DOCSLIB.ORG

Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 1 Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 1 Breastfeeding Laws Samantha Geiger, Nina Hadley, Silva Stout, Emma Howe, and Shelby Koenig University of North Carolina Wilmington: School of Nursing Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 2 Introduction The benefits of breastfeeding have been discussed for years. Breast milk provides infants with essential nutrients and protective antibodies, and it has also been shown to reduce infants’ risks of ear infections, asthma, atopic dermatitis, gastrointestinal infections, respiratory infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Breastfeeding can also reduce the mother’s risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and type 2 diabetes (Spatz, 2014, pp. 700). The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that mothers breastfeed exclusively for the first six months of life (Spatz, 2014, pp. 700). Also, the Healthy People 2020 objectives aim to have at least 60.6% of all infants receiving some amount of breast milk at six months of age, with at least 25.5% of all infants breastfeeding exclusively at six months of age (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011a). The purpose of this paper is to analyze the background of and barriers to breastfeeding, to discuss the laws implemented to support breastfeeding and the effects of these laws, and to describe the nursing implications of breastfeeding. The paper will also explain the methods used to research breastfeeding laws. Background & Significance At one point in time, breastfeeding was the only option for mothers to feed their children. However, in the 1900s, baby formula was created, and the number of women breastfeeding dropped significantly. In her piece, “Lactivism: Breastfeeding Advocacy in the United States,” Diane Spatz (2014) notes that, “by 1948, only 38% of infants were receiving exclusively human milk feeds at one week of age, and by 1957, only 21% of infants were exclusively breastfed at the time of hospital discharge after birth” (pp. 700). By the late 1900s, physicians were aware of the nutritional and protective benefits of breastfeeding, and as breastfeeding rates dropped, they recognized a decline in the health of infants. As a result, city governments, doctors, and health Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 3 officials campaigned for mothers to continue breastfeeding (Wolfe, 2003, p. 2002). However, barriers to breastfeeding, such as embarrassment, lack of social support, and unsupportive work environments for lactating women, continued to contribute to low breastfeeding rates. In an effort to overcome these barriers and increase breastfeeding rates, legislation was developed to support a mother’s need “to breastfeed outside the home whether at work or in public” (Nguyen and Hawkins, 2012, p. 351). Method Each group member individually researched via a search engine, public record, or academic resource. Together, the group reviewed the literature, and discussed what information would be relevant for use. The group then came to a consensus on what was most important to the breastfeeding policies in North Carolina. Health Source Plus: Nursing/Academic Edition, National Conference of State Legislators, EBSCOhost, and North Carolina Office of State Human Resources were all utilized for research. Literature Review/Analysis In 1993, North Carolina passed legislation that established rights for breastfeeding mothers’ to nurse in any public or private location, protecting them from violating indecent exposure laws. While this legislation provided a supportive environment for breastfeeding mothers, there remained a great need for established breastfeeding rights in the workplace. Many women cite returning to work as a contributing factor for not breastfeeding their children. 66% of mothers return to work three months after giving birth, making it very hard to provide breast milk for their children (Beth, Branch, Holloway, & Sullivan, 2013, p. 2). In fact, research has shown that women who return to work have lower breastfeeding rates 6 months after birth (Brand, Kothari, & Stark, 2011). In order to accommodate working mothers who wish Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 4 to breastfeed their children and to increase the rate of breastfeeding, North Carolina implemented a lactation policy. The North Carolina Office of State Personnel Lactation Policy became effective July of 2010 and requires employers to provide designated space and time for employees to express breast milk. The designated space must be a private, non-restroom location with a door that locks, and it should have electrical outlets (NC Office of State Human Resources, 2010, p. 47). Employers are permitted to require the breastfeeding mother to use their paid breaks, however “if time is needed beyond the regularly scheduled paid break times, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to allow employees to use paid leave or unpaid time for this purpose” (NC Office of State Human Resources, 2010, p. 47). The policy is compliant with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, both of which have nearly identical requirements of employers. Though information on the development and political support of North Carolina’s Lactation Policy