DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for a Free, Open, and Inclusive Internet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/RELE/INF.17/17 March 15, 2017 Original: Spanish Standards for a Free, Open and Inclusive Internet Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Edison Lanza Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression. Standards for a free, open, and inclusive Internet. v. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978-0-8270-6637-3 1. Freedom of expression--America. 2. Freedom of information--America. 3. Internet--America. I. Lanza, Edison. II. Title. III. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/RELE/INF.17/17 Document prepared and printed thanks to the financial support of Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, and the governments of Costa Rica, Chile, France, Finland, Switzerland, Peru, United States and Uruguay. INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Margarette May Macaulay Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez Paulo Vannuchi James L. Cavallaro Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Assistant Executive Secretary Elizabeth Abi-Mershed This book corresponds to chapter III of the 2016 Annual Report of the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression approved on March 15, 2017 by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. INDEX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER I: GUIDING PRINCIPLES ....................................................................... 13 A. Free and Open Internet.................................................................................................................................... 16 B. Access ...................................................................................................................................................................... 20 C. Multi-stakeholder Governance ..................................................................................................................... 25 D. Equality and Nondiscrimination ................................................................................................................. 27 CHAPTER II: THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION ......................................................................................................................................... 33 A. The Right to Freedom of Thought and Expression in the Inter-American System ............... 33 B. Internet and Freedom of Expression ......................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER III : RIGHT TO ACCESS TO INFORMATION .................................... 65 A. International Standards on the Right to Access to Information .................................................... 65 B. The Internet and the Right to Access to Information ......................................................................... 68 CHAPTER IV: FIGHT TO PRIVACY AND PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA.............................................................................................................................. 73 A. International Standards on Privacy and Data Protection ............................................................... 74 B. The Internet and Protection of Privacy .................................................................................................... 77 INTRODUCTION Introduction | 9 INTRODUCTION 1. The Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the IACHR has acknowledged that the Internet is a unique instrument with which to extend the enormous potential of human rights and, in particular, the right to freedom of expression, to broad sectors of the public.1 2. The growing expansion of the web throughout the world, and especially in the Americas, makes it an indispensable instrument for the full exercise of human rights and contributes to the achievement of increasing levels of social benefits and inclusion.2 In order for the benefits of the Internet and other communications technology to be distributed inclusively and sustainably among the population, the relevant policies and practices must be based on respecting and guaranteeing human rights—especially the right to freedom of expression, which facilitates and enables the exercise of other rights on the Internet. In the words of the United Nations General Assembly, “progress towards the vision of the World Summit on the Information Society should be considered not only as a function of economic development and the spreading of information and communications technologies but also as a function of progress with respect to the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms.”3 3. In its report on Freedom of Expression and the Internet (2013), the Office of the Special Rapporteur noted that the Internet’s unprecedented potential for the right to freedom of expression is mainly due to its “multidirectional and interactive nature, its speed, and its global scope at a relatively low cost, as well as its decentralized and open design.”4 The Office of the Special Rapporteur also affirmed that “the Internet also 1 IACHR. Annual Report 2013. Annual Report 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression 2013 Chapter IV (Freedom of Expression and the Internet). OEA/Ser.L/V/II.149. Doc. 50. 31 December2013. 2 United Nations. Human Rights Council. Resolution about the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet. UN Doc. A/HRC/32/L.20. 1 July 2016. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session32/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/ EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session32/Documents/A.HRC.32.2_AUV.doc&action=default&DefaultItemOp en=1; United Nations. General Assembly. Resolution 70/125. Outcome document of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society. UN Doc. A/RES/70/125. 1 February 2016. Para. 9. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/125. 3 United Nations. General Assembly. Resolution 70/125. Outcome document of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society. UN Doc. A/RES/70/125. 1 February 2016. Para. 9. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/125. 4 IACHR. Annual Report 2013. Annual Report 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression 2013 Chapter IV (Freedom of Expression and the Internet). OEA/Ser.L/V/II.149. Doc. 50. 31 December 2013. Para. 36. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights | IACHR 10 | Standards for a Free, Open, and Inclusive Internet serves as a platform for fulfilling other human rights, such as the right to participate in cultural life and enjoy the benefits of scientific and technological progress (article 14 of the Protocol of San Salvador), the right to education (article 13 of the Protocol of San Salvador), the right to assembly and association (articles 15 and 16 of the American Convention), political rights (article 23 of the American Convention), and the right to health (article 10 of the Protocol of San Salvador), among other rights.”5 4. The Office of the Special Rapporteur has underscored that the right to freedom of expression, in particular, is fully applicable to communications, ideas, and information that is disseminated and accessed through the Internet.6 Along the same lines, the UN Human Rights Council reaffirmed that “the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online.”7 5. This report draws from the standards developed on the 2013 Report on Freedom of Expression and the Internet, broadening its analysis to the new challenges faced in the exercise of human rights online, particularly freedom of expression. The document reviews current principles and summarizes the Inter-American case law and the advances made throughout the world, with the understanding that the right to freedom of expression is instrumental to the exercise of human rights on the Internet. Because of this, the standards on this subject shed light on the analysis of other, interrelated rights. The aim of this report is to assist the member States in their efforts to incorporate a human rights-based focus in the design, development, and implementation of policies affecting the Internet. 5 IACHR. Annual Report 2013. Annual Report 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression 2013 Chapter IV (Freedom of Expression and the Internet). OEA/Ser.L/V/II.149. Doc. 50. 31 December 2013. Para. 36. 6 IACHR. Annual Report 2013. Annual Report 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression 2013 Chapter IV (Freedom of Expression and the Internet). OEA/Ser.L/V/II.149. Doc. 50. 31 December 2013. Para. 2. 7 United Nations. Human Rights Council. Resolution about the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet. UN Doc. A/HRC/32/L.20. 1 July 2016. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session32/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/ EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session32/Documents/A.HRC.32.2_AUV.doc&action=default&DefaultItemOp en=1 Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression | RFOE CHAPTER I GUIDING PRINCIPLES Chapter 1 Guiding Principles | 13
Recommended publications
  • Citation Analysis for the Modern Instructor: an Integrated Review of Emerging Research

