DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geology of the Mccoy Mountains Formation, Southeastern California and Southwestern Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Geology of the Mccoy Mountains Formation, Southeastern California and Southwestern Arizona The geology of the McCoy Mountains Formation, southeastern California and southwestern Arizona LUCY E. HARDING* Conoco Inc., 3500 General DeGaulle Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana 70114 PETER J. CONEY Laboratory of Geotectonics, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ABSTRACT (south side) onto McCoy Basin rocks. Struc- mountain range, 240 oriented cores taken for tural analysis and paleomagnetic data strong- paleomagnetic analysis, and structural data col- The McCoy Mountains Formation is a 7.3- ly suggest that the thrusting over and folding lected along measured section lines and basin km-thick metasedimentary sequence exposed of the McCoy Basin rocks took place in Late margins. The detailed results of the paleomag- in at least 6 mountain ranges in southeastern Jurassic time as a single event. The fault netic study are presented elsewhere (Harding California and southwestern Arizona. The sil- along the southwestern margin of the McCoy and others, 1983). iciclastic McCoy Mountains Formation is Basin is thus apparently a Jurassic terrane deposited on, and interbedded at its base boundary and may be a northern extension of Geographic Extent of the with, a Jurassic volcanic terrane and is in- the Jurassic Mojave-Sonora megashear. If McCoy Mountains Formation truded by undeformed Upper Cretaceous(?) true, proposed early Tertiary accretion of the plutons. It has been assigned a Cretaceous- Tujunga terrane must have occurred farther The McCoy Mountains Formation is here Paleocene age on the basis of fossil angio- to the southwest. redefined to include (1) the McCoy Mountains sperm wood found within the upper third of Formation of Miller (1944), Greene (1968), the sequence. Presently known exposures of INTRODUCTION and Pelka (1973), as exposed in the McCoy, McCoy Mountains Formation define a west- Coxcomb, and Palen Mountains, California; northwest-trending basin 140 km long by 25 Named forty years ago (Miller, 1944), the (2) equivalent strata in the Dome Rock km wide which was filled from the north by McCoy Mountains Formation remained until Mountains, Arizona (informally referred to as predominantly alluvial processes. The McCoy recently an enigmatic Mesozoic sedimentary ter- the Livingston Hills Formation by Crowl, 1979, Mountains Formation is divided into six rane exposed in at least six mountain ranges in and Marshak, 1979); (3) the continental red bed members, each containing distinctive stratig- southeastern California and southwestern Ari- deposits of Miller (1966, 1970), exposed in the raphy and sedimentary petrology. Sandstone zona. These Mesozoic, clastic, sedimentary rocks area near Crystal Hill in the New Water Moun- consists of quartz, feldspar, and lithics, and are monotonous in lithology, exceedingly thick, tains, Arizona (also called Mesozoic "Red Beds" each member has a different composition. and are very different from the classic Mesozoic by Robison, 1979, 1980); and (4) some of the The source evolved from volcanic-sedimen- sequence exposed on the Colorado Plateau, only exposures of Miller's (1966, 1970) Livingston tary to plutonic-sedimentary composition 250 km to the northeast. They lie at the very Hills Formation (including all exposures in the with time. Much thinner, laterally equivalent southwestern edge of cratonic North America Livingston Hills, Arizona). As redefined, the clastic sequences are now known on the along a major discontinuity or terrane boundary McCoy Mountains Formation is thus exposed in craton adjacent to the basin's northern separating autochthonous North America from the Coxcomb, Palen, and McCoy Mountains, margin. suspect terranes (Coney and others, 1980) to the California, and in the Dome Rock, southwestern The McCoy Mountains Formation is ho- southwest. The role of the McCoy Mountains Plomosa, and New Water Mountains and in moclinal and south-dipping, and its upper- Formation in the tectonic evolution of south- Livingston Hills, Arizona (Fig. 2). Possibly re- most strata are deformed into a north-verg- western North America has not been under- lated rocks are exposed in the Granite Wash and ing, overturned syncline with sympathetic stood. Little Harquahala Mountains and in the Black south-dipping cleavage. Northern exposures The results of a multidisciplinary attack on Rock Hills, Arizona, -100 km northeast of the of McCoy Mountains Formation and under- this major tectonic problem, using methods from study area. Strata which may be thinner, lateral lying Jurassic volcanic terrane contain a stratigraphy, sedimentary petrology, regional equivalents of the McCoy Mountains Formation north-dipping cleavage and south-verging, tectonic analysis, structural analysis, and paleo- (Harding, 1978,1980,1982) are best exposed in overturned folds. Sympathetic to the cleav- magnetism are presented here. Effort was con- the Apache Wash region of the southern Plo- ages and folding are north- and south- centrated in the McCoy, Palen, and Coxcomb mosa Mountains. These rocks were named the bounding faults which limit McCoy Moun- Mountains in California, and in the Dome Rock Livingston Hills Formation by Miller (1966, tains Formation exposures and place the Mountains, southern Plomosa Mountains, and 1970). North American craton (north side) and the Livingston Hills in Arizona (Fig. 1). Data pre- The Mesozoic McCoy Mountains Formation Mojave-Sonora Complex or Tujunga terrane sented here are the result of >23 km of strati- consists of distinctive clastic sequences at least graphic section measured by Jacob Staff, >500 7.3 km thick. The type section is exposed in the samples collected at maximum intervals of McCoy Mountains (Miller, 1944; Pelka, 1973). *Present address: Department of Geology, Mid- 50-75 m for petrographic analysis, paleocurrent The presently known exposures of McCoy dlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont 05753 direction indicators measured throughout each Mountains Formation occupy a broad west- Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 755-769, 11 figs., 2 tables, June 1985. 