Japan Law-Policy Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Japan Law-Policy Update JAPAN LAW & POLICY UPDATE 2012 October 1, 2012 In collaboration with AHRN Federation Partners, supported by Open Society Foundation ASIAN HARM REDUCTION NETWORK Japan Law and Policy Update By ASIAN HARM REDUCTION NETWORK & Partners Current situation methamphetamine, are the greatest source of drug use and addiction in the society In comparison with other countries in today. Somewhere between 100,000 and Asia, Japan’s drug problem appears both 2.3 million Japanese use methamphetamines, a broad range www.mofa.go.jp/policy/narcotics/ significantly smaller and very different in ( profile. Historically an isolated island indicating the lack of information on drug nation which never experienced use in Japan due to its strict zero- colonization, it recognized the devastation tolerance approach.1 ) wrought on China by opium and implemented harsh anti-opioid laws very Japan’s approach to drug trafficking and early. Japan has never experienced a consumption has, from its very outset, significant opioid addiction problem. applied a stringent criminalization and punishment approach to even the smallest Harada and Shinkai p. 391, GSHR 2012 Affairs Ministry of Foreign Article 25 Constitution of Japan - p. 431 Recent trends of drug abuse in Japan (Yamamoto) New initiatives for drug abuse treatment in Japanese prisons (Harada Instead, stimulants, most notably and Sinkai) p. 392 1 2 measure0105.html 3 4 5 1 Copyright © 2012 AHRN. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this booklet or portions, thereof in any form. JAPAN LAW & POLICY UPDATE 2012 infractions. Viewed through a rights-based a glut of the product on the market, framework, many of the policies adopted resulted in the country’s first serious by the Japanese government appear challenge with drug abuse and addiction Japan unjustifiably harsh, with no regard for the and led to the introduction of the AHRN rights of the drug user. Stimulants Control Law in 1951. The law has been amended a number of times Law & Policy Update International treaties since, often to increase penalties during Japan has signed and ratified all three UN periods of increased drug use. conventions relating to narcotics and psychotropic substances: The Single The Stimulants Control Law prescribes Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961), the harsh punishments for anyone found either Convention on Psychotropic Substances possessing or consuming banned (1971), and the UN Convention Against stimulants. Both possession and use can Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and result in prison sentences of up to ten Psychotropic Substances (1988).2 years.7 Doctors who dispense banned stimulants to addicted patients under their care for treatment or alleviation face Constitution of Japan 8 The right to health is enshrined in Article similar punishment. While few first-time 25 of the Constitution of Japan, which offenders receive such long sentences, the states that “All people shall have the right length of sentences for use has been to maintain the minimum standards of increasing, with a first-time sentence for 9 wholesome and cultured living. 2) In all consumption averaging roughly two years. spheres of life, the State shall use its endeavors for the promotion and extension Narcotics and Psychotropics of social welfare and security, and of Control Law public health.”3 The Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Law regulates the handling of narcotic Stimulants Control Law drugs and psychotropic substances, Due to the overwhelming use of including opioids, cannabis, and cocaine. stimulants vis-à-vis other narcotics, the The law mandates the reporting of drug Stimulants Control Law regulates the vast abuse. Individuals, including doctors, are majority of drug crimes committed in obligated by law to report people who use Japan. Nearly 90% of drug offenses fall drugs, whose information must be under its regulations.4 One out of eight submitted to the prefectural government arrests is due to a violation of the law.5 and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and During World War II, large amounts of Welfare.10 methamphetamine, known as Philopon, were produced and distributed to soldiers Drug users are further subject to and workers to increase productivity and compulsory hospitalization if considered “inspire the fighting spirits.”6 The social at risk of abuse.11 Drug treatment and de- Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Law, Article 58 Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Law, Article 58-6, Drug abuse and anti-drug policy in Japan p. 514 Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Law, Narc otics and Psychotropics Control Law, Article 58-8 Narc otics and Psychotropics Control Law, Drug abuse and anti-drug policy in Japan (British Journal of Criminology 1995) p. 497 Article 41-1 and 41-2. Stimulants Control Law Article 41-2 Harada and Shinkai p. 392 addiction in Japan is strictly abstinence 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 discord following the war, combined with 2 Copyright © 2012 AHRN. