A Framework for Assessing Internet Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stakeholders' Involvement and Participation in the Internet Governance Ecosystem: an African Perspective
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Center for Global Communication Studies Internet Policy Observatory (CGCS) 12-2015 Stakeholders' Involvement and Participation in the Internet Governance Ecosystem: An African Perspective Enrico Calandro Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/internetpolicyobservatory Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons Recommended Citation Calandro, Enrico. (2015). Stakeholders' Involvement and Participation in the Internet Governance Ecosystem: An African Perspective. Internet Policy Observatory. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/internetpolicyobservatory/17 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/internetpolicyobservatory/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stakeholders' Involvement and Participation in the Internet Governance Ecosystem: An African Perspective Abstract From an African perspective, internet governance requires not only an understanding of the variability in access to and use of the internet across the continent, but also an understanding of the disparities between developed and developing countries’ abilities to effectively participate in global internet governance debates. Few developing countries participate in these debates, and even fewer are active in agenda-setting for global internet governance. This paper seeks to understand how these factors transect with the notion of multistakeholder participation as a form of governance for internet policymaking, which is often informed by assumptions from more mature markets and Western democracies. It does so by exploring the evolution of multistakeholder participation through mapping the main international and regional instruments of the internet governance ecosystem in Africa. It critically assesses the ability of current multistakeholder initiatives to provide Africans with a compass to guide them through the miasma of cybercrime, political surveillance, censorship and profiteering that threaten the openness of the internet. -
Mapping Stakeholderism in Internet Governance Project
Policy and Regulation Initiative for Digital Africa (PRIDA) Mapping Stakeholderism in Internet Governance Project (Project Output A5.4, A5.5, A5.7) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Internet Governance ............................................................................................................. 3 What is Internet Governance? ........................................................................................... 3 The evolution of Internet governance ................................................................................. 3 Figure 1: Timeline for the establishment and growth of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 5 The core guiding principles of Internet Governance ........................................................... 5 Multistakeholderism - Internet governance actors .............................................................. 5 Governments ................................................................................................................. 6 The private sector .......................................................................................................... 8 Civil Society ................................................................................................................... 8 International organisations ............................................................................................. 8 Technical community .................................................................................................... -
Mapping Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance-FINAL
Evidence for ICT Policy Action Discussion Paper Mapping Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance: Implications for Africa Enrico Calandro, Alison Gillwald & Nicolo Zingales Research ICT Africa Research ICT Africa (RIA) is a non-profit public research network concerned with information and communication technology (ICT) development policy and governance. It is based in Cape Town, South Africa and is under the direction of Dr Alison Gillwald. It aims to bridge the strategic gap in the development of a sustainable information society and a knowledge-based economy by conducting research on the policies and governance of the necessary ICT to document efficient governance in Africa. Initially financed by the International Development and Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, Canada, the network tries to extend its activities through national, regional and continental partnerships. The creation of the Research ICT Africa network meets the growing need for data and analysis necessary for an appropriate but visionary policy in order to propel the continent into the information age. Through the development of a network, RIA seeks to build an African knowledge base capable of supporting the ICT policy and regulation processes, and to ensure that the development of these processes is monitored on the continent. The research comes from a public interest agenda in the public domain, and individuals, public and private sector entities and civil society are also encouraged to use it for training and future research or to make the most of it in order to enable them to participate more efficiently in the formulation of ICT policy and governance on national, regional and global levels. This research is made possible thanks to significant funds received from the IDRC, to which the members of the network express their gratitude for its support. -
