117 Reassessing the Roles of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

117 Reassessing the Roles of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (117-152) How to cite this article: Azrae, A. N. (2020). Reassessing the roles of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers in the making of international treaties. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 117-152. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.11.2.2020.8006 REASSESSING THE ROLES OF THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG AND THE RULERS IN THE MAKING OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES Ahmad Nasyran Azrae School of Law, College of Law, Government and International Studies Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia [email protected] Received: 9/1/2020 Revised: 5/5/2020 Accepted: 10/6/2020 Published: 31/7/2020 ABSTRACT Malaysia continuously negotiates, signs and ratifies international treaties to foster closer relationships with its counterparts. The Federal Constitution of Malaysia provides no direct provision in granting treaty-making capacity to a specific person(s) or institution(s). However, it may be deduced from the available provisions that such power is exercisable by the executive arm of the Federal Government. By definition, the executive includes the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, who is elected among the Malay Rulers by the Conference of Rulers. This paper reassesses the roles and functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers in the making of international treaties. The study was carried out using library based research method which assessed the provisions of the Federal Constitution, local case(s) and international conventions, in particular the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969. The paper delved into the available legal documents to explain the functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers under the Federal Constitution and accordingly reassessed the legal positions of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the 117 UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (117-152) Rulers in the making of international treaties. The findings of this paper showed that in practice, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers have no executive powers to conclude and sign international treaties. Nonetheless, the Federal Constitution does confer certain limited powers on the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers that may indirectly influence the making of international treaties where their roles are normally consultative in nature. Keywords: Treaty-making, executive authority, federal constitution, international law. INTRODUCTION Malaysia pursues international cooperation with members of the international communities, which covers both States and international organizations. Malaysia became a member of the United Nations (UN), an international arena in September 1957, less than one month after achieving independence. Besides the UN, Malaysia also participated in several other key organizations, including the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). At the regional level, Malaysia’s commitment towards fostering international cooperation is mainly realised through its participation in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) since its inception in 1967. In addition, Malaysia also establishes bilateral ties with a number of country partners such as Pakistan, New Zealand, India, Chile, Australia and Turkey. This cooperation is predominantly effected through the conclusion of international treaties that spelt out the rights and duties governing the relationship between the State-parties. In the past few years, the Government had made a number of controversial decisions with regard to participating in international treaties. For instance, on 4 April 2016, the government had joined 11 other Pacific nations in signing the now discontinued Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement (‘TPPA’).1 The TPPA was signed by 1 Howard, R. (2016, February 4). Pacific rim trade deal signed, but years of negotiations still to come. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www. reuters.com/article/us-trade-tpp/trans-pacific-partnership-trade-deal- signed-but-years-of-negotiations-still-to-come-idUSKCN0VD08S; 118 UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (117-152) the then Minister of International Trade and Industry despite strong opposition from different factions within the country. The TPPA perceived as harmful to the national, economic and bumiputera interests.2 Following this was the unpopular announcement from the ruling Pakatan Harapan (‘PH’) government to accede to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (‘ICERD’).3 The majority of the Malays rejected ICERD as it jeopardized the privileges of the Malay Rulers, the Malays, the bumiputeras and the religion of Islam as guaranteed in the Federal Constitution.4 Conceivably, the most significant turn of events came in March 2019 when the PH government officially acceded to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998 (‘Rome Statute’).5 The decision Malaysia inks landmark TPPA. (2016, February 5). The Star Online. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/02/05/ malaysia-inks-landmark-tppa-it-joins-11-other-nations-in-signing- pact. 2 Lim, I. (2017, January 31). US’ withdrawal no cause for celebration with Malaysia’s anti-TPPA groups. MalayMail. Retrieved from https:// www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2017/01/31/us-withdrawal- no-cause-for-celebration-with-malaysias-anti-tppa-groups/1303305; Bantah TPPA. (2016, January 27). Bantah TPPA’s response to Mustapa’s speech. MalaysiaKini. Retrieved from https://www.malaysiakini.com/ letters/328359. 3 Minister: govt to ratify convention on racial discrimination, five other treaties in q1 2019. (2018, October 25). Malaysia Today. Retreived from https://www.malaysia-today.net/2018/10/25/minister-govt-to- ratify-convention-on-racial-discrimination-five-other-treaties-in-q1- 2019/. 4 Govt not ratifying ICERD. (2018, November 24). The Star Online. Retreived from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/11/24/ govt-not-ratifying-icerd-we-will-continue-to-defend-federal- constitution-says-pms-office; Malaysia govt says it won’t ratify UN rights treaty after facing anger from malays and muslims. (2018, November 23). The Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www. straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysia-govt-says-wont-ratify-rights- treaty-after-facing-anger-from-malays-and-muslims. 5 Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2019, March 4). Malaysia accedes to the Rome statute of the international criminal court [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/home2/-/asset_publisher/satu_ tab/content/press-release-malaysia-accedes-to-the-rome-statute-of-the- international-criminal-court?inheritRedirect=false. 119 UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (117-152) had caught the interests of many, including from the royalty. The signing of the Rome Statute brought condemnation based on few grounds. First, the Rome Statute perceived as encroaching on the position of the monarch and the immunity of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (‘YDPA’). Second, the Government became a subject of criticism for acting against the Federal Constitution when they acceded to the Rome Statute without consulting the Conference of Rulers (COR), whose interests could be jeopardised under the treaty.6 Besides, the Foreign Minister had to brief the YDPA on the latest status and development following the government’s accession to the Rome Statute.7 Relentless pressure ‘forced’ the government to withdraw from the Rome Statute in April 2019, slightly one month after acceding to the treaty. In announcing the government’s decision, Prime Minister Mahathir cited that withdrawal from the Rome Statute was to avoid ‘political confusion’ created by certain groups of people with personal interests.8 The events following the accession to the Rome Statute raised some noteworthy points that require appropriate legal assessment. The role of the YDPA and the Rulers, which constitute the COR, in the making of international treaties became the centre of attention. This is supported by the following facts, namely: a letter was presented to the acting YDPA informing His Royal Highness on the Cabinet’s decision to accede to the Rome Statute; the Minister of Foreign Affairs was called to brief the YDPA on the status of Malaysia’s 6 Malaysia withdraws from the Rome statute. (2019, April 5). The Star Online. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/ nation/2019/04/05/malaysia-withdraws-from-the-rome-statute; Malaysia withdraws from the Rome statute of the international criminal court. (2019, April 5). The Straits Times. Retreived from https://www. straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysia-withdraws-from-the-rome- statute. 7 Prime Minister’s Office of Malaysia. (2019, March 13). Kenyataan akhbar berhubung menteri luar negeri menghadap KDYMM Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.my/2019/03/kenyataan-akhbar-berhubung- menteri-luar-negeri-menghadap-kebawah-duli-yang-maha-mulia-seri- paduka-baginda-yang-di-pertuan-agong-kln/. 8 Malaysia withdraws from the Rome statute. (2019, April 5); Malaysia withdraws from the Rome statute of the international criminal court. (2019, April 5). 120 UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (117-152) participation in the Rome Statute; and the allegation that the COR was not consulted prior to the signing of the instrument of accession. Accordingly, this paper seeks to reassess the position and the role of the YDPA and the Rulers in the making of international treaties. The study was carried out using library based research method which assessed the provisions from the Federal Constitution, local case(s) and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 (‘Vienna Convention 1969’), being
Recommended publications
  • Federal Constitution of Malaysia
