DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Analysis of Media Freedom and Pluralism in the EU Member States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Analysis of Media Freedom and Pluralism in the EU Member States DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS A comparative analysis of media freedom and pluralism in the EU Member States STUDY Abstract This study was commissioned by the European Parliament's Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee. The authors argue that democratic processes in several EU countries are suffering from systemic failure, with the result that the basic conditions of media pluralism are not present, and, at the same time, that the distortion in media pluralism is hampering the proper functioning of democracy. The study offers a new approach to strengthening media freedom and pluralism, bearing in mind the different political and social systems of the Member States. The authors propose concrete, enforceable and systematic actions to correct the deficiencies found. PE 571.376 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) and commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy Departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and external, to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Research Administrator Responsible Sarah SY Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] AUTHOR(S) Petra BÁRD, Visiting Professor, Legal Studies Department, Central European University (CEU), Budapest, Hungary Judit BAYER, Professor, Law School, Department for Media and Information Law, University of Miskolc, Hungary Sergio CARRERA, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels, Belgium NATIONAL EXPERTS BULGARIA: Alexander KASHUMOV, Attorney-at-law, Head of Legal Team of the non- governmental organization “Access to Information Programme”, Bulgaria FRANCE: Raymond KUHN, Professor, School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom GREECE: Petros IOSIFIDIS, Professor in Media Policy, City University London, United Kingdom HUNGARY: Judit BAYER, Professor, Law School, Department for Media and Information Law, University of Miskolc, Hungary ITALY: Serena SILEONI, Research Fellow in constitutional law, Department of Law, University of Milano-Bicocca; Italy; Giulio Enea VIGEVANI, Professor of constitutional law and media law, Department of Law, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy POLAND: Dominika BYCHAWSKA-SINIARSKA, Director of the Observatory of Media Freedom in Poland of the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights; Prof. Ireneusz C. KAMIŃSKI, Jagielonian University, Polish Academy of Science, an expert at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights ROMANIA: Manuela PREOTEASA, PhD Lecturer, FJSC, University of Bucharest, Romania; Andrei Schwartz, unaffiliated researcher LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in September 2016. © European Union, 2016 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6 LIST OF TABLES 7 LIST OF FIGURES 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 1. Introduction 11 1.1. Background 11 1.2. Methodology 11 1.3. The role of digitalisation in the pluralism problem 13 1.4. Competences 14 1.5. Recommendations 14 2. Methodology 17 2.1. Defining the research question 17 2.2. Selection of countries 20 2.3. The questionnaire 22 2.4. Policy recommendations 23 3. State of the Art 25 3.1. The EU’s previous policy actions regarding media pluralism 25 3.2. The reasons behind the lack of a coordinated EU policy action 31 3.2.1. Conflicting interests 31 3.2.2. Divergent Scholarly Opinions 32 3.2.3. A moving target 32 3.3. The new quality of the pluralism problem 33 4. The concept and key elements of media freedom and pluralism 34 4.1. Freedom of expression and pluralism 35 4.2. Diversity in ownership 36 4.3. Funding 38 4.4. Online pluralism: Content offered vs. content accessed 40 4.5. Journalistic ethics, media literacy and protection of sources 42 5. European competences in freedom and pluralism of the media 44 5.1. Democracy 45 5.1.1. Existing instruments 46 5.1.2. Future possibilities to enforce EU values 48 4 A comparative analysis of media freedom and pluralism in the EU Member States __________________________________________________________________________________________ 5.2. Fundamental rights 49 5.3. Union citizenship 51 5.4. Free movement 52 5.5. Competition law 52 6. Summary of country studies 53 6.1. Classic pluralism issues 54 6.2. Impact of soft law and EU legal instruments 58 6.3. Internet concentration 58 6.4. Public-service media 60 7. Conclusions and recommendations 61 7.1. Conclusions 61 7.1.1. Key conclusions on the status of freedom and pluralism in the media 61 7.1.2. Conclusions on the findings 62 7.1.3. Feasibility 62 7.2. Reasoning of the recommended actions 63 7.3. Final remarks 66 7.4. Recommendations 67 7.5. Recommendations on legislative actions 69 7.5.1. Monitoring and Commission action on media pluralism 69 7.5.2. Legislation should be developed on state aid and subsidies granted to media outlets 70 7.5.3. Legal requirement to realise the conditions of media pluralism and freedom 72 7.5.4. Transparency database 74 7.5.5. Clarification of the rights and obligations of internet service providers 75 7.6. Educational projects 77 7.7. Follow-up and further research 78 REFERENCES 79 Media Pluralism in Bulgaria 88 Media Pluralism in France 99 Media Pluralism in Greece 111 Media Pluralism in Hungary 120 Media Pluralism in Italy 140 Media Pluralism in Poland 155 Media Pluralism in Romania 173 5 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AVMSD Audiovisual Media Services Directive CJ Court of Justice CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CMPF Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom CMP Media Pluralism Monitor ECHR European Convention on Human Rights or Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ECD Directive on Electronic Commerce ECtHR European Court of Human Rights ECI European Citizens Initiative ECJ European Court of Justice ECPMF European Centre for Press and Media Freedom EPRA European Platform of Regulatory Authorities EU European Union FRA Fundamental Rights Agency ISP Internet Service Provider MEP Member of the European Parliament MP Member of Parliament MPM Media Pluralism Monitor MS Member State NRA National Regulatory Authority TEU Treaty on the European Union TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union UGC User-Generated Content 6 A comparative analysis of media freedom and pluralism in the EU Member States __________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Level of risk to pluralism in the political and the market domain in European MSs .......................................................................................... 