Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AONB Office, Shears Building, Stone Lane Industrial Estate, Wimborne, BH21 1HD Tel: 01 725 517417 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.ccwwdaonb.org.uk Kenny Green Development Services Central Wiltshire Council Bythesea Road Trowbridge BA14 8JN By Email: [email protected] 17 June 2015 Dear Kenny 14/06562/FUL Amended Plans; development of 203 residential dwellings, open space, landscaping, sustainable urban drainage, vehicular and pedestrian accesses, and associated infrastructure and engineering works Land to west of St Andrews Road, Warminster, BA12 8ES Thank you for consulting the AONB on this amended application. In relation to the matters raised in my letter if 1 September 2014 there seem to have been few changes of relevance in the amended scheme even though the documentation lists the matters raised by you and the plans show a modified layout. For ease of reference I attach a copy of that letter, and I can confirm that neither the applicants nor their agents have consulted the AONB about resolving or overcoming the matters raised in that letter. I can also confirm that the AONB has not been involved in any consultations / discussions relating to the master plan for the Core Policy 31 strategic allocation extending to include the current site or other sites on the south side of Victoria Road. 1. The Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs AONB has been established under the 1949 National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act to conserve and enhance the outstanding natural beauty of this area which straddles three County, one Unitary and five District councils. It is clear from the Act, subsequent government sponsored reports, and the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 that natural beauty includes wildlife, scientific, and cultural heritage. It is also recognised that in relation to their landscape characteristics and quality, National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty are equally important aspects of the nation’s heritage assets and environmental capital. The AONB Management Plan is a statutory document that is approved by the Secretary of State and is adopted by the constituent councils. It sets out the Local Authorities’ Objectives and Policies for this nationally important area. The national Planning Practice Guidance [Natural Environment paragraph 004] confirms that the AONB and its Management Plan are material considerations in planning. 1 2. The National Planning Policy Framework states (paragraph 109) that the planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by protecting and enhancing valued landscapes which include AONBs. Furthermore it should be recognised that the ‘presumption in favour of sustainable development’ does not automatically apply within AONBs, as confirmed by paragraph 14 footnote 9, due to other policies relating to AONBs elsewhere within the Framework. It also states (paragraph 115) that great weight should be given to conserving landscape and scenic beauty in AONBs, which have the highest status of protection in relation to landscape and scenic beauty. The conservation of wildlife and cultural heritage are important considerations in these areas. 3. This site is close to the AONB boundary. It is also in the view from the elevated Open Access Land of Cley Hill within this AONB, and Cley Hill is a key feature in the view from the site. It is, therefore, in the setting of this AONB. It is also relevant to recall, at this stage, that views to and from AONBs and the impacts of potential developments in the settings of AONBs on such views and the perception of AONB attributes, have been important matters in leading Planning Inspectors to dismiss appeals. Additional Policy Issues 4. The site is part of a larger strategic development area described in detail on pages 256 -259 of the adopted Wiltshire Core Strategy. Within the Key Objectives of that allocation are • the delivery of high quality housing, • protection of the setting of and views to this Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and • ensuring the environment within and around the strategic site is conserved and enhanced. 5. The adopted Core Strategy is quite clear that the quantum of development for the West of Warminster allocation remains at 900 dwellings and that a masterplanning process will have to consider all aspects of the development template, including land for mitigation. It is explicit [page 256] that the strategic allocation ‘does not provide for additional development’. 6. Core Policy 51 refers to development within the setting of an AONB as well as within an AONB. This is explained at some length in the supporting text to the Core Policy. 7. The current application appears to be avoiding that masterplanning process for the whole of the strategic allocation even though it would have been possible to join with those involved [Hearn / Persimmon] with the larger part of the area. The application therefore appears to be in conflict with the adopted Core Strategy. 