DOCSLIB.ORG

Issues in Law & Medicine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Issues in Law & Medicine Address Service Requested Address FALL 2006/SPRING 2007 FALL Terre Haute, IN • 47807-3510 Terre 3 South 6th Street Inc. the Medically Dependent & Disabled, for of the National Legal Center A Publication & MEDICINE LAW ISSUES IN ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE Conforming to the Rule of Law: When Person and Human Being Finally VOL. 22, NOS. 2 & 3 Mean the Same Thing in Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence Charles I. Lugosi, LL.B., LL.M., M.B.E., S.J.D. ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE ISSUES IN LAW Terre Haute, IN Terre Permit No. 165 Nonprofit Org. Nonprofit U.S. Postage PAID VOL. 22, NOS. 2 & 3 FALL 2006/SPRING 2007 A Publication of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc., and the Horatio R. Storer Foundation, Inc. A peer-reviewed publication of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc., and the Horatio R. Storer Foundation, Inc. EDITORIAL POLICY Editor-in-Chief James Bopp, Jr., J.D. Issues in Law & Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal co-published three times Executive Editor Associate Editor per year by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Barry A. Bostrom, J.D. Thomas J. Marzen, J.D. Inc., and the Horatio R. Storer Foundation, Inc. Issues in Law & Medicine is de- voted to providing technical and informational assistance to attorneys, health care professionals, bioethicists, educators, and administrators concerned with Rates/Correspondence. The annual subscription rate is $59 for individuals, the broad range of legal, medical, and ethical issues arising from the provision of $99 for institutions, for three issues. Single issue individual $20; institution health care services. $33.00. The National Legal Center invites the submission of papers to be published in Issues in Law & Medicine. Submitted papers are reviewed by experts in the area Please address all correspondence, including letters to the Editor, to: Issues of the papers’ content, and papers should conform to the highest professional in Law & Medicine, Office of Publications, 3 South 6th Street, Terre Haute, IN standards. 47807-3510, or [email protected]. 1 FORM OF MANUSCRIPT: The manuscript should be double-spaced on 8 /2 x 11 Issues in Law & Medicine (ISSN 8756-8160) is published three issues per year, inch paper with at least a 1-inch margin on all sides. Submit an original printout by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc., and four copies. Copies will not be returned except by request and unless a post- and the Horatio R. Storer Foundation, Inc. age paid envelope is provided by the author. Copyright © 2006 by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent LENGTH: 25 to 30 pages preferred including references, tables, figures, and & Disabled, Inc. footnotes. Longer manuscripts may also be accepted. All rights reserved. No part of this Journal may be reproduced or transmitted in AUTHOR IDENTIFICATION: Name, degrees, schools, work affiliation, and other any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo-copying, pertinent data on all authors are required. Please enclose this information on a recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written separate page. permission from the Publisher. STYLE: UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION (18th ed., 2005). Issues in Law & Medicine is listed in the following: Databases—BELL & HOWELL, BIGCHALK.COM, BIOETHICSLINE, BIOSIS, EBSCO PUBLISH- COPYRIGHT: In view of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, upon acceptance ING, FAXON, GALE GROUP, H. W. WILSON CO., INFORMATION SYSTEMS, of a manuscript for publication by Issues in Law & Medicine, the author(s) will be INFONAUTICS CORP., LEXIS-NEXIS, MEDLARS/MEDLINE, WESTLAW, asked to sign an Author’s Agreement conveying all copyright ownership to the WILLIAM S. HEIN; Indexes—Citation Index, Cumulative Index to Nursing and National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, Current Law Index, Hospital Literature Index, Index to Legal Periodicals, Index Medicus, International Nursing Index, Social Sciences; and Abstracted in—BioLaw; Hastings Center Report; Law, Medicine & Health Care; The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly; Specialty Law Digest: Health Care Cases. Issues in Law & Medicine is printed on acid-free paper. ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................iii Article Conforming to the Rule of Law: When Person and Human Being Finally Mean the Same Thing in Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence …………………………… 119 Abstract …………………………………………………119 I Dividing Human Beings into Persons and Non-Persons 122 A. Human Being ………………………………………123 B. Person ………………………………………………125 II Dehumanizing Humans with Personhood Theories … 127 III Segregationist Theories Acquire the Force of Law …… 133 IV The Liberal’s Dilemma ………………………………… 142 V Equality and Self-Evident Truths ……………………… 148 VI No Justice Is Possible Without Morality ……………… 153 VII Defi ning the Rule of Law ……………………………… 154 VIII Mislabelling Rule by Law as the Rule of Law ………… 155 IX The Genesis of the Rule of Law in America …………… 160 X How Human Slavery Ruined the Rule of Law ………… 163 XI When Unborn Human Beings Were Persons ………… 172 XII Pre-Roe American Abortion Jurisprudence …………… 180 XIII When Feminists Opposed Abortion ………………… 184 XIV Attempting to Restore the Rule of Law: The Fourteenth Amendment ………………………… 185 XVI Artifi cial Persons Gain Protection Under the Fourteenth Amendment …………………………… 187 XVII Do Unborn Natural Persons Qualify Under the Corporate Personhood Tests for Protection Under the Fourteenth Amendment? ………………… 198 XVIII Segregating Unborn Natural Persons From Born Persons Under the Fourteenth Amendment …… 200 XIX The Erosion of Legal Protection for the Unborn ……… 201 XX Brown v. Board of Education: A Model to Restore the Rule of Law ……………………………… 206 VOL. 22, NOS. 2 & 3 FALL 2006/SPRING 2007 XXI The Road To Roe: The Rise of Privacy, Unrestrained Personal Liberty and Fundamental Rights …………………………………208 A. Historical Limits on Personal Liberty ……………………………………210 B. Protecting Children Under the First Amendment ………………………220 C. Using Privacy to Justify Unrestrained Personal Liberty That Harms Others ………………………………………………223 D. The Confl ict Between the First and Fourteenth Amendments ……………………………………………………………230 E. Steinberg v. Brown: The Precedent Ignored in Roe ………………………232 XXIII Rule by Law v. Rule of Law …………………………………………………234 A. Bryn ………………………………………………………………………234 B. The Aftermath of Bryn ……………………………………………………241 XXIV Abandoning the Rule of Law: Roe and Doe …………………………………243 A. Roe ………………………………………………………………………243 B. Doe ………………………………………………………………………246 XXV Defending the Rule of Law for Murderers …………………………………248 XXVI The Imposition of Rule by Law: Casey ……………………………………251 XXVII How Segregation Works: Cruzan …………………………………………255 XXVIII The Conservatives Retreat ……………………………………………………257 XXVIX The Turning Point: Public Outrage over Partial Birth Abortion ……………257 XXX The Revival of Human Slavery ………………………………………………261 A. Cloning …………………………………………………………………262 B. Embryonic Stem Cell Research …………………………………………264 C. Vaccines …………………………………………………………………265 XXXI International Law ……………………………………………………………267 A. Expanding the Class of Depersonalized Humans ………………………267 B. Political Correctness: The Canadian Model ……………………………270 C. Universal Human Rights …………………………………………………271 XXXII The Moral Imperative to Protect Human Life from Conception ……………273 XXXIII Restoring the Rule of Law ……………………………………………………275 XXXIV When Judicial Review Fails …………………………………………………282 XXXV Summary of the Case for Constitutional Personhood ………………………286 XXXVI When Human Being and Person Finally Mean the Same Thing in Fourteenth Amendment Jurisprudence: Equal at Last ……………287 Opinion of this Honorable Court ……………………………………………287 XXVII Beyond Personhood …………………………………………………………289 A. Is There an Affi rmative Government Duty Under the Fourteenth Amendment to Protect Unborn or Born Persons? …………290 B. Application to Abortion …………………………………………………294 C. The “New” Moral Case for Aborting a Constitutional Person ……………296 D. The Jurisprudential Argument …………………………………………299 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………302 Preface The featured article in this edition of Issues in Law & Medicine is the thesis of professor Charles I. Lugosi, which was submitted and defended as part of the requirements for his Doctorate in Juridical Science from the University of Pennsyl- vania. In it, he applies the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitu- tion to the issue of abortion. The Fourteenth Amendment was intended to protect people from discrimination by the states. But racism is not the only thing people need protection from. As a constitutional principle, Dr. Lugosi reasons that the Fourteenth Amendment is not confi ned to its historical origin and purpose, but is available to protect all human beings, including all unborn human beings. The Supreme Court can defi ne “person” to include all human beings, born and unborn. It simply has chosen not to do so. Dr. Lugosi argues that science, history and tradition establish that unborn humans are, from the time of conception, both persons and human beings, thus strongly supporting an interpretation that the unborn meet the defi nition of “person” under the Fourteenth Amendment. The legal test used to extend constitutional personhood to corporations, which are artifi cial “persons” under the law, is more than met by the unborn, demonstrating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENY RESUME CG 016 510 White House Conference on Aging