21 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Stages of the recommended monitoring process .......................................... 69 Figure 2: Simplified scheme of the notice-and-notice system ...................................... 76 7 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Policy-makers have expressed concern for several decades now over the progressive curtailment of media freedom and pluralism in several Member States (MSs) of the European Union, but they have not been able to reach a consensus on precisely what actions to take. Recent political events – namely the systematic deterioration of the level of democracy in some Member States1 and the rise of political extremism, nationalism and populism throughout the EU – have prompted fears that these processes will spread virally and have sent a strong signal that supranational action is needed in order to improve the state of freedom and pluralism of the media. The Charter on Fundamental Rights of the EU explicitly calls for respect of media freedom and pluralism, among other fundamental rights. The Charter is directly applicable in cases where the Member State acts in the scope of EU law.2 MSs' obligation to ensure pluralism includes 1) refraining from interference that would distort the market and 2) ensuring that a plurality of opinions is present in the media market by enacting the necessary legislation. Research on media freedom and pluralism has traditionally focused on the growing power of transnational media companies, which tend to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Media Pluralism Monitor: Conceptualizing Media Pluralism for the Online Environment Elda Brogi
    The Media pluralism monitor: Conceptualizing media pluralism for the online environment Elda Brogi How to cite this article: Brogi, Elda (2020). “The media pluralism monitor: Conceptualizing media pluralism for the online environment”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 5, e290529. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.29 Invited manuscript received on 18th October 2020 Elda Brogi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-0528 Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom European University Institute Via Boccaccio, 121/111 50133 Florence, Italy [email protected] Abstract Media pluralism is an essential feature and pillar of contemporary democracies. It is a corollary of the right to freedom of expression, as guaranteed by European national constitutions, as well as by theConvention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (art. 10) and by the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union (art. 11). Ensuring a plural media environment is a precondition for democracy and may be seen as a policy goal. The availability and accessibility of diverse information and views create the conditions for citizens to form and express their opinions and participate in the democratic debate in an informed way. Due to technological developments and the rapid rise of digital platforms intermediating online content, the concept of media pluralism has been reinterpreted at both academic and policy level, taking into account the recent structural changes in the media sector. The Media pluralism monitor is a methodology to assess the risks to media pluralism, based on a set of 20 indicators covering a broad definition of media pluralism and, therefore, having a holistic perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • PORTO, PORTUGAL June 21St to 23Rd, 2001
    CIRCOM REGIONAL CONFERENCE REPORT PORTO, PORTUGAL June 21st to 23rd, 2001 PRIX CIRCOM REGIONAL 2001 Copro workshops CR Conference 2001 Report on the Television Journalism Workshop file:///D|/CIRCOM/WWW/2001/1.html (1 of 2) [25.3.2003 10:48:45] CIRCOM REGIONAL This year's Annual Conference of Circom Regional was hosted by RTP, the Portuguese national broadcaster, in Porto, the 2001 European capital of culture. The city presented itself to the more than 250 participants from all over Europe at its best, providing them excellent facilities for their work and sessions, as well as cultural top-events, food and wine worth to be remembered, spotless sunshine,… The RTP staff excelled as a brilliantly efficient, as well as polite and hospitable team. file:///D|/CIRCOM/WWW/2001/1.html (2 of 2) [25.3.2003 10:48:45] CIRCOM regional . PORTO 2001 CONFERENCE REPORT Thursday, June 21, 2001 9.30 - 10.30 OPENING CEREMONY Responsible: Djalme Neves, RTP, CR Vice-President, Portugal Speakers: Lefty Kongalides, CR President, Greece Nuno Cardoso, Mayor of Porto, Portugal Dr. Pacheco Pereira, Vice-President of the European Parliament Dr. Teresa Lago, Chair of Porto 2001 - European Capital of Culture Dr. Joao Carlos Silva, President of RTP, Portugal Mr. Djalme Neves and Dr. Joao Carlos Silva initially warmly welcomed all participants and Mr. Silva shortly presented RTP, the Portuguese public service broadcaster and its activities. Mr. Nuno Cardoso, Mayor of Porto described Porto as a liberal city with a dynamic television scene. He also stated that regional television has an important role in the future of the audio- visual industry.
