Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics by Simon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics by Simon M. Freedman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto c Copyright 2015 by Simon M. Freedman Abstract Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics Simon M. Freedman Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto 2015 In this thesis we study jet production at large energies from leptonic collisions. We use the framework of effective theories of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) to examine the properties of jets and systematically improve calculations. We first develop a new formulation of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET), the appropriate effective theory for jets. In this formulation, soft and collinear degrees of freedom are described using QCD fields that interact with each other through light-like Wilson lines in external cur- rents. This formulation gives a more intuitive picture of jet processes than the traditional formulation of SCET. In particular, we show how the decoupling of soft and collinear degrees of freedom that occurs at leading order in power counting is explicit to next-to-leading order and likely beyond. We then use this formulation to write the thrust rate in a factorized form at next-to-leading order in the thrust parameter. The rate involves an incomplete sum over final states due to phase space cuts that is enforced by a measurement operator. Subleading corrections require matching onto not only the next-to-next-to leading order SCET operators, but also matching onto subleading measurement operators. We derive the appropriate hard, jet, and soft functions and show they reproduce the expected subleading thrust rate. Next, we renormalize the next-to-leading order dijet operators used for the subleading thrust rate. Constraints on matching coefficients from current conservation and reparametrization in- variance are shown. We also discuss the subtleties involved in regulating the infrared divergences of the individual loop diagrams in order to extract the ultraviolet divergences. The results can be used to increase the theoretical precision of the thrust rate. Finally, we study the (exclusive) k? and C/A jet algorithms in SCET. Regularizing the virtualites and rapidities of the individual graphs, we are able to write the O(αs) dijet cross ii section as the product of separate hard, jet, and soft contributions. We show how to reproduce the Sudakov form factor to next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy previously calculated by the coherent branching formalism. Our result only depends on the running of the hard function, and we comment that regularizing rapidities is not necessary in this case. iii Dedication To my patient parents and wife iv Acknowledgements I would like to start by giving my sincere thanks to my supervisor Michael Luke, for advising and encouraging me throughout my degree. The work in this thesis would not have been possible without my collaborators: William Man-Yin Cheung and Ray Georke. I would also like to thank Saba Zuberi and Andrew Blechman for teaching me a lot about EFTs during my first few years. As well, I would like to thank my committee members, Bob Holdom and Pierre Savard for keeping me on track, and non-committee member Erich Poppitz for teaching me about the Standard Model. I must also thank my fellow and former graduate students/zombies Catalina Gomez and Santiago Amigo, for many useful discussions and terrible jokes. I would also like to thank my families, both new and old. I owe my new family, the Chiu's, for all their support and great meals throughout the years. My parents, I would like to thank for bearing with me through the long years of wondering when I would finally graduate and my seemingly insane babbling about my research. My sister, I would like to thank for being my best- \man" and for fighting the good fight while I do less practical things. And my grandparents, despite the weekly questions about when I would graduate, I would like to thank them for their strength and passion that I hope I inherited. Finally, I reserve an unimaginable amount of gratitude to my wife Melissa, for her unwa- vering support and encouragment, and an endless energy to keep my spirits high. This work was supported by NSERC and the University of Toronto (and viewers like you). v Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hadronic Jet Physics . 3 1.2 Factorization From Effective Field Theory . 5 1.3 Organization of the Thesis . 7 2 Effective Theories of QCD 8 2.1 Review of Quantum Chromodynamics . 11 2.2 Heavy Quark Effective Theory . 12 2.3 Soft-Collinear Effective Theory . 14 2.3.1 Examples of SCET Currents . 19 2.4 Conclusion . 21 3 SCET, QCD, and Wilson Lines 22 3.1 Introduction . 22 3.2 Label SCET Formulation . 23 3.3 SCET as QCD Fields Coupled to Wilson Lines . 