Parasites and Social Insects P Schmid-Hempel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasites and Social Insects P Schmid-Hempel Parasites and social insects P Schmid-Hempel To cite this version: P Schmid-Hempel. Parasites and social insects. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 1995, 26 (3), pp.255-271. hal-00891263 HAL Id: hal-00891263 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00891263 Submitted on 1 Jan 1995 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Review article Parasites and social insects P Schmid-Hempel ETH Zürich, Experimental Ecology, ETH-Zentrum, NW, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland (Received 23 December 1994; accepted 8 March 1995) Summary — A short review shows that social insects have many parasites on larvae and adults but few on eggs. Social organisation simultaneously affects parasite transmission within and between colonies. Overall, the biology of social insects may be favourable to an epidemic, but such a process may quickly die out in the host population. social insects / parasite / polyandry / social organisation / epidemiology INTRODUCTION the final host of the parasite (Moore, 1983). Such changes of host behaviour which increase the chances of transmission for Under natural conditions, organisms are the parasite seem not to be uncommon and exposed to a wide range of parasites that may have consequences for may threaten their survival and reproduc- larger-scale (see Dobson, 1988; tive success. Research over the past 2 population dynamics for discussion). decades has broadened our knowledge and demonstrated that the effects of parasitism Social insects as hosts are no different may often be quite subtle rather than obvi- from other organisms, but the investigation ous. For example, a number of studies have of their parasites has been largely neglected, documented subtle behavioural changes of with the exceptions of commercially impor- the infected hosts that often seem to favour tant species (eg, honey bees; Bailey and the parasite. Many species of acanto- Ball, 1991), pest species (eg, fire ants; Jou- cephalan parasites seem to rely on inducing venaz, 1983), and studies of social para- changes in host behaviour to facilitate trans- sitism and inquilines (mostly in ants and mission to the next host (Moore, 1984). An bees; eg, Lin, 1964; Fisher, 1988). For infected isopod which serves as an inter- example, similar observations on mediate host will become positively photo- behavioural changes have been made in tactic and stay in exposed areas more fre- the classic case of a parasite infecting a quently than their uninfected counterparts. social insect. The liver fluke (Dicrocoelium) As a consequence, the infected host is more infects wood ants as intermediate hosts. likely to be preyed upon by a bird which is The infected ant changes its behaviour so as to climb onto exposed parts of its habitat infection intensity often show a positive cor- (eg, grass tips), where the ant will normally relation with group size (Davies et al, 1991; stay until eaten by the final host of the fluke, Keymer and Read, 1991). Negative corre- a herbivorous mammal such as a sheep lations have been reported for some vector- (Hohorst and Graefe, 1961; Schneider and transmitted diseases (Poulin and Fitzgerald, Hohorst, 1971). 1989). A possible cause for this difference rate con- Parasites can have additional effects on may be related to the increased of hosts. Snails infected by the trematode tacts in large groups that facilitates the trans- Schistosoma (the causative agent of human fer of directly transmitted parasites, and, at bilharzia) change their life history by increas- the same time a dilution effect that reduces the rate of vector attacks ing fecundity early in life at the expense of per capita (’the later reproduction. Minchella and Loverde selfish herd’). Besides this, the spread of (1981) demonstrated that such altered an infection within a group is likely to pro- fecundity schedules benefit the host ceed more rapidly than the spread of the because parasitism leads to castration of infection between groups. Such sugges- tions have been made for human the snail at an older age. Parasites have smallpox in African households and also been implicated in the pattern of geo- (Becker Angulo, graphical distribution of species because 1981), a population that for many purposes is structured in similar to social insect parasites could act as weapons of compe- ways tition among their hosts (Price et al, 1986, populations. Furthermore, fitness effects of have been for animals 1988). In fact, some drastic cases of range parasitism reported reduction in birds and ungulates have been living in groups, eg, cliff swallows that have traced back to the action of parasites (Dob- high levels of ectoparasitism (Brown and son and Hudson, 