German Policy Towards Europe and the Question of Convertibility

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

German Policy Towards Europe and the Question of Convertibility German Policy towards Europe and the Question of Convertibility Monika Dickhaus Fakultät für Geschichtswissenschaft und Philosophie Universität Bielefeld Postfach 10 01 31 D - 33501 Bielefeld ph.: +49-521-106-3093 Introduction In May 1945 Germany surrendered unconditionally. With this act the Second World War came to a close in Europe and consequently new tasks came into sight. Once the enemy was defeated it was necessary to reconstruct the war-shattered European economies, to stabilize the respective societies and to create an enduring global peace settlement. It was obvious that the terms and conditions of this political and economic peace settlement were to be decided by the Allies. It was evident that Germany would not take part in the respective deliberations. Likewise was it clear that German ideas would not play a decisive role. Being defeated, occupied and destroyed Germany was - above all in the immediate post-war years - in the first place "an issue" only.1 This, however, changed quickly. While the creation of a world economic system proved to be complicated and thus protracted, the Western Zones of Germany or the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG; from 1949 onwards) became in the framework of the emerging Cold War an "occupied Ally".2 In addition, it became clear that Germany was an important economic potential for the European economic reconstruction. Last not least, after World War II there was a strong notion that the mistakes of Versailles, the peace treaty after World War I which had been imposed on Germany and which had poisoned international relations, should not be repeated. All this meant that Germany's goodwill had to be secured and that both Germany and German ideas had to be considered. Thus, over the years the FRG became an ever more important and active, though not yet sovereign, player as regards the questions of a future economic and political peace settlement. In the following I will deal with German ideas and attitudes as regards a future peace settlement. Putting the stress on monetary and economic issues I will analyze German reactions to the proposals put forward in the course of time and I will investigate into the role the FRG and above all its monetary authority, the German Central Bank (Bank deutscher Länder (BdL) until 1957; Deutsche Bundesbank from 1957 onwards) played in bringing about a new monetary and economic order. Since, however, in the post-war period economics and politics were inseparably linked I will also comment on political issues. The paper is structured as follows. First, I will specify the tasks ahead and discuss shortly the plans under consideration and the possible options. Second, I will comment briefly on the historiography of German foreign economic policy, thus putting the following into place. In the main part I will analyze the stance the German Central Bank took when facing the question of a monetary and economic peace settlement. However, I will not only deal with the attitudes of the German Central Bank and thus German financial circles. In addition I will include in the analysis how other circles reacted to the Bank's opinions. Thus I will be able to specify the role the Bank could play inside the German policy making process as well as elucidate the attitudes of other actors which are usually not considered extensively in this respect like for example German industrial circles as represented by the Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie.3 The Tasks and the Options After the Second World War the major task was to remedy the legacy of the war, i.e. to reconstruct the war-shattered European economies, to stabilize the respective societies and to create an enduring peace settlement. However, it was not only the legacy of the Second World War that was on the agenda, moreover, also the legacies of the First World War, of the interwar years and of the world economic crisis had to be tackled. To recall: the First World War had led to the Treaty of Versailles and the severity of this treaty had not only poisoned the international relations but also it had - as his famous critic John Maynard Keynes had warned already in 1920 - hindered German economic recovery and thus had impaired _yet further ... the delicate complicated organisation, already shaken and broken by war, through which alone European peoples can employ themselves and live_.4 Although in the decade after World War I - as Charles Maier has pointed out - bourgeois Europe was "recast" and finally "a discernible equilibrium among economic interests, classes, and nations" had emerged, this stability was superficial and proved to be short-lived only.5 The world economic crisis of the late 1920s and early 1930s made the weaknesses of this settlement crystal-clear, and indeed by 1931 the economic difficulties resulted in a crash of the global monetary and economic system. In summer 1931 Germany introduced foreign exchange controls and in September