DOCSLIB.ORG

TRH 26 South African Road Classification and Access Management Manual -I- Road Classification and Access Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Africa COTO Committee of Transport Officials TRH 26 South African Road Classification and Access Management Manual Version 1.0 August 2012 Committee of Transport Officials TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS TRH 26 South African Road Classification and Access Management Manual Version 1.0 August 2012 Committee of Transport Officials Compiled under auspices of the: Roads Coordinating Body (RCB) of the Committee of Transport Officials (COTO) Published by: The South African National Roads Agency Limited PO Box 415, Pretoria, 0001 Disclaimer of Liability The document is provided “as is” without any warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. No warranty or representation are made, either expressed or implied, with respect to fitness of use and no responsibility will be accepted by the Committee or the authors for any losses, damages or claims of any kind, including, without limitation, direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential or any other loss or damage that may be arise from the use of the document. All rights reserved No part of this document may be changed without permission and approval of the Roads Coordinating Body (RCB). However, permission is granted to freely use, copy, print, reproduce or distribute this document. Technical Recommendations for Highways: The Technical Recommendations for Highways consists of a series of publications that describe recommended practice for various aspects related to highway engineering. The documents are based on South African research and experience and have the support and approval of the Committee of Transport Officials (COTO). The documents are primarily aimed at ensuring uniform practice throughout South Africa. Users of the documents must ensure that the latest editions or versions of the document are used. When a document is referred to in other documents, the reference should be to the latest edition or version of the document. Any comments on the document will be welcomed and should be forwarded to the publisher. When appropriate, such comments may be incorporated in future editions of the document. Synopsis: This manual provides guidance to National, Provincial and Municipal spheres of government on the functional classification of roads and the methodology according to which such classification must be undertaken. It also gives guidance on how a road must be managed in order to function effectively in accordance with its classification. This manual establishes a uniform and integrated classification system for the country, which will underpin and inform the planning, development and management of roads. It includes the following important aspects: • The benefits of functional road classification and access management; • The functional classification system according to which roads are classified; • The methodology according to which such classification must be undertaken; • Management requirements (access management) to ensure that the various authorities’ roads can function as intended; and • Retrofit measures that can be implemented in situations where roads are not serving their intended function. In summary, this manual provides detailed descriptions, explanations and methodologies to determine the functional classification of a road as well as manage accesses in the road system. Table of Contents ITEM PAGE Preface i Definitions ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Overview of the Manual 2 2 Benefits of Road Classification And Access Management 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Improved capacity and traffic flow 3 2.3 Improved road safety 4 2.4 Efficient use of scarce resources 5 2.5 More efficient public transport 5 2.6 Equality and equity 5 2.7 Certainty 6 2.8 Land use and transport integration 6 2.9 Social benefits 7 2.10 Environmental quality 7 2.11 Economic benefits 7 3 Road Classification Concepts 10 3.1 Introduction 10 3.2 Accessibility 11 3.3 Mobility and access roads 11 3.4 Mobility and access functions 12 3.5 Earlier functional classification systems 13 3.6 The six class functional road classification system 17 3.7 Administrative classification 17 3.8 Route number classification 18 3.9 Road Traffic Signs Manual classification 18 3.10 Geometric classification 19 3.11 Naming hierarchy 19 3.12 Public transport classification 19 3.13 Super routes 20 3.14 Classification for pavement management systems 20 3.15 Primary, Secondary, Tertiary Classification 20 4 Road Classification Criteria 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Functional road classification criteria 21 4.3 Rural and urban roads 23 4.4 Rural road classification system 23 4.5 Urban road classification system 26 4.6 Additional considerations 31 5 Road Classification Methodology 33 5.1 Introduction 33 5.2 Future