    DOCUMENY RESUME ED 227 382 CG 016 510 TITLE White House Conference on Aging (Washington, D.C., November 30-December 3, 1981). Final Report. VOlume, 2: Process Proceedings. INSTfTUTION Whitellouse Conference on Aging, Washington, D..C. SPONS AGENCY Department of Health and Human $ervices, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 81 NOTE 141p.; For related documents, see tD-215257-269 And CG 016 509-511. - PUB TYPE Collected Works - ConIerence,Proceedings (021) -- Reports - General (140 . EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 PlUs.Postage. DESCRIp7ORS Aging (Individuals); Committees; Conferendes; *Economic Climate; *Federal Legislation; Gerontology; *Governthent Role; History; Human ServiCes; *Older Adults; Quality of Life; Retirement IDENTIFIERS *White House Conference on Aging ABSTRACT This secopd volume of the final report of the 1981 White House Conference on Aging.presents a historicaloverview of the Conference, tracing its history from its indeption as ajoin' resolution in Congress in 1979 through 'thenationwide preparatory activities, to its culmination with the gathering of delegates and observers in late November of 1981. Previous conferences areoutlined , and the eConomic climate at the time of the 1981Conferenc'e is .described. Enabling legislation and early preparations forthe conferenca are reviewed, and the conference processis described in detail. The texts of welcothing speeches and keynotead-dresses to the Conference delegates are also presented. Reports of the14 Conference' committeesare sumniarized. The appendices present the text ofthe 1981 White House Conference on Aging Act andprovide,lists of the . National Advisory Committee, the state-White House Confekence on ,Aging coordinatOrs, state Wbite House Conferences onAging, the technical committees, the mini-confeiences,_delegates,observers, international observers, official rules of procedure, Conference committee leadership, and the 1981 White House Conference onAging staff.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Indiana Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-MI-02991 Brief Of
    Received: 2/29/2020 11:08 PM In the Indiana Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-MI-02991 Indiana Family Institute, Inc.; Indiana Family Ac- tion, Inc.; and The American Family Association of Indiana; Plaintiffs-Appellants v. The City of Carmel, Indiana; City Attorney for the Appeal from the City of Carmel, Indiana; Douglas Haney, in his offi- Hamilton County Superior Court 1 cial capacity as City Attorney for the City of Carmel, Indiana; The City of Indianapolis-Marion County, Case No. 29D01-1512-MI-010207 Indiana; The City of Indianapolis-Marion County Equal Opportunity Advisory Board; The City of Hon. Michael A. Casati, Judge Bloomington, Indiana; The City of Bloomington Human Rights Commission; The City of Columbus, Indiana; The City of Columbus Human Rights Commission; The State of Indiana; Attorney Gen- eral Curtis Hill, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Indiana; Defendants-Appellees Brief of Appellant American Family Association of Indiana James Bopp, Jr. Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants [email protected] Richard E. Coleson [email protected] Melena S. Siebert [email protected] The Bopp Law Firm, PC 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807 Telephone: 812-232-2434 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants 1 BRIEF OF APPELLANT AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA (“AFA”) Table of Contents Table of Contents . 2 Table of Authorities . 4 Statement of Issues . 5 Statement of Case . 6 Statement of Facts. 7 A. RFRAs have a strongly bipartisan history, same-sex marriage is recent, and this is a type of compelled-speech case called a forced-inclusion-expressive-association case.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: an Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics
    ROBERTSON - REVISED FINAL PRINT VERSION.DOC 12/02/04 6:55 PM Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: An Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics * JOHN A. ROBERTSON The development of assisted reproductive and genetic screening technologies has produced intense ethical, legal, and policy conflicts in many countries. This Article surveys the German and U.S. experience with abortion, assisted reproduction, embryonic stem cell research, therapeutic cloning, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This exercise in comparative bioethics shows that although there is a wide degree of overlap in many areas, important policy differences, especially over embryo and fetal status, directly affect infertile and at-risk couples. This Article analyzes those differences and their likely impact on future reception of biotechnological innovation in each country. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................190 I. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT.............................................193 II. GERMAN PROTECTION OF FETUSES AND EMBRYOS ...............195 III. ABORTION .............................................................................196 IV. ASSISTED REPRODUCTION .....................................................202 A. Embryo Protection and IVF Success Rates................204 B. Reducing Multiple Gestations ....................................207 C. Gamete Donors and Surrogates .................................209 V. EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH......................................211
    [Show full text]
  • Unreasonable Access: Disguised Issue Advocacy and the First Amendment Status of Broadcasters
    [WORKING DRAFT-FESC CONFERENCE, MAY 2014 PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE] UNREASONABLE ACCESS: DISGUISED ISSUE ADVOCACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT STATUS OF BROADCASTERS Kerry L. Monroe* Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1! I. Candidate Political Broadcasting Rights ............................................................ 8! A. History and Purposes of Statutory Political Broadcasting Rights ............... 9! 1.! Equal Opportunities for Candidates for Elective Office .................... 10! 2.! Reasonable Access and Lowest Unit Rate ......................................... 11! B. Regulatory Implementation of Reasonable Access ..................................... 13! C. Court Consideration of the Constitutionality of Reasonable Access .......... 15! II. Gaming the System—Pretextual Candidates ..................................................... 20! A. Incentives to Game the System ................................................................... 20! B. FCC Tolerance of Pretextual Candidates .................................................... 23! III. Walking the Tightrope of Broadcast Regulation .............................................. 28! A. Pursuing Communications Policy Through Structural Regulation ............. 28! 1.! The Origin of Congress’s Regulatory Power over Broadcast ........... 29! 2.! Regulating Broadcast to Pursue Communications Policy ................. 35! B. Reasonable Access and the Means-Ends Fit of the Commission’s Prophylactic
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1996 No. 95 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was floor in a wheelchair, but he was abso- is New Jersey's largest circulation called to order by the Speaker. lutely, totally dedicated to serving. He daily, which essentially addressed the f loved this House. He loved the process issue of health insurance reform as of dealing with issues and problems and well as medical savings accounts and MORNING BUSINESS helping people, and he loved the inter- pointed out how significant this legis- The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the action between human beings. lation is in terms of providing addi- order of the House of May 12, 1995, the I think all of us are a little poorer tional health insurance for many Chair will now recognize Members from and all of us in the House I think on Americans who lose their health insur- lists submitted by the majority and both sides of the aisle are certainly a ance when they lose a job or because of minority leaders for morning hour de- little sadder at the loss of this fine, a prior medical condition. bates. The Chair will alternate recogni- wonderful gentleman who passed away The editorial also details to some ex- tion between the parties, with each over the weekend. I simply wanted to tent, I would say, why we should not party limited to not to exceed 30 min- share with the House those thoughts on include medical savings accounts if we utes, and each Member except the ma- behalf I think of all the Members of the ever want to see health insurance re- jority and minority leaders limited to House.
    [Show full text]
  • Protests Say: Abortion Is a Woman's Right to Choose!
