DOCSLIB.ORG

The Good Governance Agenda for Decentralization in Uttarakhand, India: Implications for Social Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Good Governance Agenda for Decentralization in Uttarakhand, India: Implications for Social Justice The good governance agenda for decentralization in Uttarakhand, India: implications for social justice By NICOLA GIORDANO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Arts degree in International Development Studies Saint Mary’s University April, 2010, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright © Nicola Giordano, 2010 Thesis approved by Supervisor Dr. Ryan Isakson First Reader Dr. Joe Tharamangalam Second Reader Dr. Jun Borras Date: April 22nd, 2010 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................9 Tables and Figures...................................................................................................................10 Abstract....................................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER I............................................................................................................................15 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................15 CHAPTER II ..........................................................................................................................15 2.1 Decentralization, the state and social justice: outcome for development .....................22 2.2 Good Governance: the Neoliberal Perspective ............................................................29 2.3 The good governance approach to decentralization: public good and efficiency. .......32 2.4 Critiques of Good Governance: implications for devolution and democracy..............36 2.5 Good Governance and social justice: An oppressive “civilizing” mission? ..................38 2.6 Social justice according to different theoretical frameworks.........................................43 2.7 Decentralization and Social Justice ...............................................................................47 2.8 The political ideology of the state: implications for decentralization ...........................50 2.9 Good governance decentralization forms and definitions ............................................53 2.10 The Centre-Local dimension in implementing the good governance approach to decentralization....................................................................................................................56 2.11 Decentralization initial enthusiasm during the Structural Adjustment Programs.......58 2 2.12 What did not work in good governance decentralization?.........................................61 2.13 Decentralization and its current inherent central paradox of democratization versus nation-driven neoliberal policies .........................................................................................64 2.14 Institutional Political Economy (IPE): from neoliberal techno-manegerialism to political economic populism in decentralization ..............................................................................67 2.15 Sustainable livelihoods approach and decentralization as political capital .................70 2.16 Neo-Marxists and decentralization as policy device to reproduce forces of capitalism73 2.17 Decentralization and social justice in India.................................................................78 2.18 Where is this research standing?.................................................................................79 CHAPTER III.........................................................................................................................81 3.1 From theory to binding legal reality: The Constitutional definition of social justice in India .............................................................................................................................................81 3.2 Village decentralization under the Panchayati Raj Act..................................................85 3.3 The organization of Panchayat Raj................................................................................87 3.4 Panchayati Raj: funding limited social justice................................................................90 3.5 Tensions, struggles and challenges for Panchayati Raj in India....................................94 3.6 An introduction to Forest Management in India ..........................................................98 3.7 Legal framework and guidelines of Joint Forest Management .....................................99 3.8 Tensions and livelihoods implications for National Forest Management ..................103 3.9 Introducing Uttarakhand: from self-reliance to oppression........................................106 3 3.10 Panchayati Raj in Uttarakhand: Functions, Funding and Structure..........................109 3.11 Early Panchayati Raj in Uttarakhand: potential and struggles...................................111 3.12 Genesis of forest policy in Uttarakhand: from struggles against the British rule to rhetoric of environmental conservation ..........................................................................................114 3.13 From owners to managers: Van Panchayat legal changes and market pressures .....118 3.14 Today’s neoliberal discourse in conceptualizing Van Panchayat..............................121 3.15 Where in Uttarakhand? Munsiari area: a brief introduction....................................124 CHAPTER IV.......................................................................................................................126 4.1 The central problematic ..............................................................................................126 