Reducing Cognitive Load and Improving Warfighter Problem
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
fpsyg-11-554706 November 11, 2020 Time: 15:25 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 November 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554706 Reducing Cognitive Load and Improving Warfighter Problem Solving With Intelligent Virtual Assistants Celso M. de Melo1*, Kangsoo Kim2,3, Nahal Norouzi4, Gerd Bruder3 and Gregory Welch2,3,4 1 Computational and Information Sciences, CCDC US Army Research Laboratory, Playa Vista, CA, United States, 2 College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States, 3 Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States, 4 Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States Recent times have seen increasing interest in conversational assistants (e.g., Amazon Edited by: Alexa) designed to help users in their daily tasks. In military settings, it is critical to design Varun Dutt, assistants that are, simultaneously, helpful and able to minimize the user’s cognitive Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, load. Here, we show that embodiment plays a key role in achieving that goal. We India present an experiment where participants engaged in an augmented reality version Reviewed by: Ion Juvina, of the relatively well-known desert survival task. Participants were paired with a voice Wright State University, United States assistant, an embodied assistant, or no assistant. The assistants made suggestions Michail Maniadakis, Foundation for Research verbally throughout the task, whereas the embodied assistant further used gestures and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), and emotion to communicate with the user. Our results indicate that both assistant Greece conditions led to higher performance over the no assistant condition, but the embodied *Correspondence: assistant achieved this with less cognitive burden on the decision maker than the Celso M. de Melo [email protected]; voice assistant, which is a novel contribution. We discuss implications for the design [email protected] of intelligent collaborative systems for the warfighter. Specialty section: Keywords: intelligent virtual assistant, collaboration, cognitive load, embodiment, augmented reality This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal INTRODUCTION Frontiers in Psychology Received: 22 April 2020 In the near future, humans will be increasingly expected to team up with artificially intelligent Accepted: 23 October 2020 (AI) non-human partners to accomplish organizational objectives (Davenport and Harris, 2005; Published: 17 November 2020 Bohannon, 2014). This vision is motivated by rapid progress in AI technology that supports a Citation: growing range of applications, such as self-driving vehicles, automation of mundane and dangerous de Melo CM, Kim K, Norouzi N, tasks, processing large amounts of data at superhuman speeds, sensing the environment in ways Bruder G and Welch G (2020) that humans cannot (e.g., infrared), and so on. This technology is even more relevant given Reducing Cognitive Load the increasing complexity and dynamism of modern workplaces and operating environments. and Improving Warfighter Problem Solving With Intelligent However, the vision for AI will only materialize if humans are able to successfully collaborate with Virtual Assistants. these non-human partners. This is a difficult challenge as humans, on the one hand, do not fully Front. Psychol. 11:554706. understand how AI works and, on the other hand, are often already overburdened by the task doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554706 (Lee and See, 2004; Hancock et al., 2011; Schaefer et al., 2016). Frontiers in Psychology| www.frontiersin.org 1 November 2020| Volume 11| Article 554706 fpsyg-11-554706 November 11, 2020 Time: 15:25 # 2 de Melo et al. Reducing Cognitive Load With Assistants This challenge is even more critical in military domains, where on users’ cognitive load from conversational assistants is still not warfighters are under increased (physical and cognitive) pressure well understood. and often face life and death situations (Kott and Alberts, 2017; A fundamental limitation of conversational assistants, TRADOC, 2018; Kott and Stump, 2019). Since the potential however, is their lack of embodiment and consequent costs of failure are higher, warfighters tend to be even more limited ability to communicate non-verbally. Non-verbal reluctant to trust and collaborate with AI (Gillis, 2017). For these communication plays an important role in regulating reasons, it is important to gradually increase exposure of AI social interaction (Boone and Buck, 2003). Expressions of technology to the warfighter through training that explains how emotion, additionally, serve important social functions such AI works, its strengths, but