    Citation Analysis for the Modern Instructor: an Integrated Review of Emerging Research

    CITATION ANALYSIS FOR THE MODERN INSTRUCTOR: AN INTEGRATED REVIEW OF EMERGING RESEARCH Chris Piotrowski University of West Florida USA Abstract While online instructors may be versed in conducting e-Research (Hung, 2012; Thelwall, 2009), today’s faculty are probably less familiarized with the rapidly advancing fields of bibliometrics and informetrics. One key feature of research in these areas is Citation Analysis, a rather intricate operational feature available in modern indexes such as Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. This paper reviews the recent extant research on bibliometrics within the context of citation analysis. Particular focus is on empirical studies, review essays, and critical commentaries on citation-based metrics across interdisciplinary academic areas. Research that relates to the interface between citation analysis and applications in higher education is discussed. Some of the attributes and limitations of citation operations of contemporary databases that offer citation searching or cited reference data are presented. This review concludes that: a) citation-based results can vary largely and contingent on academic discipline or specialty area, b) databases, that offer citation options, rely on idiosyncratic methods, coverage, and transparency of functions, c) despite initial concerns, research from open access journals is being cited in traditional periodicals, and d) the field of bibliometrics is rather perplex with regard to functionality and research is advancing at an exponential pace. Based on these findings, online instructors would be well served to stay abreast of developments in the field. Keywords: Bibliometrics, informetrics, citation analysis, information technology, Open resource and electronic journals INTRODUCTION In an ever increasing manner, the educational field is irreparably linked to advances in information technology (Plomp, 2013).
  • Understanding the Right to Freedom of Expression

