Historic Cultural Monuments (HCM), Including the Lovell Heath House (HCM #123; 1929) and the Richard and Dian VOL Research House (HCM #640; 1966)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Cultural Monuments (HCM), Including the Lovell Heath House (HCM #123; 1929) and the Richard and Dian VOL Research House (HCM #640; 1966) DEPARTMfNT OF EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING CITY OF LOS ANGELL "; S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP OFFICE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES CALIFORNIA 200 N. SPRING STRHT, ROOM 620 DIRF.CTOR LOS ANGr:US, CA 90012-4801 (213) 978-1271 (213)978-1200 VINCENT P. BERTONI, A!CP DEPUTY DIRECTOR CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION (213) 978-1272 RICHARD BARRON JANE BlUMf:Nff:lO PR(SII)!'NT 1\CTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROELLA H. LOU!( (213) 978-1272 VICE-PRESIDENT EVA YUAN-MCDANIEL GUN C. DAKE DEPUTY DIRfCTOR CAlL KENNARD (213) 978-1273 OZ SCOTT ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR FAX: (213) 978·1275 FELY C. PJNGOL IN FORMA T!ON COMMISSION EXfCUTIVC ASSISTANT (213) 978-1294 (213) 978-1270 www.planning.ladty.org Date I~PR 0 ll 2010 Los Angeles City Council Room 395, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 ATTENTION: Patrice Lattimore, Legislative Assistant Planning and Land Use Management Committee CASE NUMBER: CHC-201 0-80-HCM BARSHA HOUSE 302 N. MESA ROAD At the Cultural Heritage Commission meeting of April 1, 2010, the Commission moved to include the above property in the list of Historic-Cultural Monument, subject to adoption by the City Council. As required under the provisions of Section 22.171.10 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, the Commission has solicited opinions and information from the office of the Council District in which the site is located and from any Department or Bureau of the city whose operations may be affected by the designation of such site as a Historic-Cultural Monument. Such designation in and of itself has no fiscal impact. Future applications for permits may cause minimal administrative costs. The City Council, according to the guidelines set forth in Section 22.171 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, shall act on the proposed inclusion to the list within 90 days of the Council or Commission action, whichever first occurs. By resolution, the Council may extend the period for good cause for an additional 15 days. The Cultural Heritage Commission would appreciate your inclusion of the subject modification to the list of Historic-Cultural Monuments upon adoption by the City Council. The above Cultural Heritage Commission action was taken by the following vote: Moved: Commissioner Barron Seconded: Commissioner Scott Ayes: Commissioner Louie Absent: Commissioners Dake and Kennard Vote: 3-0 Flt~Commission Executive Assistant Cultural Heritage Commission Attachment: Staff Report with Findings c: Councilmember Bill Rosendahl, Eleventh Council District & Vanessa Withers PLANNING LAND USE MANAGEMENT !) () 9 ~()\ll 1\P" : ·~· ", .- ..... ·.. :·., =··· . =· ~ •. DEI'ARTM ENT Of El(ECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING CITY OF Los ANGELES S, GAIL GOLDBERG, 1\ICP OfFICE Of HISTORIC RESOURCES CALIFORNIA 200 N. SPRING 5TRE£T, ROOM 620 DiRECTOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-4601 m ll 976-1271 1213)978-1200 \llNC£NT P. BERTONI, AICP DEPliTY DIRECTOR CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION (213) 978-1272 RICHARD BARRON )ANE BLUMENFELD PRESIDENT "CliNG DE~UTY DIRECTO~ ROELLA H. lOUIE 1213) 978-1272 VICE-PRESIDEI>Il EVA YUAN-MCDANIEL CLENCDAKE DEPUTY OIRl'CTOR GAIL KENNARD (213) 978-1273 OZSCOTT ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA VACANT MAYOR FAX: 12131 976-1275 INFORMATION FEL V C, PINGOL COMMISSION E~ICU'liVE ASSISTJV>I'I (2131 976-1270 (21 J) 976-12~4 www.planninglacity.org Date APR 0 8 2010 Scott Lander 414 S. Highland Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90036 CERTJFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CASE NUMBER: C HC-201 0-80-HCM BARSHA HOUSE 302 N. MESA ROAD As you will note from the attached copy of our communication to the Los Angeles City Councll, the .1 Cultural Heritage Commission has moved to include the above-referenced property in the list of Historic­ ·j Cultural monuments, subject to adoption by the City Council. 1 J .! In due course, our transmittal will be given a council file number and will be referred to the Council's I Planning and Land Use Management Committee for review and recommendation. If you are interested in l attending the Council Committee meeting, you should call Patrice Lattimore at (213) 978-1074 for ; ~ information as to the time and place of the Committee and City Council meetings regarding this matter. Please give Ms. Lattimore at least one week from the date of this letter to schedule this item on the Committee Agenda before you call her. C. · gol, Commission Executive Assistant Cultural Heritage Commission Attachment: CHC Declaration Letter to Council, Staff Report with Findings, and Additional Finding C: Notification List GIS ' .J .I Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-201 0-80-HCM ENV-2010-81-CE HEARING DATE: April 1, 2010 Location: 302 N. Mesa Road TIME: 10:00 AM Council District 11 PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Brentwood-Pacific 200 N. Spring Street Palisades Los Angeles, CA Area Planning Commission: West Los Angeles 90012 Neighborhood Council: None Legal Description: Lot FR 389 ofTR 1719 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the BARSHA HOUSE REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument APPLICANT/ Scott Lander OWNER: 414 S. Highland Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90036 APPLICANT'S Vanessa Withers REPRESENATIVE: 419 Concord Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument per 'Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7 2. Adopt the report findings. Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Attachments: November 28, 2009 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 302 N. Mesa Rd. CHC-201 0-80-HCM Page 2 of4 FINDINGS 1. The building "embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction" as an example of International Style residential architecture. 2. The building is associated with a master builder, designer, or architect, as a work by master architect Richard J. Neutra. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. SUMMARY Built in 1938 and located in the Santa Monica Canyon area of Pacific Palisades, this one-story single-family residence exhibits character-defining features of International Style architecture. The proposed Barsha House historic monument has a low horizontal profile with an asymmetrical fayade and slanted roof. A gradual, unelaborated row of steps leads to the residence's west entrance while an attached garage is accessed from the east. The front fayade has a partial-width porch with roof overhang and horizontal metal railing. Clad in smooth . stucco with unadorned wall expanses, the subject building's exterior is characterized by horizontal ribbons of steel casement windows lacking decorative detailing or trim. The T­ shaped plan includes a central living room and wings of one-room depth. The western wing is comprised of two main bedrooms and a bathroom and the eastern portion of the floor plan includes a kitchen and maid's quarters with a bathroom. Significant interior features of the house include an intact floor plan with a linear circulation pattern, bathroom fixtures, and extensive custom designed built-in furniture. The subject building was designed by master architect Richard J. Neutra (1892-1970) with P. Pfisterer listed as a collaborator. Neutra, an internationally recognized architect, is recognized for his significant contributions to the advancement of the Modern architecture in Los Angeles. Born in Vienna in 1892, Neutra received his architectural education in Europe under the guidance of Adolf Leos and worked for Erich Mendelsohn in Berlin before immigrating to the United States in 1923. After working briefly for Frank Lloyd Wright at Taliesin, in 1925, Neutra moved to Los Angeles where he collaborated with Rudolf Schindler on numerous projects including the Lovell Beach House (1926). He subsequently developed his own practice and went on to design numerous buildings embodying the International Style, twelve of which are designated as Historic Cultural Monuments (HCM), including the Lovell Heath House (HCM #123; 1929) and the Richard and Dian VOL Research House (HCM #640; 1966). At the time of the Barsha residence commission in the 1930s, Neutra's international reputation had already been recognized. The Barsha House appears to be a significant and important record of 302 N. Mesa Rd. CHC-201 0-80-HCM Page 3 of4 Neutra's work during the late 1930s and shares many of the design details used in his other buildings of the period. The proposed monument was constructed in 1938 for film producer and director, Leon Barsha. The building is not on its original site. It was moved from 4859 Westpark in North Hollywood
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Framework for Preserving Mid-Century Modern Resources: an Examination of Public Perceptions of the Sarasota School of Architecture
    TOWARD A FRAMEWORK FOR PRESERVING MID-CENTURY MODERN RESOURCES: AN EXAMINATION OF PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF THE SARASOTA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE By NORA L. GALLAGHER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 ©2011 Nora Louise Gallagher 2 To my family 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank my committee chair, Morris Hylton, III who showed much patience and dedication to the project. I would also like to thank Sara Katherine Williams who came onto my committee last minute, but with no less dedication. I would also like to thank all of those who took the time out of their day at the beach or lunch schedule to answer my questions. Special thanks also goes Blair Mullins who not only helped with interviewing, but inspired motivation in me. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Phil and Linda Gallagher who used to force me to work on house projects and repairs – without this I would not have an appreciation for what makes a building important, the memories which are made there. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form, “The Tuckahoe Apartments.” (14 June 2000)
