Ezekiel Chapter Forty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ezekiel Chapter Forty EZEKIEL CHAPTER FORTY PROPHET - DATE KING / EVENT - DATE JONAH (825-785BC)? JOEL (800BC)? HOSEA (785-725BC)? TIGLATH-PILESER (745-727BC)? MICAH (785-710BC)? HEZEKIAH (JUDAH) (726-698BC)? AMOS (784BC)? SHALMANESER (727-722BC)? ISAIAH (701-681BC)? ISRAEL TAKEN CAPTIVE (722BC)? NAHUM (700BC)? SENNACHERIB (705-681BC)? ZEPHANIAH (630BC)? JEREMIAH (629-588BC)? NEBUCHADNEZZAR (605-562BC)? DANIEL (606-534BC)? ZEDEKIAH (JUDAH) (597-586BC)? HABAKKUK (598BC)? JUDAH TAKEN CAPTIVE (586BC)? EZEKIEL (597-573BC)? BELSHAZZAR (541-523BC)? OBADIAH (588-562BC)? CYRUS (559-529BC)? EZRA (536-456BC)? BABYLON DESTROYED (536BC)? HAGGAI (532-512BC)? DARIUS (511-475BC)? ZECHARIAH (520-475BC)? ESTHER (485-465BC)? NEHEMIAH (465-424BC)? MALACHI (420-397BC)? OUTLINE EZEKIEL CHAPTER FORTY END OF PREVIOUS VISION V. 1-5 THE EAST GATE V. 6-19 THE NORTH GATE V. 20-22 THE SOUTH GATE V. 24-31 MORE ON THE EAST GATE V. 32-34 MORE ON THE NORTH GATE V. 35-38 THE EIGHT TABLES V. 39-43 THE CHAMBERS V. 44-47 THE PORCH OF THE TEMPLE V. 48-49 MEASUREMENTS 1 CUBIT = 18 INCHES = 1.5 FEET FURLONG = 200 METERS = 600 FEET = 1/8 MILE 1 ROD = 6 CUBITS = 9 FEET OR 1 ROD = 6 (1 CUBITS + 1 HANDBREATH) = 10.5 FEET HANDS BREATH = 3 INCHES READ: EZEKIEL 40:1 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE 1 In the twenty-fifth year of our captivity, at the beginning of the year, on the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year after the city was captured, on the very same day the hand of the LORD was upon me; and He took me there. QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:1 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE 1 In the twenty-fifth year of our captivity, at the beginning of the year, on the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year after the city was captured, on the very same day the hand of the LORD was upon me; and He took me there. WHAT YEAR IS THIS? ‘the twenty-fifth year of our captivity’ WHAT DAY IS THIS? ‘the tenth day of the first month, in the fourteenth year’ after the city was captured QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:1 1 In the twenty-fifth year of our captivity, at the beginning of the year, on the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year after the city was captured, on the very same day the hand of the LORD was upon me; and He took me there. WHAT DAY IS THIS? ‘the twenty-fifth year of our captivity’ READ: 2 KINGS 25:8 8 And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month (which was the nineteenth year of King Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon), Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem. NKJV WHAT DAY WAS JERUSALEM CAPTURED? ‘the fifth month, the seventh day, the nineteenth year’ of King Nebuchadnezzar QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:1 WHAT DAY IS THIS? ‘the tenth day of the first month, in the fourteenth year’ after the city was captured READ: JEREMIAH 39:1-2 1 In the ninth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the tenth month, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and all his army came against Jerusalem, and besieged it. 2 In the eleventh year of Zedekiah, in the fourth month, on the ninth day of the month, the city was penetrated. NKJV WHAT DAY WAS JERUSALEM CAPTURED? ‘the eleventh year, the fourth month, the ninth day’ of King Zedekiah QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:1 WHAT DAY IS THIS? ‘the tenth day of the first month, in the fourteenth year’ after the city was captured READ: JEREMIAH 52:5-6 5 …. the city was besieged until the eleventh year of King Zedekiah. 