Understanding the Opportunistic Approach To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding the Opportunistic Approach To N#,+5A#WB AO, +ANW5AW +O A #W5W6wAWh Sdwulfn Plqirug dugl Exvlqhvv Vfkrro dqg HSU Qdyhhq Vulqlydvdq_ dugl Exvlqhvv Vfkrro Devwudfw Rqh dssurdfk wr dfklhylqj sulfh vwdelolw| lv wr xqghuwdnh d gholehudwh sdwk wr dq xowlpdwh jrdo ri orz lq dwlrq 0gholehudwh glvlq dwlrq1 Lq frqwudvw dq rssruwxqlvwlf vwudwhj| iru glvlq dwlrq kdv jdlqhg fuhghqfh lq uhfhqw |hduv1 Zh frpsduh wkh delolw| ri wkh wzr dssurdfkhv wr dfklhyh pdfurh0 frqrplf vwdelolw| dqg frqfoxgh wkdw wkh rssruwxqlvwlf dssurdfk lv vxe0rswlpdo zkhq d frpplwphqw phfkdqlvp lv lq sodfh1 Zh vkrz wkdw dq rssruwxqlvwlf lq dwlrq uhvsrqvh lv krzhyhu rswlpdo zkhq wkhuh lv d qrqolqhdulw| ri wkh Skloolsv fxuyh wudgh0r dorqj zlwk dgdswlyh h{shfwdwlrqv0 flufxpvwdqfhv wkdw dsshdu xqolnho| lq frqglwlrqv ri orz lq dwlrq1 MHO fodvvlfdwlrqv= H85> H8; Nh|zrugv= Gholehudwh glvlq dwlrq> Rssruwxqlvwlf glvlq dwlrq> Orvv ixqfwlrq hZh wkdqn Urphu ruuhd/ Yhhqd Plvkud dqg sduwlflsdqwv dw Wkh Iliwk Dqqxdo rqihuhqfh rq Prqh| dqg Ilqdqfh/ 6304wk Iheuxdu| 5336/ LJLGU/ Lqgld/ iru khosixo frpphqwv1 _ruuhvsrqglqj Dxwkru= Qdyhhq Vulqlydvdq/ dugl Exvlqhvv Vfkrro/ roxp Gulyh/ dugl I43 6HX/ Xqlwhg Nlqjgrp1 Who= +35<, 53;:98781 Id{= +35<, 53;:774<1 Hpdlo= VulqlydvdqQNCfi1df1xn 4 L Lqwurgxfwlrq hqwudo edqnv lq glhuhqw frxqwulhv kdyh dgrswhg glhuhqw vwudwhjlhv iru dfklhylqj sulfh vwdelolw|1 Gxulqj wkh 4<<3v vhyhudo frxqwulhv kdyh lqwurgxfhg h{solflw lq dwlrq wdujhwv14 Rqhdssurdfkwrsulfhvwdelolw|lvwrwdnhdgholehudwh sdwk wr dq xowlpdwh jrdo ri orz lq dwlrq1 Lq frqwudvw/ dq rssruwxqlvwlf glvlq dwlrq vwudwhj| vshflhv erwk dq lqwhulp dv zhoo dv d orqj0uxq jrdo iru sulfh vwdelolw|1 Sursrqhqwv ri wklv dssurdfk krog wkdw zkhq lq dwlrq lv prghudwh exw vwloo deryh wkh fhqwudo edqn*v orqj0uxq lq0 dwlrq remhfwlyh/ srolf|pdnhuv vkrxog qrw wdnh gholehudwh dqwl0lq dwlrq dfwlrq/ exw udwkhu vkrxog zdlw iru idyrxudeoh vxsso| vkrfnv dqg xqiruhvhhq uhfhvvlrqv wr gholyhu wkh ghvluhg uhgxfwlrq lq lq dwlrq1 Wklv vwudwhj| kdv jdlqhg vxssruw dprqj vrph surplqhqw fhqwudo edqnhuv dqg dfdghplfv lq uhfhqw |hduv15 rpphqwlqj rq wkh IRP*v vwudwhj| lq wkh 4<<3v/ Dodq Eolqghu +4<<:, zulwhv Xqghu fhuwdlq flufxpvwdqfhv/ wkh rswlpdo glvlq dwlrq vwudwhj| lv dv|pphwulf lq wkh iroorzlqj vshflf zd|= |rx jxdug yljrurxvo| djdlqvw dq| ulvh lq lq dwlrq/ exw zdlw sdwlhqwo| iru wkh qh{w idyrxudeoh lq dwlrq vkrfn wr eulqj lq dwlrq grzq1 Wkh rssru0 wxqlvwlf vwudwhj| pdnhv wkh wlph qhhghg wr dssurdfk wkh xowlpdwh lq dwlrq wdujhw d udqgrp yduldeoh1 Zkhq L zdv wkh Ylfh $kdlupdq ri wkh Ihg/ L riwhq sxw lw wklv zd|= wkh Xqlwhg Vwdwhv lv rqh uhfhvvlrq dzd| iurp sulfh vwdelolw|1 4 Iru dq lq0ghswk dqdo|vlv vhh Ehuqdqnh hw do1 +4<<<,1 5 Iru dfdghplf zrun rq wklv wrslf vhh Ruskdqlghv dqg Zlofr{ +4<<9,/Ruskdqlghvhwdo1 +4<<:, dqg Erpp dqg Uxghexvfk +5333,1 5 H{sodlqlqj wkh rssruwxqlvwlf glvlq dwlrq vwudwhj| Jryhuqru Odxuhqfh Ph|hu +4<<9, qrwhv Xqghu wklv vwudwhj|/ rqfh lq dwlrq ehfrphv prghvw/ dv wrgd|/ Ihghudo Uhvhuyh srolf| lq wkh qhdu whup irfxvhv rq vxvwdlqlqj wuhqg jurzwk dw ixoo hpsor|phqw dw wkh suhydlolqj lq dwlrq udwh1 Dw wklv srlqw wkh vkruw0uxq sulrulwlhv duh wzrirog= vxvwdlq0 lqj wkh h{sdqvlrq dqg suhyhqwlqj dq dffhohudwlrq ri lq dwlrq1 Wklv lv/ qhyhuwkhohvv/ d vwudwhj| iru glvlq dwlrq ehfdxvh lw wdnhv dgydqwdjh ri wkh rssruwxqlw| ri lqhylwdeoh uhfhvvlrq dqg srwhqwldo srvlwlyh vxsso| vkrfnv wr udwfkhw grzq lq dwlrq ryhu wlph1 Lq wklv sdshu zh frpsduh wkh delolw| ri wkh wzr dssurdfkhv wr dfklhyh pdfurhfr0 qrplf vwdelolw| +phdvxuhg lq whupv ri lq dwlrq dqg rxwsxw yduldelolw|, zkhq d srolf|0 pdnhu frpplwv wr d sduwlfxodu vwudwhj|1 Zh dvvxph frpplwphqw rq wkh dvvxpswlrq wkdw wkh fhqwudo edqn kdv ixoo srolwlfdo edfnlqj iru wkh srolf| ri lq dwlrq frqwuro dqg idfhv qr suhvvxuh wr xvh prqhwdu| srolf| wr udlvh wkh orqj0uxq hpsor|phqw udwh> wklv lv wkh xvxdo iudphzrun zlwklq zklfk rssruwxqlvp lv glvfxvvhg1 Wkh nh| glhuhqfh eh0 wzhhq d gholehudwh dqg dq rssruwxqlvwlf srolf|pdnhu lv lq