8. Furthermore, NPPF paragraph 52 indicates that significant extensions to existing developed areas should follow the principles of Garden Cities. As this AONB has previously advocated, that approach would be more suitable for a rural market town such as Warminster than the dense scheme submitted. 2 9. On page 258 of the Cores Strategy details of landscape matters to be addressed within master plans and detailed schemes are set out. Emphasis is given to the AONB, maintaining open views, and ensuring the built form does not assume an unacceptable visual prominence. The importance of conserving and enhancing the field pattern and hedges is emphasised, along with a substantial landscape buffer to screen the urban edges. The setting of Cley Hill is specifically identified. 10. Page 259 indicates there should be a master plan for the strategic allocation which, by implication, means that individual elements of the area [such as the current application] should not come forward in a piecemeal way. 11. There is obviously an expectation by bodies such as the AONB Partnership and Natural England that the robust landscape treatments and development limits set out in the Core Strategy are adhered to. 12. This current amended application appears to increase dramatically the scale of housing development n the strategic allocation at the expense of the landscape and create very high density development more akin to an inner city situation than a rural market town. There is minimal landscape integration despite the close proximity to the AONB. The Amended Application 13. Redrow have submitted an application for 203 houses on the relatively small south-easterly corner of the strategic allocation. The proposed number of dwellings [203] at 28 per acre appears to be a ‘cramming’ exercise. Even considering 50% of that number takes the aggregate development for the strategic allocation well over the Core Strategy number. In addition one has to take account of the potential Bugley Barton Farm development, and including that in the process pushes the overall development way past the Core Strategy numbers. 14. It is, I suggest, worth recalling the scale and extent of the development template in the Core Strategy and the Key Objective to deliver high quality housing. I would also suggest that objective relates to the character and quality of living rather than simply quality of construction. The objectives to provide a. strong buffer to A36, having regard to Cley Hill and this Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty apply to this site. 15. Whilst the Addendum to the EIA seeks to correct weaknesses and errors identified in consultee responses to the original planning application, it does not inspire confidence about its attention to detail, and hence the validity of the assessments, with its variety of typographic errors [Cranbrook Chase; Cranbone Chase], the cut and paste errors regarding CS 51 on page 59, its location of Norridge Wood as south west of the site when it is to the north [para 8.23], and significantly inaccurate measurements [eg para 8.26 site to Cley Hill]. 16. The documentation still appears to fail to consider, other than as passing or dismissive comments, the appearance of the development in views to and from a key feature of this AONB, Cley Hill. Cley Hill is referred to in its context as an SSSI but not as a significant Open Access area within the AONB, and within National Trust ownership. Comments seem to be based on the current view of the site rather than, as should be the case, the visibility of the site 3 when developed. In that context, the blocks of 2.5 storey buildings appear to be in sensitive locations. 17. The landscape section of the Non-Technical Summary of the EIA is very strange. To suggest that existing landscape features and character ‘would be retained’ [para 8.3] seems very misleading as an open grass field would be completely changed to houses and roads. Furthermore, with other development nearby as part of the strategic allocation the cumulative impacts are unlikely to be negligible [para 8.8]. The EIA seems to avoid acknowledging that the development would create change, and hence it has difficulty assessing the landscape and visual changes and their potential adequacy and acceptability. 18. It is, nevertheless, very noticeable that considerable emphasis is put on retaining and managing the hedges and hedgerow trees in the boundaries on the western side of the site with the Rugby Club. This is laudable, as it implicitly acknowledges the importance of sustaining the character and health of these features to limit the visibility of the proposed development from key locations in the AONB, such as Cley Hill. However, all the plans that have been provided clearly show that the hedges and associated trees in the boundaries on the western sides are outside the ‘red line’ of the application area.
