<<

DOE-NETL Cooperative Agreement #DE-EE0005445

Lubricant Formulations to Enhance Efficiency (LFEEE) in Modern Internal Combustion :

Project ID FT019

Prof. Wai K. Cheng, Principal Investigator Dr. Victor W. Wong, Co-Investigator

Michael Plumley, Tomas Martins Mark Molewyk, Grace Gu, Dr Soo-Youl Park

Sloan Automotive Laboratory Cambridge, Massachusetts June 19, 2014

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Agenda

I. Objectives

II. Background and Approach

III. Accomplishments 1. Power Cylinder Modeling 2. Valve Train Modeling/Experiment 3. Engine Experiment

IV. Conclusions

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 2 Project Objective

“Investigate, develop, and demonstrate low-, environmentally-friendly and commercially-feasible lubricant formulations that would significantly improve the mechanical efficiency of modern engines by at least 10% (versus 2002 level) without incurring increased , emissions or deterioration of the emission-aftertreatment system”

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 3 Lubricant Formulations for Enhanced Engine Efficiency (LFEEE)

• DOE Vehicle Technologies (VT) Program – 3 year – 3 grad students – Industry Partners • Infineum • Kohler • Cummins Filtration • Related Projects • Supertruck

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 4 Phases – LFEEE (Lubricant Formulation to…)

Phase 1: Investigate ideal formulations tailored to each major subsystem for best performance

Phase 2: Investigate composite formulations for combined system

Phase 3: Demonstrate mechanical efficiency improvement for best formulation over a range of operating conditions

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 5 INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 6 Background - Functions of lubricant/additives:

1. Base : API Groups: I, II (low S), III (low S, high VI), IV: synthetic, V other

2. Additives: - Detergents automotive lubricant - Dispersants - Anti-Wear Additives - Anti-oxidants (20-30%) - VI and Friction Modifiers - Anti-foam - Pour-point depressants - Extreme-pressure wear, etc Base Oil

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 7 Background - Functional Requirements

• Valvetrain – High EHD pressures (~2000 MPa) – Low Temp – No combustion gas/soot – No path to tailpipe

• Power Cylinder – Predominantly hydro – High Temp (rings ~250C) – Hostile (acidic) environment

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 8 Friction (Top Ring, Skirt), Position & Temperature Domain

Temperature vs Liner Position

0 A50 A100 Inst Power Loss vs Position, 15W40, A100 -50 0 - 195 -100

-150 -34 - 150 -50 - 140 -200 Distance from Top Ring TDC [mm] TDC Ring Top from Distance

-250 -100 - 117 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Temp [C]

Viscosity vs Temperature -150 - 100

Temperature [C]

ring -200 - 98

Distance from Top Ring TDC [mm] TDC Ring Top from Distance Hydro skirt -250 Bound - 96

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Instantaneous Power Loss [W] INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 9 Optimizing –Upper and Lower Temperature vs Friction and Wear

RING Peak Wear vs Friction Loss 48 15W40 46 VM1 VM2 44 42 VM3 40 38 VM4 Total Loss Friction (W) Total 36 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 Peak Wear Factor (W) wear

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 10 Optimizing –Upper and Lower Temperature Viscosity vs Friction and Wear

RING Peak Wear vs Friction Loss 48 15W40 46 VM1 VM2 44 42 VM3 40 38 VM4 Total Loss Friction (W) Total 36 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 Peak Wear Factor (W) wear

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 11 Optimizing –Upper and Lower Temperature Viscosity vs Friction and Wear

RING Peak Wear vs Friction Loss 48 15W40 46 VM1 VM2 44 42 VM3 40 38 VM4 Total Loss Friction (W) Total 36 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 Peak Wear Factor (W) wear

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 12 Viscosity vs Temp design parameters for ηmech

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 13 Vaporization/Friction Models

Oil Film Thickness vs Postion, 15W40, A100

0 ------TDC Top Ring ------TDC Second Ring

-20 ------TDC Oil Control Ring

-40

-60

Dist from Top Ring TDC [mm] TDC Ring Top from Dist -80 Intak e Power -100 0 1 2 3 Film Thickness[ µm]

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 14 Vaporization/Friction Models

