DOCSLIB.ORG

Ii Ciclo Anual De Conferencias Arqueológicas 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ii Ciclo Anual De Conferencias Arqueológicas 2019 See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342349278 Reflexiones en torno a las colecciones esqueléticas en Guatemala y su potencial de estudio. Article · June 2020 CITATIONS READS 0 84 1 author: Claudia María Quintanilla University of San Carlos of Guatemala 13 PUBLICATIONS 19 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Claudia María Quintanilla on 21 June 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE HISTORIA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTÓRICAS, ANTROPOLÓGICAS Y ARQUEOLÓGICAS II CICLOMEMORIA ANUAL DE CONFERENCIAS ARQUEOLÓGICAS 2019 COMISIÓN ORGANIZADORA Dr. Mario Alfredo Ubico Calderón II CICLO ANUAL Mtra. Luz Midilia Marroquín Franco Mtro. Luis AlbertoDE Romero CONFERENCIAS Rodríguez Mtro. Danilo Dardón Flores ARQUEOLÓGICAS 2019 Mtro. Jorge Cáceres Trujillo Comisión de moderadores Estudiantes: Pedro Herrera Furlán Aura Patricia Barrientos Marvin Vinicio García Editores Magdalena Guamuch Dr. Mario Alfredo Ubico Calderón Jacobo Castañeda Mtra. Luz Midilia Marroquín Franco Portada Fernando Véliz Mtro.Antiguo temploLuis de Alberto San Clemente, Romero Morazán, Rodríguezel Progreso, Guatemala Selvin Chiquín Estela de Piedras Negras, Petén Guatemala Claudia Galindo Livni Almira Tzunum Nueva Guatemala de la Asunción, marzo 2019 NUEVA GUATEMALA DE LA ASUNCIÓN 2019 UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE HISTORIA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTÓRICAS, ANTROPOLÓGICAS Y ARQUEOLÓGICAS II CICLO ANUAL DE CONFERENCIAS ARQUEOLÓGICAS 2019 COMISIÓN ORGANIZADORA Dr. Mario Alfredo Ubico Calderón Mtra. Luz Midilia Marroquín Franco Mtro. Luis Alberto Romero Rodríguez Mtro. Danilo Dardón Flores Mtro. Jorge Cáceres Trujillo Los abstracts fueron elaborados por: Alessandra García Pontaza y Julia Noriega Comisión de moderadores Estudiantes: Pedro Herrera Furlán Aura Patricia Barrientos Marvin Vinicio García Magdalena Guamuch Jacobo Castañeda Portada Fernando Véliz Antiguo templo de San Clemente, Morazán, el Progreso, Guatemala Selvin Chiquín Estela de Piedras Negras, Petén Guatemala Claudia Galindo Livni Almira Tzunum UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE HISTORIA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTÓRICAS, ANTROPOLÓGICAS Y ARQUEOLÓGICAS II CICLO ANUAL DE CONFERENCIAS ARQUEOLÓGICAS 2019 COMISIÓN EDITORIAL Dr. Mario Alfredo Ubico Calderón Mtra. Luz Midilia Marroquín Franco Mtro. Luis Alberto Romero Rodríguez LECTORES EXTERNOS Mtro. Jorge Cáceres Mtra. Patricia del Águila Mtro. Horacio Martínez Mtra. Rosaura Vásquez Mtra. Claudia Quintanilla Correccion y edición de estilo Lic. Mario Castañeda Nueva Guatemala de la Asunción, marzo 2019 AGRADECIMIENTOS ESPECIALES Consejo Directivo de la Escuela de Historia Consejo Académico del Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Antropológicas y arqueológicas (IIHAA). Área de Arqueología Escuela de Historia Dirección General de Investigación de la Universidad de San Carlos (DIGI) Casa Flavio Herrero Dra. Artemis Torres Mtro. Danilo Dardón Flores Mtro. Jorge Cáceres Dr. Edgar Gutiérrez Por su contribución y aporte en la realización del II Ciclo de Conferencias Arqueológicas 2019 Contenido Presentación Dra. Artemis Torres .......................................................................................................................... 1 Introducción .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Graduados de la licenciatura en Arqueología de la Escuela de Historia, USAC. Números, datos y género. Luz Midilia Marroquín Franco ................................................................................................................................. 6 “Puesta en valor”, sus alcances en la gestión pública del patrimonio arqueológico Mónica Pellecer Alecio ........ 26 ¿Para qué? Y ¿Para quién? El uso del patrimonio cultural Rosaura María Vásquez Pinto .................................... 31 Recordando a Vere Gordon Childe. Dr. Edgar S. G. Mendoza ............................................................................. 35 La arquitectura vernácula rural en los siglos XVIII al XIX, la adaptación de los sistemas constructivos en el departamento de Jalapa, Guatemala. Christopher S. Martínez Donado .............................................................. 45 Liberales y Arqueología (Patrimonio cultural) una afinidad decimonónica. Las concesiones de la investigación. Jorge E. Cáceres Trujillo ........................................................................................................................................ 65 Migraciones y territorio ocupado por los Rabinaleb: Una mirada desde la Arqueología y los textos indígenas. Horacio Martínez Paiz ............................................................................................................................................ 