From the Editors' desk @ CONTENTS Dear Readers, TATVAVADA It is to be noted with dismay that in Sri Vidyamanya Sandesha 5 countries other than India, only the Advaita Yativaani 8 Darshana of Shankaracharya is widely Research Article 10 Volume : 2 Issue : 2 March-April 2002 known. More dismaying are the facts that Special Article 14 it alone is known there as the whole and Presidential Address 20 sole and, even in many Upanishad Section 22 P RACTICAL P HILOSOPHY parts of India, the level of our own peoples' being informed about Indian philosophies is Geeta Section 26 We come across two lines of thinking ; The also the same. What we must be and are Purana Section 28 much concerned about and worried of is that Sarvamula Section 30 Materialism, which recognises only the perceptable the only rational Darshana of Youth Section 33 mundane world and rejects all the imperceptable supra- Madhva remains in darkness for such people. Section 37 It's not that they do not want to know about Pavana Yatra 44 mundane as inconsequential. The other is spirituality, Dvaita Darshana. It's the lethargy of us Comment 47 concerned that keeps them deprived. Along which gives little or no credence to the philosophical with some other reasons one major reason Vaani 48 A Eespectful Homage 49 world and rejects it as illusion and lays great stress only is the language barrier. For international propoganda if English is the link, in the on 'Atman' and its uplift and emancipation. While the national level it is Hindi. Though lot remains Type setting : to be done in the English front this journal Poornaprajna Samshodhana naked materialism promotes and encourages greed, lust blessed by Poojya Sri Vishvesha Tirtha strives Mandiram, Bangalore-28. and lawlessness, the dry spirituality leads to fatalism to do it's bit. In the Hindi front also a Cover design by : remarkable beginning was done by installing Sri K. M. Sheshagiri and inaction. Acharya madhva strikes a golden mean a Swamiji in Prayaga region. Poojya Sri SUBSCRIPTION Vidyavallabha Tirtha more respectfully and between these two extreme and mutually contradictory popularly known as Prayaga Swamiji who Issue : Rs. 10-00 Yearly : Rs. 50-00 ideologies and thus presents a Practial Philosophy. got intiated to Sannyasa by the great sage Patron : Rs. 1000-00 of the century Sri Vidyamanya Tirtha, ABROAD H.H. SRI VISHVESHA TIRTHA SWAMIJI dedicated his silent unstinted services to the cause of propogating Madhva Darshana in Issue : $ 5/- Yearly : $ 30/- North. He had attained Haripada on (Outstation cheques must include the Editorial Board Advisory Board 10.12.01 It is a great loss to us and to Bank charges.) Chief Editor : Prof. K.T. Pandurangi Dr. V.R. Panchamukhi the community. ABMM pays most respectful Cheque/D.D./M.O. for subscription may Prof. D. Char be sent in favour of : Editors Prof. D.N. Shanubhag Pranamas and Homage to this Yati. All of Tatvavada (English), Prof. A. Haridasa Bhat, Sri K.V. Murthy Yerkadithaya us should put our efforts to fill the void The Secretary, A.B.M.M.Mandala, Dr.C.H. Srinivasa Murthy Sri K. Gopinath created and to widen the ways and means P.P. Vidyapeetha, Bangalore-28 Executive Editors Publisher to spread Acharya Madhva's Tattvavada to Sri U.B. Gururajacharya, Sri Vasanata Kumar Parigi all such dark areas without furhter loss of Tel : 080-6690068, 6694026 Pt. Tirumala Kulkarni, Secretary, E-mail : [email protected] Pt. Srinivasa Varakhedi A.B.M.M.Mandala, Bangalore-28 time. -Editors Web address : http://www.tatvavada.org Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 56 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

Sri Vidyamanya Sandesha : to all others). The word Â"·Pk" is used to denote all ≤"i|"E"s or NINE GEMS OF TATVAVADA living souls, who can be divided into those who have to go The last and lasting message of Sri Sri Vidyamanya Tirtha swamiji through destruction of the body (in transmigration like us) and those who have no such experience. All souls right up English translation : Sri N.A.P.S. Rao to and other have to experience loss of their (Contd. from the previous issue) bodies during Â"‡eÎ" (universal dissolution) and are thus A"ªÂ"·Pk"s. Here a question can be raised on the word Â"ª|"ª. The word Only Lakshmi does not have any destruction of her body at any time. She has a body whose essence is made of ˘"{E", is derived from Â"ª, Â"ª|"ª and Â"ª|"ß" – Superior, more superior È{E"El etc. She is called Â"·Pk", though she is feminine, as she and most superior. has said that he is Â"ª|"ª and not has the capacity of a Â"·Pk" (masculine gender). is Â"ª|"ß". A doubt can therefore arise whether there is someone superior to both A"ª and ÈA"ªÂ"·Pk"s. This is the essence of all else who is Â"ª|"ß" other than Krishna. But, this is not correct, the , all the shasthras and the entire Geetha. This has as actually both the words mean the same. Acharya Madhva been stated by Acharya Shankara also in his Bhashya : has given the meaning of the word Para as one who is never ëE" ÷iÒ˙"ew C"˙"{if <∫ ˆ"”|"{U"{C‰"{¨"f# C"ß"{C"iE" ≈òÒ# <÷ÒE|"· C"ß"C|"U"{C‰"{¨"f‚"í afflicted by sorrow (either in the past or in future). Only . Lakshmi and Narayana are qualified to be called as Para, as This means that the statement that Narayana is Â"·Pk"{iy"ß" is not neither of them is ever affected by sorrow. As there are only just the purport of the entire Geetha, but is also the essence two such persons, who can be compared, the comparitive word of all the Shasthras. In the shloka – ëÎ"{i e{i÷Ò‰"Î"ß"{<˙"UÎ" <µ"„"<|"f Â"ª|"ª also indicates Â"ª|"ß". Krishna has said in the 15th chapter È˙Î"Î"# —fX"ª#í which occurs here – the use of the word Iswara of Geetha: who is immanent every where and controls and supports every ëü{<˙"ß"{ Â"·Pk"{ e{i÷iÒ A"ª‚"{A"ª Ã˙" ≤" $ thing can give a possible meaning that Pÿ is being referred A"ª# C"˙"{f<Ó" „"±|"{C¨"{i&A"ª ≈≤Î"|"i $$ to, as he is commonly known as —fX"ª. To clarify this, Acharya ≈y"ß"# Â"·Pk"C|˙"EÎ"# Â"ªß"{|ß"i|Î"·l{¸|"# $ Shankara writes – ë—fX"ª# —fU"E"U"”e{i E"{ª{Î"Ó"#í or —fX"ª means Î"{i e{i÷Ò‰"Î"ß"{<˙"UÎ" <µ"„"|Î"f˙Î"Î" —fX"ª# $$ Narayana who controls every one else and He is not Pÿ. Thus Î"Cß"{|A"ªß"|"”|"{i&∫ß"A"ª{l<Â" ≤"{iy"ß"# $ the doubt that Acharya Shankara may hold Pÿ as sarvotthama È|"{i&ìCß" e{i÷iÒ ˙"ili ≤" Â"‡<¨"|"# Â"·Pk"{iy"ß"# $$ is also removed. He has clearly held that Narayana is Î"{i ß"{ß"i˙"ß"C"ßß"±c>{i ¬"{E"{<|" Â"·Pk"{iy"ß"ß"Ø $ purushotthama according to the shasthras and this fact is the C" C"˙"f<˙"lØ „"¬"<|" ß"{w C"˙"f„"{˙"iE" „"{ª|" $$ essence of all the shasthras. —<|" ˆ"·fi|"ß"w U"{C‰"<ß"lsß"·òwÒ ß"Î"{&E"x" $ Acharya Madhva has also established by valid Â"‡ß"{Ó"s that Ã|"lØ µ"·lØ‹˙"{ µ"·<’ß"{E"Ø CÎ"{|"Ø ÷DÒ|"÷DÒ|Î"‚" „"{ª|" $$í Narayana is C"˙"{ify"ß". This superiority is not ˙Î"{˙"∫{´ª÷Ò (as held These shlokas constitute the essence of Bhagavadgeetha. by Acharya Shankara) but is Â"{ªß"{<¨"f÷Ò. (˙Î"{˙"∫{´ª÷ means that Krishna is explaining that He is Â"·Pk"{iy"ß" or C"˙"{ify"ß" (superior it is essentially unreal but has a kind of real existence in the Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 78 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