6 By the fourth month, on the ninth day of the month, the famine had become so severe in the city that there was no food for the people of the land. WHAT DAY WAS JERUSALEM CAPTURED? ‘the eleventh year, the fourth month, the ninth day’ of King Zedekiah READ: EZEKIEL 40:2-3 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE 2 In the visions of God He took me into the land of Israel and set me on a very high mountain; on it toward the south was something like the structure of a city. 3 He took me there, and behold, there was a man whose appearance was like the appearance of bronze. He had a line of flax and a measuring rod in his hand, and he stood in the gateway. QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2-3 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE 2 In the visions of God He took me into the land of Israel and set me on a very high mountain; on it toward the south was something like the structure of a city. 3 He took me there, and behold, there was a man whose appearance was like the appearance of bronze. He had a line of flax and a measuring rod in his hand, and he stood in the gateway. WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? ‘something like the structure of a city‘ ‘a man stood in the gateway’ ‘a measuring rod in his hand’ ‘he stood in the gateway’ QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHAT DID THE PSALMIST SAY ABOUT THIS CITY? READ: PSALMS 48:1-2 1 Great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised In the city of our God, In His holy mountain. 2 Beautiful in elevation, The joy of the whole earth, Is Mount Zion on the sides of the north, The city of the great King. NKJV QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHERE SHOULD ISRAEL WORSHIP THE LORD? READ: EZEKIEL 20:40 40 ‘On My holy mountain, on the mountain height of Israel,’ says the Lord GOD, ‘there all the house of Israel, all of them in the land, shall serve Me; there I will accept them, and there I will require your offerings and the first- fruits of your sacrifices, together with all your holy things.’ NKJV QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHERE WILL THE LORD REBUILD HIS HOUSE? READ: ISAIAH 2:2 2 Now it shall come to pass in the latter days That the mountain of the LORD‘S house Shall be established on the top of the mountains, And shall be exalted above the hills; And all nations shall flow to it. NKJV QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHEN WILL THE LORD RE-BUILD HIS HOUSE? READ: MICAH 4:1 1Now it shall come to pass in the latter days That the mountain of the LORD‘S house Shall be established on the top of the mountains, And shall be exalted above the hills; And peoples shall flow to it. NKJV QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHERE WILL THE LORD RE-BUILD HIS CITY? READ: JEREMIAH 31:38-39 38 ‘Behold, the days are coming’, says the LORD, ‘that the city shall be built for the LORD from the Tower of Hananel to the Corner Gate.’ NKJV WHERE WAS THE TOWER OF HANANEL? ‘on the north wall of Jerusalem’ QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:2 A NEW CITY, A NEW TEMPLE WHERE DID THE LORD TAKE EZEKIEL? ‘He took me into the land of Israel’ ‘He set me on a very high mountain’ WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? something like the structure of a city WHAT CITY WILL THE LORD RE-BUILD? JERUSALEM? READ: ZECHARIAH 14:10 10 All the land shall be turned into a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem. Jerusalem shall be raised up and inhabited in her place from Benjamin's Gate to the place of the First Gate and the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the king's winepresses. NKJV QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:3 WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? ‘there was a man whose appearance was like the appearance of bronze’ ‘He had a line of flax and a measuring rod in his hand’ ‘he stood in the gateway’ WHAT DID ZECHARIAH SEE? READ: ZECHARIAH 2:1-2 1 I raised my eyes and looked, and behold, a man with a measuring line in his hand. 2 So I said, ‘Where are you going?’ He said to me, ‘To measure Jerusalem, to see what is its width and what is its length.’ NKJV WHAT WAS THE MAN GOING TO DO? ‘measure Jerusalem’ QUESTIONS: EZEKIEL 40:3 WHAT DID EZEKIEL SEE? ‘there was a man whose appearance was like the appearance of bronze’ ‘He had a line of flax and a measuring rod in his hand’ ‘he stood in the gateway’ READ: REVELATION 1:13-15 13 In the midst of the seven lamp-stands One like the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the feet and girded about the chest with a golden band.