wkh uhdfwlrq wr ghyldwlrqv ri lq dwlrq iurp wdujhw1 Iluvw/ zkloh wkh gholehudwh srolf|pdnhu uhdfwv wr wkh jds ehwzhhq dfwxdo lq dwlrq dqg d orqj0uxq wdujhw/ wkh rssruwxqlvwlf srolf|pdnhu uhdfwv wr wkh jds ehwzhhq dfwxdo lq dwlrq dqg dq lqwhulp wdujhw1 Vhfrqg/ zkloh wkh gholehu0 dwh srolf|pdnhu uhvsrqgv wr wkh lq dwlrq jds lq d olqhdu pdqqhu/ wkh rssruwxqlvwlf srolf|pdnhu*v uhdfwlrq wr wkh jds ehwzhhq dfwxdo lq dwlrq dqg wkh lqwhulp wdujhw lv qrqolqhdu1 Zh ghprqvwudwh wkdw vxfk dv|pphwulhv uhvxow lq kljkhu lq dwlrq yduldelo0 6 lw| xqghu frpplwphqw lq vslwh ri }hur lq dwlrq eldv16 D ixuwkhu txhvwlrq ri lqwhuhvw lv zkdw frqvlghudwlrqv frxog prwlydwh wkh srolf|pdnhu wr dgrsw dq remhfwlyh ixqfwlrq zlwk wkhvh fkdudfwhulvwlfv> klwkhuwr vxfk prghov kdyh ehhq vwxglhg e| dvvxplqj wkdw h{shfwdwlrqv duh dgdswlyh1 Vshflfdoo| zh vkrz wkdw d qrqolqhdu hhfw ri wkh vkrfn rq wkh srvlwlrq ri wkh Skloolsv fxuyh wudgh0r dorqj zlwk dgdswlyh h{shfwdwlrqv surylghv dq rswlpdoo| rssruwxqlvwlf lq dwlrq uhvsrqvh1 Wkh uhvw ri wkh sdshu lv rujdqlvhg dv iroorzv1 Lq vhfwlrq LL zh uhylhz wkh xvxdo gh0 olehudwh dssurdfk wr glvlq dwlrq xqghu frpplwphqw1 Wklv lv iroorzhg e| wkh ghulydwlrq ri wkh rswlpdo lq dwlrq uhvsrqvh xqghu frpplwphqw zkhq d srolf|pdnhu lv rssru0 wxqlvwlf lq vhfwlrq LLL/ zklfk lqfoxghv d frpsdulvrq ri wkh wzr vwudwhjlhv1 Lq vhfwlrq LY zh h{soruh wkh hfrqrplf udwlrqdoh iru rssruwxqlvp dqg frqfoxgh wkdw lw lv prwlydwhg e| srolwlfdo hfrqrp| frqvlghudwlrqv1 Vhfwlrq Y frqfoxghv wkh sdshu1 LL Gholehudwh vwudwhj| xqghu frpplwphqw Wkhuh lv e| qrz zlghvsuhdg djuhhphqw dprqj fhqwudo edqnhuv dqg dfdghplfv dolnh wkdw lq dwlrq wdujhwlqj lq sudfwlfh lv c h{leoh* lq dwlrq wdujhwlqj1 Wkh fhqwudo edqn*v remhfwlyh lv qrw rqo| wr vwdelol}h lq dwlrq durxqg dq h{rjhqrxvo| vshflhg wdujhw/ exw dovr wr sxw vrph zhljkw rq vwdelol}lqj wkh rxwsxw jds17 Wkhuh lv dovr jhqhudo djuhhphqw wkdw lq dwlrq0wdujhwlqj fhqwudo edqnv gr qrw kdyh ryhudpelwlrxv rxwsxw 6 Erpp dqg Uxghexvfk +5333, h{soruh wkh uroh ri lpshuihfw fuhglelolw| dqg rssruwxqlvp lq d prgho zlwk dgdswlyh h{shfwdwlrqv dqg frqfoxgh wkdw rssruwxqlvp lv vxe0rswlpdo1 7 D srvlwlyh zhljkw rq wkh rxwsxw jds lv jhqhudoo| frqvlghuhg wr eh frqvlvwhqw zlwk wkh pdqgdwh 7 wdujhwv1 Khqfh/ glvfuhwlrqdu| rswlpl}dwlrq ãodN|godqg dqg Suhvfrww +4<::, ru Eduur dqg Jrugrq +4<;6,/ grhv qrw uhvxow lq dyhudjh lq dwlrq eldv +vhhEolqghu/4<<:,1 +l, Gholehudwh vwudwhj| xqghu frpplwphqw Wkh wuhdwphqw ri gholehudwh lq dwlrq wdujhwlqj xqghu frpplwphqw iroorzv Vyhqv0 vrq +4<<:,/ zklfk lq wxuq exlogv rq wkh uhfhqw h{whqvlrqv ri wkh dqdo|vlv ri uxohv dqg glvfuhwlrq lq prqhwdu| srolf| lq Orfnzrrg hw do1 +4<<8,1 Wkh vkruw0uxq Skloolsv fxuyh lv e +| ' 4+|3 n k EZ| Z| n0|/ +514, zkhuh +| lv wkh rxwsxw jds lq shulrg |/ k dqg 4 duh frqvwdqwv +k:f dqg f 4 ,/ e Z| lv wkh lq dwlrq udwh/ Z| ghqrwhv h{shfwdwlrqv frqglwlrqdo xsrq lqirupdwlrq dydlodeoh lq shulrg | /dqg0| lv llg huuru/ qrupdoo| glvwulexwhg zlwk phdq }hur dqg yduldqfh 2 j01 Wkh sulydwh vhfwru kdv udwlrqdo h{shfwdwlrqv> wkdw lv/ e Z| ' .|3Z|/ +515, Qrz vxssrvh wkdw wkhuh lv d frpplwphqw phfkdqlvp/ vr wkdw wkh fhqwudo edqn fdq frpplw wr wkh rswlpdo uxoh1 Xqghu frpplwphqw/ wkh rswlpdo uxoh xqghu lq dwlrq wdujhwlqj lv e Z| ' Z| n K0|/ +516, ri pdq| fhqwudo edqnv qrw rqo| wr pdlqwdlq sulfh vwdelolw| exw dovr wr idflolwdwh hfrqrplf jurzwk ryhu wlph1 8 zkhuh/ lq dwlrq lv lqghshqghqw ri wkh odjjhg rxwsxw jds dqg rqo| ghshqgv rq wkh qhz lqirupdwlrq wkdw kdv duulyhg diwhu wkh sulydwh vhfwru iruphg lwv h{shfwdwlrqv1 Zkhq wkh fhqwudo edqn lv frpplwwhg wr d vwdwh0frqwlqjhqw uxoh lq frqgxfwlqj prq0 hwdu| srolf|/ wklv lpsolhv wkdw wkh prqhwdu| dxwkrulw| lqwhuqdol}hv wkh lpsdfw ri lwv ghflvlrq uxoh rq wkh h{shfwdwlrqv ri wkh sulydwh vhfwru1 Lq rwkhu zrugv/ wkh prqhwdu| dxwkrulw| wdnhv lqwr dffrxqw krz lwv dfwlrqv dhfw wkh sulydwh vhfwru*v h{shfwdwlrqv1 Lw grhv wklv e| plqlpl}lqj lwv orvv ixqfwlrq zlwk uhvshfw wr wkh sulydwh vhfwru*v h{shf0 wdwlrqv ri wkh lq dwlrq udwh xqghu wkh h{solflw frqvwudlqw wkdw wkhvh h{shfwdwlrqv duh iruphg udwlrqdoo|1 Wkxv/ +514,/ +515, dqg +516, uhsuhvhqw wkh frqvwudlqwv idflqj wkh fhqwudo edqn1 Wkh fhqwudo edqn*v remhfwlyh xqghu gholehudwh glvlq dwlrq vwudwhj| lv wr vwdelol}h lq dwlrq durxqg d jlyhq +orqj0uxq, lq dwlrq wdujhw/ Z / dv zhoo dv vwdelol}lqj wkh rxwsxw jds durxqg dq rxwsxw jds wdujhw/ + 'f1 Wklv fdq eh uhsuhvhqwhg e| dq lqwhuwhpsrudo orvv ixqfwlrq iru wkh fhqwudo edqn jlyhq e| % & [" 3| .