DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Year 2005 Department of the Army Financial Statements and Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Year 2005 Department of the Army Financial Statements and Notes Fiscal Year 2005 United States Army Annual Financial Statement Call to Duty – 230 Years of Service to Our Nation http://www.army.mil We are interested in your feedback regarding the content of this report. Please feel free to e-mail your comments to [email protected] or write to: Department of the Army Offi ce of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) Offi ce of the Financial Reporting Directorate Room 3A312, 109 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-0109 Additional copies of this report can be obtained by sending a written request to the e- mail or mailing address listed above. You may also view this document at: http://www.asafm.army.mil/fo/fod/cfo/cfo.asp Fiscal Year 2005 United States Army Annual Financial Statement Call to Duty – 230 Years of Service to Our Nation Table of Contents Message from the Secretary of the Army iii Message from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) v Message from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) vii FY 2005 in Review 1 General Fund – Management’s Discussion & Analysis 8 Working Capital Fund – Management’s Discussion & Analysis 144 Civil Works Fund – Management’s Discussion & Analysis 224 i The Honorable Francis J. Harvey ii Secretary of the Army Message | FY 2005 Army Annual Financial Statement As the President stated on July 07, 2005, the day terrorists struck in London, “the war on terror goes on.” This long war is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Army must be ready and relevant today and tomorrow, always able to accomplish our mission of protecting America and providing the necessary forces and capabilities to the combatant commanders in support of the National Security and Defense Strategies. In parallel with fi ghting the global war on terror, the Army is undertaking its largest transformation since WWII. The transformed force will be more powerful, fl exible, rapidly deployable and it positions the Army to defeat new and emerging threats. Over the past year we continued to build the modular brigade combat teams, which are the centerpiece of the transformed force and to increase the size of the operational Army. Additionally, ongoing unit rebalancing, in conjunction with our new modular forces, will reduce the stress on our force by permitting more predictable rotation cycles with longer periods at home for our Soldiers. The Army is also transforming its “back offi ce” by streamlining its business practices and processes that enable us to more effectively manage people, cost and schedule – components which make up the backbone of business. The Army is beginning a critical review of the institutional Army to determine what resources, material, and property are essential to organizations, missions, and structures. We are adopting proven management analysis tools and procedures to analyze our manufacturing, repair, and administrative processes which will reduce cost while freeing up resources for the operational Army. We also awarded the contract for the General Fund Enterprise Business System, which will produce accurate, reliable, and timely fi nancial information enabling better decisions and support for our Soldiers and their families. To achieve our vision of remaining the preeminent landpower on earth, our Soldiers must remain the best trained, organized, equipped, and sustained in the world. Soldiers, and their civilian colleagues, are performing magnifi cently today in Iraq, Afghanistan, and in over 100 other countries around the globe; they deserve the best support we can provide. Consequently, transformation is ingrained in everything the Army does, operationally and institutionally. Francis J. Harvey Secretary of the Army iii Valerie Lynn Baldwin iv Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) | FY 2005 Army Annual Financial Statement During fi scal year 2005, the Army managed $149 billion of appropriated funds. This included $58.4 billion in Global War On Terrorism supplemental funds. Among numerous accomplishments, we maintained a high operations tempo with 19 active component and 10 reserve component brigade combat teams deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, and throughout the world. We created seven additional modular brigades as part of our Army transformation, and provided support to civil authorities along the Gulf coast for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In addition, we adjusted the fi nancial management strategic planning framework to align with strategic objectives. Under this framework, four fi nancial initiatives were developed to close the gap between Army requirements and funding, improve the quality of fi nancial management information systems, improve accountability and management controls for the Army enterprise, and execute effective fi nancial management. Providing accurate, timely, and relevant fi nancial information to Army leaders requires sophisticated fi nancial and business case analyses. By stressing innovation, creativity, fl exibility, and following the Chief Financial Offi cer Strategic Plan, solid progress is being made to reach this objective. Thank you for your efforts and for serving this great Army. Valerie L. Baldwin Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) v John