Recommended publications
  • HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS in the SOLOMON NARRATIVE of 1 KINGS 1–11 John A
    HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS IN THE SOLOMON NARRATIVE OF 1 KINGS 1–11 John A. Davies Summary The narrative in 1 Kings 1–11 makes use of the literary device of sevenfold lists of items and sevenfold recurrences of Hebrew words and phrases. These heptadic patterns may contribute to the cohesion and sense of completeness of both the constituent pericopes and the narrative as a whole, enhancing the readerly experience. They may also serve to reinforce the creational symbolism of the Solomon narrative and in particular that of the description of the temple and its dedication. 1. Introduction One of the features of Hebrew narrative that deserves closer attention is the use (consciously or subconsciously) of numeric patterning at various levels. In narratives, there is, for example, frequently a threefold sequence, the so-called ‘Rule of Three’1 (Samuel’s three divine calls: 1 Samuel 3:8; three pourings of water into Elijah’s altar trench: 1 Kings 18:34; three successive companies of troops sent to Elijah: 2 Kings 1:13), or tens (ten divine speech acts in Genesis 1; ten generations from Adam to Noah, and from Noah to Abram; ten toledot [‘family accounts’] in Genesis). One of the numbers long recognised as holding a particular fascination for the biblical writers (and in this they were not alone in the ancient world) is the number seven. Seven 1 Vladimir Propp, Morphology of the Folktale (rev. edn; Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968; tr. from Russian, 1928): 74; Christopher Booker, The Seven Basic Plots of Literature: Why We Tell Stories (London: Continuum, 2004): 229-35; Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Sacrifices in the Millennium
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 Why Sacrifices in The Millennium Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "Why Sacrifices in The Millennium" (2009). Article Archives. 60. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/60 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHY LITERAL SACRIFICES IN THE MILLENNIUM Tom's Perspectives by Thomas Ice A common objection to the consistent literal interpretation of Bible prophecy is found in Ezekiel’s Temple vision (Ezek. 40—48). Opponents argue that if this is a literal, future Temple, then it will require a return to the sacrificial system that Christ made obsolete since the prophet speaks of “atonement” (kiper) in Ezekiel 43:13, 27; 45:15, 17, 20. This is true! Critics believe this to be a blasphemous contradiction to the finished work of Christ as presented in Hebrews 10. Hank Hanegraaff says that I have “exacerbated the problem by stating that without animal sacrifices in the Millennium, Yahweh’s holiness would be defiled. That, for obvious reasons, is blasphemous.” He further says that such a view constitutes a return “to Old Covenant sacrifices.”1 “Is it heretical to believe that a Temple and sacrifices will once again exist,” ask John Schmitt and Carl Laney? “Ezekiel himself believed it was a reality and the future home of Messiah.
    [Show full text]
  • The New 'Ain Dara Temple: Closest Solomonic Parallel1
    The New ‘Ain Dara Temple: Closest Solomonic Parallel1 By John Monson A stunning parallel to Solomon’s Temple has been discovered in northern Syria. The temple at ‘Ain Dara has far more in common with the Jerusalem Temple described in the Book of Kings than any other known building. Yet the newly excavated temple has received almost no attention in this country, at least partially because the impressive excavation report, published a decade ago, was written in German by a Syrian scholar and archaeologist. For centuries, readers of the Bible have tried to envision Solomon’s glorious Jerusalem Temple, dedicated to the Israelite God, Yahweh. Nothing of Solomon’s Temple remains today; the Babylonians destroyed it utterly in 586 B.C.E. And the vivid Biblical descriptions are of limited help in reconstructing the building: Simply too many architectural terms have lost their meaning over the ensuing centuries, and too many details are absent from the text. Slowly, however, archaeologists are beginning to fill in the gaps in our knowledge of Solomon’s building project. For years, pride of place went to the temple at Tell Ta‘yinat, also in northern Syria. When it was discovered in 1936, the Tell Ta‘yinat temple, unlike the ‘Ain Dara temple, caused a sensation because of its similarities to Solomon’s Temple. Yet the ‘Ain Dara temple is closer in time to Solomon’s Temple by about a century (it is, in fact, essentially contemporaneous), is much closer in size to Solomon’s Temple than the smaller Tell Ta‘yinat temple, has several features found in Solomon’s Temple but not in the Tell Ta‘yinat temple, and is far better preserved than the Tell Ta‘yinat temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Chronology of the Old Testament the Following Chronological List Is Adapted from the Chronological Bible
