The Question of Western Hungary / Burgenland 1918-1923
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JYVÄSKYLÄ STUDIES IN HUMANITIES 90 Mari Vares The Question of Western Hungary/Burgenland, 19181923 A Territorial Question in the Context of National and International Policy JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Copyright © , by University of Jyväskylä ABSTRACT Vares, Mari The Question of Western Hungary/Burgenland, 1918-1923. A Territorial Question in the Context of National and International Policy Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2008, 328 p. (Jyväskylä Studies on Humanities ISSN 1459-4331; 90) ISBN 978-951-39-3099-8 (PDF), 978-951-39-3074-5 (nid.) Finnish Summary Diss. The thesis discusses the decision-making of the new border between Austria and Hungary, the question of Western Hungary/Burgenland, 1918-1923. The purpose is to study the effect international relations and nation-state politics had on the question. The dispute did not only concern Austria and Hungary, but was part of the First World War peace process led by the Allies. This research explores the national and international decision-making level motives. It begins with the assumption that central political themes were channelled into the border question. The study focuses on the convergence of political ideas. The study shows how realism met idealism: how the ideals of nation, democracy, and ethnicity met the interests of power politics. The discussion foregrounds the way the arguments strengthened each other rather than operated separately. The aim has been to ponder the converging of national and international politics as accountable for the case of Western Hungary: how international politics affected this part of the peace settlement and, on the other hand, what was the role of national Austrian-Hungarian politics? To this border dispute between two losing sides of the war, the Allies could apply different methods than to politically more sensitive questions between the victors and the losers. In contradictory situations it was possible to act in accordance to the policy of concessions. Crises on the local and national level could be addressed by delegating some of the problem-solving authority to the national level. These methods could not, however, be allowed to evolve into a dangerous precedent for the opening up of other border questions. It was essential, then, for the Allies to emphasize the permanence of the peace treaties. Keywords: Austria, Hungary, territorial questions, borders, international relations Author’s address Mari Vares Department of History and Ethnology P.O. Box 35 (H) FIN-40014 University of Jyväskylä FINLAND [email protected] Supervisor Professor Seppo Zetterberg Department of History and Ethnology P.O. Box 35 (H) FIN-40014 University of Jyväskylä FINLAND Reviewers Professor Max Engman Åbo Akademi University Historieämnet vid Åbo Akademi Fabriksgatan 2 FIN-20500 Åbo FINLAND Professor Kalervo Hovi Department of History FIN-20014 University of Turku FINLAND Opponent Professor Kalervo Hovi Department of History FIN-20014 University of Turku FINLAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Long time ago, clichés of Habsburgian Central Europe inspired my interest towards Austrian and Hungarian history. Later I was happy for being able to combine my interests towards history and international relations with the history of Austria and Hungary, even though a post-Empress Elisabeth- one. I feel privileged to be able to carry out my studies and work in the academic field. Professor Jorma Ahvenainen and professor Jorma O. Tiainen encouraged me to pursue my studies further at the beginning of my doctoral studies. Over the years professor Seppo Zetterberg has patiently supervised my thesis. I am very grateful for his continuous support and encouragement. I would also like to thank docent Anssi Halmesvirta, who has shared his experiences in studying Hungarian history and professor Toivo Nygård for his support along the way. It is my pleasure to thank professor Arnold Suppan and professor Horst Haselsteiner from the University of Vienna, who guided me during the early phase of my studies in Vienna. In Budapest, professor Péter Sipos helped me to cope with the labyrinths of the archives. I would also thank professor Attila Pók and the Hungarian Academy of Science for the opportunity of studying in Budapest. I thank my reviewers professor Kalervo Hovi and professor Max Engman for offering their time to my manuscript and for their valuable advice. I also thank professor Hovi for accepting the duty of the opponent. The research work – either at home or in Paris or London – does not come without financial costs. I am most grateful for the financial support I have received from the University of Jyväskylä and its Faculty of Humanities and the Department of History and Ehnology, the Alfred Kordelin Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation and the Ellen and Artturi Nyyssönen Foundation. Centre for International Mobility (CIMO), Austrian Exchange Service (ÖAD) and Hungarian Ministry of Education helped me to realize my research plans in the Central European archives and libraries. I am also grateful for the opportunity to continue and develop my research on borders, nations and ‘Otherness’ as a member of the Academy of Finland project (2007-2009) led by professor Heino Nyyssönen. Hannu Tervaharju, Tina Parke-Sutherland and Sini Paronen deserve special thanks for their hard work with the English manuscript. Marjo Meriluoto-Jaakkola also spent evenings consulting my questions about the English language. The map of Western Hungarian borders is drawn by Mika Rissanen. Responsibility for the study rests with me, but without networks, circles of colleagues and friends the long way to the doctorate would have been much more difficult. I have had a long distance relationship with the Department of History and Ethnology of the University of Jyväskylä, but have also been able to enjoy the inspiring working environment and discussions with the colleagues and students. Networks can be established both at the home campus and far away from it. I would like to thank Emilia Palonen for sharing the Central – or Eastern – European experiences. To Susanna Niiranen I could say “we shall always have Paris”. Maari Kallberg, Monika Lüthje and Jukka Nyyssönen have witnessed my long term engagement with history and we have shared the experiences of secondary school class rooms as well as the experiences of doctoral studies. I thank Aija Lehtinen, Tuuli Kurkipää and Lotta Rinkinen for coffee breaks and rewarding discussions. I began my doctoral studies devoting myself almost solely to the problems of Western Hungary and Burgenland. I end up finishing my thesis as mom of two daughters, Vilma and Hanna, and also giving my time for other research and teaching tasks. I am grateful to my parents Kaija and Seppo Uotinen for their patience and support, especially as grandparents. Above all, my deepest thanks go to my husband Vesa Vares for sharing the interests to history and research work and moreover, for sharing everything else than work and history. Tampere, Tahmela, 8 December 2007 Mari Vares CONTENTS ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................11 1.1 Research topic and contextualization of border dispute ....................11 1.2 Conceptual and methodological framework........................................15 1.3 “Civitas Fidellissima” or “Du jüngstes Land”? Histories of Western Hungary and Burgenland ..................................24 1.4 Political and ideological framework for post-war international relations..............................................................................42 2 INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AS POST-WAR POLICY-MAKER AND STATE-BUILDER.....................................................................................48 2.1 Old and New Diplomacy: Conferences and Organizations...............48 2.2 New international order in terms of Wilsonism ..................................55 2.3 Building the French system of alliances ................................................60 2.4 Peace without conflicts – the British policy of compromise...............64 2.5 Italy – from margin to a decisive role ....................................................70 2.6 How to define the German post-Habsburg Austria? ..........................76 2.7 The politics of historical Hungary..........................................................83 3 AUSTRIA AS PART OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN ORDER 1918-1919 ......94 3.1 Raising the question: including German Western Hungary in the idea of German Austria.................................................................94 3.2 American investigations into Western Hungary .................................98 3.3 Could Austria be independent? British and French views on the viability and territoriality of Austria.............................................105 4 DEFINING THE NEW BORDER AT THE PEACE CONFERENCE 1919 .......................................................................................115 4.1 Opening the discussion in Paris – “Pourquoi changer l’ancienne frontière?” .......................................115 4.2 Austria defends its right to Western Hungary ..................................124 4.3 Re-opening the discussion with the Peace Conference ....................129 4.4 “La question qui se présente est assez simple” .................................133 4.5 Czechoslovakia’s importance reflects on the question of Western Hungary ..................................................................................136 4.6 The Supreme Council and the Central European