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION First introduced as the Constitution … 31 August 1957 of the Federation of Malaya on Merdeka Day Subsequently introduced as the … … 16 September 1963 Constitution of Malaysia on Malaysia Day PREVIOUS REPRINTS First Reprint … … … … … 1958 Second Reprint … … … … … 1962 Third Reprint … … … … … 1964 Fourth Reprint … … … … … 1968 Fifth Reprint … … … … … 1970 Sixth Reprint … … … … … 1977 Seventh Reprint … … … … … 1978 Eighth Reprint … … … … … 1982 Ninth Reprint … … … … … 1988 Tenth Reprint … … … … … 1992 Eleventh Reprint … … … … … 1994 Twelfth Reprint … … … … … 1997 Thirteenth Reprint … … … … … 2002 Fourteenth Reprint … … … … … 2003 Fifteenth Reprint … … … … … 2006 Federal Constitution CONTENTS PAGE ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES 3–15 CONSTITUTION 17–208 LIST OF AMENDMENTS 209–211 LIST OF ARTICLES AMENDED 212–229 4 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION NOTE: The Notes in small print on unnumbered pages are not part of the authoritative text. They are intended to assist the reader by setting out the chronology of the major amendments to the Federal Constitution and for editorial reasons, are set out in the present format. Federal Constitution 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES PART I THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION Article 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation 3. Religion of the Federation 4. Supreme Law of the Federation PART II FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES 5. Liberty of the person 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia, September 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Malaysia, September 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: MALAYSIA September 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Malaysia. Short Form: Malaysia. Term for Citizen(s): Malaysian(s). Capital: Since 1999 Putrajaya (25 kilometers south of Kuala Lumpur) Click to Enlarge Image has been the administrative capital and seat of government. Parliament still meets in Kuala Lumpur, but most ministries are located in Putrajaya. Major Cities: Kuala Lumpur is the only city with a population greater than 1 million persons (1,305,792 according to the most recent census in 2000). Other major cities include Johor Bahru (642,944), Ipoh (536,832), and Klang (626,699). Independence: Peninsular Malaysia attained independence as the Federation of Malaya on August 31, 1957. Later, two states on the island of Borneo—Sabah and Sarawak—joined the federation to form Malaysia on September 16, 1963. Public Holidays: Many public holidays are observed only in particular states, and the dates of Hindu and Islamic holidays vary because they are based on lunar calendars. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date); Chinese New Year (movable set of three days in January and February); Muharram (Islamic New Year, movable date); Mouloud (Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday, movable date); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (movable date in May); Official Birthday of His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (June 5); National Day (August 31); Deepavali (Diwali, movable set of five days in October and November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date); and Christmas Day (December 25). Flag: Fourteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes of equal width, representing equal membership in the Federation of Malaysia, which is composed of 13 states and the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Constitution of 1957 with Amendments Through 2007
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Malaysia's Constitution of 1957 with Amendments through 2007 Subsequently amended This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents PART I: THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION . 12 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation . 12 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation . 12 3. Religion of the Federation . 12 4. Supreme law of the Federation . 13 PART II: FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES . 13 5. Liberty of the person . 13 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited . 14 7. Protection against retrospective criminal laws and repeated trials . 14 8. Equality . 14 9. Prohibition of banishment and freedom of movement . 15 10. Freedom of speech, assembly and association . 15 11. Freedom of religion . 16 12. Rights in respect of education . 17 13. Rights to property . 17 PART III: CITIZENSHIP . 17 Chapter 1: Acquisition of Citizenship . 17 14. Citizenship by operation of law . 17 15. Citizenship by registration (wives and children of citizens) . 18 15A. Special power to register children . 18 16. Citizenship by registration (persons born in the Federation before Merdeka Day) . 19 16A. Citizenship by registration (persons resident in States of Sabah and Sarawak on Malaysia Day) . 19 17. Repealed . 19 18. General provisions as to registration . 19 19. Citizenship by naturalisation . 20 19A. Repealed . 21 20. Repealed . 21 21. Repealed . 21 22. Citizenship by incorporation of territory . 21 Chapter 2: Termination of Citizenship .