year classification 33 5.3 Required information 33 5.4 Rural/Urban transitions 34 5.5 Rural road classification methodology 34 5.6 Urban road classification methodology 35 6 Access Management Concepts 37 6.1 Introduction 37 6.2 Access types 38 6.3 Full intersections and accesses 38 6.4 Partial intersections and accesses 40 6.5 Marginal intersections 41 6.6 U-turn facilities 42 7 Access Management Requirements 43 7.1 Introduction 43 7.2 Provision of access to property 43 7.3 Multiple accesses 44 7.4 Service stations 44 7.5 Rural road typology and intersection control 44 7.6 Urban road typology and intersection control 46 7.7 Intersection spacing and access separation definition 47 7.9 Intersection spacing considerations 48 7.10 Spacing requirements by class 49 7.11 Access separation requirements 49 7.12 Parking 50 7.13 Route numbering requirements 51 7.14 Variance in requirements 51 8 Access Management Typical Features 53 8.1 Introduction 53 8.2 Road access management plans and frameworks 53 8.3 Design speeds 53 8.4 Road reserve width 54 8.5 Pedestrian and cyclists 54 8.6 Public transport facilities 55 8.7 Traffic calming 55 9 Access Management Implementation 57 9.1 Introduction 57 9.2 Implementing access management 57 10 Retrofitting 59 10.1 Introduction 59 10.2 Access relocation or closure 59 10.3 Intersection and access control 60 10.4 Median provision 60 10.5 Parking 60 10.6 Supporting road network 61 10.7 One-way systems 61 10.8 Retrofit techniques in residential areas 61 11 References 63 List of Figures ITEM PAGE Figure 1 Desire Lines of Travel 10 Figure 2 Highway Functional Classification (AASHO, 1964) 13 Figure 3 Movement versus Access (Brindle 1987, 1996) 14 Figure 4 Mobility versus Access Function Based on Road Length (COTO, 2005) 15 Figure 5 Mobility versus Access Function Based on Traffic (COTO, 2005) 15 Figure 6 Road Functional Classification adopted for this Manual 16 Figure 7 Fundamental intersection types 39 Figure 8 Partial and Marginal Access Options 40 Figure 9 Access Spacing and Separation 47 List of Tables ITEM PAGE Table 1 Minimum Spacing between Rural Freeway Interchanges (GDPTRW, 2004) 48 Table 2 Minimum Spacing between Urban Freeway Interchanges (GDPTRW, 2004) 48 Table 3 Minimum Spacing Requirements for full Intersections on Mobility Roads 49 Table 4 Minimum Spacing Recommendations for Intersections on Access Streets 49 Table 5 Minimum Access Separation for Class U2 and U3 Roads 50 Table 6 Route Numbering Conventions 51 Table 7 Design speeds (km/h) for different road classes 54 Table 8 Typical Road Reserve Widths (m) for Different Road Classes 54 List of Annexures and Additional Tables ITEM Annexure A: Traffic signal co-ordination requirements and leeway Table A1: Classification by Various South African Authorities Table A2: Classification by Various International Authorities Table B: Rural Functional Road Classification Table C: Urban Functional Road Classification Table D: Rural Access Management Requirements and Typical Features Table E: Urban Access Management Requirements and Typical Features Road Classification and Access Management Preface This Manual is the official requirement for the road classification and access management of the South African road network. It provides guidance to National, Provincial and Municipal spheres of government on the functional classification of roads and the methodology according to which such classification must be undertaken. It also gives guidance to how roads must be managed in order to function effectively in accordance with their classification. The document builds and expands on the classification system of the Road Infrastructure Strategic Framework for South Africa (RISFSA) of the South African Department of Transport (DOT, 2006) and supersedes both the draft National Guidelines for Road Access Management in South Africa (COTO, 2005) and the Manual for the Redefinition of the South African Road Network (DOT, 2008). Road authorities in South Africa have an obligation to plan, design, construct and maintain the road network, to protect the public investment in the road infrastructure, to ensure the continued functionality of the transportation system and to promote the safety of traffic on the road network. Authorities also have the obligation to provide a reliable, effective, efficient and integrated transport system that supports the sustainable economic and social development of the country. This Manual provides guidance on the functional classification and access management of roads. It establishes a uniform and integrated classification system for the country, which will underpin and inform the planning, development and management of roads. It includes the following important aspects: • The benefits of functional road classification and access management; • The functional classification system according to which roads
Recommended publications
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual on Uniform Traffic

    Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual on Uniform Traffic

    MManualanual onon UUniformniform TTrafficraffic CControlontrol DDevicesevices forfor StreetsStreets andand HighwaysHighways U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for Streets and Highways Control Devices Manual on Uniform Traffic Dotted line indicates edge of binder spine. MM UU TT CC DD U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration MManualanual onon UUniformniform TTrafficraffic CControlontrol DDevicesevices forfor StreetsStreets andand HighwaysHighways U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 2003 Edition Page i The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is approved by the Federal Highway Administrator as the National Standard in accordance with Title 23 U.S. Code, Sections 109(d), 114(a), 217, 315, and 402(a), 23 CFR 655, and 49 CFR 1.48(b)(8), 1.48(b)(33), and 1.48(c)(2). Addresses for Publications Referenced in the MUTCD American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, DC 20001 www.transportation.org American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) 8201 Corporate Drive, Suite 1125 Landover, MD 20785-2230 www.arema.org Federal Highway Administration Report Center Facsimile number: 301.577.1421 [email protected] Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) 120 Wall Street, Floor 17 New York, NY 10005 www.iesna.org Institute of Makers of Explosives 1120 19th Street, NW, Suite 310 Washington, DC 20036-3605 www.ime.org Institute of Transportation Engineers

  • The Gibraltar Highway Code

    P ! CONTENTS Introduction Rules for pedestrians 3 Rules for users of powered wheelchairs and mobility scooters 10 Rules about animals 12 Rules for cyclists 13 Rules for motorcyclists 17 Rules for drivers and motorcyclists 19 General rules, techniques and advice for all drivers and riders 25 Road users requiring extra care 60 Driving in adverse weather conditions 66 Waiting and parking 70 Motorways 74 Breakdowns and incidents 79 Road works, level crossings and tramways 85 Light signals controlling traffic 92 Signals by authorised persons 93 Signals to other road users 94 Traffic signs 96 Road markings 105 Vehicle markings 109 Annexes 1. You and your bicycle 112 2. Vehicle maintenance and safety 113 3. Vehicle security 116 4. First aid on the road 116 5. Safety code for new drivers 119 1 Introduction This Highway Code applies to Gibraltar. However it also focuses on Traffic Signs and Road Situations outside Gibraltar, that as a driver you will come across most often. The most vulnerable road users are pedestrians, particularly children, older or disabled people, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders. It is important that all road users are aware of The Code and are considerate towards each other. This applies to pedestrians as much as to drivers and riders. Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/ MUST NOT’.
  • American Title a Sociation ~ ~

    American Title a Sociation ~ ~

    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION AMERICAN TITLE A SOCIATION ~ ~ VOUJME XXXVI JUNE, 1957 NUMBER 6 TITLE NEWS Official Publication of THE AMERICAN TITLE ASSOCIATION 3608 Guardian Building-Detroit 26, Michigan Volume XXXVI June, 1957 Number 6 Table of Contents Introduction-The Federal Highway Program ......... ... ................ .. .................... 2 J. E. Sheridan Highway Laws Relating to Controlled Access Roads ..... .. ....... ........... 6 Norman A. Erbe Title Companies and the Expanded Right of Way Problems ...... ............. .. 39 , Daniel W. Rosencrans Arthur A. Anderson Samuel J. Some William A . Thuma INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Program J. E. SHERIDAN We are extremely grateful to Nor­ veloped its planning sufficiently to man A. Erbe, Attorney General of the show to the satisfaction of the dis­ State of Iowa, for permission to re­ trict engineer the effect of the pro­ print his splendid brief embracing posed construction upon adjace.nt the highway laws of various states property, the treatment of access con­ relating to the control in access roads. trol in the area of Federal acquisi­ Mr. Erbe originally presented this m tion, and that appropriate arrange­ narrative form before the convention ments have been made for mainte­ of the Iowa Title Association in May nance and supervision over the land of this year. As is readily ascertain­ to be acquired and held in the name able, this is the result of a compre­ of the United States pending transfer hensive study of various laws touch· of title and jurisdiction to the State ing on the incidents of highway regu­ or the proper subdivision thereof." lations. Additionally, we are privi­ It is suggested that our members leged to carry the panel discussion bring this quoted portion to the at­ of the American Right of Way Asso­ tention of officers of the Highway ciation Convention held in Chicago, Department and the office of its legal May 16 and 17, dealing with "Title division, plus the Office of the Attor­ Companies and the Expanded Right ney General within the members' ju­ of Way Problems".
  • Understanding Intersections –– Stopping at Intersections Are Places Where a Number of Road Users Cross Intersections Paths

    Understanding Intersections –– Stopping at Intersections Are Places Where a Number of Road Users Cross Intersections Paths

