1986 ACL Membership List
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Conference Programme
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Conference Programme WORKSHOP DAY (MONDAY 22nd JULY) – see separate programme(s) DAY 1: TUESDAY 23rd JULY 9:00-11:00 Registration Faraday Building Foyer 10:45-11:00 Opening of the conference Faraday Lecture Theatre 11:00-12:00 Plenary session: Michael Hoey (with Matthew Brook O’Donnell) The textual dimensions of Lexical Priming Faraday Lecture Theatre Chair: Tony McEnery 12:00-1:00 Discourse #1 Stylistics Grammar #1 Lexis and lexicography #1 Frankland Lecture Theatre Cavendish Lecture Theatre Frankland Colloquium Room Cavendish Colloquium Room Chair: Marina Bondi Chair: Mike Scott Chair: Stefan Evert Chair: Tony McEnery Lan-fen Huang Jonathan Culpeper, Jane Anna Čermáková, František Petra Storjohann A complementary approach to Demmen Čermák Lexical, corpus-methodological corpus study: a text-based Using lockwords to investigate It was X that type of cleft and lexicographic approaches to exploration of the factors in the similarities in Early Modern sentences and their Czech paronyms (non-)use of discourse markers English drama by Shakespeare equivalents in InterCorp and other contemporaneous playwrights Matthew Peacock Michaela Mahlberg, Kathy Katrin Menzel Isabella Chiari Stance adverbials in research Conklin A corpus linguistic study of Basic vocabulary and absolute writing Reading Dickens’s characters: ellipsis as a cohesive device homonyms: a corpus-based investigating the cognitive evaluation reality of patterns in texts 1 DAY 1: TUESDAY 23rd JULY (cont’d) 1:00-2:00 Lunch County Dining Room / County Lecture -
The Senate of York University Notice of the 604Th Meeting of Senate To
The Senate of York University Notice of the 604th Meeting of Senate to be held at 3:00 pm. on Thursday, May 22, 2014 in the Senate Chamber, N940 Ross Building. AGENDA Page 1. Chair's Remarks (R. Mykitiuk) 2. Minutes of the Meeting of April 24, 2014 .................................................................................... i 3. Business Arising from the Minutes 4. Inquiries and Communications 4.1 Senators on the Board of Governors re: Board Meeting of April 28 (A. Belcastro / M. Lockshin – Synopsis attached) .................................................................................................................. 1 5. President’s Items (M. Shoukri) 6. Committee Reports 6.1 Executive (A. Asif) ............................................................................................................ 3 6.1.1 Nominees for Election to Senate Committees 6.2 Academic Standards, Curriculum and Pedagogy (L. Sanders) .............................................. 5 6.3 Academic Policy, Planning and Research (Acting Chair) ................................................... 38 6.3 Awards (D. Leyton Brown) ................................................................................................ 127 Note: APPRC items include a report on academic planning discussions with the Deans, Principal and University Librarian concluded in April. 7. Other Business Harriet Lewis, Secretary Consent Agenda 6.2.1 Addition of a Full-Time Option for the Tax Law Specialization within the Professional LLM Program , Graduate Studies 6.2.2 Changes to Admission and Program Requirements for the MSc and PhD Programs in Chemistry, Graduate Studies 6.2.3 Addition of a New Test to Satisfy Language Proficiency Admission Requirements, Glendon 6.2.4 Change to the Requirements of the JD Program, Osgoode Hall Law School 6.2.5 Changes to Requirements for the PhD Program in Social & Political Thought, Faculty of Graduate Studies The Senate of York University Minutes of the meeting held at 3:00 pm on Thursday, April 24, 2014 in the Senate Chamber, N940 Ross Building. -
The Next Digital Decade Essays on the Future of the Internet
THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET Edited by Berin Szoka & Adam Marcus THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET Edited by Berin Szoka & Adam Marcus NextDigitalDecade.com TechFreedom techfreedom.org Washington, D.C. This work was published by TechFreedom (TechFreedom.org), a non-profit public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C. TechFreedom’s mission is to unleash the progress of technology that improves the human condition and expands individual capacity to choose. We gratefully acknowledge the generous and unconditional support for this project provided by VeriSign, Inc. More information about this book is available at NextDigitalDecade.com ISBN 978-1-4357-6786-7 © 2010 by TechFreedom, Washington, D.C. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Cover Designed by Jeff Fielding. THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE: ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 7 Berin Szoka 25 Years After .COM: Ten Questions 9 Berin Szoka Contributors 29 Part I: The Big Picture & New Frameworks CHAPTER 1: The Internet’s Impact on Culture & Society: Good or Bad? 49 Why We Must Resist the Temptation of Web 2.0 51 Andrew Keen The Case for Internet Optimism, Part 1: Saving the Net from Its Detractors 57 Adam Thierer CHAPTER 2: Is the Generative -
1985 ACL Membership List
1985 ACL MEMBERSHIPLIST Following is a listing of the 1985 John Algeo Don D. Anderson Yigal Arens members of the Association for English 12902 Old Chapel Rd Computer Science Computational Linguistics as of 3 University of Georgia Bowie, MD 20715 Univ. of Southern California December 1985. Personal members Athens, GA 30602 Gary Anderson SAL 200 are listed first, ordered alphabetically Syed S. All Board of Governors Los Angeles, CA 90089 by last name. Institutional members 3408-108 Street Federal Reserve System Anthony Aristar follow, ordered alphabetically by Edmonton, Alberta 20th & Constitution Ave NW 343 Alexander Hamilton country, province (for Canada), city, CANADA T6J 2V4 Washington, DC 20551 San Antonio, TX 78228 and then institutional name; for the Yawar All Lee S. Anderson Douglas John Arnold United States, the sorting is by 190 Lees Avenue, No.2107 Rt 6 Box 616 Languages and Linguistics ZIP-code. Ottowa, K1S 5L5, CANADA Sails, MD 21801 University of Essex Wanted: Addresses for the John C. Alleman Lowell Anderson Wivenhoe Park, Colchester members whose names appear Essex, CO4 3SQ, ENGLAND below. Information should be LDS Church Translation 8225 S. 128th Street forwarded to the ACL Secretary- 50 East North Temple Seattle, WA 98178 S. Pal Asija Treasurer. Salt Lake City, UT 84150 Jozsef Andor 7 Woonsocket Avenue Zrinyi u.l.ll.em.14 Shelton, CT 06484 Eduardo Arancibio Bradley Allen H-7621 Pecs, HUNGARY Victor Askman Kamilla Lindstrom Inference Corporation 1815 Higdon Avenue, No.2 Guy Rondeau 5300 W. Century Boulevard John H. Andreae Moutain View, CA 94043 David G. Stallard Los Angeles, CA 90045 Electrical Engineering David J. -
Uncorrected Proofs - 198 Interview with Geoffrey Sampson
A two-way exchange between syntax and corpora Inhiscontribution,GeoffreySampson,ProfessorEmeritusattheUniversity ofSussex(UnitedKingdom),highlightstherelationshipbetweenCorpusLin- guisticsandSyntax.Heshowshowthisbondhasatwo-waynature.Inhisview, theuseofcorporainlanguageresearchallowsonetobetterunderstandsyntac- ticissuesandthedevelopmentoflanguagecomplexity.However,theotherway isalsotrueinSampson’sviewsincehebelievesthefocusonsyntaxisoneofthe majorfactorscontributingtothegrowthofinterestinCorpusLinguistics.From amoregeneralperspective,Sampsonarguesinfavoroflinguisticsremaining acreativeactivitywhichdevelopsinunexpectedways.Asfortheprospectsof CorpusLinguistics,hepredictsitsdeath–notofthisapproachitself,butof theterm.Hebelievesthelabel‘corpuslinguistics’willdisappearwhencorpora becomejustanotherresourceavailabletolinguists. 1. Where do you place the roots of Corpus Linguistics? And to what do you attribute the growth of interest in the area? 2. Is Corpus Linguistics a science or a methodology? Where would you situate Corpus Linguistics in theJohn scientific Benjamins or Publishingmethodological Company panorama? Imusttakethesequestionstogether, becauseansweringeitheroneinvolvesdis- cussingtheother. Thefirstthingthatneedstobesaidabouttheseandtherestofthisseriesof questions(IshallbesurprisedifIamtheonlycontributorwhomakesessentially thesamepoint)isthatitismisleadingtothinkof“CorpusLinguistics”asabranch oflinguistics,alongsidesociolinguisticsorhistoricallinguistics.Corpuslinguists arejustpeoplewhostudylanguageandlanguagesinanempirical,scientificman- -