of the same year the United Kingdom let the exchange rate of the Pound Sterling float freely. In the following years quantitative restrictions were put into operation and competitive devaluations were decided. Be it for the sake of the monetary reserves, be it for the sake of some employment at home protectionist tendencies blossomed and economic bloc-building was pursued. This, however, equaled "international economic disintegration" and was connected with a steep decline in world trade.6 After the war or, more precisely, during the war it was seen as a major task to reconstruct some economic and monetary understanding. On the one hand this system should allow international trade and it should provide some safeguards against protectionist tendencies. On the other hand, however, this system should also protect the mostly scarce monetary reserves and it should not expose industry to a too hard international competition. Furthermore, such a system should allow for reconstruction and modernization while at the same time allowing an economic policy which would take care of the aim 'full employment'. In the course of time several plans which aimed at the establishment of an international economic order fulfilling these requirements were put forward. I would like to comment on these and thus present the three most important options open to the FRG, namely firstly the Bretton Woods System, secondly the OEEC Cooperation and lastly what came to be called European Integration. The first attempts to remedy the legacy of the world economic crisis date back to the early 1940s and focused on the creation of a global monetary system. After lengthy, mainly Anglo-American discussions these endeavors led in 1944 to the Bretton Woods Conference. Here 44 countries agreed to establish a global monetary order based on fixed but adjustable exchange rates, convertibility of currencies, absence of exchange restrictions and an international supervisory authority, the later International Monetary Fund (IMF). Although the Bretton Woods Accord was signed and ratified by the necessary number of countries, the difficulties to realize it became soon obvious. Even after the envisaged five-year-transition-period only a small number of states was willing to accept the obligations laid down in this agreement. Thus, the global multilateral and liberal monetary order as envisaged in the Bretton Woods Accord was irrelevant for the foreseeable future.7 In addition, it must be noted that the concomitant world trade agreement, the International Trade Organization (ITO), on which 53 countries agreed in 1947, soon run into difficulties. While the US Congress refused to ratify this accord, only the provisional General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was put into operation. Although 23 countries accepted with their adherence to the GATT the application of the multilateral most-favored-nation-clause for their tariff policy, once more this episode showed clearly how difficult it was to realize a global economic understanding.8 Having realized the difficulties to erect a global economic system the US started to advocate regional economic cooperation within Europe from 1947 onwards. With George Marshall's speech in Harvard the US offered foreign economic aid on the condition that Europe would cooperate and that Germany would be firmly integrated within this framework of cooperation. This proposal - which came to be called European Recovery Program (ERP) or Marshall Plan - led to the establishment of the Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) in 1948. This intergovernmental framework which was made up of initially 18, later 16 Western European members had the task to distribute the foreign economic aid and to foster regional cooperation. As a result in autumn 1948 a first, and in autumn 1949 a second Intra-European payments agreement were signed. Furthermore, in autumn 1949 the OEEC members agreed on a liberalization program for European trade. As a first step they decided to abolish quantitative restrictions on 50 per cent of private intra-European trade. With the establishing of the European Payments Union (EPU) with which transferability of European currencies was assured and new means of payment were provided it was envisaged to rise this quota to 75 per cent. This regional cooperation had several flaws. Apart from the fact that it was slow in providing concrete results of cooperation, the OEEC trade liberalization program dealt with quantitative restrictions on private trade without affecting the sometimes considerable portion of state trade. Furthermore, it must be pointed out that the OEEC paid no attention to tariff questions. Last not least it must be noted that escape clauses could be applied.9 While the intergovernmental approach as realized in the OEEC fell short from the aspirations of some countries, in spring 1950 the French foreign minister, Robert Schuman, proposed a European Community for Coal and Steel (ECSC). This proposal envisaged the pooling of the resources of the respective sectors and the administration of these resources by a new, supranational High Authority.
