Cessfully Resolving Native Title Claims Through Litigation, Mediation Or

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cessfully Resolving Native Title Claims Through Litigation, Mediation Or cessfully resolving native title claims through ‘seat at the table’ in relation to future devel- litigation, mediation or settlement. opments and negotiations. After emphasising these seemingly positive Briefly, the role of the Federal Government is developments in native title, the Report goes described as ‘significant’, noting the $86 mil- on to address the CERD criticisms regarding lion increase in funding for the native title sys- the 1998 amendments to the NTA and the tem to “enhance its efficient operation”. effective participation of Indigenous people Details of the Federal and State Government’s in decisions that affect their land rights. The role in opposing native title claims are not Report focuses on the Parliamentary Joint mentioned nor are any details as to where the Committee – asked in 1999 to report on Aus- $86 million went. In fact, the 2001 Native Ti- tralia’s obligations under CERD and the tle Report by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait amended NTA – and their findings that “the Islander Commissioner found that most of the amended Native Title Act is consistent with $86 million went to the Attorney General, the Australia’s obligations under the International NNTT, the Federal Court and away from the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Ra- NTRB’s – whose primary role it is to protect cial Discrimination”. The Federal Government, native title. both at the time of the initial concerns and in the present Report, argue that the amend- In summary, the Report defends the state of ments maintain “an appropriate balance be- native title in a fairly partial manner. The criti- tween the rights of native title holders and cisms and concerns of the CERD Committee the rights of others” (Report, p27). Further are either not explored in any detail or are jus- highlighting the tension between interna- tified on the basis that they provide ‘certainty’ tional and domestic law, the Report quotes (the fact that this comes at the cost of Indige- from the PJC Report finding that “national nous rights seems to be the whole point of institutions are best placed … to find a bal- CERD concerns but this is not addressed). ance between a range of competing interests” There are no formal structures in international (PJC Report, p9). law that can force Australia to comply with the recommendations of the CERD Committee. In response to the CERD Committee’s con- However, given the right political climate, the cern that Indigenous people are not effec- findings of the Committee have the potential tively participating in decisions that affect to influence government policy and legislation their rights, the Report quotes from the Par- in an informal way. Unfortunately, the Report liamentary Joint Committee on Native Title’s indicates the reluctance of the current Federal findings that political rights in international Government to be swayed by international instruments do not give rise to a right to par- concerns, even where those concerns are le- ticipate in political processes in a specific fash- gitimate, and its determination to continue ion, it is only a general right. The Report also with its policies regardless of international dis- points to ILUA provisions as the means approval. through which Indigenous people have a NATIVE TITLE IN THE NEWS New South Wales vice stated that the fire was in breach of regulations and had to be extinguished. West A Wiradjuri traditional owner and Police Wyalong, pg 3. 07 November 2003. Wiradjuri came into conflict when Police extinguished claim: NC02/3, N6002/02. a fire at a protest camp near Lake Cowal. According to Mr 'Chappie' Williams, it was a sacred fire and he was asserting his native Bega Valley Shire Council was recently title rights to practice his religion on the awarded 'Council of the Year' as a result of land. A representative of the Rural Fire Ser- their Memorandum of Understanding with Native Title Newsletter No.4/2003 8 the local Indigenous people. The award was only native title pearling agreement in the accepted by Mayor David Hede, councils territory, was signed with the company corporate and community services director Broome Pearls during a ceremony on Croker Leanne Barnes and council's Aboriginal Island. The agreement follows the 2001 community development officer, Kerry High Court decision which upheld the exis- Avery. Ms Avery said the council had been tence of native title rights over the sea and commended on the fact that the Memoran- seabed in the Croker Island claim area. It dum was a 'living document' which was to clears the way for the pearling company to be reviewed and changed regularly. The establish pearl farming operations free of council, the shire's three local Aboriginal native title concerns, and recognises tradi- land councils and native title holders signed tional owners’ rights to ensure the environ- the memorandum in June 2001. News Weekly ment and sacred sites are protected. Barrier (Merimbula), pg 2. 