Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Battlefield Brook flows to the north of the site but does not preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus Site lies predominantly in Flood enter the site itself. Flood Zones 3a and 3b do not affect the climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. An FRA Land at Holdgate 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1, being marginally affected site. Flood Zone 2 affects a small part of the northern extent 3 1.12 Housing Battlefield Brook Yes 2 4 should asses local flood risk issues including the residual risk of blockage to the Drive, Sundorne 3a by Flood Zone 2 along the of the site. The watercourse is culverted beneath the A49 to A49 culvert. The resultant residual risk areas should inform the nature and layout northern boundary. the east of the site. Flood water may back-up behind this of the development, ideally with residual risk areas left as open space. culvert. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most The flows along the northern boundary of the site. vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zone 3a but there are Part of Municipal Site is affected by Flood Zones 2 areas (single-storey buildings etc.) no modelled Flood Zone maps for Flood Zone 3b, and Flood Golf Course, and 3a in the north eastern part As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 4 19.23 Housing Rea Brook Yes 3a only 2 Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. An unnamed drain flows along 3 Oteley Road, with the remainder of the site extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate the eastern boundary of the site and appears to be culverted located within Flood Zone 1. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent in places, posing a residual risk of blockage and/or collapse. of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. No Flood Zones have been produced for the drain. The FRA should also asses residual risk posed by culverted sections of the drain within the site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most Rea Brook flows through the southern part of the site in a vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk westerly direction exiting through a culvert beneath the areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Land off Site is affected by Flood Zones 2 railway on the western boundary. Modelled flood outlines As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Primrose Drive, and 3a in the southern extent. The exist for Flood Zone 3a but there are no modelled Flood Zone 5 3.51 Housing Rea Brook Yes 3a only 2 3 extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate , remainder of the site is located maps for Flood Zone 3b, and Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent Shrewsbury within Flood Zone 1. generated. There may be a residual risk of blockage and/or of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. collapse. The railway line may be acting as a barrier to The FRA should also asses residual risk which may arise as a result of a blockage floodplain flow which should be assessed as part of a FRA. to the culvert under the road. The residual risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most The Battlefield Brook flows through the centre of the site for vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk approximately 200m before forming the southern boundary of areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Approximately one-third of the site the site. Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zones 3a, 3a Land at As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 3b (25 year) is affected by Flood Zones 2, 3a Climate Change and 3b. Upstream of the site, the 6 Battlefield, 11.61 Employment Battlefield Brook Yes 2 3 extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate and 3a and 3b. The remainder of the site watercourse is culverted beneath Battlefield Way and water Shrewsbury change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk is located within Flood Zone 1. backs-up behind the road culvert. Along the eastern boundary areas should ideally remain as open space. The FRA should also asses the of the site, the watercourse is culverted beneath a railway line residual risk of blockage to both the upstream road culvert and downstream and water backs-up behind the structure. railway culvert. The resultant residual risk areas should inform the nature and layout of the development, ideally with residual risk areas left as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no An unnamed tributary of the flows in a northerly Site lies predominantly in Flood alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in direction along the eastern boundary of the site. JFLOW Tributary of the Zone 1. The eastern extent of the preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus 35 Land at Ford 6.7 Housing No No 2 & 3a Flood Zone information is misaligned at this location. 4 Severn site is affected by Flood Zones 2 climate change and 3b. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Watercourse is culverted beneath road at point it enters the and 3a. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above site. There may be residual risk posed to the site. points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Development if this site is suitable provided the flood risk areas remain as open space, which should be achievable given the size of the site. The The Rad Brook flows along the northern boundary of the site site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of with Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b extending into the northern the development located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey Site lies predominantly in Flood part of the site. Flood Zones 3a and 3b have been modelled Land at buildings etc.) 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1. The northern extent of the for the Rad Brook, but Flood Zone 2 is derived from JFLOW 40 Crowmeole/Upp 94.7 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 4 As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 3a site is affected by Flood Zones 2, and appears misaligned at this location. er Edgebold extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate 3a and 3b. A series of unnamed drains flow through the site and may be change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk culverted in places. No Flood Zones have been produced for areas should remain as open space. this watercourse, though in reality, some risk will be posed. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Development if this site is suitable provided the flood risk areas The Rad Brook issues within the site along the western remain as open space, which should be achievable given the size of the site. The boundary through a culvert beneath the A5 and flows in a site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of Site lies predominantly in Flood Land at Oak northerly direction before forming the eastern boundary of the the development located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1. Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b 48 Farm, Gains 60.69 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 site. Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b are available. Flood 4 buildings etc.) 3a affect the central parts of the site Park Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. An unnamed tributary of the As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify and along the eastern boundary. Rad Brook issues within the centre of the site. No Flood extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate Zones exist for this watercourse, in reality some risk is posed. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Minsterley Brook runs along the southern boundary of the site Land adj. to The but does not enter the site itself. Flood Zones 2 and 3 for this Given the flood risk posed to this site, development of housing on the site is not Site lies substantially within Flood 49 Grove, 1.38 Housing Brook No No 2 & 3a watercourse affect the majority of the site. A series of 2 suitable. Site which are located in Flood Zone 1 without recorded flood incidents Zones 2 and 3. Minsterley unnamed drains are located to the north of the site. These should be developed in preference to this site. may be culverted through part of the site.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there The Brook is located to the east of the site, flowing are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Site lies predominantly in Flood briefly through the south eastern corner of the site before Church Bridge Unnamed preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Zone 1, being marginally affected entering a culvert beneath the railway. The Flood Zone maps 50 Piece, 2.04 Housing Tributary of No No 2 & 3a 4 climate change and 3b. Residual risk posed by blockage of the culvert must be by Flood Zones 2 and 3 in the do not take into account the presence of the railway culvert. Dorrington assessed. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. south eastern part of the site. Flood Zone data is from JFLOW and misaligned adjacent to Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above the site. points.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there Land at The Site lies predominantly within are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Minsterley Brook flows along the eastern boundary of the site Grove, Flood Zone 1, being marginally preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus 111 2.62 Housing Minsterley Brook No No 2 & 3a but does not appear to enter the site itself. Flood Zones are 4 Minsterley (Also affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3 climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. misaligned. 94) along the eastern boundary. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. The FRA must verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus The Money Brook flows in a north westerly direction through climate change and 3b. The residual risk posed as a result of a potential blockage the site entering the site along the southern boundary through Site lies predominantly in Flood of the culver beneath the railway should be assessed. The resultant flood risk Land at Oteley a culvert beneath the A5 and exiting the site through a culvert Zone 1. The south western part of areas should remain as open space and the site should be developed 126 Road / A5 (Also 63.54 Housing Money Brook Yes 3a only 2 beneath the railway located along the western boundary, 4 the site is affected by Flood Zones sequentially, with the most vulnerable aspects of development placed furthest 145) posing a residual risk of blockage and/or collapse. An 2 and 3a. away from the flood risk areas (single-storey buildings etc). unnamed drain issues in the north of the site at SJ 4968 A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain 1037. should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

