DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhinocerotids in China- Systematics and Materi.Ai, An/H,Ysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhinocerotids in China- Systematics and Materi.Ai, An/H,Ysis RHINOCEROTIDS IN CHINA- SYSTEMATICS AND MATERI.AI, AN/H,YSIS HAOWEN TONG Tong, H., 2001. Rhinocerotids in China - Systematics and material analysis. [Les Rhinocerotidae de Chine: syst~- matique et r~partition]. Geobios 34 (5), 585-591. Villeurbanne, le 30.10.2001. Manuscrit d~pos~ le 10.03.2000; accept~ d~finitivement le 09.04.2001. i ABSTRACT - Under the family Rhinocerotidae, seventeen genera, sixty-two species (including four subspecies and two variants) were recognized or originally named in China. Chilotherium is the most diversified genus, which contains eighteen species and two variants. Rhinoceros sinensis, Coelodonta antiquitatis and Dicerorhinus mercki are the three most frequently appearing species in geologic records, but 61% of the species have only one single loca- lity and horizon. In material, Coelodonta antiquitatis is the best represented species. In geologic horizon, Miocene and Quaternary are the most productive rhino-bearing strata. In taxonomy, the Quaternary rhinos, especially Rhinoceros sinensis and Dicerorhinus mercki, are still in question. © 2001 Editions scientifiques et m~dicales Elsevier SAS KEYWORDS: RHINOCEROTIDAE, INVENTORY, GEOLOGICAL RANGE, CHINA. R]~SUMt~ - Dix-sept genres et soixante-deux esp~ces (y compris quatre sous-esp~ces et trois variants) appartenant fi la famille des Rhinocerotidae ont ~t~ signal,s en Chine; un bon nombre des esp~ces y ont leur gisement-type. Chilotheridium, avec 18 esp~ces et deux variants, est le genre le plus diversifi~. Rhinoceros sinensis, Coelodonta antiquitatis et Dicerorhinus mercki sont les taxons les plus fr~quemment rencontres alors que 61% des esp~ces signal6es ne le sont que d'un seul gisement et d'un seul niveau. Coelodonta antiquitatis est le rhinoceros le mieux representS. Du point de vue stratigraphique, ce sont les niveaux mioc~nes et quaternaires qui soRt les plus riches. Enfin, sur le plan taxonomique, les esp~ces quaternaires et particuli~rement Rhinoceros sinensis et Dicerorhinus mercki posent encore des probl~mes. © 2001 Editions scientifiques et m~dicales Elsevier SAS MOTS-CLES: RHINOCEROTIDAE, INVENTAIRE, EXTENSION STRATIGRAPHIQUE, CHINE. GENERA UNDER THE FAMILY Up to now seventeen genera under the family RHINOCEROTIDAE FOUND IN CHINA Rhinocerotidae were reported in China as listed above, eight of which were named originally in Subfamily DICERATHERIINAE Dollo, 1885 China (marked with *); six genera are known in Diceratherium MARSH, 1875 China only; four genera, Diceratherium, Brachypo- Subfamily ACERATHERINAE Dollo, 1885 therium, Diaceratherium and Gaindatherium are * Chilotherium RINGSTR(~M,1924 not very well represented, because of the poor * Plesiaceratherium YOUNG, 1937 materials and limited locations. As to the genus Subfamily TELEOCERATINAE HAY, 1920 Guixia, it's still open to question, because it is the Brachypotherium ROGER, 1904 earliest record of rhinocerotid in China, and its Diaceratherium DIETRICH,1931 relationship with other rhinocerotines are not yet Subfamily RHINOCEROTINAE Dollo, 1885 clear. The materials referred to the genus Ace- Gaindatherium COLBERT, 1934 ratherium were included within Acerorhinus, and * Guixia You, 1977 finally Acerorhinus was treated as a subgenus Rhinoceros LINNAEUS, 1758 under Chilotherium; now Chilotherium is the lar- Subfamily DICERORHININAE RingstrSm, 1924 gest genus which has two subgenera and twenty Coelodonta BRONN, 1831 species and variants (see Fig. 1), this is also one of Dicerorhinus GLOGER,1841 the most important genera both for paleontology Subfamily ELASMOTHERIINAE Gill, 1872 and stratigraphy, other important genera being Caementodon HEISSIG, 1972 Rhinoceros, Coelodonta, Dicerorhinus. Ninxiathe- Elasmotherium