1986). More recent work Brown, 1986). Such evidence strongly sug- has concentrated on the hypothesis that gests that we should be concerned about entire species communities may be affected parasitism in social insects, and that in fact by the presence of parasites (Dobson and social insects may be highly suitable study Crawley, 1994). Finally, parasites have also objects for investigating the interactions been assigned a prominent role for the evo- between parasitism and social organisation. lution of sexual selection and mate choice This paper discusses a somewhat arbitrary (Andersson, 1994), an area of interest which selection of issues on host-parasite inter- has grown explosively over the last years. actions in social insects. Parasites should be especially important for social this has species, although aspect PARASITES OF SOCIAL INSECTS often been neglected in discussions on the evolution of sociality. In social animals, par- asites can be contracted by many individ- Colonies of social insects should be a highly uals and subsequently may threaten many rewarding target for parasites, because they members of the social group. For this rea- offer both a locally high density of potential son, it has been suggested that character- hosts and, at the same time, an assemblage istics which at first sight seem quite dis- of hosts that (on a crude level) are geneti- parate, such as group aggression towards cally more similar to each other than the newcomers, territory maintenance, or group population average. In discussions of mod- size, may all have evolved to prevent novel ern epidemiology and evolutionary ecology infections from being introduced to the group it is usual to use the category of micropara- (Alexander, 1974; Freeland, 1976). Indeed, sites which refers to parasites whose the number of parasite species per host and dynamics can be described by referring to infected, uninfected (susceptible), or resis- whether this lack of egg parasites is real or tant hosts (’SIR models’, Anderson and May, reflects a lack of studies. Given the many 1981). Viruses, bacteria, and protozoa would taxa of parasitic wasps that specialise on all qualify for this category despite the many eggs of lepidoptera (Strand, 1986), this defi- differences in their biology. On the other ciency is remarkable and is possibly the hand, macroparasites are those parasites result of the widespread mode of brood care where the dynamics can be better described and the use of sheltered nest sites that may by looking at individual parasites and their make eggs difficult to utilise for most para- fate within hosts (’Sir model", Anderson and sitoids. Consequently, if present at all, the May, 1981). Helminths, such as trematodes most likely targets of egg parasites must be and nematodes, fall into this category. surface nesters, a nesting habit found in Finally, social insects are hosts to para- many wasps and some bees. sitoids and social I will not dis- parasites. Larval parasites, on the other hand, are cuss the case of subsocial which arthropods, quite common, but these often include infec- shed an extra on the of the may light origin tious parasites. This may reflect the fact that association between social insects and their infectious diseases can readily spread within parasites. a nest once infected. It is unclear, however, A brief survey of the literature will show why eggs are not attacked at the same time, that a wide variety of parasites of all cate- but essentially a similar absence of infec- gories are associated with social insects tious diseases of eggs is also true for non- (table I). As in other organisms, parasites social insects. Possibly, it is simply more can attack different life cycle stages of the difficult to penetrate the egg and its chorion. host (table II). In social insects, this would Another reason may be the fact that infec- include eggs, larvae, pupae and adults, and tions cannot be easily transmitted by the we may, for practical reasons, add the nest eggs since they are immobile and will not as such, for example, its supporting structure easily get in contact with new hosts, unless (eg, wax) or debris. In termites, which have the mode of brood care ensures transmis- a hemimetabolous development, different sion. In polydomous social insects eggs and nymphal stages could be the target of para- brood are often carried from one nest to the sites. Furthermore, parasites may infect a other and thus infections may easily spread particular stage, eg, the larva, but be trans- to different nests within the colony. mitted to the next host or a vector by A large number of parasites attack work- from the or adult. An another, eg, pupa ers. These include viruses, bacteria, fungi, example is the microsporidian Burenella protozoa, helminths, and parasitoids (table the fire ant dimorpha infecting Solenopsis.
