DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 June 2020 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................4 List of Figures .........................................................................................................................................5 List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................................5 2020 — International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe); CAB International (CABI); List of Annexes .......................................................................................................................................5 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and African Union (AU) Preface ....................................................................................................................................................6 This report may be quoted without permission. Please acknowledge the source. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................7 1.0 Concept of invasive species and background to the development of this strategy .....................9 ISBN 978-9966-063-48-9 1.1 Invasive Species vs. Invasive Alien (Exotic) Species .......................................................................9 1.2 Process of Developing the Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa ...............................10 International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) PO Box 30772-00100 Nairobi, Kenya. 2.0 Rationale for developing the strategy for managing invasive species in Africa..........................12 www.icipe.org 2.1Current knowledge and existing frameworks for managing invasive species .................................12 2.2 Progress Towards Managing Invasive Species ............................................................................15 Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) 2.3 Impacts and Implications of Invasive Species in Africa .................................................................16 PO Box 633-00621, Nairobi, Kenya www.cabi.org 2.3.1 Economic impacts .............................................................................................................16 2.3.2 Social impacts ..................................................................................................................17 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) 2.3.3 Environmental impacts .....................................................................................................18 PO Box 30709-00100, Nairobi, Kenya www.iita.org 3.0 Strategic Result Areas and Actions Framework (SRAAF) needed for continent-wide implementation of an effective management of invasive species in Africa .......................................19 African Union Headquarters, 3.1 Vision, Goal and Purpose ............................................................................................................19 P.O. Box 3243, Roosvelt Street W21K19, 3.2 Scope of the Strategy .................................................................................................................19 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 3.3 Overall and Strategic Objectives and Deliverables .......................................................................20 www.au.int 4.0 Implementation plan of SRAAF .....................................................................................................26 4.1 Institutional Engagements for Effective Implementation ..............................................................26 June 2020 4.2 Planning and Implementation of the Strategy ..............................................................................27 5.0 Financing and Resource Mobilization to Support Implementation of SRAAF ............................32 Writing: Paul Nampala Editing: Sunday Ekesi, Roger Day, May-Guri Saethre, Sevgan Subramanian, Ivan Rwomushana, Simplice 6.0 Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning (MEAL) .....................................................32 Fonkou, Fathiya Khamis, Komivi Akutse Design and Layout: Brian Mwashi, Vicky Koech 7.0 Vision of success ...........................................................................................................................33 Cover photo: Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Photo courtesy of G. Goergen, IITA. 2 3 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Acknowledgements List of Figures The process of developing this strategy for managing invasive species in Africa has been championed and Figure 1. A schematic representation of major barriers limiting the spread supported by icipe, IITA and CABI in response to stakeholder demands. icipe, CABI and IITA acknowledge the extensive inputs from AUC, AU-IAPSC, AU-IBAR, NPPOs and many other relevant stakeholders leading to the of introduced plants development of this strategy document.The generous funding support by the Swiss Agency for Development Figure 2. Strategic results chain: Conceptual framework of the Strategy