Paul Woodley, Jr. vi Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) | FY 2005 Army Annual Financial Statement The Army Corps of Engineers traces its origins back to the construction of fortifi cations at Bunker Hill in 1775. Since then, the Corps has responded to the challenges of the nation and the Army. Throughout its history, the Corps has been committed to serving the nation and the Army in peace and war by providing comprehensive engineering, management and technical services. Our responsibilities over time have continually evolved to refl ect America’s priorities. What began as a military engineering mission for nation building in the 18th Century expanded into a major peacetime mission in the 19th Century. The Corps helped a young nation map the frontier and expand westward by surveying roads and canals. The Corps contributed to the nation’s economy by developing an inland navigation system that moved commerce across states and keeping ports and harbors open, a role critical for national defense. In the 20th Century, the Corps’ civil mission expanded again with the adoption of more water resources development and management duties, including fl ood control, hydropower, recreation, water supply, shore protection, and disaster relief. More recently, environmental protection and restoration responsibilities were entrusted to the Corps. As society’s requirements and values have changed, the Civil Works mission has refl ected changing national priorities for public water management. The Corps’ abilities to evaluate, facilitate, advise, develop, operate, and manage provide a robust set of capabilities for the nation’s benefi t in facilitating an integrated approach to water resources management. Responsibilities for the development, management, and protection of water resources constitute the current Army Civil Works mission. One of the great strengths of the Corps is the force multiplier effect between civil and military missions. In addition to the direct contributions that the Civil Works mission makes to our economic and environmental security and prosperity, the Corps also applies its Civil Works assets to support the Army in times of national need to enhance homeland security. In turn, the Civil Works mission derives greater capability and effectiveness by being an integral part of the larger Army and Defense team. Looking to the future, we must seek to do everything within our authorities to ensure that our country’s economy remains strong and its natural resources protected. Our nation’s water resources are fi nite, and in managing those resources we are increasingly challenged to reach decisions that achieve an appropriate balance between the social and economic benefi ts of development with the need to protect the environment. As science and engineering continue to advance, we will seek to leverage these advancements to strike that balance. We are dedicated to continuing a national water resources program that serves the best interest of our citizens. In that regard, I will continue to rely on the Strategic Plan for the Army Civil Works mission that sets forth the framework for enhancing the sustainability of America’s water resources. John Paul Woodley, Jr. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) vii Year in Review When the nation calls, the Army always has and always will answer that call. But we cannot stand still…we need to change. The Honorable Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army viii FY 2005 in Review | FY 2005 Army Annual Financial Statement FY 2005 In Review Overview The operations of the Army tempo remained high in fi scal year (FY) 2005. More than 250,000 Soldiers - a signifi cant proportion of active and reserve component combat forces – are deployed in 120 countries around the world. Most of these Soldiers are in Iraq and Afghanistan, engaged in direct support of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT); but the Army also continues to deter aggression and assist U.S. Allies in As FY 2005 came to a close, the Army had 1,014,910 Korea; Europe, including the Balkans; South America; men and women in uniform with 492,728 in the active Africa; and in numerous other locations. In addition, force, 189,005 in the Army Reserve (USAR) and 333,177 Soldiers perform much essential work throughout the in the Army National Guard (ARNG). In addition, the United States, to include providing homeland defense, Army employed 235,645 civilian personnel. supporting fi refi ghting efforts in national forests, and most recently, supporting the relief effort following Operation Iraqi Freedom and Iraq Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Reconstruction Operation Iraqi Freedom continues to be the most signifi cant mission in terms of troop levels and other resources. The Army force at the end of the fi scal year “We are the best Army in the world consisted of approximately 105,000 active and reserve without a question.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chemical Weapons Conventions at 1
    Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter L-Biographical and Necrological Index Cross Co., Ark