85 La tierra cruda en la Capital del Reino de Guatemala: Uso antiguo y vestigios actuales. Mario Alfredo Ubico Calderón ............................................................................................................................................................... 100 Historia y rescate arqueológico del antiguo templo de Santa Catalina Bobadilla, La Antigua Guatemala. Gabriela Luna……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...134 Evolución de los rituales de Ceibal durante el período Preclásico. Flory María Pinzón González ...................... 156 La Florida-Namaan: Estela 16 Liliana Padilla y Joanne Baron ............................................................................ 166 El décimo Bakꞌtun en las Tierras Bajas Mayas: la visión arqueológica del clásico terminal Dra. Laura Lucía Gámez ................................................................................................................................................................... 179 El Mirador, la conservación de su arquitectura monumental y arte adosado, a través de métodos multidisciplinarios Josué Leonardo Guzmán ...................................................................................................... 193 Etapas constructivas de un grupo habitacional del sitio arqueológico Vega del Cobán, Teculután, Zacapa, Guatemala. Suarlin Ramírez Córdova .................................................................................................................. 207 Investigaciones en grupos residenciales y de connotación doméstica: implicaciones y aportes vistos a través de los estudios en la región de Cancuén. Paola Torres y Carlos Fidel Tuyuc ........................................................... 222 El Palacio Real de Wakaꞌ: una descripción desde la arquitectura del poder. Griselda Pérez Robles y Juan Carlos Pérez ..................................................................................................................................................................... 236 Relación entre El Mulato y los sitios del Valle de Guatemala. Edgar H. Carpio Rezzio ..................................... 250 Rescatando Jorgia, un montículo preclásico localizado en Villa Canales, Guatemala. Ana Lucía Arroyave ..... 269 El salvamento arqueológico como alternativa de investigación: El caso de Santo Domingo Xenacoj y San Juan Sacatepéquez. Juddy Carrillo y Sandra Carrillo ................................................................................................... 289 Aplicación del sistema LiDAR en la prospección arqueológica: Un estudio de los alrededores del área protegida del sitio arqueológico Ceibal, Sayaxché, Petén. José Luis Ranchos Cruz ............................................................ 304 Reflexiones en torno a las colecciones esqueléticas en Guatemala y su potencial de estudio. Claudia Quintanilla .............................................................................................................................................................................. 320 Las tumbas abovedadas de la Cuenca Media del Río Motagua. Luis Alberto Romero Rodríguez. ..................... 331 Aportes al estudio cerámico de Tikal: investigaciones en la Acrópolis Norte. Silvia Alvarado Najarro ............. 355 Los cazadores-recolectores que pasaron al Continente Americano: Una visión desde el arte rupestre. Elsa Damaris Menéndez Bolaños ................................................................................................................................. 363 Los artículos incluidos en la presente memoria son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores II CICLO ANUAL DE CONFERENCIAS ARQUEOLÓGICAS 2019 Presentación Dra. Artemis Torres El II Ciclo de Conferencias Arqueológicas organizado y realizado por el Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Antropológicas y Arqueológicas conjuntamente con el Área de Arqueología de la Escuela de Historia, se llevó a cabo en la semana del 18 al 22 de febrero del año 2019 en la sede de la Casa Flavio Herrera de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Este importante evento reunió entre sus ponentes a aproximadamente cuarenta profesionales de la arqueología, en su gran mayoría, egresados de la Escuela de Historia que están ejerciendo su profesión en espacios culturales y académicos relevantes en la realidad nacional. Además, se contó con la presencia de asistentes tanto de la Escuela de Historia como de diversos estudiantes interesados en los temas que fueron expuestos, discutidos y analizados. Es de hacer notar que, si bien es el segundo esfuerzo
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yucatán, México