    Old Testament Overview The Christian Bible is divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The word “testament” can also be translated as “covenant” or “relationship.” The Old Testament describes God’s covenant of law with the people of Israel. The New Testament describes God’s covenant of grace through Jesus Christ. When we accept Jesus as our Savior and Lord, we enter into a new relationship with God. Christians believe that ALL Scripture is “God-breathed.” God’s Word speaks to our lives, revealing God’s nature. The Lord desires to be in relationship with His people. By studying the Bible, we discover how to enter into right relationship with God. We also learn how Christians are called to live in God’s kingdom. The Old Testament is also called the Hebrew Bible. Jewish theologians use the Hebrew word “Tanakh.” The term describes the three divisions of the Old Testament: the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im), and the Writings (Ketuvim). “Tanakh” is composed of the first letters of each section. The Law in Hebrew is “Torah” which literally means “teaching.” In the Greek language, it is known as the Pentateuch. It comprises the first five books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. This section contains the stories of Creation, the patriarchs and matriarchs, the exodus from Egypt, and the giving of God’s Law, including the Ten Commandments. The Prophets cover Israel’s history from the time the Jews entered the Promised Land of Israel until the Babylonian captivity of Judah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building of the First Temple
    Forschungen zum Alten Testament Herausgegeben von Konrad Schmid (Zürich) · Mark S. Smith (New York) Hermann Spieckermann (Göttingen) 103 Peter Dubovsky´ The Building of the First Temple A Study in Redactional, Text-Critical and Historical Perspective Mohr Siebeck Peter Dubovsky´, born 1965; 1999 SSL; 2005 ThD; currently dean at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome and professor of the Old Testament and history. ISBN 978-3-16-153837-7 ISSN 0940-4155 (Forschungen zum Alten Testament) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Gulde Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. To my friend John W. O’Malley Preface The project that led to this book started in 2008 when I was preparing a course on 1 Kings 1–11 at the Pontifical Biblical Institute. It was completed thanks to a generous grant from Georgetown University, which offered me a Jesuit Chair (2014). This book would not have been possible without the constant support of my fellow Jesuits, my colleagues at the Pontifical Biblical Institute, and
    [Show full text]
  • Menorah I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II. Judaism
    645 Menorah 646 tory of the Anabaptists and the Mennonites (Scottdale, Pa. 1993). cal Jewish interpretation of the Exodus texts, which ■ Loewen R./C. Snyder, Seeking Places of Peace: Global Mennonite present contradictory information about the num- History Series: North America (Intercourse, Pa. 2012). ■ Valla- ber and shape of the lamps. The menorah was dares, J. P., Mission and Migration: Global Mennonite History among the objects taken from the temple by Antio- Series: Latin America (Intercourse, Pa. 2010). chus Epiphanes in 167 BCE (1 Macc 1:21; Josephus Derek Cooper Ant. 12.250). Whereas 1 Macc used the singular See also / Anabaptists; / Hutterites; / Ley- form, Josephus mentions that menorot were re- den, Jan van; / Reformation moved. The Maccabean restoration of the temple in- cluded an improvised menorah of iron rods overlaid with tin (bMen 28b). That these rods numbered Menorah seven (MegTa 9) is the first mention of a seven- branched menorah in the Hasmonean period I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament (Hachlili: 22). After Judas Maccabeus purified the II. Judaism III. Christianity temple in 165 BCE, new sacred objects were made IV. Visual Arts for it including a menorah (1 Macc 4:49). This men- orah apparently had seven branches because multi- I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament ple lamps were lit on the menorah to provide light for the temple (v. 50). In 39 BCE the menorah The Hebrew word me˘nôrâ (LXX λυχνία) refers gener- paired with the table of showbread appeared on a ally to a lampstand whose function was to light a lepton coin issued by Mattathias Antigonos (40–37 room (2 Kgs 4:10).
    [Show full text]
  • 316 Chronology: Timeline of Biblical World History Biblestudying.Net
    Chronology 316: Timeline of Biblical World History biblestudying.net Brian K. McPherson and Scott McPherson Copyright 2012 Period Two: From the Birth of Isaac to the Exodus In this section of our study we will present the scriptural data that is relevant to calculating the amount of time from the birth of Isaac to the Israelite Exodus from Egypt. Although it is necessary to do some cross-referencing and comparison of scriptural texts, our discussion of this time period will be simpler than our examination of factors related to the prior period. We will start with Genesis 15:13-16. In Genesis 15:13-16, God tells Abraham that his descendents will be servants in a land that is not their own (Egypt) for 400 years and that they will come out in the fourth generation. Genesis 15:13 And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 14 And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. 15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age. 16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. This passage provides the basic data to begin our understanding of the duration of time from Isaac’s birth to the Exodus. From this passage we learn several things.