| q u / +517, '| zlwk wkh shulrg orvv ixqfwlrq k l u ' EZ Z 2 n b E+ + 2 / +518, | 2 | | zkhuh b:f lv wkh uhodwlyh zhljkw rq rxwsxw0jds vwdelol}dwlrq1 Wkh fhqwudo edqn lv/ iru vlpsolflw|/ dvvxphg wr kdyh shuihfw frqwuro ryhu wkh lq dwlrq udwh Z|1Lwvhwv 9 wkh lq dwlrq udwh lq hdfk shulrg diwhu kdylqj revhuyhg wkh fxuuhqw vxsso| vkrfn 0|1 Wklv lv d g|qdplf surjudpplqj sureohp zlwk rqh vwdwh yduldeoh/ +|3/ dqg wzr frqwuro e 8 yduldeohv/ Z| dqg Z| /dqgzkhuhq lv wkh glvfrxqw idfwru1 Wkh vroxwlrq fdq eh rewdlqhg e| vroylqj wkh iroorzlqj htxdwlrq lqyroylqj wkh ydoxh ixqfwlrq T E+|1Wkxv/wkh ghflvlrq sureohp ri wkh fhqwudo edqn fdq eh h{suhvvhg dv k l T E+ ' . 4? EZ Z 2 n b E+ + 2 n qT E+ / +519, |3 |3 e | | | Z| / Z| 2 zkhuh wkh plqlpl}dwlrq lq shulrg | lv vxemhfw wr +514,0+516,1Iruwkholqhdu0 txdgudwlf sureohp vxfk dv rxuv/ T E+| pxvw dovr eh txdgudwlf1 Wkxv/ wkh lqgluhfw orvv ixqfwlrq fdq eh zulwwhq dv T E+ ' n + n +2 / +51:, |3 f |3 2 2 |3 vr wkdw T E+|3 ' n 2+|3 dqg r duh wkh xqghwhuplqhg frh!flhqwv1 Xvlqj wklv frqglwlrq wrjhwkhu zlwk Htv1 +514,0+516,/ zh rewdlq wzr uvw0rughu frqglwlrqv e iurp Ht1 +519, zlwk uhvshfw wr Z| dqg Z|/ uhvshfwlyho|= .|3Z| ' Z +51;, > ' EZ| Z bk E+| + kq d n 2 E+| + o +51<, 8 Qrwh wkdw li wkhuh lv
Recommended publications
  • Bessemer Trust a Closer Look Debt Dynamics and Modern Monetary Theory in a Post COVID-19 World
    Debt Dynamics and Modern Monetary Theory in a Post COVID-19 World A Closer Look. Debt Dynamics and Modern Monetary Theory in a Post COVID-19 World. In Brief. • U.S. and other developed economy debt levels are elevated relative to history, sparking questions over the sustainability of the debt and governments’ ability to continue spending to combat the economic impact of the novel coronavirus. • The U.S. post-crisis experience has the potential to differ from that of Japan’s after the 1990s banking crisis as a result of markedly different banking systems. JP Coviello • A post World War II style deleveraging in the U.S. seems less likely given growth Senior Investment dynamics; current labor, capital, productivity, and spending trends are obstacles to Strategist. such a swift deleveraging. • Unprecedented fiscal and monetary support in the wake of COVID-19 creates many questions about how governments can finance large spending programs over longer time horizons. • While the coordinated fiscal and monetary response to the crisis includes aspects of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), a full implementation remains unlikely. However, a review of the theory can be instructive in thinking about these issues and possible policy responses. Governments and central banks around the world have deployed massive amounts of stimulus in Peter Hayward an effort to cushion economies from the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clients, Assistant Portfolio understandably, are concerned about what this could imply over the longer term from a debt and Manager, Fixed Income. deficit perspective. While humanitarian issues are the top priority in a crisis, and spending more now likely means spending less in the future, the financing of these expansionary policies must be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Shocks and the Conduct of Monetary Policy Takatoshi Ito