12 November 2003. Daily Truth (Broken Hill), pg 9. 19 November 2003. Croker Island claim: DC94/6, DG6001/96. In a historic vote, Newcastle City Council in NSW became the first local government au- thority in Australia to formally recognise the A central Australian Aboriginal group has dispossession of Aboriginal peoples. The recently signed an Indigenous land use council voted to adopt an official statement agreement (ILUA) with Gold explorers in acknowledging the continuing occupation of the region. This agreement is the 100th the Newcastle area by Awabakal and Worimi ILUA registered with the National Native peoples to be read at council meetings and Title Tribunal (NNTT). The agreement be- all major civic events. The council stated it's tween Newmont Gold Exploration, Nor- decision to acknowledge the continuing rela- mandy NFM and the Central Land Council tionship of Indigenous peoples to their land allows for exploration and mining in the despite dispossession reflects an ongoing Northern Territory, in the north-west of commitment to reconciliation. Koori Mail pg Barrow Creek. This agreement will enable 25. 19 November 2003. native title claimants to settle land use issues with developers and governments without court action. National Indigenous Times, pg 13. The Twofold Bay Indigenous group has re- 26 November 2003. Barrow Creek ILUA: cently lodged a native title claim at Eden DI2003/09. over New South Wales coastal waters. The National Native Title Tribunal has written to over 1,500 people and organisations, includ- Queensland ing commerical fishermen and women, char- ter boat licence holders and others with An Indigenous Land Use Agreement commerical interests, informing them of the (ILUA) has been signed by the Ewamian claim. Any person or group who has an in- people and the QLD State government over terest that will be affected, has until 02 the township reserves of Georgetown, March 04 to apply to the Federal Court. Bega Einasleigh, Forsayth and Mt Surprise. The District News, pg 11. 05 December 2003. agreement signed is the first of its kind in Twofold Bay claim: NC03/1, N6001/03. Australia for addressing native title over a number of towns with a shire. Etheridge Shire Council assisted in the process, which Northern Territory Mayor John Smith described as very posi- tive. Cr Smith said the ILUA provides own- Aboriginal traditional owners have signed a ership certainty for council infrastructure landmark agreement handing them a stake in and removes obstacles to land purchases a Northern Territory pearl farming opera- within town reserves. The Ewamian People tion. The four-year agreement, the first seas initiated discussions to support local devel- opment opportunities and to foster working Native Title Newsletter No.4/2003 9 relationships with Etheridge Shire Council The Queensland Government claims to while improving access to traditional lands. have cleared the backlog of mining explora- Part of the State Government's commit- tion permits in the state, although hundreds ments under the agreement is the creation of are still to be processed. Permits for mining reserves for Aboriginal and cultural purposes exploration were frozen after the High in Mt Surprise, Einasleigh and Forsayth. Court's Wik decision in 1996, which found North Queensland Register, pg 3. 06 November native title was not extinguished by leasehold 2003. Ewamian claim: QI2003/048 land. Mines Minister Stephen Robertson said the Government, Indigenous groups and the mining industry needed to co-operate to get The Gangulu people and Anglo Coal signed exploration moving. More than 200 applica- an agreement recently over the management tions were approved in the past six months of Aboriginal cultural heritage areas at Anglo and 106 in the six months prior to that, with Coals proposed mining sites. The agreement more than 300 exploration permits to still be followed months of negotiations between processed. Courier Mail, pg 31. 26 November the Gangulu people, the traditional owners 2003. of the lower Dawson and Callide Valleys and the mining company. The agreement will ensure the Gangulu people's cultural heritage The Kauareg people are the traditional own- will be managed in culturally appropriate ers of the southern Torres Strait Islands, and ways in areas including exploration, mine hold native title over seven. The region is development, mitigation and post- slowly moving towards self-government. construction. Central Telegraph (Biloela), pg 5. Some Kaurareg people are unhappy with 07 November 2003. what they say are moves to declare Torres Strait autonomy over their land. A newly formed group called the Cape York Bound- A dispute has emerged between the Queen- ary Interim Committee (CYBIC) also want a sland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) boundary change to make the islands part of and Fraser Island Indigenous groups over Cape York. Kaurareg people spokesperson new access permits to Fraser Island. The Isaac Savage said Aboriginal traditional Dulungbara, Ngulungbara and the majority owners should not be represented by Is- of the Batchala people have authorised the lander people.