and Cooperation (SDC) to icipe is gratefully acknowledged. CABIs contribution to the development of this for Managing Invasive Species in Africa strategy was through the Action on Invasives programme, with funding support from the UK Department for International Development (DFID) andthe Netherlands Department for International Cooperation (DGIS). Abbreviations and Acronyms List of Tables AU African Union Table 1. Examples of Sub-regional and continental-level frameworks CABI CAB International addressing and/or expected to address invasive alien species CBD Convention on Biological Diversity (IAS) or invasive species (IS) CITES Convention for International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Table 2. Current response of African governments to global strategies DREA Department of Rural Economy and Agriculture on managing invasive alien species (IAS) or invasive species (IS) FAO Food and Agriculture Organization Table 3. Economic losses attributed to invasive species FARA Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa Table 4. Strategic Result Areas and Action Framework (SRAAF) matrix GIASIS Global Invasive Alien Species Information System Table 5. Implementation plan for the first five years (2021-2025) of the strategy for managing invasive species in Africa (2021-2030) GISP Global Invasive Species Programme IAS Invasive Alien Species IBAR Inter-African Bureau of Animal Resources List of Annexes icipe International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Annex 1. Definition of Key Terminologies IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Annex 2. List of some Invasive Species (Various Taxa) recorded in Africa IPPC International Plant Protection Convention Annex 3: The destructive impacts of invasive plant species at a glance IAPSC Inter-Africa Phytosanitary Council Annex 4: International agreements ratified by African governments IS Invasive Species Annex 5: Policy frameworks developed outside Africa in response to Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG global strategies for managing invasive species IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature Annex 6: Synthesis of Key International and Regional Instruments NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan R4D Research for Development SPS Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures SSA Sub-Saharan Africa UN United Nations UNEP United Nations Environment Programme WHO World Health Organization WTO World Trade Organization 4 5 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa 2021–2030 Preface Executive Summary Invasive species pose a huge global threat, both in terms of biodiversity and the Invasive species destroy livelihoods, cause hunger, threaten the economic prosperity of cost to economic activities such as agriculture, trade, tourism and development. entire countries and regions, and increase biodiversity loss. The increasing frequency Invasive species disproportionately affect communities in poor rural areas; people who of invasions of invasive species in Africa suggests that many countries lack adequate depend on natural resources and healthy ecosystems to make a living. For example, capacity to detect and implement management measures. To effectively address invasive insect pests and diseases can significantly affect agricultural productivity and the invasive species menace in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a shift in strategy from a production. An invasive weed can take over agricultural land and outcompete food and reactive to a more proactive intervention is urgently needed to be adopted based on feed crops for limited resources. Invasive species can also harm the health of people in the internationally recognised three-stage approach of prevention, early detection, and infected areas. This can be both direct (allergies, interaction with disease vectors) and control. indirect (reduced agricultural productivity). A proactive, effective approach for managing national circumstances, for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dwarf-Cashew Resistance to Whitefly (Aleurodicus Cocois) Linked To
    Research Article Received: 12 February 2019 Revised: 14 June 2019 Accepted article published: 25 June 2019 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 27 July 2019 (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI 10.1002/ps.5531 Dwarf-cashew resistance to whitefly (Aleurodicus cocois) linked to morphological and histochemical characteristics of leaves Elaine SS Goiana,a Nivia S Dias-Pini,a* Celli R Muniz,a Arlete A Soares,b James C Alves,b Francisco C Vidal-Netoa and Cherre S Bezerra Da Silvac Abstract BACKGROUND: The cashew whitefly (CW), Aleurodicus cocois, is an important pest of cashew in Brazil. The use of resistant plants may be an effective strategy for the control of this pest. In a preliminary assay, we found that dwarf-cashew clones show different levels of resistance to CW. Here, we hypothesized that such resistance is associated with morphological characteristics of cashew leaves and their content of phenolic compounds. RESULTS: We determined (i) the attractiveness and suitability for oviposition of five dwarf-cashew clones towards CW, (ii) the leaf morphology and chemistry of those clones, and (iii) the relationship between leaf characteristics and resistance to CW. In greenhouse multiple-choice assays, PRO143/7 and CCP76 showed, respectively, the lowest and highest counts of both CW adults and eggs. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed that PRO143/7 and EMBRAPA51 have, respectively, the highest and lowest numbers of leaf glandular trichomes. We found a negative correlation between number of trichomes in the abaxial surface of cashew leaves and CW oviposition. In addition, confocal microscopy analysis and histochemical tests with ferrous sulfate indicated a higher accumulation of phenolic compounds in the resistant clone PRO143/7 relative to the other clones.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Pest Management of Spiraling Whitefly
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRY AND RESOURCES Biology and pest management of spiraling whitefly Deanna Chin1, Haidee Brown1, Lanni Zhang, Michael Neal1, Brian Thistleton1 and Stuart Smith2 Entomology, Plant Industries1, Biosecurity and Product Integrity2 Background and distribution Spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus is native to the Caribbean region and Central America. The pest is also found in the USA (southern Florida), West Indies, South America, Africa, the Canary Islands, Hawaii, Samoa, the Maldives, Cook Islands, Fiji, Guam, Micronesia, Nauru, Taiwan, India, Sri Lanka, Papua New Guinea, South East Asia and Torres Strait. In Australia, the pest is established in coastal Queensland from Mackay to Cape York was first detected in Darwin in March 2006. Spiraling whitefly has now been recorded from many localities in Darwin, Palmerston, Darwin rural including, Howard Springs, Virginia, Bees Creek, Noonamah, Humpty Doo, Girraween, Berry Springs, Wagait Beach (Cox Peninsula), Adelaide River, Batchelor, Pine Creek, Jabiru and Katherine. It has not been detected from Nhulunbuy or Alice Springs. Appearance Spiraling whitefly is a small sap sucking insect which is related to mealybugs and aphids. To the naked eye, the adults look like a very small moth and have a body length of about 2 mm. The wings of the adults are plain white or occasionally have pale or dark spots on the forewings. Eggs are elliptical and yellow to tan in colour, 0.3 mm long and are laid singly at right angles to the leaf veins and associated with irregularly spiraling deposits of white flocculent wax. This spiraling effect is usually on the undersides of leaves but in heavy infestations the spirals may also be seen on the upper surface of leaves as well as fruit and non plant material.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliable Molecular Identification of Nine Tropical Whitefly Species
    Reliable molecular identification of nine tropical whitefly species Tatiana M. Ovalle1, Soroush Parsa1,2, Maria P. Hernandez 1 & Luis A. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle1,2 1Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Km 17, Recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Colombia 2CGIAR Research Program for Root Tubers and Bananas, Lima, Peru Keywords Abstract COI, RFLP-PCR, Tropical whiteflies, Molecular identification. The identification of whitefly species in adult stage is problematic. Morphologi- cal differentiation of pupae is one of the better methods for determining identity Correspondence of species, but it may vary depending on the host plant on which they develop Luis A. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Centro which can lead to misidentifications and erroneous naming of new species. Poly- Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) merase chain reaction (PCR) fragment amplified from the mitochondrial cyto- Km 17, Recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Colombia. chrome oxidase I (COI) gene is often used for mitochondrial haplotype Tel: +57 2445 0000; Fax: +57 2445 0073; E-mail: [email protected] identification that can be associated with specific species. Our objective was to compare morphometric traits against DNA barcode sequences to develop and Funding Information implement a diagnostic molecular kit based on a RFLP-PCR method using the This should state that the CGIAR Reseach COI gene for the rapid identification of whiteflies. This study will allow for the Program for Root Tubers and Bananas rapid diagnosis of the diverse community of whiteflies attacking plants of eco- provided the resources to do this work. nomic interest in Colombia. It also provides access to the COI sequence that can be used to develop predator conservation techniques by establishing which Received: 4 April 2014; Revised: 20 June predators have a trophic linkage with the focal whitefly pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Performance of Spiralling Whitefly on Guava and Impact of Weather Parameters on Its Immature Stages