world, which will get sublated eventually, while Â"{ªß"{<¨"f÷Ò means Yativaani : that it is absolutely real and will never get sublated.) Messages from Sri Vibudhesha Tirtha Acharya also says that Narayana is C"˙"{ify"ß", but also says that in Mukthi, the liberated souls and Narayana have (Sri Vibudhesha Tirtha Swamiji of Sri Admaru , was equal bliss. This parama samya (complete equivalence) of bliss contradicts the C"˙"{ify"ß"|˙" of Narayana which should be there inaugurating the cultural programmes for the next two years of Sri at all times. Only Acharya Madhva has categorically stated Krishna Pooja Paryaya period of Sri Vidyadheesha Tirtha of Sri Palimaru that Narayana is C"˙"{ify"ß". Matha, Udupi in the evening on 18.1.2002 at the Rajangana Sabhabhavana Rudra and Brahma etc. give boons to l |Î"{s and ª{A"C"s of of Udupi Sri Krishna Matha. The following are the excerpts from his becoming immortal (after they seek such boons with severe inaugural speech.) penance). Narayana in His incarnations on the earth rejects Experience the U"{À{¨"f : these boons and kills such l |Î"{s. It is, therefore, clear that Narayana is superior to Rudra and Brahma, as He can overlook Acharya Madhva stresses the importance of Anubhava (the their boons. It is thus concluded that Narayana is neither equal self experience) by calling it as the most valid Pramana. He to or identical with Rudra and Brahma, but is sarvotthama. puts it as ëU"{À{¨"fÎ"·Í|"{E"·„"˙"w Â"‡ß"{Ó"ß"Ø ≈y"ß"w ß"|"ß"Ø $í Study the U"{À We have explained briefly the subject of the Sarvotthamathva and understand the U"{À{¨"f. Don't stop at that. Make the U"{À{¨"f of Narayana (by the valid pramanas of Vedas, Mahabharatha, a part of your experience which then becomes a Pramana for Geetha and yukthi.) (To be contd..) you in all your further Sadhana-path. It percolates as your inner voice (ÈE|"˙"{fÓ"”) which guides your Sadhana. Give an j{E", ¬"Â" Even acts like and 's worship that are ear to such an Antarvani in your decisions. done without giving up the sense of 'I' and 'Mine' are Study of U"{À imports clarity to the mind. Clarity of mind not acceptable to God ; the fruits thereof go only to is very essential during our 'Sadhana' for perceiving the things l{E"˙"{s. These acts are like the woodapple eaten by the as they are. Clear mirror reflects the object as it is. The clear elephant ; it remains the form but has no substance. experience of Shastrartha is similar to flawless and undistorted * * * * reflection. Studying and imparting Vedas, Shastras, , giv- ing up all forbidden acts and performing all prescribed Be sincere to be fearless : ones, giving up food and controlling the breath, are of no One should be fearless in life. In order to cultivate such use if one does not overcome desire and anger and give an undauntedness one shouldn't be treacherous and a cheat. up the feeling of 'I' and 'Mine'. One who is a cheat fears. To be sincere is the greatest of the good qualities to acquire in life. Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 910 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

Udupi Sri Krishna, not a mere idol : Research Article : Sri Madhva brought in È|"”

it by the grace of God. Each individual soul is atomic, not bliss of in the presence of the Lord. Ramanuja does all-pervading. not say that the soul is the image of Brahman, though he Also every soul is an image (Pratibimba) of Sri Hari. Such admits that it is in every way under the control of Brahman a statement is meant to convey the idea that the soul resembles and has attributes similar to those of Brahman. The souls are God and in all states is dependent on Hari. It is not meant infinite in number and are all alike, there being no gradation that the existence of the Jiva is due to a material Upaadhi in them as is in the case of the system of Madhva. in which God is reflected, as is the case when the face of In the experience 'I know myself', the soul manifests its a person is reflected in a mirror. For the Jiva there is no Upaadhi being to itself without the aid of any other instrument. This other than the essence of the Jiva itself which is of the nature inwardness of self-consciousness is known as Pratyaktvam in of intelligence, bliss and self-consciousness. The being of the Ramanuja's philosophy. soul depends on the Supreme Being who controls its knowledge THE CONCEPT OF THE SOUL IN THE PHILOSOPHY and all its activity. Since God is eternal, all Jivas are eternal. OF NIMBAARKA: In the state of bondage (Samsaara) the soul does not shine in its true nature due to Ajnaana (primal nescience) and Generally there is agreement between the views of Nimbaartka Kaamyakarma. Kaamyakrma is performed with the and Ramanuja in regard to the nature of soul. The soul is object of obtaining some good other than release from bondage. atomic, self-conscious and has personality. It is an agent and All souls are not of equal excellence; there is a gradation in an enjoyer. The number of souls is infinite and in all states them with the four-faced Brahma occupying the highest place. the soul is dependent on the Lord. One important difference between Ramanuja and Nimbaarka is that in the system of RAMANUJA'S IDEA OF THE SOUL: the latter no special emphasis is laid on the soul being the Generally the view of Ramanuja agrees with the view of body of the Supreme Soul. The following Shloka embodies Madhva. The soul is self-conscious, atomic and has personality. Nimbaarka's concept of the soul: Paramaatman resides in each soul as Antaryaamin, the inner ˘"{E"C˙"¡ÒÂ"w ≤" ∫ªiª‹"”E"w U"ª”ªC"wÎ"{iˆ"<˙"Î"{iˆ"Î"{iˆÎ"ß"Ø $ ruler. Each soul is the body of the inner Supreme Soul. In ÈÓ"·w <∫ ¬"”˙"w Â"‡<|"li∫<„"Ô"w ˘"{|"D|˙"˙"E|"w Î"lE"E|"ß"{∫s# $$ Ramanuja's philosophy the soul being the body of Ishvara receives particular emphasis. Indeed it would be no overstatement The following is a free rendering of the Shloka: to say that this concept is the pivot of Vishishtaadvaita Vedanta. The Jiva is of the essence of knowledge and is dependent Though the soul is other than Brahman, it cannot exist apart on Hari, the Supreme Being. He has the fitness to be connected from Him. The Jiva in addition being self concious has the with a material body and to be separated from it. He is atomic agency and is the enjoyer of happiness and sorrow. Personality and differenct in different bodies. He is a knower and not and self-concsiousness persist in the stake of Mukti, a state in mere subject-object-less knowledge. There are infinite number which the soul shines in its own pure state and enjoys the of Jivas. Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 13 14 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