(University College London) the Subjunctive Conundrum Plenary II, Thursday, 9:00 – 10:00, Room 1010
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository ABSTRACTS OF TALKS AND WORKSHOP PAPERS Bas Aarts (University College London) The subjunctive conundrum Plenary II, Thursday, 9:00 – 10:00, Room 1010 The view espoused in Palmer (1987: 46) that “the notion of a subjunctive mood is a simple transfer from Latin and has no place in English grammar” is generally accepted in most modern descriptive frameworks. But the consequences of accepting such a view have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. In this paper I will discuss a number of approaches to the English subjunctive, and I will argue that none of them deals adequately with the fallout of denying the existence of an inflectional subjunctive in English. I will propose that English subjunctive clauses can be described by making reference to the notion of Subsective Gradience (Aarts 2007), and that the grammar of English should recognise a ‘subjunctive clause type’, along with declaratives, interrogatives, imperatives and exclamatives. Palmer, Frank (1987) The English verb. London: Longman. Elsbieta Adamczyk (University of Poznan) On morphological restructuring in the early English nominal system: the fate of Old English consonantal inflection Wednesday, 12:00 – 12:30, Room 1016 The paper investigates the morphological shape of the early English nominal inflection, focusing on the developments which contributed to its later restructuring. A prominent feature of the early English inflection was an evident tendency, revealed by nouns considered minor (unproductive) to adopt the inflectional endings of the productive types. This marked inclination of some nouns can be particularly well seen in consonantal stems, such as r-stems (deriving from PIE *-es/-os stems). -
Budget Process Review Project
YORK UNIVERSITY BUDGET PROCESS REVIEW PROJECT FINAL REPORT Prepared by Office of the Vice-President Finance and Administration March 2007 York University Budget Process Review Final Report March 2007 York University Budget Process Review Project Report Table of Contents 1.0 Foreword.…………………………………………………………………………………... 3 2.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….. 4 3.0 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………7 4.0 Overview…………………………………………………………………………………… 9 4.1 Context…………..………………………………………………………………………. 9 4.1.1 Higher Education Context………………………………………………………….. 9 4.1.2 York Context………………………………………………………………………..10 4.2 Initiating the Budget Process Review Project………………………………………….. 12 4.3 Budget Review Team………………………………………………………………….. .13 4.4 Principles………………………………………..…………………………………… …13 4.5 Objectives of the Review……………………………………………………………….. 14 4.6 Structure of Review…………………………………………………………………….. 15 5.0 Key Findings - Phase One: Self-Study …………………………………………………..19 5.1 Part A: Internal Consultations……………………………………………..……………. 19 5.2 Part B: Internal Data Analysis ……………………..…………………………………… 22 6.0 Key Findings - Phase Two: External Information Gathering and Analysis ………….32 6.1 External Institutions ……………………………………………………………………. 32 6.2 Literature Research ……………..………………………………………………………. 34 7.0 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………….. 39 8.0 Recommendations: Phase Three………………………………………………………....42 9.0 Implementation: Phase Four …………………………………………………………….45 10.0 Appendices……………………………………………………………………………….. 47 Appendix A: Provincial Operating Grant per -
A Long-Lasting Antitumor Vaccine Into Converting a B Cell Lymphoma
4-1BBL Cooperates with B7-1 and B7-2 in Converting a B Cell Lymphoma Cell Line into a Long-Lasting Antitumor Vaccine1 Barbara-ann Guinn,* Mark A. DeBenedette,* Tania H. Watts,* and Neil L. Berinstein2*†‡§¶ A20 is a B cell lymphoma that constitutively expresses the costimulatory molecule B7-2 yet grows readily as a tumor in syngeneic BALB/c mice. We have compared the tumorigenicity of A20 variants expressing either B7-1 (A20/B7-1) or B7-2 (A20/B7-2) with an A20 variant expressing B7-1 and B7-2 with 4-1BBL (A20/4-1BBL), a costimulatory member of the TNF family. Mice injected with tumors expressing the vector backbone (A20/CMV) or B7-1 