DOCSLIB.ORG

Caspers Wilderness Park Plants V30 EF-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caspers Wilderness Park Plants V30 EF-2020 Caspers Wilderness Park Plant list Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species infr. sspp-epithet # S ! R I Bryophyta Bryopsida Bryales Bryaceae Bryum ? 1 !! Chlorophyta ? ? ? ? ? 1 !! Marchantiophyta Marchantiopsida Marchantiales Rebouliaceae Asterella californica 1 N Marchantiophyta Marchantiopsida Marchantiales Ricciaceae Riccia trichocarpa 2 ! N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Agave parryi var. ? 1 !! I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Agave vivipara 1 !! I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Chlorogalum parviflorum 2 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. ? 4 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. pomeridianum 2 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Hesperoyucca whipplei 36 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Agavaceae Hooveria parviflora 4 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Amaryllidaceae Allium haematochiton 5 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Amaryllidaceae Allium peninsulare var. ? 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Alismatales Araceae Wolffia columbiana 1 !! N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Arecales Arecaceae Phoenix dactylifera 4 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Arecales Arecaceae Washingtonia robusta 4 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Asparagus asparagoides 1 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Bloomeria crocea var. ? 7 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Bloomeria crocea var. aurea 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Bloomeria crocea var. crocea 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Brodiaea filifolia 2 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Brodiaea jolonensis 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Dipterostemon capitatus ssp. ? 28 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asparagaceae Dipterostemon capitatus ssp. capitatus 11 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Asphodelaceae Asphodelus fistulosus 2 !! I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Commelinales Commelinaceae Tradescantia ohiensis 2 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Carex spissa 2 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Carex triquetra 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Cortaderia selloana 4 !! I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Cyperus eragrostis 5 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Cyperus esculentus var. ? 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Cyperus involucratus 12 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Cyperus niger 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Eleocharis ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Eleocharis acicularis var. ? 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Eleocharis macrostachys 2 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Cyperaceae Eleocharis montevidensis 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Iridaceae Sisyrinchium bellum 21 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus ? 1 S Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus balticus ssp. ater ? 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus bufonius var. ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus bufonius var. occidentalis 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus macrophyllus 3 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus mexicanus 2 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus oxymeris 2 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus phaeocephalus 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Juncaceae Juncus rugulosus 3 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Liliaceae Calochortus catalinae 10 S R N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Liliaceae Calochortus splendens 31 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Liliaceae Calochortus weedii var. intermedius 8 S R N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Liliaceae Calochortus weedii var. weedii 3 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Liliaceae Fritillaria biflora 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Liliales Melanthiaceae Toxicoscordion fremontii 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Asparagales Orchidaceae Piperia unalascensis 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Agrostis pallens 3 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Andropogon glomeratus var. scabriglumis ? 4 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Aristida ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Aristida adscensionis 3 N # = # records; S = specimen vouchered; !! = loc. needs verif.; R = rare; I = Introd. / N = Native 3420 records; 688 taxa, incl. 91 potential duplicates; 366 specimen-vouchered v.30; Emile Fiesler; 06/12/2020 p.1 of 12 Caspers Wilderness Park Plant list Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species infr. sspp-epithet # S ! R I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Aristida purpurea var. parishii 2 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Arundo donax 9 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Avena barbata 5 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Avena fatua 10 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bothriochloa ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bothriochloa barbinodis 4 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Brachypodium distachyon 1 S Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bromus catharticus var. catharticus 1 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bromus diandrus 8 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bromus hordeaceus 3 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bromus madritensis 4 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Bromus rubens 4 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Calamagrostis koelerioides 1 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Cortaderia jubata 1 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Cynodon dactylon 2 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Cynosurus echinatus 1 !! I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Distichlis spicata 3 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Elymus condensatus 7 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Festuca ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Festuca myuros 8 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Festuca perennis 1 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Gastridium phleoides 3 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Hordeum murinum ssp. ? 1 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Hordeum murinum ssp. leporinum 4 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Lamarckia aurea 5 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Melica imperfecta 8 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Muhlenbergia microsperma 7 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Muhlenbergia rigens 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Paspalum distichum 1 N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Pennisetum setaceum 19 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Phalaris aquatica 2 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Poa annua 2 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Polypogon ? 