    4 rules of the road Chapter 3, signs, signals and road markings, gave you some in this chapter information about the most common signs, signals and road markings you will see when driving. This chapter gives • Understanding you the information you’ll need to help you drive safely at intersections intersections, use lanes correctly and park legally. – signalling – types of intersections Understanding intersections – stopping at Intersections are places where a number of road users cross intersections paths. There is often a lot of activity in intersections, so it’s – right‑of‑way at important to be alert. Remember that other road users may be intersections in a hurry, and may want to move into the same space that you • Using lanes are planning on moving into. correctly – which lane Signalling should you use Signals are important — they let other traffic know what you are – lane tracking intending to do. You should signal when you’re preparing to: – turning lanes – reserved lanes • turn left or right – pulling into a • change lanes lane • park – passing – merging • move toward, or away from, the side of the road. – highway or freeway Types of intersections entrances and exits Controlled intersections – cul‑de‑sacs A controlled intersection is one that has signs or traffic lights – turning around telling you what to do. To drive safely in these intersections, you • Parking tips and need to know what the signals and signs mean, and also the rules right‑of‑way rules. But always be cautious. Other drivers may not be paying attention to the signs and signals. Uncontrolled intersections Uncontrolled intersections have no signs or traffic lights.
  • Roundabouts Applying the 'System'

    Roundabouts Applying the 'System'

    Roundabouts Applying the 'System' to Roundabouts Let us suppose that you are on a dual carriageway approaching a roundabout (400m away). You are currently in the left lane and you intend to turn right at the roundabout. Information: - Take - You see the roundabout and its triangular warning signs in the distance. There are no vehicles between you and the roundabout but you see vehicles on the roundabout. Mirror check. There are two vehicles behind, both in the left lane. - Use - You know that you have to change to the right lane and that you will need to signal to change lane and then to signal continuously on the approach and through the roundabout (the standard Highway Code procedure for turning right at a roundabout)- Give - After checking your mirrors you signal right to the vehicles behind. Position: The right signal remains on for a few seconds and then gradually you move to the right hand lane (Information-Use/Give). When the manoeuver is complete you cancel the signal. After a few more seconds the right signal is re-applied to confirm to the drivers behind that you intend to turn right at the roundabout. Information: The speed and position of the vehicles behind are monitored as you approach the roundabout. An assessment is made of the movement of vehicles on the roundabout and those approaching it from the right and left. You look over the roundabout to see, if possible, vehicles approaching it from the opposite direction (Information-Take). Speed: As you approach the roundabout you begin to brake and lose speed smoothly and progressively (Information-Give).
  • GD 368 Infrastructure Requirements for Emergency Access and Egress from Motorway and All-Purpose Trunk Roads

    GD 368 Infrastructure Requirements for Emergency Access and Egress from Motorway and All-Purpose Trunk Roads

    Design Manual for Roads and Bridges General Principles and Scheme Governance Design GD 368 Infrastructure requirements for emergency access and egress from motorway and all-purpose trunk roads (formerly IAN 68/05) Revision 0 Summary This document contains the infrastructure requirements for emergency access and egress from motorway and all-purpose trunk roads. Application by Overseeing Organisations Any specific requirements for Overseeing Organisations alternative or supplementary to those given in this document are given in National Application Annexes to this document. Feedback and Enquiries Users of this document are encouraged to raise any enquiries and/or provide feedback on the content and usage of this document to the dedicated Highways England team. The email address for all enquiries and feedback is: [email protected] This is a controlled document. GD 368 Revision 0 Contents Contents Release notes 2 Foreword 3 Publishing information ................................................ 3 Contractual and legal considerations ........................................ 3 Introduction 4 Background ...................................................... 4 Assumptions made in the preparation of this document ............................. 4 1. Scope 5 Aspects covered ................................................... 5 Implementation ................................................... 5 Use of GG 101 .................................................... 5 2. Normative references 6 1 GD 368 Revision 0 Release notes Release notes Version Date Details of amendments 0 Mar 2020 GD 368 replaces IAN 68/05. This full document has been re-written to make it compliant with the new Highways England drafting rules. 2 GD 368 Revision 0 Foreword Foreword Publishing information This document is published by Highways England. This document supersedes IAN 68/05, which is withdrawn. Contractual and legal considerations This document forms part of the works specification. It does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract.
  • OCC Legal Statement Changes Post