Recommended publications
  • Universidad De El Salvador Diversidad Y Nidificación De Abejas Sin Aguijón (Apidae: Meliponinae) En Dos Comunidades Vegetales
    UNIVERSIDAD DE EL SALVADOR FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MATEMÁTICA ESCUELA DE BIOLOGÍA DIVERSIDAD Y NIDIFICACIÓN DE ABEJAS SIN AGUIJÓN (APIDAE: MELIPONINAE) EN DOS COMUNIDADES VEGETALES EN EL PARQUE ECOTURÍSTICO TEHUACÁN, EL SALVADOR. TRABAJO DE GRADUACIÓN PRESENTADO POR: DIEGO ENRIQUE GALÁN HERNÁNDEZ PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE: LICENCIADO EN BIOLOGÍA CIUDAD UNIVERSITARIA, SAN SALVADOR MAYO DE 2019 UNIVERSIDAD DE EL SALVADOR FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MATEMÁTICA ESCUELA DE BIOLOGÍA DIVERSIDAD Y NIDIFICACIÓN DE ABEJAS SIN AGUIJÓN (APIDAE: MELIPONINAE) EN DOS COMUNIDADES VEGETALES EN EL PARQUE ECOTURÍSTICO TEHUACÁN, EL SALVADOR. TRABAJO DE GRADUACIÓN PRESENTADO POR: DIEGO ENRIQUE GALÁN HERNÁNDEZ PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE: LICENCIADO EN BIOLOGÍA DOCENTE ASESOR: LIC. CARLOS ALBERTO ELÍAS ORTÍZ CIUDAD UNIVERSITARIA, SAN SALVADOR MAYO DE 2019 UNIVERSIDAD DE EL SALVADOR FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MATEMÁTICA ESCUELA DE BIOLOGÍA DIVERSIDAD Y NIDIFICACIÓN DE ABEJAS SIN AGUIJÓN (APIDAE: MELIPONINAE) EN DOS COMUNIDADES VEGETALES EN EL PARQUE ECOTURÍSTICO TEHUACÁN, EL SALVADOR. TRABAJO DE GRADUACIÓN PRESENTADO POR: DIEGO ENRIQUE GALÁN HERNÁNDEZ PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE: LICENCIADO EN BIOLOGÍA CIUDAD UNIVERSITARIA, SAN SALVADOR MAYO 2019. UNIVERSIDAD DE EL SALVADOR RECTOR MTRO ROGER ARMANDO ARIAS ALVARADO VICERRECTOR ACADÉMICO DR. MANUEL DE JESÚS JOYA ABREGO VICERRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVO ING. NELSON BERNABÉ GRANADOS SECRETARIO GENERAL LIC. CRISTOBAL HERNÁN RÍOS BENÍTEZ FISCAL LIC. RAFAEL HUMBERTO PEÑA MARÍN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MATEMÁTICA DECANO LIC. MAURICIO HERNÁN LOVO CÓRDOVA VICEDECANO LIC. CARLOS ANTONIO QUINTANILLA APARICIO DIRECTORA ESCUELA DE BIOLOGÍA M. Sc. ANA MARTHA ZETINO CALDERON AGRADECIMIENTOS Primero, está de más decir que agradezco a Dios, ya que quien diga que soy ateo y que no creo en lo perfecto se equivoca, todo se lo debo a él; la vida, mis capacidades, mis defectos y mis virtudes, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Mi Bee Lab 9-21-1990 Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera) Charles D. Michener University of Kansas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Michener, Charles D., "Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)" (1990). Mi. Paper 153. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Bee Lab at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 WWvyvlrWryrXvW-WvWrW^^ I • • •_ ••^«_«).•>.• •.*.« THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCIENC5;^ULLETIN LIBRARY Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 75-164 Sept. 21,1990 OCT 23 1990 HARVARD Classification of the Apidae^ (Hymenoptera) BY Charles D. Michener'^ Appendix: Trigona genalis Friese, a Hitherto Unplaced New Guinea Species BY Charles D. Michener and Shoichi F. Sakagami'^ CONTENTS Abstract 76 Introduction 76 Terminology and Materials 77 Analysis of Relationships among Apid Subfamilies 79 Key to the Subfamilies of Apidae 84 Subfamily Meliponinae 84 Description, 84; Larva, 85; Nest, 85; Social Behavior, 85; Distribution, 85 Relationships among Meliponine Genera 85 History, 85; Analysis, 86; Biogeography, 96; Behavior, 97; Labial palpi, 99; Wing venation, 99; Male genitalia, 102; Poison glands, 103; Chromosome numbers, 103; Convergence, 104; Classificatory questions, 104 Fossil Meliponinae 105 Meliponorytes,
    [Show full text]
  • Stingless Bee Nesting Biology David W
    Stingless bee nesting biology David W. Roubik To cite this version: David W. Roubik. Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2006, 37 (2), pp.124-143. hal-00892207 HAL Id: hal-00892207 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892207 Submitted on 1 Jan 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 37 (2006) 124–143 124 c INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2006 DOI: 10.1051/apido:2006026 Review article Stingless bee nesting biology* David W. Ra,b a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panamá, República de Panamá b Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA Received 2 October 2005 – Revised 29 November 2005 – Accepted 23 December 2005 Abstract – Stingless bees diverged since the Cretaceous, have 50 times more species than Apis,andare both distinctive and diverse. Nesting is capitulated by 30 variables but most do not define clades. Both architectural features and behavior decrease vulnerability, and large genera vary in nest habit, architecture and defense. Natural stingless bee colony density is 15 to 1500 km−2. Symbionts include mycophagic mites, collembolans, leiodid beetles, mutualist coccids, molds, and ricinuleid arachnids.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in Stingless Bees