    Understanding the Right to Freedom of Expression

    Understanding the Right to Freedom of Expression AN INTERNATIONAL LAW PRIMER FOR JOURNALISTS This is a joint publication by the International Human Rights Program (IHRP) at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law and Journalists for Human Rights (JHR). The IHRP is a multiple-award winning program that enhances the legal protection of existing and emerging international human rights obligations through advocacy, knowledge-exchange, and capacity-building initiatives that provide experiential learning opportunities for students and legal expertise to civil society. Journalists for Human Rights (JHR) is Canada’s leading media development organization. JHR helps journalists build their capacity to report ethically and effectively on human rights and governance issues in their communities. AUTHOR: Katie Bresner EDITORS: Renu Mandhane, Bonnie Allen (pro-bono), Naregh Galoustian FACT-CHECKING: Arezou Soltani (pro-bono) DESIGN: Meghan D’Mello (pro-bono) COVER PHOTO: Journalism students Ibrahim Sahoury and Ahmed Habeeballah participate in a JHR workshop in February 2014 in Amman, Jordan. © Rachel Pulfer 2014 International Human Rights Program (IHRP) University of Toronto Faculty of Law 39 Queen’s Park, Suite 106 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 2C3 http://ihrp.law.utoronto.ca Journalist for Human Rights (JHR) 147 Spadina Avenue, Suite 206 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5V 2L7 http://www.jhr.ca/en/ This publication was generously supported by the United Nations Democracy Fund Copyright © 2015 IHRP | JHR All rights reserved. Printed in Toronto. iii Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. DEFINING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 3 III. PROTECTING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: UNITED NATIONS TREATIES 7 A. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 8 B.
  • Background Note on Human Rights Violations Against Intersex People Table of Contents 1 Introduction

    Background Note on Human Rights Violations Against Intersex People Table of Contents 1 Introduction

    Background Note on Human Rights Violations against Intersex People Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 2 Understanding intersex ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Situating the rights of intersex people......................................................................... 4 2.2 Promoting the rights of intersex people....................................................................... 7 3 Forced and coercive medical interventions......................................................................... 8 4 Violence and infanticide ............................................................................................... 20 5 Stigma and discrimination in healthcare .......................................................................... 22 6 Legal recognition, including registration at birth ............................................................... 26 7 Discrimination and stigmatization .................................................................................. 29 8 Access to justice and remedies ....................................................................................... 32 9 Addressing root causes of human rights violations ............................................................ 35 10 Conclusions and way forward..................................................................................... 37 10.1 Conclusions
  • When Human Claims Become Rights. the Case of the Right to Truth Over “Desaparecidos”

    When Human Claims Become Rights. the Case of the Right to Truth Over “Desaparecidos”

    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 7, n. 6 (2017) – Investigations – Investigaciones – Ikerlanak ISSN: 2079-5971 When Human Claims Become Rights. The Case of the Right to Truth over “Desaparecidos” ARIANNA JACQMIN∗ Jacqmin, A., 2017. When Human Claims Become Rights. The Case of the Right to Truth over “Desaparecidos”. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 7 (6), 1247-1272. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3051031 Abstract This article deals with the birth of the Right to Truth for the families of missing persons. It refers to socio-legal theories about the origins of human rights that deconstruct their moral and philosophical dimension, and place them in the social milieu in which they arise and develop. This theoretical framework helps analyzing the transitional context of Argentina after the dictatorship, where lawyers promoted the Right to Truth, as the best alternative to a missing criminal justice. Through the analysis of legal memories, the article shows how lawyers and activists, by using the seductive human rights rhetoric, were able to attribute legal qualification to a moral aspiration, as they transformed the desire of the victims to know the destiny of all desaparecidos into a new and autonomous right. Key words Right to Truth; Juicios por la Verdad; desaparecidos; human rights; transitional justice; Argentina Resumen Este artículo se centra en el nacimiento del Derecho a la Verdad para las familias de personas desaparecidas. Se refiere a las teorías sociojurídicas sobre los orígenes de los derechos humanos las cuales desconstruyen su dimensión moral y filosófica y los ubican en el contexto social en el cual surgen y se desarrollan.
  • Internet Universality Indicators: Online Consultation Phase II March 15, 2018