    · AUSTRALIA $1.50 · CANADA $1.25 · FRANCE 1.00 EURO · NEW ZEALAND $1.50 · SWEDEN KR10 · UK £.50 · U.S. $1.00 INSIDE How attempts to shut abortion clinics were defeated in early ’90s — PAGE 9 A SOCIALIST NEWSWEEKLY PUBLISHED IN THE INTERESTS OF WORKING PEOPLE VOL. 73/NO. 23 JUNE 15, 2009 Washington Protests say: abortion is a seeks new sanctions woman’s right to choose! Vigils condemn killing of clinic doctor in Kansas on N. Korea BY TED LEONARD BY BEN Joyce AND MAGGIE TROWE The U.S. government and its impe- WICHITA, Kansas—Just hours af- rialist allies have condemned a recent ter Dr. George Tiller was shot to death, nuclear test and missile launches by about 400 people joined a candlelight North Korea. Washington and Tokyo vigil here May 31 to protest his killing are pressing for a UN resolution to and defend a woman’s right to choose impose more punitive sanctions and abortion. other measures against the country In nearby Lawrence 150 people for daring to challenge their dictates. participated in a similar vigil that Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to night. In the days following the doc- the United Nations, said June 1 that tor’s death, similar events took place the UN Security Council was “mak- throughout Kansas and the Midwest, ing progress” in coming up with a and across the country. new resolution that may involve new sanctions on North Korea. A partial MOBILIZE TO DEFEND draft of the resolution obtained by the Associated Press May 29 calls on WOMEN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE! all governments “immediately to en- Editorial —p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign Finance Safeguards of Federalism
    Emory Law Journal Volume 63 Issue 4 2014 The Campaign Finance Safeguards of Federalism Garrick B. Pursley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Garrick B. Pursley, The Campaign Finance Safeguards of Federalism, 63 Emory L. J. 781 (2014). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol63/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PURSLEY GALLEYSPROOFS 4/3/2014 2:50 PM THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE SAFEGUARDS OF FEDERALISM ∗ Garrick B. Pursley ABSTRACT This Article provides the first systematic account of the relationship between campaign finance and federalism. Federalism—a fundamental characteristic of the constitutional structure—depends for its stability on political mechanisms. States and their advocates and representatives in Congress, federal agencies, political parties, intergovernmental lobbying groups, and other political forums work together to check federal interference with state governments. Entire normative theories of federalism depend on the assumption that this system of political safeguards is working effectively in the background. But the federalism and constitutional theory literatures lack a rigorous account of the effects of dramatic political change on pro-federalism political dynamics. Building that account is particularly timely now. Political safeguards work only if states retain significant political influence. But, as recent elections vividly demonstrate, Citizens United has created a new class of political operators—of which Super PACs are emblematic—whose potential political influence may be limitless.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 11-1179 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., fka WESTERN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. STEVE BULLOCK, Attorney General of Montana, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of Montana --------------------------------- --------------------------------- AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF RETIRED JUSTICES OF THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT AND JUSTICE AT STAKE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- AMY POEHLING EDDY Counsel of Record BOTTOMLY EDDY & SANDLER, PLLP 1230 Whitefish Stage Road Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 752-3303 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae ================================================================ COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) 225-6964 OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ........................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................ 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................... 5 I. The dramatic increase in independent ex- penditures in judicial elections has ad- versely impacted the judiciary’s effective functioning ................................................... 7 A. Judicial election spending
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of a Pregnant Woman's Rights to Abortion: Notes
    A Comparative Analysis of a Pregnant Woman’s Rights to Abortion: Notes on Constitutional Courts’ Decisions of Abortion Laws in Germany and the United States, and their Implications for Korean Abortion Laws Sang Kyung Lee Kwangwoon University, Korea Abstract Contrasting the interesting decisions of two highest tribunals in Germany and the United States, this article suggests that two highest courts have dealt with the issue of abortion by applying a similar yardstick, namely, a balancing test. Both courts might have been under influences derived from each other, alluding that a pregnant woman has the right to abortion qua the right to privacy, which comes within the purview of the constitutional provisions, such as, Basic Law Article 2 (1) and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s decisions and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions are compared in order to find similar constitutional jurisprudence between the two highest tribunals on abortion, rather than the differences. However, the Gonzales v. Carhart case, handed down by the United States Supreme Court in April 18, 2007, which may seriously erode the Roe-Casey line of precedent vis-à-vis a woman’s right to abortion, made the dissenting opinion voiced by Justice Ginsburg that the plurality opinion would chip away the core value of Roe v. Wade persuasive. Therefore, I am tempted to claim that the United States Supreme Court should remain with the distinctive traditions established by Roe and Casey, an effort to protect a pregnant woman’s right to abortion notwithstanding Gonzales v. Carhart, and the Korean Constitutional Court would be better off if it takes into account the converging rationale and yardstick applied to the abortion cases of the two influential highest courts save Gonzales v.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Fantasy Sports Is It Gambling?