There is low confidence in the Flood Zones in this location - they are mis-aligned An unnamed drain is located to the west of the site but does from the channel. This site is deemed suitable for development provided it can be The northern half of the site is not enter the site itself. The drain may be culverted through demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 Land adj. to Hall affected by Flood Zone 2. The part of the site. Westbury Brook is located approximately which could be developed in preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of 135 2.95 Housing Westbury Brook No No 2 & 3a 4 Farm, Westbury remainder of the site is located 250m to the north west of the site. The Flood Zone 2 data is Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. Should any risk be presented within Flood Zone 1. derived from JFLOW and appears to be mis-aligned from the to the site, the resultant risk areas must remain as open space. channel in this location. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in An unnamed watercourse flows to the north west of the site Site lies predominantly in Flood preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Unnamed but does not enter the site itself. JFLOW generated Flood Land at Crosshill Zone 1. The northern part of the climate change and 3b. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. 139 46.79 Housing tributary of No No 2 & 3a Zones exist for the unnamed watercourse. An unnamed drain 4 Farm site is marginally affected by Flood A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain Severn is located in the centre of the site and appears to be culverted Zones 2 and 3a. should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). through part of the site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there A drain runs along the western boundary of the site but does are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in not enter the site itself. An additional unnamed rain is located Site lies predominantly in Flood preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus to the east of the site. This may be culverted within the site. Land at Zone 1, being marginally affected climate change and 3b. 147b 1.11 Housing Red Brook No No 2 & 3a No Flood Zones have been produced for the drains. The Rea 4 by Flood Zones 2 and 3a along the A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain Brook is located approximately 800m from the western site western boundary. should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). boundary. Flood Zones for this watercourse marginally affect Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above the site along the western boundary. points.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there An unnamed tributary of the Cound Brook flows along the Site lies predominantly in Flood are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Land South of Unnamed southern boundary of the site. Flood Zone maps are Zone 1, being marginally affected preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus 149 Dorrington (adj. 2.49 Housing Tributary of No No 2 & 3a misaligned in places. The Cound Brook flows to the east of 4 by Flood Zones 2 and 3 along the climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Falklands Road) Cound Brook the site with Flood Zones 2 and 3 marginally affecting the southern boundary of the site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above eastern corner of the site (JFLOW derived). points.