    Supply Shocks and the Conduct of Monetary Policy Takatoshi Ito As I see it, everybody else has considered this problem. The supply shock is a major challenge to an inflation targeter. It has been agreed that against demand shocks, the inflation targeting is a powerful framework. But probably we have not seen the serious challenge to the inflation targeting framework by supply shocks. Probably the oil price increase in the last year and a half posed some modest challenge to inflation targeters but since we started from very low inflation, it was not really a challenge. Just flipping through Governor Tetangco’s slides, I am sure he will be very elaborate on details of the supply shocks and effects on monetary policy so I will not go into those details. Let me talk about how I think the importance of establishing the inflation targeting framework before supply shock really comes. I still think that inflation targeting is a powerful framework, even against supply shock in addition to demand shocks. The power of inflation targeting framework is that it is to maintain inflation expectations of the public even if you are deviating from the targeted inflation rate. So we discussed about missing targets and so on in the morning session, but the powerful test about whether your inflation targeting framework is successful or credible is, when you deviate for good reasons from the target, does the inflation expectation stay constant? I think this is a good test of the credibility and the success good performance measure of the inflation targeting framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Shocks and Business Cycles
    Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Investment Shocks and Business Cycles Alejandro Justiniano Giorgio E. Primiceri Andrea Tambalotti Staff Report no. 322 March 2008 This paper presents preliminary findings and is being distributed to economists and other interested readers solely to stimulate discussion and elicit comments. The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily reflective of views at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Investment Shocks and Business Cycles Alejandro Justiniano, Giorgio E. Primiceri, and Andrea Tambalotti Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 322 March 2008 JEL classification: C11, E22, E30 Abstract Shocks to the marginal efficiency of investment are the most important drivers of business cycle fluctuations in U.S. output and hours. Moreover, like a textbook demand shock, these disturbances drive prices higher in expansions. We reach these conclusions by estimating a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model with several shocks and frictions. We also find that neutral technology shocks are not negligible, but their share in the variance of output is only around 25 percent and even lower for hours. Labor supply shocks explain a large fraction of the variation of hours at very low frequencies, but not over the business cycle. Finally, we show that imperfect competition and, to a lesser extent, technological frictions are the key to the transmission of investment shocks in the model. Key words: DSGE model, imperfect competition, endogenous markups, Bayesian methods Justiniano: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of Inflation Expectations' Formation
    The Process of Inflation Expectations’ * Formation Anna Loleyt** Ilya Gurov*** Bank of Russia July 2010 Abstract The aim of the investigation is to classify and systematize groups of economic agents with different types of inflation expectations in information economy. Particularly it’s found out that it is not feasible to exclude the possibility of current signals perception by economic agents. The analysis has also shown that there is an uncertainty in economy when authorities redeem monetary policy promises, but their action wouldn’t influence on average inflation expectations of economic agents. The investigation results testify the flat existence of agents in economy which are characterizing with rational, quasi-adaptive (including adaptive) and also arbitral inflation expectations. Keywords: information economy, information signal, information perception, agent belief in information, inflation expectations, quasi-adaptive expectations, arbitral expectations. *Acknowledgments: The first authors gratefully acknowledge support through