Internet Universality Indicators: Online Consultation Phase II March 15, 2018
Comments of the ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION Internet Universality Indicators: Online Consultation Phase II March 15, 2018 The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) submits the following comments to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (“UNESCO”), pursuant to the request for public comment on “Developing UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators: Help UNESCO Assess and Improve the Internet.”1 EPIC was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues. 2 Since that time, EPIC has worked on a range of international policy issues concerning the future of the Internet. EPIC established the Public Voice project in 1996 to enable civil society participation in decisions concerning the future of the Internet.3 EPIC also helped establish the .ORG domain and the International Domain Name system to facilitate broad use of the Internet by people of all linguistic and cultural backgrounds.4 EPIC has worked with UNESCO for more than twenty years.5 In 2015, at a presentation at UNESCO’s headquarters in Paris, EPIC stated that algorithmic transparency should be regarded as a fundamental human right.6 In 2017 in Hong Kong, EPIC participated in UNESCO’s first consultation on Internet Universality indicators.7 EPIC also maintains a webpage on Internet Universality.8 1 PHASE 2 CONSULTATION ON UNESCO’S INTERNET UNIVERSALITY INDICATORS, https://en.unesco.org/internetuniversality 2 See, About EPIC, EPIC, https://epic.org/epic/about.html. 3 See, About the Public Voice, The Public Voice, http://thepublicvoice.org/about-us/ 4 ISOC, Minutes of the 30th Board Meeting (Nov 16-17, 2002) (“We will together start a new non-commercial Internet.”) (Remarks of Marc Rotenberg), https://www.internetsociety.org/board-of-trustees/minutes/30 5 UNESCO, Report of the Experts Meeting on Cyberspace Law (Feb. -
Le Directeur Général
SUMMARY REPORT OF AROUND 200 RESPONSES RECEIVED TO THE ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE CONSULTATION Following UNESCO’s launch of a global questionnaire during July-December 2014 to collect inputs and research from a range of stakeholders on internet study, around 200 responses and submissions were received which provide diverse and substantial inputs in the areas of access to information and knowledge, freedom of expression, privacy, and ethical dimensions of the information society as well as options for future actions. The questionnaire consultation consists of two components: a global consultation through UNESCO website and a regional pilot one in the Latin America through a portal website of Observacom as ensured by UNESCO Advisor for Communication and Information in Montevideo Office. UNESCO website includes 94 responses and submissions submitted by all stakeholders: Governments (14): Burundi (2), Kenya (3), Lebanon, Oman, Sierra Leone, Mexico, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria, Freedom Online Coalition countries, and Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden); International Organizations (5): Council of Europe (CoE); Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); International Telecommunication Union (ITU); International Federation of Library Association and Institutions (IFLA); European Broadcasting Union(EBU); Civil Society and NGOs including individual users (41): Association for Progressive (APC); AccessNow.org; Just Net Coalition (JNC); Article19; European Digital Rights (EURi); DotConnectAfrica; Independent -
Internet Universality Indicators UNESCO, 27/08/2019
Internet Assessment Framework – Internet Universality Indicators UNESCO, 27/08/2019 Développer une IA pour des societies de savoir: UNESCO Internet Universality Indicators 2019 UNESCO Indicateurs de L’UNESCO sur l’Universalité d’Internet World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development (2017-2018) : Asia-Pacific Regional Overview: • Cases of online defamation are on the rise; judicial practices regarding civil law violations have created new limitations on press freedom; • Increases in the shutting down of access to mobile, internet applications and services by states; • Data sovereignty and efforts by governments to restrict the transfer, or exert more control over, cross-border data transfers; • The use of social media platforms’ and messaging apps to spread disinformation, propaganda and to justify prevalent narratives. In Asia, fake news is spread mainly for political rather than economic or anti-scientific reasons. UNESCO Internet Universality Indicators 2019 UNESCO Indicateurs de L’UNESCO sur l’Universalité d’Internet World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development (2017-2018) : Asia-Pacific Regional Overview: • An increased availability of digital platforms for expression and user-generated content, while the digital switchover has expanded plurality of television and radio channels; • A rise of polarized pluralism, diversity of information and programming, and a fragmentation of audiences. Countries that report increased polarization and sectarianism also report media capture and polarization in both traditional -
