DOCSLIB.ORG

Style Gude for the Presentation Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Style Gude for the Presentation Of Title: CHILDREN FIRST, OFFENDERS SECOND An aspiration or a reality for youth justice in Wales Name: Susan Thomas This is a digitised version of a dissertation submitted to the University of Bedfordshire. It is available to view only. This item is subject to copyright. CHILDREN FIRST, OFFENDERS SECOND An aspiration or a reality for youth justice in Wales Sue Thomas Professional Doctorate in Leadership in Children and Young People’s Services 2015 UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE CHILDREN FIRST, OFFENDERS SECOND An aspiration or a reality for youth justice in Wales Susan Brace Thomas ABSTRACT England and Wales have the same criminal justice system, but devolution in Wales has created some differences between the two countries. In Wales all child and young person related services, with the exception of youth justice, are devolved to the Welsh Government. It is claimed by some that devolution has resulted in youth justice policy in Wales diverging from that of England. This is because of the Welsh Government’s adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which has been incorporated into its domestic legislation. This is not mirrored in England, as the UK Government’s youth justice policies during the New Labour period have been characterised as punitive, risk-led and managerialist. Although attitudes and approaches changed during the Coalition Government’s administration, the fundamental features of the system have not. Youth justice in Wales has been described as taking a ‘children first, offenders second’ approach to children and young people in trouble with the law, which by inference suggests the opposite for youth justice in England. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a different youth justice in Wales. This was done by scrutinising a range of evidence that included the policies of the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales and the Welsh Government and the interface and relationship between them, to determine what youth justice in Wales looks like and how it compares to youth justice in England. This was supported by an analysis of YJB data about the operation of the system, which disaggregated information about Wales from national statistics, to establish if outcomes for young people in Wales differed from their counter-parts in England. Finally, the perspectives of practitioners in two youth offending teams in England and two in Wales were explored to establish what their practice cultures looked like and the extent to which practitioners had similar or different views about how the system should and does operate, whether a ‘children first’ philosophy is dominant in Wales and how this relates to the policy positions of the respective governments. ii Table of contents Abstract .................................................................................................. ii List of appendices .................................................................................. vii List of charts ........................................................................................... viii List of tables ............................................................................................ x Acknowledgements ................................................................................ xi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Rationale ................................................................................... 3 1.3 Research aims ............................................................................ 4 1.4 Structure of thesis ....................................................................... 5 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 Comparative youth justice .......................................................... 8 2.2 The availability of literature on youth justice in Wales ................. 9 2.3 UK Government – New Labour .................................................. 10 2.4 UK Government – Coalition Government .................................... 13 Freedoms and flexibilities 2.5 Contrasting the UK governments positions ................................. 17 2.6 The Welsh Government – devolution and a different direction ..................................................................................... 18 Children’s Rights Extending Entitlement 2.7 Comparing the UK Government and Welsh Government positions ………………………………………………………... 21 2.8 The All Wales Youth Offending Strategy ..................................... 23 2.9 Welsh Youth Justice – ‘dragonisation’ ....................................... 25 2.10 The practice landscape in England and in Wales ........................ 26 Swansea YOT 2.11 The next stage …………………………………………………. 31 iii CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY 34 3.1 Determining the approach ......................................................... 34 3.2 Literature search ........................................................................ 35 Government statistical information 3.3 The YOT sample ........................................................................ 37 3.4 Participant sample ...................................................................... 39 3.5 Ethics… ...................................................................................... 40 3.6 Research tools ............................................................................ 41 Surveys Interview schedule 3.7 Data analysis .............................................................................. 