FISCHER, 1808 rium was originally put into Iranotheriinae, but * Huaqingtherium HUANG & YAN, 1983 Subsequent scholars referred it to Elasmotheriinae * Shennongtherium HUANG & YAN, 1983 (Gu~rin 1989; Heissig 1989). Sinotherium is a * Sinotherium RINGSTROM,1924 genus widely accepted, but some authors moved the * Tesselodon YAN, 1979 species from under this genus to Elasmotherium Subfamily IRANOTHERIINAE Kretzoi, 1942 without any comment, and didn't list the name of * Ninxiatherium CHEN, 1977 Sinotherium in the inventory of Elasmotheriines 586 FIGURE 1 - Numbers of species Diceratherium -- (including subspecies and variants) Chilotherium ........................................ named or recognized in each genus of rhinocerotids in China. Nombre Plesiaceratherium .... d'esp~ces (sous-esp~ces et variants Brachypotherium -- inclus) dgfinies ou reconnues en Diaeeratherium -- Chine daBs chaque genre de Rhino- cerotidae. Gaindatherium -- Guixia .... Rhinoceros .................. Coelodonta ........ Dicerorhinus ...................... Caementodon -- Elasmotherium .... Huaqingtherium .... Shennongtherium -- Sinotherium .... Tesselodon -- Ninxiatherium -- I 1 I I I 0 5 t0 15 20 Numberof species (Huang & Yah, 1983); actually, there exists a large 13. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) habereri var. laticeps temporal gap between Sinotherium and Elasmo- RINGSTROM, 1924 (L Mio.) therium. 14. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) planifrons RINGSTR(}M, 1924 (L Mio.) 15. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) wimani RINGSTROM, 1924 (L Mio.) SPECIES (INCLUDING SUBSPECIES) OF 16. ? Chilotherium brancoi (SCHLOSSER,1903) Teilhard et RHINOCEROTIDS FOUND IN CHINA al:, 1942 (L Mio-E Pli.) = Rhinoceros brancoi SCHLOSSER,1903 1. Diceratherium minus (RINGSTROM, 1924) Bi et ai., 17. Chilotherium fenhoensis TUNGet al., 1975 (L Mio.) 1977 (M-L Mio.) 18. Chilotherium tanggulaense ZHENG, 1980 (L Mio.) = Diceratherium palaeosinense var. minus RING- 19. Chilotherium xizangensis JI et al., 1980 (L Mio.) STROM, 1924 20. Chilotherium yunnanensis TANGet al., 1974 (L Pli.) 2. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) blanfordi LYDEKKER 21. Plesiaceratherium gracile YOUNG, 1937 (M Mio.) (1885) vat. hipparionum (KOKEN, 1885) 22. Plesiaceratherium shanwangensis WANG, 1965 (M = Aceratherium blanfordi var. hipparionum KOKEN, Mio.) 1885 (?) 23. Diaceratherium cf. aurelianense (NouEL, 1866) (M 3. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) ceratorhinus (SCHLOS- Mio.) SEn, 1903) (?) 24. Brachypotherium pugnator (MATSUMOT0, 1921) (E- M Mio.) = Aceratherium ceratorhinus SCHLOSSER,1903 25. Gaindatherium cf. browni COLBERT,1934 (E Pli.) 4. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) cornutum QIU & YAN, 26. Guixia youjiangensis You, 1977 (L Eoc.) 1982 (E Pli.) 27. Guixia simplex You, 1977 (L Eoc.) 5. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) hezhengensis (QIu & 28. Rhinoceros chaii LI, 1979 (unpublished) (invalid XIE, 1987) (L Mio.) name) = Acerorhinus hezhengensis QIU & XIE, 1987 29. o Rhinoceros oweni RINGSTROM, 1927 (Synonym of 6. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) huadeensis (QIu, 1979) Rhinoceros sinensis by OSBORN; Synonym of (L Mio.) Dicerorhinus mercki by Teilhard, 1942) (homeR = Aceratherium huadeensis QIU, 1979 nudum) 7. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) palaeosinense (RING- 30. o Rhinoceros plicidens KOKEN, 1885 (Synonym of STROM,1924) Teilhard et al., 1942, Kretzoi, 1942 (L Rhinoceros sinensis) (nomen nudum) • I Mio.) 31. o Rhinoceros pygmaeus RINGSTROM, 1927 (materials = Diceratherium palaeosinense RINGSTROM,1924 referred to Chilotherium ) (homeR nudum ) 8. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) tianzhuense ZHENG, 32. o Rhinoceros simplicidens KOKEN, 1885 (Synonym of 1982 (L Mio.) Rhinoceros sinensis) (nomen nudum) 9. Chilotherium (Acerorhinus) tsaidamense (BOHLIN, 33. Rhinoceros sinensis OWEN, 1870 (E-L Ple.) 1937) Teilhard et al., 1942, Kretzoi, 1942 (L Mio.) 34. Rhinoceros sivalensis FALCONER • CAUTLEY, 1868 = Diceratherium tsaidamense BOHLIN, 1937 (M Ple.) 10. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) anderssoni RINGSTROM 35. Rhinoceros sondaicus DESMAREST, 1822 (Hol.) 1924 (L Mio.) 36. Rhinoceros unicornis LINNAEUS, 1758 (EPle.) 11. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) gracile RINGSTROM, 37. Coelodonta antiquitatis (BLUMENBACH, 1799,1807) 1924 (L Mio.) (M-L Ple.) 12. Chilotherium (Chilotherium) habereri (ScHLOSSER, = Rhinoceros tichorhinus CUVIER,1812 1903) Teilhard et al., 1942 (L Mio-E Pli.) = Rhinoceros manchuricus ISHIJIMA,1939, Teilhard = Rhinoceros haberri SCHLOSSER, 1903 et al., 1942 587 TABLE 1- Categories of species Category Frequency of Species Ordinal hum of species as in theft according to the frequency of occlllTence number occurrence. Catggorisation des category I >60 2 33, 37 esp~ces en fonction de la frdquen- category II 40~60 0 ce de leur ddcouverte. category HI 20~39 1 47 category IV 5~19 0 category V 2~4 18 1, 2, 7, 9, t0, 12, 15, 16, 2t, 22, 24, 35, 40, 41, 48, 49, 50 category VI '"l 33 3, 4, 5, 6,"8, 13, 14 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27, 34, 36, 38, 39, 43, 44, 46, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 FIGURE 2 - Percentage of diffe- • ~ "~~/~' 4% 0% rent categories of species accor- 61% /, i~ ~ 6g/o ding to the frequency of occur- Ill category I >60 rence, the pattern shows the category II 40~60 majority (61%) of the species category III 20~39 were reported only by once. lcategory IV 5~19 Pourcentage des diffdrentes catd- D category V 2~4 gories d'esp~ces en fonction de la frdquence de leur ddcouverte: 61 ~ category VI 1 % n'ont dtd trouvdes qu'une seule fois. -d-~tegory l~aterials 'fo~d f~3reach [Total numbers Species numbered as in previous group in each iategory text Category I Species represented by 37, 38 complete skeletons Category II Species with complete 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 17, 33, 47 skull and some limb bones TABLE 2 - Category of species Category HI Species with complete or | i-3 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 19, 35, 39, 44, according to fossil materials. almost, complete ,skull 46, 48, 50, 52, 56, 62 Catdgorisation des esp~ces
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleoecological Comparison Between Late Miocene Localities of China and Greece Based on Hipparion Faunas
    Paleoecological comparison between late Miocene localities of China and Greece based on Hipparion faunas Tao DENG Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044 (China) [email protected] Deng T. 2006. — Paleoecological comparison between late Miocene localities of China and Greece based on Hipparion faunas. Geodiversitas 28 (3) : 499-516. ABSTRACT Both China and Greece have abundant fossils of the late Miocene Hipparion fauna. Th e habitat of the Hipparion fauna in Greece was a sclerophyllous ever- green woodland. Th e Chinese late Miocene Hipparion fauna is represented respectively in the Guonigou fauna (MN 9), the Dashengou fauna (MN 10), and the Yangjiashan fauna (MN 11) from Linxia, Gansu, and the Baode fauna (MN 12) from Baode, Shanxi. According to the evidence from lithology, carbon isotopes, paleobotany, taxonomic framework, mammalian diversity and faunal similarity, the paleoenvironment of the Hipparion fauna in China was a subarid open steppe, which is diff erent from that of Greece. Th e red clay bearing the Hipparion fauna in China is windblown in origin, i.e. eolian deposits. Stable carbon isotopes from tooth enamel and paleosols indicate that C3 plants domi- nated the vegetation during the late Miocene in China. Pollens of xerophilous and sub-xerophilous grasses show a signal of steppe or dry grassland. Forest mammals, such as primates and chalicotheres, are absent or scarce, but grass- land mammals, such as horses and rhinoceroses, are abundant in the Chinese Hipparion fauna. Th e species richness of China and Greece exhibits a similar KEY WORDS trend with a clear increase from MN 9 to MN 12, but the two regions have Hipparion fauna, low similarities at the species level.