The River Severn is located approximately 30m from the Site is suitable for any use of development. eastern boundary of the site. Modelled Flood Zones 3a and As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Land at Hillside 3b for the River Severn extend to the site boundary but do not extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate Housing and 3b (25 yr) and 151 Drive, Belvidere, 2.04 River Severn Yes 2 Site lies fully in Flood Zone 1. enter the site itself. Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. A 5 change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). If flood risk is show to P.O.S 3a Shrewsbury railway line forms the southern boundary of the site. Flood affect the site, the resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. waters appear to back-up being the structure but spill onto Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above the left bank floodplain, away from the site. points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in The Rad Brook flows in an easterly direction forming part of preference. Development if this site is suitable provided the flood risk areas the northern boundary of the site. For the part of the site on remain as open space, which should be achievable given the size of the site. The the left bank of the Rad Brook, approximately half of the site site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of is located within Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b. The part of the the development located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey Site lies predominantly in Flood site on the right bank of the Rad Brook is only marginally buildings etc.) Land at 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1 however, the northern part affected by Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b. Flood Zones 3a and 155 42.1 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 4 As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Bowbrook 3a of the site is affected by Flood 3b have been modelled for the Rad Brook. However there is extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate Zones 2, 3a and 3b. no modelled Flood Zone 2 and the existing Flood Zone 2 change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk appears misaligned at this location. An unnamed drain is areas should remain as open space. located in the south eastern part of the site. No Flood Zones A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain have been produced for this watercourse. In reality some risk should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). is posed. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no An unnamed minor watercourse flows in a southerly direction alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Site lies predominantly in Flood outside of the southern boundary of the site. Flood Zone preference. Land at Zone 1, being only marginally 166 3.69 Housing Unnamed drain No No 2 & 3a information for the unnamed watercourse is misaligned in this 4 An FRA must confirm the levels and extents of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate Nesscliffe affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3a area. A small water body is located to the south east of the change and 3b, to determine the actual level of risk posed. at the south western corner. site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table Battlefield Brook is located to the south of the site but does D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most not enter the site itself. Modelled Flood Zones for Flood vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk The Grove, 84 Site lies mainly in Flood Zone 1 3b (25 year) Zones 3a and 3b have been produced and do not affect the areas (single-storey buildings etc.) 176 Battlefield Road, 0.8 Housing Battlefield Brook Yes 2 but is affected on the southern 4 and 3a site. Flood Zone 2 has been produced using JFLOW. An As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Shrewsbury boundary by Flood Zone 2. unnamed tributary of the Battlefield Brook is located to the extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate west of the site. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should ideally remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this An unnamed tributary of Row Book is located approximately site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table 60m from the western boundary of the site. JFLOW Land at Denver Unnamed D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most Site is equally affected by Flood generated Flood Zones exist for this watercourse which 198a House, Acton 0.07 Housing Tributary of Row No No 2 & 3a 3 vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Zones 1, 2 and 3. appear misaligned in places. Lilly Pool is located to the north Burnell Brook areas (single-storey buildings etc.) east of the site. The outfall from this pool flows in a north As JFLOW has been used to produce the Flood Zones, an FRA must verify easterly direction away from the site. extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should ideally remain as open space.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Land at The Unnamed Site lies almost fully in Flood Zone Site lies adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Row Brook. preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus 198b Radnals, Acton 0.26 Housing Tributary of Row No No 2 & 3a 1, but the north western tip of the JFLOW generated Flood Zones exist for this watercourse 4 climate change and 3b. Burnell Brook site lies in Flood Zone 2. which appear misaligned in places. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Flood Zone 2 affects the north The River Severn is located approximately 70m from the As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Land at 3b (25 yr) and eastern part of the site. The western boundary of the site but does not enter the site itself. extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate 214 1.404 Housing River Severn Yes 2 4 Monkmoor Road 3a remainder of the site is located Modelled Flood Zones are available for Flood Zone 3a and change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk within Flood Zone 1. 