the Bank of Russia. Especially we would like to thank Mr. Alexey V. Ulyukaev for helpful research assistance and Mrs. Nadezhda Yu. Ivanova for strong support. We are also grateful to Mr. Sergey S. Studnikov for his comments. **General Economic Department, Bank of Russia, 12 Neglinnaya Street, Moscow, 107016 Russia Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Email: [email protected] ***General Economic Department, Bank of Russia, 12 Neglinnaya Street, Moscow, 107016 Russia Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Email: [email protected] Abbreviations: a variety of information signals. W an element of a variety of information signals that is an information signal. w economic agents. x q a number of signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Shocks, Demand Shocks, and Labor Market Fluctuations
    Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series Supply Shocks, Demand Shocks, and Labor Market Fluctuations Helge Braun Reinout De Bock and Riccardo DiCecio Working Paper 2007-015A http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2007/2007-015.pdf April 2007 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS Research Division P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166 ______________________________________________________________________________________ The views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve System, or the Board of Governors. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Papers (other than an acknowledgment that the writer has had access to unpublished material) should be cleared with the author or authors. Supply Shocks, Demand Shocks, and Labor Market Fluctuations Helge Braun Reinout De Bock University of British Columbia Northwestern University Riccardo DiCecio Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis April 2007 Abstract We use structural vector autoregressions to analyze the responses of worker ‡ows, job ‡ows, vacancies, and hours to shocks. We identify demand and sup- ply shocks by restricting the short-run responses of output and the price level. On the demand side we disentangle a monetary and non-monetary shock by restricting the response of the interest rate. The responses of labor market vari- ables are similar across shocks: expansionary shocks increase job creation, the hiring rate, vacancies, and hours. They decrease job destruction and the sep- aration rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Expectations Versus Rational Expectations: Evidence from the Lab
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositori Institucional de la Universitat Jaume I Adaptive Expectations versus Rational Expectations: Evidence from the lab Annarita Colasante1, Antonio Palestrini, Alberto Russo, Mauro Gallegati Universit`aPolitecnica delle Marche, Piazzale Martelli 8, Ancona, Italy. Abstract The aim of the present work is to shed light on the extensive debate about expectations in financial market. We analyze the behavior of subjects in an exper- imental environment in which it is possible to directly observe expectations since the sole task of each player is to predict the future price of an asset. We investi- gate the mechanism of expectation formation in two different contexts: in the first, the fundamental value is constant; in the second, the fundamental price increases over repetitions. First of all we observe if, according to the main results shown in Palestrini and Gallegati (2015), there is a convergence to the rational equilibrium even if agents have adaptive expectations. Moreover, we concentrate on the accu- racy of aggregate forecasts compared with the individual forecasts. We find that there is collective rationality instead of individual rationality. In the context of increasing fundamental value, contrary to the theoretical predictions, players are able to capture the trend but they underestimate that value. This implies that if all agents make their forecasts according to an adaptive scheme, there is no full convergence to the rational expectations equilibrium. Keywords: Price forecasting, Financial market, Experiment, Panel data, Forecasting practice 1. Introduction The recent financial crisis highlighted the importance of agents' behaviour in the financial market and, in turn, the impact of individual financial choices in the real economy.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Keynesian Model with Heterogeneous Expectations