SHANKARA'S CONCEPT OF THE JIVA: Special Article : Jiva is the reflection of Brahman in Avidya. Agency, Radhakrishnan's Exposition of enjoyership and being a knower are all characteristics of Ahankaara, a modification of Avidya. These qualities are superimposed on the image of Brahman in Avidya. The -Prof. K.T. Pandurangi Upa-Kulapati, Poornaprajna Vidyapeetha, experience of personality in the form 'I' or 'I am' or 'I exist' Bangalore really belongs to Ahankaara and in the last analysis belongs Radhakrishnan first discuses the theory of knowledge of to the world of illusion. The 'I'-cognition is the result of the Dvaita Vedanta. He mentions that Dvaita accepts three sources union (so to speak) of pure intelligence and Ahankaara. The of knowledge, i.e., perception, inference and scriptural testimony. entire body of experience which constitutes Samsaara really In the case of the third, the special point, viz., the whole belongs to this 'I'. In the state of release there remains only Veda consisting of Samhita, Braahmana and Upanishad being pure intelligence and 'I'-ness disappears completely. This pure Chit or intelligence has no self-consciousness and hence no taken as the source of spiritual knowledge, instead of only personality. It is pure knowledge without the subject or the Upanishad being taken so, is noted. Karmakaanda portion also objcet. It is not a knowing agent and hence cannot be called being treated as yielding spiritual content in addition to a knower much less an agent in any act and is no enjoyer. ritualistic content, is a special approach of Dvaita. This is As the Jiva is identical with the all-pervaiding Brahman it is mentioned in this exposition. It may be added that even within omnipresent and not atomic. What is atomic is the mind and the distinction of tattvaavedaka and atattvaavedaka, the atomicity of the mind is superimposed on the Brahman i.e., those passages that give finally valid knowledge and those reflected in Avidya. It is clear from this description that that yield some tentative knowledge that is to be rejected later, Shankara's conception of the Jiva is entirely different from that is not made in Dvaita. This grouping is made in Advaita to of Madhva, Ramanuja or Nimbaarka. resolve the conflict between abheda Shrutis and bheda Shrutis. However, in Dvaita abheda Shrutis are interpreted suitably and PRABHAAKARA'S CONCEPT OF THE JIVA: the conflict is resolved so as to affirm bheda as the final In the view of Prabhaakara cognition is self-luminous and purport. Six guidelines of suitably interpreting abheda Shrutis the Aatman or soul is revealed as the locus of every cognition. (to resolve the conflict with bheda Shrutis) are mentioned. When there is no cognition the soul does not show itself. In sound sleep, the existence of the soul is not revealed as, Sri Madhva's acceptance of the intrinsic validity of according to him, there is no cognition of any sort in that apprehension is stated and his opposition to all theories that state. In the state of release the soul is no better than an regard knowledge as mere appearance is pointed out. insentient piece of stone. It exists as a bare existence. The Sri Madhva's insistance that 'Every case of illusion implies number of souls is infinite and each soul is all-pervaiding. two positive entities, a given thing and a suggested object; (To be contd...) therefore, the notion of un-reality of the world means that Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 15 16 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

there is something real which we mistake for something else. that the Lord is dependent on Karma, for, as Sri Madhva says, It does not mean that there is nothing real at all', is recorded, 'the very existence of Karma and other things depend on the and Sri Madhva's opposition to the illusory nature of the world Lord'. is summed up. The above observations of Radhakrishnan on the concept The Dvaita position in respect of knowledge, viz. 'there can of God in Dvaita give us all important features of that concept be no knowledge without a knower and a known' is elucidated. and help us to understand the same in contrast with the concept 'The distincion of things is affirmed with the remark, 'If we of Brahman in Advaita and that of God in other systems. do not admit distinctions of things, we cannot account for Discussing the nature of individual souls according to the distinctions of ideas'. Dvaita, he observes: 'The distinction between Brahman and The Dvaita way of stating categories as independent and Jiva is real. Though absolutely dependent on Brahman, the dependent, positive and negative, chetana and achetana and so Jivas are essentially active agents and have responsibilites to on, is then briefly stated. bear. Jiva is said to be of atomic size. It pervades the body Describing concept of God in Dvaita, Radhakrishnan on account of its quality of intelligence. The soul is by nature observes: 'Independent reality is Brahman, the absolute creator blissful, though it is subject to suffering, on account of its of the universe. We can know his nature... so his nature is connection with material bodies due to its past Karma. The not indefinable. When the supreme is said to be indefinable, qualities like bliss become manifest at the time of release. No all that is meant is that a complete knowledge of him is two Jivas are alike in character. Each has its own worth and difficult to acquire... Though the supreme being and his place in the scheme of existence. The souls are of three kinds: 1. Eternally free (Nityamukta, i.e., Lakshmi, 2. Those who qualities are identical, they can be spoken of in different terms. have freed themselves from Samsaara (Mukta, i.e., Devas, The famous passage that 'Brahman is one only without a , fathers, etc.), 3. The bound (Baddha). The last class second' (Ekam Evaadvitiyam Brahma) means that Brhman is includes both those who are eligible for release (muktiyogya) unsurpassed in excellence and without an equal. The attributes and those who are not. These latter are- either those intended of God are absolute in their character and so do not limit for hell or those who are bound to the circuit of Samsaara Him. Brahman possesses every kind of perfection. He is said for all times. The three-fold classification is based on the three to direct by His will the world and all that is in it, as an Gunas. The Saattvika soul goes to heaven, the Raajasa revolves absolute ruler. He is transcendent to the world as well as in Samsaara, while the Taamasa falls into hell. A gradation immanent, since He is the inner ruler of all souls. God rules dependent on distinctions of souls is worked out. In celestial the souls and matter, though He does not create them from hierarchy, Brahma and Vaayu occupy the most prominent nothing or reduce them to nothing. He is the efficient but places. Vaayu is the mediator betwen God and the souls. He not the material cause of the universe. God's activity is the helps the souls to gain saving knowledge and obtain release'. rusult of His over-flowing perfection. Simply because God takes This sums up the salient features of the concept of Jiva in into account the Karma of the individuals, it cannot be said Dvaita. Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 17 18 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