3b. Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. areas should ideally remain as open space. However, given the extent of Flood Zone 2 within the site, this may not be possible. Any development within Flood Zone 2 should therefore follow the advice for 'development in Flood Zone 2', taking into account the above points.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there The Cound Brook forms the south eastern boundary of the are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in The eastern part of the site is Unnamed site, issuing on the southern corner of the site from a culvert preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Land adj. Station affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3. 216 3.71 Housing Tributary of No No 2 & 3a beneath the railway. Flood Zone maps for this watercourse 4 climate change and 3b. Residual risk posed by blockage of the culvert must be Road, Dorrington The remainder of the site is Cound Brook are misaligned. A drain joins the right bank of the Cound assessed. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. located within Flood Zone 1. Brook outside of the north eastern boundary of the site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Only a small part of the site is located within Flood Zone 2 and this The Battlefield Brook is located to the west of the site but has been generated by JFLOW, therefore the FRA should confirm the flood does not enter the site itself. Modelled Flood Zones are extents and levels of risk posed by the 1000 year event. The resultant parts of the Site lies predominantly in Flood River available for Flood Zones 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. site affected by Flood Zone 2 should be left as open space. 3b (25yr) and Zone 1, being only marginally 219 Land at Uffington 4.414 Housing Severn/Battlefiel Yes 2 Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. The River Severn is 4 A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drains 3a affected by Flood Zone 2 at the d Brook located to the south west of the site. A disused canal and a should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). southern boundary. series of drains are located to the east of the site. An The embankment appears to have an impounding effect on flood waters, therefore embankment forms the western boundary of the site. the residual risk to the site from potential breach or overtopping of the embankment should be assessed as part of a FRA. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Development if this site is suitable provided the flood risk areas The Rea Brook flows along the northern boundary of the site remain as open space, which should be achievable given the size of the site. The but does not enter the site itself. Modelled flood outlines exist site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of Site lies predominantly within for Flood Zone 3a but there are no modelled Flood Zone Land at Sutton the development located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey Flood Zone 1, being marginally maps for Flood Zone 3b, and Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW 221 Grange, Oteley 10.98 Housing Rea Brook Yes 3a only 2 4 buildings etc.) affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3a generated. An unnamed watercourse issues within the site at Road As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify along the northern boundary. SJ 5019 1054 and flowing in a north easterly direction extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate towards the . No Flood Zone maps have been change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent produced for this watercourse. of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Part of an unnamed tributary of the Battlefield Brook flows Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no Land at Site lies predominantly in Flood along the northern boundary of the site. This watercourse is alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Battlefield 3b (25 year) Zone 1. The northern extent of the culverted in places to the east of the site but not within the preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zone 2. The 227 0.683 Housing Battlefield Brook Yes 2 4 Garage, and 3a site is affected by Flood Zones 2, site itself. Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zones 3a, resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Shrewsbury 3a and 3b. 3a Climate Change and 3b for the Battlefield Brook and its Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above adjoining tributary. points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Given the flood risk to the site and the number of recorded incidents of historical fluvial flooding along the eastern boundary of the site, alternative sites fully in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. If it is demonstrated The River Severn is located approximately 140m to the east that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1, this site can be of the site but does not enter the site itself. Modelled Flood developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25. Site is marginally affected by Zones are available for Flood Zone 3a and 3b. Flood Zone 2 Land at Coton As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 3b (25yr) and Flood Zones 2 and 3. The is JFLOW generated. A series of drains are located along the 228 Farm, Brompton, 3.216 Housing River Severn Yes 2 4 extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate 3a remainder of the site is located northern and eastern boundaries of the site. No Flood Zone Cross Houses change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event, which should ideally within Flood Zone 1. data has been produced for these drains. Historic flood remain as open space). All flood risk areas should remain as open space. outlines indicate the eastern part of the site has been affected A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drains by fluvial flooding on a number of occasions. should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