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 33 (2009) 1036–1051 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jedc A New Keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations William A. Branch a, Bruce McGough b,Ã a University of California, Irvine, USA b Department of Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA article info abstract Article history: Within a New Keynesian model, we incorporate bounded rationality at the individual Received 30 January 2008 agent level, and we determine restrictions on expectations operators sufficient to imply Accepted 14 November 2008 aggregate IS and AS relations of the same functional form as those under rationality. This Available online 14 February 2009 result provides dual implications: the strong nature of the restrictions required to JEL classification: achieve aggregation serve as a caution to researchers—imposing heterogeneous E52 expectations at an aggregate level may be ill-advised; on the other hand, accepting E32 the necessary restrictions provides for tractable analysis of expectations heterogeneity. D83 As an example, we consider a case where a fraction of agents are rational and the D84 remainder are adaptive, and find specifications that are determinate under rationality may possess multiple equilibria in case of expectations heterogeneity. Keywords: & 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Heterogeneous expectations Monetary policy Adaptive learning Aggregation 1. Introduction During the
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Kennedy School Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government Study Group, February 28, 2019
    1 Harvard Kennedy School Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government Study Group, February 28, 2019 MMT (Modern Monetary Theory): What Is It and Can It Help? Paul Sheard, M-RCBG Senior Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School ([email protected]) What Is It? MMT is an approach to understanding/analyzing monetary and fiscal operations, and their economic and economic policy implications, that focuses on the fact that governments create money when they run a budget deficit (so they do not have to borrow in order to spend and cannot “run out” of money) and that pays close attention to the balance sheet mechanics of monetary and fiscal operations. Can It Help? Yes, because at a time in which the developed world appears to be “running out” of conventional monetary and fiscal policy ammunition, MMT casts a more optimistic and less constraining light on the ability of governments to stimulate aggregate demand and prevent deflation. Adopting an MMT lens, rather than being blinkered by the current conceptual and institutional orthodoxy, provides a much easier segue into the coordination of monetary and fiscal policy responses that will be needed in the next major economic downturn. Some context and background: - The current macroeconomic policy framework is based on a clear distinction between monetary and fiscal policy and assigns the primary role for “macroeconomic stabilization” (full employment and price stability and latterly usually financial stability) to an independent, technocratic central bank, which uses a “flexible inflation-targeting” framework. - Ten years after the Global Financial Crisis and Great Recession, major central banks are far from having been able to re-stock their monetary policy “ammunition,” government debt levels are high, and there is much hand- wringing about central banks being “the only game in town” and concern about how, from this starting point, central banks and fiscal authorities will be able to cope with another serious downturn.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflationary Expectations and the Costs of Disinflation: a Case for Costless Disinflation in Turkey?