Avg Molecular Weight vs Postion, 15W40, A100 Viscosity vs Position, 15W40, A100

No Vap Vap 0 0

-20 -20

-40 -40

-60 -60

-80 -80 Distance from Top Ring TDC [mm] TDC Ring Top from Distance Distance from Top Ring TDC [mm] TDC Ring Top from Distance

-100 -100 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 0 5 10 15 Avg MW [kg/kmol] Viscosity [cSt] + 1.1% total top ring friction -15.0% boundary friction + 1.6% hydrodynamic friction -17.0% wear factor

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 15 Power Cylinder modeling - Accomplishments/Looking Forward Inspired strategies: •Lubricant formulation strategy – maintain temp, vary lubricant…. – Developing optimal power cylinder lubricant with Infineum/DDC – Presence of heavy component may provide wear benefit and allow lower viscosity midstroke

• In situ control strategy – maintain lubricant, vary temperature – (Supertruck program efforts)

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 16 Power Cylinder modeling - Accomplishments/Looking Forward Publications: – Plumley, Wong, Molewyk, Park. “Optimizing Base Oil Viscosity Temperature Dependence For Power Cylinder Friction Reduction” SAE Paper 2014-01-1658 – Molewyk, Wong. “In Situ Control of Lubricant Properties for Reduction of Power Cylinder Losses through Thermal Barrier Coating” SAE Paper 2014-01-1659

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 17 Valvetrain Temperature Dependence

• Valve Train modeled with GT Suite • Experimental Bench Tests

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 18 Significant boundary friction identified at low speed in actual system

25%

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 19 Valvetrain Studies- Accomplishments/Looking Forward • Inspired strategies: – In absence of fuel system, significant boundary friction at low speed • Reduce shear thinning (developed pure Newtonian SAE 40) • Reduce temperature (split lubricating system option)

• Presentations: – Plumley, Wong, Devine, Bansal. “Analysis of shear-thinning on engine friction using mineral and PAO base ” STLE 2014 Annual Meeting – Martins, Plumley, Wong. “Engine Lubricant Viscosity Optimization for Valvetrain and Power Cylinder Systems” STLE 2014 Annual Meeting

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 20 Split System Engine Tests

• Diagnostic tool

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 21 Slight total engine friction benefit with lower multigrade in power cylinder

10W30/15W40, +1%

15W40/15W40, 0%

10W30/10W30, -3%

15W40/10W30, -4.5%

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 22 Slight Total Mechanical Efficiency benefit with lower multigrade in power cylinder

80 15W40/10W30 10W30/10W30 75 3%

70

65

60 Mechanical Efficiency Mechanical

55

50 1.8 2.8 3.8 NIMEP4.8 5.8 6.8 7.8

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 23 Oil Aging - NEW40 sample, 8 hours in test engine

New Valve Power Train Cylinder

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 24 Whole Engine Studies- Accomplishments/Looking Forward • Accomplishments: – Established working split system prototype – Demonstrated split system benefit with base oils • Presentations: – Plumley, Wong, Devine, Bansal. “Analysis of shear- thinning on engine friction using mineral and PAO base oils” STLE 2014 Annual Meeting – Martins, Plumley, Wong. “Engine Lubricant Viscosity Optimization for Valvetrain and Power Cylinder Systems” STLE 2014 Annual Meeting

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 25

SUMMARY – Milestone Progress

• M1: Initial modeling power-cylinder ↑ • M2: Initial modeling Valve Train ↑ • M3: Initial spec for test matrix w/ industry ↑ • M4: Modify engine for split system ↑ • M5: Diagnostic instruments on test engine ↑ • M6: Parametric Effects Tests ↑ • M7: Floating liner test X

↑ = milestone reached

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 26 SUMMARY – Milestone Progress

• M8: Model local variable formulations ↑ • M9: Parametric Tests, one oil, full mix ↑ • M10: Parametric Lube Tests, one oil, split ↑ • M11: Parametric Lube Tests, 2 oils, split ↑ • M12: Full Demo, Optimized Oil − (July ‘14) • M13: Aftertreatment Impact Assessment − (July ‘14)

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 27 CONCLUSIONS

• The research team has identified and formulated lubricants that optimize the power cylinder friction • The research team has identified and formulated lubricants that optimize the valvetrain friction • The benefit (lower overall engine friction) of the split lubricant circuits has been demonstrated • All scheduled milestones were met

INTRO POWER HEAD ENGINE SUMMARY 28