    [Show full text]
  • Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the Upper
    Geobios 50 (2017) 197–209 Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article A new Elasmotheriini (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) from the upper § Miocene of Samburu Hills and Nakali, northern Kenya a, b c d Naoto Handa *, Masato Nakatsukasa , Yutaka Kunimatsu , Hideo Nakaya a Museum of Osaka University, 1-20 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan b Laboratory of Physical Anthropology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan c Faculty of Business Administration, Ryukoku University, 67 Tsukamoto-cho, Fukakusa, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto 612-8577, Japan d Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, 1-21-35 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Several rhinocerotid cheek teeth and mandibular fragments from the upper Miocene of the Samburu Received 15 August 2016 Hills and Nakali in northern Kenya are described. These specimens show characteristics that place them Accepted 20 April 2017 in the Tribe Elasmotheriini such as a constricted protocone, a developed antecrochet, and coronal Available online 8 May 2017 cement. The present specimens are compared with other Elasmotheriini species from Eurasia and sub- Saharan East Africa. They are found to be morphologically different from the previously known species of Keywords: Elasmotheriini. Morphologically, they are most similar to Victoriaceros kenyensis from the middle Elasmotheriini Miocene of Kenya, but differ from V. kenyensis in having the upper molars with the simple crochet, Rhinocerotidae lingual groove of the protocone and enamel ring in the medisinus. Therefore, the present specimens are Late Miocene assigned to a new genus and species of Elasmotheriini: Samburuceros ishidai.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Faunal Change of Late Miocene Africa and Eurasia: Mammalian
    Faunal Change of Late Miocene Africa and Eurasia: Title Mammalian Fauna from the Namurungule Formation, Samburu Hills, Northern Kenya Author(s) NAKAYA, Hideo African study monographs. Supplementary issue (1994), 20: 1- Citation 112 Issue Date 1994-03 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/68370 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University African Study Monographs, Supp!. 20: 1-112, March 1994 FAUNAL CHANGE OF LATE MIOCENE AFRICA AND EURASIA: MAMMALIAN FAUNA FROM THE NAMURUNGULE FORMATION, SAMBURU HILLS, NORTHERN KENYA Hideo NAKAYA Department ofEarth Sciences, Kagawa University ABSTRACT The Namurungule Formation yields a large amount of mammals of a formerly unknown and diversified vertebrate assemblage of the late Miocene. The Namurungule Formation has been dated as approximately 7 to 10 Ma. This age agrees with the mammalian assemblage of the Namurungule Formation. Sedimentological evidence of this formation supports that the Namurungule Formation was deposited in lacustrine and/or fluvial environments. Numerous equid and bovid remains were found from the Namurungule Formation. These taxa indicate the open woodland to savanna environments. Assemblage of the Namurungule Fauna indicates a close similarity to those of North Africa, Southwest and Central Europe, and some similarity to Sub­ Paratethys, Siwaliks and East Asia faunas. The Namurungule Fauna was the richest among late Miocene (Turolian) Sub-Saharan faunas. From an analysis of Neogene East African faunas, it became clear that mammalian faunal assemblage drastically has changed from woodland fauna to openland fauna during Astaracian to Turolian. The Namurungule Fauna is the forerunner of the modem Sub-Saharan (Ethiopian) faunas in savanna and woodland environments. Key Words: Mammal; Neogene; Miocene; Sub-Saharan Africa; Kenya; Paleobiogeography; Paleoecology; Faunal turnover.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Miocene Indarctos (Carnivora: Ursidae) from Kalmakpai Locality in Kazakhstan
    Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS Vol. 321, No. 1, 2017, рр. 3–9 УДК 569.742.2/551.782.1: 574 LATE MIOCENE INDARCTOS (CARNIVORA: URSIDAE) FROM THE KARABULAK FORMATION OF THE KALMAKPAI RIVER (ZAISAN DEPRESSION, EASTERN KAZAKHSTAN) G.F. Baryshnikov1* and P.A. Tleuberdina2 1Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]; 2Museum of Nature of “Gylym ordasy” Republican State Organization of Science Committee, MES RK, Shevchenko ul. 28, 050010 Almaty, Kazakhstan; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The big bear from the genus Indarctos is studied for the Neogene fauna of Kazakhstan for the first time. Material is represented by the isolated М1 found at the Late Miocene deposits (MN13) of the Karabulak Formation of the Kalmakpai River (Zaisan Depression, Eastern Kazakhstan). Tooth size and its morphology suggest this finding to be referred to I. punjabiensis, which was widely distributed in Eurasia. Key words: biostratigraphy, Indarctos, Kazakhstan, Late Miocene ПОЗДНЕМИОЦЕНОВЫЙ INDARCTOS (CARNIVORA: URSIDAE) ИЗ ФОРМАЦИИ КАРАБУЛАК НА РЕКЕ КАЛМАКПАЙ (ЗАЙСАНСКАЯ КОТЛОВИНА, ВОСТОЧНЫЙ КАЗАХСТАН) Г.Ф. Барышников1* и П.А. Тлеубердина2 1Зоологический институт, Российская академия наук, Университетская наб. 1, 199034 Санкт-Петербург, Россия; e-mail: [email protected]; 2Музей природы, РГП «Гылым ордасы» КН МОН РК, Шевченко 28, 050010 Алматы, Казахстан; e-mail: [email protected] РЕЗЮМЕ Впервые для неогеновой фауны Казахстана изучен крупный медведь из рода Indarctos. Материал представ- лен изолированным М1, найденным в позднемиоценовых отложениях (MN13) формации Карабулак на реке Калмакпай (Зайсанская котловина, Восточный Казахстан). Размеров и зубная морфология позволяет отне- сти находку к I.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmotherians - Evolution, Distribution and Ecology
    The World of Elephants - International Congress, Rome 2001 Elasmotherians - evolution, distribution and ecology N.G. Noskova Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia - [email protected] SUMMARY: Elasmotherians from an Early Pleistocene, Tamanian mammal assemblage at Sinaya Balka (Black Sea area, Russia) were studied in order to (1) assess the evolution and distribution of this genus, and (2) evaluate the likelihood that Elasmotherium caucasicum is a bona fide species. In this region, Elasmotherium caucasicum Borissjak, 1914, is commonly associated to the Tamanian elephant (Archidiskodon meridionalis tamanensis). It has a more primitive dental morphology than E. sibiricum Fisher, 1808, with which it was formerly considered to be synonymous, and therefore constitutes a separate species. Ecological peculiarities and paleoenvironmental conditions, proposed for E. caucasicum, could be useful for understanding the biogeography of the region at the time of Archidiskodon meridionalis tamanensis. 1. INTRODUCTION basin is typical for slightly worn teeth only. Two more species, which represent the earli- Elasmotheriums are giant rhinoceroses est record of the genus, were described from which lived in the Early Pleistocene of China by Chow (1959): E. inexpectatum and E. Southern Russia. After the Tamanian elephant peii (Shansi). Chinese species were considered (Archidiskodon meridionalis tamanensis), by Chow (1959) to be ancestral for E. cauca- Elasmotherium caucasicum is the most fre- sicum and E. sibiricum, which were widely dis- quently found mammal in the Tamanian assem- tributed in the Eastern Europe (e.g., Russia), blage. They form the most typical assamblage there being only two questionable records of of large herbivores for the interval 1.1-0.8 My. Elasmotherium sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48 (2): 320, 2003
