Book Reviews British Generals in Blair's Wars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book Reviews British Generals in Blair's Wars BOOK REVIEWS British Generals The book is divided into five parts: in Blair’s Wars • Part I: Setting the scene in which by Jonathan Bailey, Richard the political context is described Iron and Hew Strachan (eds.) and in which former Prime Farnham, Surrey, UK, Ashgate Minister Tony Blair comes under a Publishing, 2013 great amount of criticism, for inter 385 pages, $51.70 (softcover) alia, not thinking through the con- ISBN 978-1-4094-3736-9 sequences of his decisions, in par- Reviewed by Colonel ticular those which led to British (Ret’d) P.J. Williams intervention in Iraq in 2003; ne of the generals • Part II: Hard Lessons, which who wrote a chap- focuses largely upon the early ter for this book, stages of Britain’s involvement in commenting on the Second Gulf War; other generals who • Part III: Iraq 2006-2009, and Ohad also authored chapters in this which is sub-titled, “Success of a volume, including some with whom Sort;” he had served, noted: “The major- • Part IV: Improving in Afghanistan; ity I would rate as fair, a few I and would gladly join and assault hell’s gate, and some I wouldn’t follow • Part V: What Have We Learnt? to the latrine.”1 Another, speaking of the press, observed: “You will To those lay readers who might hear media presenters tell you that expect this work to be a series of criti- they are committed to obtaining cal diatribes written by “intellectual an objective assessment of the news. Rubbish.”2 Having spent thugs” (which is how one of my professors characterized my three years on exchange with the British Army, I became very fellow cadets and I at the Royal Military College), there is not aware that the writing style of the Brits remains quite different a bit of that here. Each chapter is very well written, and several to ours, and can perhaps be best described as “robust,” while common themes become apparent: one being the need for clarity also getting its point across in a most forthright manner. And (clarity which was often lacking, as the contributors freely admit) so it was that I obtained a copy of this fine book, and indeed, from the political level in terms of the aim of the intervention. I was not disappointed. For one of the contributors at least, the British involvement in Iraq in 2003 had nothing to with Iraq, and everything to do with British Generals in Blair’s Wars is part of the Ashgate Series British-American security relations.3 Almost without exception, on Military Strategy and Operational Art. The work had its gen- the contributors writing here strongly express the view that we esis in a series of seminars presented at the University of Oxford need to be better at implementing the so-called “Comprehensive from 2005 to 2011 as part of the Leverhulm Programme on the Approach,” or what we in Canada have called the “Whole of Changing Character of War. The seminar consisted of a series of Government Approach.” Sound familiar? presentations by senior British officers, recently returned from senior operational command overseas, while also drawing upon Many of the generals here are writing of their time when a lifetime’s experience, experience which ranged from Northern serving within a higher US headquarters, often as the Deputy Ireland to the Balkans, Sierra Leone, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Most Commander, and so the book is replete with insights into the US of the contributors (the majority of whom were from the British way of war. Here I thought that the Brits might be overly critical Army) reached at least three-star rank, and there are also chapters of the military approach of our neighbours to the south. However, from a Royal Air Force Air Chief Marshal (full General equivalent), the book quickly disabused me of that notion. For the most part, a chapter on the psychological impact of operations by a senior, while some British generals deployed with a “John Wayne”4 image civilian medical practitioner, and a highly instructive contribution of the US military, they quickly came to be impressed at how rap- on civil-military relations by a former senior civil servant in the idly (compared to their own forces), for instance, the Americans Ministry of Defence (MoD). adapted to the Counter Insurgency (COIN) environment in Iraq. Vol. 16, No. 4, Autumn 2016 • Canadian Military Journal 79 BOOK REVIEWS Indeed, the book devotes much space to the subject of “learning • Joint Force Commander for NATO operations over Libya organizations,” with the British Armed Forces not always getting in 2011; top marks. The book is replete with several prescriptions as to • Command (as I write) of the Multinational Force and how things can be done better, admittedly from the military point Observers (MFO) in the Sinai Peninsula; of view. However, I found the advice from a former MoD civil servant regarding three potential areas of friction in civil