Recommended publications
  • June to August 2021
    PROGRAMME : JUNE, JULY & AUGUST 2021 WEB SITE: www.verwoodramblers.org.uk GENTLE EXERCISE FRESH AIR GOOD COMPANY Our club, formed in 1972, offers three walks of 3-4 miles, 5-6 miles, and 9-10 miles, each week, enjoying the stunning downland of Cranborne Chase, woodland and heath in the New Forest, and coastal paths of the Purbecks and World Heritage Jurassic Coast. “TRY BEFORE YOU BUY” - WHY NOT JOIN US FOR A TASTER CALL 01202 826403 NB 1: Walks will be subject to current Covid secure rambling guidelines, see separate file. NB 2: CANCELLED WALKS: If you have any doubts, for whatever reason, that a walk will go ahead as published, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM BY CONTACTING THE LEADER before going to the starting point. NB 3: DOGS: Members are not encouraged to bring dogs, as some members may feel discomfort. Walks invariably pass through areas containing livestock. If brought they should be on a lead at all times and under control. Damage by dogs is not covered by the Club’s insurance policy and would be the owner’s responsibility. All mileages are approximate. JUNE 1 Tues CAR PARK on B3082 Near Badbury Rings 10:00 Exp 118 GR ST966 023 N.B. this is the small free CP opposite the left turn to White Mill, Sturminster Marshall 3.6 mls Gently undulating figure of 8 walk to the Rings 1 steady incline, 1 short hill, no stiles, mud possible. 2 Wed GARSTON/PRIBDEAN WOOD CP 10:00 Exp 118 GR SU 003 195 5 mls Deanland, Barber’s and Great Shaftesbury Coppice, Shermel Gate.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down
    A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down TR010025 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Volume 1 6 Appendix 7.5 Local Landscape Character Areas (LLCA) and Local Townscape Character Areas (LTCA) APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 October 2018 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Environmental Statement 7.5 Local Landscape Character Areas (LLCA) and Local Townscape Character Areas (LTCA) LLCA 01: NORTH BERWICK DOWN Key Characteristics a) Large scale landscape with strong sense of openness and exposure; b) Rolling landscape of predominantly grazed chalk grassland including Parsonage Down National Nature Reserve (NNR), with some arable cultivation; c) Limited areas of woodland but some cover from trees and small copses which tend to be in linear belts with low patchy scrub alongside roads as well as current and remnant field boundaries; d) Limited settlement; e) Recreational routes SLAN 1 and BSJA4 and open access land; f) Archaeological earthworks a notable feature, prominently at Yarnbury Castle; and g) Visual and audible disturbance caused by traffic along the A303 in the far south of the LCA. Landscape Value 7.5.1 The LLCA is of a good condition and scenic quality with substantial open access land and includes rare characteristics such as grazed chalk grassland. It is covered by a local Special Landscape Area designation as well as a nationally important biodiversity designation, and has numerous heritage features including Yarnbury Castle. It is representative of key characteristics within National Character Area (NCA) 132 Salisbury Plain and West Wiltshire Downs. It is considered to be of regional geographic value.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    Topic SALISBURY DISTRICT LDF Creating Sustainable Paper 5 Communities Biodiversity June 2007 Wiltshire Council South Wiltshire Core Strategy Topic Paper 5: Biodiversity and the Natural Environment Please note: This topic paper has been updated since originally written to represent the most up to date information at the time of the proposed submission draft. 1 Executive summary The quality and beauty of the South West region’s environment is remarkably high and this district is no exception. The majority is countryside, and there are many features of regional, national and international importance. These include over 60 SSSIs; the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs AONB, the River Avon SAC (Special Area of Conservation), and the New Foresti. Other features important to the environment include 68 Conservation Areas, 17 historic parks and gardens, and the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge. The extent to which human activity can negatively impact upon the environment is well understood, and the protection and enhancement of the natural world are rightfully key principles of national planning policy. As noted within the county’s BAP (Biodiversity Action Planii), we know that in common with the UK as a whole, within Wiltshire there have been major reductions to the quantity and quality of many habitats, resulting in threats to various species, for instance farmland birds and woodland butterflies. The condition of many of south Wiltshire’s SSSIs is unfavourable, particularly in grassland habitat types (more detailed figures are given below). In the past, pressures from economic growth, demographic change and housing development tended to impact negatively upon the natural environment: the Wiltshire Biodiversity Action Plan notes development of the built environment as one of the major factors impacting upon biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillforts: Britain, Ireland and the Nearer Continent