is lacking, the provision of the Affordable Care Act that allows nursing mother’s break time to express breast milk was widely supported. Republicans and Democrats both agreed on the provision, and it passed unanimously through the Senate (Jamieson, 2014). Currently, many women in North Carolina are benefitting from the lactation policy. For example, Keri Stepp, a working mother, reported that the lactation policy allowed her to reach her breastfeeding goals and continue her career (Beth, Branch, Holloway, & Sullivan, 2013, p. 4-5). Even though these policies are benefitting women and their children, some supporters feel that the enforcement of breastfeeding laws is weak, and they believe there should be stronger penalties when policies are violated (Nguyen and Hawkins, 2012, p. 357). The economic implications of breastfeeding are also great. A study has shown that “if 90% of U.S. families followed guidelines to breastfeed exclusively for six months, the United States would save $13 Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 5 billion annually from reduced direct medical and indirect costs and the cost of premature death” (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011b, p. 3). Clearly, the legislation is supporting working mothers and encouraging them to continue breastfeeding their children. Discussion Nurses are in the perfect position to provide mothers with the education they need to successfully breastfeed their children. It is imperative to educate new mothers about breastfeeding laws in order to increase awareness about their workplace rights and breastfeeding in public. Nurses may also teach new mothers about the importance and benefits of breastfeeding, and provide patients with breastfeeding resources. Research has shown that there is a relationship between supportive nursing staff and successful breastfeeding, and that the period immediately after birth is vital for influencing breastfeeding practices. (Davis, Stichler, & Poeltler, 2012, p. 469). Therefore, it is important for nurses to remain up to date with current research regarding breastfeeding so that they can provide patients with the best care possible and help increase national breastfeeding rates. Conclusion Although breastfeeding rates are increasing in the United States, only 45% of mothers are providing infants with some amount of breast milk six months after birth (Castillo, 2013). Therefore, even with legislation protecting and supporting breastfeeding women, more needs to be done in order to overcome barriers and increase breastfeeding rates. Unfortunately, many women are unaware of their rights and need to be informed of lactation policies. Nurses play a major role in providing this education to new mothers and supporting their needs. If the Healthy People 2020 goals are met, there will be significant health benefits for mothers and children, as well as substantial benefits for the country’s economy. Running Head: BREASTFEEDING LAWS 6 References Beth, D., Branch, H., Holloway, B., & Sullivan, C. (2013). Eat smart North Carolina: Businesses leading the way in support of breastfeeding. N.C. Division of Public Health, Nutrition Services Branch and Community & Clinical Connections for Prevention & Health Branch. Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://www.nutritionnc.com/breastfeeding/PDFS/ESMMBreastfeedingGuideMedRes.pdf Brand, E., Kothari, C., & Stark, M. A. (2011). Factors related to breastfeeding discontinuation between hospital discharge and 2 weeks postpartum. Journal of Perinatal Education, 20, 36-44. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.20.1.36 Castillo, M. (2013, February 7). CDC: More US mothers are breast-feeding but overall rates still low. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-more-us-mothers- are-breast-feeding-but-overall-rates-still-low/ Davis, S. K., Stichler, J. F., & Poeltler, D. M. (2012). Increasing exclusive breastfeeding rates in the well-baby population. Nursing for Women's Health, 16(6), 460–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2012.01774.x Jamieson, D. (2014, July 24). Dirty bathrooms, no privacy: The horrifying struggles of breastfeeding moms who need to pump at work. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/24/breastfeeding-pumping-at- work_n_5610554.html Nguyen, T. T., & Hawkins, S. S. (2013). Current state of US breastfeeding laws. Maternal & Child Nutrition, (9)3, 350-358. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00392.x
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breastfeeding Selfies and the Performance of Motherhood
