DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Examination of Electromagnetic Features: An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Examination of Electromagnetic Features: An Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Archaeological Examination of Electromagnetic Features: An Example from the French Dwelling Site: A Late Eighteenth Century Plantation Site in Natchez, Adams County, Mississippi Charles F. Lawson Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FEATURES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE FRENCH DWELLING SITE. A LATE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY PLANTATION SITE IN NATCHEZ, ADAMS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. By CHARLES F. LAWSON A Thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004 The Members of the Committee approve the thesis of Charles F. Lawson defended on March 23, 2004. ________________________ Glen Doran Professor Directing Thesis ________________________ Bruce Grindal Committee Member ________________________ David Anderson Committee Member Approved: _____________________________________________________________________ Dean Falk, Chairperson, Anthropology Department The office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Jill Halchin of the Southeast Archeological Center for generously allowing me to use not only her field research, but also her time throughout the production of this manuscript. Her attention to detail during artifact analysis and when reading drafts has allowed me to produce a better document. I would also like to thank John Cornelison who graciously provided me with a computerized spreadsheet for use in my statistical analysis. Over the past few years John has also taught me many of the computer and archeological skills I needed to complete this document. I would also like to thank the members of my committee for the time they spent reading the document and preparing comments. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures..................................................................................................................viii Abstract.............................................................................................................................. xi 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 2. Natchez Cultural and Historic Background.................................................................... 5 Prehistoric Natchez......................................................................................................... 5 French Settlement 1699 to 1763 ..................................................................................... 7 British Settlement 1763 to 1779 ................................................................................... 10 Spanish Administration 1779 to 1798 .......................................................................... 12 United States Territory 1798 to 1817 ........................................................................... 13 3. Previous Archaeological Investigations at 22AD557................................................... 15 4. 2001 Geophysical Survey ............................................................................................. 19 Magnetometer ............................................................................................................... 21 Conductivity Meter....................................................................................................... 22 The Surveys .................................................................................................................. 23 5. Re-Examination of the 1977 Archaeological Survey ................................................... 28 6. 2001 Archaeological Survey and Excavations ............................................................ 35 Surface Collection......................................................................................................... 35 Excavation Units........................................................................................................... 36 7. Material Culture............................................................................................................ 53 Ceramics ....................................................................................................................... 60 Glass.............................................................................................................................. 72 Personal Items............................................................................................................... 78 Building Components ................................................................................................... 78 Faunal Materials ........................................................................................................... 84 iv 8. Site Interpretation ......................................................................................................... 86 Artifact Distribution by Functional Group ................................................................... 86 Robinson’s Index of Agreement for Intra-site Comparisons........................................ 92 Mean Ceramic Dating................................................................................................. 103 Functional Interpretation of Features.......................................................................... 104 9. Conclusions................................................................................................................. 