4.2 Causal variables ...........................................................................................................127 4.3 Chain of Causality........................................................................................................128 4.4 Methodology................................................................................................................137 4.4.1 Significance levels for variables ............................................................................142 4.4.2 Sample..................................................................................................................143 4.5 Household Poverty Index ...........................................................................................147 4.6 First Hypothesis: Access to forest resources in decentralized forest management.....148 4.6.1 First level of analysis.............................................................................................149 4.6.2 Results first level of analysis..................................................................................151 4.6.3 Second level analysis ............................................................................................160 4 4.6.4 Results second level of analysis ............................................................................162 4.6.5 Third level of analysis...........................................................................................167 4.6.6 Results third level of analysis................................................................................168 4.6.7 Conclusions for Hypothesis One.........................................................................175 4.7 Second Hypothesis: Engagement in Institutional Processes.......................................177 4.7.1 First level of analysis.............................................................................................179 4.7.2 Results first level of analysis..................................................................................182 4.7.3 Second level of analysis ........................................................................................187 4.7.4 Results second level of analysis ............................................................................187 4.7.5 Third level of analysis...........................................................................................199 4.7.6 Results third level of analysis................................................................................200 4.7.7 Conclusion Second Hypothesis ...........................................................................201 4.8 Third Hypothesis: Marketization Pressures................................................................203 4.8.1 First level of analysis.............................................................................................204 4.8.2 Results of first level of analysis .............................................................................206 4.8.3 Second level of analysis ........................................................................................218 4.8.4 Results second level of analysis ............................................................................220 4.8.5 Conclusion of the third hypothesis ......................................................................231 4.9 Fourth Hypothesis: Decentralization and Pressures for Market Development .........233 4.9.1 First level of analysis.............................................................................................234 5 4.9.2 Results first level of analysis..................................................................................234 4.9.3 Second Level of analysis.......................................................................................243 4.9.4 Results second
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law Legislative Department Code Section.Pdf
    GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR LAW (LEGISLATIVE) DEPARTMENT [COPE SEOTIONf Bihar Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act. 1961 [BIHAR ACT VI OF 1962] modified upto the 20th June, 1970] NIEPA G0262 PRINTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT SECRETARIAT PRESS. BIHAR. PATNA 1970 Price—Ee. 0.80 only.] 11 LIST OF AGENTS FOR THE YEAR 1970 (1) Messrs. Etwari Sahu & Sons, Maheiidru, Patna-6. (2) Messrs. Chaudhary & Sons, Law Book Sellers and Publishers, P. O. Mahendru, Patna-6. (3) Messrs. Western Liiw House, OM-Niwas, Opp. Amar Hotel, Fraser Road, Patna-1. (4) Messrs. Motilal Banarsidas, Book Seller, Bankipur, Patna. (5) Messrs. Pahuja Brothers, Law Book Sellers and Publishers, Patna-6, (only for Patna High Court Compound). (6) Messrs. Laxmi Trading Co., Padri-Ki-Haveli, Patna City. (7) Messrs. Pustak Mahal, Ranchi. (8) Messrs. Paper Stationery Stores, D. N. Singh Road, P. O. Bhagal pur-2. (9) Messrs. Raj Kamal Prakashan (Pvt.) Ltd., Patna-6. (10) Messrs. Bengal Law House, Chowhatta, Patna-4. (11) Messrs. Bias Bijaya Press, Jail Road, Arrah. M b. Nalicnal Syeteto* Unlfc I- Educationtl 0 C 0 X>OC.No... ^ t > t e ............................................. MST^OP AMENDING AOIB. 1. Bihar Panohayat Samitis and Zila Parii^ads (Amendment) Act, 1964 (Bihar Act IV of 1964). 2. The Bihar Panohayat Samitis and Zila Pariahads (Amendment) Act, 1970 (President Act no. I of 1970). LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS tfSJJD. Amendment. jBovt. Government. Ina. .. Inserted. L. S.-G. Local Self-Government. No. .. Number. P. .. Page. Pt. .. Part. Subs. Substituted. S. .. Section. Vol. .. Volume. 1^; Syattmm Unte. Nalicr><xl . r t 7 j ^ ^ Phr.n:-..- DOC. No ‘ ■ ‘ G m ».