As a large part of the site is affected by Flood Zone 2 and historic flood outlines indicate the western part of the site has been affected by fluvial flooding, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also Over half of the site is affected by The River Severn is located approximately 13m to the west of be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of the development Flood Zone 2. Flood Zones 3a and the site but does not enter the site itself. Modelled Flood located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey buildings etc.) 3b (25yr) and 237 Land at Uffington 0.666 Housing River Severn Yes 2 3b affect the western extent of the Zones are available for Flood Zone 3a and 3b. Flood Zone 2 3 As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 3a site. The remainder of the site is is JFLOW generated. Historic flood outlines indicate that part extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate located within Flood Zone 1. of the site has been affected by fluvial flooding. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should ideally remain as open space, however, given the extent of Flood Zone 2 within the site, this may not be possible. Any development within Flood Zone 2 should therefore follow the advice for 'development in Flood Zone 2', with the remaining risk areas left as open space (Flood Zones 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b).

There is low confidence in the Flood Zones in this location - they are mis-aligned An unnamed drain is located to the west of the site but does from the channel. However, this site is deemed suitable for development provided Site is substantially affected by not enter the site itself. The drain may be culverted through it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Flood Zone 2. A small part of the Land adj. to Hall part of the site. Westbury Brook is located approximately Zone 1 which could be developed in preference, and an FRA verifies extents and 238 0.87 Housing Westbury Brook No No 2 & 3a northern and southern extents of 3 Farm, Westbury 250m to the north west of the site. The Flood Zone 2 data is levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. Should any risk be the site are located within Flood derived from JFLOW and appears to be mis-aligned from the presented to the site, the resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Zone 1. channel in this location. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no An unnamed tributary of the River Severn is located along the alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in western boundary with an additional unnamed drain flowing preference. As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must through the western part of the site before being culverted Site lies fully in Flood Zone 1, verify extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of beneath the road which runs parallel to the southern 3b (25yr) and though Flood Zone 2 marginally climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant 243 Land at 0.387 Housing River Severn Yes 2 boundary. Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b for the River 5 3a affects the site on the southern flood risk areas should remain as open space. Severn do not affect the site. Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW boundary. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drains generated and marginally extends to the southern boundary should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). of the site. No Flood Zones exist for the unnamed drains, Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above although in reality some risk is posed. points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. The flood affected areas to the east of the site must remain as open The River Severn is located to the south west of the site but space. The site should be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable Flood Zone 2 affects the southern does not enter the site itself. Modelled Flood Zones are aspects of development placed furthest away from the flood risk areas (single- Land rear of 3b (25 yr) and part of the site. The remainder of available for Flood Zones 3a and 3b. Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW storey buildings etc). 270 Sundorne T.A. 2.264 Housing River Severn Yes 2 4 3a the site is located within Flood generated. A disused canal is located along the southern As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Centre Zone 1. boundary of the site and an unnamed drain can be found to extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate the west of the site. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

There is low confidence in the Flood Zones in this location - they are mis-aligned from the channel. This site is nonetheless deemed suitable for development An unnamed drain is located to the west of the site but does Site is substantially affected by provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in not enter the site itself. The drain may be culverted through Flood Zone 2. A small part of the Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference, and an FRA verifies Land adj. Hall part of the site. Westbury Brook is located approximately 277 1.347 Housing Westbury Brook No No 2 & 3a northern and southern extents of 3 extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. Should Farm, Westbury 250m to the north west of the site. The Flood Zone 2 data is the site are located within Flood any risk be presented to the site, the resultant risk areas must remain as open derived from JFLOW and appears to be mis-aligned from the Zone 1. space. channel in this location. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most Site is affected by Flood Zones 2 An unnamed tributary of the Rea Brook flows along the vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Land at Hook-a- Tributary of Rea and 3a along the southern 286a 0.298 Housing No No 2 & 3a southern boundary of the site. JFLOW generated Flood Zone 4 areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Gate Brook boundary. The remainder of the data with misalignments evident along the watercourse. As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2 and 3a, an FRA must site is located within Flood Zone 1. therefore verify extents and levels of these Flood Zones, as well as assess the impact of climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most Approximately 50% of the site is An unnamed tributary of the Rea Brook flows along the vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Land at Hook-a- Tributary of Rea located within Flood Zones 2 and 286b 0.313 Housing No No 2 & 3a northern boundary of the site. JFLOW generated Flood Zone 3 areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Gate Brook 3a. The remainder of the site lies data with misalignments evident along the watercourse. As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2 and 3a, an FRA must within Flood Zone 1. therefore verify extents and levels of these Flood Zones, as well as assess the impact of climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most The northern third of the site is An unnamed tributary of the Rea Brook flows along the vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Land at Hook-a- Tributary of Rea affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3a. 286c 0.454 Housing No No 2 & 3a northern boundary of the site. JFLOW generated Flood Zone 4 areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Gate Brook The remainder of the site lies data with misalignments evident along the watercourse. As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2 and 3a, an FRA must within Flood Zone 1. therefore verify extents and levels of these Flood Zones, as well as assess the impact of climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in An unnamed watercourse runs along the western boundary of preference. An FRA must verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Site lies predominantly within Land at Hall the site. JFLOW modelled outlines exist for part of the climate change and 3b. If Flood Zones 2 and 3 are shown to affect the site, these Tributary of Rea Flood Zone 1 with the northern 295 Bank, 1.321 Housing No No 2 & 3a watercourse but these are significantly misaligned and do not 4 should remain as open space. The FRA should also assess the residual risk Brook part of the site affected by Flood take into account the presence of the culvert beneath the posed arising from a blockage of the culvert beneath the road. The resultant Zones 2 and 3a. dismantled railway. residual risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this The Battlefield Brook forms the southern boundary of the site. site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table The watercourse exits a railway culvert just upstream of the D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most site. A railway line runs along the western boundary of the vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Site lies predominantly in Flood site. Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zones 3a, 3a areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Land at 3b (25 year) Zone 1. The southern extent of the 330 6.421 Housing Battlefield Brook Yes 2 Climate Change and 3b and indicate that floodwater backs- 4 As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Battlefield and 3a site is affected by Flood Zones 2, up upstream of the western boundary of the site behind the extents and levels of the 1000 year event. The FRA should asses the residual risk 3a and 3b. railway. With climate change, the risk to the site increases. posed to the site from a potential blockage of both the railway and the culverts The Battlefield Brook is culverted beneath Battlefield Road to located to the south of the site. All flood risk areas should then remain as open the south of the site. space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to the entire site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. If it is demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1, this site can be Site lies fully in Flood Zone 2, An unnamed watercourse is culverted beneath Woodcote developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25. Land at 3b (25 yr) and being marginally affected by Flood Way before forming the eastern boundary of the site. The As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 339a Woodcote Way, 1.9 Housing River Severn Yes 2 3 3a Zones 3a and 3b along the south River Severn is located approximately 260m to the west of extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate Shrewsbury eastern boundary. the site. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event, which should ideally remain as open space). Guidelines for development in Flood Zone 2 should be followed, taking into account the above points.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to the entire site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. If it is demonstrated that Site is substantially affected by The River Severn is located to the north east of the site but there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1, this site can be Land at Flood Zone 2. The northern part of does not enter the site itself. An unnamed watercourse is 3b (25 yr) and developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25. 339b Woodcote Way, 2.13 Housing River Severn Yes 2 the site is affected by Flood Zones located outside of the western boundary of the site. The OS 3 3a As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Shrewsbury 3a and 3b. Only a small part of the map indicates there may be additional drains culverted extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate site is located within Flood Zone 1. through the site which issue outside the western boundary. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event, which should ideally remain as open space).