    OCC Legal Statement Changes Post

    Changes to the Definitive Map & Statement of Public Rights of Way since 21st February 2006 Date Parish/Path Description Width Conditions & Remarks Number Limitations Abingdon Footpath 27 From North Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5029 9893 The Order confirmed Added by Modification Order 07/03/2006 100/27 between property numbers 13 and 15, 7.3.2006 provided a width confirmed 7.3.2006. south-south-westwards for approximately 133 metres 2.5 metres (min) along a strip of Common Land (Registration Number CL153), connecting with the western end of Mandeville Close at Grid Reference SU 5028 9882, to South Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5027 9880. Abingdon Footpath 28 From Colwell Drive at SU 4852 9717 leading generally 2m between SU 4852 1) Northern section added 19/02/2015 100/28 ENE for approx. 54m to SU 4857 9719, then NNW for 9717 and SU 4857 9719. by HA1980 S.38 Agreement approx. 51m and ESE to Willow Brook at SU 4856 9724.] 27.09.2001; came into effect 08.11.2004. 2) Western section added by HA1980 S.38 & 278 Agreement 15.08.2008; came into effect 23.12.2013. Abingdon Footpath 29 From the W end of Caldecott Chase at SU 49017 96473, 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/29 leading N & W for approximately 22 m to Caldecott Road Agreement 05.06.2009; at SU 49007 96486. came into effect 06.01.2014. Abingdon Footpath 30 From Caldecott Chase at SU 49106 96470, leading N & E 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/30 for approximately 26 m to SU 49109 96490.
  • User Manual for the Highways Agency's Routine Maintenance Management System

    User Manual for the Highways Agency's Routine Maintenance Management System

    RMMS MANUAL __________________________________________________ User Manual for the Highways Agency's Routine Maintenance Management System Copies available from:- Highways Agency Operations Support Division St Christopher House Southwark Street LONDON SE1 OTE Tel: 0171-921-3971 Fax: 0171-921-3878 Price £50.00 per copy © Crown Copyright 1996 HIGHWAYS AGENCY RMMS MANUAL CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Part 1: SURVEY 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Network Referencing 1.3 Survey Procedure Part 2: INVENTORY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Surface Options 2.3 Carriageway 2.4 Footways and Cycle Tracks 2.5 Covers, Gratings, Frames and Boxes 2.6 Kerbs, Edgings and Pre-formed Channels 2.7 Highway Drainage 2.8 Communication Installations 2.9 Embankments and Cuttings 2.10 Grassed Areas 2.11 Hedges and Trees 2.12 Sweeping and Cleaning 2.13 Safety Fences and Barriers 2.14 Fences, Walls, Screens and Environmental Barriers 2.15 Road Studs 2.16 Road Markings 2.17 Road Traffic Signs 2.18 Road Traffic Signals 2.19 Road Lighting 2.20 Highway Structures Version 1 Amend.No 0 Issue Date May '96 HIGHWAYS AGENCY RMMS MANUAL CONTENTS (Continued) Part 3: INSPECTION 3.1 Introduction 3.2 RMMS Intervals and Frequencies 3.3 Carriageway 3.4 Footways and Cycle Tracks 3.5 Covers, Gratings, Frames and Boxes 3.6 Kerbs, Edgings and Pre-formed Channels 3.7 Highway Drainage 3.8 Communication Installations 3.9 Embankments and Cuttings 3.10 Grassed Areas 3.11 Hedges and Trees 3.12 Sweeping and Cleaning 3.13 Safety Fences and Barriers 3.14 Fences, Walls, Screens and Environmental Barriers 3.15 Road Studs 3.16
  • Matakana Link Road Public Consultation Feedback

    Matakana Link Road Public Consultation Feedback

    Matakana link road Public Consultation Feedback Report – July 2017 AT.govt.nz Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Development ..................................................................................... 5 1.2 Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 6 2. Feedback Received ..................................................................................................... 8 Question 1 – Which option do you prefer? ................................................................... 9 Question 4 – How would you use the road? .................................................................. 9 Questions 2, 3, 5 & 6 – Issues and Constraints (Key themes identified) ................... 10 3. Next Steps ................................................................................................................. 22 4. Conclusion................................................................................................................. 22 5. Appendix A. Consultation feedback ........................................................................ 23 2 Executive Summary In April 2017, Auckland Transport (AT) sought public feedback on the four short-listed options for the proposed Matakana Link Road. Feedback on the short-listed options was invited from 26 April to 20 May 2017. Submitters were asked to identify their preferred route option (see map
  • Sunshine Coast Transport Analysis Technical Note February 2017