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Role of Malaysia's Royalty
    www.rsis.edu.sg No. 107 – 12 July 2021 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Mr Yang Razali Kassim, Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected]. The Evolving Role of Malaysia’s Royalty By Piya Sukhani SYNOPSIS As Malaysia’s political instability continues, the royalty will take on an increasingly influential position in the country’s politics and governance. COMMENTARY PRIME MINISTER Muhyiddin Yassin has agreed to reopen the country’s suspended parliament for a five-day sitting from 26 July 2021. This comes after the Malaysian King called on 16 June for parliament to be reconvened as soon as possible. This was a contradiction of Muhyiddin’s previously proposed timeline for reopening the House by September at the earliest. The rulers have held a largely symbolic position since Malaysia’s Independence, but their role in national politics has become increasingly prominent and critical, particularly since 2020, when political fragmentation reached the point where no coalition had a clear and substantive parliamentary majority. Royalty in Politics Following Mahathir Mohamad’s abrupt resignation as premier in February 2020, King Sultan Abdullah took centre stage in seeking to resolve a week-long impasse by interviewing each of Malaysia’s 222 Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine who enjoyed a majority in parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan 2009-2015
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS STRATEGIC PLAN 2009-2015 Published By MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Wisma Putra Jalan Wisma Putra, Precinct 2, 62602 Putrajaya, Malaysia. NEGARAKU Negaraku Tanah tumpahnya darahku Rakyat hidup Bersatu dan maju Rahmat bahagia Tuhan kurniakan Raja kita Selamat bertakhta Rahmat bahagia Tuhan kurniakan Raja kita Selamat bertakhta WISMA PUTRA MUSICAL SCORE WISMA PUTRA Wisma Putra, Wadah Negara Suaramu Di Persada Dunia Mengungkap Bahasa Mencipta Adil Serta Saksama Wisma Putra Di Sejagat Raya Perjuangkan Kemanusiaan Meneroka Kesepakatan Mencipta Kesejahteraan Wisma Putra, Suara Malaysia Wisma Putra, Di Persada Dunia Berkibar Selamanya, Bendera Wisma Putra Demimu Malaysia, Negaraku Yang Tercinta Wisma Putra Mengisi Harapan Berjuang Untuk Umat Manusia Satu Nada Satu Suara Berdaulat Serta Merdeka Wisma Putra, Suara Malaysia Wisma Putra, Di Persada Dunia Berkibar Selamanya, Bendera Wisma Putra Demimu Malaysia, Negaraku Yang Tercinta Berkibar Selamanya, Bendera Wisma Putra Demimu Malaysia, Negaraku Yang Tercinta Senikata : YB Dato’ Seri Syed Hamid Albar Senilagu : Sha’aban Yahya FOREWORD BY Y.B. DATO’ SERI UTAMA DR. RAIS YATIM MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, MALAYSIA “..it is vital that Malaysia’s foreign policy continues to be guided by the fundamental principles of promoting and protecting the national interest while responsibly and effectively contributing towards the building of a fair and just world.” Wisma Putra, Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, is the custodian of the country’s international relations and foreign policy. In shouldering this responsibility, we have geared the country’s foreign policy towards fostering better relations with our neighbours and trading partners. We have worked collectively with our partners to secure an environment that is conducive to national development.
    [Show full text]
  • Open LIM Doctoral Dissertation 2009.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications BLOGGING AND DEMOCRACY: BLOGS IN MALAYSIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE A Dissertation in Mass Communications by Ming Kuok Lim © 2009 Ming Kuok Lim Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2009 The dissertation of Ming Kuok Lim was reviewed and approved* by the following: Amit M. Schejter Associate Professor of Mass Communications Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Richard D. Taylor Professor of Mass Communications Jorge R. Schement Distinguished Professor of Mass Communications John Christman Associate Professor of Philosophy, Political Science, and Women’s Studies John S. Nichols Professor of Mass Communications Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This study examines how socio-political blogs contribute to the development of democracy in Malaysia. It suggests that blogs perform three main functions, which help make a democracy more meaningful: blogs as fifth estate, blogs as networks, and blogs as platform for expression. First, blogs function as the fifth estate performing checks-and-balances over the government. This function is expressed by blogs’ role in the dissemination of information, providing alternative perspectives that challenge the dominant frame, and setting of news agenda. The second function of blogs is that they perform as networks. This is linked to the social-networking aspect of the blogosphere both online and offline. Blogs also have the potential to act as mobilizing agents. The mobilizing capability of blogs facilitated the mass street protests, which took place in late- 2007 and early-2008 in Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity
    An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies School of History and Politics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT v DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ix GLOSSARY xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introductory Background 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Aims and Objectives 5 1.4. Scope and Limitation 6 1.5. Literature Review 7 1.6. Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework 17 1.7. Research Methodology 25 1.8. Significance of Study 26 1.9. Thesis Organization 27 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 30 2.1. Introduction 30 2.2. The Historical Background of Malaysia 32 2.3. The Historical Background of Singapore 34 2.4. The Period of British Colonial Rule 38 i 2.4.1. Malayan Union 40 2.4.2. Federation of Malaya 43 2.4.3. Independence for Malaya 45 2.4.4. Autonomy for Singapore 48 2.5. Singapore’s Inclusion in the Malaysian Federation (1963-1965) 51 2.6. The Period after Singapore’s Separation from Malaysia 60 2.6.1. Tunku Abdul Rahman’s Era 63 2.6.2 Tun Abdul Razak’s Era 68 2.6.3. Tun Hussein Onn’s Era 76 2.7. Conclusion 81 3 CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 83 3.1. Introduction to the Issues Affecting Relations Between Malaysia and Singapore 83 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Southeast Asia
    ISSN 0219-3213 2018 no. 22 Trends in Southeast Asia THE PERAK SULTANATE: TRANSITIONING INTO THE 21ST CENTURY BARBARA WATSON ANDAYA TRS22/18s ISBN 978-981-4843-34-8 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 7 8 9 8 1 4 8 4 3 3 4 8 Trends in Southeast Asia 18-J04948 01 Trends_2018-22.indd 1 11/12/18 8:43 AM The ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) is an autonomous organization established in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are grouped under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). The Institute is also home to the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) and the Singapore APEC Study Centre. ISEAS Publishing, an established academic press, has issued more than 2,000 books and journals. It is the largest scholarly publisher of research about Southeast Asia from within the region. ISEAS Publishing works with many other academic and trade publishers and distributors to disseminate important research and analyses from and about Southeast Asia to the rest of the world. 18-J04948 01 Trends_2018-22.indd 2 11/12/18 8:43 AM 2018 no. 22 Trends in Southeast Asia THE PERAK SULTANATE: TRANSITIONING INTO THE 21ST CENTURY BARBARA WATSON ANDAYA 18-J04948 01 Trends_2018-22.indd 3 11/12/18 8:43 AM Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2018 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of State Governments in Malaysia: Institutions, Constitutions and Political Alignment
    ISSUE: 2020 No. 103 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 11 September 2020 The Rise and Fall of State Governments in Malaysia: Institutions, Constitutions and Political Alignment Tricia Yeoh* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Pakatan Harapan-aligned Sabah state government held by Parti Warisan Sabah (Warisan) fell in late July 2020 when 13 state assemblypersons defected to align with former Sabah Chief Minister and Sabah Barisan Nasional chairman Musa Aman. • The Sabah state election will be held on 26 September 2020, ahead of a general election which is widely expected to be called before the end of the year. The outcome of the Sabah state election will therefore carry important lessons for all political parties at the national level in crafting their political strategies. • Historically, political alignment with the federal government seemed to be the most decisive factor in shaping the outcome of state government formation. Nonetheless, the Rulers or governors of respective states have played a crucial role on various occasions, by exercising their discretion on whether it was appropriate to appoint a new Chief Minister or allow the dissolution of a state legislature to hold new elections. The Rulers in turn have to operate within the framework of the state constitutions. • The electoral strategies at state level have become extremely complicated, given the existence of multiple parties, the fluidity of their collective and individual members’ political loyalties, and the ongoing negotiations over leadership and prime ministerial candidacies. *Tricia Yeoh is Visiting Research Fellow at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, CEO of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) and PhD Candidate at the University of Nottingham Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 10760 UNITED KINGDOM of GREAT BRITAIN and NORTHERN
    No. 10760 UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND and FEDERATION OF MALAYA, NORTH BORNEO, SARAWAK and SINGAPORE Agreement relating to Malaysia (with annexes, including the Constitutions of the States of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore, the Malaysia Immigration Bill and the Agreement between the Governments of the Federation of Malaya and Singapore on common market and financial arrangements). Signed at London on 9 July 1963 Agreement amending the above-mentioned Agreement. Signed at Singapore on 28 August 1963 Authentic texts of the Agreement: English and Malay. Authentic text of the annexes: English. Authentic text of the amending Agreement: English. Registered by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 21 September 1970. United Nations — Treaty Series 1970 AGREEMENT 1 RELATING TO MALAYSIA The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore; Desiring to conclude an agreement relating to Malaysia; Agree as follows: Article I The Colonies of North Borneo and Sarawak and the State of Singapore shall be federated with the existing States of the Federation of Malaya as the States of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore in accordance with the constitutional instruments annexed to this Agreement and the Federation shall thereafter be called " Malaysia ". Article II The Government of the Federation of Malaya will take such steps as may be appropriate and available to them to secure the enactment by the Parliament of the Federation of Malaya of an Act in the form set out in Annex A to this Agreement and that it is brought into operation on 31st August 1963 * (and the date on which the said Act is brought into operation is hereinafter referred to as " Malaysia Day ").