    Hillforts: Britain, Ireland and the Nearer Continent Papers from the Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland Conference, June 2017 edited by Gary Lock and Ian Ralston Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-226-6 ISBN 978-1-78969-227-3 (e-Pdf) © Authors and Archaeopress 2019 Cover images: A selection of British and Irish hillforts. Four-digit numbers refer to their online Atlas designations (Lock and Ralston 2017), where further information is available. Front, from top: White Caterthun, Angus [SC 3087]; Titterstone Clee, Shropshire [EN 0091]; Garn Fawr, Pembrokeshire [WA 1988]; Brusselstown Ring, Co Wicklow [IR 0718]; Back, from top: Dun Nosebridge, Islay, Argyll [SC 2153]; Badbury Rings, Dorset [EN 3580]; Caer Drewyn Denbighshire [WA 1179]; Caherconree, Co Kerry [IR 0664]. Bottom front and back: Cronk Sumark [IOM 3220]. Credits: 1179 courtesy Ian Brown; 0664 courtesy James O’Driscoll; remainder Ian Ralston. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Severn, Gloucester This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ii
    [Show full text]
  • Core Policy 51: Landscape
    Biodiversity enhancement All development should seek opportunities to enhance biodiversity. Major development in particular must include measures to deliver biodiversity gains through opportunities to restore, enhance and create valuable habitats, ecological networks and ecosystem services. Such enhancement measures will contribute to the objectives and targets of the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) or River Basin/ Catchment Management Plan, particularly through landscape scale projects, and be relevant to the local landscape character. Local sites Sustainable development will avoid direct and indirect impacts upon local sites through sensitive site location and layout, and by maintaining suffi cient buffers and ecological connectivity with the wider environment. Damage or disturbance to local sites will generally be unacceptable, other than in exceptional circumstances where it has been demonstrated that such impacts: i. cannot reasonably be avoided ii. are reduced as far as possible iii. are outweighed by other planning considerations in the public interest iv. where appropriate compensation measures can be secured through planning obligations or agreements. Development proposals affecting local sites must make a reasonable contribution to their favourable management in the long-term. Core Policy 51: Landscape 6.79 The European Landscape Convention promotes landscape protection, management and planning, and applies to all landscapes, towns and villages, as well as open countryside; the coast and inland areas; and ordinary or even degraded landscapes, as well as those that are afforded protection. Development on the edges of towns and villages will be broadly controlled in line with Core Policy 3 (Delivery Strategy). However the principal pressure on the landscape arising from new development is erosion of the separate identity, character, visual and functional amenity of settlements and their setting, and impacts on the open countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Pewsey Or Marlborough Circular (Via Avebury)
    Pewsey Circular (via Avebury World Heritage Site) Marlborough Circular (via Avebury World Heritage Site) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 26th Sept. 2015 08th August 2020 04th Nov. 2017 Current status Document last updated Monday, 19th July 2021 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2015-2021, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Pewsey or Marlborough Circular (via Avebury) Start and Finish: Pewsey Station or Marlborough High Street (Lloyds Bank) Bus Stop Pewsey Station, map reference SU 161 603, is 25 km south of Swindon, 116 km west of London, and 116m above sea level. Marlborough, map reference SU 187 691, is 9 km north east of Pewsey and 132m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Wiltshire SSSI name European Licence condition Designated Site name (where applicable) Acres Farm All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Meadow traps to existing sett footprint. Delay access until after hay cut, mid- July. Baverstock All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Juniper Bank traps to existing sett footprint. SSSI Bencroft Hill All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Meadows traps to existing sett footprint. Delay access until after hay cut, mid- July. Bentley Wood All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Any decaying wood located within the sett footprint is to be left in situ if possible. If decaying wood must be moved then it should be moved no further than is necessary. Bincknoll Dip All vehicles must be restricted to existing surfaced tracks. Limit Woods location of traps to existing sett footprint within the woodland areas of the SSSI only and ideally in the conifer area. Traps should only be dug in, on boundary edges in these areas, such as hedgerows. Blackmoor All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Copse SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Botley Down All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Bowerchalke No activities from 1st March to 31st August to avoid bird breeding Downs season.