    [Show full text]
  • King Solomon's Fall
    King Solomon’s Fall 1 KINGS 11:1-13 Baxter T. Exum (#1482) Four Lakes Church of Christ Madison, Wisconsin January 6, 2019 David Petraeus. Most of us recognize this man as one of the most well known, most successful, and most highly decorated and respected soldiers in the history of this nation. Having graduated in the top 5% of his class at West Point, he went on to serve 37 years in the United States Army. During that time, he continued to earn masters and PhD degrees and to serve as an assistant professor at the United States Military Academy. In many ways, his many accomplishments exceed my ability to explain them. We know that he served as Commander of the United States Central Command, which oversees military efforts in the Middle East. We know that he developed what is now known as the Petraeus Doctrine, a comprehensive plan for overcoming the kind of insurgency that we’ve seen in Iraq and Afghanistan. We also know that in 2011 Petraeus was nominated by President Obama to serve as Director of the CIA and was confirmed in the senate by an unheard-of unanimous vote of 94-0, reflecting the tremendous respect that this man had earned over a long and distinguished career. However, we also know what happened next. In November 2012, after an FBI investigation, Petraeus resigned as head of the CIA, amid allegations of an extramarital affair and that he shared classified information with his official biographer, Paula Broadwell. This is a smart, courageous, respected, and highly educated man, and yet near the end of his life he apparently made some terribly unwise decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Theory and the Range of Translations for 'Cedars of Lebanon
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 12 Original Research Editorial theory and the range of translations for ‘cedars of Lebanon’ in the Septuagint cedar] is translated in the majority of cases as] אֶ רֶ ז Authors: Although the Hebrew source text term 1 Cynthia L. Miller-Naudé κέδρος [cedar] or its adjective κέδρινος in the Septuagint, there are cases where the following Jacobus A. Naudé1 translations and strategies are used: (1) κυπάρισσος [cypress] or the related adjective Affiliations: κυπαρίσσινος, (2) ξύλον [wood, tree] and (3) non-translation and deletion of the source text 1Department of Hebrew, item. This article focuses on these range of translations. Using a complexity theoretical University of the Free State, approach in the context of editorial theory (the new science of exploring texts in their South Africa manuscript contexts), this article seeks to provide explanations for the various translation Corresponding author: choices (other than κέδρος and κέδρινος). It further aims to determine which cultural values of Cynthia Miller-Naudé, the translators have influenced those choices and how they shape the metaphorical and [email protected] symbolic meaning of plants as determined by Biblical Plant Hermeneutics, which has placed Dates: the taxonomy of flora on a strong ethnological and ethnobotanical basis. Received: 30 Apr. 2018 Accepted: 21 June 2018 Published: 01 Nov. 2018 Introduction cedar] is translated in the] אֶ רֶ ז How to cite this article: As shown in Naudé and Miller-Naudé (2018), the Hebrew term Miller-Naudé, C.L. & Naudé, Septuagint as κέδρος [cedar] or with the adjectival form κέδρινος in 65 cases.