developed tumors within 25 days of s.c. injection. In contrast, mice injected with A20/4-1BBL were tumor free for the 150-day follow-up period, while 25% of mice injected with A20/B7-2 developed tumors. Tumorigenicity experiments using nude mice indicated the requirement for T cells for variant rejection. Almost all mice that resisted the initial tumor challenge were resistant to further challenge with the parental tumor. Splenocytes from these mice showed high CTL lytic activity against the parental tumor, A20, as well as the syngeneic BALB/c lymphoma K46J, but showed background levels of lytic activity against the congenic SCID thymoma line ST-D2 or the allogeneic EL4 thymoma. In vitro blocking experiments with anti-B7-1 plus anti-B7-2 and/or soluble 4-1BB receptor showed B7-1, B7-2, and 4-1BBL all contributed to the CTL activity. -
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Call for Papers
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Call for Papers The seventh international Corpus Linguistics conference (CL2013) will be held at Lancaster University from Tuesday 23rd July 2013 to Friday 26th July 2013. The main conference will be preceded by a workshop day on Monday 22nd July. The goals of the conference are as follows. • To gather together current and developing research in the study and application of corpus linguistics; • To push the field forwards by promoting dialogue among the many different users of corpora across interconnected sub-disciplines of linguistics – be they descriptive, theoretical, applied or computational; • To explore new challenges both within corpus linguistics, and in the extension of corpus approaches to new fields of study. With these goals in mind, we invite contributions on as broad and inclusive a basis as possible. The areas in which we particularly welcome submissions include but are not limited to: • Critical explorations of existing measures and methods in corpus linguistics; • New methods and techniques in corpus development, annotation and analysis; • Corpus approaches to the study of new media; • New tools and techniques developed in corpus-based computational linguistics; • The application of corpus approaches in the social sciences and humanities; • The extension of corpus linguistics to an ever-wider range of (non-English) languages; • The interface between corpus and theory; • The use of corpora in discourse analysis; • The use of corpora in second language acquisition studies and language pedagogy. The following speakers have accepted our invitation to give plenary lectures at CL2013: • Karin Aijmer • Guy Cook • Michael Hoey • Ute Römer With this announcement, we issue our main Call for Papers, and provide notice of workshops being held on Monday 22nd July. -
Grammatological Studies Writing and Its Relation to Speech
RUUL Reports from Uppsala University Linguistics #29 — 1996 (digital format 2019 with minor corrections) John Sören Pettersson Grammatological Studies Writing and its Relation to Speech Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics at Uppsala University 1996 ABSTRACT Petterson, J. S. I 996. Grammatological Studies: Writing and its Relation to Speech. Reports from Uppsala University, Department of Linguistics RUUL #29. 228 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-506-1170-4. This work addresses the problem of how writing is related to speech and how our notions of language are related to writing principles such as ‘the alphabetic principle’. The target of the study is the concept of ‘phonography’ (sound-writing, sometimes called ‘glottography’). This has been used in several theoretical works on writing, often with the assumption that the existence of phonographic systems somehow proves that the purpose of writing is to represent speech. From a functional approach, that is, from a theoretical base where language (of whatever modality) is seen as crucially dependent on actual communicative events, the notion that writing is representational in nature is criticised. Three areas are investigated: 1. the origin of the phono+graphic type of writing (also treated are the origin of spoken language and the medium-dependency of language); 2. the relation between alphabetic writing and notions concerning the structure of language in general and of particular languages; 3. the relationship between phonographic methods of reading old scripts and the prevailing phonocentrism. In all three areas it is found that the possibility of indicating pronunciation of written texts by phonographic means has been overinterpretated in favour of the prevalent representational view. -