    NPS Form 10- 900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ...................................................... - - - ...........................................................................................................................................................................1. Name of Property historic name John Rolfe Apartments other nameslsite number DHR # 127-6513 ---------- 2. Location street & number 101 Tem~sfordLane not for publication NIA city or town Richmond vicinity state Virqinia code & county Independent Citv code 760 zip code 23226 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Presewation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Neutra Powerpoint.Key
    RICHARD NEUTRA Jonathan Marshall Richard Neutra was born April 8th, 1892 in Vienna, Austria. He studied under Adolf Loos at the Technical University of Vienna. In 1923, at the age of 31, Neutra moved to the United States and settled in Southern California. Neutra introduced the International Style to America and (newer) Los Angeles Design to Europe. Briefly worked under Frank Lloyd Wright before accepting work in California. His innovative ideas of the time were well received in Southern California. The Lovell House (The Health House) The Lovell House, built in Los Angeles in 1920, was Neutra’s most influential work. Located on a steeply landscaped hill, it has views of the Pacific Ocean, the Santa Monica mountains, and the city of Los Angeles. The Lovell House The Lovell House was nicknamed the Health House because the interior is brought into harmony with nature as well as having outdoor play and recreation areas. It was similar to of Mies van der Rohe and Le Corbusier’s work in Europe. Comparison Kaufmann Desert House. Barcelona Pavilion. Richard Neutra. Mies Van Der Rohe. -Palm Springs, CA -Barcelona, Spain -was made for 1929 International Exposition German section Richard Neutra Mies van der Rohe Neutra believed in houses that have patios or porches that make the outdoors seem part of the house. He said that “architecture should be a means of bringing man back into harmony with nature”. “As an architect, my life has been governed by the goal of building environmental harmony, functional efficiency, and human enhancement into the experience of everyday living.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Public Library Other Names/Site Number;
    NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 8/86) yill NPS/CHS Word Processor Format JUL 3 11990' L~ (Approved 03/88) NATIONAL United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented , enter "N/A" for "not applicable". For'functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. Use letter quality printers in 12 pitch. Use only 25% or greater cotton content bond paper. 1. Name of Property historic name: Denver Public Library other names/site number; 2. Location street & number; 1357 Broadway (NA) not for publication city, town: Denver (NA) vicinity state: Colorado code: CO county; Denver code;031 zip code:80203 3- Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property No. of Resources within Property ( ) private (X) building(s) contributing noncontributing (X) public-local ( ) district 1 ______ buildings ( ) public-State ( ) site _____ sites ( ) public-Federal ( ) structure _____ structures ( ) object _____ objects 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: No. of contributing resources previously listed in the N/A_______________________________ National Register 0_________ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this (x) nomination ( ) request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Prefabrication and the Post-War House
    142 WITHOUT A HITCH: NEW DIRECTIONS IN PREFABRICATED ARCHITECTURE haps the most important, because it is the principal and most intimately connected with Prefabrication and the environmental conditioning of human beings, is everything we mean when we say the word Postwar House: the “HOUSE.” It is here that we come closest to California manifesto the heart of man’s existence; it is here that he hopes for the satisfaction of his most human needs; it is here that he strikes the firmest roots into the ground; it is here that he achieves his strongest sense of reality not only in terms of things but also in terms of fellow human beings. It is first then to “the house of man” that we must bring the abundant gifts of this age of science in the service of mankind, Matthew W. Fisher realizing that in the word “HOUSE” we encom- Iowa State University pass the full range of those activities and aspi- rations that make one man know all men as himself.”1 In July 1944, a year prior to the cessation of World War II, the California-based journal Arts and Architecture published what was in es- sence a manifesto on the “post-war house” and the opportunities and necessity for prefabrica- tion. This was largely the work of John En- tenza, publisher and editor of Arts and Archi- tecture since the late-Thirties, and his editorial assistants, Charles and Ray Eames, with sig- nificant contributions from Eero Saarinen and Buckminster Fuller, among others. Entenza and his editors were fully aware at the time of the pent-up demand for new housing that awaited the end of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science And