military • Command of Joint Task Forces involved in domestic oper- relations, to be particularly useful. In his view, these were: ations; and indeed, • Component and higher command under the US during the • Timeframe; biennial Exercise Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC). • Strategic understanding and expectation; and 5 Surely with such an embarrassment of riches to draw from, • Culture, including the reaction to casualties. Canada could produce its own equivalent of British Generals in Blair’s Wars. One would hope that we are not (to quote the title As a very open and honest account (actually several accounts) of one of the chapters in this book), “Too Busy to Learn.” I would of generalship and high-level civil-military/Alliance/coalition rela- very strongly recommend this book to those, both military and tions in the post-Cold War era, this book can hardly be bettered. civilian, who work at the highest levels of Defence, and indeed, Sadly, MoD regulations regarding serving officers publishing for counterparts in Global Affairs Canada and in the Privy Council material that might be considered controversial resulted in six Office, for that matter. To those in uniform about to proceed on of the chapters being withdrawn. Pity. Perhaps there will be an senior collation or Alliance command appointments overseas, updated version of this book published when those contributors you should definitely make reading this book a mandatory part hang up their uniforms. Indeed, the just released (at the time of of your pre-deployment training. the writing of this review) UK Chilcot Report into Britain’s part in the 2003 Iraq War will no doubt reinforce many of the points Colonel (Ret’d) Williams’ final post before retiring was as raised herein. Director Arms Control Verification on the Strategic Joint Staff. Canada, apart from the odd exchange or seconded officer, did not participate in the Second Gulf War, although we do get NOTES passing mention in references to the Afghanistan conflict, in which we fielded a relatively sizeable contribution. Which begs 1. Graeme Lamb, “On Generals and Generalship,” in Jonathan Bailey, Richard the question of why we have no produced a similar work about Iron, and Hew Strachan (Eds.), British Generals in Blair’s Wars, (Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2013), p. 144. the experiences of our senior commanders on recent operations? 2. John McColl, “Modern Campaigning from a Practitioner’s Perspective, in In addition to Afghanistan, where we held many senior command Jonathan Bailey et al., p. 108. appointments, including command (by then Lieutenant-General 3. Justin Maciejewski, “Best Effort: Operation Sinbad and the Iraq Campaign”, in Rick Hillier) of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), Jonathan Bailey et al., p. 157. 4. This was the experience of General (Retired) Sir Nick Parker. He makes this Canadian general and flag officers have held or are holding such admission in a very useful on- line panel discussion about the book, which took diverse senior commands as: place at the International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS) in London, England on 17 July 2013. This discussion, just over an hour long, can be accessed at • Multinational Division South-West (MND-SW) in the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt2tkg4U4k 5. Desmond Bowen, “The Political-Military Relationship on Operations,” in Balkans; Jonathan Bailey et al., p.275. • Command of the multinational naval Combined Task Force 150 (CTF 150) in the Arabian Sea; • Command of the Canadian team working with the Office of the U.S. Security Coordinator to build security capacity in the Palestinian Authority; 80 Canadian Military Journal • Vol. 16, No. 4, Autumn 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Gaza-Israel: the Legal and the Military View Transcript
    Gaza-Israel: The Legal and the Military View Transcript Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2015 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 07 October 2015 Gaza-Israel: The Legal and Military View Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice QC General Sir Nick Parker For long enough commentators have usually assumed the Israel - Palestine armed conflict might be lawful, even if individual incidents on both sides attracted condemnation. But is that assumption right? May the conflict lack legality altogether, on one side or both? Have there been war crimes committed by both sides as many suggest? The 2014 Israeli – Gaza conflict (that lasted some 52 days and that was called 'Operation Protective Edge' by the Israeli Defence Force) allows a way to explore some of the underlying issues of the overall conflict. General Sir Nick Parker explains how he advised Geoffrey Nice to approach the conflict's legality and reality from a military point of view. Geoffrey Nice explains what conclusions he then reached. Were war crimes committed by either side? Introduction No human