44 3.8 Surveys returned and interviews obtained .................................. 44 3.9 Limitations ................................................................................. 45 CHAPTER FOUR: THE WALES AND WESTMINSTER INTERFACE 47 4.1 Context ......................................................................................... 47 4.2 Taking Wales into account ........................................................... 48 4.3 The YJB and Welsh Government relationship .............................. 49 4.4 The YJB’s role in Wales ................................................................ 51 YJB activities 4.5 Welsh Government policy developments ..................................... 54 4.6 Youth justice legislation in Wales .................................................. 55 4.7 The devolution of youth justice .................................................... 58 4.8 Co-existence ................................................................................ 60 CHAPTER FIVE: PARALLEL AND EQUIVALENT YOUTH JUSTICE IN WALES 62 5.1 Statutory functions and funding ................................................. 62 5.2 Comparable services .................................................................. 65 5.3 Rurality ...................................................................................... 69 5.4 Re-offending .............................................................................. 69 5.5 A similar landscape .................................................................... 71 iv CHAPTER SIX: PRACTICE CULTURES IN YOTS 72 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 72 6.2 The ranking exercise .................................................................. 72 Differences within teams The comparative picture 6.3 Youth offending team culture ...................................................... 76 England A Wales A England B Wales B 6.4 Summary of influences on practice ………………………….. 88 6.5 Influence of the All Wales Youth Offending Strategy ................... 92 The influence of the YOT manager CHAPTER SEVEN: TARGETED PREVENTION 99 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 99 7.2 Prevention and early intervention................................................ 99 7.3 UK government policy shift – 2008 onwards .............................. 102 7.4 The Welsh Government’s position ............................................. 103 7.5 The efficacy of prevention ........................................................... 104 7.6 Anti-social behaviour…. .............................................................. 106 7.7 Targeted prevention services – findings from the fieldwork …. ................................................................................... 109 Targeted prevention and preventing criminalisation The role of Children’s Services in prevention Other preventative activity The effectiveness of prevention as a service Addressing needs and linking to other services The role of the practitioner as a broker/advocate CHAPTER EIGHT: PRE-COURT DIVERSION 122 8.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 122 8.2 Pre-court diversion ..................................................................... 122 8.3 The first time entrant target ......................................................... 123 v 8.4 The impact of pre-court diversion................................................ 124 Triage Wales and the Bureau 8.5 The four YOTs in the study…. .................................................... 133 Punishment for criminal acts Prioritising informal diversion 8.6 Reductions in first time entrants .................................................. 136 8.7 Impact on caseloads .................................................................. 140 8.8 Consensus on pre-court diversion .............................................. 142 CHAPTER NINE: THE USE OF
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Past and the Future of Law in Wales
    The Past and the Future of Law in Wales Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd 27 October 2017, Pierhead Building, Cardiff Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University Law Building Museum Avenue Cardiff CF10 3AX Email: [email protected] Web: http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/wgc About us The Wales Governance Centre is a research centre that forms part of Cardiff University’s School of Law and Politics undertaking innovative research into all aspects of the law, politics, government and political economy of Wales, as well the wider UK and European contexts of territorial governance. A key objective of the Centre is to facilitate and encourage informed public debate of key developments in Welsh governance not only through its research, but also through events and postgraduate teaching. Public Law Wales aims to promote discussion, education and research in Wales relating to public law and human rights. It also aims to promote expertise amongst lawyers practising in Wales in the fields of public law and human rights. LORD THOMAS OF CWMGEIDD After reading law at Cambridge and the University of Chicago, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd was a practising barrister in England and Wales specialising in commercial law (1971-1996), a Judge of the High Court and Court of Appeal of England and Wales (1996-2011) during which he was successively a Presiding Judge in Wales, Judge in charge of the Commercial Court, Senior Presiding Judge of England and Wales and deputy Head of Criminal Justice. He was President of the Queen’s Bench Division (2011-13) and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (2013- 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrexham (Gas Fired Power Station) Order
