Use Style: Paper Title

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use Style: Paper Title Investigation of offshore wind farm layouts regarding wake effects and cable topology Bryce Wade [email protected] Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal October 2018 Abstract— Offshore wind energy is emerging as a large rectilinear form where turbines are spaced evenly along contributor to installed renewable energy capacity. In order to columns and rows. This is the case for many notable large continue the momentum of its development, the offshore wind projects such as Horns Rev, London Array, Gemini Wind Farm industry is looking to continually lower the levelized cost of and Dudgeon. electricity (LCOE). One area being explored in an effort to lower Wind farm designers have considered the value of the LCOE of offshore wind generation is the optimization of the minimizing wake effects, as the rows and columns of wind wind farm layout. Many of the offshore wind farm layout designs that exist today are structured in a rectilinear form where turbines farms are often oriented into an optimal direction based on the are spaced evenly along columns and rows. This thesis explores the local wind climate. However, the inconsistent nature of economic advantages of removing rectilinear constraints and environmental factors such as the local wind climate, optimizing the positions of the individual turbines within an bathymetry, and soil types would conclude that these are not offshore wind farm. driving factors in the structured layouts. At the core of achieving the thesis objective was the development It has been hypothesized through many academic research of a model that is capable of simulating an existing offshore wind efforts that keeping rectilinear formats may cost a great deal farm by converting representative wind farm data into an LCOE. when measuring the annual energy production over the lifetime The positions of the turbines within the wind farm can be modified of the windfarm [3]. using an optimization framework with the intent to minimize the LCOE. The model comprised of the Jensen Wake Model, a hybrid When determining the spacing between turbines in an cable layout heuristic and an NREL cost scaling model. The wind offshore windfarm layout, there are two key parameters that farm layout was optimized using a genetic algorithm. oppose with regards to profitability; wake effects and the The cost estimation model and optimization framework were collection cable length. As the turbine spacing increases, the applied into two case studies to analyze the results of the wind farm wake effects decrease which results in an increase in the annual layout optimization of two wind farms, Horns Rev and Borssele. energy production. Though increased space between turbines In both case studies the optimized layouts provided higher AEP, results in longer collection cables and in turn, higher shorter intra-array collection cable lengths and ultimately a lower transmission losses and increased cable costs. The opposing LCOE than the baseline rectilinear layouts. nature of these design variables result in some layouts being more profitable than others. Abandoning the rectilinear constraints described above and Keywords- Offshore Wind Energy, Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problem, Wake Effects, Cable Topology, Genetic Algorithm understanding how the wake effect and cable cost variables are related can be utilized in the wind farm design process to I. INTRODUCTION improve the economic viability of offshore wind development. A. Background B. Project Objective Developing carbon free sources of electricity has become a This work explores the advantages of optimizing the global focus in recent decades. As the understanding of the positions of the individual turbines within an offshore wind importance of this shift within the energy sector spreads, farm. The optimization seeks to minimize the objective increased interest and investment have been directed towards function which is LCOE of an offshore wind farm. At the core renewable energy sources in an effort to expedite the transition. of this work was the development of a model that is capable of Wind energy is a leading technology in the development of the following: large-scale renewable energy generation and is a significant • Simulating an existing offshore wind farm by percentage of the electricity generation of many nations. [1] [2] converting necessary input data into a representative Offshore wind energy in particular is an emerging technology LCOE. that is becoming increasingly viable as improvements in technology are driving down the levelized cost of electricity • Providing the ability to optimize the positions of the (LCOE) making it more competitive with onshore wind individual turbines within the wind farm in order to technology and other forms of electricity generation. lower the LCOE. One particular area being explored in an effort to lower the • Providing the ability to perform sensitivity analysis for LCOE of offshore wind generation is the optimization of the different input parameters for the offshore wind farm wind farm layout. There are multiple parameters that are that can provide insight to the importance of the considered when designing a wind farm array including but not different design variables. limited to: wake effects, wind profile, bathymetry, soil types, The model was validated using measured data from an cable installation costs, transmission losses, environmental existing wind farm. Upon validation, the model was used to concerns, permitting restrictions and aesthetics. While estimate the difference in LCOE’s for different wind farms with acknowledging these parameters, many of the resulting wind the existing and optimized wind farm layouts and conclusions farm layout designs that exist today are structured in a were drawn from the results. 