'The material products originate from the primary matter, negative being.' Prakrti, and return to incourse of time. God moulds forms 'A sound moral life is a preliminary, requisite for salvation. out of Prakrti, which is the material cause and in which exists The moral rules are to be obeyed obligations fulfilled without Himself in various forms. Before we get from the unmanifested any desire or claim for fruit. A virtuous life helps us to win Prakrti to the well-developed forms of creation, we have twenty- insight into truth. Sri Madhva allows all who can understand four transitional products of creation which are Mahat, it the right to study the Vedanta, or the act of Ahankaara etc. absorbing oneself as often and as intensly as possible in the 'Avidya is a form of Prakrti of which there are two kinds, glory of God, is advised. In the act of meditation the soul Jivaachaadika, that which obscures the spiritual powers of the can, by divine grace, arrive at a direct intuitive realisation of Jiva, and Paramaacchaadika, that which screens off the Supreme God (Aparokshajnaana)'. from the Jiva's view. Those two forms of Avidya are positive 'Release, according to Dvaita, consists in restoration to the principles formed out of the substance of Prakrti. pure spiritual existence (C˙"¡ÒÂ"iÓ" ˙Î"˙"ìC¨"<|"#) after casting off the 'Sri Madhvacharya rejects all attempts to reduce the world unessential forms (ÈEÎ"¨"{¡ÒÂ"ß"Ø). It is the fellowship with God, of souls, and nature to a mere illusion or an emanation of and not identification with him'. God. The individual soul is dependent on God. Even Lakshmi, 'In the state of release, we have absence of pain as well the consort of , is dependent on God. She is the as the presence of positive enjoyment. But the soul is not presiding deity over Prakrti which is the material cause of the capable of rising into equality with God'. world'. The above brief account of Radhakrishnan's exposition of 'The text ''Tat tvam asi'' (That art thou), Sri Madhva Dvaita Vedanta makes it clear that he has a lucid account of argues, does not declare any identity between God and the the theory of knowledge, concepts of God, individual souls, soul. It only states that the soul has for its existence qualities and matter in a compact way and mentioned the salient similar to those of God. He sometimes reads the passage in features of these concepts according to Dvaita. He has also a different way, viz., 'Sa aatma atat tvam asi' (that aatman briefly discussed the ethics, religion and the final goal of thou art not). Sri Madhva uses the etymological meanings of spiritual attainment, i.e., . Aatman and Brahman to explain away the passages which identify the individual and the universal self. Now, we may turn to his critical reflections on this system. He has made the following observations by way of his criticism. 'The supremacy of God introduces order and unity into the universe, in spite of ultimate differences. Through the 1. The fact of knowledge leads us to an organic conception category of Vishesha which distinguishes a quality from a of the world, but does not justify the division of the world substance, etc., the one and many are brought into relation. into God, souls and objects externally related to one another. Vishesha or particularity is numerically infinite, since it abides 2. If God creates, if the beginning of the world-process is in eternal and non-eternal things and belongs to positive and the result of the desire of the divine self, we may be able Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 19 20 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

to account for creation. But the difficulty remains that whoever Presidential address* : feels a want or has a desire is imperfect and limited. God, Madhva's Philosophy of life and social welfare on such a view, cannot be regarded as the supreme perfection. -Dr. V. R. Panchamukhi 3. The nature of the dependence of the world on God is Chancellor, not clearly brought out. Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, (From previous issue) 4. If Brahman is co-eternal with the world, what is the Four Purusharthas : relation between the two? If is also a co-eternal relation, is the supreme spirit bound to objects other than itself? We The second pillar of Madhva's philosophy of life is to be cannot say that it is the nature of the supreme spirit to stand found in the practical interpretation of the four Purusharthas viz. , , and Moksha, for our everyday life. related to the individual souls, since the former does not Madhva defines, as stated earlier, Dharma as follows : contain the reason for the latter's existence. C˙"C˙"<˙"<∫|"˙"DyÎ"{ „"Í|Î"{ „"ˆ"˙"lª{‹"{E"ß"i˙" Â"ªß"{i ‹"ß"f# $ 5. If the souls and matter depend on the ultimate Brahman, |"<üP’# C"˙"{if&ÂÎ"‹"ß"f# $ they cannot be regarded as substance. In the highest sense, the term 'substance' can be predicated only of a re completa, When once there was intense debate among the Pandavas that which is complete in itself, determined by itself and as to which Purushartha is superior to the others. Bhimasena is supposed to have propounded that Kama is the superior- capable of being explained entirely from itself. Sri Madhva most Purushartha. In the ordinary parlance, Kama is wrongly recognises that such a reality is possessed only by the supreme interpreted to mean either consumption-desire or sexual desire. spirit. But what Bhimasena meant was that urge to achieve something 6. The theory of election is fraught with great danger to with the desire of realising „"ˆ"˙"|Â"‡C"{l, is the most laudable ethical life. The predestinarian scheme of thought puts an Purushartha. What a profound interpretation of Kama, in a excessive strain on the other parts of Sri Madhva's theology. manner relevant for our everyday life. Bhimasena has also The moral character of God is much compromised, and the emphasised the importance of self-efforts for acquiring material qualities of divine justice and divine love are emptied of all prosperity as a symbol of benevolence of the Lord. meaning and value. Individual effort loses its point, since Â"‡Î"œ"ß"i÷Òß"ˆ"‡|"{i <˙"‹"{Î" „"±<|"ß"{Â"n·ß"# $ whether one believes oneself to be the elect or the non-elect, The interpretation of Moksha is also interesting. one is bound to lapse into indifferentism and apathy. ß"·<Í|"<∫f|˙"{&EÎ"¨"{¡ÒÂ"w C˙"¡ÒÂ"iÓ" ˙Î"˙"

Madhva's pronouncement that 'Exists' in every Upanishad Section : object as its commander,

treatise. One- the Nishats (

To reside at the crest of Bhagavat Prajna (awareness of Geeta Section : Bhagavan) is Upavasa. Jnani is also bound to perform Karma To remain in the vicinity of the Bhagavan by heart and Prof. A. Haridas Bhat mind is Upavasa. Poornaprajna Vidyapeetha, Bangalore In order to facilitate the mind and heart to elevate to such a summit point, resorting to reducing the burden on the (Contd. from Previous issue) stomach and keeping away from taking food are also named E" ˙" ‹"ß"”f E" ≤"{‹"ß"”f E" ≤" ˙" <∫ U"·„"{U"·„"” $ Upavasa. If the stomach is full the mind becomes (idle). If Î"# CÎ"{li÷Ò{Î"E"i e”E"# |"±kÓ"”w <÷Ò<Å"l<≤"E|"Î"E"Ø $$ the mind has to be full stomach has to be empty. 'The µ"‡h"˘"{E"” would remain quiet leaving aside all prescribed Thus goes the vivid and detailed narration of the word and prohibited activities'. By this, it looks as if he has no 'Upa'. binding on any activities. U"{䪄"{kÎ" pronounces that this is the One more etymology is also there. Upa is also an abridged implied meaning of the above as acceptable even to Geeta and form of the word 'Upahvara'. ë≈Â"àªí means solitude; or secret quotes the following stranza of Geeta in support. ëC"˙"f‹"ß"{fE"Ø domain. Â"´ª|Î"¬Î" ß"{ß"i÷wÒ U"ªÓ"w ˙"‡¬" .... $ (18.66). Upanishad is that secret science which requires to be But one fact explained in the portion of this ÈE"·ˆ"”|"{b{i÷Ò,- persued sitting in solitude. It has an extremely mystical, hidden ëÎ"# CÎ"{li÷Ò{Î"E"i e”E"#í has been onverlooked in arriving at this. Only message of the Veda; a message so valid and rich that it has the µ"‡h"˘"{E"” who is grossly immersed in the meditation of µ"‡h" to be preserved very carefully. (To be contd...) has no binding of the 'Karma'. This means- when a µ"‡h"˘"{E"” is in ÈC"ßÂ"‡˘"{|"C"ß"{<‹" (a mental status wherein he is in total detachment from the external world) he is not bound by the

meaning what Shankara put forward. It is irrational if Krishna, Purana Section : who wants to invigorate to perform his duties, advices Who is expounded in Gayatri ? him to renounce the Karma. What Krishna means by ÷Òß"f|Î"{ˆ" is only the detachment from the result of Karma, (÷Òß"f∂Òe|Î"{ˆ"). Source : Sri Vishvesha Tirtha Swamiji -Madhava Pandurangi Poornaprajna Vidyapeetha, This is what is further consolidated by Krishna in Geeta by Bangalore-28 putting so clearly that ëÈ{∫s# ÷Òß"f∂Òe|Î"{ˆ"w ÷Òß"f|Î"{ˆ"w ß"E"”