Recommended publications
  • The European Payments Union and the Origins of Triffin's Regional Approach Towards International Monetary Integration
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Maes, Ivo; Pasotti, Ilaria Working Paper The European Payments Union and the origins of Triffin's regional approach towards international monetary integration NBB Working Paper, No. 301 Provided in Cooperation with: National Bank of Belgium, Brussels Suggested Citation: Maes, Ivo; Pasotti, Ilaria (2016) : The European Payments Union and the origins of Triffin's regional approach towards international monetary integration, NBB Working Paper, No. 301, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173757 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • Debtors to Balance
    > v, , \\ Albert H. Huntington, Jr. 6621 Gordon .Avtnue Falli Church, V«. 22046 ttA/r'ttdffvO U40U-,'y /\A>W(A?AsiAfr(jMW' -+ v Ao? f- JFW /~rns\/'iAM<i<i<tt/ 0y\ \ I, u <J 3. To oMU<J~ I 0 57 v — / * J-.fa C uwyjziis/ / 'c'a Lremmaw MATNUtOtTlON •M rfMN C« aiO NMM UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum A/AID, Mr. C. Tyler Wood : Hay 4, 1972 : . PPC/SR, Albert H. Huntington', Jr. SUBJECT: Information You Requested on U.S. Assistance to Germany During FY 1946-1952, Germany's Membership in OEEC, EPU, etc. Enclosed are extra copies of the FY 1970 "Green Book" for Governor Harriman, and the FY 1971 preliminary release. We have the complete FY 1971 book in typing now. I have set up a special table showing U.S. aid to Germany by year and program durin? FY 1946-1952, and enclose it. Germany is one of the more complicated situations because of the early postwar relief and GARIOA programs, a part of which were retroactively converted from grant to loan. The Berlin aspect also adds a complication; the notes on the Berlin page in the "Green Book" were reviewed (and amended) by Eleanor Dulles, who handled the Berlin desk in State for several years. Hastily, on other points of interest on which you .wanted help if we could get it in a hurry: 1. A Marshall Flan table is attached, showing Germany in relation to the total and to other recipients. All of these Marshall Plan loans to Germany have long since been repaid.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the European Payments Union for Post-Soviet Currency Arrangements
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Schmieding, Holger Working Paper — Digitized Version No need for a monetary halfway house: Lessons from the European Payments Union for post-Soviet currency arrangements Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 189 Provided in Cooperation with: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Suggested Citation: Schmieding, Holger (1992) : No need for a monetary halfway house: Lessons from the European Payments Union for post-Soviet currency arrangements, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 189, ISBN 3894560282, Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48095 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Jacob J. Kaplan
    Library of Congress Interview with Jacob J. Kaplan The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Foreign Assistance Series JACOB J. KAPLAN Interviewed by: W. Haven North Initial interview date: March 22, 1999 Copyright 1999 ADST Q: March 22, 1999 the interview is with Jacob J. Kaplan. Let's start off with a brief summary of your association with Foreign Assistance and AID. An overview of a career with foreign assistance KAPLAN: My association with foreign assistance goes back to my arrival in Washington in 1943. I was assigned to OSS and put to work evaluating European food supplies. That soon led to moving to London to participate in a Combined Working Party on European Food Supplies, preparing estimates of food the Army would have to bring along to Europe to feed the people. Subsequently, I joined the State Department at the end of the war and quickly became involved in the preparations of the Marshall Plan. I left once the Marshall Plan had been submitted to Congress to take up a position at Yale. I decided after a couple of years that I really wanted to get back into public service. I joined ECA and worked in ECA in Washington and Paris. Then I came back to the State Department, which had taken over the function I was performing in Paris. I was Assistant Coordinator for Program under Douglas Dillon and then George Ball. Then I was a member of the group that put AID together, the President's Foreign Aid Task Force. I then became head Interview with Jacob J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inability of the Bretton Woods Monetary System and the British Search for a New International Economic Framework in the 1950'S
    Working Paper Series E-2012-01 The inability of the Bretton Woods monetary system and the British Search for a new international economic framework in the 1950's Mei Kudo (Institute of International and Cultural Studies, Tsuda College) ©2012 Mei Kudo. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit is given to the source. 1 The inability of the Bretton Woods monetary system and the British Search for a new international economic framework in the 1950’s1 Mei Kudo (Institute of International and Cultural Studies, Tsuda College) Summary How is the reality of the Bretton Woods system and “embedded liberalism” ideology immediately after the Second World War II? What is the meaning of European integration in relation to the international economic regime? To approach these questions, this paper, taking the two UK proposals of floating rate and sterling convertibility – “Operation Robot” and “Collective Approach” – , argues, because of the ineffectiveness of both Keynesian policy and the IMF, in the 1950’s, some of the UK policy-makers try to apply more market-oriented policy to resolve balance of payments crisis, but rejected by those who thought market solution expose the welfare state in danger. This paper also analyses reaction from the continental Europeans. Although they too recognized the limit of the IMF, and Marjolin was even looking for new Atlantic framework, their idea was not corresponded to the “Collective Approach”. What they want was the convertibility through existing EPU framework, which is more reliable and effective than the IMF.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Europe's Growth Prospects
    Western Europe’s Growth Prospects: an Historical Perspective Nicholas Crafts Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy Research Centre, University of Warwick December 2011 Abstract This paper surveys the recent history of Western European growth. It concludes that this experience has been disappointing and that further reforms are desirable in many countries. The requirement for reform comes both from achieving ‘close-to-frontier’ status and from the opportunities provided by the new technological era. The paper goes on to consider the effects that the current crisis may have on medium-term growth rates. The lesson from the 1930s is that, if the current crisis leads to a similarly bad downturn, the policy reaction in terms of greater state intervention will not be conducive to improved growth prospects. Keywords: catch-up growth; general purpose technology; social capability; supply-side policy JEL Classifications: N14; O52 1. Introduction It is well-known that Western European growth performance was lack-lustre from the mid-1990s up to the start of the current financial crisis. This was a far cry from the so-called Golden Age of the early postwar years and was for the average country a period of falling behind rather than catching up the United States. It was a surprise to many that relative productivity performance deteriorated because it appeared that, on the whole, supply-side policy had improved. Yet, while American productivity growth accelerated, European productivity growth slowed down. Of course, since the Golden Age there have been big changes in the global economic environment. Among the most prominent are rapid globalization combined with a new world division of labour associated with the rise of Asia, the advent of a new general purpose technology (GPT) based on information and communication technologies (ICT) and the return of financial crises after a period of unusual stability.