is on this earth as a volunteer; we are all created by an act of force, sometimes of violence just as the universe itself arrived by force. We do not leave the world voluntarily but often by the force of disease. As pressed men on earth we operate according to rules of nature – gravity, energy etc. – and the rules we make for ourselves but focus much attention on what to do when our rules are broken, less on how to save ourselves from ever breaking them. That thought certainly will feature in later lectures on prison and sex in this last year of my lectures as Gresham Professor of Law but is also central to this and the next lecture both on Israel and on parts of its continuing conflict with Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the Reserves’ Potential to Strengthen a Resilient and Global Britain
    Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the reserves’ potential to strengthen a resilient and global Britain May 2021 Contents Executive summary 7 Reserve Forces Review 2030 recommendations 11 Chapter 1 – Context and the imperative for change 15 Chapter 2 – Redefining the relationship between the reserves and society 25 Chapter 3 – Expanding the role of the reserves 43 Chapter 4 – Unlocking the potential of reservists 55 Chapter 5 – Transforming support to the reserves 73 Engagement log 88 Glossary 102 Reserve Forces Review 2030 3 4 Reserve Forces Review 2030 Foreword Brigadier The Rt Hon The Lord Lancaster TD VR When the Chief of the Defence Staff asked me to chair an independent review into the reserve forces, I leapt at the opportunity. For over 32 years, the Army Reserve has been an integral part of my life and perhaps the one constant of my adult years. Like many fellow reservists, my service has been part of a fairly consistent juggling act between the competing demands of a hectic professional career, private life and soldiering. In writing this foreword I recognise that so much has changed. Rather than looking ‘down and in’ at the use of The reserves have evolved from almost entirely reserves by the single services, we have been contingent forces – that trained at weekends tasked with looking ‘up and out’. and annual camps, recruited locally, and were At its heart, this Reserve Forces Review 2030 encapsulated by names such as ‘Territorial (RF30) is about people and skills, and how Army’ and ‘Royal Auxiliary Air Force’ – to the Defence, industry, government and wider reserve forces we have today across all three society can share them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Silent Prayer for Peace the Friend Independent Quaker Journalism Since 1843
    11 March 2016 £1.90 the DISCOVER THE CONTEMPORARYFriend QUAKER WAY A silent prayer for peace the Friend INDEPENDENT QUAKER JOURNALISM SINCE 1843 COntents VOL 174 NO 11 3 Thought for the Week: 12 ‘Fierce Feathers’, ambulance trains A silent prayer for peace and surrealism Jane Taylor Simon Colbeck 4-5 News 13 Poem: Water of life 6 Moving beyond difference Bob Morley Gretchen Castle 14 God is reality 7 Pisac and equality Abigail Maxwell Daniel Hewitt 15 Austerity 8 Housing and inequality Don Atkinson Fred Ashmore 16 q-eye: a look at the Quaker world 9 Letters 17 Friends & Meetings 10-11 Living out our faith: Passing the problem by Ian Beeson …Slavery as an evil shared many of the qualities of the present housing situation – it benefited the wealthy, created an underclass and denied them human rights.… Quaker faith & practice 23.23 Cover image: Graveyard at Hitchin Meeting, Hertfordshire, which will be included in their new commemorative garden. Photo courtesy Hitchin Meeting. See story page 4. The Friend Subscriptions Advertising Editorial UK £82 per year by all payment Advertisement manager: Editor: types including annual direct debit; George Penaluna Ian Kirk-Smith monthly payment by direct debit [email protected] £7; online only £63 per year. Articles, images, correspondence For details of other rates, Tel/fax 01535 630230 should be emailed to contact Penny Dunn on 54a Main Street, Cononley [email protected] 020 7663 1178 or [email protected] Keighley BD20 8LL or sent to the address below. the Friend 173 Euston Road, London NW1
    [Show full text]
  • Download Journal
    Inspiring Issue 3 2019 Join the The challenge combinations to institutions Anthony Painter asks conversationRawthmells is open Mon-Fri, how we can create a new J Rawthmells8.30am–9pm. is Joinopen us Mon–Fri, for coffee, 8.30am– institutional landscape OURNAL 9pm.all-day Join dining us for and coffee, cocktails, all-day and dining andbe inspired cocktails, by andour befantastic inspired offers: by our Pankaj Mishra on inequality, fantastic offers: democracy, nationalism and compassion JUNE Baroness Wolf addresses Celebrate the start of British summer with a Whitehall’s shortcomings 10%glass of Pimm’sdiscount paired with potted for salmon JULY anyDo it the groupFrench way and booking enjoy a glass ofof Crémant over with 10a cheese people plate AUGUST OfferMake theavailable