    spring 2016 f a m i l y north carolina Daily Fantasy Sports Is It Gambling? Pornography & Kids Constitutional Resistance to Marriage Ruling Planned Parenthood Unmasked Equipping North Carolina families to be voices of persuasion for family values in their communities. www.ncfamily.org nCFamily.org @ncfamilyorg ncfamilyorg get equipped! articles 6 Planned Parenthood Unmasked Undercover journalists spent nearly three years investigating harvesting and selling of unborn babies’ body parts at Planned Parenthood facilities. Brittany Farrell and Traci Griggs separate fact from fiction while summarizing the investigation and current legal battles related to it. 10 Dangerous Exposure feature In the wake of startling research, which shows that most children will be exposed to pornography at a young age, Alysse ElHage details the devastating effect this exposure can have on a child's wellbeing. departments 14 Daily Fantasy Sports As more Americans—especially young people—buy into the gambling scam known as Daily Fantasy at issue 4 Sports, expert Les Bernal lays out the risks and harms About this magazine associated with the seemingly innocent activity. etcetera 5 18 Interviews Quotes, quips and NC Family President John L. Rustin talks with: other items of interest pro-life advocate Gianna Jessen about surviving her mother's abortion attempt; Valerie Huber about the numbers 9 importance of parents’ roles in promoting sexual abstinence; and Dr. Matthew Harrison on his Facts of interest little-known Abortion Pill Reversal Method. front lines 12 20 Constitutional Resistance Faith in action Sixty legal scholars are challenging Americans to constitutionally resist the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling 2016 Election 22 that redefined marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 161 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 No. 135 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, September 21, 2015, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 The House met at 9 a.m. and was rifice on both sides. In the end, may we dress the House for 1 minute and to re- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- all, as Americans, be proud of the proc- vise and extend his remarks.) pore (Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN). esses of elective, democratic govern- Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. ment. f Madam Speaker, last week, the House May all that is done this day be for DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Your greater honor and glory. of Representatives thoughtfully voted PRO TEMPORE Amen. three times to oppose the Iranian nu- clear deal. This bipartisan effort rep- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- f fore the House the following commu- resented the will of the American peo- nication from the Speaker: THE JOURNAL ple, where the majority oppose this WASHINGTON, DC, The SPEAKER pro tempore. The deal. The first vote was a sense of Con- September 18, 2015. Chair has examined the Journal of the gress that the President failed to com- I hereby appoint the Honorable ILEANA last day’s proceedings and announces ply with the law to submit all agree- ROS-LEHTINEN to act as Speaker pro tempore to the House her approval thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Randall A. Terry, Founder, Operation Rescue
    This is me presenting John Paul II a copy of my book and video, Operation Rescue. I spoke in the Vatican at an international pro-life convention, and I urged leaders from around the world to take Operation Rescue to their own country. This was October, 1991. Mr. Newman told the Trademark Office he had been using the name Operation Rescue since July, 1991. As I will now prove, Mr. Newman’s filing with the Trademark Office, as well as his use of the name Operation Rescue is completely fraudulent. Randall A. Terry, Founder, Operation Rescue 1 In addition to finances, Mr. Newman has received unearned notoriety and Operation Rescue “Identity Theft” credibility with the media and the public due to the respect that the name Operation Rescue earned in the late 1980s and early 1990s, long before Troy Newman was involved in the pro-life movement, much less the mission and Suit Filed against Mr. Troy Newman by Mr. Randall Terry, activities of Operation Rescue. Founder of Operation Rescue, in the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. I filed this suit because in April of 2007, I sought to file a trademark of ownership of the name Operation Rescue with the Trademark Office. At that Mr. Newman is fraudulently raising money and sending out press time, my attorney informed me that Mr. Newman had filed for ownership in December of 2006. releases in the name of Operation Rescue; Mr. Newman lied on the oath he filed with the Trademark Office Mr. Newman Lied By Randall Terry In his sworn statement to the Federal Trademark Office, Mr.
    [Show full text]