    Internet Universality Indicators: Online Consultation Phase II March 15, 2018

    Comments of the ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION Internet Universality Indicators: Online Consultation Phase II March 15, 2018 The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) submits the following comments to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (“UNESCO”), pursuant to the request for public comment on “Developing UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators: Help UNESCO Assess and Improve the Internet.”1 EPIC was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues. 2 Since that time, EPIC has worked on a range of international policy issues concerning the future of the Internet. EPIC established the Public Voice project in 1996 to enable civil society participation in decisions concerning the future of the Internet.3 EPIC also helped establish the .ORG domain and the International Domain Name system to facilitate broad use of the Internet by people of all linguistic and cultural backgrounds.4 EPIC has worked with UNESCO for more than twenty years.5 In 2015, at a presentation at UNESCO’s headquarters in Paris, EPIC stated that algorithmic transparency should be regarded as a fundamental human right.6 In 2017 in Hong Kong, EPIC participated in UNESCO’s first consultation on Internet Universality indicators.7 EPIC also maintains a webpage on Internet Universality.8 1 PHASE 2 CONSULTATION ON UNESCO’S INTERNET UNIVERSALITY INDICATORS, https://en.unesco.org/internetuniversality 2 See, About EPIC, EPIC, https://epic.org/epic/about.html. 3 See, About the Public Voice, The Public Voice, http://thepublicvoice.org/about-us/ 4 ISOC, Minutes of the 30th Board Meeting (Nov 16-17, 2002) (“We will together start a new non-commercial Internet.”) (Remarks of Marc Rotenberg), https://www.internetsociety.org/board-of-trustees/minutes/30 5 UNESCO, Report of the Experts Meeting on Cyberspace Law (Feb.
  • GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Shifting Modes, Persisting Paradigms

    GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Shifting Modes, Persisting Paradigms

    ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE RESEARCH GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Shifting Modes, Persisting Paradigms edited by Pranesh Prakash Nagla Rizk Carlos Affonso Souza GLOBAL CENSORSHIP Shifting Modes, Persisting Paradigms edited by Pranesh Pra ash Nag!a Ri" Car!os Affonso So$"a ACCESS %O KNO'LE(GE RESEARCH SERIES COPYRIGHT PAGE © 2015 Information Society Project, Yale Law School; Access to Knowle !e for "e#elo$ment %entre, American Uni#ersity, %airo; an Instituto de Technolo!ia & Socie a e do Rio+ (his wor, is $'-lishe s'-ject to a %reati#e %ommons Attri-'tion./on%ommercial 0%%.1Y./%2 3+0 In. ternational P'-lic Licence+ %o$yri!ht in each cha$ter of this -oo, -elon!s to its res$ecti#e a'thor0s2+ Yo' are enco'ra!e to re$ro 'ce, share, an a a$t this wor,, in whole or in part, incl' in! in the form of creat . in! translations, as lon! as yo' attri-'te the wor, an the a$$ro$riate a'thor0s2, or, if for the whole -oo,, the e itors+ Te4t of the licence is a#aila-le at <https677creati#ecommons+or!7licenses7-y.nc73+07le!alco e8+ 9or $ermission to $'-lish commercial #ersions of s'ch cha$ter on a stan .alone -asis, $lease contact the a'thor, or the Information Society Project at Yale Law School for assistance in contactin! the a'thor+ 9ront co#er ima!e6 :"oc'ments sei;e from the U+S+ <m-assy in (ehran=, a $'-lic omain wor, create by em$loyees of the Central Intelli!ence A!ency / em-assy of the &nite States of America in Tehran, de$ict.
  • Setting International Standards for ICT Indicators