26 3.3.1 Dijet Production at Leading Order . 27 3.3.2 Subleading Corrections to Dijet Production . 31 3.4 Heavy-to-Light Current . 36 3.5 Conclusions . 39 4 Subleading Corrections To Thrust Using Effective Field Theory 41 4.1 Introduction . 41 4.2 Review of SCET . 43 4.3 Leading Order Calculation . 45 4.4 Next-to-Leading Order Calculation . 50 4.4.1 Measurement Operator . 50 4.4.2 Factorization . 53 4.5 Conclusion . 58 4.6 Appendix: Dijet Operators . 59 4.7 Appendix: Jet and Soft Operators . 61 vi 5 Renormalization of Subleading Dijet Operators in Soft-Collinear Effective Theory 70 5.1 Introduction . 70 5.2 SCET and NLO Operators . 73 5.2.1 Constraining the NLO Operators . 77 5.3 Infrared Regulator . 80 5.3.1 The Delta Regulator . 80 5.3.2 Gluon mass . 82 5.4 Anomalous Dimensions . 83 5.5 Conclusion . 88 6 The Exclusive kT and C/A Dijet Rates in SCET with a Rapidity Regulator 89 6.1 Introduction . 89 6.2 Review of Previous Work . 92 6.3 Next-to-Leading-Order calculation . 95 6.4 Next-to-leading logarithm summation . 97 6.5 Discussion . 102 6.6 Conclusion . 103 6.7 Appendix: General Rapidity Anomalous Dimension . 103 7 Conclusion 105 7.1 Future Directions . 106 vii Chapter 1 Introduction The Standard Model describes the strong and electroweak interactions at low energies. Elec- troweak symmetry is spontaneously broken at low energies by the Higgs mechanism resulting in four particles, three of which are Nambu-Goldstone bosons that become the longitudinal modes of the massive weak bosons. The fourth particle is a fundamental scalar called the Higgs boson that couples to massive Standard Model particles with a strength proportional to their mass. Only recently was a scalar particle with the Higgs boson's quantum numbers observed at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) with a mass of 125:36 ± 0:37(stat.) ± 0:18(syst) GeV [1] and +0:26 +0:26 125:02 −0:27 (stat.) −0:15 (syst.) GeV [2] as measured by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations respectively. The discovery of the Higgs boson gives a portal to explore the electroweak sym- metry breaking mechanism. In order to explore this mechanism further, the LHC is increasing the luminosity, and increasing the collision energy from the current 8 TeV to 13 TeV energy. While the increased luminosity and collision energy allows for larger statistics and smaller dis- tance scales to be probed, the large hadronic background in the form of jets will still make precision measurements at the LHC difficult. Improvements in the understanding of jets from the theory side will become more important in order to search for new physics and test the Standard Model. In this thesis, we will study jets in simpler leptonic colliders using effective theory techniques with the future goal of applying this understanding to the LHC environment. The majority of hadron production and interactions occur due to Quantum Chromody- namics (QCD). The Lagrangian of QCD is gauged under SU(3) and describes the interac- tions between coloured quarks and gluons. However, the final states observed at detectors are hadrons, which are colour singlet bound states of the quarks and gluons held together by long distance non-perturbative effects. The discrepancy between the degrees of freedom of the QCD Lagrangian and the observed final states is due to the property of asymptotic freedom. The QCD coupling as a function of energy αs(Q), which describes the strength of the interactions between quarks and gluons, increases at low energy to the point where it is no longer a suitable expansion parameter. The energy scale where the coupling is large enough that the theory becomes non-perturbative is above ΛQCD ≈ 250 MeV in the MS regularization scheme. These non-perturbative effects make theoretical predictions involving QCD interactions challenging. 1 Chapter 1. Introduction 2 Studying large energy quark and gluon production requires understanding the large energy sprays of hadrons called jets. In order to simplify the analysis we will concentrate on high energy lepton collisions, which share many key similarities with hadron collisions for jet production at small distance scales. Leptonic collisions provide a cleaner environment for calculations because effects from parton distribution functions, initial state radiation, and beam remnants are either non-existent or suppressed by the electroweak coupling and can be mostly ignored. The only processes that need be considered at leading order in the electroweak coupling are the large energy collision and the hadronization of the final states. The strategy for calculating jet production is to factorize the different scales in the process. Factorization helps to restore predictive power by separating the long distance non-perturbative physics of the hadronization process, from the various short distance dynamics of the large energy particle collision.