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this booklet or portions, thereof in any form. JAPAN LAW & POLICY UPDATE 2012 based, with a large emphasis on mental Recent developments health. Addiction and compulsory Laws against narcotics use remain strictly hospitalization are based on a mental enforced in Japan, with frequent reports of Japan health evaluation, while mandatory arrests for the possession of relatively hospitalization for drug addiction is AHRN small amounts. An American student further covered under the Mental Hygiene studying abroad in Japan was arrested in 12 Law & Policy Law. Update August 2011 and faced up to 10 years in prison for a box of marijuana-laced cookies sent through the mail by a friend. Cannabis Control Act 17 The Cannabis Control Act regulates the While he ultimately received a cultivation and possession of cannabis and suspended sentence, the media attention associated commodities, such as hemp. and long prison sentence he faced are Consumption of marijuana is proscribed. indicative of the sensationalization around Growing or handling cannabis requires a even minor drug charges in Japan. license from the prefectural governor. Use of marijuana or possession without Drug abuse treatment in necessary licenses is punishable by up to prisons five years in prison.13 Because reporting drug abusers for registration with the government is Opium Law mandatory in Japan, people who use drugs (PWUD) are largely driven underground. The Opium Law regulates cultivation and This, combined with the dearth of drug possession of opium and derivative treatment available, leads to many PWUD products. Any consumption of opioids is having no contact with the healthcare strictly forbidden.14 Use of opioids is system about substance abuse until they punishable with up to seven year’s have come into contact with the criminal imprisonment.15 justice system.18 In 2007, the Japanese prison law was Drug Abuse Prevention amended and expanded to include more Center attention on rehabilitation. Six areas of Established in 1987 by the Japanese programming deemed necessary for better Cabinet, the Drug Abuse Prevention reintegration were identified, including Center is a nonprofit organization drug abuse.19 A pilot program modeled responsible for anti-drug messaging and after the Matrix model in the United States educational initiatives throughout the was introduced in four prisons in 2008.20 country. The organization’s message is While the initiative is a great improvement strictly that of zero-tolerance, with over previous prison programs - which, if advertisements - often featuring prominent available at all, were neither systematic young Japanese entertainment or sports nor evidence-based- all available http://www.dapc.or.jp/english/establish.htm Cannabis Control Law, Article 24-2, 24-3 Cannabis Control Law, Article 9 Opium Law, Article 52-2 Opium Law, http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2012/02/marijuana_tim_wilson_japan_released_cheeba_chews.php Harada and Shinkai p. 395 ibid ibid 399 stars.16 treatments remain abstinence-only. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3 Copyright © 2012 AHRN. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this booklet or portions, thereof in any form. JAPAN LAW & POLICY UPDATE 2012 For any clarification or matters related to harm reduction in Asia contact the following ASIAN HARM REDUCTION NETWORKS FEDERATION Secretariat 405/5 Tha Sala, Mahidol, Muang, ChiangMai, Thailand 50000 Mobile: +66 835776740 Telephone: +66 53 122332 E-mail: [email protected] Our heartfelt gratitude to our partners, colleagues, friends and well wishers from Japan who have contributed their valuable time, and shared priceless thoughts and opinion while developing this document. Our special thanks goes to Prof. Takayuki Harada, Mejiro University; Prof. Hiroshi Tsutomi, University of Shizuoka; Ms. Noriko Ishuzuka; Takeshi Kato and the staffs, PWUD friends from DARC, Kyoto. HARM REDUCTION SAVES LIVES 4 Copyright © 2012 AHRN. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this booklet or portions, thereof in any form..