1 II. STATE OF THE ART in WFLOP are focused on improving the formulations A wind farm consists of an array of wind turbines that describing the expected energy conversion of the wind farm, the convert the kinetic energy from the wind to electricity. Wind wind turbine wakes and turbulence impacts, the wind turbine turbines can be arranged within a wind farm in a certain structural fatigue and degradation, the various types of orientation in order to increase the energy the wind farm yields. environmental impacts, the overall electrical system losses and Traditional layouts are typically in a rectilinear format, reliability and the uncertainty and risk management. identifiable by the turbine’s arrangement in equally spaced rows and columns. The majority of the largest wind farms in III. MODEL DEVELOPMENT operation today are in a grid format, rotated in an orientation with respect to the wind direction to maximize energy yield (for The objective of the model optimization, as previously the set formation). However there has been a growing field of stated, is to optimize the positions of the turbines within a wind research into truly maximizing the energy yield for a given farm in an effort to minimize the LCOE. There are two variables wind farm site by abandoning the rectilinear constraints. The within Equation 1 that are dependent on the positions of the area of this research has been termed the Wind Farm Layout turbines (all else were considered independent within this Optimization Problem (WFLOP) where interested parties are work); Initial Capital Costs (ICC) and the annual energy creating models and using optimization algorithms to better production (AEP). More specifically within the ICC, it is the understand how different wind farm orientations can provide intra-array cable costs that are dependent on the wind turbine higher energy yields under different environmental and positions. physical circumstances. [3] 퐼퐶퐶 ∗ 퐹퐶푅 (1) 퐿퐶푂퐸 = + 퐴푂퐸 퐴퐸푃 A. Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problem The WFLOP requires a defined objective function and an The modelling framework developed in this work is explained optimization strategy. The objective function is calculated easiest by breaking down the three core components. The based on the design parameters, and is minimized through physical component included sub-models that provided optimization of the wind farm design. collection cable lengths and annual energy production for a The optimization strategies use algorithms that iterate given wind farm based on its layout. The economic component through various scenarios in search of satisfying constraints and utilized the cable length and AEP to generate an LCOE. The minimizing the objective function. The optimization algorithms optimization component used the LCOE as its objective can be categorized into gradient methods [4], genetic function and modified the turbine positions in search of an algorithms [5] [6], viral algorithms [7], particle swarm optimal layout. algorithms [8] and greedy heuristic algorithms [9]. [10] A. Physical Component The WFLOP was first explored by Mosetti et al. [5] in 1994 The physical component accounts for the environmental and by considering a wind farm that did not have a defined desired physical characteristics of the wind farm and provides the power output, but a fixed number of potential turbine positions. annual energy production and collection cable layout. The two The wind farm consisted of a 10x10 grid where the wind turbine core sub-models within the physical component pertain to the could be placed in the center of each quadrant or not, in search wake effects and the cable topology. of the most profitable design based on the objective function. Since the work of Mosetti et al. there have been numerous 1) Wake Effects attempts to determine the best methods for designing a wind As a turbine extracts energy from the wind and converts it to farm layout. The research that followed Mosetti et al. can electrical energy, it leaves a wake behind which is characterized largely be categorized into two paths: (1) a track focused on the by reduced wind speeds and increased turbulence in the flow development and testing of different optimization strategies i.e. [13]. The wake from a turbine expands and gradually returns to optimization algorithms, [6] [8] [9] and (2) a track focused on the free stream condition as it continues downstream.
Recommended publications
  • OFFSHORE WIND INDUSTRY to Take a at the EWEA in Barcelona, and Not Just There
    www.offshorewindindustry.com · Issue 2014 · No. 02 · € 24 Powered by OffshoreWIND INDUSTRY Connection established At times, connecting offshore wind farms to the grid poses a real challenge. However, technical solutions do exist, and there are many manufacturers that offer them. PORTS SAFETY CONTRACTING Special economic Patient One-stop conditions stabilised solution Innovative marine and offshore solutions Drilling and piling of large Installation works with diameter monopiles jack-up platforms Wind turbine erection Accommodation units Grouting activities EPCI contracts Offshore site investigation Directional drilling Jacket installation Foundation and wind turbine (pre-piling / post-piling) maintenance and repair services Foundation and wind Installation of turbine logistics transition pieces GeoSea nv Haven 1025 – Scheldedijk 30 B-2070 Zwijndrecht, Belgium T +32 3 250 53 12 F +32 3 250 55 41 [email