The Working Group on Internet Governance
The Working Group on Internet Governance 10th anniversary reflections Edited by William J. Drake The Working Group on Internet Governance 10th anniversary reflections Edited by William J. Drake The Working Group on Internet Governance 10th anniversary reflections Editor William J. Drake Publication production Roxana Bassi (APC) Editorial support Lori Nordstrom (APC) Proofreading Valerie Dee Graphic design Monocromo [email protected] Phone: +598 2400 1685 Financial support provided by The Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) The Association for Progressive Communications (APC) The Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (CGI.br) The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) The Internet Society (ISOC) Published by APC 2016 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Some rights reserved. The Working Group on Internet Governance: 10th anniversary reflections ISBN 978-92-95102-50-7 APC-201601-CIPP-R-EN-DIGITAL-241 Acknowledgements For their financial support of this project, I would like to thank the the Asia-Pacific Net- work Information Centre (APNIC), the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (CGI.br), the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), and the Internet Society (ISOC). At APC, Roxana Bassi managed the production process and Lori Nordstrom managed the copy editing. Many thanks to them both for their hard work and patience. William J. Drake C ontents PREFACE ........................................................................................................7 -
In the Matter of an Independent Review Process Before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution
IN THE MATTER OF AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ICDR Case No. 50 117 T 1083 13 DotConnectAfrica Trust, ) ) Claimant, ) ) v. ) ) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, ) ) Respondent. ) AMENDED NOTICE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS Weil, Gotshal, Manges, LLP 1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: +1 202 682 7000 Fax: +1 202 857 0940 Counsel for Claimant I. INTRODUCTION 1. DotConnectAfrica Trust (“DCA”) hereby submits its Amended Notice of Independent Review Process (“Amended Notice”) concerning a dispute with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) pursuant to Article 4, Section 3 of ICANN’s Bylaws, the International Arbitration Rules of the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (“ICDR”), and the ICDR Supplementary Procedures for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Independent Review Process.1 2. The dispute, as detailed below, arises out of (1) ICANN’s breaches of its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, international and local law, and other applicable rules in the administration of applications for the .AFRICA top-level domain name in its 2012 General Top- Level Domains (“gTLD”) Internet Expansion Program (the “New gTLD Program”); and (2) ICANN’s wrongful decision that DCA’s application for .AFRICA should not proceed. ICANN’s administration of the New gTLD Program and its decision on DCA’s application were unfair, discriminatory, and lacked appropriate due diligence and care, in breach of ICANN’s Articles of 1 DCA provides this Amended Notice without prejudice to its right to supplement or amend its claims during the IRP proceeding and its right to further elaborate upon and substantiate the factual and legal positions set forth herein. -
Standards for a Free, Open, and Inclusive Internet
OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/RELE/INF.17/17 March 15, 2017 Original: Spanish Standards for a Free, Open and Inclusive Internet Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Edison Lanza Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression. Standards for a free, open, and inclusive Internet. v. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978-0-8270-6637-3 1. Freedom of expression--America. 2. Freedom of information--America. 3. Internet--America. I. Lanza, Edison. II. Title. III. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/RELE/INF.17/17 Document prepared and printed thanks to the financial support of Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, and the governments of Costa Rica, Chile, France, Finland, Switzerland, Peru, United States and Uruguay. INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Margarette May Macaulay Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez Paulo Vannuchi James L. Cavallaro Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Assistant Executive Secretary Elizabeth Abi-Mershed This book corresponds to chapter III of the 2016 Annual Report of the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression approved on March 15, 2017 by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. INDEX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER -
United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech
United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech Detailed Guidance on Implementation for United Nations Field Presences SEPTEMBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ........................... 3 SUMMARY ................................................. 5 I. INTRODUCTION: A COMMON APPROACH .......................... 7 II. UNDERSTANDING HATE SPEECH................................10 A. What is “hate speech” under the Strategy? ..........................10 B. What types of speech are covered by the Strategy? ..................... 12 C. How should the severity of hate speech be assessed? .................... 17 D. How is the Strategy relevant to United Nations field presences? .............. 19 III. IMPLEMENTATIONOFTHESTRATEGY’STHIRTEENCOMMITMENTS .......23 IV. ACTIONPOINTSANDSPECIFICRECOMMENDATIONSFOR IMPLEMENTING THE THIRTEEN COMMITMENTS OF THE STRATEGY ......25 COMMITMENT 1: Monitoring and analysing hate speech ...................25 COMMITMENT 2: Addressing root causes, drivers and actors of hate speech .......28 COMMITMENT 3: Engaging and supporting the victims of hate speech ..........30 COMMITMENT 4: Convening relevant actors ..........................32 COMMITMENT 5: Engaging with new and traditional media .................33 COMMITMENT 6: Using technology ...............................38 COMMITMENT 7: Using education as a tool for addressing and countering hate speech ..40 COMMITMENT 8: Fostering peaceful, inclusive and just societies to address the root causes and drivers of hate speech .............................42 -
Freedom of Expression and the Internet
Freedom of expression and the internet ‘The same rights that people have offline must also be protected online’ - UNHCR Resolution, 2012 Andrew Puddephatt, March 2014 1 Table of contents 1. The internet and the means of communication 2 2. After the printing press 4 3. Where did the internet come from? 5 4. How the internet is changing freedom of expression 7 5. Changes and challenges 9 6. New tools for freedom 12 7. Facing the challenge 13 The jurisdictional challenge 13 The policy challenge 14 8. Governance online 16 Shaping public policy online - global 17 Shaping public policy online – national 17 9. Policy recommendations 20 Infrastructure 20 The applications layer 22 The content layer 24 The socio- political layer 27 Addressing inequalities 29 10. Conclusion 31 2 1. The internet and the means of communication The internet has changed the way people communicate dramatically. Thousands of years ago, early humans painted hunting scenes on cave walls, leaving messages that communicate to us even today, though the meaning has been lost. For most of human history communication was limited and local, based as much upon rumour and personal anecdote as anything more authoritative. The decisive stage in the promotion of freedom of expression came with Johannes Gutenberg and the invention of the printing press. This enabled the mass production of information and opinions and their circulation on a scale previously unimaginable. It is still hard to assess, in retrospect, the impact of the printing press – we cannot imagine a world without print - but arguably, in Europe, the Reformation and the Renaissance were outcomes – as was the Thirty Years War (demonstrating that all innovation has a dark as well as light side). -
Principles for Governing the Internet – a Comparative Analysis United Nations Cultural Organization Educational, Scientific and Internet
Principles for governing the Internet A comparative analysis UNESCO Publishing This research reviews more than 50 Internet-specific United Nations Educational, Scientific and declarations and frameworks relevant to Internet Cultural Organization principles. These documents provided important context for UNESCO’s comprehensive Internet Study, titled Keystones for the Internet. However, it was also clear that there a need for a specific review of the declarations and frameworks from the perspective of UNESCO’s mandate. Principles for governing the Internet – A comparative analysis This publication fulfils this role and it shows that while each of these other documents has its own Principles for governing value, none of them fully meets UNESCO’s interests and mandate. It is proposed therefore that UNESCO the Internet adopt the concept of “Internet Universality” as the Organisation’s own clear identifier for approaching the various fields of Internet issues and their intersections A comparative analysis with UNESCO concerns. Internet Universality highlights the contribution that can be made by an Internet that is based on four principles, recognised by UNESCO governing bodies. An Internet developed on these principles would be: human Rights-based; Open; Accessible to all; and governed through Multi-stakeholder participation (summarized in the acronym R.O.A.M.). This concept has relevance to the Organization’s work in many areas – including online freedom of expression and privacy; efforts to advance universality in education, social inclusion