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution Across States
    Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States Empirical Assessment - 2012-13 April 2013 Sponsored by Ministry of Panchayati Raj Government of India The Indian Institute of Public Administration New Delhi Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States Empirical Assessment - 2012-13 V N Alok The Indian Institute of Public Administration New Delhi Foreword It is the twentieth anniversary of the 73rd Amendment of the Constitution, whereby Panchayats were given constitu- tional status.While the mandatory provisions of the Constitution regarding elections and reservations are adhered to in all States, the devolution of powers and resources to Panchayats from the States has been highly uneven across States. To motivate States to devolve powers and responsibilities to Panchayats and put in place an accountability frame- work, the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Government of India, ranks States and provides incentives under the Panchayat Empowerment and Accountability Scheme (PEAIS) in accordance with their performance as measured on a Devo- lution Index computed by an independent institution. The Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA) has been conducting the study and constructing the index while continuously refining the same for the last four years. In addition to indices on the cumulative performance of States with respect to the devolution of powers and resources to Panchayats, an index on their incremental performance,i.e. initiatives taken during the year, was introduced in the year 2010-11. Since then, States have been awarded for their recent exemplary initiatives in strengthening Panchayats. The Report on"Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States - Empirical Assessment 2012-13" further refines the Devolution Index by adding two more pillars of performance i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Third State Finance Commission
    CHAPTER 5 STATUS OF DECENTRALISED GOVERNANCE A. Brief Historical Overview 5.1 Modern local government in India has a rather long history extending to the earliest years of British rule under the East India Company, when a municipal body was established in Madras in 1688 followed soon thereafter by Bombay and Calcutta. These earliest corporations neither had any legislative backing, having been set up on the instructions of the Directors of the East India Company with the consent of the Crown, nor were they representative bodies as they consisted entirely of nominated members from among the non-native population. They were set up mainly to provide sanitation in the Presidency towns, but they did not prove to be very effective in this task. Act X of 1842 was the first formal measure for the establishment of municipal bodies. Though applicable only to the Bengal Presidency it remained inoperative there. Town Committees under it were, however, set up in the two hill stations of Mussoorie and Nainital in 1842 and 1845 respectively, on the request of European residents. Uttarakhand thus has the distinction of having some of the earliest municipalities established in the country, outside the Presidency towns. Their record too was not very encouraging. When the Government of India passed Act XXVI in 1850 the municipal bodies of Mussoorie and Nainital were reconstituted under it. 5.2 The motivation for establishing municipal bodies in the initial years was not any commitment to local government on the part of the British. Rather it was inspired by the desire to raise money from the local population for provision of civic services.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Rural Decentralization in India, the First Formal Bank Study on This Topic
    OVERVIEW OF RURAL DECENTRALIZATION IN INDIA Volume 1 September 27, 2000 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACR Annual Confidential Report AP Andhra Pradesh BP Block Panchayat CEO Chief Executive Officer CFC Center Finance Commission CSS Centrally Sponsored Schemes DDP Desert Development Program DEA Department of Economic Affairs DPAP Drought Prone Area Program DPC District Planing Committee DRDA District Rural Development Agency EAS Employment Assurance System EGS Education Guarantee Scheme EO Executive Officer GOI Government of India GOMP Government of Madhya Pradesh GP Gram Panchayat IAS Indian Administrative Service IFS Indian Forestry Services IRDP Integrated Rural Development Program JRY Jawahar Rozgar Yojana JSGY Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana MLA Member of Legislative Assembly MLC Member of Legislative Council MP Member of Parliament; Madhya Pradesh NGO Non Governmental Organization OBC Other Backward Caste PRI Panchayat Raj Institution PS Panchayat Samitis Rs. Rupees SAS State Administrative Service SC Scheduled Castes SFC State Finance Commission SGSY Swarnjanyanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana ST Scheduled Tribes TAD Tribal Area Development UNDP United Nations Development Program UP Uttar Pradesh VEC Village Education Committee VTC Voluntary Technical Experts and Core ZP Zilla Parishad ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY .........................................................1 2. DESIGN AT THE CENTER ...............................................................3 A. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panchayat Samiti Elections in Maharashtra: a Data Analysis (1994-2013)