    1 Uxmal, Kabah, Sayil, and Labná http://academic.reed.edu/uxmal/ return to Annotated Bibliography Architecture, Restoration, and Imaging of the Maya Cities of UXMAL, KABAH, SAYIL, AND LABNÁ The Puuc Region, Yucatán, México Charles Rhyne Reed College Annotated Bibliography Yucatán This is not a general bibliography on the Yucatán. This section includes publications on the Yucatán that deal extensively with the Puuc Region. Because these often give attention to individual sites, some of these publications are listed also in the sections on Uxmal, Kabah, Sayil, or Labná. Most publications on larger topics, such as Maya art or architecture, are listed only in those sections of the subject matter bibliography. A Álvarez, María C. Textos coloniales del Libro de Chilam Balam de Chumayel y textos glificos del Códice Dresden. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Centro de Estudios Mayas, Book 10, 1972. Andrews, Anthony P. “El ‘guerrero’ de Loltún: comentario analítico”. Boletín de la Escuela de Ciencias Antropológicas de la Universidad de Yucatán. 48/49: 36-50, 1981. Andrews, Anthony P. “Late Postclassic Lowland Maya Archaeology”, Journal of World Prehistory, 7:1 (1993), 35- 69. 2 Andrews, Anthony P., E. Wyllys Andrews V, and Fernando Robles Castellanos “The Northern Maya Collapse and its Aftermath”. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archaeology, Philadelphia, 2000. Andrews, E. Wyllys, IV Archaeological Investigations on the Yucatan Peninsula. New Orleans: Tulane University, Middle American Research Institute (MARI), Pub. 31, 1975. Andrews, E. Wyllys, IV “Archaeology and Prehistory in the Northern Maya Lowlands: An Introduction”. Archaeology of Southern Mesoamerica: Part One, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • With the Protection of the Gods: an Interpretation of the Protector Figure in Classic Maya Iconography
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography Tiffany M. Lindley University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Lindley, Tiffany M., "With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2148. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2148 WITH THE PROTECTION OF THE GODS: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE PROTECTOR FIGURE IN CLASSIC MAYA ICONOGRAPHY by TIFFANY M. LINDLEY B.A. University of Alabama, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2012 © 2012 Tiffany M. Lindley ii ABSTRACT Iconography encapsulates the cultural knowledge of a civilization. The ancient Maya of Mesoamerica utilized iconography to express ideological beliefs, as well as political events and histories. An ideology heavily based on the presence of an Otherworld is visible in elaborate Maya iconography. Motifs and themes can be manipulated to convey different meanings based on context.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: a Step Toward Improved Interpretation
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 8 Number 1 Article 6 1-31-1999 A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation John E. Clark Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Clark, John E. (1999) "A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 8 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol8/iss1/6 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation Author(s) John E. Clark Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 8/1 (1999): 22–33, 77. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract Aided by creative techniques, Ajáx Moreno carefully prepared more accurate, detailed renderings of the Izapa monuments, including Stela 5, with its com- plex scenes of gods and other supernatural creatures, royalty, animals invested with mythic and value symbolism, and mortals. The author raises relevant questions about reconciling Jakeman’s view with the new drawing: Are there Old World connections? Can Izapa be viewed as a Book of Mormon city? Did the Nephites know of Lehi’s dream? Are there name glyphs on the stela? The scene, if it does not depict Lehi’s dream, fits clearly in Mesoamerican art in theme, style, technical execution, and meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • The PARI Journal Vol. XII, No. 3
    ThePARIJournal A quarterly publication of the Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute Volume XII, No. 3, Winter 2012 Excavations of Nakum Structure 15: Discoveryof Royal Burials and In This Issue: Accompanying Offerings JAROSŁAW ŹRAŁKA Excavations of Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University NakumStructure15: WIESŁAW KOSZKUL Discovery of Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University Royal Burials and BERNARD HERMES Accompanying Proyecto Arqueológico Nakum, Guatemala Offerings SIMON MARTIN by University of Pennsylvania Museum Jarosław Źrałka Introduction the Triangulo Project of the Guatemalan Wiesław Koszkul Institute of Anthropology and History Bernard Hermes Two royal burials along with many at- (IDAEH). As a result of this research, the and tendant offerings were recently found epicenter and periphery of the site have Simon Martin in a pyramid located in the Acropolis been studied in detail and many structures