1 Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Polypogon monspeliensis 4 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Polypogon viridis 1 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Schismus barbatus 6 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Sorghum halepense 1 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Stipa coronata 8 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Stipa lepida 4 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Stipa miliacea var. miliacea 1 I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Stipa miliacea var. miliacea ? 2 S I Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Poaceae Stipa pulchra 10 S N Tracheophyta Liliopsida Poales Typhaceae Typha latifolia 4 N Tracheophyta Lycopodiopsida Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella bigelovii 7 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Dipsacales Adoxaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea 15 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus 2 S I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Amaranthus blitoides 1 N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Atriplex semibaccata 2 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Chenopodium album 3 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Chenopodium californicum 7 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Chenopodium murale 4 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Dysphania ? 1 Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Dysphania ambrosioides 1 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Dysphania multifida 1 S I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Salsola australis 2 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Caryophyllales Amaranthaceae Salsola tragus 2 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Malosma laurina 18 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Rhus aromatica 1 N # = # records; S = specimen vouchered; !! = loc. needs verif.; R = rare; I = Introd. / N = Native 3420 records; 688 taxa, incl. 91 potential duplicates; 366 specimen-vouchered v.30; Emile Fiesler; 06/12/2020 p.2 of 12 Caspers Wilderness Park Plant list Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species infr. sspp-epithet # S ! R I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Rhus integrifolia 27 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Rhus ovata 5 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Schinus molle 3 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Sapindales Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron diversilobum 10 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Anthriscus caucalis 4 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Apiastrum angustifolium 6 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Bowlesia incana 4 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Conium maculatum 3 I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Daucus pusillus 9 S N Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Foeniculum vulgare 7 S I Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Apiales Apiaceae Lomatium dasycarpum ssp. ? 3 S
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project
    Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project June 8, 2016 Prepared for: Nichols Road Partners, LLC P.O. Box 77850 Corona, CA 92877 Prepared by: Alden Environmental, Inc. 3245 University Avenue, #1188 San Diego, CA 92104 Nichols Road Mine Project Biological Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description ..............................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS & SURVEY LIMITATIONS .................................................................1 2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................1 2.2 Biological Surveys ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................3 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineations of Waters of U.S. and Waters of the State ....4 2.2.3 Sensitive Species Surveys .........................................................................4 2.2.4 Survey Limitations ....................................................................................5 2.2.5 Nomenclature ............................................................................................5 3.0 REGULATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales
    Kingdom: Plantae Phylum: Tracheophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales, Caryophyllales, Celastrales, Ericales, Fabales, Garryales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Laurales, Magnoliales, Malpighiales, Malvales, Myrtales, Oxalidales, Picramniales, Piperales, Proteales, Rosales, Santalales, Sapindales, Solanales Family: Achariaceae, Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araliaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bixaceae, Boraginaceae, Burseraceae, Calophyllaceae, Canellaceae, Cannabaceae, Capparaceae, Cardiopteridaceae, Caricaceae, Caryocaraceae, Celastraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Ebenaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Emmotaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Goupiaceae, Hernandiaceae, Humiriaceae, Hypericaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Lacistemataceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Lecythidaceae, Lepidobotryaceae, Linaceae, Loganiaceae, Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Malvaceae, Melastomataceae, Meliaceae, Monimiaceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Ochnaceae, Olacaceae, Oleaceae, Opiliaceae, Pentaphylacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picramniaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, Primulaceae, Proteaceae, Putranjivaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Sabiaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Siparunaceae, Solanaceae, Stemonuraceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Violaceae, Vochysiaceae Genus: Abarema, Acioa, Acosmium, Agonandra, Aiouea, Albizia, Alchornea,
    [Show full text]
  • Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of the Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Botanical Name Common Name Habit Family Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple T Sapindaceae Acmispon ? Lotus AH Fabaceae Acmispon glaber var. glaber Deerweed S Fabaceae Acmispon strigosus var. strigosus Strigose Lotus AH Fabaceae Acourtia microcephala Sacapellote PH Asteraceae Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise S Rosaceae Agoseris ? Mountain Dandelion PH Asteraceae Alnus rhombifolia White Alder T Betulaceae Amorpha californica False Indigo S Fabaceae Antirrhinum multiflorum Sticky Snapdragon S Veronicaceae Aquilegia formosa Columbine PH Ranunculaceae Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry Manzanita S Ericaceae Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort S Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Great Basin Sagebrush S Asteraceae Asclepias eriocarpa Woolly Milkweed AH Apocynaceae Astragalus ? Milkvetch AH Fabaceae Avena barbata* Slender Wild Oat AG Poaceae Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat S Asteraceae Boechera arcuata Few-flowered Rock Cress PH Brassicaceae Brickellia californica California Brickellbush S Asteraceae Bromus ? Brome PG Poaceae Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens* Red Brome AG Poaceae Bromus tectorum var. tectorum* Downy Brome AG Poaceae Calocedrus decurrens Incense-cedar T Cupressaceae Calyptridium monandrum Common Calyptridium AH Montiaceae Calystegia malacophylla ssp. cf pedicellata Sierra Morning-glory PH Convolvulaceae Camissonia boothii ssp. decorticans Shreading Evening Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissonia campestris ssp. campestris? Mojave Sun-cup AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis micrantha Tiny Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis pallida ssp. pallida Pale Primrose AH Onagraceae Carex ? Sedge PG Cyperaceae Carex senta Rough Sedge PG Cyperaceae Castilleja ? Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja affinis ssp. affinis Lay-and-Collie's Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja foliolosa Woolly Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja subinclusa ssp. subinclusa Long-leaved Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Caulanthus coulteri var.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Structure of Species' Geographic
    THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF SPECIES’ GEOGRAPHIC RANGES: AN EVALUATION USING THE COSTAL DUNE ENDEMIC CAMISSONIOPSIS CHEIRANTHIFOLIA (ONAGRACEAE) By Adriana López Villalobos A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario Canada June 2017 Copyright © Adriana López-Villalobos, 2017 ABSTRACT The development of molecular techniques has spurred thousands of population genetic studies on a wide variety of plant and animal species. Particularly important, but still relatively rare, are studies that properly test for geographic variation in genetic structure across species’ ranges. This thesis investigates the effects of population density, mating system variation, distance between populations and hybridization on the genetic diversity, differentiation and structure across the range of Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia (Onagraceae). By combining a transplant experiment with microsatellites, I also provide an empirical test of one of the most poorly resolved questions in evolutionary biology: Why do species exhibit limits to their distributions? I developed 24 species-specific nuclear microsatellites loci (nSSR) and used 13 of these and six variable chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSR) to investigate the genetic consequences of the transition from outcrossing to selfing in C. cheiranthifolia. As predicted, small-flowered, selfing populations had lower nSSR diversity (but not cpSSR) than large-flowered, outcrossing populations but they were not more differentiated. The reduction in diversity was greater than the expected from selfing alone, but could not be accounted for by indirect effects of selfing on population density. Five parapatric nSSR clusters and three groups of cpSSR haplotypes usually (but not always) differed in mating system, suggesting that selfing may often initiate ecogeographic isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Acmispon Helleri Notes
    Sorrie, B.A. 2015. Notes on morphology of Acmispon helleri (Fabaceae). Phytoneuron 2015-44. 1–3. Published 15 July 2015. ISSN 2153 733X NOTES ON MORPHOLOGY OF ACMISPON HELLERI (FABACEAE) BRUCE A. SORRIE University of North Carolina Herbarium North Carolina Botanical Garden Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280 ABSTRACT Recent field observations of Acmispon helleri in North Carolina point out a number of discrepancies or omissions regarding published descriptions, including stem color and pubescence, leaflet morphology and vestiture, and corolla color. Degree of foliation strongly corresponds with phenology –– loss of leaves and leaflets over time appears to be common. Acmispon helleri (Britt.) A.A. Heller is the eastern segregate of the western and midwestern A. americanus (Nutt.) Rydb. and is restricted to scattered locations in the piedmont of south-central Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and northeastern Georgia (Weakley 2015). It was formerly placed within Lotus, sometimes as a full species, sometimes as a variety (see Brouillet 2008 and Weakley 2015 for synonymy). Observations of living plants at sites in the lower piedmont of Union County, North Carolina, in 2010 suggest that several morphological characters are at variance with published descriptions. The most detailed description available is that of Wilbur (1963); also very helpful are the illustrations in Chafin (2007). Radford, Ahles, and Bell (1968) followed Wilbur in writing their description. 1. Stem color. Neither Wilbur nor Radford, Ahles, and Bell mention this. In the Union County plants, stems are wholly reddish brown. Branches are green, but often reddish brown basally. 2. Pubescence of stems and branches. Wilbur: stems and branches are "glabrate (especially below) to moderately spreading villous-pubescent." In the Union County plants, stems are sparsely to moderately villous throughout and branches moderately to densely villous.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Monrad Johnson Colletion of Botanical Drawings
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7489r5rb No online items Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings 1914-1941 Processed by Pat L. Walter. Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division History and Special Collections Division UCLA 12-077 Center for Health Sciences Box 951798 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1798 Phone: 310/825-6940 Fax: 310/825-0465 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/biomed/his/ ©2008 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion 48 1 of botanical drawings 1914-1941 Descriptive Summary Title: Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings, Date (inclusive): 1914-1941 Collection number: 48 Creator: Johnson, Arthur Monrad 1878-1943 Extent: 3 boxes (2.5 linear feet) Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library. Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division Los Angeles, California 90095-1490 Abstract: Approximately 1000 botanical drawings, most in pen and black ink on paper, of the structural parts of angiosperms and some gymnosperms, by Arthur Monrad Johnson. Many of the illustrations have been published in the author's scientific publications, such as his "Taxonomy of the Flowering Plants" and articles on the genus Saxifraga. Dr. Johnson was both a respected botanist and an accomplished artist beyond his botanical subjects. Physical location: Collection stored off-site (Southern Regional Library Facility): Advance notice required for access. Language of Material: Collection materials in English Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings (Manuscript collection 48). Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division, University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Rare Plants Report
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report Brand’s Phacelia (Phacelia stellaris) Little mousetail (Myosurus minimus ) 21 April 2020 i 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 2 Protocol Development ........................................................................................................ 2 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................. 2 Training ............................................................................................................................... 3 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 5 Targeted Surveys ................................................................................................................ 5 Species with Additional Requirements ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]