to receive your treatment at a local hospital, your GP will be able to tell you about your choices of other hospitals across England. As well as the hospitals listed in this booklet, your GP may be able to suggest community-based services, such as GPs with Special Interests or community clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacman TEMPLATE
    Updated October 2019 National Cardiac Arrest Audit Participating Hospitals The total number of hospitals signed up to participate in NCAA is 194. England Birmingham and Black Country Non-participant New Cross Hospital The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Participant Alexandra Hospital Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Birmingham Heartlands Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust City Hospital Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust Good Hope Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Hereford County Hospital Wye Valley NHS Trust Manor Hospital Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust Russells Hall Hospital The Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust Sandwell General Hospital Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust Solihull Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Worcestershire Royal Hospital Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Central England Participant George Eliot Hospital George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust Glenfield Hospital University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Kettering General Hospital Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Leicester General Hospital University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester Royal Infirmary University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Northampton General Hospital Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust Hospital of St Cross, Rugby University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust University Hospital Coventry University
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking New Opportunies
    A 37 ACRE COMMERCIAL PARK ON THE A17 WITH 485,000 SQ FT OF FLEXIBLE BUSINESS UNITS UNLOCKING NEW OPPORTUNIES IN NORTH KESTEVEN SLEAFORD MOOR ENTERPRISE PARK IS A NEW STRATEGIC SITE CONNECTIVITY The site is adjacent to the A17, a strategic east It’s in walking distance of local amenities in EMPLOYMENT SITE IN SLEAFORD, THE HEART OF LINCOLNSHIRE. west road link across Lincolnshire connecting the Sleaford and access to green space including A1 with east coast ports. The road’s infrastructure the bordering woodlands. close to the site is currently undergoing The park will offer high quality units in an attractive improvements ahead of jobs and housing growth. The site will also benefit from a substantial landscaping scheme as part of the Council’s landscaped setting to serve the needs of growing businesses The site is an extension to the already aims to ensure a green environment and established industrial area in the north east resilient tree population in NK. and unlock further economic and employment growth. of Sleaford, creating potential for local supply chains, innovation and collaboration. A17 A17 WHY WORK IN NORTH KESTEVEN? LOW CRIME RATE SKILLED WORKFORCE LOW COST BASE RATE HUBS IN SLEAFORD AND NORTH HYKEHAM SPACE AVAILABLE Infrastructure work is Bespoke units can be provided on a design and programmed to complete build basis, subject to terms and conditions. in 2021 followed by phased Consideration will be given to freehold sale of SEE MORE OF THE individual plots or constructed units, including development of units, made turnkey solutions. SITE BY SCANNING available for leasehold and All units will be built with both sustainability and The site is well located with strong, frontage visibility THE QR CODE HERE ranging in size and use adaptability in mind, minimising running costs from the A17, giving easy access to the A46 and A1 (B1, B2 and B8 use classes).
    [Show full text]
  • Pilgrim Hospital Newapproachfocused Report
    Pilgrim Hospital Quality Report Pilgrim Hospital Boston Sibsey Road Boston Lincolnshire PE21 9QS Tel: 01205 364801 Date of inspection visit: 7 January 2020 Website: www.ulh.nhs.uk Date of publication: 27/02/2020 This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this location. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected and a review of all information available to CQC including information given to us from patients, the public and other organisations Ratings Overall summary We carried out an unannounced focused inspection of and experience to keep patient's safe from avoidable the emergency department at Pilgrim Hospital, Boston harm and to provide the right care and treatment, relying on 7 January 2020, in response to concerning information on substantial numbers of bank and agency staff. we had received about the care of patients in this However, managers continually reviewed staffing levels department. At the time of our inspection the and skill mix, and gave bank and agency staff a full department was under adverse pressure. We did not induction. inspect any other core service or wards at this hospital. Some staff did not treat patients with compassion and During this inspection we inspected using our focused kindness nor did they respect their privacy and dignity. inspection methodology. We found that: The crowded nature of the department resulted in some The department was too small for the number of patients conversations taking place with other patients present. attending. This impacted on how patient flow could be Patients could not always access the service when they managed.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 27, 1877. No. 24526. S
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 27, 1877. 6805 parish immediately adjoining thereto, at his centre of the said Boston and Wainfleet residence. public highway. And notice is hereby further given, that on or A Tramway No. 2, situate wholly in the parish before the 21st day of December next printed of Wrangle aforesaid, and commencing by copies of the Bill for effecting the objects afore- a junction with Tramway No. 1, at the said will be deposited in the Private Bill Office of point of termination of that tramway, and the House of Commons. terminating at or near the north-east Dated this 14th day of November, 1877. corner of a field, in the occupation of John William Toogood, 16, Parliament-street, Idle, abutting on the junction of the public "Westminster; highways known respectively as Ivery-lane H. Smith, 33, Norfolk - street, Strand, and Wainfleet-road. London; A Tramway No. 3, situate wholly in the . Solicitors. parish of Skirbeck aforesaid, and com- Toogood and Ball, 16, Parliament-street, mencing by a junction with Tramway No. Westminster, Parliamentary Agents. 1, at Burton-corner, at or near a point in the Wainfleet-road five feet or thereabouts In Parliament.—Session 1878. north of the southern gate-post of the half- Ross and Ledbury Railway. penny toll-bar there, and terminating at or (Extension of Time for completion of "Works; near the centre of the Spilsby-road, 66 Amendment of Act.) feet or thereabouts north-east of the north- OTICE is hereby given, that the Ross and eastern corner of Prospect-place. N Ledbury Railway Company intend to apply A Tramway No.
    [Show full text]