    Sunshine Coast Transport Analysis Technical Note February 2017

    Sunshine Coast Transport Analysis Technical Note February 201 7 Sunshine Coast Regional Council Document information Short title Sunshine Coast Council Transport Network Analysis Checked by: Guy Boughton Version: 2 February 2017 Author: Guy Boughton Created on: 30 June 2016 Last saved: 2 February 2017 Location saved: W:\scc\RSP\TIP\TP_Network_Conf\LGIP\Transport network report Transport Network Analysis Report P a g e | 2 Sunshine Coast Regional Council Contents 1.0 Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 2.0Methodology 6 3.0Trunk Roads 7 4.0Transport Network Vaulation 9 5.0Desired Standard of Service 11 6.0Land Use and Demographics 14 6.1 Demographic Forecasts 14 6.2 Data Sources 14 6.3 Statistical Area Boundaries 19 6.4 Population 20 6.5 Employment 20 6.6 Enrolments 22 7.0Sunshine Coast Integrated Multi-Modal Model (SCIMMM) 23 7.1 Auto (Car) Demand 25 7.2 Spatial Distribution of Trips in Region and Jobs containment 27 7.3 2031 Daily Road Link Flows 27 7.4 Road Network Level of Service 29 7.5 Programmed Upgrades to the State Road Network 29 8.0Other Transport Models 36 9.0Project Prioritisation Model 37 10.0Programmed Upgrades to Council’s Trunk Road Network 38 11.0Conclusion 40 12.0Glossary of Key Terms and Abbreviations 41 12.1 Abbreviations and Acronyms 41 12.2 Key Terms 42 13.0References 43 Transport Network Analysis Report P a g e | 3 Sunshine Coast Regional Council Table Index Table 1 - Value 2016 Transport Network 10 Table 2 - DSS for Sunshine Coast’s Road Network 11 Table 3 - Urban transport corridors standards 12 Table 4 - Rural transport
  • TA 79/99 Amendment No 1 3

    TA 79/99 Amendment No 1 3

    Chapter 3 Volume 5 Section 1 Determination of Urban Road Capacity Part 3 TA 79/99 Amendment No 1 3. DETERMINATION OF URBAN ROAD CAPACITY 3.1 Table 1 sets out the types of Urban Roads and the features that distinguish between them and affect their traffic capacity. Tables 2 & 3 give the flow capacity for each road type described in Table 1. 3.2 Table 4 gives the adjustments when the proportion of heavy vehicles in a one way flow exceeds 15%. A heavy vehicle is defined in this context as OGV1, OGV2 or Buses and Coaches as given in the COBA Manual (DMRB 13.1 Part 4, Chapter 8). 3.3 The flows for road type UM in Table 2 apply to urban motorways where junctions are closely spaced giving weaving lengths of less than 1 kilometre. Urban motorways with layout and junction spacing similar to rural motorways can carry higher flows and TA46/97 “Traffic Flow Ranges for Use in the Assessment of New Rural Roads” will be more applicable. 3.4 Flows for single carriageways are based upon a 60/40 directional split in the flow. The one-way flows shown in Table 2 represent the busiest flow 60% figure. 3.5 The capacities shown apply to gradients of up to 5-6%. Special consideration should be made for steeper gradients, which would reduce capacity. 3.6 On-road parking reduces the effective road width and disrupts flow, e.g. where parking restrictions are not applied on road type UAP2 the flows are likely to be similar to UAP3 where unrestricted parking applies, see Table 1, Similarly effective parking restrictions can lead to higher flows.
  • The A19 Trunk Road

    The A19 Trunk Road

    THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION The A19 Trunk Road The A19 tends to live in the shadow of the more well known A1 it runs more or less parallel with. However, it is no less important to the region, serving the heavy industry and associated ports of Teesside, Wearside and Tyneside. Its journey from a single carriageway road linking coastal towns to modern day dual carriageway has been a painstaking process of over 45 years but has brought both economic and visual transformation to the North East. 1 A Broad History Today the A19 trunk road is a modern all-purpose dual carriageway running from the junction with the A1 at Seaton Burn, north of Newcastle, until it leaves the region south of Middlesbrough. It continues through North Yorkshire to Thirsk and, via a short link (A168), rejoins the A1 at Dishforth. The A19 itself continues as a non-trunk road to Doncaster. In 1952, the A19 was very different. It existed only south of the River Tyne and was a coastal route of single carriageway and relatively poor standard. Starting at South Shields it passed through Whitburn, Sunderland and Seaham, heading inland through Easington and then back out to the coast via Horden and onto Hartlepool. It then snaked its way through Billingham, Stockton, Eaglescliffe and Yarm. The improvements in our region towards the route we know today began at the Tyne Tunnel in 1967/8. The tunnel (£13.4m) was built with approach roads from the A1058 Newcastle to Tynemouth Coast Road (£6.5m) in the north and the A184 Gateshead to Sunderland Trunk Road (£3.5m) in the south.