A Canada-UK Workshop: “Beating the Bugs”
A Canada-UK Workshop: “Beating the Bugs” Written by: Judith Bray, PhD, Assistant Director, III Creative Design by: David Hartell, Associate, Institute Strategic Initiative, III and Diane Christin, Project Officer, III Canadian Institutes of Health Research 160 Elgin Street, Room 97 Address Locator 4809A Ottawa, ON K1A 0W9 CIHR Institute of Infection and Immunity Suite 214, Siebens-Drake Research Institute 1400 Western Road London, ON N6G 2V4 Phone: 519-661-3228 Fax: 519-661-4226 [email protected] www.cihr.gc.ca/iii.html © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (2008) Cat. No.: MR21-92/2008E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-662-48492-9 A Canada-UK Workshop: “Beating the Bugs” Table of Contents Executive Summary. i Introduction. 1 Background. 2 Goals and Objectives of the Workshop. 2 Day 1 . 3 Keynote Speakers. 3 Breakout Session 1. 11 Day 2 . 13 Presentations. 13 Breakout Session 2. 15 Summary and Path Forward . 19 Workshop Evaluation . 19 Appendix 1 Participant List. 20 Appendix 2 Agenda. 30 A Canada-UK Workshop: “Beating the Bugs” EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Antibiotic resistance is a key factor in the hospital and community acquired multi-drug resistant infections that are posing an increasing threat to global health. The complacency of the last fifty years is rapidly being replaced by mounting concern that we may soon have no defences against the common pathogens previously controlled by antibiotics. Both the UK and Canada are battling similar problems with resistant organisms and both countries are investing in research to address the issue. In an attempt to fast track the outcomes of this research, an invitational workshop was hosted by the Canadian High Commission to bring together the leading researchers from both countries to explore opportunities for partnerships that would capitalize on complementary areas of expertise to advance the research at an accelerated pace. -
(I) Corpora the Non-Book
BOOKS IN THE LLS FACULTY LIBRARY ON HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (9) CORPORA AND CORPORA STUDIES (i) Corpora The non-book Corpora are available in the Ufficio Informatico, Centro Linguistico, Via Salvecchio; contact: Dott.ssa Monica Piantoni ([email protected]; tel: 035/277 216) British National Corpus (BNC): 100M words (BrE; wtn, spkn; 1960- ); available on line. (see Handbook/Guide: INGL.3.4411) Brown Corpus: 1M words (AmE; wtn, 1961); floppy disk. (See also Kjellmer 1994, CONS.INGL.149, which lists collocations in the Brown Corpus.) Changing Times [text archive]: *** words (BrE; wtn; 1785-1985); CD-ROM (can be used for linguistic analysis, but not principally designed for this). Collins CoBUILD English Collocations [dictionary with illustrative quotations]: 2.6M words in the quotations (BrE; wtn, spkn; recent); CD-ROM Collins CoBUILD on CD-ROM [dictionary with illustrative quotations]: 5M words in the quotations (BrE; wtn, spkn; recent); CD-ROM Corpus of Late Modern English Prose (Univ. Manchester): 0,1M words (BrE; wtn; 1860-1919); floppy disk. Helsinki Corpus - Diachronic Part: 1.6M words (BrE; wtn; 850-1710); floppy disks; installed in CL. Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots: 0.8M words (ScE; wtn; 1450-1700); floppy disks. Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English: 1M words (IndE; wtn; 1978); floppy disks. Lancaster-BM Spoken English Corpus. Knowles, Gerry, Briony Williams & L. Taylor (eds.) (1996). A corpus of formal British English speech: the Lancaster-BM spoken English corpus. London/NY: Longman. INGL.3.4066 Lancaster-Oslo / Bergen Corpus (LOB C): 1M words (BrE; wtn; 1961); floppy disks (see guide: Johansson, Stig (1986),IST.INGL.1166) London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: 0.4M words (BrE; spkn; 1961); floppy disks.