Recommended publications
  • Illegal Drugs in Canada: Refocusing Canada’S Drug Strategy
    Illegal Drugs in Canada: Refocusing Canada’s Drug Strategy Major Research Paper By: Nicole Barrafato Ottawa University 1 May 2013 Introduction “Billions of dollars have gone into the anti-drug war and it has brought only huge criminal organizations. When you have poured in money for a century surely it is time for you to decide it is not working.” Dr E.K. Rodrigo, former Drug Tsar of Sri Lanka 2005 In the last decade international attitudes towards the prohibition of illegal drugs have undergone rapid change. For over half a century governments around the world have been fighting a declared “war on drugs.” Within the last two decades, however, most have conceded that this crusade has been an unmitigated failure. Even though most of the international community has acknowledged this failure, it has been slow to re-conceptualize how it views illegal drugs and explore alternative policies. Part I of this paper demonstrates that the rapid globalization of the past three decades has had a significant impact on the scope, speed and scale of deviant globalization, where illicit industries operate in the shadows of the legitimate global economy. It was also around this time that the American-led “war on drugs” was launched, which essentially shaped the international drug control regime. Part II addresses the failures of the current prohibition regime and outlines alternative policy approaches that could instead be taken to address the problem of illicit drugs. In addition, case studies on countries that have been at the forefront of innovative drug policies, namely the Netherlands, Portugal and Australia, will also be examined.
    [Show full text]
  • ADHD Parents Medication Guide Revised July 2013
    ADHD Parents Medication Guide Revised July 2013 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Prepared by: American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and American Psychiatric Association Supported by the Elaine Schlosser Lewis Fund Physician: ___________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________ ADHD Parents Medication Guide – July 2013 2 Introduction Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulty paying attention, excessive activity, and impulsivity (acting before you think). ADHD is usually identified when children are in grade school but can be diagnosed at any time from preschool to adulthood. Recent studies indicate that almost 10 percent of children between the ages of 4 to 17 are reported by their parents as being diagnosed with ADHD. So in a classroom of 30 children, two to three children may have ADHD.1,2,3,4,5 Short attention spans and high levels of activity are a normal part of childhood. For children with ADHD, these behaviors are excessive, inappropriate for their age, and interfere with daily functioning at home, school, and with peers. Some children with ADHD only have problems with attention; other children only have issues with hyperactivity and impulsivity; most children with ADHD have problems with all three. As they grow into adolescence and young adulthood, children with ADHD may become less hyperactive yet continue to have significant problems with distraction, disorganization, and poor impulse control. ADHD can interfere with a child’s ability to perform in school, do homework, follow rules, and develop and maintain peer relationships. When children become adolescents, ADHD can increase their risk of dropping out of school or having disciplinary problems.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2014 Medical Marijuana and Your Workforce - Part III Drug Tests, Zero Tolerance Policies and Unemployment Compensation
    LAW OFFICE OF LORI A. GOLDSTEIN, LLC CLIENT BULLETIN August 2014 Medical Marijuana and Your Workforce - Part III Drug Tests, Zero Tolerance Policies and Unemployment Compensation This is the final in a three-part series covering the new Illinois Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act and what it means for employers. Drug Testing Until the Illinois courts provide more guidance, employers should proceed with caution when a registered patient tests positive for marijuana on a pre-employment or employee drug screening. Since cannabis can remain in the body for several weeks, a positive drug test does not necessarily mean that an applicant or employee is impaired at the time of the test. Employers must be careful not to reject a registered patient’s application based solely based on a positive drug test, unless hiring the applicant presents a public safety risk (e.g., security guard or driver positions). Evaluate drug test results for registered patient employees on a case-by-case basis, permitting the employee to explain or contest the basis of a positive test result. Zero Tolerance Policies and Privacy Laws Can employers in states legalizing marijuana include marijuana in zero tolerance drug policies? How are privacy rights affected? Many states, including Illinois, forbid employers from terminating employees for lawful activities conducted during nonworking hours (Illinois Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act.) But if the Illinois courts follow the courts of other states, employers will have more freedom to discipline a registered patient who tests positive for marijuana. The Colorado Supreme Court will soon be considering this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Drug-Free Workplace Policy Acknowledgement Statement for Your Employees to Sign
    DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY 2 DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER: Pinnacol Assurance is providing this resource for informational purposes only. It is not designed for use by any reader, business or enterprise, nor is this intended to be legal advice on what a drug policy should or should not contain. This sample policy is designed to be illustrative of the types of policies used and is written in general terms, without specific consideration given to individual needs or circumstances. Provisions included may not be applicable to the specific reader or business situation, and specific provisions that are applicable may have been omitted from this sample. These materials are not to be used as a substitute for legal or management advice on what is necessary for a valid, binding drug policy. Pinnacol will not be held responsible for any consequences arising out of the use of this sample document, and recommends that before implementing a drug policy advice be obtained from a learned professional knowledgeable in this area. INTRODUCTION 3 At Pinnacol Assurance, we are committed to helping you protect the safety and health of your employees. One way to protect your employees and mitigate risk is by establishing a drug-free workplace policy. This resource was designed to help you design, implement and enforce a drug-free workplace policy. When creating a drug-free workplace policy, consider the following: n What is the purpose of this program and policy? n Who is responsible for enforcing the policy? n Is this a zero-tolerance policy? n How is the policy communicated to your employees? n Who is covered by this policy? n What are the consequences for violating the policy? n What are your employees required to tell you? n Do you offer any type of employee assistance to n Does the policy include drug testing? employees who need help? n Does the policy include searches? Portions of the sample policy contained in this book have been pulled from the elaws section of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Per Se Limits Be Imposed for Cannabis? Equating Cannabinoid Blood Concentrations with Actual Driver Impairment: Practical Limitations and Concerns
    HUMBOLDT JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RELATIONS—ISSUE 35, 2013 Should Per Se Limits Be Imposed For Cannabis? Equating Cannabinoid Blood Concentrations with Actual Driver Impairment: Practical Limitations and Concerns Paul Armentano National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Fourteen US states have amended their longstanding, effect-based DUI drug laws to per se or zero tolerant per se statutes in regard to cannabis. Other states are considering enacting similar legislation. Under these amended traffic safety laws, it is a criminal violation for one to operate a motor vehicle with trace levels of cannabinoids or their metabolites in his or her blood or urine. Opponents of per se cannabinoid limits argue that neither the presence of cannabinoids nor their metabolites are appropriate or consistent predictors of behavioral or psychomotor impairment. They further argue that the imposition of such per se limits may result in the criminal conviction of individuals who may have previously consumed cannabis at some unspecified point in time, but were no longer under its influence. As more states enact statutory changes allowing for the legal use of cannabis under certain circumstances, there is a growing need to re-examine the appropriateness of these proposed per se standards for cannabinoids and their metabolites because the imposition of such limits may, in some instances, inadvertently criminalize behavior that poses no threat to traffic safety,
    [Show full text]
  • Adhd Labeling and Treatment of Children in Japan 1
    CCHR REPORT: ADHD LABELING AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN JAPAN 1 2018 ADHD labeling and treatment of children in Japan CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS JAPAN CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS EUROPE January 2018 CCHR REPORT: ADHD LABELING AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN JAPAN 2 CCHR REPORT: ADHD LABELING AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN JAPAN 3 Introduction Children in Japan are being labeled with the psychiatric diagnosis attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and given psychiatric drugs in order to control the symptoms labeled as ADHD, just as in many European and American countries. The rate of the drugs used are different than those in Europe and the USA which is caused mainly by earlier abuses of psychostimulant drugs causing some of these to be banned and secondly a zero tolerance to drugs use in general (the psychostimulants used in the control of ADHD labeled children are actual drugs with a high abuse potential). Large international pharmaceuticals are increasingly focusing on releasing new types of drugs on the Japanese market that can be prescribed to children labelled with ADHD such as lisdexamfetamine and guanfacine (sold under the name Intuniv). The Japanese market is being described as “the world’s third-biggest market for ADHD treatments” and is growing at more than 20 percent annually.1 Japanese children in early studies were found to be among those less considered fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Yet, marketing efforts and American psychiatrists have promoted the American concept of various behavioural symptoms clustered together and called ADHD, to a degree, that a large number of parents have taken on the concept.