English translation by Sri U.B. Gururajacharya. of that desire. Some say that Gayatri is for praying the Sun God. Others say that Gayatri is teaching us about a Goddess called by that EACH ONE PLEASE ENROLL SOME name. We request our readers to please enroll some subscribers Actually, Gayatri Mantra is neither intently illustrating Sun to Tatvavada. Jnanadana (Gift of knowledge) is supreme of all God nor Goddess Gayatri. It expounds about the Supreme Danas (gifts) because it brings light and thus life to our mundane living. (All that done with knowledge, a mixture of Jnanayoga and Narayana who is in Sooryamandala as Antaryami. Karmayoga, lifts us towards God). Sooryamandala is the light for all other lights. Soorya gives You can also gift Subsription Bonds to your near and dear life to everything and hence it is the cause for all activities ones on Birth-day, Upanayanam, Marriage, New year day and any of the world. The verse ëÈ{ª{iˆÎ"w „"{C÷Òª{|"Øí tells us this. other occasion. You can get these bonds either by Post or in per- son from Tatvavada office or Book selling section of Poornaprajna But, Lord Narayana who is Antaryami is the source of power Vidyapeetha. even to Soorya. So, we must pray Narayana who is the source and master of Soorya, with Gayatri Mantra. CORRIGENDUM Daily, with folded hands and head bowed down, beg not In the last issue (Jan.-Feb. 02) in page 43, under Guru the material happiness. We must meditate and pray, Narayana Parampara of Palimaru Matha one of the eight name was the deity of deities visualising Him as squatting in by mistake left over. It may be added as "Sri Puttige Matha - Sri Sooryamandala. "Give us the light of knowledge and wisdom Tirtha" (as 4th Matha). and an eternal devotion in you". And the Moola Yati's name of Adamaru Matha may be read We need two kinds of lights. One is external and another as "'. is internal. We need external light for our daily material Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 29 30 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

activities. For this also we need to pray Lord Sun. Sarvamula Section : Upanishat Prasthaana Internal light is essential for uninterrupted Saadhana during our life time. Pt. K. Shankaranarayana Adiga Body grows with external light. But soul grows with only Poornaprjna Vidyapeetha, Bangalore-28 the internal light only, that is, the knowledge. For the light (Tattvavada English Journal is presenting to its readers articles on this of knowledge we must pray the Supreme Narayana who is the Sarvamula. Initially, broad introductory articles covering classified branches light of all. of Sarvamula works are intended to be offered. Subsequently, sufficient Gayatri contains this meaning of prayer i.e. "Give us the details of each of such branchs will be presented. light of knowledge". Gayatri is for making us eligible for God We now publish a brief account of Acharya Madhva's Upanishad realisation. It leads us to ultimate salvation. It is essence from Prasthana branch of Sarvamula.) the Veda. The Bhagavata is an elaboration of what Gayatri The second among the Prasthana Traya is the cluster of means and expounds. ten Upanishads (≈Â"{El{iˆÎ"„"{kÎ" the ˘"{E" atained by deserving person Poornaprajna Vidyapeetha, as per his/her merit is also Upanishad, ëC˙"Î"{iˆÎ"w |"· Â"´ª˘"{E"w Katriguppa Main Road, Bangalore-560 028 Î"y"CÎ"{iÂ"

È<„"ß"{{¨"f

Youth Section : one is the Sankalpa (definitive wishes-such as 'Do', 'Want', <‹"Î"{i Î"{i E"# Â"‡≤"{ilÎ"{|"Ø 'Here', 'Now', 'Thus') and the second is Vikalpa (negative wishes- such as 'Do not do', 'Do not want', 'Not here (there)', -Sri U. B. Gururajacharya 'Not now (after)', 'Not like this'). (Broadly, this section is dedicated to the youth. This may carry articles on Antahkarana or mind is that compartment of sensual train spiritual subjects which are relevetnt and pallatable to them written either by wherein only such confused dualities would enter and show a youth or by any other for the youth, not necessarily written by youth. up their faces. It would never be albe to come to affirmative Contributions by youths or even by others on above lines for this section are conculsion by itself. So as to be conclusively affirmative, we invited. -Ed.) take the help of intellectual faculty (µ"·<’). The Buddhi arrives (Contd. from previous issue.) at its own conclusive decision after weighing out the dualities But a question may be asked as to why at all motivation (the Sankalpa and Vikalpa). Even at this juncture of deciding from anybody is required? about the choice of the one out of two cross roads we through ß"E" Ã˙" ß"E"·kÎ"{Ó"{w ÷Ò{ªÓ"w ß"E‹"ß"{iA"Î"{i# $ our Buddhi should not tumble down or totter making a tragic end. By the time we realise we had erred time would have The adage declares that the mind can put us into trouble; elapsed for any correction. 'What if, we would have had learnt and/or it may also relieve us from the trouble. Normally each by experiences of failures or successes!'. But no guarantee is one of us have a desire not to get entangled with any trouble. there such experiences would protect us from wrong decisions. We usually keep a wrong notion that we are in right direction. We do wish and expect our Buddhi should behave and act Unknowingly on unaware, we get entangled with many in the right manner at the right time at the right place. unwanted situations. Of course, many of us may realise that we ourselves and our own mind and intellect are responsible What is this righteousness? Such righteousness or otherwise for such situations. And we struggle to come out of situations. of the Buddhi is judged by the end and not by the tentative We are cought up with. We may sometimes succeed in this result. Whatever resolution that the Buddhi takes and the ways effort and sometimg we may not. Oversmartness and methods and means we go about our activities after such resolution of such efforts would fail us. Then also we would blame our should contribute for the good of us, our dependents and own mind and sense for the failure. totally of the society which we live in. This basic expectation and purpose are intended in our prayer for mind-motivation. In order to not to get entrapped in dilemma in case of entrapment to come out of such situation of dilemma we got Mind not motivated in time causes the repentence of the into so that we live happliy free of such future occasions we sort that 'how was it my mind failed me?' So as to take should desire to pray using the hymn: <‹"Î"{i Î"{i E"# Â"‡≤"{ilÎ"{|"Ø. precaution better we resort to pray the force behind motivation. Though mind, we feel, is our own it does not direct us to A few questions are likely to crop up. 'Whether we pray act always for our good. or not He only is the commanding and impelling force behind Mind is comprised of or say, made of, two distinet faculties: every happening in the Pindanda (material body of Jeeva) and Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 35 36 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