    Letter L-Biographical and Necrological Index Cross Co., Ark. by Paul V.Isbell, Mar.2,2013 Index:Partial Abair, Flossie, 180 Davis, Shelia, Mrs., 66 Armstrong, Mary, Mrs., 142 Dennett, Sarah Ann m.Lackey, Mrs. Barksdale, Steven, 159 d.1902, 14 Batchelor, Nellie Ruth m.Loyd, Mrs., 180 Douglas, Tracie m.Lawrence, Mrs., 47 Betts, John Logan d.1924, 80 Draffen, Temfy b.1863-, 114 Betts, Sarah Lavina Boyd, Mrs. d.1918, 80 Dunlap, Jessie m.Lackey, Mrs. d.1984, 14 Bibens, Kenny, 159 Eskew, Judy Jacqueline m.Lindley, Mrs., Blake, Julia m.Like, Mrs., 112 117 Blaylock, Jeannie, Mrs., 110 Evans, Douglas, 53 Boone, Darlene m.Like, Mrs., 112 Fecho, Lisa m.Lamb, Mrs., 20 Brock, Rena Mae m.Lamb, Mrs., 22 Feyen, Carolyn McAllister, Mrs., 110 Burnett, Peggy, Mrs., 142 Flippo, Margaret m.Leverett, Mrs., 91 Butler, Ann, Mrs., 66 Funston, Bernice m.Lawrence, Mrs., 48 Cantrell, Pam m.Leverette, Mrs., 91 Gaar, Catherine Jane Blandenbaker, Mrs. Casteel, Mamie m.Logan, Mrs. d.1949, 138, d.1872, 138 140 Gaar, Staunton Wilhoite d.1869, 138 Castle, Juanita, Mrs., 143 Gaddis, Bob, 84 Chambers, Monroe, 143 Ginesta, Deborah m.Love, Mrs., 154 Chance, Lodusky Jane m.Lackey, Mrs. Graddy, Thelma Louise m.Larue, Mrs. d.1971, 14 d.1998, 37 Cheney, Emma m.Loveless, Mrs., 159 Green, Maude m.Couch, Mrs., 105 Compton, Myrtle m.Larue, Mrs. d.1985, 37 Harris, Delanie m.Massey, Mrs., 137 Cook, Jo m.Martin, Mrs., 66 Hastings, Anne m.Loveless, Mrs., 159 Cook, Mattie Virgie m.Logan, Mrs. d.1947, Heindselman, Ralph, 111 140 Henderson, Raymond, 111 Couch, Bernice Dunn, Mrs., 105 Henderson, Willie Francis, Mrs., 23 Couch, John H., 105 Hendrix, Sherry Ann m.Lindley, Mrs., 117 Couch, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Department of Environmental Management
    ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RENEWAL OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PERMIT UNDER THE ALABAMA HAZARDOUS WASTES MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION ACT (AHWMMA) AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PUBLIC NOTICE – 421 CALHOUN COUNTY Anniston Army Depot of Anniston, Alabama submitted to ADEM an application for renewal of its Hazardous Waste Facility permit for the 3 ANMC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 3 ANAD Industrial Waste Storage Buildings ,1 Roll-off Storage Building, 1 Open Burning Unit, 1 Open Detonation Unit, 1 Static Detonation Chamber (SDC), 3 SDC Service Magazines, 34 SDC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 1 Thermal Treatment Closed Disposal Process (TTCDP), 1 Energetic Treatment Unit (Flash Furnace), and 3 Rocket Motor Fire Units which are used to manage hazardous waste at its facility (EPA I.D. Number AL3 210 020 027 located at 7 Frankford Avenue, Anniston, Alabama 36201. The Department has determined the facility’s renewal application to be complete and has prepared a draft permit in accordance with State regulations. Anniston Army Depot operates a facility that treats and stores hazardous waste. The United States Department of the Army, Anniston Army Depot (Facility Owner, Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Operator); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Munitions Center (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co- Operator (ANMC operations)); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Field Office (AFO) (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (Static Detonation Chamber (SDC) Site); and Washington Demilitarization Company LLC (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (SDC site)) are the operators of the hazardous waste storage and treatment facility. The proposed permit renewal incorporates updates to the previous permit to reflect changes made to Part I thought IX of the AHWMMA permit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense Transportation and Logistics Community Will Be There
    The Defense Transportation and Logistics Community Will Be There MAXIMIZE YOUR VISIBILITY. NETWORK WITH KEY DECISION MAKERS. ENHANCE YOUR VALUE. Sponsor and Exhibit at the 2017 NDTA Fall Exposition Make plans to join us in St. Louis, Missouri October 10 - 13 for the 2017 NDTA Fall Exposition. This is the only venue focused directly on network- ing with top level government and industry decision makers in transporta- tion, logistics, distribution, passenger services, and related industries. Develop and Strengthen Your Brand Establish industry positioning. Demonstrate your latest equipment, products and services. Gain a Competitive Edge Participation as a sponsor and exhibitor illustrates your company’s prod- ucts and services are aligned with the vision and objectives of NDTA and its members. Interact with Decision Makers and Key Influencers With more than 1,300 projected attendees from the military and govern- ment as well as industry, the NDTA Fall Exposition provides opportunities to develop new business leads while enhancing existing relationships, enabling you to provide the ideas and solutions needed to address ongo- ing challenges to our nation’s defense. Build and strengthen relationships with top and mid-level managers in industry and military and government. Interact with your military and government customers, including the com- manders and leaders of those organizations. Troubleshoot with other key players. The NDTA Fall Exposition provides a cost-effective way to meet face-to- face with the influencers and decision makers who are critical to meeting your goals, while at the same time reinforcing your company image with representatives from a wide array of industries, including: airlines, rail- roads, motor carriers, ocean shippers, transportation consultants, cyber security, security, travel and hospitality, express companies, technology, household goods carriers, labor unions, port authorities, and 3PLs.