110 References....................................................................................................................... 116 Biographical Sketch........................................................................................................ 123 v LIST OF TABLES 1. Preliminary Artifact Categories.................................................................................... 54 2. Historic Artifacts Collected by Function...................................................................... 55 3. Prehistoric Artifacts Collected by Function.................................................................. 56 4. Prehistoric Artifacts Collected at the French Dwelling Site......................................... 57 5. Ceramics recovered during the testing at 22AD557..................................................... 64 6. Glass artifacts sorted by category classification and object. ........................................ 72 7. Personal Items Recovered During Testing at the French Dwelling Site. ..................... 79 8. Building Components Recovered by Weight. .............................................................. 83 9. Faunal Material Recovered by Type............................................................................. 85 10. Biomass Estimates Based on the Faunal Collection from 22AD557. ........................ 85 11. Site Proveniences Chosen for Index of Agreement Analysis..................................... 95 12. The Artifact Categories Used to Produce the IA Matrix for the Site Features by Object Name. ............................................................................................................ 96 13. The Artifact Categories Used to Produce the IA Matrix for the Site Features by Functional Group. ..................................................................................................... 97 14. Index of Agreement Matrix Produced for Site Proveniences from 22AD557 by Object Name and Artifact Weight........................................................................................ 98 15. Index of Agreement Matrix Produced for Site Proveniences from 22AD557 by Functional Group and Artifact Weight. .................................................................... 99 vi 16. Mean Ceramic Dates for the French Dwelling Site.................................................. 105 17. Artifact Categories by Percent of Weight from Each Feature. ................................. 109 18. Possible and Known French Period Ceramics Compared to Later Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Ceramics Collected in 2001. .................................................. 113 vii LIST OF FIGURES 1. Location of the project area in Natchez, Mississippi...................................................... 3 2. Broutin's map depicting Natchez in 1728....................................................................... 9 3. Location of Bonath's 1977 project grid and excavation units (blue) in relation to the 2001 project area (red) that is the subject of this thesis............................................ 16 4. The geophysical grid at the French Dwelling Site, displaying which areas were surveyed using the FM-36 gradiometer and the EM-38 conductivity meter............ 20 5. Four displays of the magnetic data recovered during the FM-36 survey ..................... 26 6. Three displays of the conductivity data recovered during the EM-38 survey at the French Dwelling Site.. .............................................................................................. 27 7. The brick distribution collected during the 1977 survey.............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Foundation Document Overview Natchez National Historical Park Mississippi
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Natchez National Historical Park Mississippi Contact Information For more information about the Natchez National Historical Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 601-442-7047 or write to: Superintendent, 640 South Canal Street, Box E, Natchez, MS 39120 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Natchez National Historical Park resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. 1. Woven into the historic fabric of Natchez, Mississippi, Natchez National Historical Park provides an opportunity to explore the world of the antebellum cotton economy on the Lower Mississippi River, a culture derived from a slave-based plantation system that generated a concentration of wealth and power unparalleled among other American cities at that time. 2. Natchez National Historical Park provides a connection to The purpose of the world of the enslaved people of African descent who NATCHEZ NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK were sold by the thousands at the Forks of the Road slave is to preserve and interpret the complex market, fought for their freedom in the Civil War, and assumed prominent positions as political leaders during history and material culture of all Reconstruction, including the first African American to sit the peoples of Natchez, Mississippi, in either house of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana and the French Colonial Period 2