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there Site lies predominantly within are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Land at Minsterley Brook parallel to the eastern boundary of the site Flood Zone 1, being marginally preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus 341 Wagbeach, Nr. 0.069 Housing Minsterley Brook No No 2 & 3a but does not enter the site itself. Existing Flood Zones are 4 affected by Flood Zones 2 and 3 climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Minsterley JFLOW and misaligned. along the eastern boundary. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there The Rad Brook flows in an easterly direction along the Site lies predominantly in Flood are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Land adj. northern boundary of the site. Flood Zones 3a and 3b have 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1. The northern extent of the preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus 517a Road, 0.716 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 been modelled and marginally affect the site along the 4 3a site is affected by Flood Zones 2, climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Shrewsbury northern boundary. There is no modelled Flood Zone 2 data 3a and 3b. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above for this area and the Flood Zones appear misaligned. points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there The Rad Brook flows in an easterly direction along the Site lies predominantly in Flood are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Land adj. northern boundary of the site. Flood Zones 3a and 3b have 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1. The northern extent of the preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2 and 3a plus 517b Longden Road, 0.784 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 been modelled and marginally affect the site along the 4 3a site is affected by Flood Zones 2, climate change. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Shrewsbury northern boundary. There is no modelled Flood Zone 2 data 3a and 3b. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above for this area and the Flood Zones appear misaligned. points.

Given the flood risk posed to the site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk The River Severn is located approximately 90m from the areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Site lies predominantly in Flood western boundary of the site. The site itself is almost entirely Land at 3b (25yr) and As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 529 0.896 Housing River Severn Yes 2 Zone 2. Only a small part of the affected by Flood Zone 2. Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b 3 Grange Farm 3a extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate site is located in Flood Zone 1. for the River Severn do not affect the site. Flood Zone 2 is change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk JFLOW generated. areas should ideally remain as open space, however, given the extent of Flood Zone 2 within the site, this may not be possible. Any development within Flood Zone 2 should therefore follow the advice for 'development in Flood Zone 2', with the remaining risk areas left as open space (3a plus climate change, if it is shown to affect the site).