Recommended publications
  • A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I Acknowledge and Offer M
    A Native Title Information Talk Delivered at Fernvale Futures on 22 February 2014. Tim Wishart Slide 1 I acknowledge and offer my respect to the country on which we meet and to the Traditional Owners of this country and to their Old People and Elders. The organisation for which I work, Queensland South Native Title Services is a native title service provider recognised and funded by the Federal Government under the Native Title Act (1993). Slide 2 The area for which QSNTS has statutory recognition under the Native Title Act covers an area spanning Queensland, along the New South Wales border from the Coral Sea to the South Australian border, north to about 250 kilometres north of Mt Isa and running diagonally south eastwards to the coast, marginally south of Sarina. Slide 3 I ought to say that views and opinions expressed are mine and are not necessarily reflective of corporate views or policy of QSNTS. In this conversation I will refer to the Native Title Act as ‘the Act’. But in the consciousness of Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander society, the expression “the Act” is often a reference to The Aboriginal Protection and Restrictions of the Sale of Opium Act 1897. That legislation was an Act of the Queensland Parliament. As a result of dispersal, malnutrition, use of opium and diseases, all a consequence of European incursion into traditional lands coupled with the attempted genocide that came with that incursion, it was widely believed in Queensland that Aborigines were members of a 'dying race'. In 1894 pressure from some quarters of the community saw the Queensland Government commission Archibald Meston to look at what had conveniently, for the colonising power, become the plight of Aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict Over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski
    Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski To cite this version: Matthew Graves, Elizabeth Rechniewski. Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape. E-rea - Revue électronique d’études sur le monde an- glophone, Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone, 2017, 10.4000/erea.5821. hal-01567433 HAL Id: hal-01567433 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01567433 Submitted on 23 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. E-rea Revue électronique d’études sur le monde anglophone 14.2 | 2017 1. Pastoral Sounds / 2. Histories of Space, Spaces of History Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI Publisher Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone Electronic version URL: http://erea.revues.org/5821 DOI: 10.4000/erea.5821 Brought to you by Aix-Marseille Université ISBN: ISSN 1638-1718 ISSN: 1638-1718 Electronic reference Matthew GRAVES and Elizabeth RECHNIEWSKI, « Black Wars and White Settlement: the Conflict over Space in the Australian Commemorative Landscape », E-rea [Online], 14.2 | 2017, Online since 15 June 2017, connection on 23 July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Prevention for LGBTIQ+ Communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial
    Science. Compassion. Action. Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial April 2021 Suicide prevention for LGBTIQ+ communities: Learnings from the National Suicide Prevention Trial ii Acknowledgements Black Dog Institute Black Dog Institute would like to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as Australia’s First People and Traditional Custodians. We value their cultures, identities, and continuing connection to country, waters, kin and community. We pay our respects to Elders past and present and are committed to making a positive contribution to the mental health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia. Brisbane North PHN We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Turrbal and Jagera People of Brisbane, the Gubbi Gubbi people of Caboolture and Bribie Island, the Waka Waka people of Kilcoy and the Ningy Ningy people of Redcliffe. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging for they hold the memories, the traditions, the culture and the hopes of Aboriginal Australia. North Western Melbourne PHN We would like to acknowledge the Wurundjeri People, the Boonerwrung People and the Wathaurong People as the traditional custodians of the land on which our work takes place. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. Acknowledgement of lived experience We acknowledge those contributing to suicide prevention efforts who are survivors of a suicide attempt, have experienced suicidal behaviour, or have been bereaved or impacted by suicide. Your insights and contributions are critical. Thank you The Black Dog Institute thanks the interviewees and other stakeholders from the Brisbane North Primary Health Network (PHN), North Western Melbourne PHN and the LGBTIQ+ Health Australia for their contributions to the development of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Path to Treaty
    Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s PATH TO TREATY February 2020 Copyright Copyright © State of Queensland, February 2020. Copyright protects this publication. Excerpts may be reproduced with acknowledgment of the State of Queensland. This document is licensed by the State of Queensland under a Creative Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 Australian license. CC BY License Summary Statement: In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s Path to Treaty as long as you attribute the work to the State of Queensland. To view a copy of this license, visit: www. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Disclaimer Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples are warned the photographs in this publication may contain images of deceased persons which may cause sadness or distress. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................4 Introduction and history 4 Treaties and agreement making 4 Community engagement process and findings 4 Conclusions 5 Recommendations 5 MESSAGE FROM THE TREATY WORKING GROUP ..................................................8 MEET THE TREATY WORKING GROUP AND EMINENT PANEL ..................................8 GLOSSARY AND TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................ 13 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 14 1. A BRIEF HISTORY OF QUEENSLAND ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Test Decision
    Registration test decision Application name Yugara/YUgarapul People Name of applicant Mr. Desmond Sandy, Mrs. Ruth James, Ms. Pearl Sandy State/territory/region Queensland NNTT file no. QC11/8 Federal Court of Australia file no. QUD586/2011 Date application made 7 December 2011 Date application last amended 16 February 2012 Name of delegate Stephen Rivers-McCombs I have considered this claim for registration against each of the conditions contained in ss. 190B and 190C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). For the reasons attached, I do not accept this claim for registration pursuant to s. 190A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). For the purposes of s. 190D(3), my opinion is that the claim does not satisfy all of the conditions in s. 190B. Date of decision: 10 May 2012 ___________________________________ Stephen Rivers-McCombs Delegate of the Native Title Registrar pursuant to sections 190, 190A, 190B, 190C, 190D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) under an instrument of delegation dated 24 August 2011 and made pursuant to s. 99 of the Act. Facilitating timely and effective outcomes Reasons for decision Table of contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Application overview............................................................................................................... 4 Registration test .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Urban and Peri-Urban Indigenous People's Adaptive
    Low Choy, Darryl, Clarke, Philip, Serrao-Neumann, Silvia, Hales, Robert, Koshade, Olivia and Jones, David 2016, Coastal urban and peri-urban Indigenous people’s adaptive capacity to climate change. In Maheshwari, Basant, Singh, Vijay P. and Thoradeniya, Bhadranie (eds), Balanced urban development: options and strategies for liveable cities, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp.441-461. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_27 This is the published version. ©2016, The Authors Reproduced by Deakin University under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30090806 Chapter 27 Coastal Urban and Peri-Urban Indigenous People’s Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Darryl Low Choy , Philip Clarke , Silvia Serrao-Neumann , Robert Hales , Olivia Koschade , and David Jones Abstract This chapter discusses the adaptive capacity of coastal urban and peri- urban Indigenous People’s to climate change. It is based on the fi ndings of a National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF) funded project that uti- lised a series of case studies that engaged key representatives from Indigenous organisations in fi ve coastal locations in three states of south-eastern Australia (Low Choy D, Clarke P, Jones D, Serrao-Neumann S, Hales R, Koschade O et al., Aboriginal reconnections: understanding coastal urban and peri-urban Indigenous people’s vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, 139 pp, 2013). The study has highlighted the social, economic and environmental impacts on urban and peri- urban Indigenous communities inhabiting coastal areas throughout south-eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022