755 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/96/6/755/3445017/i0016-7606-96-6-755.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 1 Tv Tertiary volcanic rocks I Mm J Mesozoic McCoy Mountains Fm. Mil Ki Late Cretaceous (?) plutonic rocks J Ma j Mesozoic rocks of Apache Wash IMI | Mi 1 Mesozoic plutonic rocks f~ Mu j Mesozoici?) metasedimentary rocks | Mgn [ Augen gneiss, age unknown Jv I Jurassic volcanic rocks Figure 1. Tectonic map of the McCoy Basin, California and Arizona. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/96/6/755/3445017/i0016-7606-96-6-755.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 California // Arizona Basin bounding faults Jp Jurassic Palen Fm. main, secondary Other faults : Pz : I Paleozoic rocks, undivided Orientation of foliation and as- sociated lineation-, bedding, up- PßPy Precambrian basement right and overturned Folds, upright and overturned Precambrian, Paleozoic and Mesozoic -U--U- Depositional contact, stipple on rocks of North America, undivided younger rocks §MSf| Mojave - Sonora composite terrane 5 10 Figure 1. (Continued). Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/96/6/755/3445017/i0016-7606-96-6-755.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 758 HARDING AND CONEY Figure 2. Summary of pre- The McCoy Mountains Formation is divided vious nomencla ture applied into six members, each with different lithology to the McCoy Mountains and sandstone petrology (Fig. 4). The lower Formation. References: (1) McCoy three members, basal sandstone members 1 and Mtns. Green (1968); (2) Pelka 2 and the mudstone member, are equivalent to (1973); (3) Miller (1944); (4) L 7000 Pelka's (1973) units 1-4. The upper three Marshak (1979), Crowl members, the conglomerate, sandstone, a id silt- (1979); (5) Miller (1966, stone members, are equivalent to Pelka's (1973) ' \Dome Rock ¡~ - 6000 1970). \ Mtns. Livingston ÏÏ units 5-14 and to Miller's (1970) conglomerate, ÜÜÄ graywacke, and siltstone members of the Living- Palen / - 5000 ston Hills Formation. The similarity in expo- Mtns. / sures of the coarse clastic McCoy Mountains LIVINGSTON Formation over a strike distance of 140 km is 4000 McCOY HILLS remarkable. Figure 5 shows the correlator! of the six members at the different exposures. MOUNTAINS FORMATION -3000 Thickness and contacts of the measured sections from the McCoy Mountains Formation are Coxcomby FORMATION Mtns.y Missing ¡3 summarized in Table 1. 2000 New H In order to confirm correlation between expo- Water < Mtns. E sures and to provide information abcut the -1000 source of the McCoy Mountains Formation, CoijSinental vRed point counts (400 points minimum per thin sec- Bed CALIF. ARIZ. )eposits tion) were made on the best-preserved sand- West East stones distributed laterally and vertically within the formation. The point-count data are sum- marized in Table 2. Grain parameters ars those northwest-trending band 140 km long by 25 north-south-trending mountain ranges. Because of Dickinson (1970). Figure 6 is a stratigraphic km wide (Harding and others, 1982). Geology of this pattern of exposure, east-west facies presentation of the point-count data frorr Hard- and deformation to the south and west of the changes are well exposed; north-south changes ing (1978, 1982). McCoy Mountains Formation exposures are are not. Jurassic volcanic rocks rest below, and The McCoy Mountains Formation hits been described by Powell (1981a, 1981b), Tosdal are interbedded with, the base of the McCoy subjected to low-grade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beolobical Survey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEOLOBICAL SURVEY Generalized geologic map of the Big Maria Mountains region, northeastern Riverside County, southeastern California by Warren Hamilton* Open-File Report 84-407 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 1984 *Denver, Colorado MAP EXPLANATION SURFICIAL MATERIALS Quaternary Qa Alluvium, mostly silt and sand, of modern Hoiocene Colorado River floodplain. Pleistocene Qe Eolian sand. Tertiary Of Fanglomerate and alluvium, mostly of local PIi ocene origin and of diverse Quaternary ages. Includes algal travertine and brackish-water strata of Bouse Formation of Pliocene age along east and south sides of Big Maria and Riverside Mountains, Fanglomerate may locally be as old as Pliocene. MIOCENE INTRUSIVE ROCKS Tertiary In Riverside Mountains, dikes of 1 e u c o r h y o 1 i t e Miocene intruded along detachment fault. In northern Big Maria Mountains, plugs and dikes of hornbl ende-bi at i te and bioti te-hornbl ende rhyodacite and quartz latite. These predate steep normal faults, and may include rocks both older and younger than low-angle detachment faults. Two hornblende K-Ar determinations by' Donna L. Martin yield calculated ages of 10. 1 ±4.5 and' 21.7 + 2 m.y ROCKS ABOVE DETACHMENT FAULTS ROCKS DEPOSITED SYNCHRONOUSLY WITH EXTENSIONAL FAULTING L o w e r Tob Slide breccias, partly monolithologic, and Mi ocene Jos extremely coarse fanglomerate. or upper Tos Fluvial and lacustrine strata, mostly red. 01i gocene Tob T o v Calc-alkalic volcanic rocks: quartz latitic ignimbrite, and altered dacitic and andesitic flow rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Goals and Objectives