    Inflationary Expectations and the Costs of Disinflation: A Case for Costless Disinflation in Turkey? $0,,993 -44 : Abstract: This paper explores the output costs of a credible disinflationary program in Turkey. It is shown that a necessary condition for a costless disinflationary path is that the weight attached to future inflation in the formation of inflationary expectations exceeds 50 percent. Using quarterly data from 1980 - 2000, the estimate of the weight attached to future inflation is found to be consistent with a costless disinflation path. The paper also uses structural Vector Autoregressions (VAR) to explore the implications of stabilizing aggregate demand. The results of the structural VAR corroborate minimum output losses associated with disinflation. 1. INTRODUCTION Inflationary expectations and aggregate demand pressure are two important variables that influence inflation. It is recognized that reducing inflation through contractionary demand policies can involve significant reductions in output and employment relative to potential output. The empirical macroeconomics literature is replete with estimates of the so- called “sacrifice ratio,” the percentage cumulative loss of output due to a 1 percent reduction in inflation. It is well known that inflationary expectations play a significant role in any disinflation program. If inflationary expectations are adaptive (backward-looking), wage contracts would be set accordingly. If inflation drops unexpectedly, real wages rise increasing employment costs for employers. Employers would then cut back employment and production disrupting economic activity. If expectations are formed rationally (forward- 1 2 looking), any momentum in inflation must be due to the underlying macroeconomic policies. Sargent (1982) contends that the seeming inflation- output trade-off disappears when one adopts the rational expectations framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Deflation: Who Let the Air Out? February 2011
    ® Economic Information Newsletter Liber8 Brought to You by the Research Library of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Deflation: Who Let the Air Out? February 2011 “Inflation that is ‘too low’ can be problematic, as the Japanese experience has shown.” —James Bullard, President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, August 19, 2010 The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Federal Reserve’s policy-setting committee, took further steps in early November 2010 to attempt to alleviate economic strains from a high unemployment rate and falling inflation rates. 1 While it is clear that a high unemployment rate and rapidly increasing prices (inflation) are undesirable for economies, it is less obvious why decreasing prices (deflation) can also restrain economic growth. At its November meeting, the FOMC discussed the potential of further slow growth in prices (disinflation). That month, the price level, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) , was 1 percent higher than it was the previous November. 2 However, less than a year earlier, in December 2009, the year-to-year change was 2.8 percent. While both rates are positive and indicate inflation, the downward trend indicates disinflation. Economists worry about disinfla - tion when the inflation rate is extremely low because it can potentially lead to deflation, a phenomenon that may be difficult for central bankers to combat and can have various negative implications on an economy. While the idea of lower prices may sound attractive, deflation is a real concern for several reasons. Deflation dis - cour ages spending and investment because consumers, expecting prices to fall further, delay purchases, preferring instead to save and wait for even lower prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Models and Methods for Measuring Economic Agent's Expectations