    SAARC J. Agri., 15(2): 207-214 (2017) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/sja.v15i2.35165 Short Communication REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF SPIRALLING WHITEFLY ON GUAVA AND IMPACT OF WEATHER PARAMETERS ON ITS IMMATURE STAGES I. Hossain, M.M.H. Khan* and S.M.H. Jahan Department of Entomology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh ABSTRACT The study was conducted to know the reproductive performance of spiralling whitefly on guava. Number of colony, eggs, 1st instar, 2nd instar, 3rd instar and 4th instar nymphs per five leaves ranged from 6 to 15, 8 to 32, 0 to 44, 0 to 22, 0 to 45 and 0 to 28, respectively. Maximum number of adults and nymphs were found in the month of January. Highest longevity of Aleurodicus dispersus (21.5 days) was recorded in adult while the lowest was in 2nd instar nymph (6.4 days). The number of colony/leaf and number of 3rd and 4th instar nymphs of A. dispersus had significant positive correlation with minimum and maximum temperature while non-significant positive correlation is observed between the number of egg/colony, the number 1st and 2nd instar nymphs with minimum and maximum temperature. A. dispersus showed non- significant positive correlation with minimum and maximum relative humidity regarding number of colony/leaf, 2nd instar nymph while non- significant negative correlation with 4th instar nymph. Key words: Aleurodicus dispersus, reproductive performance, life span, weather parameters INTRODUCTION Guava is grown in all the districts of Bangladesh and in many other Asian countries. The major areas of guava cultivation are the Gazipur, Barisal and Jessore districts of Bangladesh where successful production is achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiralling Whitefly (025)
    Pacific Pests, Pathogens and Weeds - Online edition Spiralling whitefly (025) Common Name Spiralling whitefly Scientific Name Aleurodicus dispersus. A member of the Aleyrodidae. Distribution Asia, Africa, North (Florida, Hawaii), South and Central America, the Caribbean, Europe (restricted), Oceania. It is recorded in Australia, American Samoa, Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Caledonia, Northern Marianas Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, and Vanuatu. Photo 1. Spirals of eggs and wax, made by the Hosts spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus. Spiralling whitefly has a very wide host range, including banana, cassava, citrus, papaya, mango, custard apple, guava, taro, tomato, capsicum, eggplant and also many ornamental species, shade trees and weeds. The adult makes distinctive spiralling patterns when laying eggs on the under surface of leaves or on fruits; this gives the insect its name. Symptoms & Life Cycle Damage is caused by the whitefly piercing the leaf and sucking the sap; this leads to early death when whitefly numbers are high. Damage is also caused by build-up of sooty mould (see Fact Sheet no. 51). Sooty moulds (fungi) grow on the honeydew produced by the whiteflies and their nymphs as they feed. The mould weakens the leaves, as they cannot get sufficient sunlight for normal growth. The eggs are smooth, yellow to tan, oval, 0.3 mm long. They are laid in a spiral pattern within a trail of white wax (Photos 1-3). The eggs hatch after 7-10 days. Photo 2. Spirals of eggs and wax on the fruit of papaya made by the spiralling whitefly, After hatching, crawlers (nymphs or larvae) move to the leaf veins to feed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of on Aleurodicus Dispersus Russel. (Spiralling Whitefly) [Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae] in Nigeria
    Journal of Entomology and Nematology Vol. 2(1), pp. 001-006, February, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JEN ISSN 2006- 9855© 2010 Academic Journals Review A review of on Aleurodicus dispersus Russel. (spiralling whitefly) [Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae] in Nigeria A. D. Banjo Department of Plant science and applied zoology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, P. M. B. 2002, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 26 November, 2009 The developmental biology of Aleurodicus dispersus Russel., have been investigated. It was found to have a cumulative developmental period of (23 - 41) days. The mean numbers of egg developing to adult have been found to be 138.1 per thousand eggs. The spread of the insect have been found to be connected to human traffics. The oviposition and feeding occurs simultaneously and occur more on their abaxial surface of host leaves. Rainfall and temperature play a prominent role on the abundance and seasonal fluctuation of the insect and infact, regulating their population. Presently, A. dispersus is found on arable as well as ornamental plants but rarely on gramminae. At present, A. dispersus is a minor pest with the potential of becoming a serious pest with the increasing global warming. Key words: Aleurodicus dispersus, oviposition, abaxial surface, abundance, gramminae. INTRODUCTION Aleurodicus dispersus (Russel, 1965) otherwise known cowpea (Waterhouse and Norris, 1989). Altogether, A. as spiralling whitefly (swf) is a small (1 - 2 mm long) dispersus has been reported on more than 27 plant insect as other whiteflies (Avidov and Harpaz, 1969) with families, 38 genera with over 100 species including citrus a characteristic spiralling pattern of oviposition on the and ornamental plants (Russell, 1965; Cherry, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Invasive Rugose Spiralling Whitefly Aleurodicus Rugioperculatus Martin on Three Host Plants