    [Show full text]
  • An N U Al R Ep O R T 2018 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT The Annual Report in English is a translation of the French Document de référence provided for information purposes. This translation is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Document de référence. The Annual Report is available on the Company’s website www.vivendi.com II –— VIVENDI –— ANNUAL REPORT 2018 –— –— VIVENDI –— ANNUAL REPORT 2018 –— 01 Content QUESTIONS FOR YANNICK BOLLORÉ AND ARNAUD DE PUYFONTAINE 02 PROFILE OF THE GROUP — STRATEGY AND VALUE CREATION — BUSINESSES, FINANCIAL COMMUNICATION, TAX POLICY AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT — NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 04 1. Profile of the Group 06 1 2. Strategy and Value Creation 12 3. Businesses – Financial Communication – Tax Policy and Regulatory Environment 24 4. Non-financial Performance 48 RISK FACTORS — INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT — COMPLIANCE POLICY 96 1. Risk Factors 98 2. Internal Control and Risk Management 102 2 3. Compliance Policy 108 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF VIVENDI — COMPENSATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS OF VIVENDI — GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY 112 1. Corporate Governance of Vivendi 114 2. Compensation of Corporate Officers of Vivendi 150 3 3. General Information about the Company 184 FINANCIAL REPORT — STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 196 Key Consolidated Financial Data for the last five years 198 4 I – 2018 Financial Report 199 II – Appendix to the Financial Report 222 III – Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 223 IV – 2018 Statutory Financial Statements 319 RECENT EVENTS — OUTLOOK 358 1. Recent Events 360 5 2. Outlook 361 RESPONSIBILITY FOR AUDITING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 362 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Facts: Free from Fear Or Favour
    Reporting Facts: Free from Fear or Favour PREVIEW OF IN FOCUS REPORT ON WORLD TRENDS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN SOCIETIES. They make a vital contribution to achieving sustainable development – including, topically, Sustainable Development Goal 3 that calls for healthy lives and promoting well-being for all. In the context of COVID-19, this is more important than ever. Journalists need editorial independence in order to be professional, ethical and serve the public interest. But today, journalism is under increased threat as a result of public and private sector influence that endangers editorial independence. All over the world, journalists are struggling to stave off pressures and attacks from both external actors and decision-making systems or individuals in their own outlets. By far, the greatest menace to editorial independence in a growing number of countries across the world is media capture, a form of media control that is achieved through systematic steps by governments and powerful interest groups. This capture is through taking over and abusing: • regulatory mechanisms governing the media, • state-owned or state-controlled media operations, • public funds used to finance journalism, and • ownership of privately held news outlets. Such overpowering control of media leads to a shrinking of journalistic autonomy and contaminates the integrity of the news that is available to the public. However, there is push-back, and even more can be done to support editorial independence
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Auditors' Report
    Profile 2 INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY Message from the Chairman and Chief Executive 3 6 AND ITS CAPITAL 215 6.1 Information about TF1 216 PRESENTATION 6.2 Legal environment 226 1 OF THE TF1 GROUP 5 6.3 Capital 228 1.1 The management team 6 6.4 Ownership structure 235 1.2 Simplified diagram of the group’s businesses 6.5 Stock market information 238 at 18/02/2014 7 1.3 Group activities 8 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 241 1.4 TF1 group history and 2013 key events 14 7 Foreword 242 1.5 Group indicators 19 7.1 Social information 245 1.6 Research and Development expenditure 23 7.2 Environmental information 258 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.3 Societal information 266 REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN 2 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 25 GENERAL MEETING 281 2.1 Composition of the Board of Directors and Board 8 Committees 26 8.1 Taking part in the Combined General Meeting of April 17, 2014 282 2.2 Chairman’s report 39 8.2 Agenda 285 2.3 Report on remuneration 62 8.3 Report of the board of Directors 2.4 Risk factors 70 on the resolutions and statement of the reasons for the resolutions 286 MANAGEMENT REPORT 8.4 Presentation of the draft resolutions 294 3 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 79 3.1 2013 Market trends 81 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 299 3.2 2013 Activity and results 93 9 9.1 Person responsible for the registration 3.3 Available information in other part of the document and information concerning registration document 107 the verification of the accounts 300 3.4 Statement of company operations 9.2 Relations with shareholders 302 over the last five business years 108 9.3