the Brahmaanda (<˙"X")í. Yes. If yes, why and how our prayer aspect, Â"‡„"{˙", would not misguide us in our ÷Òß"f. Â"‡„"{˙" is variable is of any necessity? The answer is, 'The prayer should be offered and it's effect could be favourably amendable. out of the real awareness of the fact and out of devotion Such a harmless motivation could be given by ˆ"{Î"‰"”Â"‡<|"Â"{ù inspired by such awareness in us that we are under the alone. While chanting ˆ"{Î"‰"” the stainless praying should be influence of all-motivating power of the universe'. And also, to beg Him, 'Oh God, kindly expend the accumulated effect this prayer is for begging with that all powerfull-power to of bad deed I did by the ÷Òß"f I do now; Allow not it to get motivate us in such a way that our action would be for our filled with some more Â"{Â"; Inspire me in such a way'. Thus Î"{iˆ" and A"iß" Further, also it is out of our sincere gratitude for . we could invoke His benevolence. Such process of motivation the so-far imparted motivation and for future motivations too. is indicated and promised in the saying- One another question. Our success or defeat, is cooked out ëµ"·’–{ C"wÎ"{i¬"Î"<|" Â"‡„"·# $í (To be contd...) of our own Karma. Based on this Karma is the motivation we get. When this is the case, of what use would be our prayer? The reply is 'It would have certainly of some good use'. KAAVI MADE MEANINGFUL

Prayer with total surrender with sincere devotion and Ascetics wear Kaavi robes. The colour Kaavi is not repentence brings us the grace and mercy of Him. This blunts original. White cloth is turned into Kaavi by smeaning the sharpness of the bad effects of our Karma and its slap would be tolerable. We would been granted with the sustainable it with mind. The meaning of the muddied cloth put on strength to withstand the beating. That would be a boon from by ascetics is that they should wash the dirty malabies Him. It wouldn't be ours just like that. In order to provide of society and while doing so they should not mind for us a scope for deceitless prayer Gayatri has come handy. getting smeared with dirt. (Which being an ascetic 'Protected be the chanter' is the meaning of the word ˆ"{Î"‰"”. could wash off himself.) Applying some more thoughts you could come to know one more aspect of prayer. We are incompetent to judge the Sri Vishvesha Tirtha Swamiji of Pejavara Matha has ÷Òß"f. ÷Òß"f intricacies of our To erase the effects of earlier some been doing this during the long terms of his ascetic other ÷Òß"f has to be resorted to inevitably. This again may bind life and with the assiduous adherence to the principle us with some other added unwanted effects. Caution should be exercised to protect us from such loadings. This requires of Kaavi. The Swamiji has brought respect and dignity proper motivation during ÷Òß"f. to Kaavi - observed Sri Vidyadheesha Tirtha Swamiji If ¬"”˙"C˙"„"{˙" is one incorrigible aspect behind the selection of Palimaru Matha, speaking in Udupi in the occasion of ways and means in our ÷Òß"f, the Â"‡„"{˙" (environmental, of the civic honour given to Sri Vishvesha Tirtha circumstantial and genetic forces) is the other aspcet in it. We Swamiji on the last day of his Paryaya. can surely pray for motivation from God so that this second Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 37 38 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

Dasa Sahitya Section : Does not Vasudeva Himself provide the satisfaction by Why bother on language? staying at all places and in all types of food? So how does What is the greatness of Sanskrit? it matter which food you eat? Eating is important!’ Nothing can be established by such dry arguments. It is -Prof. K. Hayavadana Puranik like asking: ‘all eat the same food, breath the same air, then PPVP, Bangalore why have distinctions of caste and religion?’ What is dharma? ‘There are many nations and languages from time What is neeti? What is madi? What is mailige? In all such immemorial. The devout exist even there. God responds to things it is shaastra alone which can guide and not logic. their language. Why bother on which language to be used?’ A lot of analysis has gone on language in our shaastras. ‘Knowledge of Sri Hari is important, not the language. Is At the end, it has been concluded that Sanskrit alone is the His greatness understandable only to the Sanskrit pundits and holy divine language. One who doesn’t know Sanskrit has no those with the ‘gatapataadi’ knowledge? Is Sanskrit important right to perform an yagnya! An yagnya gets destroyed if one or knowledge important? Please tell.’ talks any other language in the middle of it. To atone it one has to perform another yagnya called, ‘saarasvateeshti’. Sanskrit, ‘Is it not true that in all places and in all languages it therefore, is a holy language similar to the prescribed offerings is the presiding deities of letters who convey the meaning?’ in an yagnya. It is not to be compared with other languages. ‘desha kaala karma guna vichaaraachaara It is not that Gods do not know other languages. In divine bhaashe roopa kriyaa bhedavaadarenu? dispensations, Sanskrit is the prescribed language and hence doshadoorare neevu tattat sthaanadali called the divine language. vaasavaagiddu nambida janara mano- paasane prkaaradaleesutiralikke ‘If one with eyes denotes an aadarsha(mirror) with different yesu bageyinda chintisi salladu II’ -Vijaya Daasaru. words like ‘kannadi’ or ‘aayinaa’ in different languages, does it become different?’ asks Daasaraayaru. True, it doesn’t. But ‘aadarshavagataaksha bhaashaa the words of other languages like ‘kannadi’ may denote only bhedadindali kareyaladanu ni- that particular thing, but the Sanskrit word ‘aadarsha’ can shedha gaisavalokisade biduvare vivekigalu?’ project a whole lot of multifaceted aspects of that one thing -Jagannatha Daasaru. called the mirror. For example: The ‘aa’ in ‘aadarsha’ has two meanings; ‘channaagi’(very well) and ‘swalpa’(a little). If the ‘samskrutada sadagaravenu sugunarige?’ mirror is clear it shows the face ‘quite well’. If unclear it shows -Karjagi Daasappanavaru. ‘a little’. Since the mirror is an auspicious thing, it is ‘very Sanskrit is the language of Gods. well’ to be looked at by all in the mornings. Ladies all through For those who object as above, the Sanskrit pundits could the day ‘very well’ use it to look at their face. And so on. return the question this way. Thus the Sanskrit words imbibe a much larger canvas of Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 39 40 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