    Insect. Soc. (2016) 63:223–236 DOI 10.1007/s00040-016-0468-0 Insectes Sociaux REVIEW ARTICLE Warfare in stingless bees 1,2 1,3 4 5 C. Gru¨ter • L. G. von Zuben • F. H. I. D. Segers • J. P. Cunningham Received: 24 August 2015 / Revised: 28 January 2016 / Accepted: 6 February 2016 / Published online: 29 February 2016 Ó International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2016 Abstract Bees are well known for being industrious pol- how victim colonies are selected, but a phylogenetically linators. Some species, however, have taken to invading the controlled analysis suggests that the notorious robber bee nests of other colonies to steal food, nest material or the nest Lestrimelitta preferentially attacks colonies of species with site itself. Despite the potential mortality costs due to more concentrated honey. Warfare among bees poses many fighting with an aggressive opponent, the prospects of a interesting questions, including why species differ so large bounty can be worth the risk. In this review, we aim to greatly in their response to attacks and how these alternative bring together current knowledge on intercolony fighting strategies of obtaining food or new nest sites have evolved. with a view to better understand the evolution of warfare in bees and identify avenues for future research. A review of Keywords Stingless bees Á Warfare Á literature reveals that at least 60 species of stingless bees are Alternative foraging strategies Á Cleptoparasitism Á involved in heterospecific conflicts, either as attacking or Lestrimelitta Á Meliponini victim colonies. The threat of invasion has led to the evo- lution of architectural, behavioural and morphological adaptations, such as narrow entrance tunnels, mud balls to Introduction block the entrance, decoy nests that direct invaders away from the brood chamber, fighting swarms, and soldiers that The nest is the all-important centre of the bee’s universe, are skilled at immobilising attackers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis
    ANRV330-EN53-23 ARI 2 November 2007 18:40 Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis James B. Whitfield1 and Karl M. Kjer2 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61821; email: jwhitfi[email protected] 2Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008. 53:449–72 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on diversification, molecular evolution, Palaeoptera, Orthopteroidea, September 17, 2007 fossils The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract by UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS on 12/18/07. For personal use only. This article’s doi: Phylogenies of major groups of insects based on both morphological 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093304 and molecular data have sometimes been contentious, often lacking Copyright c 2008 by Annual Reviews. the data to distinguish between alternative views of relationships. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:449-472. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org All rights reserved This paucity of data is often due to real biological and historical 0066-4170/08/0107-0449$20.00 causes, such as shortness of time spans between divergences for evo- lution to occur and long time spans after divergences for subsequent evolutionary changes to obscure the earlier ones. Another reason for difficulty in resolving some of the relationships using molecu- lar data is the limited spectrum of genes so far developed for phy- logeny estimation. For this latter issue, there is cause for current optimism owing to rapid increases in our knowledge of comparative genomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Argentina
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2013, Article ID 926572, 14 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/926572 Review Article A Review of the Biology of Eucharitidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Argentina Javier Torréns CRILAR-CONICET, Entre R´ıos y Mendoza, 5301 Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina Correspondence should be addressed to Javier Torrens;´ [email protected] Received 3 March 2013; Revised 30 April 2013; Accepted 12 May 2013 Academic Editor: Jean-Paul Lachaud Copyright © 2013 Javier Torrens.´ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. All the members of Eucharitidae are parasitoid of ants. Argentina has 14 genera and 41 species, but little is known about their biology. Herein are provided new data for host associations (host ant and/or host plant) of Galearia latreillei, Kapala spp., Latina rugosa, Orasema aenea,andOrasema sp. A revision of the most relevant biological aspects of Dicoelothorax platycerus, Latina rugosa, Neolirata alta, N. daguerrei, Lophyrocera variabilis, Orasema argentina, O. salebrosa, O. simplex, O. susanae, O. worcesteri,andO. xanthopus is included. New records of K. sulcifacies, Lo. plagiata,andOb. semifumipennis in Argentina are presented. Galearia proseni is synonymized with G. latreillei. 1. Introduction 2. Materials and Methods Eucharitidae parasitize the immature stages of Formicidae Females were collected by sweep netting and provided twigs and are among the most diverse hymenopteran parasitoids with leaves, fruits, and flowers of different species of plants in of eusocial insects [1–8]. Females are oviparous and pro- 10 × 3.5 cm plastic tubes to monitor oviposition habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Natasha Fijn Sugarbag Dreaming: the Significance of Bees to Yolngu in Arnhem Land, Australia