    Setting International Standards for ICT Indicators

    Paris, 29-30 March 2010 Setting International Standards for ICT Indicators An Overview of the OECD Working Party on Indicators for the Information Society (WPIIS) Vincenzo Spiezia [email protected] Head, ICT Indicators Unit Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD 1 Developing standards, methodology and indicators …. 1998: OECD Ministerial Conference on E-Commerce in Ottawa. 2008: Ministerial Conference on The Future of the Internet Society in Seoul. The Ministerial called for the OECD to develop international standards for the measurement of the Information Society. The mandate of the Working Party on Indicators for the Information Society (WPIIS) : “to establish a set of definitions and methodologies to facilitate the compilation of internationally comparable data for measuring various aspects of the information society, the information economy and e-commerce”. Paris, 29-30 March 2010 2 The main contributions of WPIIS 1. A general approach to information society indicators 2. Standards for industry related statistics 1. The ICT sector definition (ISIC 3.1 ISIC4) 2. The media and content sector definition (CPC 2) 3. Standards for product related statistics 1. ICT goods (HS CPC2) 2. ICT services (CPC2) 4. Definitions of e-commerce 5. Model surveys 1. ICT use by households and individuals 2. ICT use by businesses 6. The Guide to Measuring the Information Society Paris, 29-30 March 2010 3 A general framework to organize indicators ICT ICT infrastructure ICT supply demand industries who characteristics where
  • Establishing the Human Perspective of the Information Society

    Establishing the Human Perspective of the Information Society

    Establishing the human perspective of the information society Helen Partridge BA (UQ), GradDipPsych (UQ), MIT (QUT) Submitted in fulfilment of QUT Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information Technology Queensland University of Technology 2007 Supervisory Panel Principal Supervisor Associate Professor Sylvia Edwards Faculty of Information Technology, QUT Associate Supervisors Professor Christine Bruce Faculty of Information Technology, QUT Associate Professor Gillian Hallam Faculty of Information Technology, QUT Dr Paul Baxter Department of Employment and Training Queensland State Government ii Abstract The digital divide is a core issue of the information society. It refers to the division between those who have access to, or are comfortable using, information and communication technology (ICT) (the “haves”) and those who do not have access to, or are not comfortable using ICT (the “have-nots”). The digital divide is a complex phenomenon. The majority of studies to date have examined the digital divide from a socio-economic perspective. These studies have identified income, education and employment as the key factors in determining the division between the “haves” and the “have-nots”. Very little research has explore the psychological, social or cultural factors that contribute to digital inequality in community. The current study filled this gap by using Bandura’s social cognitive theory (SCT) to examine the psychological barriers that prevent individuals from integrating ICT into their everyday lives. SCT postulates that a person will act according to their perceived capabilities and the anticipated consequences of their actions. Four studies have explored the digital divide using SCT. Because of limitations in the research design these studies have shed only limited light onto current understanding of digital inequality in community.
  • Knowledge Democracy and the Implications to Information Access

    Knowledge Democracy and the Implications to Information Access

    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1750-497X.htm Knowledge Knowledge democracy and the democracy implications to information access Ahmad Raza and Hasan Sohaib Murad School of Business and Economics, University of Management and Technology, 37 Lahore, Pakistan Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the concept of “knowledge democracy,” deploying a pluralistic, and cross disciplinary and humanistic critique. Design/methodology/approach – This is a culturally pluralistic and humanistic interpretation of globally emergent form of learning pedagogy, particularly manifested in e-learning. Findings – This paper explores the concept of knowledge democracy in the context of knowledge and information revolution. It has been argued that knowledge democratization implies freedom and equality to access information and knowledge across cultures and societies, particularly in the context of globalization. It is asserted that a democratization of the notion of knowledge would cause a paradigm shift; the way instruction and education are socially structured in different social systems. The knowledge society provides a new spirit of global sharing of values, acceptance of others and learning to live with divergent worldviews. It is contended that e-learning in particular sets a new global social opportunity to transcend regional, racial and national prejudices. Originality/value – The paper underscores the significance of pluralistic and humanistic perspective on knowledge and e-learning. Keywords Globalization, Epistemology, E-learning, Knowledge management, Information and communication technologies Paper type Conceptual paper Social forms of knowledge Historically, knowledge has been the defining attribute of human species. From the simple hunters of pre-historic times to medieval peasants to modern day information creators; all have sought to understand more deeply the structure of physical and social world.
  • Economic and Social Council