    The Wrexham (Gas Fired Power Station) Order 6.4.3 Volume 4: Environmental Statement Appendix 8.3: Consultation Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 PINS Reference Number: EN010055 Document Reference Number: 6.4.3 Regulation Number: 5(2) (a) Lead Author: Atkins Revision: Date: Description: 0 March 2016 Submission version SEC6.4-ES Appendix TABS.indd 16 10/03/2016 09:48 WREXHAM ENERGY CENTRE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Appendix 8.3 Air Quality Consultation CONSULTATION E-MAILS 8.1.1 Key e-mail correspondence follows between Atkins’ air quality specialists and statutory consultees: Natural Resources Wales –Khalid Aazem, Conservation Officer Natural Resources Wales – Anna Lewis, Principal Permitting Officer Wrexham County Borough Council – Paul Campini, Environmental Health Officer A8-1 WREXHAM ENERGY CENTRE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT From: Paul Campini [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 February 2016 14:03 To: Horrocks, Sarah <[email protected]> Cc: Spencer, Jenny <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Wrexham Power Hi Sarah I am still the air quality contact at WCBC. The only change of relevance is that the continuous monitoring site at Isycoed was closed on the 1st Jan. The diffusion tube network is still in operation and I’ve attached the results for 2016. These haven’t been ratified nor have they been BAF corrected as I am waiting for the national spreadsheet to be updated. The monitoring data for 2015 is on the Welsh Air Quality website but I’m not sure whether it’s been ratified yet. In terms of methodology, your proposal to use the new guidance documents would seem wise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Learning Insight Into Demography
    A LEARNING INSIGHT INTO DEMOGRAPHY prepared by BMG Research for A Learning Insight into Demography Table of Contents 1. Summary and discussion ................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................ 1 What is ‘demography’........................................................................ 1 Total population change ................................................................... 3 Change in the age structure of the population ............................... 3 Population distribution within Wales............................................... 7 Ethnic minorities in Wales ................................................................ 8 Wealth, poverty and social class...................................................... 9 Gender .............................................................................................. 12 Summary........................................................................................... 13 2. Technical report: introduction....................................................... 15 Scope of report ................................................................................ 15 Sources and references .................................................................. 16 Structure of report ........................................................................... 16 3. Total population and age structure................................................ 17 Introduction.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TGC-Barriers-To-BAME-Women Full
    1 Contents Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Literature Review ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.1. Diversity within Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups ........................................ 7 2.2. Experiences of BAME women in (self)employment ............................................................. 11 2.2.1. In employment .............................................................................................................. 11 2.2.2. In self-employment ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3. Qualifications and promotion opportunities ................................................................ 15 2.3. Barriers to BAME women in employment ............................................................................ 17 2.3.1. Gender and Ethnicity Pay Gap ...................................................................................... 18 2.3.2. Bias, discrimination and racism .................................................................................... 19 2.3.3. Poverty and lack of resources ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Issues in Wales: a Research Review
    Research report: 11 Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2009 First published Spring 2009 ISBN 978 1 84206 089 6 Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Equality and Human Rights Commission’s research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com/researchreports If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] CONTENTS Page CHAPTER AUTHORS i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 This Report 1 1.2 Demography of Wales 2 1.3 Governance of Wales 12 1.4 Devolution and Equality 13 1.5 Conclusion 17 2. POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 18 2.1 Policy Context 18 2.2 Household Income and Poverty 19 2.3 Benefits and Pensions 28 2.4 Savings, Credit and Debt, and Financial Exclusion 31 2.5 Water and Fuel Poverty 35 2.6 Digital Inclusion 37 2.7 Culture, Leisure and Sport 38 2.8 Access to Advice, Support and Justice 42 2.9 Transport 44 2.10 Conclusions and Research Gaps 51 3.