    PANCHAYAT SAMITI ELECTIONS IN MAHARASHTRA: A DATA ANALYSIS (1994-2013) Rajas K. Parchure ManasiV. Phadke Dnyandev C. Talule GOKHALE INSTITUTE OF POLITICS AND ECONOMICS (Deemed to be a University)` Pune (India), 411 001 STUDY TEAM Rajas K. Parchure : Team Leader Manasi V. Phadke : Project Co-ordinator Dnyandev C. Talule Project Co-ordinator Rajesh R. Bhatikar : Editorial Desk Anjali Phadke : Statistical Assistant Ashwini Velankar : Research Assistant Vaishnavi Dande Research Assistant Vilas M. Mankar : Technical Assistance PANCHAYAT SAMITI ELECTIONS IN MAHARASHTRA : A DATA ANALYSIS (1994-2013) 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE NO. NO. Foreword v Acknowledgements vi 1 A Historical Perspective on Local Governance 1 2 Defining Variables and Research Questions 18 3 Data Analysis: Behaviour of Main Variables 25 Across Different Rounds of Elections 4 Data Analysis: Correlations Between Key 85 Variables 5 Conclusion 86 References Appendix – A Data on VT, POL, SCST and REVERSE COMP 89 Across Rounds of Elections Appendix – B Average Values of VT, POL, RESERVE COMP 105 and IND Appendix – C Cluster Analysis of VT, POL, REVERSE COMP, 124 IND and RES Appendix – D Councils Relevant for Immediate Launch of Voter 144 Awareness Programs Appendix – E Councils Relevant for MCC Implementation 146 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune i PANCHAYAT SAMITI ELECTIONS IN MAHARASHTRA : A DATA ANALYSIS (1994-2013) 2016 LIST OF TABLES Tables Content Page No. No. 3.1 Trends in VT across Successive Rounds of Elections 25 3.2 Panchayat Samitis belonging
    [Show full text]
  • Panchayati Raj in India. the Evolution Between 1947 and 1992
    RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITÄT HEIDELBERG FAKULTÄT FÜR WIRTSCHAFTS-UND SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN Panchayati Raj in India The Evolution between 1947 and 1992 Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. rer. pol. an der Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg vorgelegt von: Kai Fabian Fürstenberg Februar 2015 Erstgutachter: Professor Subrata K. Mitra, PhD (Rochester) Zweitgutachter: Professor Dr. Dietmar Rothermund Content List of Figures and Tables iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 State of Research 10 1.2. Why Evolutionary Institutionalism? 13 2. Theory 16 2.1. Rational Choice Institutionalism 17 2.1.1. The Role of the Equilibrium 19 2.1.2. Structured and Unstructured Institutions 21 2.2. Historical Institutionalism 23 2.2.1. Path Dependence and Critical Junctures 25 2.2.2. Critique on Path Dependency 29 2.3. Sociological Institutionalism 30 2.3.1. Isomorphism 31 2.3.2. Change and Legitimacy 34 2.4. Three Institutionalisms – A Critique 35 2.4.1. Oversimplifying Reality: Rational Choice Institutionalism 35 2.4.2. No Change from Within: Historical Institutionalism 36 2.4.3. What are Institutions Exactly? Sociological Institutionalism 38 2.5. Evolution and the Origins of Universal Darwinism 40 2.5.1. Evolutionary Thought: An Overview 41 2.5.2. What is Darwinian Evolution? 44 2.5.3. A Short History of Evolutionary Theory in the Social Sciences 47 2.5.4. Sociobiology and Meme-Theory 48 2.5.4.1. Sociobiology 49 2.5.4.2. Meme-Theory 54 i 2.6. Evolutionary Institutionalism 58 2.6.1. Change: The Analogy between Genes and Institutions 59 2.6.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Women's Political Participation at the Local Level In
    Measurement of women’s political participation at the local level in India By Richa Shanker Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) Abstract The on-going decentralization process in India, which was initiated through the 73rd and 74th amendments of the Indian Constitution gives greater responsibilities and powers to the Panchayats (group of one or more villages in rural areas) and Nagar Palikas (municipality in urban areas) as the third tier of governance, offers new opportunities for local level planning, effective implementation and monitoring of various social and economic development programmes in the country. This will, in turn, help all the sections of the society particularly the weaker sections including women to take part and to share the responsibility of governance and development at least at the sub-district levels in the states. As per the provisions of Article 243 D of the Constitution, one-third of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in Panchayats (local