also its limitations. Complementary, as communicating one’s beliefs, desires, and intentions to it is fundamental that, during mission execution, AI is capable others (Frijda and Mesquita, 1994; Keltner and Lerner, 2010; of actively promoting trust and collaboration by communicating van Kleef et al., 2010; de Melo et al., 2014). The information naturally, effectively, and efficiently with the warfighter, while conveyed by non-verbal cues, therefore, can be very important minimizing the warfighter cognitive load. in building trust and promoting cooperation with humans Cognitive load is commonly defined as the difference (Bickmore and Cassell, 2001; Frank, 2004). Non-verbal between the cognitive demands of the task and the user’s communication in technology systems is typically achieved available cognitive resources (e.g., attention and memory) through robotic (Breazeal, 2003) or virtual agents (Gratch (Hart and Wickens, 1990; Nachreiner, 1995; Mackay, 2000). et al., 2002). Because these systems are embodied, they support Several factors have been identified that influence cognitive load non-verbal communication with users, including expression of but, broadly, it is possible to distinguish between exogenous emotion. Research shows that embodied conversational assistants factors (e.g., task difficulty) and endogenous factors (e.g., can have positive effects in human–machine interaction (Beale information processing capabilities for perceiving, planning, and and Creed, 2002; Beun et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2018b; Shamekhi decision making). Furthermore, individual factors, such as skill et al., 2018), including building rapport (Gratch et al., 2006) and experience, influence cognitive load. The importance of and promoting cooperation with users (de Melo et al., 2011; de controlling cognitive load for task performance has been studied Melo and Terada, 2019, 2020). In the context of problem-solving across several domains, with several studies suggesting that tasks, pedagogical agents have been shown to be able to improve increased cognitive load can undermine performance (Cinaz learning and task performance (Lester et al., 1997; Atkinson, et al., 2013; Dadashi et al., 2013; Vidulich and Tsang, 2014; 2002). These improvements are typically achieved through Fallahi et al., 2016). More recently, there has been increasing gestures that focus the user’s attention or through affective cues interest on the impact that technology has on worker’s cognitive serving specific pedagogical purposes, such as motivating the load. Much research has focused on the relationship between user (Schroeder and Adesope, 2014). Embodied conversational automation and user’s boredom and mental underload (Ryu assistants, therefore, hold the promise of having at least all and Myung, 2005), and its negative consequences on users’ the benefits in terms of task performance as (non-embodied) ability to react in a timely manner during real or simulated conversational assistants, while having minimal impact on the flight (Shively et al., 1987; Battiste and Bortolussi, 1988), user’s cognitive load. air combat (Bittner et al., 1989), air traffic control (Block With increased immersion afforded to the user (Dey et al., 2010), and so on. However, another concern is that et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018a), augmented reality (AR) has technology may increase user’s cognitive load due to the the potential to further enhance collaboration with AI. AR change of routine processes, stress due to the transition, and technology supports superimposition of virtual entities alongside general lack of understanding of how the technology works the physical space in the user’s field of view. Therefore, first, (Mackay, 2000). interaction with AI systems can occur as the user is fully Intelligent virtual assistants offer a promising route to immersed in the task and, second, virtual interfaces—such promote collaboration between humans and AI, while controlling as embodied assistants—can be integrated seamlessly in the the impact on the user’s cognitive load (Gratch et al., 2002). workspace. Increased user influence in AR environments often Conversational assistants—i.e., intelligent virtual assistants that occurs through an increased sense of social presence (Blascovich can communicate through natural language—have, in particular, et al., 2002). Kim et al.(2018b, 2019) investigated the effects of an been experiencing considerable commercial success—e.g., Apple embodied conversational assistant on the sense of social presence Siri, Amazon Alexa, and Microsoft Cortana (Hoy, 2018). The and confidence in the system and found that both factors basic premise is that advances in natural language processing positively impacted users’ perception of the system’s ability to be technology (Hirschberg and Manning, 2015) enable more aware