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), Feature 1759–1774 1932–8036/2015FEA0002 Virtual Lactivism: Breastfeeding Selfies and the Performance of Motherhood SONJA BOON Memorial University, Canada BETH PENTNEY Nipissing University and Acadia University, Canada Keywords: breastfeeding, publics, selfies, microcelebrity Figure 1. Tea for Two (Boucher, 2014a). Reprinted with permission. Copyright © 2015 (Sonja Boon, [email protected]; Beth Pentney, [email protected] ). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org. 1760 Sonja Boon & Beth Pentney International Journal of Communication 9(2015) “I posted an picture of my body that ‘no one wanted to see’ and if the urge strikes, so should you” (Boucher, 2014c, para. 14). So ends a comment by Sky Boucher, whose tandem breastfeeding selfie “Tea for Two” (Figure 1) went viral in early 2014. Boucher’s comments, which emerged in response to the barrage of both criticism and acclaim elicited by this selfie, suggest that breastfeeding selfies occupy a liminal space and, as such, are not easily integrated into the conventions of selfie culture. Nevertheless, they are also understood by their creators as powerful sites of self-making and community building. In this essay, we examine the politics and production of breastfeeding selfies. We argue that the breastfeeding selfie’s political potential resides at the juncture between sexuality and motherhood. More specifically, it forces mothers (as photographers, subjects, and audience members) and viewers to confront a thorny question: How can one articulate a virtuous maternal self through the lens of what has been broadly understood, within the mainstream media, as a profoundly narcissistic genre? And further, how might breastfeeding—that iconic, embodied practice of motherhood—trouble the very idea of the selfie? To ask these questions, we draw on the notions of socially mediated publicness (Baym & boyd, 2012), microcelebrity (Marwick & boyd, 2011), and networked publics (boyd, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • British Anti-Smallpox Vaccination and the Development of Multifaceted Anti-Vaccine Rhetoric on Internet Parenting Forums Marta B
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2014 Shots, Everybody? : British Anti-smallpox Vaccination and the Development of Multifaceted Anti-vaccine Rhetoric on Internet Parenting Forums Marta B. Bean Scripps College Recommended Citation Bean, Marta B., "Shots, Everybody? : British Anti-smallpox Vaccination and the Development of Multifaceted Anti-vaccine Rhetoric on Internet Parenting Forums" (2014). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 390. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/390 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHOTS, EVERYBODY? : BRITISH ANTI-SMALLPOX VACCINATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIFACETED ANTI-VACCINE RHETORIC ON INTERNET PARENTING FORUMS by MARTA B. BEAN SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR VIVIEN HAMILTON PROFESSOR JACQUELINE WERNIMONT APRIL 25, 2014 Introduction The Internet serves much of the population as an easy way to learn about almost any topic, including health information. Approximately eighty percent of Internet users search for health information online, and surveys indicate that the Internet now rivals physicians as the most common source of health advice. 1 The Internet is also a place where information can be spread quickly and easily. Information is available in many venues, including user-generated Internet forums. Parenting forums are good places for information to spread quickly because of highly dedicated readership and personal connections made on the forums between parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Tandem Breastfeeding: a Descriptive Analysis of the Nutritional Value of Milk When Feeding a Younger and Older Child
    nutrients Article Tandem Breastfeeding: A Descriptive Analysis of the Nutritional Value of Milk When Feeding a Younger and Older Child Elena Sinkiewicz-Darol 1,* , Urszula Bernatowicz-Łojko 1,2, Katarzyna Łubiech 3 , Iwona Adamczyk 1,3 , Magdalena Twaruzek˙ 3 , Barbara Baranowska 2 , Krzysztof Skowron 4 and Diane L. Spatz 5 1 Human Milk Bank, Ludwik Rydygier’ Provincial Polyclinical Hospital in Torun, 87-100 Toru´n,Poland; [email protected] (U.B.-Ł.); [email protected] (I.A.) 2 Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Departament of Midwifery, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Physiology and Toxicology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30 St., 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] (K.Ł.); [email protected] (M.T.) 4 Department of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru´n,Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] 5 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-608-406-360 Abstract: Breastfeeding is a gold standard of feeding of newborns and infants. Tandem breastfeeding (TBF) is feeding two children of different ages at the same time. The knowledge about the composition of human milk in prolonged lactation is still scarce. Milk from tandem breastfeeding women and after weaning was examined. Milk samples were collected from 13 TBF mothers. A 24-h milk Citation: Sinkiewicz-Darol, E.; collection was done. Analyses of fat, protein, carbohydrate and energy content were performed Bernatowicz-Łojko, U.; Łubiech, K.; using MIRIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Experiences of Women Who Breastfeed Long-Term