    [Show full text]
  • Press Freedom in the International Human Rights Discourse Wiebke Lamer Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Graduate Program in International Studies Theses & Graduate Program in International Studies Dissertations Spring 2014 Neglecting the 'Right on Which All Other Rights Depend': Press Freedom in the International Human Rights Discourse Wiebke Lamer Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gpis_etds Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Lamer, Wiebke. "Neglecting the 'Right on Which All Other Rights Depend': Press Freedom in the International Human Rights Discourse" (2014). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, International Studies, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/j40y- n533 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gpis_etds/74 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Program in International Studies at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Program in International Studies Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEGLECTING THE ‘RIGHT ON WHICH ALL OTHER RIGHTS DEPEND’: PRESS FREEDOM IN THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE by Wiebke Lamer B.A. June 2003, De Montfort University, UK M. A. September 2004, University of Leicester, UK M.Sc. September 2008, School of Advanced Study, University of London, UK A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2014 Approvedby: Kuri Taylor G^rhbatz (Director) tman (Member) Laura Roselle (Member) ABSTRACT NEGLECTING THE ‘RIGHT ON WHICH ALL OTHER RIGHTS DEPEND’: PRESS FREEDOM IN THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE Wiebke Lamer Old Dominion University, 2014 Director: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Men in the News
    Nordic Council of Ministers TemaNord 2017:527 Women and men in the news and men in Women 2017:527 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org WOMEN AND MEN IN THE NEWS The media carry significant notions of social and cultural norms and values and have a powerful role in constructing and reinforcing gendered images. The news WOMEN AND MEN in particular has an important role in how notions of power are distributed in the society. This report presents study findings on how women and men are represented in the news in the Nordic countries, and to what extent women and IN THE NEWS men occupy the decision-making positions in the media. The survey is based on the recent findings from three cross-national research projects. These findings REPORT ON GENDER REPRESENTATION IN NORDIC NEWS CONTENT are supported by national studies. The results indicate that in all the Nordic AND THE NORDIC MEDIA INDUSTRY countries women are underrepresented in the news media both as news subjects and as sources of information. Men also dominate in higher-level decision-making positions. The report includes examples of measures used to improve the gender balance in Nordic news. Women and men in the news Report on gender representation in Nordic news content and the Nordic media industry Saga Mannila TemaNord 2017:527 Women and men in the news Report on gender representation in Nordic news content and the Nordic media industry Saga Mannila ISBN 978-92-893-4973-4 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4974-1 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4975-8 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2017-527 TemaNord 2017:527 ISSN 0908-6692 Standard: PDF/UA-1 ISO 14289-1 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2017 Layout: NMR Print: Rosendahls Printed in Denmark Although the Nordic Council of Ministers funded this publication, the contents do not necessarily reflect its views, policies or recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Composition of Contentious Politics in the Visegrad Countries
    At the Parliament or in the Streets? Issue Composition of Contentious Politics in the Visegrad Countries Work in progress; please contact us for the most recent version of the manuscript. Ondrej Cisar and Katerina Vrablikova [email protected] [email protected] Paper prepared for the ECPR General Conference, Université de Montréal 26 - 29 August 2015 (Panel: Party-Movements Interactions and the Policy Process: Beyond the Movements vs. Parties Dichotomy) Introduction In the last decades protest has rapidly grown and “normalized” as a standard component of conventional politics (Norris et al. 2006, Norris 2002, Meyer and Tarrow 1998, Teorell et al. 2007). In addition to political parties contentious/movement politics is one of the most important political forces in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, we have thus far learned rather little about the interaction between parties and protest politics as the two fields have been mostly studied separately (McAdam and Tarrow 2013). There is a complete lack of such research in post-communist countries. While researchers have focused on the 1989 big protest events that accompanied the initial phase of democratization and a short period after that (see Glenn 2001, 2003, Ekiert and Kubik 2001, della Porta 2014), the research on political conflict in this region has solely been party-centered and mostly disregarded the role played by contentious politics. The goal of this paper is to examine interaction dynamics between party and protest politics in four post-communist democracies – the Visegrad countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia) – as they provide the study with a great variation in the issue configuration of their political space.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Tavole Statistiche Fuori Testo