    [Show full text]
  • From Bretton Woods to Brussels: a Legal Analysis of the Exchange-Rate Arrangements of the International Monetary Fund and the European Community
    Fordham Law Review Volume 62 Issue 7 Article 9 1994 From Bretton Woods to Brussels: A Legal Analysis of the Exchange-Rate Arrangements of the International Monetary Fund and the European Community Richard Myrus Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard Myrus, From Bretton Woods to Brussels: A Legal Analysis of the Exchange-Rate Arrangements of the International Monetary Fund and the European Community, 62 Fordham L. Rev. 2095 (1994). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol62/iss7/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM BRETTON WOODS TO BRUSSELS: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXCHANGE-RATE ARRANGEMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY RICHARD MYR US INTRODUCTION Exchange rates represent the price at which the currency of one coun- try can be purchased with the currency of another.t These rates indi- rectly affect the costs of the goods, capital, and services that flow across national borders.2 According to Joseph Gold, former General Counsel of the International Monetary Fund, "[fqor most countries, there is no single price which has such an important influence on both the financial world-in terms of asset values and rates of return, and on the real world-in terms of production, trade and employment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marshall Plan and the Establishment of the OEEC
    The Marshall Plan and the establishment of the OEEC Source: CVCE. European NAvigator. Étienne Deschamps. Copyright: (c) CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_marshall_plan_and_the_establishment_of_the_oeec- en-7cbc25dd-0c8d-49b1-924c-53edb2a59248.html Last updated: 11/05/2021 1/3 The Marshall Plan and the establishment of the OEEC At the end of the war, the United Nations (UN), whose founding Charter was signed in San Francisco in June 1945, provided aid in various ways to the European countries ruined by the war. Europe was faced with serious food shortages and had to maintain various rationing schemes. It was also short of dollars and therefore had to limit imports of civil and military equipment. The United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Agency (UNRRA), founded in November 1943, brought emergency individual aid packages to the European countries, especially humanitarian aid. But this programme was haphazard and would not have much impact on the economy of the entire region. Intra-European trade was hindered by a lack of foreign exchange and required an international authority capable of efectively organising trade worldwide. The United States, whose interests lay in promoting such trade in order to increase its own exports, decided to help the European economy via a large-scale structural recovery programme. The United States wanted to protect American prosperity and stave of the threat of national overproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Payments Union and the Origins of Triffin’S Regional Approach Towards International Monetary Integration
    The European Payments Union and the origins of Triffin’s regional approach towards international monetary integration Working Paper Research by Ivo Maes and Ilaria Pasotti September 2016 No 301 Editor Jan Smets, Governor of the National Bank of Belgium Statement of purpose: The purpose of these working papers is to promote the circulation of research results (Research Series) and analytical studies (Documents Series) made within the National Bank of Belgium or presented by external economists in seminars, conferences and conventions organised by the Bank. The aim is therefore to provide a platform for discussion. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium. Orders For orders and information on subscriptions and reductions: National Bank of Belgium, Documentation - Publications service, boulevard de Berlaimont 14, 1000 Brussels Tel +32 2 221 20 33 - Fax +32 2 21 30 42 The Working Papers are available on the website of the Bank: http://www.nbb.be © National Bank of Belgium, Brussels All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. ISSN: 1375-680X (print) ISSN: 1784-2476 (online) NBB WORKING PAPER No. 301 – SEPTEMBER 2016 Abstract Robert Triffin (1911-1993) played an important role in the international monetary debates in the postwar period. He was known as one of the main advocates of a multipolar international monetary system. In this paper we analyse the origins of Triffin’s “regional” approach towards international monetary integration. We argue that Triffin’s experience with the European Payments Union (EPU) played hereby a crucial role.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-War Reconstruction and Development in the Golden Age of Capitalism