    Appendix C Biological Goals and Objectives Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C.1 Process for Developing the Biological Goals and Objectives This section outlines the process for drafting the Biological Goals and Objectives (BGOs) and describes how they inform the conservation strategy for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan). The conceptual model shown in Exhibit C-1 illustrates the structure of the BGOs used during the planning process. This conceptual model articulates how Plan-wide BGOs and other information (e.g., stressors) contribute to the development of Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) associated with Covered Activities, which are monitored for effectiveness and adapted as necessary to meet the DRECP Step-Down Biological Objectives. Terms used in Exhibit C-1 are defined in Section C.1.1. Exhibit C-1 Conceptual Model for BGOs Development Appendix C C-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The BGOs follow the three-tiered approach based on the concepts of scale: landscape, natural community, and species. The following broad biological goals established in the DRECP Planning Agreement guided the development of the BGOs: Provide for the long-term conservation and management of Covered Species within the Plan Area. Preserve, restore, and enhance natural communities and ecosystems that support Covered Species within the Plan Area. The following provides the approach to developing the BGOs. Section C.2 provides the landscape, natural community, and Covered Species BGOs. Specific mapping information used to develop the BGOs is provided in Section C.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccoy Solar Energy Project Plan Amendment Supplement
    Director’s Protest Resolution Report McCoy Solar Energy Project Plan Amendment California Desert Conservation Area Supplement May 29, 2013 1 Contents Reason for Supplement ................................................................................................................... 3 Reader’s Guide................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Commonly Used Acronyms ................................................................................................ 5 Protesting Party Index ..................................................................................................................... 6 Issue Topics and Responses ............................................................................................................ 7 California Desert Conservation Area .............................................................................................. 7 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 11 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 14 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................... 17 Wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Tectonics of the Maria Fold and Thrust Belt and Mccoy Basin : an Examination of Polyphase Deformation and Synorogenic Response Anthony C
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 8-27-2009 Mesozoic tectonics of the Maria fold and thrust belt and McCoy basin : an examination of polyphase deformation and synorogenic response Anthony C. Salem Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds Recommended Citation Salem, Anthony C.. "Mesozoic tectonics of the Maria fold and thrust belt and McCoy basin : an examination of polyphase deformation and synorogenic response." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds/75 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MESOZOIC TECTONICS OF THE MARIA FOLD AND THRUST BELT AND MCCOY BASIN, SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA: AN EXAMINATION OF POLYPHASE DEFORMATION AND SYNOROGENIC RESPONSE BY ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER SALEM B.S., Arizona State University, 1999 M.S.., Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, 2005 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Earth & Planetary Sciences The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Anthony C. Salem iii DEDICATION For Audrey, my best friend, chief advisor, drill sergeant, sounding board, editor extraordinaire, GIS wizard, partner in crime and great love. Without her love and support, life and this work would have been a lonely endeavor. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS All the work that goes into conducting research and writing a dissertation may be indeed done by one person, but is actually the result of the efforts and support of many people who should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy
    BLM Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy Final Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management May 2016 Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy Final Report prepared by Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory for U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management May 2016 Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy This page intentionally left blank Riverside East Solar Energy Zone Long Term Monitoring Strategy CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................... XIV GENERAL ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................. XVI UNITS OF MEASURE ......................................................................................................................... XVIII 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and Need for the Riverside East SEZ Long-term Monitoring Strategy ................... 1 1.2 Description of the Riverside East SEZ ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Adaptive Management: Rationale
    [Show full text]
  • SIR 2021-5017: Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. U.S. Geological Survey photograph of wind-rippled sand and sand verbena in eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California. Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California By Amy E. East, Harrison J. Gray, Margaret Hiza Redsteer, and Matthew Ballmer Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2021 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: East, A.E., Gray, H.J., Redsteer, M.H., and Ballmer, M., 2021, Landscape evolution in eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017, 46 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215017.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Assessment
    DESERT QUARTZITE SOLAR PROJECT DRAFT PLAN AMENDMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIX Y WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT FOR THE DESERT QUARTZITE SOLAR PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PURCHASE ORDER 4800019091 Prepared for: Desert Quartzite, LLC 135 Main Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Prepared by: URS(an AECOM company) 130 Robin Hill Road, Suite 100 Santa Barbara, California 93117 (805) 692-0600 Fax: (805) 964-0259 Job No. 60486157 June 2016 WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT DESERT QUARTZITE SOLAR PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 WATER REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 2-1 3.0 PROJECT WATER SUPPLY SOURCES ............................................................... 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES ...................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Description of the Palo Verde Mesa Groundwater Basin ........................ 3-1 3.2.2 Regional Hydrogeologic Setting .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Resources
    Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS CHAPTER III.10. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES III.10 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES A paleontological resource is defined in the federal Paleontological Resources Preservation Act (PRPA) as the “fossilized remains, traces, or imprints of organisms, preserved in or on the earth’s crust, that are of paleontological interest and that provide information about the history of life on earth” (16 United States Code [U.S.C.] 470aaa[1][c]). For the purpose of this analysis, a significant paleontological resource is “considered to be of scientific interest, including most vertebrate fossil remains and traces, and certain rare or unusual inverte- brate and plant fossils. A significant paleontological resource is considered to be scientifically important for one or more of the following reasons: It is a rare or previously unknown species It is of high quality and well preserved It preserves a previously unknown anatomical or other characteristic It provides new information about the history of life on earth It has identified educational or recreational value. Paleontological resources that may be considered not to have paleontological significance include those that lack provenance or context, lack physical integrity because of decay or natural erosion, or are overly redundant or otherwise not useful for academic research” (Bureau of Land Management [BLM] Instruction Memorandum [IM] 2009-011; included in Appendix R2). The intrinsic value of paleontological resources largely stems from the fact that fossils serve as the only direct evidence of prehistoric life. They are thus used to understand the history of life on Earth, the nature of past environments and climates, the biological mem- bership and structure of ancient ecosystems, and the pattern and process of organic evolution and extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Bulletin: Jurassic Magmatism and Sedimentation in the Palen
    Jurassic magmatism and sedimentation in the Palen Mountains, southeastern California: Implications for regional tectonic controls on the Mesozoic continental arc Benjamin N. Fackler-Adams* Department of Geological Sciences, University of California at Santa Barbara, Cathy J. Busby Santa Barbara, California 93106 James M. Mattinson } ABSTRACT Our stratigraphic data also document a INTRODUCTION locally interfingering contact between the Stratigraphic and geochronologic data from Dome Rock sequence and the overlying Jurassic strata in the Palen Mountains, south- three regionally extensive Mesozoic strati- McCoy Mountains Formation, the chrono- eastern California (Fig. 1A), record the local ini- graphic units exposed in the Palen Mountains, stratigraphic extent and tectonic significance tiation, development, and demise of continental California, provide constraints on (1) the dura- of which are controversial. We have dated arc magmatism. These volcanic rocks have previ- tion of supermature craton-derived sedimen- three units along and below this contact: (1) a ously been loosely determined by regional litho- tation within the Jurassic magmatic arc, green ignimbrite concordantly overlain by (2) stratigraphic correlations as Middle to Late Juras- (2) the timing of cessation of Jurassic magma- a pink ignimbrite capped by a pink nonwelded sic in age (Reynolds et al., 1987; 1989; Tosdal et tism in southeastern California, and (3) plate- tuff, and (3) a pink plug-dome complex that in- al., 1989). The volcanic rocks are underlain by margin scale correlation of siliciclastic units trudes the pink ignimbrite and the dome talus eolian quartz arenite, and overlain by the thick that record the initiation of Gulf of Mexico rift- of which interfingers with the pink tuff.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrology and Tectonic Setting of the Livingston Hills Formation, Yuma County, Arizona