    [Show full text]
  • Francisella Tularensis Blue-Grey Phase Variation Involves Structural
    Francisella tularensis blue-grey phase variation involves structural modifications of lipopolysaccharide O-antigen, core and lipid A and affects intramacrophage survival and vaccine efficacy THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Shilpa Soni Graduate Program in Microbiology The Ohio State University 2010 Master's Examination Committee: John Gunn, Ph.D. Advisor Mark Wewers, M.D. Robert Munson, Ph.D. Copyright by Shilpa Soni 2010 Abstract Francisella tularensis is a CDC Category A biological agent and a potential bioterrorist threat. There is no licensed vaccine against tularemia in the United States. A long- standing issue with potential Francisella vaccines is strain phase variation to a grey form that lacks protective capability in animal models. Comparisons of the parental strain (LVS) and a grey variant (LVSG) have identified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alterations as a primary change. The LPS of the F. tularensis variant strain gains reactivity to F. novicida anti-LPS antibodies, suggesting structural alterations to the O-antigen. However, biochemical and structural analysis of the F. tularensis LVSG and LVS LPS demonstrated that LVSG has less O-antigen but no major O-antigen structural alterations. Additionally, LVSG possesses structural differences in both the core and lipid A regions, the latter being decreased galactosamine modification. Recent work has identified two genes important in adding galactosamine (flmF2 and flmK) to the lipid A. Quantitative real-time PCR showed reduced transcripts of both of these genes in the grey variant when compared to LVS. Loss of flmF2 or flmK caused less frequent phase conversion but did not alter intramacrophage survival or colony morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL)
    WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL) Within the Western Regional Partnership (WRP) region, there are significant military testing and training installations and ranges. WRP developed summaries from all of the Services and the National Guard, describing the history, missions, and importance of these assets. These summaries use only publicly available information and are written for the policy maker new to military issues and the military savvy person needing specific military information. It is our hope that WRP Partners use these summaries as a tool for land use planning efforts to encourage compatible growth and ensure future mission viability. Incompatible development (encroachment) comes in many forms but for the military, it means those issues that affect their ability to fulfill their mission on land, in the sea, or in the air. These military summaries are for general planning purposes. Attached Utah MAL summaries: Air Force: • Hill Air Force Base • Utah Test and Training Range Army: • Dugway Proving Ground • Tooele Army Depot National Guard: • Utah Air National Guard • Utah Army National Guard Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force: HILL AFB : UTAH Hill Air Force Base is an Air Force Materiel Command base located in northern Utah. Hill is the Air Force's third largest base by population and size. The base is home to many operational and support missions, with the host organization Above: Hill AFB is the largest single-site employer in Utah. (Associated Press being the 75th Photo) Air Base Wing. Left: Two F-16s taxi on runway at Hill AFB. (U.S. Air Force photo) Hill AFB traces its history to when the Army attempted to establish an airmail station in the area MISSION STATEMENT Provide mission-ready Airmen and in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Chemical and Biological Warfare: an American