    ARCHITECTURE The Irwin S. Chanin AT COOPER School of Architecture The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art 4:09 -10 The academic year 2009 –20010 was a particularly significant The three exhibitions collectively served as an opportunity We were brought more forcefully to reflect on this tradition, year for The Cooper Union, and equally so for the School for the School of Architecture to reflect on its history and to by the passing this year of two of its major inventors, of Architecture. As the 150th year since the founding of the clarify and articulate a curriculum for the education of Professors Richard Henderson and Raimund Abraham. institution, it was also the 149th year of teaching architecture architects into the twenty first century. In their preparation Richard, who taught at the school for over thirty years, was at Cooper. A timeline included in last year’s edition of we were able to reflect on the extraordinary intersection not only a wise and strong administrator but, more importantly , was further developed and illustrated of tradition, renewal, and innovation represented in the work Architecture At Cooper an innovator in the realm of architectural analysis and one as the prologue for the first of three major exhibitions of the school since its foundation. who placed the analytical process at the center of Cooper’s mounted by the school in the Houghton Gallery, “Architecture From the Nine Square Problem, through Cubes, Topos, approach to design. At a time when the “postmodernists” at Cooper 1859 –2009.” The exhibition chronicled the history Blocks, Bridges, Connections, Communities, Balances, were calling for a return to history in the iconographic and of architecture—and specifically of the architecture of its Walls, Houses, Joints, Skins, to Spheres, Cylinders, Pyramids imitative sense, Richard insisted that analysis was a didactic, buildings—at Cooper from 1859 to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository
    GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Span Dates: 1974-1996, bulk 1974-1978 Conditions Governing Use: Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Conditions Governing Access: Research is by appointment only Source: Surveys were compiled by Tom Sitton, former Head of History Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Background: In 1973, the History Department of the Natural History Museum was selected to conduct surveys of Los Angeles County historic sites as part of a statewide project funded through the National Preservation Act of 1966. Tom Sitton was appointed project facilitator in 1974 and worked with various historical societies to complete survey forms. From 1976 to 1977, the museum project operated through a grant awarded by the state Office of Historic Preservation, which allowed the hiring of three graduate students for the completion of 500 surveys, taking site photographs, as well as to help write eighteen nominations for the National Register of Historic Places (three of which were historic districts). The project concluded in 1978. Preferred Citation: Historic Sites Surveys, Seaver Center for Western History Research, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Special Formats: Photographs Scope and Content: The Los Angeles County historic site surveys were conducted from 1974 through 1978. Compilation of data for historic sites continued beyond 1978 until approximately 1996, by way of Sitton's efforts to add application sheets prepared for National Register of Historic Places nominations. These application forms provide a breadth of information to supplement the data found on the original survey forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Neutra's Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury
    arts Article Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury Matthias Brunner Institute for the History and Theory of Art and Architecture (ISA), Academy of Architecture, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-58-666-5402 Received: 17 October 2018; Accepted: 22 October 2018; Published: 5 November 2018 Abstract: Many architects of the modern movement who, in theory, refused luxury nonetheless responded to the demand for it. Richard J. Neutra was one of them: Although he mostly rejected luxury in his writings, he gained fame for his skills in constructing luxurious residences. This paper explores how he handled such discrepancies. For this purpose, it relates his understanding of luxury to the German debates on the luxury of the interwar period and analyzes two of his most important expensive residences: the Lovell Health House (1927–1929) and the Kaufmann Desert House (1946–1947). It comes to the conclusion that Neutra took an intermediate position between socialist opponents and idealist proponents of luxury. While he acknowledged the importance of objectivity and scientific thinking and agreed to give priority to the improvement of the living conditions of the masses, he was nevertheless much interested in comfort, aesthetics, details, and individualization. Moreover, it draws attention to the fact that Neutra’s houses also reflected his clients’ relationship to luxury. The Kaufmanns asked for a luxurious background for leisure; the Lovells’ wanted a place for a disciplined life that lacked certain essential traits of luxury. Keywords: luxury in architecture; architect and owner; California modern architecture; transatlantic exchange in architecture; Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • REYNER BANHAM REYNERREYNER BANHAM the MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England