protected] www.deme-group.com/geosea member of the Deme Group Adv140515_OffshoreWindIndustry_200x280mm_final.indd 1 15/05/2014 16:11:22 editorial Looking across the borders he days when each country could do its not happen. Load fluctuations could be compensated own thing in the offshore wind sector for, wind energy generation in strong winds would not T are over. Due to the massive expansion have to be throttled back and an integrated European in European waters, the industry is becoming increas- electricity market would stabilise the market prices for ingly international. For example, individual countries EU electricity. do not always have a suitable port that can serve as a The Kriegers Flak installation site is demonstrating base for construction or maintenance work. An optimal how things could work in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of O&M of Offshore Wind
    FACULTY MECHANICAL, MARITIME AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING Delft University of Technology Department Marine and Transport Technology Mekelweg 2 2628 CD Delft the Netherlands Phone +31 (0)15-2782889 Fax +31 (0)15-2781397 www.mtt.tudelft.nl Specialization: Transport Engineering and Logistics Report number: 2017.TEL.8167 Title: Optimization of O&M of offshore wind farms Author: J.P.R. Triepels Title (in Dutch) Optimalisatie van O&M van offshore windparken Assignment: Literature project Confidential: no Supervisor: Dr. ir. X. Jiang Date: August 1st, 2017 This report consists of 42 pages and 4 appendices. It may only be reproduced literally and as a whole. For commercial purposes only with written authorization of Delft University of Technology. Requests for consult are only taken into consideration under the condition that the applicant denies all legal rights on liabilities concerning the contents of the advice. FACULTY OF MECHANICAL, MARITIME AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING Delft University of Technology Department of Marine and Transport Technology Mekelweg 2 2628 CD Delft the Netherlands Phone +31 (0)15-2782889 Fax +31 (0)15-2781397 www.mtt.tudelft.nl Student: Assignment type: Review Supervisor: Dr.ir. Jiang Report number: 2017.TEL.xxxx Specialization: TEL Confidential: Creditpoints (EC): 10 Subject: Deployment of big data technology to reduce O&M cost of offshore wind Offshore wind is a relatively new industry and in general offshore wind is more expensive to generate than many alternative renewable sources. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) makes up a significant part of the overall cost of running offshore wind turbines. The complication of O&M lies in that its responsibility has been split between turbine manufacturers, wind farm operators and the offshore transmission owners.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Offshore Wind Industry - Key Trends and Statistics 2014
    The European offshore wind industry - key trends and statistics 2014 January 2015 A report by the European Wind Energy Association Contents Contents Executive summary 3 Annual market in 2014 4 Cumulative market 10 Market outlook for 2015 and 2016 14 Trends: turbines, water depth and distance to shore 16 Financing 19 Annual investment in offshore wind farms 24 If you have a query on the distribution or reproduction of this report, please contact Oliver Joy at EWEA at [email protected]. Contributors: Author and Statistical analysis: Giorgio Corbetta (European Wind Energy Association, EWEA) and Ariola Mbistrova (EWEA) Contributing author: Andrew Ho (EWEA) Contributing author: Jérôme Guillet (Green Giraffe Energy Bankers) Co-ordinating author: Iván Pineda (EWEA) Review: Justin Wilkes (EWEA) Cover: Siemens The European offshore wind industry - key trends and statistics 2014 2 Executive summary Executive summary Offshore wind power • 408 new offshore wind turbines in nine wind farms and one demonstration market in 2014 project, worth between €4.2 billion and €5.9 billion, were fully grid connected between 1 January and 31 December 2014. The new capacity totals 1,483.3 MW - 5.34% less than in 2013; • 536 turbines were erected during 2014, an average of 5.9 MW per day. 373 of these turbines are awaiting grid connection; • Work is on-going on 12 projects. Cumulative offshore wind • 2,488 turbines are now installed and grid connected, making a cumulative to- power market tal of 8,045.3 MW in 74 wind farms in 11 European countries; • 78.8% of substructures are monopiles, 10.4% are gravity foundations, jack- ets account for 4.7%, tripods account for 4.1%, and tripiles account for 1.9%; • There are also two full-scale grid-connected floating turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollandse Kust (Zuid) Wind Farm Zone Wind Farm Sites I & II
    Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind Farm Zone Wind Farm Sites I & II Project and Site Description October 2017 >> Sustainable. Agricultural. Innovative. International. Foreword 4 1 Objectives and reading guide 8 Contents 1.1 Objectives 9 1.2 Reading guide 9 2 Hollandse Kust (zuid) - The region and the opportunities 10 2.1 Regional overview 11 2.2 Wind power development in the Hollandse Kust region 11 2.3 Support and opportunities in the Hollandse Kust region 12 3 Hollandse Kust (zuid) - Site I and II - site description 14 3.1 General description of the Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind Farm Zone 15 3.2 Layout and coordinates of HKZWFS I and II 15 3.3 Existing infrastructure 16 3.4 TenneT offshore grid connection system 18 4 Site Studies 20 4.1 Archaeological desk study 22 4.2 Unexploded ordnance (UXO) risk assessment desk study 23 4.3 Geological desk study 25 4.4 Geophysical survey 25 4.5 Archaeological assessment of geophysical survey results 27 4.6 Geotechnical survey 28 4.7 Morphodynamical desk study 36 4.8 Technical note on scour and scour mitigation 38 4.9 Wind Resource Assessment 40 4.10 Metocean measurement campaign 42 4.11 Metocean desk study 44 4.12 Site Investigations quality and certification 47 5 Legal framework and specific requirements of the HKZWFS I and II permit tender 50 5.1 Introduction - Offshore wind road map 51 5.2 Legal framework 51 5.3 Permit tendering 52 5.4 TenneT offshore grid operator 53 6 Specific requirements and relevant information from the legal framework 58 6.1 Boundaries and coordinates 59 6.2 Design and operation requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Hollandse Kust (Zuid) Wind Farm Zone Wind Farm Sites I & II
    Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind Farm Zone Wind Farm Sites I & II Project and Site Description April 2017 >> Sustainable. Agricultural. Innovative. International. Foreword 4 1 Objectives and reading guide 8 Contents 1.1 Objectives 9 1.2 Reading guide 9 2 Hollandse Kust (zuid) - The region and the opportunities 10 2.1 Regional overview 11 2.2 Wind power development in the Hollandse Kust region 11 2.3 Support and opportunities in the Hollandse Kust region 12 3 Hollandse Kust (zuid) - Site I and II - site description 14 3.1 General description of the Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind Farm Zone 15 3.2 Layout and coordinates of HKZWFS I and II 15 3.3 Existing infrastructure 16 3.4 TenneT offshore grid connection system 18 4 Site Studies 20 4.1 Archaeological desk study 22 4.2 Unexploded ordnance (UXO) risk assessment desk study 23 4.3 Geological desk study 25 4.4 Geophysical survey 25 4.5 Archaeological assessment of geophysical survey results 27 4.6 Geotechnical survey 28 4.7 Morphodynamical desk study 36 4.8 Wind Resource Assessment 38 4.9 Metocean measurement campaign 41 4.10 Metocean desk study 42 4.11 Site Investigations quality and certification 45 5 Legal framework and specific requirements of the HKZWFS I and II SDE+ grant and permit tender 48 5.1 Introduction - Offshore wind road map 49 5.2 Legal framework 49 5.3 Stimulation of Sustainable Energy Production (SDE+) and permit tendering 50 5.4 TenneT offshore grid operator 51 6 Specific requirements and relevant information from the legal framework 56 6.1 Boundaries and coordinates 57 6.2 Design
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands
    April 2018 WWEA Policy Paper Series (PP-02-18-C) THE NETHERLANDS Denmark - Germany - The Netherlands - Spain - United Kingdom Author: Frits Ogg Table of Contents 1. The Netherlands; review of existing data and reports on public policies for wind farm development .......................................................................................................................................... 3 The historic process of development and introduction of the scheme ................................................ 3 The learning process .............................................................................................................................. 5 Prospects and predictions of wind power deployment ........................................................................ 7 Prospects onshore ................................................................................................................................. 7 Prospects offshore ................................................................................................................................. 7 2. Grid connection regulations in the Netherlands onshore and offshore ............................................... 9 3. Permission procedures, environmental impact assessments in the Netherlands ................................ 9 Onshore ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Offshore wind energy in the Netherlands ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurobserver-Wind-Ene
    1 2 302.7 TWh The estimated electricity production from wind power in the EU in 2016 wind energy barometer wind energy barometer WIND ENERGY BAROMETER A study carried out by EurObserv’ER. he global wind energy market appears to have encountered its initial limits. TSince the beginning of the millennium it has expanded almost continuously to achieve 64.4 GW in 2015. Preliminary estimates for 2016 point to sales of 54.2 GW, which is down on the previous year’s performance. Nonetheless, the results were good enough to give double digit growth of 12.4%, which took the global installed base up to 486.7 GW. The Ensemble Eolien Catalan, a 486,7 GW 12.1 GW 96 W wind farm in the Languedoc- Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées region. Worldwide installed wind power Wind power capacity installed EDF Énergies Nouvelles capacity at the end of 2016 in the EU during 2016 WIND ENERGY BAROMETER – EUROBSERV’ER – FEBRUARY 2017 WIND ENERGY BAROMETER – EUROBSERV’ER – FEBRUARY 2017 3 4 The Shimen Wind farm in Taïwan. constraints are affecting the Chinese compared to with 2015, it maintained its market in particular, which registered a leading South American market ranking Methodology note net downturn in 2016 (of 24.2% compared (at 2 014 MW), and remained in the world It should be pointed out that the to 2015), i.e. 23 328 MW (see below). top 5. sources used to create the indica- Although it had declined, the market tors of this theme-based barometer level for 2016 was still high enough (listed at the end of the survey) to give the global base double digit 486 679 MW across the may differ from those used in our growth (12.4%) which is now at 486.7 GW World publication: The state of renewable (graph 1).
    [Show full text]