This site is suitable for all types of development. As JFLOW has been used to The River Severn is located approximately 30m from the produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must verify extents and levels of the 1000 year Land at The western site boundary but does not enter the site itself. event, as well as assess the impact of climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + 3b (25yr) and 532 Mount, 2.348 Housing River Severn Yes 2 Site lies fully in Flood Zone 1. Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b do not extend to the site, 5 climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open 3a Shrewsbury however JFLOW generated Flood Zone 2 extends close to space. the western and northern site boundaries. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. In addition, the flood affected areas to the east of the site must remain as open space. The site should be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable aspects of development placed furthest away from the flood risk areas The River Severn is located along the eastern boundary of Site lies predominantly in Flood (single-storey buildings etc). the site but does not enter the site itself. A drain issues in the 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1. Much of the eastern As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 533 Land at Weir Hill 61.91 Housing River Severn Yes 2 northern part of the site and may be culverted through the 4 3a extent of the site is affected by extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate site. An additional unnamed drain is located along the Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk southern boundary of the site. areas should remain as open space. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference to this site. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this site is required for development, it The River sever flows to the west of the site but does not must be developed in accordance with Table D3 of PPS25 - the site should also enter the site itself. An unnamed drain flows through the be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of the development northern part of the site before exiting on the western The northern and western parts of located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey buildings etc.) boundary and joining the River sever on the left bank. the site are affected by Flood Zone As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b for the River Severn extend Land at Preston 2 (approximately one third of the extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate 3b (25 yr) and to the site boundary, marginally affecting the site in some 534 Roundabout, 23.52 Housing River Severn Yes 2 site) and marginally by Flood 3 change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk 3a locations along the western boundary. Flood Zone 2 is Shrewsbury Zones 3a and 3b. The remainder areas should ideally remain as open space, however, given the extent of Flood JFLOW generated and covers around a third of the site. A of the site is located within Flood Zone 2 within the site, this may not be possible. Any development within Flood drain issues to the south of the site but does not enter the site Zone 1. Zone 2 should therefore follow the advice for 'development in Flood Zone 2', with itself. Historical flood outlines indicate that the far western the remaining risk areas left as open space (Flood Zones 3a, 3a plus climate extent of the site has been marginally affected by fluvial change and 3b). flooding in the past. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m).

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in The southern part of the site is Land adj. The An unnamed tributary of the Rea Brook flows along the preference. The FRA must verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Tributary of Rea marginally affected by Flood 564 Bungalow, Hook- 0.139 Housing No No 2 & 3a southern boundary of the site. JFLOW generated Flood Zone 4 climate change and 3b. If Flood Zones 2 and 3 are shown to affect the site, these Brook Zones 2 and 3a. The remainder of a-Gate data with misalignments evident along the watercourse. should remain as open space. the site lies within Flood Zone 1. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this The Rea Brook flows along the northern boundary of the site. site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zone 3a but there are D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most no modelled Flood Zone maps for Flood Zone 3b, and Flood Land at Pulley Site is affected by Flood Zone 2 vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. Two unnamed drains issue Lane, and 3a along the northern half of areas (single-storey buildings etc.) 575 17.67 Housing Rea Brook Yes 3a only 2 within the site, flowing through the eastern and central parts 4 Shrewsbury the site. The remainder of the site As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify of the site. No Flood Zone maps have been produced for (shared option) is located within Flood Zone 1. extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate these watercourses though in reality some flood risk is posed. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent Historic flood outlines indicate the northern part of the site of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. was affected by flooding in November 2000. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drains should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m).

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. In addition, the flood affected areas to the east of the site must remain as open space. The site should be developed sequentially, with the most The River Severn forms the eastern boundary of the site. vulnerable aspects of development placed furthest away from the flood risk areas Modelled Flood Zones 3a and 3b for the River Severn extend (single-storey buildings etc). Housing and Site is marginally affected by into the north eastern part of the site. Flood Zone 2 is JFLOW Land at London 3b (25 yr) and As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify 607 21.92 Mixed Use River Severn Yes 2 Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b along generated and affects the eastern part of the site. An 4 Road 3a extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate (Emp., P&R) the eastern boundary. unnamed drain issues along the northern boundary of the change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk site. No Flood Zones exist for this drain, however, in reality areas should remain as open space. some risk is posed. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drain should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points. Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this The Rea Brook flows along the southern boundary of the site site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table Site lies substantially in Flood but does not enter the site itself. Modelled flood outlines exist D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most Land at Redhill Zones 2 and 3a. Only a small part for Flood Zone 3a but there are no modelled Flood Zone vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk 613 Mil, nr. 1.437 Non-specific Rea Brook Yes Only 3a 2 2 of the site is located within Flood maps for Flood Zone 2. Historic flood outlines indicate the areas (single-storey buildings etc.) Hookagate Zone 1. southern part of the site was affected by fluvial flooding in Flood Zones have been derived using JFLOW and are deemed to be of poor November 2000. quality in this area, therefore an FRA is required to verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus climate change and 3b. Resultant flood risk areas should ideally remain as open space.