    H U M a N I M A L I A 6:1 Natasha Fijn Sugarbag Dreaming: the significance of bees to Yolngu in Arnhem Land, Australia Introduction. We pile out of the dusty four-wheel drive troop carrier and begin walking in separate groups of two or three, bare feet crunching through the dry grass. The only other sounds are occasional resonant taps from an axe testing whether a trunk is hollow; or when the women periodically call to each other to keep within earshot amongst the scattered stands of stringybark trees. It is easy, open walking through country. The extended family group I came with care for the land by setting fire to the grass during the drier months, particularly at this time of year, sugarbag season. I observe while the women in their brightly coloured skirts with their young children or grandchildren look closely at the trunks of the trees and up into the canopy at the blue sky beyond, scanning for signs of the tiny black stingless bees. Today offers good conditions for finding honey. If the conditions are too cool or windy the bees tend to stay in their nest, not venturing out to forage. We hear a yell in the distance indicating that a nest has been found and walk to the small, scraggly-looking tree. The teenager, who located the bees, begins to chop down the tree to get at the nest inside. Children hold onto their jars and containers in keen anticipation of the rich, sticky honey within the tree. Once the women have opened up the nest, they do not only consume the liquid honey but collect everything with the beaten end of a stick: the wax, larvae, pollen and the odd entrapped stingless bee.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Sociobiology 64(3): 359-362 (September, 2017) DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1262 Sociobiology An international journal on social insects SHORT NOTE First Record of the Stingless Bee Lestrimelitta rufa (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in NE Brazil and its Cleptobiotic Behavior VM Mascena1, DS Nogueira2, CM Silva3, BM Freitas1 1 - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil 2 - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus-AM, Brazil 3 - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Crato-CE, Brazil Article History Abstract The aim of this study was to expand occurrence records of Edited by Lestrimelitta rufa (Friese, 1903) to the Brazilian Northeast and Evandro N. Silva, UEFS, Brazil Received 01 December 2016 to document the cleptobiotic behavior of this robber species in Initial acceptance 27 February 2017 colonies of Melipona quinquefasciata Lepeletier, 1836. Two attacks Final acceptance 01 May 2017 were carried out in a meliponary in the county of Barbalha (Ceará, Publication date 17 October 2017 Brazil), where pot and larval food were sacked. Even with direct confrontation between invading and inquiline bees, there was a Keywords Robber bee, Melipona, quinquefasciata, total loss of one of the attacked nests because robber workers ethology, inquiline bee. remained insistently in search of resources of these nests during the attacks. Corresponding author Valdenio Mendes Mascena Universidade Federal do Ceará Av. da Universidade, 2853 - Benfica CEP 60020-181 - Fortaleza-CE, Brasil. E-Mail: [email protected] The geographic distribution of the genus Lestrimelitta morphological characteristics, the bee cannot collect pollen Friese, 1903, includes the Neotropical region, with 21 species from flowers, assuming obligatory cleptobiotic behavior and and part of the Neartic region, with two species (Camargo & robbing other bees’ nests to keep its own (Roubik, 1989; Pedro, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Local Knowledge About Pollination And