    EXPLORING THE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN WHO BREASTFEED LONG-TERM Sally Jane Dowling A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences University of the West of England, Bristol September 2013 This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement Acknowledgements My life has been changed in many ways by my experiences of breastfeeding all three of my daughters. The journey that culminates with this PhD began with those three very different experiences and it is dedicated to them, my lovely girls. Breastfeeding the younger two and then undertaking the PhD that grew from that experience would not have been possible without the constant and loving support and patience of Mick. I cannot thank him enough for both of those things. In more recent times the support he has given me to reach the end of this process, both practical and emotional, has been invaluable. My excellent supervision team – Jane Powell, David Pontin and Jennie Naidoo – have been constant in their belief in my abilities and always generous in their support and encouragement. In particular I would like to thank Jane for her interest in me at the beginning, and persistence and faith during the last few months of the work; David for believing in me and making it all possible at the very beginning and Jennie for her support and eye for detail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commodification of Breastfeeding and the New Markets for Breast Milk and Infant Formula
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law Winter 2009 Marketing Mothers' Milk: The Commodification of Breastfeeding and the New Markets for Breast Milk and Infant Formula Linda C. Fentiman Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Linda C. Fentiman, Marketing Mothers' Milk: The Commodification of Breastfeeding and the New Markets for Breast Milk and Infant Formula, 10 Nev. L.J. 29 (2009), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/ 566/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARKETING MOTHERS' MILK: THE COMMODIFICATION OF BREASTFEEDING AND THE NEW MARKETS FOR BREAST MILK AND INFANT FORMULA© Linda C. Fentiman* "You wouldn't take risks before your baby's born. [On screen text as a very pregnant African American woman rides a gyrating mechanical bull. After the woman is thrown off the bull] Why start after? Breastfeed exclusively for 6 months. "1 "The debate about breast-feeding takes place without any reference to its actual context in women's lives. [W]hen people say that breast-feeding is 'free,' I want to hit them with a two-by-four.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Starbucks, 14th arrondissement, Paris: I have arranged to meet a woman called Caroline. I am hoping she might be able to offer a few point- ers on my proposed study of infant feeding practices, comparing rates of breastfeeding and formula feeding in London and Paris. She is a ‘breastfeeding counsellor’ with whom I have been put in touch by a woman in my language class, who described her as ‘the person you need to see in Paris – she knows everything there is to know about breastfeeding’. Naively, I do not approach the meeting as ‘fi eldwork’. Rather, I see Caroline as a potential gatekeeper (to the gatekeepers) to potential participants in my research. A tall, slim, well-groomed woman walks into the café. She is talk- ing to a child in school uniform. I recognise her voice, with its Ameri- can accent, from our phone call, but since she had mentioned she would be bringing her (breastfeeding) son with her, I hesitate – I had been waiting for a woman with a baby. I approach them as they are in the queue, discussing whether the child can have a chocolate dough- nut (his preference) or a bran muffi n (hers). I introduce myself, re- lieved to have found the right person, and we take a seat upstairs. In the course of the next hour, Caroline bombards me with statis- tics. ‘Did you know that 67 per cent of women in France have epi- durals with their fi rst baby? And 47 per cent with their second? Or that there is an 80 per cent episiotomy rate, and 30 per cent C-section rate? They are very into medicalised birthing here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of Maternity, 84 Tenn
    Penn State Law eLibrary Journal Articles Faculty Works 2017 The Rules of aM ternity Dara Purvis Penn State Law Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works Part of the Family Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Dara Purvis, The Rules of Maternity, 84 Tenn. L. Rev. 367 (2017). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RULES OF MATERNITY DARA E. PURVIs* INTRODUCTION. ...................................... ..... 368 I. AUTONOMY WITHIN MOTHERHOOD ................... 371 II. RULE 1: YOUR BODY IS YOUR CHILD'S VESSEL .. ........... 377 A. Drug Use During Pregnancy ................ ...... 379 B. Risks during Pregnancy as Torts ............. ..... 387 C. Self-harm as Child Abuse... .................... 390 D. Keeping the Vessel Alive.................. ....... 391 III. RULE 2: DOCTOR KNOWS BEST ... ...................... 394 IV. RULE 3: MOTHERS MUST ALWAYS PROTECT ....... ........ 402 A. Failureto Protect ......................... ..... 402 B. Failure to ProtectBoth Yourself and Your Child............. 405 C. Failure to Protect and Immigration ................ 409 V. RULE 4: GOOD MOTHERHOOD IS A NARROW ROAD .................. 410 A. The Importance and Danger of Breastfeeding.................. 410 B. Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy/Medical Abuse............ 419 C. Helicopter Versus Free Range Mothering.... ........ 426 VI. RULE 5: ONLY SOME WOMEN NEED APPLY ...... ......... 430 A. PotentialMothers in Prison ................ ...... 431 B. PotentialMothers on Probation .......................... 432 C. PotentialMothers on Welfare............................ 434 D. Free Range Redux- Not if You're Poor.....