    DRAFT V20 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022 Working to recover, rebuild and reconnect more resilient Queensland communities following the 2019 Queensland Bushfires August 2020 to come Document details Interpreter Security classification Public The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have Date of review of security classification August 2020 difficulty in understanding this report, you can access the Translating and Interpreting Authority Queensland Reconstruction Authority Services via www.qld.gov.au/languages or by phoning 13 14 50. Document status Final Disclaimer Version 1.0 While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no QRA reference QRATF/20/4207 responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. ISSN 978-0-9873118-4-9 To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Copyright Copies This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority), August 2020. Copies of this publication are available on our website at: https://www.qra.qld.gov.au/fitzroy Further copies are available upon request to: Licence Queensland Reconstruction Authority This work is licensed by State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority) under a Creative PO Box 15428 Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International licence. City East QLD 4002 To view a copy of this licence, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Phone (07) 3008 7200 In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute [email protected] the work to the State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation Action Plan (July 2019 - December 2020) Acknowledgement of Country
    Reconciliation Action Plan (July 2019 - December 2020) Acknowledgement of Country Cooper Grace Ward acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land on which we operate and conduct our business across Queensland and Australia. We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to elders, past, present and emerging. About the artwork Brooke Sutton is a contemporary Indigenous artist from the Kalkadoon people from the Mount Isa area in Queensland. ‘Walumarra business’ is the name of this painting which translates into ‘women’s business’ in the Kalkadoon language. The Kalkadoon people have a connection to the sea as they used to travel north to the gulf country to hunt and gather food. Brooke’s painting depicts the many vibrant colours and life given by the sea to all living sea creatures. Gallery catalogue number – WALGTLDW71 Artist – Brooke Sutton, 14 years old Medium – acrylic and textured acrylic on canvas Artist language group – Kalkatungu (Kalkadoon) Artist language group – Emu Foot Province, Mount Isa Queensland Year painted – 2019 Size – 60cm wide x 90cm high www.cherneesutton.com.au Statement from our Managing Partner At Cooper Grace Ward we want to build better lives for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals and corporations. An initiative of Reconciliation Australia, the Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) program provides a framework for organisations to support the national reconciliation movement. The RAP program contributes to reconciliation by supporting organisations to develop respectful relationships and create meaningful opportunities with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We see the RAP as a way for our firm to advance reconciliation within our own sphere of influence, being legal services in Queensland and across Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Young Queensland Will Then Become the Queen of Lands'
    ‘Young Queensland The Old Government House site before Queensland was established will then become the For thousands of years the river and surrounding land has been the traditional country of the Turrbal Queen of Lands’ and Jagera people. Moreton Bay Courier, 13 December 1859 In 1825 the Moreton Bay penal settlement was established on the northern bank of the river. After fourteen years the convict settlement closed Separation achieved and in 1842 Brisbane was officially opened to all ‘A great event in our history’ settlers. Throughout the 1850s, the Moreton Bay District of New South Wales had fought an often bitter campaign to become a separate, northern colony. QUEEN’S INSTRUCTIONS In early July 1859, ‘the glorious news’ arrived in On 6 June 1859 Queen Brisbane that separation had finally been won. The Victoria signed Letters new colony was to be called Queen’s Land – a name Patent, the document that Queen Victoria had coined herself – and Sir George created Queensland, and Bowen was appointed the colony’s first governor sent Sir George Bowen instructions (below). Months later on 10 December 1859 Governor Bowen Image courtesy of The Royal finally arrived in Brisbane and Queensland was Collection © 2008 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. officially proclaimed a separate self-governing colony. Document image courtesy of Queensland was the only Australian colony to start Government House, Brisbane. with its own parliament without first being a British controlled Crown Colony. An estimated 4000 jubilant people lined Brisbane’s streets to welcome Sir George and Lady Bowen as they made their way from the Botanic Gardens landing to the temporary Government House.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Cultural Heritage