most of 6pm–9pm the last days Mon–Fri of summer Emailsunshine [email protected] with an Aperol Spritz and to savecicchetti your space ONLY £5, from 5.30pm each day Not to be used with any other offer All profits from the sale of food and drink help to fund the RSA’s social change programmes OurProfits 21st from century the enlightenmentsale of food and coffeehouse, drink in our Rawthmells,21st century isenlightenment designed to fostercoffeehouse the creative help to thinking fund the and RSA’s collaborative social change action programmes. needed to address Our high- today’squality ingredientssocial challenges. are sourced Take to and The produced Steps, our in linemini-amphitheatre, with best ethical enjoy our livelypractices events and programme, our waste cooking or just comeoils are along collected to enjoy and the converted vibrant atmosphere.into biofuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Denied Vital Equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan, Claims Former SAS Head
    Www.telegraph.co.ukBy Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent10:21PM GMT 04 Mar 2010 Army denied vital equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan, claims former SAS head British troops were deprived of the right equipment to fight wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and were still being hampered by a lack of resources, the former head of special forces has claimed. The coffins of Private Martin Kinggett, Sergeant Paul Fox, Private Carlo Apolis and SAC Luke Southgate carried onto an RAF C17 at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan Photo: MoD/GETTY In a withering assessment of the “doomed” state of the military, the recently retired Lt Gen Sir Graeme Lamb said that the SAS had been denied even Vietnam-era equipment that could have saved lives. Resources remained insufficient to fight current and future conflicts, with much of the Army’s equipment “either broken or lacking”, he warned. Sir Graeme’s attack, in a speech to senior officers, is disclosed as Gordon Brown faces questions at the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war. The inquiry has been told that the Armed Forces were forced to cope without a wide range of equipment because of a lack of funds from the Treasury when Mr Brown was chancellor. General Lord Gurthrie of Craigiebank, who was chief of the defence staff from 1997 to 2001, also said soldiers died in Afghanistan because Gordon Brown starved the Army of funding when he was Chancellor. “Not fully funding the Army in the way they had asked ... undoubtedly cost the lives of soldiers. He should be asked why he was so unsympathetic towards defence and so sympathetic to other departments,” he told The Times.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation and Reintegration What Is Reconciliation? What Is Reintegration?
    Afghanistan Policy Page 6 April A one-page brief from the Afghanistan Congressional Communications Hub on a major 2010 issue concerning U.S. policy and engagement in Afghanistan. Reconciliation and Reintegration What is Reconciliation? What is Reintegration? Reconciliation aims to engage senior insurgents in order Reintegration involves the process of low- and mid-level insurgents to achieve a settlement between all key parties and end laying down their weapons and rejoining Afghan society. the insurgency. The process is targeted at local insurgent ‘foot soldiers’ who are often Experts observe that reconciliation is one of the most believed to only be fighting to earn money or because they feel there difficult and complex challenges of the Afghan campaign. is no better option for them, with many operating on a part-time or seasonal basis. There are many opinions on how this process should be carried out. Amongst the issues that remain unclear are: A Peace and Reintegration Program, funded by international donors, who should lead the process is still in development. It will be led by an Afghan official. Analysts what role the international community should play observe that the nature of reintegration at the ground level may present issues for coordination of the process. whether the process involves a ‘grand bargain’ or should constitute informal, incremental steps U.S. officials have pointed out that a key component to the process – towards building trust shared by the Afghan government and its international partners – is to provide protection and jobs for the former fighters in order to what the expected timeframe should look like encourage more to join the trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Disclosure of Senior Staff Hospitality 2009-10 Quarter 4 (1 January – 31 March 2010)
    MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DISCLOSURE OF SENIOR STAFF HOSPITALITY 2009-10 QUARTER 4 (1 JANUARY – 31 MARCH 2010) Name Post Date Organisation Name Type of Hospitality Received Air Chief Marshal Chief of the Air 5 January The Union Jack Club Reception Sir Stephen Dalton Staff 12 January EADS and Airbus Reception 20 January Bahrain International Air Reception Show Dinner Lunch 25 January Soldiers in the Air Reception 9 February Birmingham University Dinner 10 February Sir Neville Trotter Lunch 18 February Sailors, Soldiers, Reception Airmen and Families Association 22 February Bob Barton Lunch MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DISCLOSURE OF SENIOR STAFF HOSPITALITY 2009-10 QUARTER 4 (1 JANUARY – 31 MARCH 2010) Name Post Date Organisation Name Type of Hospitality Received Air Chief Marshal Chief of the Air 23 February Royal Air Forces Dinner Sir Stephen Dalton Staff Association 1 March BAE Systems Dinner 5 March Charlie Gilbert Lunch 17 March The Guild of Air Pilots Dinner and Air Navigators 22 – 24 March BAE Systems Lunch Reception Dinner Thales Reception MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DISCLOSURE OF SENIOR STAFF HOSPITALITY 2009-10 QUARTER 4 (1 JANUARY – 31 MARCH 2010) Name Post Date Organisation Name Type of Hospitality Received General Sir Nick Vice Chief of the 12 January Airbus Reception Houghton Defence Staff 21 January Cohort PLC Reception 25 January Fujitsu Refreshments 9 February Fujitsu Reception 18 February Sailors, Soldiers, Reception Airmen and Families Association 10 March Centre for Policy Dinner Studies 12 March Gold Cup Race Lunch and Ticket for the Races
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking Defence to Meet New Threats
    House of Commons Defence Committee Re-thinking defence to meet new threats Tenth Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 March 2015 HC 512 Published on 24 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies Current membership Rory Stewart MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chair) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co–op, Barrow and Furness) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in the House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the Committee’s website on the inquiry page. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Rhys (Clerk), Leoni Kurt (Second Clerk), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Ian Thomson (Committee Specialist), Christine Randall (Senior Committee Assistant), Alison Pratt and Carolyn Bowes (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Society-Military Relationship in Afghanistan
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE PeaceBrIeF56 United States Institute of Peace • www.usip.org • Tel. 202.457.1700 • Fax. 202.429.6063 September 24, 2010 LISA SCHIRCH The Civil Society-Military Relationship E-mail: [email protected] in Afghanistan Phone: 540.383.4859 Summary • The intense challenge of coordinating government civilians with military actors in the Interna- tional Security Assistance Forces’ Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan has inhibited development of military relationships with civil society. • The counterinsurgency strategy of “shape, clear, hold, build” invites civil society organizations (CSOs) to play key roles in the final “build” stage at the operational level. Yet many CSOs resist “coordination” in a mission and strategy different from their own. • CSOs seek greater policy dialogue and “communication” with high-level ISAF decision makers, particularly during planning stages. An ongoing, high-level forum for civil society-military policy Both CSOs and ISAF dialogue could help address tensions, provide a mechanism for CSOs to share their conflict as- “leadership recognize the need sessments, and explore areas for possible collaboration such as in security sector reform. for a ‘mature’ civil-military dialogue, including Afghan Introduction National Security Forces, There are different types of civil-military relationships in Afghanistan. The International Security which is sustained by relation- Assistance Forces’ (ISAF) stated mission in Afghanistan is to protect the population while extending ships built over time where the legitimacy and effectiveness of the government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) and decreasing the effectiveness of insurgent elements. The Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) a degree of trust allows for model attempts to link security, governance, and development by bringing together military and honest conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nexus Between Cybersecurity and Biosecurity Winning the Peace Series