    1 The HistoricLouisiana and theLouisiana French Colonial Period New Orleans and the Collection French MUSEUM • RESEARCH CENTER • PUBLISHER Colonial Period Teacher’s guide: grade levels 6–8 Number of class periods: 4 Copyright © 2016 The Historic New Orleans Collection; copyright © 2016 The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History All rights reserved. Copyright © 2016 The Historic New Orleans Collection | www.hnoc.org | copyright © 2016 The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History | www.gilderlehrman.org Louisiana and the French Colonial Period 2 Louisiana and the French Colonial Period Metadata Grade levels 6–8 Number of class periods: 4 What’s Inside Lesson One....p. 4 Lesson Two....p. 11 Lesson Three....p. 15 Lesson Four....p. 20 Common Core Standards CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.1: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.2: Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.6-8.4: Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including vocabulary specific to domains related to history/social studies. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.SL.8.1: Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 8 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly. The Historic New Orleans Collection, 533 Royal Street, New Orleans,
    [Show full text]
  • The French Natchez Settlement According to the Memory of Dumont De Montigny
    The French Natchez Settlement According to the Memory of Dumont de Montigny TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………..…...1 Chapter Two: Dumont de Montigny………………………………………….......15 Chapter Three: French Colonial Architecture………………………………….....28 Chapter Four: The Natchez Settlement: Analysis of Dumont’s Maps…..………..43 Chapter Five: Conclusion…………………………………………………………95 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..105 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Vincas Steponaitis for his endless support and guidance throughout the whole research and writing process. I would also like to thank my defense committee, Dr. Anna Agbe-Davies and Dr. Kathleen Duval, for volunteering their time. Finally I would like to thank Dr. Elizabeth Jones who greatly assisted me by translating portions of Dumont’s maps. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Natchez settlement, founded in 1716, was one of the many settlements founded by the French in the Louisiana Colony. Fort Rosalie was built to protect the settlers and concessions from the dangers of the frontier. Despite the military presence, the Natchez Indians attacked the settlement and destroyed the most profitable agricultural venture in Louisiana. While this settlement has not been excavated, many first-hand accounts exist documenting events at the settlement. The account this paper is concerned with is the work of Dumont de Montigny, a lieutenant and engineer in the French Army. Dumont spent his time in Louisiana creating plans and drawings of various French establishments, one of which being Fort Rosalie and the Natchez settlement. Upon his return to France, Dumont documented his experiences in Natchez in two forms, an epic poem and a prose memoir. Included in these works were detailed maps of Louisiana and specifically of the Natchez settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 European Colonization in Mississippi
    6 EUROPEAN COLONIZATION IN MISSISSIPPI1 JACK D. ELLIOTT, JR. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to identify the cultural resources of Mississippi pertaining to the Period of European Colonization. The cultural resources include both sites and buildings. The term “sites” is the more inclusive of the two terms. Sites are the places at which past activities occurred and consequently include sites on which are located historic building, sites with archaeological remains, and even sites which were the scenes of past activities, yet at which there are no extant physical remains other than the physical landscape, associated with those events. The Period of European Colonization is separated from the preceding Period of European Exploration by the beginning of permanent European settlement. Permanent settlement is particularly important for the aspect of historic preservation programs that deal with Euro-American culture in that it marks the inception of a time period in which we first find significant numbers of sites and other remains of occupation. Prior to the beginning of permanent European settlement in Mississippi the European presence was confined to merely sporadic expeditions and wanderers that seldomed on the same site for more than a season at most. Such sites have typically been difficult if not impossible to identify. It has only been with the inception of permanent European settlement that we first have settlements that were sufficiently permanent that they can be identified through maps, written sources, and archaeological remains. Consequently, the distinction between the periods of exploration and colonization is more fundamental than that between the period of colonization and the succeeding periods under American jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Age of Mound Construction at Mazique