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 135 Petrology and Tectonic Setting of the Livingston Hills Formation, Yuma County, Arizona by Lucy E. Harding1 Abstract The Livingston Hills Formation is part of an undated 6-km-thick Mesozoic sedimentary terrane exposed over a 16, 000 km 2 area of southeastern California (McCoy Mountains For­ mation) and southwestern Arizona (Livingston Hills Formation and continental red-bed deposits). The terrane is very different from the well-known Mesozoic sedimentary rocks of the Colorado Plateau and has never been included in a regional tectonic synthesis of southwestern North America. Exposed in both the southern Plomosa Mountains (2, 000 m thick) and the LiVingston Hills (3,600 m thick) , the Livingston Hills Formation consists of conglomerate, sandstone, and siltstone. It was deposited in subaerial and shallow-water environments as a series of debris-flow, tidal-flat, and lacustrine sediments. In the Livingston Hills conglomerate clast lithology changes abruptly from supracrustal to igneous. Sediment-transport direc­ tions obtained from the Plomosa Mountains exposure of the Livingston Hills Formation are northeast and west-southwest. Twenty-two petrographic point counts from the two sec­ tions of Livingston Hills Formation suggest nonidentical, mixed plutonic-volcanic prove­ nances. The Livingston Hills Formation is part of a stratigraphically correlative depositional terrane exposed in the Livingston Hills and Plomosa and Dome Rock Mountains, Arizona, and the Palen, McCoy, and Mule Mountains, California. The sedimentary terrane is in dep­ ositional contact above Paleozoic carbonate rocks and probably Jurassic volcanic rocks. It is regionally deformed and locally highly metamorphosed and is intruded by undeformed latest Cretaceous plutons.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccoy Solar Energy Project Draft PA/EIS D-1 May 2012 Appendix D Cultural Resources
    APPENDIX D Cultural Resources McCoy Solar Energy Project Draft PA/EIS D-1 May 2012 Appendix D Cultural Resources This page intentionally left blank McCoy Solar Energy Project Draft PA/EIS D-2 May 2012 Appendix D Cultural Resources TABLE 1 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA EIC Report Number (RI-) Year Author Title 2 1953 Rogers, Malcolm Miscellaneous Field Notes – Riverside County, San Diego Museum of Man. 92 1973 King, Thomas; George Jefferson; Archeological and Paleontological Impact and Michael Gardner Evaluation: American Telephone and Telegraph Company’s Oklahoma City/Los Angeles “A” Cable Route, Between the Colorado River and Corona, California. 160 1977 Greenwood, Roberta Archaeological Resources Survey – West Coast –Mid-Continent Pipeline Project, Long Beach to the Colorado River, Addendum. 161 1978 Greenwood, Roberta Paleontological, Archaeological, Historical, and Cultural Resources – West Coast–Midwest Pipeline Project, Long Beach to Colorado River. 220 1977 Cowan, Richard, and Kurt Wallof Interim Report – Fieldwork and Data Analysis: Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Southern California Edison Palo Verde-Devers 500 kV Power Transmission Line. 221 1980 Russel Kaldenburg, Michael Waters, Cultural Resource Inventory and National Clay Singer, Daniel McCarthy, Register Assessment of the Southern California Ken Hedges Edison Palo Verde to Denvers Transmission Line Corridor (California Portion). 222 1977 Kurt Wahoff, Richard Cowan Cultural Resource Survey of the Proposed Southern California Edison Palo Verde- Denvers 500 Kv Transmission Line. 1211 1980 von Till Warren, Elizabeth, Robert A Cultural Resources Overview of the Colorado Crabtree, Claude Warren, Martha Desert Planning Units. Knack, and Richard McCarty 1249 1978 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) California Desert Program: Archaeological Sample Unit Records for the Big Maria Planning Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D.1 Biological Resources Technical Report
    APPENDIX D.1 Biological Resources Technical Report BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT ATHOS RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Aspen Environmental Group 5020 Chesebro Rd. Suite 200 Agoura Hills, CA Prepared by: IRONWOOD CONSULTING INC. 370 Alabama Street, Suite A Redlands, CA 92373 January 2019 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Site Location..................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Project Summary ............................................................................................................. 3 2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Regional Setting ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Soils ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]