    History of Chemical and Biological Warfare: An American Perspective Chapter 2 HISTORY OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE JEFFERY K. SMART, M.A.* INTRODUCTION PRE–WORLD WAR I DEVELOPMENTS WORLD WAR I THE 1920S: THE LEAN YEARS THE 1930S: THE GROWING THREAT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE THE 1940S: WORLD WAR II AND THE NUCLEAR AGE THE 1950S: HEYDAY OF THE CHEMICAL CORPS THE 1960S: DECADE OF TURMOIL THE 1970S: THE NEAR END OF THE CHEMICAL CORPS THE 1980S: THE RETURN OF THE CHEMICAL CORPS THE 1990S: THE THREAT MATERIALIZES SUMMARY *Command Historian, U.S. Army Chemical and Biological Defense Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5423 9 Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare INTRODUCTION Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines or biological warfare went virtually unnoticed by the term “chemical warfare,” first used in 1917, the U.S. Army. By the end of World War I, the situ- as “tactical warfare using incendiary mixtures, ation had drastically changed. Chemical warfare smokes, or irritant, burning, poisonous, or asphyx- had been used against and by American soldiers iating gases.” A working definition of a chem- on the battlefield. Biological warfare had been used ical agent is “a chemical which is intended for covertly on several fronts. In an effort to determine use in military operations to kill, seriously injure, what had gone wrong with their planning and train- or incapacitate man because of its physiological ing, U.S. Army officers prepared a history of chemi- effects. Excluded from consideration are riot con- cal and biological warfare. To their surprise, they trol agents, chemical herbicides and smoke found numerous documented cases of chemical and and flame materials.”1(p1-1) Chemical agents were biological agents having been used or proposed to usually divided into five categories: nerve agents, influence the outcome of a battle or campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod 4000.24-2-S1, Chap2b
    DOD 4LX)0.25-l -S1 RI RI CODE LOCATION AND ACTTVITY DoDAAD CODE COOE LOCATION ANO ACTIVITY DoDAAD COOE WFH 94TH MAINT SUP SPT ACTY GS WE 801S7 SPT BN SARSS-I SARSS-O CO B OSU SS4 BLDG 1019 CRP BUILDING 5207 FF STEWART &! 31314-5185 FORT CAMPBELL KY 42223-5000 WI EXCESS TURN-IN WG2 DOL REPARABLE SARSS 1 SARSS-1 REPARABLE EXCHANGE ACTIVITY B1OG 1086 SUP AND SVC DW DOL BLOC 315 FF STEWART GA 31314-5185 FORT CARSON CO 80913-5702 WFJ 226TH CS CO WG3 MAINTENANCE TROOP SARSS-1 SUPPORT SQUAORON BLDG 1019 3D ARMORED CALVARY REGIMENT FT STEWART GA 31314-5185 FORT BLISS TX 79916-6700 WFK 1015 Cs co MAINF WG4 00L VEHICLE STORAGE SARSS 1 SARSS-I CLASS N Iv Vll BLDG 403 F7 GILLEM MF CRP SUP AND SVC OIV 00L BLDG 315 FOREST PARK GA 30050-5000 FORT CARSON CO 80913-5702 W-L 1014 Cs co WG5 DOL ECHO OSU .SAFfSS 1 SARss-1 EXCESS WAREHOUSE 2190 WINIERVILLE RD MF CRP SUP ANO SVC DIV 00L BLOG 315 ATHENS GA 30605-2139 FORT CARSON CO 80913-5702 WFM 324TH CS BN MAINT TECH SHOP WG6 SUP LNV DOL CONSOL PRDP ACCT SARSS-1 MF CRP SUP AND SVC DIV DOL BLDG 315 BLOC 224 FORT CARSON CO 80913-5702 FT BENNING GA 31905-5182 WG7 HQS ANO HQS CO OISCOM SARSS2A WFN 724TH CS BN CA A DSU CL9 1ST CAV OW OMMC SARSS-I BLDG 32023 BLDG 1019 FORT HOOD TX 76545-5102 FF STEWART GA 31314-5185 WG8 71OTH MSB HSC GS WFP STOCK RECORD ACCT .