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT CHAMBERS, CHERYL. Institutional
    ABSTRACT CHAMBERS, CHERYL. Institutional Racism: Is Law Used as a Tool to Perpetuate Racial Inequality? (Under the direction of Richard Della Fave.) Law is a mechanism we use to instigate social change and bring about equality. It is also the tool that has been used to institutionalize, legitimize and perpetuate inequality. In the past beliefs of racial inferiority and savagery may have resulted in legislation designed to perpetuate a group’s subordinate status. Laws and public policy are created within an historical and political context. Is there a connection between social climate and the advent of federal drug legislation? In this research, conflict and racial inequality perspectives are applied to the role of the economy and politics to foster understanding of opium laws in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 and the contexts from which they emerged. It is hypothesized that an historical analysis of the Congressional discussions surrounding these drug laws will illustrate that competition and threat, economic and/or political, were present prior to the enactment of the laws. Analyses indicate that while economic and to a limited extent political competition between Chinese immigrants and white Americans affected the passage of the opium laws, economic and political competition had little effect on the passage of the Marihuana Tax Act or the Anti-Drug Abuse Act. While vilification of and anti-minority sentiment during the opium legislation was clear and recognizable, it was almost non-existent during the marijuana legislation, and present in only nuances in the 1980’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage Drinking and Driving
    State of Illinois For more information, Illinois State Police or to request a safety ZERO TOLERANCE LAW presentation, you for Underage Drinking may send an email to the Teenage and Driving ISP Safety Zero Tolerance is a state law that went into effect on Education Unit at: Drinking and January 1, 1995, and provides for the suspension of driving privileges of any person under the age of 21 Safety_Education@isp. who drives after consuming alcohol. As the name Driving Zero Tolerance suggests, any trace of alcohol in a state.il.us young person’s system can result in a suspended or call 217/782-6637 driver’s license. Possession or Consumption You can also visit us on of Alcoholic Beverages the web at: It is illegal for any person under the age of 21 to www.state.il.us/safety/ consume or possess, whether opened or unopened, alcoholic beverages. Penalties include: eduprogs.cfm • Driving privileges suspended for 6 months for a first conviction. • Driving privileges suspended for 12 months for a second conviction. • A maximum $2,500 fine and up to one year in jail. Improper Use of Illinois Driver’s License or ID Card You could spend up to three years in prison, face fines of up to $25,000, and have your driver’s license suspended if you: • Allow another to use your driver’s license or ID Card. • Use someone else’s driver’s license or ID Card to represent yourself. Printed by the Authority of the State of Illinois ISP Central Printing Section • Knowingly possess a fictitious or unlawfully altered Illinois State Police driver’s license or ID Card.
    [Show full text]
  • CICAD/Doc.2147/14 Guatemala 18 November 2014 Original: English
    INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION C I C A D Secretariat for Multidimensional Security FIFTY-SIXTH REGULAR SESSION OEA/Ser.L/XIV.2.56 November 19 - 21, 2014 CICAD/doc.2147/14 Guatemala 18 November 2014 Original: English THE REFORM OF CANNABIS LAWS IN JAMAICA MAURICE BAILEY, JAMAICA The Reform of Cannabis Laws in Jamaica The Jamaican Context • Cannabis Sativa (marijuana) is known as “ganja” in Jamaica. • Ganja was bought to Jamaica in the mid 19th century by imported labourers from India • Ganja use is widespread in Jamaica for recreational, religious and medicinal purposes. Brief History of Ganja Laws In Jamaica • Hague Convention 1912-contracting parties make possession of opium, morphine and cocaine a criminal offence. • Cannabis was not included in Convention • Jamaican Legislators passed Opium Law 1913 and included cannabis “ganja” • Issues of race and class prejudice The Dangerous Drugs Act 1948 • Prohibition of ganja now contained in the Dangerous Drugs Act. Passed in 1948 and amended several times since then • Absolute prohibition of any dealing with the ganja plant • Penalties were severe: between 1941 and 1972 a sentence of imprisonment of up to a maximum of 18 months was mandatory on conviction for possession • Section 2 defines “ganja” as follows; "ganja" includes all parts of the plant known as cannabis sativa from which the resin has not been extracted and includes any resin obtained from that plant, but does not include medicinal preparations made from that plant • Part IIIA (Sections 7A-7D) contain specific provisions for Ganja • Section 7A prohibits import or export or taking any steps preparatory to export.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan 2020 Crime & Safety Report