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia – Attacks on Justice 2000
    1 Malaysia – Attacks on Justice 2000 Malaysia The Malaysian judiciary, although it generally acts independently, was widely seen to be complicit in political prosecutions by the government, particularly in the trial of former Deputy Prime Minister, Anwar Ibrahim. There were continuing tense relations between the judiciary and the legal profession and there were sustained attacks on the independence of the legal profession by the government. The government instituted sedition proceedings against Karpal Singh, Anwar Ibrahim's defence lawyer, for statements he made in court in the defence of his client. Malaysia continues to act in defiance of the International Court of Justice, by not granting the Special Rapporteur for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers immunity from prosecution. Malaya gained independence from the United Kingdom in 1957. In 1963 the areas of Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore joined to form the Federation of Malaysia. Singapore left the Federation in 1965. The Federation of Malaysia currently consists of thirteen states: the eleven states of peninsular Malaysia and the two states of Sabah and Sarawak on the island of Borneo. Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, headed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, who is elected by the Conference of Rulers for a term of five years. The Conference of Rulers consists of the hereditary rulers of the states of peninsular Malaysia. The current Yang di-Pertuan Agong is Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah who was elected in April 1999. The Constitution embodies the principle of the separation of powers. The legislative power of the Federation is vested in a bicameral parliament consisting of the Senate (Dewan Negara) and the House of Representatives (Dewan Rakyat).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Christopher Rodney Yeoh the Pluralism Project
    Christopher Rodney Yeoh The Pluralism Project Research Report “In these past years of nation-building, we have not become less Malay, less Indian, or less Chinese but we have all become more Malaysian” (Ling Liong Sik, Malaysian Chinese Association, Secretary-General’s Report 1993:9) Malaysia, Truly Asia? Religious Pluralism in Malaysia The slogan “Malaysia, Truly Asia” is commonly heard across the world as part of a large and expensive advertising campaign sponsored by the Malaysian government. It is an attempt to attract foreign visitors to this country of 22 million people which boasts of a highly diverse ethnic and religious composition (Embong 2001, p.59).1 51 percent of the population is Malay, all of whom are Muslim.2 Chinese make up 26 percent of the population; most of whom are Buddhists combining Taoist and Confucian practices while a small number identify as Christian. Indians comprise 7 percent of the population of whom most are Hindu with a small minority of Sikhs, Muslims and Christians. Various ethnic groups, such as different indigenous groups mostly situated in the Borneo region, and Eurasians and migrant workers, most of whom are Indonesians, make up the remaining 16 percent of the population (Peletz 2005, p.243). 1 The campaign has been a tremendous success in terms of its wide coverage and response. Billboards promoting tourism in Malaysia can be seen in soccer stadiums in England, and on highways in Australia and the United Kingdom. The campaign also uses the newspaper and the television to promote tourism. This advertising drive prompted The Hindustan Times, one of India’s largest newspapers to write, “"Malaysia is all set to cash in on its multi-ethnic culture by featuring several Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Sikh and Buddhist houses of worship as the country's premier 'spiritual tourism' destinations” (Press Trust of India 2006).
    [Show full text]