    [Show full text]
  • World Prison Population List Eleventh Edition Roy Walmsley
    World Prison Population List eleventh edition Roy Walmsley Introduction This eleventh edition of the World Prison Population List gives details of the number of prisoners held in 223 prison systems in independent countries and dependent territories. It shows the differences in the levels of imprisonment across the world and makes possible an estimate of the world prison population total. The figures include both pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners and those who have been convicted and sentenced. The information is the latest available at the end of October 2015. The data are presented in two parts. Part one, tables 1-5, sets out prison population totals, rates and trends for each individual country. Part two, tables 6-8, provides data on prison population totals, rates and trends by continent, and includes comparison of male and female prison population levels. The World Prison Population List*, like the World Female Imprisonment List (the third edition of which was published in September 2015) and the World Pre-trial/ Remand Imprisonment List (second edition published in 2014) complement the information held on the World Prison Brief. This is an online database available at www.prisonstudies.org, and is updated monthly. The World Prison Population List is compiled from a variety of sources. In almost all cases the original source is the national prison administration of the country concerned, or else the Ministry responsible for the prison administration. Most of the figures are recent and efforts are continually made to update them and to obtain information on the number of prisoners in the countries on which figures are not currently available (Eritrea, Somalia and the Democratic People’s Republic of (North) Korea) or are incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Dispensing in Primary Care in Wales (2006 – 2008)
    National Public Health Service for Wales Antimicrobial Dispensing in Primary Care in Wales Antimicrobial Dispensing In Primary Care in Wales (2006 – 2008) Authors: Maggie Heginbothom Date: Status: Final Robin Howe 18/11/09 Report entitled ‘Antimicrobial Dispensing Welsh Antimicrobial Resistance Programme: in Primary Care in Wales’ Surveillance Unit Executive Summary This is the first report from the Welsh Antimicrobial Resistance Programme Surveillance Unit regarding antimicrobial usage in primary care, and is aimed at providing an overview of antimicrobial prescriptions prescribed by general practices and dispensed in primary care in Wales Key points of note are: Antimicrobial usage in primary care in Wales is common In 2008, there were 2,417,104 antimicrobial prescription items dispensed. This equates to almost 1 antibiotic for every member of the population. Antimicrobial use has increased from 2006 Between 2006 and 2007 antimicrobial dispensing increased from 538.9 to 570.2 prescriptions/1000 PUs* (5.8% increase). However, from 2007 to 2008 there was little change in the All-Wales dispensing rate. Antimicrobial use, in terms of amount, varies between Local Health Boards (LHBs) In 2008, dispensing varied from 487.9 prescriptions/1000 PUs per annum to 659.5 prescriptions/1000 PUs per annum. Antimicrobial use, in terms of agents selected, varies between Local Health Boards (LHBs) For example, the percentage use by LHBs of different oral tetracyclines was: oxytetracycline 20-49%, doxycycline 15-48%, lymecycline 5-33%, and minocycline 7-16%. The proportion of total dispensing of antimicrobials that are included in the “Top 9” (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, erythromycin, flucloxacillin, nitrofurantoin, oxytetracycline, penicillin V and trimethoprim) ranged from 70-79%.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Echinococcus Granulosus and Echinococcus Equinus in Dogs and Epidemiology of Canine Echinococcosis in the UK
    Detection of Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus equinus in Dogs and Epidemiology of Canine Echinococcosis in the UK WAI SAN LETT A thesis submitted for the partial requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) University of Salford School of Environment and Life Sciences 2013 Abstract Echinococcus granulosus is a canid cestode species that causes hydatid disease or cystic echinococcosis (CE) in domestic animals or humans. Echinococcus equinus formerly recognised as the ‘horse strain’ (E.granulosus genotype G4) is not known to be zoonotic and predominantly involves equines as its intermediate host. The domestic dog is the main definitive host for both species, which are also both endemic in the UK but data is lacking especially for E.equinus. An E.equinus-specific PCR assay was designed to amplify a 299bp product within the ND2 gene and expressed 100% specificity against a panel of 14 other cestode species and showed detection sensitivity up to 48.8pg (approx. 6 eggs). Horse hydatid cyst isolates (n = 54) were obtained from 14 infected horse livers collected from an abattoir in Nantwich, Cheshire and hydatid cyst tissue was amplified using the ND2 PCR primers to confirm the presence of E.equinus and used to experimentally infect dogs in Tunisia from which serial post-infection faecal samples were collected for coproanalysis, and indicated Echinococcus coproantigen and E.equinus DNA was present in faeces by 7 and 10 days post infection, respectively. Canine echinococcosis due to E.granulosus appears to have re-emerged in South Powys (Wales) and in order to determine the prevalence of canine echinococcosis a coproantigen survey was undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Equality and Human Rights in Wales