meanings. This capacity is lacking in other languages. One should not speak foreign (and banned) languages. If he speaks, can’t ask ‘what else in Sanskrit?’ or ‘what is its specialty?’. then he should atone the act with saarasvateeshti yagnya.’ Some ask: ‘we have translated everything in Sanskrit; there Bhagavata says: ‘Even a grammatically well written Sanskrit is nothing left in Sanskrit; why to support a dry buffalo?’ But work is not acceptable if it doesn’t portray the glories of Shri Sanskrit is a language that can never be translated with full Hari; it is like crow-dipped-dirty-pit-water and not a swan- import. For that matter no language can be translated in full. swimming-soul-stirring-lake’. In particular, Sanskrit is untenable for translation to any extent. ‘Tad dhwaanksha teertham, na tu hamsa sevitam’ For example: Vishnu-sahasra-naama has at least 100 meanings for each name. How is it possible to translate (all these in The above Bhagavata criticism is from the point of view a single word)? of content and not language. Daasaraayaru has no intention of discarding Sanskrit. He But lines, as given below, from Sesha-dharma opines that says:’Yaava bhaasheyalli ondu vishayavannu helidaru aa vishaya even if the content is good saashtra, it is not acceptable if agraahyavaaguvudilla. Mailigeyaada bhaasheyalli helida maatrakke it is written in praakruta languages. vastu mailigeyaaguvudilla.’(Whichever be the language used, a ‘bhaashayaa rachitam shaastramiha loke sukhapradam I concept never becomes unacceptable because of it. Unworthy paraloke bhayakaram tasmaat tat parivarjayet II’ language used doesn’t make the concept unworthy). But the tongue becomes unworthy, though not the concept! Hence, Inspite of shaastra being the content, once written in praakruta languages are banned during the period of yagnya! praakruta languages, it may bring knowledge, wealth, fame, A foreign language is banned at all times! status etc. in this world but fearful is its effect in the other worlds. ‘yastu prayumkte kushalo visheshe shabdaan yathaavad vyavaharakaale I Then how to accept this Harikathaamruta Saara, written so(a)nantamaapnoti phalam paratra in a language other than Sanskrit? The objection is not just vaagyogavid dushyati chaapashabdaih: II’ from the Sanskrit pundits alone. Stronger objection persists. One who knows grammar well and applies it correctly in In Bhaavaprakaashika commentary on Harikathaamruta Saara, usage can derive infinite benefits in the other worlds. Incorrect there is a different type of objection, as follows. application makes one sinful. “In Bhaagavata taatparya on 11th skanda it is said: ‘Tasmaad braahmanena na ‘Gardhabayaanam asamskruta vaaneetyaadeeh’ i.e. other than mlechetavyai naapabhaashitavyai Sanskrit sounds are equated to a vehicle drawn by donkeys”. ahitaagnirapashabdam prayujnai But this objection is incorrect since it is never said like saarasvateemishtim nirvapet II’ that anywhere in Bhaagavata Taatparya. In fact, it is a piece Te vedic lines of shathapatha-braahmana says: ‘A brahmin of a general proverb. The full lines are as follows: Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 41 42 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

‘baalasakhitvamakaarana haasyam bhakti heenaashva yo tathaa I streeshu vivaadamasajjana seva I baasha shaastreshu nirataaste Gardhabhayaanam asamskruta vai nirayabaaginah: II’ vaanee shatsu nare hyupayaati laghutvam II’ If one discards the Sanskrit works of puraanas, dharma Playing with kids, laughing for no reason, fighting with shaastras etc. and depends only on praakruta works as a means ladies, moving with the wicked, riding a donkey and singing to get liberated, then he shall be sharing the hell. folk without culture - these six will bring down the stature ‘sulida baaleya hanninandadi of anyone’s personality. Here, praakruta languages are not called kaleda sigurina kabbinandadi ‘mailige’. It is only said that it brings down one’s stature. aleda ushnada haalinandadi sulabavaagiruva I Still, the opposing lines from Sesha-dharma are to be sorted lalitavaha kannadada nudiyali out. How? tilidu tannali tanna mokshava Shri Hari agrees with Kannada pada: galisikondare saalade? samskrutadalinnenu?’ Daasaraayaru sorts it out like this: - Praakruta language, Sesha-dharma lines are warning those who talk as above; though not allowed during yagnya, is not banned for daily but not those who have high regard and faith in vedopanishats, routines. Vyaakarana-mahaa-bhaashya says: ‘Yagnye karmani sarvamoola and teeka-tippanis & yet study the praakruta works niyamo (a)nyathra aniyamah:’. Also, it is accepted in prayers due to their inabilities. Daasaraayaru has written this work to Sri Hari. Bhaagavata defines like this: for such people out of compassion and has praised praakruta by saying, ‘samskrutada sadagaravenu sugunarige’. He has not ‘stavairuchchaavachaih shroutaih condemned Sanskrit either. Its pomp & glory can not be pouraanyaih praakrutairapi I questioned by any. If one says that he could do devara-pooja stutvaa praseeda bhagavan in praakruta alone, then it goes against shaastras. At the end iti vandita dandavattu II’ of the pooja alone, praakruta is admitted for singing prayers. One should glorify Sri Hari with vedic, puranic and ‘kalusha vachanagalu, therefore, means: Since praakruta praakruta stotraas, small or big; and fall flat at his feet like language is accepted for use in praising the glories of Shri a staff, praying Him ‘O Lord, be pleased’. Hari, though not in yagnya and -pooja, this There is a long lineage of yatis(monks) and daasas who have Harikathaamruta Saara of mine shall please Him; as it joins sung in Kannada. the sea of greatness of His lotus feet. As He accepts Sanskrit, the language of devaas and scholars, Shri Hari shall accept and Sesha-darma lines, therefore, do not criticise prayers in admire this tainted praakruta as well.’ Kannada. Its view is quite different. It is explained by itself, in this way: ‘baalakana kalabhaashe jananiyu keli sukhapaduvante’. ‘puraana dharma shaastreshu ‘It is just like mother listening and enjoying her child’s Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 43 44 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

musings. Thus, when Shri Hari’s glories are sung in a language Pavana Yatra : admired by Him, will that go unaccepted by His devotees? Bannanje Won’t it become acceptable, even for the purest of the pure among the knowledgeable?’ - asks Daasaraayaru. Let us know about some villages and the temples which are connected with Acharya Madhva's life. ‘Shri Hari, thus shows his compassion on those who have no knowledge of Sanskrit, by allowing them to sing His glories, Bannanje Mahalingeshvara Temple: even in the impure praakruta language’, opines Daasaraayaru. o”ß"‹˙"<˙"¬"Î" (3-4) narrates an incident pertaining to this But it is incorrect to think that there was a period when temple and Acharya Madhva's life. At the age of only three Sanskrit pundits considered Kannada as impure and that years, Vasudeva (Sri Madhva's name before Sannyasa) was taken Daasaraayaru had answered them as above. When Bhaagavata by his mother to attend a marriage of their relative at has mentioned praakruta stotras, and Kannada songs were used Kodavuru. There, he just slipped away from the sight of his even by monks proficient in Sanskrit like Narahari Theertha, mother who was engrossed with her relatives, visited right from the time of Acharya Madhwa, it is a figment of Shankaranarayana temple at Kodavuru and from there came imagination to think that they themselves considered Kannada to Bannanje Mahalingeshvara temple. After offering his salutation as impure for the purpose. It is to be noted with interest that to Sri Mahalingeshvara's Antaryami Sri , the kid Daasaraayaru prefers to address the Sanskrit pundits with Vasudeva was guided by the same Narasimha-roopa till Udupi's respect as ‘maheesuraru’, meaning the earthly-gods. Chandramoulishvara temple. Mahalingeshvara temple in the village Bannanje is situated at a distance of about 3/4 Km. English translation by Prof. K. Murthy, Malleshwaram, Bangalore from Udupi to the west of City Bus Stand on the road leading to Adi Udupi. This place is refered to as ex"·E"{´ª÷iÒ°Î"·Â"Â"l{E|"ªC"¶ The Lord who grants all desires will not remember in Madhva Vijaya and as Talekude (in Tulu) in Bhavaprakashika. the shortcomings of those that remember Him. If one Sea Coast : To the west of Udupi is the west-coast of Indian sub-continent. This is the Arabian sea coast. Vadabhandeshvara will only offer back all acts to Him. He makes them is a place which is said to have got its name because a small ship had wrecked here. Though unfortunately, no solid material multifold, will feed himself and feed the giver on the proof is available here, the traditional belief is that it was here fruits therefore in diverse ways and immense one in where Acharya Madhva picked up the statue of Sri Krishna arrived from Dvaraka. You can reach this place via Malpe. the ocean of bliss,- the Lord of good and auspicious Malpe is at about 5 Km. to the west of Udupi. From Malpe, deeds, the embodiment of consciousness, the purifier take the road leading to Tottam. Vadabhandeshvara could be reached at about 2 Km. on this road. From here by covering of the Universe. 1.2 Km distance to west you would Kodavuru Shankaranarayana templa is the place where Vasudeva giving a slip to his mother Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 45 46 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