self-Government) at all levels and also those of the Chairpersons are reserved for women. Even some States like Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura and Uttarakhand have legislated for 50% reservation for women. In Sikkim, reservation for women is 40%. As a result of this initiative, out of about 28 lakh elected members in Panchayats, around 10 lakh are women. The last 15 years of Panchayati Raj in India have seen women go from strength to strength in terms of their political participation. To empower Elected Women Representatives instructions have been issued to all States/UTs and other Central Ministries implementing all the Centrally Sponsored Schemes (by Government of India) as follows: (i) All the States / UT Governments may impress upon Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) to ensure the safety of Elected Women Representatives (EWRs) / Female Sarpanches (elected village head), particularly those belonging to the weaker sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Validation of Leprosy Colonies in India: a Study Report
    Identification and Validation of Leprosy Colonies in India: A Study Report Identification and Validation of Leprosy Colonies in India (A Study Report) March 2020 Sasakawa-India Leprosy Foundation IETE Building, II Floor 2, Lodhi Road, Institutional Area, New Delhi, 110003 www.silf.in End Discrimination, Spread Smile........... Page 1 Identification and Validation of Leprosy Colonies in India: A Study Report Table of Contents Sl. Description Pg. No. No. 1 Introduction 4 2 Objectives of the Study 5 3 Limitation of the Study 5 4 Methodology and Approach of the Study 5 4.1 Reaching Out the Major Stakeholders for Cooperation and Available Data 5 4.2 Source of Data 6 4.3 Scope of the Study 6 4.4 Study Method and Tool 6 4.5 Study Variables 6 4.6 Data Collection 7 5 Study Findings 8 5.1 Number of Colonies in the Country 8 5.2 Number of Families and Population Size of the Colonies 21 6 Major Learning and Challenges of the Study 25 7 List of Tables 1. Number of Colonies in the Country 8 2. Rehabilitation Centre and Hospital cum Rehabilitation Centre 11 3. Number of Districts with Colonies as Against Total Number of 18 Districts in the State/UT 4. District with Highest Number of Colonies and Their Demographic 19 Profile 5. Demographic Information of the Colonies 22 End Discrimination, Spread Smile........... Page 2 Identification and Validation of Leprosy Colonies in India: A Study Report 6. Information of the Affected Persons in the Colonies 24 8 List of Annexure 1. Study Tool: Survey Questionnaire 30 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Linkages, Conflicts and Dynamics Between Traditional, Developmental
    Development Research Center on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability Linkages, Conflicts and Dynamics Study Report No. Institutional Spaces and Participation in Local Forest Management in Uttaranchal 3 PRIA Linkages, Conflicts and Dynamics Study Report No. Institutional Spaces and Participation in Local Forest Management in Uttaranchal 3 Ranjita Mohanty PRIA New Delhi First Published by PRIA in March 2004 All rights reserved, No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior written permission of the publisher Foreword Development Research Centre (DRC) on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability is a research partnership based at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Sussex, U.K, which brings together research institutions and practice based civil society groups from India, Brazil, South Africa, Mexico and Nigeria from the South and the U.K from the North. DRC project explores the issues of poverty, exclusion and marginalization within the framework of rights and citizenship. 'Making rights real for poor people' is what DRC project aims at and it seeks to contribute to this goal through research, dissemination, policy influence and capacity building. PRIA entered into this partnership in 2001. As part of DRC, PRIA continues to conduct research studies relating to various aspects of citizenship, participation and accountability. We are happy to bring out this publication as part of DRC study report series and we do hope that the readers will find this exercise beneficial. March, 2004 Rajesh Tandon President, PRIA New Delhi Preface & Acknowledgments Recent times witness many new ways through which people's engagement in development is sought by the state.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER III Panchayati Raj Institutions
