HIGH STAKES: GAMBLING BALLOT MEAURES, 2006 By SCOTT JO RDA N SEPTEMBER 13, 2007 This publication was made possible by grants from: JEHT Foundation, Fair and Participatory Elections Carnegie Corporation of New York, Strengthening U.S. Democracy Ford Foundation, Program on Governance and Civil Society The Pew Charitable Trusts, State Policy Initiatives Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Program on Democratic Practice 833 NORTH LAST CHANCE GULCH, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL
[email protected] www.followthemoney.org OVERVIEW The 2006 elections saw voters in five states vote on six ballot measures involving gambling issues. Four of the measures sought to expand gambling in some form, while a measure in South Dakota sought to eliminate gambling in the state. Of the six ballot measures, only Arkansas’ Referred Amendment 1 passed. Committees supporting and opposing the measures raised nearly $54 million. Gambling-related enterprises with a direct stake in the passage or failure of the measures provided 89 percent, or $48 million of all contributions related to the measures. Rhode Island saw a turf war between gaming interests: gambling companies provided 98 percent of contributions to committees on both sides of the measures. Anti-gaming committees in the other four states received no contributions from gaming interests. CON TR IBU TIONS TO GAMBLING BA LLOT MEASUR E C OMMITTEES, 2006 PRO- ANTI- STA TE MEA SURE GA MB LIN G GA MB LIN G TOTA L OH Issue 3 $27,219,106 $1,222,076 $28,441,182 RI Question 1 $17,918,133 $5,047,194 $22,965,327 SD Initiated Measure 7 $824,644 $596,173 $1,420,817 NE Initiated Measure 421 $808,846 $91,486 $900,332 AR Referred Amendment 1 $3,441 $9,475 $12,916 NE Proposed Amendment 3 $0 $0 $0 TOTA L $46,774,170 $6,966,404 $53,740,574 Business and special interests — mostly those with gambling ties — contributed more than $52.8 million to committees supporting and opposing the measures.