    Book review Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48 (2): 320, 2003 Old World Neogene elasmotheriinan rhinoceroses Pierre−Olivier Antoine. 2002. Phylogenie et evolution des ings (almost 280 figures in total), and the reasons for coding clearly Elasmotheriina (Mammalia, Rhinicerotidae). Memoires du Mu− explained. The phylogenetic analysis, using the computer programs seum national d’Histoire naturelle 188. Publications Scienti− PAUP (Swofford 1998) and Henning 86 (Farris 1988), follows fiques du Museum Paris, 359 pages (hardcover). CD−ROM of (233–318). It includes an analysis of the complete matrix plus sev− the volume provided. EUR 69.00. eral analyses of subgroups of taxa. It also includes comments on limitations of different analyses, an extensive discussion on the im− This voluminous book, part of a series of scientific publications of pact of the taxonomic sampling on apomorphy distribution, on the the Museum national d’Histoire naturelle in Paris, is a monograph ontogenetic variations on the topology of the obtained cladograms, of one specialized group of Neogene Old World rhinoceroses of the and comments on problems of homoplasy. In spite of the influence subtribe Elasmotheriina, recorded from Siberia and China through of different factors on the cladograms, the main pattern of phylo− Pakistan and Iran to Spain and Africa. The book relates a two hun− genetic relationships within the Elasmotheriina is corroborated. dred year history of studies on this group, and, at the same time, The analysis produced three equally parsimonious trees from gives a perfect presentation of the consecutive stages of the modern whicha single strict consensus tree (fig. 288) was obtained. The study of a fossil animal group.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a Late Miocene Mammalian Fauna from Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia, and Its Paleozoogeographical Significance
    Article Geology February 2011 Vol.56 No.6: 526–534 doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4259-0 SPECIAL TOPICS: Discovery of a Late Miocene mammalian fauna from Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia, and its paleozoogeographical significance DENG Tao1*, LIANG Zhong1,2, WANG ShiQi1, HOU SuKuan1,3 & LI Qiang1 1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 China Geological Library, Beijing 100083, China; 3 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Received May 10, 2010; accepted October 27, 2010 The Wulanhua Fauna (~7 Ma) derives from the basal part of Late Miocene red clays in Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia. Chi- nese red clay deposits are rich in fossils of the Hipparion fauna, and are relatively widely distributed across Shanxi, Shaanxi, He- nan, and Gansu provinces. The Mongolian Plateau also contains well-developed Neogene deposits, especially in central Inner Mongolia, where a sequence of mammalian faunas has been identified. The discovery of the Wulanhua Fauna provides an impor- tant indicator of the paleogeographical distribution of the Hipparion fauna, and this study also contributes to a better understand- ing of the climatic and environmental significance of red clays. Most forms of the Wulanhua Fauna are the same as or close to taxa within the Baode Fauna. However, some forms are slightly more derived than those of the Baode Fauna, which may indicate a slightly younger geological age of about 7 Ma. The components of the Wulanhua Fauna suggest that the habitat was a typical steppe and therefore yield direct evidence to delineate the boundary between the east and west subregions of the Late Miocene Hipparion fauna in North China.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fossil Rhinoceros Elasmotherium (Including the Collections of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