    1 THE NEXUS BETWEEN CYBERSECURITY AND BIOSECURITY WHITE PAPER ​ ​ ​ ___________________________________________ KEY INSIGHTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE WINNING THE PEACE SERIES 13 MAY 2020 ​ ​ HOSTED BY C5 CAPITAL 1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20006 SAVILE ROW HOUSE 7 VIGO STREET LONDON W1S 3HF Strictly Private & Confidential WINNING THE PEACE | BIOSECURITY NEXUS WHITE PAPER | 2 ​ ​ ​ This report is based on discussions that took place during the inaugural Winning the Peace ​ discussion on Wednesday, May 13th. We virtually convened a talented group of over 80 technologists, military, government and industry leaders, including Gen. Jim Mattis, Bud MacFarlane, Adm. Mike Hewitt, Former Congressman Pat Tiberi, and Gen. Jim Keffer for a strategic discussion on The Nexus Between Cybersecurity and Biosecurity. All of our ​ ​ ​ participants share a commitment to the US-UK alliance as a channel for preserving our sovereignty, security and prosperity toward a more resilient future. The event opened with remarks by André Pienaar, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of C5 Capital, sharing his prediction that the biosecurity sector will become as large as the cybersecurity sector in the near future. It was moderated by Sir Graeme Lamb, C5 Operating Partner & Former Director of UK Special Forces, and featured expert panelists Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, OBE RE(V) and Brigham B. Bechtel. The Winning the Peace series is hosted by C5 Capital, a specialist venture capital firm. Throughout the series, our goal is to convene technologists, military, government and industry leaders to consider pillars of a post Covid-19 world order, rooted in the opportunity we consider for UK and US partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES PROFESSOR MICHAEL BURLEIGH is a Research Professor at University of Buckingham, and taught at Oxford, LSE, Rutgers, Stanford and Cardiff in his twenty year academic career as a historian. His thirteen books include The Third Reich: A New History (Samuel Johnson Prize 2001) and most recently Small Wars, Faraway Places: The Genesis of the Modern World 1945-65 (long listed for the Samuel Johnson Prize 2014). His books have been translated into 24 languages. In 2012 he won the Nonino "International Master of His Time Prize" for his life’s work. He is a regular commentator on global affairs and terrorism in the Times, Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday. He is the founder of the geopolitical risk company Sea Change Partners LLP which he set up with George Walden four years ago. LIEUTENANT GENERAL SIR GRAEME LAMB is a former Director of UK Special Forces and Commander of the British Field Army. With a reputation for ‘blasphemous plain speaking’, he is widely recognised for his intimate appreciation for Hobbes’s view of man with his articulation of ‘reconcilable and irreconcilable’ actors in modern conflict. He graduated from The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in 1973 and went on to command at every rank on operations leading Conventional, Airborne and Special Forces. Working with others: Lamb has, by dint of his appointments, found himself not only operating overseas but nearly always with and alongside others, in particular the United States Special Forces. This ranged from small-scale Counter-Narcotics operations in South America, Persons Indicted for War Crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina to Deputy Commanding General Multi-National Forces Iraq under US General David Petraeus.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Senior Civilian Representative Report
    NATO Senior Civilian Representative Report A Comprehensive Approach Lessons Learned in Afghanistan 15 July 2010 Executive Summary The Secretary General instructed the NATO Senior Civilian Representative (SCR) in Afghanistan to provide a concise report which portrays lessons learned in Afghanistan that are relevant to the further development of NATO’s contribution to a comprehensive approach (CA) in the context of the revised Strategic Concept. Although the Secretary General specifically asked for the experience and views of the SCR, the SCR directed a more inclusive approach, and therefore the findings presented in this report embrace the ideas of senior NATO leaders in Kabul, including the Commander International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Commander ISAF Joint Command, the UN and EU Special Representatives in Afghanistan, as well as the views of the SCR himself. Four consistent propositions emerged: • The application of a well-resourced comprehensive approach might not ensure success; but without it, we will fail. • Application of a comprehensive approach is a persuasive way for NATO to address contemporary crisis response operations and is fundamentally important to NATO; however, there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’. • It is essential that the analysis, planning and preparation of multi-agency crisis response operations are addressed collectively by all actors, building political will early and sustaining it throughout the campaign. • A comprehensive approach demands unity of effort across the political, military and civil pillars embodied in military unity of command, where all actors share a unity of purpose realized by harmonising efforts, sharing burden and sustaining political will in order to achieve an overarching political goal that is shared by the host nation and external actors.
    [Show full text]