    Japan 2020 Crime & Safety Report This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo. OSAC encourages travelers to use this report to gain baseline knowledge of security conditions in Japan. For more in-depth information, review OSAC’s Japan country page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Japan at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution due to due to an outbreak of COVID-19. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Japan’s Travel Advisory was assessed as a Level 1. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. Overall Crime and Safety Situation Crime Threats The U.S. Department of State has assessed all cities with U.S. diplomatic posts in Japan as being LOW- threat locations for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. The crime rate in Japan is generally well below the U.S. national average. Crimes targeting foreigners are seldom, especially as Tokyo has touted itself as “the world’s safest big city” in preparation for the now-postponed 2020 Olympic Games. The Economist Intelligence Unit ranked Tokyo and Osaka as the world’s number one and number three safest cities for 2019. Pickpocketing and other petty crimes do sometimes take place in crowded shopping areas, bars and nightclubs, and public transportation hubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Marijuana: the Impact on the Workplace
    9/1/2020 MEDICAL MARIJUANA: THE IMPACT ON THE WORKPLACE John A. McCreary Charlotte Katzenmoyer Adam L. Santucci Babst Calland Executive Director McNees Wallace & Nurick Phone: (412)394.5400 Capital Region Water Phone: (717)237.5388 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.McNeesLaw.com OVERVIEW • The federal landscape • How the PA Medical Marijuana Law Works • Employment aspects of PA Medical Marijuana Law • What have the courts said (so far) www.McNeesLaw.com 1 9/1/2020 THE FEDERAL LANDSCAPE Marijuana ‐ Status Across the U.S. • Legal for recreational use –11 states plus DC • Legal for medical use –33 states plus DC • Low THC/High CBD laws –14 states • Federal Law • Controlled Substances Act (CSA) – Schedule I drug • DOJ Memo • Rohrabacher‐Farr/Blumenauer amendment • Farm Bill – legalization of hemp www.McNeesLaw.com THE FEDERAL LANDSCAPE Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 • Applies to Federal contractors and grantees • Requires covered organizations to provide a “drug‐free workplace” by: • Publishing a policy statement • Establishing an awareness program • Notifying employees of their obligations • Notifying the granting agency of any violations • Imposing penalties • Standard – “good faith effort to maintain a drug‐free workplace.” • Penalties for lack of compliance –payments and/or grant may be suspended/terminated www.McNeesLaw.com 2 9/1/2020 MEDICAL MARIJUANA & DRUG TESTING Does Legalization Affect Drug Testing? • Testing generally governed by federal law • DOT Regulations •
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Strategies for Promoting the Safe Use of Prescription Opioids and the Potential Impact of Overregulation
    REGULATORY STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING THE SAFE USE OF PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF OVERREGULATION Wissenschaftliche Prüfungsarbeit zur Erlangung des Titels „Master of Drug Regulatory Affairs“ der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Dr. Katja Bendrin aus Torgau Bonn 2020 Betreuer und Erster Referent: Dr. Birka Lehmann Zweiter Referent: Dr. Jan Heun REGULATORY STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING THE SAFE USE OF PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF OVERREGULATION Acknowledgment │ page II of VII Acknowledgment I want to thank Dr. Birka Lehmann for her willingness to supervise this work and for her support. I further thank Dr. Jan Heun for assuming the role of the second reviewer. A big thank you to the DGRA Team for the organization of the master's course and especially to Dr. Jasmin Fahnenstich for her support to find the thesis topic and supervisors. Furthermore, thank you Harald for your patient support. REGULATORY STRATEGIES FOR PROMOTING THE SAFE USE OF PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF OVERREGULATION Table of Contents │ page III of VII Table of Contents 1. Scope.................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Classification of Opioid Medicines .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]