    Overview of models and methods for measuring economic agent's expectations Tine Janžek, Petra Ziherl Abstract Agents' expectations play an important role as one of the basic building blocks of theoretical macroeconomic models. In practise, though, their intangible nature has always caused consistency difficulties regarding their measurement and estimation methods. Increased importance and use of econometric modelling in contemporary financial stability analyses has triggered numerous advances in methods for measuring empirical expectations. Due to the shortage of empirical data for a more detailed evaluation of expectation measures, this article focuses more on the presentation of the most commonly established methods for their capturing and the methodological aspect of the prevailing models. KEYWORDS: expectations, rational expectations, surveys, qualitative measures, quantitative measures, probabilistic measures, visual analog scale, probability approach, regression approach, inflation, VAR. Expectation examination approaches Modern economic theory recognizes that the main difference between economics and natural sciences lies in the forward-looking decisions made by economic agents. Expectations play a key role in every segment of macroeconomics. In consumption theory the paradigm life-cycle and permanent income approaches stress the role of expected future incomes. In investment decisions present-value calculations are conditional on expected future prices and sales. Asset prices (equity prices, interest rates, and exchange rates) also clearly depend on expected future prices. Today we can distinct two major expectation paradigms and concepts, where the second became the mainstream approach for further development of expectation examination: Adaptive expectations (AE) represent a hypothesis in economics which states that people form their expectations about what will happen in the future based on what has happened in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Misspecification of Expectations in New Keynesian Models: a DSGE
    The Misspecification of Expectations in New Keynesian Models: A DSGE-VAR Approach Stephen J. COLE Fabio MILANI∗ Department of Economics Department of Economics University of California, Irvine University of California, Irvine April, 2014 Abstract This paper tests the ability of popular New Keynesian models, which are traditionally used to study monetary policy and business cycles, to match the data regarding a key channel for monetary transmission: the dynamic interactions between macroeconomic variables and their corresponding expectations. In the empirical analysis, we exploit direct data on expectations from surveys. To explain the joint evolution of realized variables and expectations, we adopt a DSGE-VAR approach, which allows us to estimate all models in the continuum between the extremes of an unrestricted VAR, on one side, and a DSGE model in which the cross-equation restrictions are dogmatically imposed, on the other side. Moreover, the DSGE-VAR approach allows us to assess the extent, as well as the main sources, of misspecification in the model. The paper’s results illustrate the failure of New Keynesian models under the rational expec- tations hypothesis to account for the dynamic interactions between observed macroeconomic expectations and macroeconomic realizations. Confirming previous studies, DSGE restrictions prove valuable when the New Keynesian model is exempted from matching observed expecta- tions. But when the model is required to match data on expectations, it can do so only by moving away, and hence substantially rejecting, DSGE restrictions. Finally, we investigate alternative models of expectations formation, including examples of extrapolative and heterogeneous expectations, and show that they can go some way toward reconciling the New Keynesian model with the data.
    [Show full text]