    12. Cultural Heritage Northern Link Phase 2 – Detailed Feasibility Study CHAPTER 12 CULTURAL HERITAGE September 2008 Contents 12. Cultural Heritage 12-1 12.1 Description of the Existing Environment 12-1 12.1.1 Cultural Heritage Significance 12-1 12.1.2 Commonwealth Legislation 12-2 12.1.3 State Legislation 12-2 12.1.4 Local Legislation 12-2 12.1.5 Approach 12-3 12.1.6 Aboriginal Heritage 12-3 12.1.7 Non Indigenous Heritage 12-8 12.2 Impact Assessment 12-17 12.2.1 Western Freeway Connection 12-18 12.2.2 Toowong Connection 12-18 12.2.3 Driven Tunnels 12-19 12.2.4 Kelvin Grove Connection 12-25 12.2.5 Inner City Bypass Connection 12-27 12.2.6 Proposed Ventilation Outlet Sites 12-27 PAGE i 12. Cultural Heritage This chapter addresses Part B, Section 5.8, of the Terms of Reference (ToR), which require the EIS to describe existing values for indigenous and non-indigenous cultural heritage areas and objects that may be affected by Northern Link activities. The ToR also require that the EIS prepare cultural heritage surveys as relevant, to determine the significance of any cultural heritage areas or items and assist with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Management Plans to protect any areas or items of significance. The ToR also require that the EIS provide a description of any likely impacts on cultural heritage values, and to recommend means of mitigating any negative impacts. 12.1 Description of the Existing Environment Cultural heritage focuses on aspects of the past which people value and which are important in identifying who we are.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorisation and Decision-Making in Native Title
    Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council Authorisation and decision-making in native title Authorisation and decision-making in native title Nick Duff Goldfields Land and Sea Council First published in 2017 by AIATSIS Research Publications © Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2017. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act), no part of this article may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Act also allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this publication, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied or distributed digitally by any educational institution for its educational purposes, provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) GPO Box 553, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6261 4285 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Duff, Nick, author. Title: Authorisation and decision-making in native title / Nick Duff.
    [Show full text]
  • Turrbal People
    THE TURRBAL RESPONSE TO THE QLD GOVT CONSULTATION PAPER ON THE REVIEW OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE ACTS Prepared by Ade Kukoyi For & on behalf of the Turrbal Assoc & the Turrbal people. August 2019. 1 1.0 WHO’S WHO IN THE ZOO - THE TURRBAL PEOPLE & THEIR COUNTRY - BRISBANE The detailed accounts and in some cases, scanty records of the earliest ticket-of-leave convicts ( Pamphlet, Parsons and Finnegan), and explorers Oxley, Cunningham and others such as Fyans, Ridley who made the contact with the original inhabitants of the Brisbane area have been corroborated largely by the accounts of Thomas Petrie. 1.1 Tom Petrie's Reminiscences of Early Queensland by Constance Campbell Petrie (1904), is undoubtedly one of the most detailed account of early European contacts with Aborigines in South East Queensland, particularly Brisbane. Tom Petrie was born in Scotland in 1831 and arrived in Brisbane in 1837 with his father Andrew, as a young six- year old boy. His life-long experience of living with the Brisbane Aborigines, written by his daughter Constance, represents an invaluable work of social history which vividly describes life in the Moreton Bay penal settlement from the 1830s. He lived and grew up with the original inhabitants of the Brisbane area, which he knew as the Turrbal. As a member of one of Brisbane’s founding families, Tom Petrie grew up on the colonial frontier. He is arguably the on e of th e primary sources available about the culture, customs and beliefs of the original inhabitants of the Brisbane area. The reason for this is straight forward - whilst the other writers were mostly ‘observers’ or ‘passing through’, Tom Petrie lived and grew up with the Aborigines, and spoke the Turrbal language fluently.
    [Show full text]