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2: 1960 - 2017 Historic Hospital List by COUNTY
    Table 2: 1960 - 2017 Historic Hospital List by COUNTY County Code Hospital Name/Address City Zip ALAMEDA 1 013 ACMC-HIGHLAND CAMPUS 1411 E. 31ST ST OAKLAND 94602 1 001 ALAMEDA HOSPITAL 2070 CLINTON AVE ALAMEDA 94501 1 002 ALTA BATES HOSPITAL AT ALBANY 1247 MARIN AVENUE ALBANY 94706 1 003 ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER 2450 ASHBY AVENUE BERKELEY 94705 1 004 BOOTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2794 GARDEN STREET OAKLAND 94701 1 005 CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL 51ST & GROVE STREETS OAKLAND 94609 1 006 CIVIC CENTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION 390 40TH STREET OAKLAND 94609 1 008 EDEN MEDICAL CENTER 20103 LAKE CHABOT RD CASTRO VALLEY 94546 1 009 ESKATON DOCTORS HOSPITAL OAKLAND 4600 E FAIRFAX AVENUE OAKLAND 94601 1 010 FAIRMONT HOSPITAL 15400 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SAN LEANDRO 94578 1 011 HAYWARD HOSPITAL 770 'A' STREET HAYWARD 94541 1 012 HERRICK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2001 DWIGHT WAY BERKELEY 94704 1 015 KAISER HOSPITAL: OAKLAND 275 W. MACARTHUR BLVD OAKLAND 94611 1 014 KAISER HOSPITAL: SAN LEANDRO 2500 MERCED STREET SAN LEANDRO 94577 1 017 NAVAL HOSPITAL: OAKLAND 8750 MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD OAKLAND 94627 1 018 OAKLAND HOSPITAL CORPORATION 2648 EAST 14TH STREET OAKLAND 94601 1 019 OGORMAN INFANT 2587 - 35TH AVENUE OAKLAND 94601 1 020 PERALTA HOSPITAL 450 - 30TH STREET OAKLAND 94609 1 025 PHYSICIANS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2800 BENEDICT DRIVE SAN LEANDRO 94577 1 007 SAN LEANDRO HOSPITAL 13855 E 14TH STREET SAN LEANDRO 94578 1 023 ST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL 813 J STREET LIVERMORE 94550 1 022 ST. ROSE HOSPITAL 27200 CALAROGA AVE HAYWARD 94540 1 021 SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER 3100 SUMMIT STREET OAKLAND 94623 1 016 SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER - HAWTHORNE 350 HAWTHORNE AVENUE OAKLAND 94609 1 781 THE BIRTH HOME 4441 RAILROAD AVE PLEASANTON 94566 1 024 VALLEYCARE MEDICAL CENTER 5555 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 90-110 an ACT October 21, 1967 to Authorize Certain Construction at Military Installations and for Other Purposes
    81 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 90-1 10-OCT. 21, 1967 279 Public Law 90-110 AN ACT October 21, 1967 To authorize certain construction at military installations and for other purposes. [H.R. 11722] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Represent at wen of the United States of Amerha in Congress assembled. Military con- •' ^ 1 struction Au­ thorization Act, TITLE I 1968. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mill- ^'''"y- tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES . , . UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL ARMY COMMAND r'ii _ (First Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Operational and training facilities, and re­ search, development, and test facilities, $3,210,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Maintenance facilities, and utilities, $1,304,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Hospital facilities, $2,585,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, and utilities, $976,000. Fort Hamilton, New York: Operational facilities, $127,(M)(). A. P. Hill Military Reservation, Virginia: Training facilities, suj)- ply facilities, troop housing, and utilities, $4,893,000. Fort. Holabird, Maryland: Administrative facilities, $588,000. Indiantown Gap Military Reservation, Pennsylvania: Training facilities, $581,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, and utilities, $3,325,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $1,646,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland: Hospital facilities, and adminis­ trative facilities, $4,510,000. Camp Pickett, Virginia: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, and supply facilities, and ground improvements, $329,000. ?f ^' (Third Army) Fort Penning, Georgia: Troop housing and utilities, $3,769,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page for PDF 8.5X11
    Review Comments for the Revised Draft Final SWMU 13 Corrective Measures Study Work Plan and Report Tooele Army Depot – South Area Dated February 2016 Section, No. Page Comment Response Paragraph Name, Organization: Dave Larsen, Utah DSHW, March 8, 2016 Responses to State comments on the CMS Work Plan and Report 1 Notwithstanding the information in Section 3.3.6.1 While the Rust 1997 RFI did not completely define the about sample reanalysis, the information in Section area impacted by several non-fuel spill related VOCs in 3.3.6 about agent breakdown products (ABPs) and the groundwater, sufficient information has been collected to information in Figures L.1 and L.4 showing select a corrective measure for the fuel-impacted area and chloroform and TCE plumes outside the main release the recommended corrective measures will address area, the responses to Division comments five and six remediation of all contaminants within the fuel-impacted indicate additional dissolved groundwater related area. work will not be needed. The Division does not concur with this response and suggests the need for It is acknowledged that non-fuel constituents were additional wells or borings to define the dissolved identified in groundwater during the CMS data gap plumes and contamination in the deeper groundwater investigation outside of the fuel release area. While system. In addition, the presence of contamination in delineating the lateral extent of chloroform and TCE is not the deeper groundwater seems to verify a hydraulic part of a CMS, these constituents will be monitored in connection between the shallow and deep systems.
    [Show full text]