Westbury Brook is located along the southern boundary of This site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there the site, forming the site boundary for a short distance before are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Site lies predominantly in Flood being culverted beneath the B4387. Flood Zones 2 and 3a preference, and an FRA verifies extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus Land at 617 4.435 Housing Westbury Brook No No 2 & 3a Zone 1, being marginally affected marginally affect the south eastern corner of the site. Flood 4 climate change and 3b. Residual risk posed by blockage of the culvert must be Westbury by Flood Zones 2 and 3a. Zone maps for this watercourse are misaligned. A small water assessed. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. body is located just outside the north eastern corner of the Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above site. points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in preference. Development if this site is suitable provided the flood risk areas remain as open space, which should be achievable given the size of the site. The The Rad Brook flows in an easterly direction along the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most vulnerable elements of Site lies predominantly in Flood northern boundary of the site. Flood Zones 3a and 3b have Land at Mytton the development located furthest away from flood risk areas (single-storey 3b (25 yr) and Zone 1 being only marginally been modelled and marginally affect the site along the 618 Oak Road, 10.19 Housing Rad Brook Yes 2 4 buildings etc.) 3a affected by Flood Zones 3a and 3b northern boundary. There is no modelled Flood Zone 2 data Shrewsbury As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify along the north western boundary. for this area and the Flood Zones appear misaligned. Two extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate small water bodies are located within the site. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no Site lies predominantly in Flood There are no watercourses within the site although Flood alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Unnamed Land at Cross Housing and Zone 1. Flood Zone 2 marginally Zone 2 of an unnamed watercourse appears to affect part of preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus 625 52.02 tributary of No No 2 & 3a 4 Hill Employment affects the western extent of the the western edge of the site. A water body is located to the climate change and 3b. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. Severn site. north of the site but is outside of the site boundary. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.

Given the degree of flood risk posed to this site, alternative sites in Flood Zone 1 should be developed in preference. Should the Sequential Test indicate that this The Rea Brook flows along the northern boundary of the site. site is required for development, it must be developed in accordance with Table Modelled flood outlines exist for Flood Zone 3a but there are D3 of PPS25 - the site should also be developed sequentially, with the most no modelled Flood Zone maps for Flood Zone 3b, and Flood Land at Pulley Site is affected by Flood Zone 2 vulnerable elements of the development located furthest away from flood risk Housing and Zone 2 is JFLOW generated. Two unnamed drains issue Lane, and 3a along the northern half of areas (single-storey buildings etc.) 628 17.67 Retirement Rea Brook Yes 3a only 2 within the site, flowing through the eastern and central parts 4 Shrewsbury the site. The remainder of the site As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must therefore verify Community of the site. No Flood Zone maps have been produced for (shared option) is located within Flood Zone 1. extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of climate these watercourses though in reality some flood risk is posed. change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event) and determine the extent Historic flood outlines indicate the northern part of the site of Flood Zone 3b. The resultant flood risk areas should remain as open space. was affected by flooding in November 2000. A development easement for development from the top of the bank of the drains should be negotiated with the EA (typically 8m). Appendix A Assessment of Flood Risk Posed to Potential Site Allocations

Site Area Development Modelled JFLOW Flood Risk Suitability Number Site Location Watercourse Model? Site Overview Site Description Recommendations (Ha) Type outlines? outlines? Criteria

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no Coundmoor Brook flows along the western boundary of the Site lies predominantly in Flood alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in Coundmoor site but does not enter the site itself. JFLOW Flood Zone Zone 1. Flood Zone 2 marginally preference. An FRA should verify extents and levels of Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3a plus 629 Land at Cound 1.185 Housing Brook (tributary No No 2 & 3a information is misaligned at this location. Upstream of the 4 affects the western extent of the climate change and 3b. The resultant risk areas must remain as open space. of Severn) site, the Coundmoor Brook flows into a pond at Cove site. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above Coppice. points.

Site is suitable for development provided it can be demonstrated that there are no alternative sites available fully in Flood Zone 1 which could be developed in The River Severn flows to the west of the site but does not preference. As JFLOW has been used to produce Flood Zone 2, an FRA must Land at Ferry Site lies predominantly in Flood 3b (25 yr) and enter the site itself. Historic records of flooding indicate the verify extents and levels of the 1000 year event, as well as assess the impact of 632 Fields, 0.66 Housing River Severn Yes 2 Zone 1. The western part of the 4 3a far western extent of the site was affected by fluvial flooding climate change (i.e. model the 100 year + climate change event). The resultant site is affected by Flood Zone 2. in 2002. flood risk areas should remain as open space. Follow guidance for development in Flood Zone 1, taking into account the above points.