complex at the Maya site of Nakum. These excavated and subsequently restored PAGES 1-20 discoveries were made during research (Calderón et al. 2008; Hermes et al. 2005; conducted under the aegis of the Nakum Hermes and Źrałka 2008). In 2006, thanks Archaeological Project, which has been to permission granted from IDAEH, a excavating the site since 2006. Artefacts new archaeological project was started Joel Skidmore discovered in the burials and the pyramid Editor at Nakum (The Nakum Archaeological [email protected] significantly enrich our understanding of Project) directed by Wiesław Koszkul the history of Nakum and throw new light and Jarosław Źrałka from the Jagiellonian Marc Zender on its relationship with neighboring sites. University, Cracow, Poland. Recently our Associate Editor Nakum is one of the most important excavations have focused on investigating [email protected] Maya sites located in the northeastern two untouched pyramids located in the Peten, Guatemala, in the area of the Southern Sector of the site, in the area of The PARI Journal Triangulo Park (a “cultural triangle” com- the so-called Acropolis.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Maya? by Robert Sharer
    Who Were the Maya? BY ROBERT SHARER he ancient maya created one of the Belize, Honduras, and El Salvador until the Spanish Conquest. world’s most brilliant and successful The brutal subjugation of the Maya people by the Spanish ca. 1470 CE civilizations. But 500 years ago, after the extinguished a series of independent Maya states with roots The Kaqchikel Maya establish a new Spaniards “discovered” the Maya, many as far back as 1000 BCE. Over the following 2,500 years scores highland kingdom with a capital at Iximche. could not believe that Native Americans of Maya polities rose and fell, some larger and more powerful had developed cities, writing, art, and than others. Most of these kingdoms existed for hundreds of ca. 1185–1204 CE otherT hallmarks of civilization. Consequently, 16th century years; a few endured for a thousand years or more. K’atun 8 Ajaw Europeans readily accepted the myth that the Maya and other To understand and follow this long development, Maya Founding of the city of Mayapan. indigenous civilizations were transplanted to the Americas by civilization is divided into three periods: the Preclassic, the “lost” Old World migrations before 1492. Of course archaeol- Classic, and the Postclassic. The Preclassic includes the ori- ogy has found no evidence to suggest that Old World intru- gins and apogee of the first Maya kingdoms from about 1000 sions brought civilization to the Maya or to any other Pre- BCE to 250 CE. The Early Preclassic (ca. 2000–1000 BCE) Columbian society. In fact, the evidence clearly shows that pre-dates the rise of the first kingdoms, so the span that civilization evolved in the Americas due to the efforts of the began by ca.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distinctive Maya Architectural Format: the Lamanai Temple
    8 A Distinctive Maya Architectural Format: The Lamanai Temple . H. Stanley Loten Introduction At Lamanai, as at Tikal, the ancient Maya maintained and repeated the same distinctive temple form over a Towering pyramidal temples, arresting dynastic significantly long time span at different locations portraits, fantastic.mythological figures; they leap to within the site. This review outlines the Lamanai our eyes from the forest canopy, from incised stelae example and considers comparable patterns of and from sculptured mask panels. 1l1ese are the great variation in architectural forms of pyramid-temples at signature pieces of Maya artistic production. They other sites in the Maya area. cap the ruins that initially attracted archaeological attention, and they continue to draw world-class As a secondary theme I am concerned with the con­ tourism to the Maya area. A constant· stream of ceptual role played by the pyramid, and with the vacationers shuffles past these great works, now underlying reasons that impelled the Maya to include cleared and restored. But they are seen merely as such costly and time-consuming features as prominent curiosities touted to sell excursions from Caribbean parts oftheir major temples. It is generally taken more resorts. In ancient times, however, they were certainly or less for granted that Maya pyramids were employed not for holiday amusement; they .were central to the to raise the "temples" at their summits to a civic and political life of Maya communities. Over commanding position of height (see, for example, centuries the Maya invested an enormous amount of Stierlin 1968:96). This view of the structures is time, energy, skill and resources in their production, certainly correct, and the idea has obvious value; I and their functioning is generally acknowledged to suspect, however, that it may not be the whole story.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Is Lowland Maya Archaeology Headed?
    Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 3, No. L 1995 Where Is Lowland Maya Archaeology Headed? Joyce Marcus 1 This article isolates three important trends in Lowland Maya archaeology during the last decade: (1) increased use of the conjunctive approach, with renewed appreciation of context and provenience; (2) waning use of the label "unique" to describe the Maya; and (3) an effort to use the Lowland Maya as a case study in social evolution. KEY WORDS: Maya archaeology; conjunctive approach; direct historic approach. INTRODUCTION I have been asked to review the last decade of Lowland Maya ar- chaeology and discuss any major trends that can be discerned. The task presents numerous problems, not the least of which is the fact that one has little time to deliberate on data so newly produced. I also do not want to run the risk of extolling current research at the expense of that done by our predecessors. Finally, the volume of literature on Maya archaeology has been increasing so rapidly in recent years that one cannot hope to do more than cite a fraction of it. I have tried to compensate for this by in- cluding a 400-entry bibliography at the end of the review. At least three major trends can be seen in the last decade of Lowland Maya archaeology, and I organize my presentation around them. The first trend is a substantial increase in the integration of multiple lines of evi- dence-in effect, what Walter W. Taylor (t948) called "the conjunctive ap- proach" (Carmack and Weeks, 1981; Fash and Sharer, 1991, Marcus, 1983; Sabloff, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • 63.02-Ramzy-Barrois-En-PDF.Pdf
    Barrois, Ramzy R. 2003 Las esculturas asociadas al Juego de Pelota en las Tierras Altas y la Costa del Pacífico. En XVI Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2002 (editado por J.P. Laporte, B. Arroyo, H. Escobedo y H. Mejía), pp.728-742. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala. 63 LAS ESCULTURAS ASOCIADAS AL JUEGO DE PELOTA EN LAS TIERRAS ALTAS Y LA COSTA DEL PACÍFICO Ramzy R. Barrois Mesoamérica se define por un conjunto de características, entre ellas las canchas de Juego de Pelota. Encontramos manifestaciones de este rasgo cultural en todas las regiones que constituyen el área mesoamericana: Área Maya (Tierras Bajas y Altas), Costa del Pacífico, Golfo de México, Cuenca de México y en el Occidente. Podemos preguntarnos entonces ¿en qué medida la existencia del Juego de Pelota podría definir la “mesoamericanidad” de un sitio determinado? En 1981, Eric Taladoire publicó su tesis sobre el Juego de Pelota, que constituye el primer trabajo sobre este tipo de estructura en lo que se refiere a toda Mesoamérica (Taladoire 1981). En ese entonces, Taladoire define 12 tipos arquitectónicos distintos e intenta una clasificación de todos los terrenos conocidos hasta esa fecha. Este autor dedica un capítulo completo al análisis de las esculturas vinculadas con las canchas (estelas, anillos, etc), es decir, a los elementos arquitectónicos dispuestos en la cancha, en las cercanías o con una iconografía asociada al juego (cuando la escultura se encontró aislada). Estos tipos diferentes de esculturas no siempre aparecen en todos los terrenos. Los elementos en asociación (paneles y anillos), o las exclusiones (anillos y espigas), nos indican que muy probablemente, en el interior del área mesoamericana, había diferentes conjuntos de reglas de juego.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagine Language & Literacy Main Idea Printouts (The Maya
    The Maya Civilization: Yesterday and Today Written by Jamie Tyler Illustrated by Aaron Houston The Maya civilization began more than 4,000 years ago in Mexico and the northern part of Central America. The Maya people were one of the most advanced societies in the ancient Americas. Long before the Spanish explorers came to Central America, the Maya were building cities and achieving amazing things. One thing the Maya were known for was building huge stone pyramids. One Maya pyramid in Guatemala, called La Danta, is one of the largest pyramids in the world. It’s more than 20 stories high and nearly 2,000 feet wide! The Maya was also the only ancient society in ancient America that had a complete written language. Pieces of Maya writing have been found on