    AN EXPLORATION OF THE AGE OF MOUND CONSTRUCTION AT MAZIQUE (22AD502), A LATE PREHISTORIC MOUND CENTER IN ADAMS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI by DANIEL ANDERSON LADU A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 © Daniel Anderson LaDu 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Submitted by Daniel Anderson LaDu in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts specializing in Anthropology. Accepted on behalf of the Faculty of the Graduate School by the thesis committee: _________________________ C. Hobson Bryan, Ph.D. _________________________ Jason DeCaro, Ph.D. _________________________ Vernon James Knight, Ph.D. _________________________ Kathryn S. Oths, Ph.D. _________________________ Ian W. Brown, Ph.D. Chairperson _________________________ Michael D. Murphy, Ph.D. Department Chairperson _________________________ Date _________________________ David A. Francko, Ph.D Dean of the Graduate School _________________________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to a great many folks for their support in making this thesis possible. First, I would like to thank my advisor and mentor Dr. Ian W. Brown for his patience, wisdom, and guidance. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. C. Hobson Bryan, Dr. Jason DeCaro, Dr. Vernon James Knight, and Dr. Kathryn S. Oths, who provided honest and constructive feedback on earlier drafts of this work that greatly improved the final outcome. Furthermore, I am grateful for the support of my fellow graduate students and friends, Jeremy Davis, Elizabeth Davis, Lauren Downs, Paul Eubanks, Cameron Lacquement, Jayur Mehta, Meg Sorber and Leah Williams, as well as the entire UA Anthropology Club for the donation of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Natchez in Saint Domingue, 1731-1791 in 1731, a French Army
    Smyth – Draft – Please do not cite or circulate Natchez in Saint Domingue, 1731-1791 In 1731, a French army in colonial Louisiana and their Choctaw allies attacked Natchez towns along the banks of the Mississippi River, one hundred and seventy miles north of New Orleans. After days of battle, hundreds of Natchez fled the area but four hundred and thirty eight Natchez surrendered to the French, who then proceeded to enslave them and send them to Saint Domingue.1 This paper explores the process of Natchez enslavement by the French and examines trace archival sources from Saint Domingue about Natchez and other indigenous slaves. This paper comes out of my larger project on Natchez history, which is primarily focused on what I’m calling a Natchez diaspora spread across the colonial southeast. My dissertation research shows how Natchez communities stayed connected through an indigenous diasporic network in which they adapted to living with other Native Americans such as the Creeks and Cherokees during the eighteenth century.2 While much of my study of the Natchez is about how they survived as self-identifying communities of Natchez people in North America to the 21st century, this paper focuses on the enslaved Natchez in Saint Domingue, who, over time, no longer identified as Natchez. This study of the Natchez in Saint Domingue adds to our general understanding of the history of the French Atlantic, early modern slavery, and specifically to Natchez history. After hundreds of Natchez were enslaved and sent to Saint Domingue and never returned, the Natchez never forgot this injustice of French violence.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions by Ned Hémard
    NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard Bienville, An Intimate Portrait Which Louisiana governor had a serpent tattooed on his body, a personal assistant named “Bon Temps” and once had his eyes on a beautiful Cadillac? If you answered Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, Sieur de Bienville, you’d be correct. But how, you may ask, can that be? Jean Baptiste Le Moyne, Sieur de Bienville (February 23, 1680 – March 7, 1767), was the son of Charles Le Moyne (born near Dieppe) and Catherine Thierry Primot (born in Rouen, both cities in Normandy). Charles Le Moyne (once an indentured servant to the Jesuits) established his family in the settlement of Ville-Marie (present day Montréal) at an early age and fathered quite a large family. Bienville, Founding Father of Louisiana We know of Bienville, born in Montréal, Québec, Canada, as the founder of of New Orleans, Louisiana, and co-founder of Mobile, Alabama. One of fourteen children and younger brother of explorer Pierre Le Moyne, Sieur d’Iberville, Bienville was an early governor of French Colonial Louisiana (serving multiple times during the years 1701-1743). He also boldy turned around an English ship at English Turn, in perhaps the most famous, yet consequential bluff, in Louisiana history. But what more do we know about this French-Canadian colonizer and founder of New Orleans? After studying at the Sulpician Seminary in Montréal, he began his career at the very young age of twelve, entering the French Navy as a midshipman. He first served under the command of his older brother, Iberville, at Newfoundland and at Hudson Bay during the War of the Grand Alliance, also known as the Nine Years' War (1688 - 1697).
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview, Natchez National Historical Park, Mississippi
    NatioNal Park Service • U.S. DePartmeNt of the iNterior Foundation Document Overview Natchez National Historical Park Mississippi Contact Information For more information about the Natchez National Historical Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 601-442-7047 or write to: Superintendent, 640 South Canal Street, Box E, Natchez, MS 39120 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Natchez National Historical Park resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. 1. Woven into the historic fabric of Natchez, Mississippi, Natchez National Historical Park provides an opportunity to explore the world of the antebellum cotton economy on the Lower Mississippi River, a culture derived from a slave-based plantation system that generated a concentration of wealth and power unparalleled among other American cities at that time. 2. Natchez National Historical Park provides a connection to The purpose of the world of the enslaved people of African descent who NATCHEZ NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK were sold by the thousands at the Forks of the Road slave is to preserve and interpret the complex market, fought for their freedom in the Civil War, and assumed prominent positions as political leaders during history and material culture of all Reconstruction, including the first African American to sit the peoples of Natchez, Mississippi, in either house of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubah and Nashoba: an Artful History