    20038--Sanjay Kumar Pradhan Indian Journal of Entomology, Review Article (2020) DoI No.: COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF INVASIVE RUGOSE SPIRALLING WHITEFLY ALEURODICUS RUGIOPERCULATUS MARTIN ON THREE HOST PLANTS SANJAY KUMAR PRADHAN, A N SHYLESHA1, K SELVARAJ*AND SUMALATHA, B V1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560065 1Division of Germplasm Conservation and Utilization, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insects Resources, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560024 *Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT Comparative biology of invasive rugose spiralling whitefly (RSW) Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) was studied on three host plants viz., coconut (Cocos nucifera L), banana (Musa spp. L) and Indian shot (Canna indica) under caged as well as field conditions. The RSW life cycle was shorter on coconut compared to that of banana and Indian shot plant. Thus coconut is preferred hosts for its growth and development. A fecundity of 49.50± 4.09 and total duration of the nymphal instars being of 23.2± 1.38 days. Duration to lifestages on banana was less under field conditions as compared to that under caged conditions.These results on the comparative biology and growth will help to develop suitable IPM strategies for this invasive pest. Key words: Aleurodicus rugioperculatus, biology, coconut, banana, Canna indica, fecundity, nymphal instars, duration, total life cycle Globalization in agriculture trade has led to deliberate and Andhra Pradesh. Due to its excreting excessive or accidental introduction of many quarantine pests, honey dew, which gets deposited on plant leaves as well diseases and weeds (USDA, 2001). These introduced as anything under the infested plants, its damage is more pests pose major threat to the native biodiversity and serious.
    [Show full text]
  • Menace of Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus Dispersus Russell on the Agrarian Community
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(12): 2756-2772 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 12 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.329 Menace of Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell on the Agrarian Community P. P. Pradhan1* and Abhilasa Kousik Borthakur2 1Department of Entomology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, India 2Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Assam Agricultural University, Darrang, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT K e yw or ds Spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell, a polyphagous pest native to the Spiralling whitefly, Caribbean region and Central America has turned out to be cosmopolitan as well Aleurodicus creating havoc to the farming community. The peculiar egg-laying pattern of this pest disperses, has given its name spiralling whitefly. The insect has four nymphal stages and has a Polyphagous, pupal period of 2-3 days, thereby the total developmental period is of 18 to 23 days. It Ecology, Parasitoids, has been found that high temperature and high relative humidity during summer has a positive impact on pest incidence. As their body is covered with a heavy waxy Predators material, management of this pest is quite a task. Since A. dispersus is an exotic pest Article Info in most of the countries, hence classical biological control through the introduction of natural enemies from the area of origin of the pest is considered as a sustainable Accepted: management option. The natural enemies chiefly the parasitoids Encarsia 18 November 2020 guadeloupae Viggiani and Encarsia haitiensis Dozier has turned out to be a promising Available Online: 10 December 2020 tool in suppressing the menace of spiralling whitefly.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Predation Potential of Coccinellids on Cassava Whiteflies