prostrated to Sri Narayana residing as the Antaryami in o”ß"‹˙"<˙"¬"Î". Acharya, to show his e

Comment : Haridasa Vaani : Hindu Binnahake baayillavayya

Dr. C.H. Srinivasa Murthy -E.D. Narahari Mysore 5112, Vedavathi Block, Nandi Enclave, II Cross, V Phase, BSK III Stage, Bangalore-85 A large body of Indian population is called 'Hindu'. (English rendering of a Kriti of ) According to the general and learned perception it is so called I've no voice, my Lord! because it follows . The suffix ism means practice, To seek your pardon. principles and doctrines etc. Since my sins are endless. The lure of the off-spring What are the common practices, principles and doctrines And of my life's mate in this body of Indian population? And mother and father! The lure of fun-loving friends There are theists and atheists among them. Therefore And of the King. neither the worship of God in the medium of idol nor The lure of cattle and land And of kith and kin! adherence to the Vedic preachings is a common practice. I banished you from my conscience, Similarly no common principle or doctrine is formed among O, Lord, the foe of demons! I beseech your benign care. 1 them. The vanity of food and wealth. Works on Indian philosophy deal with Jainism, Buddhism, The vanity of propserity And youth and beauty! Saankhya, and Nyaya-Vaisheshika etc. They have nothing The vanity of self-esteem under the caption 'Hinduism'. And conquests of territories! The vanity of vanquishments No Sanskrit work on Dharmashastras, philosophy, history of all advarsaries! 2 etc., uses the word Hindu. No Sanskrit lexicon lists this word. The lust for more And more and more! It appears that this word is only recent usage and that the The lust for a life originators used the word to denote people living on the banks That's hassle-free The lust for a life of the river Sindhu and it gradually got extended to the people That's full of pleasures living in other parts of India. The lust for a life That's past and last! (Views supported by evidences are invited on this subject. Guard me from these evils -Editor) O, Lord, Purandara vittala. 3 Mar.-Apr.-2002 TATVAVADA 49 50 TATVAVADA Mar.-Apr.-2002

A Respectful homage : Prayaga Swamiji and his mission CD-ROM on ACHARYA MADHVA A comprehensive resource suitable for academics, devotees, and chil- (Who opened a page in the history of Tatvavada Prasara in North India.) dren alike, about Madhva (13th cent.), the well-known proponent of the dualistic Vedanta. -B. Gururajacharya With the blessings of Sri Sri Vishvesha Tirtha Swamiji and Sri Sri Paramapoojya Sri Vidyamanya Tirtha's desires have remained Sugunendra Tirtha Swamiji of Sri Puttige Matha, Poornaprajna as dreams. Efforts were lacking from us in propagating Acharya Samshodhana Mandiram is proud to present a CD ROM on Acharya Madhva - his life, contribution and personality. Madhva's Tatvavada in Northern States of Hindi belt. Hindi knowing dedicated persons were in search by Sri Vidyamanya CONTENTS OF THE CD-ROM Tirtha. * Amongst the trinity of the founders of Vedanta schools, this C.D. on In 1962 one Sri Gadachinti Ramacharya approached and begged Acharya Madhva is the first. ª{ß"U"µl * Use of latest techniques to take the views to the contemporary events him for teaching Shastras. Beginning with till Sri Nyaya in Acharya Madhva's life. Sudha were taught by the Swamiji to this Shishya. In 1986, (May * Beautiful photographs covering all important places visited by 14) during the II Paryaya of Sri Vidyamanya Tirtha Sri Ramacharya Acharya Madhva along with their present details. was initiated to Sanyasa and was named as Vidyavallabha Tirtha * Each of the animation pictures in Madhva stories linked with the by the Swamiji. appropriate Sanskrit Shloka of Sri Madhva Vijaya and English trans- lation. Sri Vidyavallabha Tirtha took the torch of Tatvavada to enlighten * Vedic Suktas like Balittha, Manyu and Pavamana eulogising Madhva the Hindi belt. A huge three storied building in Prayaga worth recited traditionally and recorded in audio section. and more than a crore of rupees came up out of his own efforts. Dvadasha Stotra (Part) are also included in audio. It is now famous as Geeta Satsanga Bhavana. He toured to places * Authentic details based on Sri Madhva Vijaya, Bhava Prakashika such as Phatepur, Mirut, Aligarh, Eta and so on and propogated and other old compositions. Madhva Siddhanta conducting discourses on Geeta, Bhagavata etc. * The dialogue for the animation was originally composed by Prof. A. Haridasa Bhat and has been developed and adapted into English by His own Hindi translations of Madhva's Geeta Bhashyas and Sri N.A.P.S. Rao. Verified by Sri Bannanje Govindacharya. Upanishad Bhashyas were published by him. He used to camp * The entire book 'Philosophy of Sri ' by Prof. B.N.K. for months during Magha Mela for giving discourses. Many Sharma recorded on the CD (with his kind permission) for in-depth devotees having been trained up by him after initiation to Madhva study. Siddhanta are now spreading it with very high conviction even * Voices of Sri Sugunendra Tirtha Swamiji of Puttige Matha, Sri among non-Madhvas. Bannanje Govindacharya, Prof. D. Prahlada Char, Sri Vidyabhushana, Sri N.A.P.S. Rao etc., have been utilised for the Sri Vidhyavallabha Tirtha is no more with us. He attained appropriate audio sections. Haripad on 10.12.2001. The mission of |"y˙"Â"‡C"{ª which he took * In the development of the C.D., a special Committee with up from Sri Vidyamanya Tirtha awaits continuance by such Vidyaratnakara Bannanje Govindacharya (President), Prof. D. dedicated devotees. In the interview to Tatvavada (Kannada) journal Prahlada Char (Vice-President), Sri N.A.P.S. Rao (Secretary), Sri K.M. Sheshagiri has given their support with great enthusiasm. he strongly advocated that Madhva Vidyapeethas need to motivate Price : Rs. 500-00 (Plus Postal charge Rs. 125-00) and allocate a few dedicated Vidwans to take up this mission. For Abroad - $ 50 If so done it would be the most befitting respectful homage for a sage's soul who sacrificed his life for Madhva Siddhanta Prachara. Contact : [email protected] Tel : 6694026