    CHAPTER III Panchayati Raj Institutions Act 9. Establishment of Panchayat.- (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare any local area, or a cantonment board constituted under any law for the time being in force to be Panchayat Circle and for every local area declared as such there shall be a Panchayat. (2) Every Panchayat Shall, by the name notified in the Official Gazette, be a body corporate having perpetual succession and common seal and shall, subject to any restrictions and conditions imposed by or under this act or any other law, have power to acquire, by purchase, gift or otherwise, to hold, administer and transfer property, both movable and immovable, and to enter into any contract and shall, by the said name, sue and be sued. (3) The State Government may, at any time, after one month's notice published in the prescribed manner either on its own motion or at the request of the Panchayat or of the residents of the Panchayat Circle, and by notification in the Official Gazette, change the name 1[or place of office] of any such Panchayat. 10. Establishment of Panchayat Samiti.- (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare any local area within the same district to be a block and for every block declared as such there shall be a Panchayat Samiti having jurisdiction, save as otherwise of the provided in this Act, over the entire block excluding such portions of the block as are included in a Municipality or a cantonment board constituted under any law for the time-being in force: Provided that a Panchayat Samiti may have its office in any area comprised within the excluded portion of the Panchayat Samiti.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Self Government Course -424
    BY Dr. ALEYA MOUSAMI SULTANA DEPT. OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, CPBU. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT COURSE -424 UNIT – V Write a note on the system of Panchayati Raj in India. 20 POWER TO THE PEOPLE—THE SYSTEM OF PANCHAYATI RAJ INSTITUTIONS IN INDIA The thought process behind the Panchayati Raj system was to make democracy functional at the local level, and driven by citizens’ needs and participation. It was therefore introduced as a three-tier system that decentralised governance, decision making, and local development. Political decentralization generally means strong and vibrant means of local government. Decision-making being closer to the people, decentralization ensures decision-makers more effective accountability to the governed. Panchayat Raj, a synonym of democratic decentralization, was introduced in India in the late 1950s and early 1960s to restore to the erstwhile institution of Panchayat the pristine glory that it enjoyed in ancient India. BACKGROUND While the panchayat is an old concept in India—through its presence as caste-based panchayats in villages—the structure, processes, and functions of the PRI system today are totally different. Mahatma Gandhi was among the first and most important leaders to advocate for Panchayati Raj. His vision of a village panchayat was a small self-sufficient republic with individual freedom, 1 opportunities for all, and full participation of the people. While the idea seemed revolutionary at the time, it was Gandhi’s endorsement of it that perhaps explains why the PRI system was partially accepted by the makers of our constitution. PRIs were mentioned in Article 40 only as a Directive Principle of State Policy in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttarakhand Development Report
    KH RA AN A D T T U Uttarakhand Development Report PLANNING COMMISSION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI Published by ACADEMIC FOUNDATION NEW DELHI First Published in 2009 by e l e c t Academic Foundation x 2 AF 4772-73 / 23 Bharat Ram Road, (23 Ansari Road), Darya Ganj, New Delhi - 110 002 (India). Phones : 23245001 / 02 / 03 / 04. Fax : +91-11-23245005. E-mail : [email protected] www.academicfoundation.com a o m i t x 2 Published under arrangement with : Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi. Copyright : Planning Commission, Government of India. Cover-design copyright : Academic Foundation, New Delhi. © 2009. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this book shall be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of, and acknowledgement of the publisher and the copyright holder. Cataloging in Publication Data--DK Courtesy: D.K. Agencies (P) Ltd. <[email protected]> Uttarakhand development report / Planning Commission, Government of India. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 13: 9788171887767 ISBN 10: 8171887767 1. Economic development--India--Uttarakhand. 2. Uttarakhand (India)--Economic policy. 3. Uttarakhand (India)-- Social policy. 4. Uttarakhand (India)--Social conditions. I. India. Planning Commission. DDC 338.95451 22 Designed and typeset by Italics India, New Delhi Printed and bound in India. RAKHA TA N T D U Core Committee The Core Committee constituted on 1st January 2002 under the chairmanship of Shri N.K.Singh was as follows: 1 Member (N.K. Singh) Chairman 2 Principal Adviser (SP) Member 3 Planning Secretary, Uttarakhand Member 4 Joint Secretary (SP) Member 5 Representative of other Partner Agency Member 6 Director (SP) Convener The Core Committee which was later reconstituted on 6th August, 2004 under the chairmanship of Dr.
    [Show full text]