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2019 Jubah and Nashoba: An Artful History Theodore Cecil DeCelles Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation DeCelles, Theodore Cecil, "Jubah and Nashoba: An Artful History" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11515. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11515 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creative Dissertation Jubah and Nashoba: An Artful History Submitted by Theodore Cecil DeCelles Department of Interdisciplinary Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Montana Fall 2019 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Kathleen Kane Wade Davies George Price Prageeta Sharma Heather Cahoon i ABSTRACT This creative dissertation unites art and history by writing a play using extensive historical research. The main body of work focuses on events surrounding the Natchez Revolt of 1729. The Natchez nation and colonial Louisianans attempted to accommodate each other by reaching a middle ground. Nonetheless, incivility culminated in a massacre at Fort Rosalie. The Natchez experienced profound sociopolitical changes that resulted in a downgrade of female power. North American history asserts many female chiefs interacted with colonial male leaders. Even so, female chiefs have remained at the margins of history.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Natchez Diaspora: A History of Indigenous Displacement and Survival in the Atlantic World Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/05k3f9xj Author Smyth, Edward Glenn Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ THE NATCHEZ DIASPORA: A HISTORY OF INDIGENOUS DISPLACEMENT AND SURVIVAL IN THE ATLANTIC WORLD A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Edward Noel Smyth September 2016 The Dissertation of Edward Smyth is approved: _______________________________ Professor Marilyn Westerkamp, chair _______________________________ Professor Lisbeth Haas _______________________________ Associate Professor Amy Lonetree _______________________________ Associate Professor Gregory O’Malley ___________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Edward Smyth 2016 Table of Contents Abstract iv Acknowledgments vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1 – Natchez and French Relations, 1682-1730s 18 Chapter 2 – Hoping to Return: Natchez Slaves in Saint Domingue 54 Chapter 3 – Negotiating Diaspora: Natchez Survival Along Chickasaw Networks 81 Chapter 4 – The Natchez Disaporic Network 118 Chapter 5 – The Natchez among the Upper Creeks, 1738-1838 139 Chapter 6 – “The End of the Natchez”? 162 Epilogue 193 Bibliography 198 iii Abstract The Natchez
    [Show full text]
  • European Explorations and the Louisiana Purchase
    LOUISIANA: EUROPEAN EXPLORATIONS AND THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE A SPECIAL PRESENTATION FROM THE GEOGRAPHY AND MAP DIVISION OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Table of Contents A Brief History of Louisiana to 1812 A Question of Boundaries European Explorations and Encounters Early Spanish Interests French Canada Explores the Mississippi River Valley Louisiana as a French Colony Difficult Early Years of the Colony Bienville and the Founding of New Orleans Hostilities on the Frontier Louisiana under Vaudreuil and Kerlérec The Lively Arts in Colonial and Territorial Louisiana Contest for Sovereignty over the Mississippi Valley Frontier in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries Early European Designs on the Mississippi Valley The Mississippi Valley during the French and Indian War British Designs on the Mississippi Valley before the American Revolution Louisiana under Spanish Rule Diplomacy of the French Cession Spanish Rule and a Revolt Louisiana in the American Revolution Spanish Louisiana’s Development to 1803 Land Settlement Policies and Practices in Spanish Louisiana Spain Recognizes American Rights on the Mississippi, 1795 Waning Spanish Interest in the Mississippi Valley Pinckney’s Treaty The Louisiana Purchase Napoleonic France Acquires Louisiana "There is on the globe one single spot" "The Mississippi is everything" "A noble bargain" Louisiana Becomes an American Territory Louisiana is Transferred to the United States The Cartographic Setting: Evolving European and American Conceptions of Louisiana to 1803 Earliest Renderings of Louisiana French
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10400 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (R«v. M6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Grand Village of the Natchez Site other names/site number Fatherland Plantation Site (22-Ad-501) 2. Location street & number 400 Jefferson Davis Boulevard I I not for publication city, town Natchez T I vicinity state Mississippi code MS county Adams code 001 zip code 3, Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district ____ ____ buildings fx"l public-State Uclsite 1 1 sites I I public-Federal I I structure 3 2 structures I I object ______ _____ objects A 3 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this LI nomination LI request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]