    Tavole statistiche Elenco delle tavole statistiche fuori testo Tirature e vendite complessive dei giornali quotidiani per area di diffusione e per categoria (2003-2004-2005) Provinciali ....................................................................................................................................................... Tavola I Regionali .......................................................................................................................................................... Tavola II Pluriregionali ............................................................................................................................................... Tavola III Nazionali .......................................................................................................................................................... Tavola IV Economici ....................................................................................................................................................... Tavola V Sportivi .............................................................................................................................................................. Tavola VI Politici ................................................................................................................................................................. Tavola VII Altri ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Disinformation on Democratic Processes and Human Rights in the World
    STUDY Requested by the DROI subcommittee The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world @Adobe Stock Authors: Carme COLOMINA, Héctor SÁNCHEZ MARGALEF, Richard YOUNGS European Parliament coordinator: Policy Department for External Relations EN Directorate General for External Policies of the Union PE 653.635 - April 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world ABSTRACT Around the world, disinformation is spreading and becoming a more complex phenomenon based on emerging techniques of deception. Disinformation undermines human rights and many elements of good quality democracy; but counter-disinformation measures can also have a prejudicial impact on human rights and democracy. COVID-19 compounds both these dynamics and has unleashed more intense waves of disinformation, allied to human rights and democracy setbacks. Effective responses to disinformation are needed at multiple levels, including formal laws and regulations, corporate measures and civil society action. While the EU has begun to tackle disinformation in its external actions, it has scope to place greater stress on the human rights dimension of this challenge. In doing so, the EU can draw upon best practice examples from around the world that tackle disinformation through a human rights lens. This study proposes steps the EU can take to build counter-disinformation more seamlessly into its global human rights and democracy policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario of the Exhibition: Tomasz Łabuszewski, Phd, in Cooperation with Anna Maria Adamus, Phd, Ewa Dyngosz, Edyta Gula and Michał Zarychta
    STOLEN CHILDHOOD Scenario of the exhibition: Tomasz Łabuszewski, PhD, in cooperation with Anna Maria Adamus, PhD, Ewa Dyngosz, Edyta Gula and Michał Zarychta Graphic design: Katarzyna Dinwebel Reviewers: Bartosz Kuświk, PhD Waldemar Brenda, PhD Producer: Pracownia Plastyczna Andrzej Dąbrowski Photographs from the following archives: AKG images, Archive of the Institute of National Remembrance, Municipal Archive in Dzerzhinsk, State Archive in Warsaw, Archive of Polish Armenians, BE&W Foto, National Library, Bundesarchiv, Centre for Documentation of Deportations, Exile and Resettlements in Cracow, Foundation for Polish-German Reconciliation, Getty Images, Museum of the Second World War, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Polish Army Museum in Kołobrzeg, Warsaw Rising Museum, Regional Museum in Jarocin, Museum of the Castle of Górka Family in Szamotuły, National Digital Archive, Ośrodek Karta, Polish Photographers’ Agency Forum, Polish Press Agency, Underground Poland Studio, Documentary and Feature Film Studio, Association of Crimean Karaites in Poland. With special thanks to: Bogdan Bednarczyk, Janusz Bogdanowicz, Alina Głowacka-Szłapowa, Tomasz Karasiński, Kazimierz Krajewski, PhD, Ewa Siemaszko and Leszek Żebrowski, as well as the Institute of National Remembrance branch offices in Łódź and Poznań. Photograph on the front panel: Archives of the Institute of National Remembrance Despite their efforts, the authors of the exhibition did not manage to reach all authors of photographs used in the exhibition or holders of proprietary
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]