    [Show full text]
  • EZEKIEL 40:L AS a CORRECTIVE for SEVEN WRONG IDEAS I N
    Andrews Uniwrsio Seminary Stndic~,Vol. 44, No. 2,265-283. Copyright 8 2006 Andrews University Press. EZEKIEL 40:l AS A CORRECTIVE FOR SEVEN WRONG IDEAS IN BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION RODGER C. YOUNG St. Louis, Missouri Ezekiel 40:l is often viewed by commentators as a mere chronological note that can be passed over quickly before tahng up the formidable task of interpreting the last nine chapters of Ezekiel's book. Yet a careful analysis of this verse, when combined with some knowledge of the various events and institutions to whch the verse makes explicit or implicit reference, shows that it is rich in information that sheds light on the events and institutions to whch it refers. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the five pieces of chronological data given in the verse provide useful correctives to several ideas that have gained widespread currency in biblical and hstorical interpretation, while at the same time allowing us to replace those ideas with counterparts that are more in keeping not only with the information in this verse, but also with the teachng of other Scriptures that deal with these matters. It dlbe shown that this one verse, used in conjunction with a small amount of external hstorical data, contradicts the following seven wrong ideas: The idea that Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians in 586 B.c. The idea that Ezekiel reckoned the calendar year to start in Nisan. The idea that Judah used Nisan years for the reign length of kings. The idea that Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, was always on the First of Tishn.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezekiel “God Strengthens”
    Ezekiel “God Strengthens” By Timothy Sparks TimothySparks.com Historical Background ● Nebuchadnezzar defeated Jerusalem (Jehoiakim) in 605 BC—taking Daniel and other hostages to Babylon ● In 597 BC, because of Judah’s rebellion (Jehoiakim and Jehoiachin) Nebechadnezzar took 10,000 more hostages, including Jehoiachin and Ezekiel to Babylon Historical Background ● Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem and burned the temple in the summer of 586 BC ● Ezekiel experienced a series of visions during the 22 years from 593 to 571 BC, a period which spans the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 Key Words & Phrases ● Glory (~21 times) – “the glory of the Lord” ● 1:28; 3:12, 23; 10:4, 18; 11:23; 43:4-5; 44:4 – “the glory of the God of Israel” ● 8:4; 9:3; 10:19; 11:22; 43:2 ● Son of man (93 times) – 2:1, 3, 6, 8; 3:1, 3, 4, 10, 17, 25 Key Phrases ● “shall/will know” (73 times) – “you shall/will know” (32 times) ● 6:7, 13; 7:4, 9; 37:14 – “they shall/will know” (32-33 times) ● 5:13; 6:10, 14; 7:27; 39:28 ● “. that a prophet has been among them” – 2:5; 33:33 ● “the word of the Lord” (60 times) – 1:3; 3:16; 6:1, 3 Verses to Remember ● 11:19-20 ● 18:4, 19-24, 30-32 ● 20:12 ● 33:7-9, 11 ● 36:22-28 ● 37:11, 23, 27 Overview Outline Chs. 1-24: Judgment on Israel Chs. 25-32: Judgment on the nations Chs. 33-48: Future blessings for Israel Ezekiel 40:5 ● Ezekiel experienced a series of seven visions during the 22 years from 593 to 571 BC, a period which spans the final destruction of Jerusalem in 586 Ezekiel 40:6 Ezekiel 40:7 Ezekiel 40:8-9 Ezekiel 40:10a Ezekiel 40:10b
    [Show full text]
  • Solomon's Dedication Prayer
    Solomon’s Dedication Prayer Bible Background • 1 KINGS 8:22–53; 2 CHRONICLES 6:12–42 Printed Text • 1 KINGS 8:22–30, 52–53 | Devotional Reading • 1 TIMOTHY 2:1–6 Aim for Change By the end of the lesson, we will: ANALYZE the importance of a national temple for Israel, EXPRESS gratitude for God’s faithfulness in covenant relationships, and EMBRACE a worshipful lifestyle in light of God’s continuing goodness. In Focus Claudine and her husband, Gus, moved to Miami, Florida, after they both retired from the Ohio State Police Department. The winter season in Ohio was harsh. They desired to live in a warmer climate. They liked the weather and the people they met. But there was one aspect of living in Miami they disliked. They could not find a church similar to home. One day Brian, their next-door neighbor, invited Gus and Claudine to join him and his wife at church on Sunday. Gus hesitated in responding because Brian attended a nondenominational church. Gus had to convince his wife to go with him. “It will not hurt to just go this one time. I know they are of a different race and worship experience. Maybe it will be a good experience.” Claudine reluctantly went. They attended the 8:00 a.m. worship service with Brian and his wife. When they entered the sanctuary, the praise and worship team was leading the congregation in songs. There were multigenerational families of different nationalities in attendance. After a few minutes, Claudine whispered to Gus, “I feel God’s presence in this place.” The pastor’s sermon inspired them to make a commitment to return for another visit.
    [Show full text]