    CRANIUM 22, 1 (2005) On the fossil rhinoceros Elasmotherium (including the collections of the Russian Academy of Sciences) Vladimir Zhegallo, Nikolay Kalandadze, Andrey Shapovalov, Zoya Bessudnova, Natalia Noskova, Ekaterina Tesakova Summary This article summarizes the results of nearly 200 years of study of the fossil rhinoceros Elasmotherium, first described by Gotthelf Fischer in 1808. Problems of its geographical and chronological distribution are discussed, and morphological and ecological reconstructions of the species by various researchers are demonstrated and discussed. The article also gives information about the original type material of G. Fischer, which originally was preserved in the Natural History Museum of the Imperial Moscow University, and is presently stored in the Vernadsky State Geological Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Especially the extensive work of assistant professor V.A. Teryaev of the Moscow Institute of Geological Exploration on Elasmotherium are highlighted. Samenvatting Dit artikel vat de resultaten samen van bijna twee eeuwen van studie van de fossiele neushoorn Elasmotherium, oorspronkelijk beschreven door Gotthelf Fischer in 1808. Problemen betreffende de geografische en chronologische verspreiding van dit genus worden besproken, en morphologische en ecologische reconstructies door diverse onderzoekers worden gepresenteerd en besproken. Het artikel geeft daarnaast informatie over het originele type materiaal van G. Fischer, dat oorspronkelijk bewaard werd in het Museum voor Natuurhistorie van de Keizerlijke Universiteit van Moskou, en die momenteel opgeslagen ligt in het Vernadsky Staatsmuseum voor Geologie van de Russische Akademie van Wetenschappen. Het uitgebreide werk van assistent professor V.A. Teryaev van het Moskou Instituut voor Geologisch Onderzoek over Elasmotherium krijgt bijzondere aandacht. Introduction these animals in modern and past cultures will During the second half of the Pleistocene also be mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Horns, Tusks, and Flippers: the Evolution of Hoofed Mammals
    HORNS, TUSKS, AND FLIPPERS: THE EVOLUTION OF HOOFED MAMMALS Donald R. Prothero Occidental College Los Angeles, California and Robert M. Schoch Boston University Boston, Massachusetts The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London 5 AMYNODONTS HYNACOOON TS Nyrat:l'Jdon 7r�I EJiflnplt�JN• Figure 14.1. Family tree of rhinocerotoids in North America. (Drawn by C. R. Prothero). 14. Rhinoceroses without Horns "ANCIENT DACIANS" AND SIBERIAN MUMMIES results in 1777 and 1779 he described fo ssilized and mum­ Before the rise of modern comparative anatomy and mified "large animals of India, "including elephants, rhi­ paleontology, the giant bones fo und in the earth were a great noceroses, and buffalos [now recognized as extinct Ice Age source of wonder, mystery, and eventually legends, In woolly rhinos and mammoths, and bison]. His most spec­ Chapter 8, we saw how many of these "giants in the earth," tacular find was a mummy of a woolly rhinoceros, fo und interpreted as gigantic humans, were actually the remains of with its skin intact in the frozen ground on the banks of the mastodonts or mammoths, The remains of fossil rhinoceros­ Viloui (also spelled Vilyuy) River. To Pallas this was "con­ es (Fig. 14. 1) were similarly misinterpreted. The horns of vincing proof that it must have been a most violent and most the woolly rhinoceros were thought by Siberians to be the rapid flood which once carried these carcasses toward our claws of gigantic predatory birds and may have been glacial climates, before corruption had time to destroy their responsible for the myth of the griffin (also spelled soft parts." "gryphon").