    [Show full text]
  • Chestnut Cottage Church Street, Bowerchalke, Salisbury, Wiltshire Chestnut Cottage Church Street, Bowerchalke, Salisbury, Wiltshire, Sp5 5Be
    CHESTNUT COTTAGE CHURCH STREET, BOWERCHALKE, SALISBURY, WILTSHIRE CHESTNUT COTTAGE CHURCH STREET, BOWERCHALKE, SALISBURY, WILTSHIRE, SP5 5BE A VILLAGE HOUSE IN A CENTRAL SETTING WITH FLEXIBLE ACCOMMODATION, IDEAL FOR A FAMILY. IN THIS PICTURESQUE VILLAGE TO THE HEART OF THE CHALKE VALLEY AREA OF OUT- STANDING NATURAL BEAUTY. Chestnut Cottage is a village house in a central setting with flexible accommodation, ideal for a family. In this picturesque village to the heart of the Chalke Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The living space is arranged either side of a kitchen/ breakfast room, with an openness between the principal reception rooms, which works well for entertaining and family life alike. A third reception room can be accessed separately or through the utility room and boot room. This space is perfect as a family room, playroom or for teenagers. Equally, it could be arranged as a home studio or a home office. The first floor rooms also offer flexibility, with a smaller fifth bedroom or dressing room. The gardens are to the rear, with driveway parking and a garage to the front. The garden slopes upwards, framed by two horse chestnut trees and further apple trees higher up. There is a terrace next to the house and at the top of the garden is a summer house, which catches the afternoon sun. SALISBURY OFFICE 01722 443 000 | [email protected] COUNTRY HOUSE DEPARTMENT 020 7871 0589 | [email protected] LOCATION SERVICES Bowerchalke is an attractive village, some The vendor informs us the property is served eleven miles or so southwest of Salisbury.
    [Show full text]
  • SSSI) Notified Under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981, As Amended
    COUNTY: HAMPSHIRE/DORSET/WILTSHIRE SITE NAME: RIVER AVON SYSTEM Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981, as amended. Environment Agency Region: South Wessex Water Company: Wessex Water PLC, Bournemouth and West Hampshire Water Company Local Planning Authorities: Hampshire County Council, Dorset County Council, Wiltshire County Council, East Dorset District Council, New Forest District Council, Christchurch Borough Council, Salisbury District Council, Kennet District Council, West Wilts District Council National Grid Reference: SZ 163923 (Christchurch Harbour) to: SU 073583 (Avon) ST 867413 (Wylye) ST 963297 (Nadder), SU 170344 (Bourne) SZ 241147 (Dockens Water) Extent of River SSSI: Approx 205.11 km, 507.79 (ha.) Ordnance Survey Sheet: (1:50 000) 173 183 184 195 Date notified (under 1981 Act): 16 December 1996 Other Information: A new river SSSI. This site is listed as Grade 1* quality in ‘A Nature Conservation Review’ edited by D A Ratcliffe, C.U.P., 1977. Parts of the site are separately notified as: Lower Woodford Water Meadows SSSI (1987); East Harnham Meadows (1995); Britford Water Meadows (1987); Avon Valley (Bickton- Christchurch) SSSI (1993). The site is significant for the following habitat and species covered by Council Directive 92/43/EEC on The Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna: Habitat Floating vegetation of Ranunculus of plain and submountainous rivers Species Sea Lamprey Petromyzon marinus Annex IIa Brook lamprey Lampetra planeri Annex IIa Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Annex IIa, Va Bullhead Cotto gobius Annex IIa Desmoulin’s Whorl Snail Vertigo moulinsiana Annex IIa Parts of the site lie in the Avon Valley Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) and/or the West Wiltshire Downs and Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Research Agenda for the Avebury World Heritage Site