    REYNER BANHAM REYNERREYNER BANHAM The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Historian of the Immediate Future Immediate the of Historian REYNER BANHAM REYNER REYNER BANHAM Historian of the Immediate Future Nigel Whiteley © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Frutiger by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Whiteley, Nigel. Reyner Banham: historian of the immediate future / Nigel Whiteley. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-23216-2 (hc.: alk. paper) 1. Banham, Reyner—Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. NA2599.8.B36 W48 2002 720'.92—dc21 2001030605 To my father, Eric, and the memory of my mother, Peggy, with much love and gratitude CONTENTSCONTENTS viii List of Illustrations xii Preface xviii Acknowledgments 2 Introduction 30 1 The Mechanical Sensibility The First Machine Age Revised 80 2 Popular Desires and Rough Poetry The Independent Group, New Brutalism, and Architecture Autre 140 3 Science for Kicks An Architecture of Technology for the Second Machine Age 186 4 The Expanded Field Fit Environments for Human Activities 244 5 Late or Post? Banham’s Modernist Values 308 6 Expendable Icons and Softer Hardware Banham’s Design Criticism 362 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • NR Form for Inhouse
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Case Study House Program: 1945-1966 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Experimental modern residential architecture of the Case Study House Program in California: 1945-1966 C. Form Prepared by name/title Peter Moruzzi / Architectural historian organization Los Angeles Conservancy Modern Committee date Dec 2012; Revised Mar 2013 street & number 2935 Angus Street telephone 323-913-9299 city or town Los Angeles state CA zip code 90039 e-mail [email protected] D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Cultural Resources Reports
    Appendix B Cultural Resources Reports City of Long Beach Park Church 3655 N. Norwalk Blvd. Long Beach, CA Historic Resources Assessment Prepared for: City of Long Beach 333 W. Ocean Boulevard, 7th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 N. Ashwood Avenue Ventura, CA 93003 Authors: Shannon Carmack, B.A. and Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, M.A.. January 2016 Keywords: Los Angeles County; Intensive pedestrian survey; eligible CEQA Carmack, S. and S. Zamudio-Gurrola 2016 Historic Assessment of 3655 North Norwalk Boulevard, City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 14-01181. Report on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton. Historic Resources Assessment Historic Assessment of Park Church Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Personnel ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Regulatory Setting .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arch 5124 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 2 Part 2B
    arch 5124 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 2 Part 2B 30 April 2015 15.3 Mb, 13,751 words 22 Early 20th Century. Modernism 23 Frank Lloyd Wright. Mies van der Rohe 24 Le Corbusier JUGENDSTIL, RIGA, LATVIA Built from 1899. In Riga, two main styles, decorative and romantic-nationalistic. Riga is one of the largest centres of Art Nouveau, with more than a third of the buildings of its Central District;. The main street for Riga's Art Nouveau district is Elizabetes, which crosses Brivibas Boulevard, also Alberta and Strelnieku Streets. There are 800 Jugendstil buildings in Riga. Most were designed and built by Latvian architects. The Latvian Ethnographic Exhibition in 1896 and the Industrial and Handicrafts Exhibition in 1901, which commemorated the city's 700th anniversary were dominated by pavilions designed in the new style. Within three years, Art Nouveau would become the only design style used in construction, adopted in the main by the new generation of architects who graduated from the Riga Polytechnic Institute. Buildings built at the beginning of the century in the city's medieval centre and on Alberta iela, most of which were designed by the Russian architect Eisenstein and the German architects Scheffel and Scheel. The floral, geometric and sculptural motifs decorating these buildings create rhythms that are typical of eclectic architecture. Refer: Latvian Museum of Architecture located in one of the Three Brothers, Old Town. Mikhail Eisenstein, architect In the decorative Jugendstil style, father of director Sergei Eisenstein. Elizabetes 10a and 10b, and Alberta 2, 2a, 4 and 8. Alberta 13 From 1904, now the Riga Graduate School of Law, fully restored and publicly accessible.
    [Show full text]