    Chapter II Post-war reconstruction and development in the Golden Age of Capitalism Key messages • The World Economic and Social Survey was an early proponent of development as a process of large-scale struc- tural and institutional change for the promotion of high standards of living, full employment and social progress. Starting from the first edition, issued in January 1948, the Survey recognized the need for coordinated interna- tional action to accelerate economic growth, facilitate the cross-border flow of goods and services and support effective utilization of resources in the context of an expanding and integrated world economy. • The expansion of international trade and a functioning payments system were recognized as two critical factors for development in the post-Second World War period. However, large fluctuations in commodity prices and, cor- respondingly, in foreign exchange earnings were a source of economic instability for many developing countries back then and this has continued to be the case right up to the present. • In the 1950s, the flexibility that European countries were afforded in meeting their International Monetary Fund- related obligations enabled the successful creation of the multilateral international payments system. Six years after the initial commitment, most Western Europe countries had eliminated foreign exchange restrictions and established current account convertibility. A similar flexibility in debt negotiations was important for the facilita- tion of a rapid recovery in Europe in the post-Second World War period as well as in Latin America in the 1930s. • International solidarity has played an important role in development and reconstruction. Western European countries received resources equivalent to 1 per cent of the gross national product of the United States of Amer- ica in the period from 1948 to 1952 through the Marshall Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • German Monetary Policy in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century
    German Monetary History in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century: From the Deutsche Mark to the Euro Robert L. Hetzel tarting in January 2002, citizens of the European Monetary Union (EMU) replaced their national currencies with the Euro, issued by the S European Central Bank (ECB). Europeans created a new pan-European central bank as a symbol of a future united Europe. However, what historical process explains the broad monetary policy of the ECB, that is, its objective of price stability and its strategy for achieving that objective? The short answer is that its founders designed the ECB to look like the Bundesbank. How then did the Bundesbank evolve? To answer that question, I survey German monetary policy in the second half of the twentieth century. I divide this history into three main sections.1 The first treats the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. The second treats the floating exchange rate period that began in 1973. It chronicles the Bundesbank’s ultimate deci- sion to accord primacy to reducing inflation rather than unemployment. The last explains how the Bundesbank dealt with the pressures created by move- ment toward a single European currency. The evolution of the Bundesbank into an institution now identified as a modern central bank is fundamental to the article. A modern central bank This article follows Hetzel (2002), which summarizes German monetary policy in the first half of the twentieth century. The author gratefully acknowledges helpful comments from Michael Dotsey, Martin M. Fase, Andreas Hornstein, Thomas Humphrey, Joachim Scheide, and Alex Wolman. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Aspects of European Monetary Integration After World War II By
    Political Aspects of European Monetary Integration After World War II by Horst Ungerer* Paper presented on Mag 13, 1995. ECSA Conference, Charleston S.C. I. After World War II, an all-encompassing effort was undertaken to eliminate for the future the risk of war between European countries which twice in this century had spread to the whole world. From the beginning, also economic cooperation arid monetary integration were politically motivated--by tying the European countries together in a common institutional framework and by rebuilding their economies in a mutual coordinated effort. The objective was to avert large-scale social misery, in the past a fertile breeding ground for' nationalistic and antagonistic feelings and policies. As the Cold War started to unfold, another important reason was to strengthen resistance to communism in Western Europe. Yet, the history of European economic cooperation and monetary integration is most frequently described and analayzed in economic terms. The expansion of foreign trade and the removal of custom barriers, the elimination of payment restrictions and the granting of credit lines lend themselves more easily to description and analysis in quantitative terms. Improved political cooperation and stability and the overcoming of political rivalry eludes precise analysis. Policies to rebuild the war-shattered economies of Europe concentrated on the onehand on the creation of a world-wide economic order by establishing the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade(GATT), as a stand-in for the never realized International Trade Organization, and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development . (the World Bank) which initially was mainly intended to assist in the rebuilding of the European economies.
    [Show full text]