    This volume draws together contributions from a number of specialists to provide an agenda for future research within the Avebury World Heritage Site. It has been produced in response to the English Heritage initiative for the development of regional and period research frameworks in England and represents the first formal such agenda for a World Heritage Site. Following an introduction setting out the background to, need for and development of the Research Agenda, the volume is presented under a series of major headings. Part 2 is a resource assessment arranged by period from the Lower Palaeolithic to the end of the medieval period (c. AD 1500) together with an assessment of the palaeo-environmental data from the area. Part 3 is the Research Agenda itself, again arranged by period but focusing on a variety of common themes. A series of more over-arching, landscape-based themes for environmental research is also included. In Part 4 strategies for the implementation of the Research Agenda are explored and in Part 5 methods relevant for that implementation are presented. Archaeological Research Agenda for the Avebury World Heritage Site Avebury Archaeological & Historical Research Group (AAHRG) February 2001 Published 2001 by the Trust for Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury SP4 6EB Wessex Archaeology is a Registered Charity No. 287786 on behalf of English Heritage and the Avebury Archaeological & Historical Research Group Copyright © The individual authors and English Heritage all rights reserved British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 1–874350–36–1 Produced by Wessex Archaeology Printed by Cromwell Press Ltd, Trowbridge The cost of this publication was met by English Heritage Front Cover: Avebury: stones at sunrise (© English Heritage Photographic Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Ansty and Its Setting
    Ansty is located in the south west part of the county of Wiltshire some 2 The linear shape of Ansty has been clearly influenced by the valley it is miles south of the larger village of Tisbury; 7 miles north east of in: with buildings exploiting the narrow flat areas either side of the Shaftesbury (Dorset) and 15 miles south west of the city of Salisbury. watercourse. The original Saxon heart of Ansty can still be surmised around the vicinity of the church, the Commandery, the manor and the The origins of Ansty go back to Saxon times and those Saxon invaders maypole triangle. An early track through the village closely followed the knew the sort of site and location they were looking for! Unlike the watercourse line. Later the track level was raised above the small flood ‘modern’ Romans before them, with their well-built fortifications, plain to avoid the frequent flooding that must have occurred! straight roads, planned towns and country villas, Saxon tribes preferred to travel along river valleys and clear wooded areas to create small The valley offers shelter from the prevailing winds which blow quite settlements based on communal agriculture and self-sufficiency. Most fiercely over the flat tops of the greensand plateaus. The steep slopes of of our local villages can put in a claim to possessing a Saxon heritage. the valley sides are wooded; the lower slopes down to the watercourses are dotted with ponds and small wet meadows - some of which have Our village is a typical spring line settlement: indeed there are a number been allowed to become bog meadows under various stewardship of springs in Ansty! The main water source rises to the south of the schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Type 2:Wooded Downland 2: Wooded Downland
    LANDSCAPE TYPE 2:WOODED DOWNLAND 2: WOODED DOWNLAND 12A 11B 8A 8A 11A 9A 16A 9A 4A 12B 1B 9A 10A 5A 7C 1A 2A 10B 15A 11C 2B 3B 6A 3A 7A 5D 5E 2E 6B 5C 68 2E 3C 8523 D L 7A A o 7B N nce ce 7B i 14A UC L L , 13A ht g 2F i r y p 5F Co 6C n w 7B 5B 2C o Cr , ce i 2D f f O y r ne o i 14B t a t S s ' y t s e j a M r e H f o r e l l o r nt Co e LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS h T f o n o i s s 2A Savernake Plateau i m r pe e h 2B Chute Forest t h t i w n o i 2C Witherington Wood Downland t a m r o f n i 2D Cranborne Chase Wooded Downland y e v r u S ce 2E West Wiltshire Downs Wooded Downland n a n d r O m 2F Fovant Down Wooded Downland o r f d e uc d Urban Area o pr e R TYPE 2: WOODED DOWNLAND DESCRIPTION Location and boundaries The Wooded Downland Landscape Type encompasses the Chalk uplands at the south and mid-east of the county where deposits of Clay-with-Flint overlie the Chalk. There are five character areas in the type: 2A: Savernake Plateau sited on the eastern boundary in the middle of the county; 2B: Chute Forest to the south of area 2A; 2C: Witherington Wooded Downland at the south east of the county and 2D: Cranborne Chase Wooded Downland, 2E: West Wiltshire Downs Wooded Downland and 2F: Fovant Down Wooded Downland fanning out from the south of the county northwards separated by river valleys.
    [Show full text]