    [Show full text]
  • A Bizarre Tandem-Horned Elasmothere Rhino from the Late Miocene of Northwestern China and Origin of the True Elasmothere
    Article Geology May 2013 Vol.58 No.15: 18111817 doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5574-4 A bizarre tandem-horned elasmothere rhino from the Late Miocene of northwestern China and origin of the true elasmothere DENG Tao1,2*, WANG ShiQi1 & HOU SuKuan1 1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China Received September 18, 2012; accepted October 19, 2012; published online November 27, 2012 Although the modern Indian and Javan rhinos have a single horn on their noses, the extinct one-horned rhino Elasmotherium was a source for the legendary unicorn, because the latter had a very long horn on its forehead and lived with the prehistoric human beings who drew its images on cave paintings. Elasmothere rhinos first appeared in South Asia in the Early Miocene, but the origin of Elasmotherium has been unclear. All other elasmotheres have a weak or strong nasal horn, whereas Elasmotherium seems to lose the nasal horn of its ancestors and to get a huge frontal horn apparently abruptly. Here we report the first discovered skull of Sinotherium lagrelii from the Late Miocene red clays in the Linxia Basin, northwestern China. This skull has an enor- mous nasofrontal horn boss shifted posteriorly and a smaller frontal horn boss, which are connected to each other, indicating an intermediate stage for the single frontal horn of Elasmotherium. Morphological and phylogenetic analyses confirm that Sinother- ium is a transitional taxon between Elasmotherium and other elasmotheres, positioned near the root of the giant unicorn clade and originated in a subarid steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS 35A JOURNAL of VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Miocene
    -302 第52卷 第3期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 265 2014年7月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA figs. 1-9 A Late Miocene Ursavus skull from Guanghe, Gansu, China QIU Zhan-Xiang DENG Tao WANG Ban-Yue (Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 [email protected]) Abstract An almost complete Ursavus skull in association with its mandible is described. The skull was recently found from upper part of Liushu Formation in Linxia Basin. Its stratigraphic level and geologic age are correlated to the late Bahean ALMA/S, ~8 Ma. It represents a new species, here named Ursavus tedfordi. Cladistic analysis is conducted using the TNT software, based on a matrix of 11 taxa and 37 characters. The tree 5 of the 8 most parsimonious trees is chosen as the most reliable to reflect the phylogenetic history of the ursid clade. As the tree 5 shows, after divergence from the Oligocene-Early Miocene hemicyonids (Cephalogale), the ursid clade first yielded two stem-taxa: Ballusia elmensis and B. orientalis, the latter of which being an aberrant branch. Then, two major subclades emerged: one comprising Kretzoiarctos, Agriarctos and Ailurarctos, the other containing all Ursavus species and their descendants including all living bears (excluding Ailuropoda). Kretzoiarctos may not be the direct ancestral form of the giant panda as Abella and colleagues (2012) suggested, but the ancestral form of the lineage of Indarctos (+Agriotherium ?). Among the numerous Ursavus species, U. tedfordi is the most advanced and closest related to the living bears (excluding Ailuropoda) in morphology, however, might belong to a side-branch, judging by the autapomorphies possessed by it.
    [Show full text]