    Communities, Equality and Local Government Committee The future of equality and human rights in Wales August 2013 The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this report can be found on the National Assembly’s website: www.assemblywales.org Copies of this report can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print; audio or hard copy from: Communities, Equality and Local Government Committee National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 029 2089 8505 Fax: 029 2089 8021 Email: [email protected] © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2013 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. Communities, Equality and Local Government Committee The future of equality and human rights in Wales August 2013 Communities, Equality and Local Government Committee The Committee was established on 22 June 2011 with a remit to examine legislation and hold the Welsh Government to account by scrutinising expenditure, administration and policy matters encompassing: Wales’s culture; languages; communities and heritage, including sport and the arts; local government in Wales, including all
    [Show full text]
  • Council REPORT NO
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 REPORT TO: Council REPORT NO: CLF / 12 / 13 DATE: 22 May 2013 LEAD MEMBER: Councillor Malcolm King OBE (Policy, Finance, Performance and Governance) CONTACT OFFICER: Morgan Jones (Tel: 292263) SUBJECT: The Council Plan 2013-17 WARD: All Wards 1. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT To seek Member approval for the proposed Council Plan 2013-17 and for the outcome indicators, targets and improvement activity set out within it. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 The Council Plan is the overarching plan for the Council. It sets out where we will focus our energies and resources, how we will judge our performance and what the Council’s contribution to ‘Our Wrexham Plan ‘ – Wrexham Local Service Board’s single integrated plan - will be. It is also the means by which the Council agrees its improvement objectives as required by the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2009 and as such is a key focus for our regulators. 2.2 The framework for the Council Plan was developed through a review of the Council’s existing and emerging strategies and the needs assessments and engagement work that underpins them. It also considered Members’ reflections, statutory guidance and comments from regulators – particularly Wales Audit Office concerns regarding appropriate outcomes and measures. 2.3 In December 2011 Executive Board approved a Council Plan framework for 2012-16 to reflect the four year electoral cycle upon which the Council operated. Council then approved this framework in March 2012. As this has now been extended to a five year electoral cycle, it is recommended that the Council Plan is similarly extended to 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rough Sleeping Count, Wales, 2007 and 2008
    STATISTICAL ARTICLE ERTHYGL YSTADEGOL National Rough Sleeping Count, Wales, 2007 and 2008 This article covers the national rough sleeper counts which were carried out in March 2007 and again in March 2008 by local authorities, in partnership with other local agencies, in order to gauge the extent of rough sleeping in Wales. The article highlights the issues associated with single-night rough sleeper counts and their likely influence on the accuracy of information on levels of rough sleeping across Wales. 1. Summary • There are a range of factors which can impact on single-night counts of rough sleepers, including location, timing and weather. • The counts carried out in March 2007 and 2008 in Wales are essentially snapshot estimates and can provide only a very broad indication of rough sleeping levels on the night of the count. • Latest data from March 2008 shows that the number of rough sleepers across Wales is likely to be in the range of 128 to 165 people. 2. Results A full set of results, from both the March 2007 and the March 2008 count, are provided in tables 1 and 2. The data shown in these tables however provide only a very broad indication of the level of rough sleeping across Wales. Data based solely upon the observations made by local authority representatives on the night of the count may, as stated in Section 5, be affected by a number of factors including severe weather, inaccessibility to certain areas, local knowledge and other factors specific to a locality. As shown in tables 1 and 2: • In March 2007 local authorities observed 69 individuals sleeping rough and a further 69 instances of other evidence of rough sleeping, leading to a total estimate of 138 rough sleepers in Wales on the night of the count.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheladevi Nair
    A study of the experiences and perceptions of parents of Black and Minority Ethnic pupils statemented with autism in relation to the educational support provided for their children and for themselves. by Sheladevi Nair A thesis submitted to Cardiff Metropolitan University in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Education Cardiff Metropolitan University May 2015 ABSTRACT This study investigates the experiences and perceptions of parents of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) pupils statemented with autism of the support they receive for their child in education and for themselves. These perceptions are explored alongside the views of stakeholders in education who work to support these pupils and parents. The study expands upon the work of Perepa (2008) who investigated the cultural influences on the understanding of appropriate social behaviour by BME parents of children within the autism spectrum in a London borough. Since then there has been minimal research on BME parents’ experiences of having a child with autism in education, so this study addresses a gap in research. A qualitative case study approach was adopted using in-depth interviews with participants from one selected local authority in Wales. An interpretivist approach was used to gain an understanding of the researched phenomena within a cultural context. The data was managed for thematic analysis using the qualitative analysis software tool, NVivo. The findings reveal that BME parents receive support from the providers within education rather than from their own ethnic communities. They show a preference for mainstream education, although evidence here suggests that there are fewer specialist resources in these schools compared to special schools.
    [Show full text]