buildings, pottery, and paper made from tree bark. After the Spanish explorers came to Central America, life for the Maya people changed. But the Maya people didn’t disappear. Millions of Maya people still live in Mexico and Central America today. Some Maya people still live in a way that’s similar to the ancient Maya. They speak Mayan languages and keep the traditions that have been passed on for centuries. Some Maya people weave cloth and grow food in ways that are a lot like the ancient Maya. Other people who have Maya ancestors speak Spanish and go to public schools. There are Maya people in all walks of life, including baseball players, musicians, and politicians. From ancient times to today, the Maya people continue to be an important part of our world culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Ruins of Tikal & Copan
    PREVIEWCOPY Introduction Note to customers previewing this guidebook If you are previewing this guidebook in advance of purchase, please check out our enhanced preview, which will give you a deeper look at this guidebook. Travel guidebooks for the ultra curious, Approach Guides reveal a destination’s essence by exploring a compelling aspect of its cultural heritage: art, architecture, history, food or wine. The Maya religious centers of Tikal and Copán are one of Mesoamerica’s cultural treasures, the re- mains of a great civilization that prospered for 2,000 years (peaking from 600-800 CE) and created some of the most impressive art and architecture in the New World. Still infused with their historical magic, they are yours to discover. What’s in this guidebook • Background. We start off by providing some critical background information — focusing on cosmology and the role of the dynastic ruler — that makes sense of the forms and symbols of the unique Maya aesthetic. • Tours of Tikal and Copán. Following our tradition of being the most valuable resource for culture-focused travelers, we then turn our attention to two of the most spectacular Maya cities: Guatemala’s Tikal and Honduras’ Copán. For each city, we start by introducing the dis- tinctive features of its art and architecture, isolating key features and concepts that you will see again and again as you make your way through the site. The tours walk you through the highlights, aided by high-resolution images and a discussion that ties it all together. • Bonus site: Quiriguá. As a special bonus, we also profile the smaller Maya site of Quiriguá, an ideal addition to your existing Tikal and/or Copán itinerary.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Iconográfico De La Escultura Arquitectónica De Mundo Perdido
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad de Alcalá EHSEA, N" 15 I Julio-Diciembre 1997, pp. 7-41 I.- ARTÍCULOS ANÁLISIS ICONOGRÁnCO DE LA ESCULTURA ARQUITECTÓNICA DE MUNDO PERDIDO, TIKAL: PERÍODOS PRECLÁSICO TARDÍO Y CLÁSICO TEMPRANO Luis T. Sanz Castro (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) RESUMEN: En este artículo se ofrece el primer análisis iconográfico sistemático de la esculmra arquitectónica hallada en Mundo Perdido, un área rimal situada en la gran ciudad maya de Tikal, Guatemala. En términos cronológicos, el estudio se limita a la esculmra producida entre los años 100 a.C. y 550 d.C. Puesto que el análisis presentado es eminentemente comparativo, se establecen paralelos con otras formas artísticas encontradas en Tikal y en otros lugares de las Tierras Bajas mayas. ABSTRACT: Excavations carried out at the Mundo Perdido área of the Maya city of Tikal, Guatemala, uncovered some interesting examples of architectural sculpmre dating from 100 B.C. to A.D. 550. Although already published in printed form, these sculptures were still awaiting an in-depth study in iconographic terms. This article thus represents the first systematic, comparative iconographic analysis of the representational imagery embodied in this sculptural genre; in such analysis, special attention is paid to other art forms and visual configuration found in Tikal and elsewhere in the Maya Lowlands. Este artículo tiene como objetivo fundamental el ofrecer un análisis iconográfico de la esculmra arquitectónica de Mundo Perdido, un espacio arquitectónico rimal que se encuentra en la gran ciudad maya de Tikal, Guatemala (Figura 1).
    [Show full text]