    Science and Policy for People and Nature Indigenous and Local Knowledge about Pollination and Pollinators associated with Food Production Indigenous and Local Knowledge about Pollination Pollinators associated with Food Production ▶ Outcomes from the Global Dialogue Workshop 1–5 December 2014 • Panama ▶ Edited by P. Lyver, E. Perez, M. Carneiro da Cunha and M. Roué ▶ Organized by IPBES and the Task Force on Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems Science and Policy ▶ Support from USDA, Smithsonian Tropical for People and Nature Research Institute, FAO and UNESCO Indigenous and Local Knowledge about Pollination and Pollinators associated with Food Production Outcomes from the Global Dialogue Workshop ▶ Edited by: P. Lyver, E. Perez, M. Carneiro da Cunha and M. Roué ▶ Organized by the: Task Force on Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ▶ in collaboration with the: IPBES Expert Group for the Assessment on Pollination and Pollinators associated with Food Production ▶ with support from United States Department of Agriculture Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Food and Agriculture Organization United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization ▶ 1–5 December 2014 • Smithsonian Tropical Resource Institute • Panama City, Panama Science and Policy for People and Nature Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France Organized by the IPBES Task Force on Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems (ILK) – sub-group for the pollination assessment: Phil Lyver Edgar Perez Manuela Carneiro da Cunha Ro Hill Alfred Oteng-Yeboah Marie Roué Randy Thaman In collaboration with the following members of the IPBES Expert Group for the Pollination Assessment: Vera Imperatriz Fonseca (co-chair) Sara Jo Breslow Damayanti Buchori Maria del Coro Arizmendi Mary Gikungu Dino Martins With support from: D.
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID WARD ROUBIK -CURRICULUM VITAE- Personal Data
    DAVID WARD ROUBIK -CURRICULUM VITAE- Personal Data Birth Date: 3 October 1951 Birth Place: Schenectady, New York, USA Marital Status: married, four children Present Position: since 1979 —research entomologist, GS-15, Permanent Scientific Staff, STRI Present Address: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, APDO 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panama e-mail: [email protected] Education 1965-69: University High School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1968-69: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; advanced Spanish 1969-71: Macalester College, Saint Paul, Minnesota; Humanities 1972: University of Washington, Seattle; Liberal Arts 1973-75: Oregon State University, Corvallis; B.S. in Entomology 1975-79: University of Kansas, Lawrence; Ph.D. in Entomology Active Professional Memberships Kansas Entomological Society Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Language Competency Spanish, Portuguese, French, English Editing Responsibilities Editorial Board: Psyche, Insect Conservation and Diversity, Annals of Botany Committee Responsibilities Assembly of Delegates, Organization for Tropical Studies, Smithsonian Representative (1996- present) STRI Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (2005-2010) Education Responsibilities Adjunct Professor, Chinese Academy of Sciences, XTBG (2006-2008); Adjunct Professor (McGill University (2003-2006); Scientific Board, Silvolab, Guyane [European Union] (2000-2003). Academic Honors, Grants, Awards 1970: Academic Achievement Award Macalester College ($100) 1975: Honorable Mention, National Science Foundation Fellowship
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and External Morphology of Bees
    3?00( The Biology and External Morphology of Bees With a Synopsis of the Genera of Northwestern America Agricultural Experiment Station v" Oregon State University V Corvallis Northwestern America as interpreted for laxonomic synopses. AUTHORS: W. P. Stephen is a professor of entomology at Oregon State University, Corval- lis; and G. E. Bohart and P. F. Torchio are United States Department of Agriculture entomolo- gists stationed at Utah State University, Logan. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The research on which this bulletin is based was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants Nos. 3835 and 3657. Since this publication is largely a review and synthesis of published information, the authors are indebted primarily to a host of sci- entists who have recorded their observations of bees. In most cases, they are credited with specific observations and interpretations. However, information deemed to be common knowledge is pre- sented without reference as to source. For a number of items of unpublished information, the generosity of several co-workers is ac- knowledged. They include Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., Charles Osgood, Glenn Hackwell, Elbert Jay- cox, Siavosh Tirgari, and Gordon Hobbs. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Leland Chandler and Dr. Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., for reviewing the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions. Most of the drawings were prepared by Mrs. Thelwyn Koontz. The sources of many of the fig- ures are given at the end of the Literature Cited section on page 130. The cover drawing is by Virginia Taylor. The Biology and External Morphology of Bees ^ Published by the Agricultural Experiment Station and printed by the Department of Printing, Ore- gon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1969.
    [Show full text]