    Economic and Social Council

    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2006/91 8 February 2006 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty-second session Item 17 of the provisional agenda PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Study on the right to the truth Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights GE.06-10656 (E) 140206 E/CN.4/2006/91 page 2 Summary This report is submitted pursuant to Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/66. A note verbale was sent on 14 July 2005 to all States and relevant intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, requesting information on the right to the truth. A number of States provided statements to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and their views have been reflected in this study. The study also benefited from the expert workshop on the right to the truth organized by OHCHR in October 2005. The study concludes that the right to the truth about gross human rights violations and serious violations of human rights law is an inalienable and autonomous right, linked to the duty and obligation of the State to protect and guarantee human rights, to conduct effective investigations and to guarantee effective remedy and reparations. This right is closely linked with other rights and has both an individual and a societal dimension and should be considered as a non-derogable right and not be subject to limitations. E/CN.4/2006/91 page 3 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 - 3 4 I. LEGAL AND HISTORICAL BASIS FOR THE RIGHT TO THE TRUTH ........................................................
  • Communicating in the Information Society

    Communicating in the Information Society

    communicatingcommunicating inin thethe ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ informationinformation societysociety edited by Bruce Girard and Seán Ó Siochrú ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ UNRISD UNITED NATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Communicating in the Information Society edited by Bruce Girard and Seán Ó Siochrú UNRISD UNITED NATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT This United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) book has been prepared with the support of UNRISD core funds. UNRISD thanks the governments of Denmark, Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom for this funding. Copyright © UNRISD. Short extracts from this publication may be reproduced unaltered without authorization on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNRISD welcomes such applications. The designations employed in UNRISD publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNRISD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the author(s), and publication does not constitute endorsement by UNRISD. UNRISD publications are available from the Reference Centre, UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland; phone +41 (0)22 9173020; fax +41 (0)22 9170650; [email protected]; www.unrisd.org. ISBN 92-9085-045-0 Contents Authors iii Foreword vii Acronyms ix Introduction Seán Ó Siochrú and Bruce Girard 1 What About Gender Issues in the Information Society? Dafne Sabanes Plou 11 A Community Informatics for the Information Society William McIver, Jr.
  • International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict

    International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict

    I INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMED CONFLICT New York and Geneva, 2011 II INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMED CONFLICT NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a figure indicates a reference to a United Nations document. HR/PUB/11/01 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION SALES No. E.11.XIV.3 ISBN-13: 978-92-1-154191-5 eISBN-13: 978-92-1-055097-0 © 2011 UNITED NATIONS ALL WORLDWIDE RIGHTS RESERVED III CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1 I. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN ARMED CONFLICT: LEGAL SOURCES, PRINCIPLES AND ACTORS ............................. 4 A. Sources of international human rights law and international humanitarian law ........................................................... 7 B. Principles of international human rights law and international humanitarian law ......................................... 14 C. Duty bearers in international human rights law and international humanitarian law ........................................ 21 II. REQUIREMENTS, LIMITATIONS AND EFFECTS OF THE CONCURRENT APPLICABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN ARMED CONFLICT .... 32 A. Armed conflict as the trigger............................................ 33 B. Territory and applicability of international human rights law and international humanitarian law .................................. 42 C. Limitations on the application of international human rights law and international humanitarian law protections............ 46 D.