    [Show full text]
  • The Commodification of Breast Milk and the Breast Milk Industry By
    The Commodification of Breast Milk and the Breast Milk Industry By Barbara Ann Vocisano, B.A. Hons Carleton University, 2011 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Legal Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011, Barbara Ann Vocisano Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87894-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87894-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • NG194 Evidence Review S
    FINAL Table 18: Excluded studies and reasons for their exclusion Study Reason for exclusion Breastfeeding support lacking in England, RCM News Article. Midwives, 7, 324-324, 2004 Welsh breastfeeding support group launched, News article. Practising Midwife, 10, 13-13, 2007 English hospitals offer poorest hospital News Article. breastfeeding support, Practising Midwife, 7, 9- 9, 2004 Breastfeeding support grants, Practising News Article. Midwife, 5, 9-9, 2002 Bradford pioneers breastfeeding News Article. video...Breastfeeding -- A Gift for Life, RCM Midwives Journal, 1-1, 2001 Midwives needed to assess breastfeeding Letter. advice at Healthtalkonline, Practising Midwife, 16, 7-7, 2013 Abbott, Laura, Scott, Tricia, Women's Not a qualitative study. experiences of breastfeeding in prison, MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 27, 217-223, 2017 Abbott, S., Lay and professional views on health Paper not exclusively about breastfeeding. visiting in an orthodox Jewish community, British journal of community nursing, 9, 80-86, 2004 Afoakwah, Georgina, Smyth, Rebecca, Included studies conducted in the UK were Lavender, Dame Tina, Women's experiences of checked for inclusion in the present review. The breastfeeding: A narrative review of qualitative following studies were excluded (see exclusion studies, African Journal of Midwifery & Women's reason in relevant row of this table): Dykes Health, 7, 71-77, 2013 1999, McFadden 2006, Andrew 2011, Hoddinott 2012. The primary publication of the following study was included in the present review: Dykes 2005. Aiken, A., Thomson, G., Professionalisation of a Population - health care professionals. breast-feeding peer support service: issues and experiences of peer supporters, Midwifery, 29, e145-e151, 2013 197 Postnatal care: evidence review for breastfeeding information and support FINAL (April 2021) FINAL Study Reason for exclusion Albert,J., Breastfeeding: a personal and Feature article, not a study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics and Politics of Breastfeeding
    R O B Y N L E E THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF BREASTFEEDING Power, Pleasure, Poetics This page intentionally left blank ROBYN LEE The Ethics and Politics of Breastfeeding Power, Pleasure, Poetics UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London © University of Toronto Press 2018 Toronto Buffalo London utorontopress.com Printed in the U.S.A. ISBN 978-1-4875-0371-0 (cloth) Printed on acid-free, 100% post-consumer recycled paper with vegetable- based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Lee, Robyn, 1980-, author The ethics and politics of breastfeeding : power, pleasure, poetics/Robyn Lee. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4875-0371-0 (hardcover) 1. Breastfeeding. 2. Breastfeeding – Social aspects. 3. Breastfeeding – Political aspects. I. Title. RJ216 L447 2018 649'.33 C2018-901627-2 This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the financial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council, an agency of the Government of Ontario. Funded by the Financé par le Government gouvernement of Canada du Canada Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 3 1 Breastfeeding, Subjectivity, and Art as a Way of Life 17 Liberal Autonomy: A Bad Fit for Breastfeeding Subjectivity 20 Breastfeeding as an Art of Living
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding Activism (Lactivism) on Facebook
    Mecinska, Lula (2018) Embodied online activism: breastfeeding activism (lactivism) on Facebook. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 11 (2). pp. 21-38. Downloaded from: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4326/ Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria's institutional repository `Insight' must conform to the following fair usage guidelines. Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria's institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that · the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form · a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work · the content is not changed in any way · all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not · sell any part of an item · refer to any part of an item without citation · amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator's reputation · remove or alter the copyright statement on an item. The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing [email protected]. Networking Knowledge 11(2) Communities and the Media Around the Globe (Dec. 2018) Embodied Online Activism: Breastfeeding Activism (Lactivism) on Facebook LULA MECINSKA, Lancaster University, University of Cumbria ABSTRACT Online support communities for people with various health problems and related online activist groups have been the focus of scholarly attention for three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Diane L. Spatz, Phd, RN-BC, FAAN the Helen M. Shearer Professor of Nutrition
    Diane L. Spatz, PhD, RN-BC, FAAN The Helen M. Shearer Professor of Nutrition Contact Information: Home Address: University of Pennsylvania 527 South 27th Street School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA 19146-1012 418 Curie Boulevard Cell Phone: (215) 498-8498 Philadelphia, PA 19104-4217 Telephone: (215) 898-8100 Electronic Mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1995: Doctor of Philosophy University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 1989: Master of Science in Nursing University of Pennsylvania Major: Perinatal Nursing Philadelphia, PA School of Nursing 1986: Bachelor of Science in Nursing University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Other Appointments 2017-2018 Congressional Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women Academic Positions 2013 Frances A. Matsuda Visiting Scholar University of Hawaii at Manoa Nursing 2012 - Present Professor of Perinatal Nursing University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA 2007 Visiting Professor-Curtin University of Technology Perth, Western Australia 2007 Visiting Professor and Research Associate The University of Western Australia Perth, Western Australia Page 1 of 72 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (continued) 2004-2011 Associate Professor of Health Care of Women and Childbearing Nursing University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA 1995-2004 Assistant Professor of Health Care of Women and Childbearing Nursing University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia, PA 1989-1991 Instructor Thomas Jefferson University
    [Show full text]