    Vol. 5(7), pp. 84-87, December 2013 DOI: 10.5897/JEN2012.022 Journal of Entomology and Nematology ISSN 2006-9855 ©2013 Academic Journals http://www.academicjournals.org/JEN Full Length Research Paper Evaluation of predation potential of coccinellids on cassava whiteflies 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 H. Atuncha , E. Ateka R . Amata *, R. Mwirichia , M. Kasina , B. Mbevi and E. Wakoli 1Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), P. O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya. 2Kenya Agricultural Research Institute/National Agricultural Research Laboratories, P. O. Box 14733, 00800 Nairobi, Kenya. Accepted 29 October, 2013 Two whitefly species namely Bemisia tabaci and Aleurodicus dispersus are common cassava pests in Kenya. As direct feeders on the phloem contents and vectors of viruses, whiteflies cause significant damage to the cassava crop in Kenya. This study aimed at evaluating the potential of coccinellidae beetles (Chelomenes vicina, Diomers flavipes, Diomers Hottentota, and Coccinella septempunctata) as predators of whiteflies. The predation potential of these predators was evaluated using nymphs of B. tabaci and A. dispersus under ‘choice’ and ‘no choice’ feeding conditions. The number of nymphs consumed by each individual predator was recorded after 24 h. Data collected from the ‘no choice’ and the ‘choice’ feeding experiments were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and paired-sample T-test, respectively. When the predators were exclusively provided with nymphs of B. tabaci, the number of nymphs consumed by the ladybird species was significantly (P<0.05) different. D.flavipes consumed the highest number of B. tabaci nymphs with a mean number of 79.4±1.1 nymphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Living World 2005 Issue.Indd
    Bioecological Studies on the Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Trinidad and Tobago V. F. Lopez, M. T. K. Kairo, P. Bacon and A. Khan Lopez, V.F., Kairo, M.T.K., Bacon, P., and Khan, A. 2005. Bioecological Studies on the Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Trinidad and Tobago. Living World, Journal of The Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club , 2005, 15-22. Bioecological Studies on the Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Trinidad and Tobago V. F. Lopez1, M. T. K. Kairo1, P. Bacon2* and A. Khan2 1. CAB International Caribbean and Latin America Regional Centre, Gordon Street, Curepe, Trinidad and Tobago. 2. Life Sciences Department, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Laboratory and field studies were carried out to elucidate the biology and ecology of indigenous species of Aleurodicus ((Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and other aleurodids in Trinidad and Tobago. Data are presented on the lifecycle of three commonly occurring whiteflies in Trinidad (Aleurodicus cocois (Curtis), Aleurodicus pulvinatus (Maskell) and Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell)) under constant temperature conditions in the laboratory. Males of all three spe- cies generally developed faster than females. Aleurothrixus floccosus developed faster than the two Aleurodicus spp. and oviposited the highest number of eggs per female. Egg hatch ranged from 85% in A. floccosus to 88% in A. cocois. Distinguishing features of the three species are described. During field surveys, several Aleurodicus species known to occur in Trinidad were encountered together with two undescribed aleurodicine species (Aleurodicus sp. and Lecanoideus sp.). One new country record (Aleurotrachelus atratus Hempel) and 13 new host plant records were also established.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 INVASIVE PESTS and CASI. a MANUAL for EXTENSION Agriculture Production Systems Based in Conservation Agriculture
    INVASIVE PESTS AND CASI. A MANUAL FOR EXTENSION Agriculture Production systems based in conservation agriculture (CASI) and others are being threaten by a massive introduction and colonization of exotic pests (FAO). Climate change in the planet, globalization and the moderns transport systems and human mobility are in part related with this outbrake of exotic pests. This pests are responsible for the degradation of agriculture systems, affecting somehow public health and the social and economic environment. According with the African Development Bank (AfDB), more than 160 million Africans live in food insecurity and malnutrition. Around 32 millions of children from 0 to 5 years old are beyond the weigh, in this approximately 10 million in severe situation. Beside that the agriculture employs 50 to 70% of the labour in Africa, but only produces 25% of the gross domestic product. This is not only associated with the low use of technology in agriculture but is mainly because of the impact of biological invasions in the agriculture systems. Mozambique is also in the list of this sad African reality in agriculture. Just to clarify, since 1980, more than 20 exotic species of invasive pests were introduced with big consequences in agriculture. More recently the following pests appear: fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) (2007), Banana Fusarium Wilt (FOC TR4) (2013), “Banana top bunchy virus” BBTV (2015), tomato leafminer Tuta abosoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) (2016) and Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (2017) (Vala et al., 2018; Cogala, 2017). Fall Armyworm (FAW) is the main concern for the maize farmers that work with conservation agriculture (CABI, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]