Arxiv:0906.4487V1 [Hep-Th] 24 Jun 2009 Wilson Loops
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ITEP–TH–21/09 A Brief Introduction to Wilson Loops and Large N Yuri Makeenko Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia∗ A pedagogical introduction to Wilson loops, lattice gauge theory and the 1/N-expansion of QCD is presented. The three introductory lectures were given at the 37th ITEP Winter School of Physics, Moscow, February 9–16, 2009. PACS numbers: 11.15.Pg, 11.15.Ha, 12.38.Aw I. INTRODUCTION A wave function at the point x is transformed as g.t. In these lecture notes I give a brief pedagogical intro- ϕ(x) e ıα(x) ϕ(x) , (4) −→ duction to the methods used in nonperturbative inves- tigations of QCD and other gauge theories. The main therefore the phase factor is transformed as the product † attention is payed to Wilson loops, both on the lattice ϕ(y)ϕ (x): and in the continuum, which play a central role in mod- g.t. † ern formulations of gauge theories and to the method of U[Γyx] “ϕ(y) ϕ (x)”. (5) the 1/N expansion. ∼ For further studies of this subject I can recommend the A wave function at the point x transforms like one at textbook [1] which contains detail references. In this text the point y after multiplication by the phase factor: I restrict myself only with references to a few classical g.t. papers. U[Γ ] ϕ(x) “ϕ(y)”, (6) yx ∼ and analogously Lecture I g.t. ϕ†(y) U[Γ ] “ϕ†(x)”. (7) Wilson loops yx ∼ The phase factor plays the role of a parallel transporter Wilson loops are essentially phase factors in Abelian or in an electromagnetic field, and to compare phases of a non-Abelian gauge theories. Wilson loops are observable wave function at points x and y, we should first make in quantum theory by the Aharonov–Bohm effect. Wil- a parallel transport along some contour Γyx. The result son loops play a central role in the lattice formulation of is Γ-dependent except when Aµ(z) is a pure gauge (van- gauge theories. QCD can be reformulated through the ishing field strength Fµν (z)). Certain subtleties occur Wilson loops in a manifest gauge-invariant way. Ana- for not simply connected spaces (the Aharonov–Bohm logues of the Wilson loops are extremely useful in solving effect). various kinds of matrix models. B. Propagators in external field II. PHASE FACTORS IN QED Let us consider a quantum particle in a classical elec- arXiv:0906.4487v1 [hep-th] 24 Jun 2009 A. Definition and basic properties tromagnetic field. To introduce electromagnetic field, ∂µ is to be replaced by the covariant derivative Abelian phase factor is defined by the formula ∂µ µ = ∂µ ıeAµ(x) . (8) µ ıe R dz Aµ(z) −→ ∇ − U[Γ ]= e Γyx . (1) yx For the propagator we get Under the gauge transformation ∞ 1 − 1 τm2 g.t. 1 G(x, y; A)= dτ e 2 Aµ(z) Aµ(z)+ ∂µα(z) , (2) 2 Z −→ e 0 1 τ 2 τ µ − R dt z˙ (t)+ıe R dt z˙ (t)Aµ(z(t)) the Abelian phase factor transforms as zµ(t)e 2 0 µ 0 . × Z D g.t. z (0)=x U[Γ ] e ıα(y) U[Γ ]e −ıα(x). (3) µ µ (9) yx −→ yx zµ(τ)=yµ The exponent is just the classical (Euclidean) action of a particle in an external electromagnetic field. The path- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] integral representation (9) for the propagator of a scalar 2 The phase difference depends on (the real part of) µ µ ıe R + dz Aµ(z) −ıe R − dz Aµ(z) e Γyx e Γyx ıe dzµA (z) ıe dσµν F ıeHS electron beam HΓ µ R µν ¨XXX = e = e = e , (12) ¨¨ XXz ¨ XXX ¨* solenoid XXX interference where the closed contour Γ is composed from Γ+ and ¨ ¨¨ yx ¨ ¨ plane Γ− . It does not depend on the shape of Γ+ and Γ− but H¨source H=06 ¨ xy yx yx s H ¨ depends only on HS — the magnetic flux through the H ¨ Hj ¨¨* solenoid. HH ¨ H ¨ electronH¨ beam III. YANG-MILLS THEORIES screen Modern theories of fundamental interactions are gauge theories. The principle of local gauge invariance was in- troduced by H. Weyl for the electromagnetic interaction FIG. 1: Scheme of the Aharonov–Bohm experiment. in analogy with general covariance in Einstein’s theory of gravitation. An extension to non-Abelian gauge groups was given by Yang and Mills in 1954 [3]. particle in an external electromagnetic field is due to A crucial role in gauge theories is played by the phase Feynman. factor which is associated with parallel transport in an We can alternatively rewrite Eq. (9) as external gauge field. The phase factors are observable in quantum theory, in contrast to classical theory. This is µ −S [Γyx]+ıe R dz Aµ(z) G(x, y; A) = e free Γyx , (10) analogous to the Aharonov–Bohm effect for the electro- magnetic field. XΓyx where we represented the (parametric invariant) integral A. Gauge invariance over dt as the contour integral along the trajectory Γyx over The principle of local gauge invariance deals with the dzµ = dt z˙µ(t) . (11) gauge transformation (g.t.) of a matter field ψ, which is given by The transition amplitude of a quantum particle in a g.t. classical electromagnetic field is the sum over paths of ψ(x) ψ′(x) = Ω(x) ψ(x) . (13) −→ the Abelian phase factor (1). Here Ω(x) G with G being a semisimple Lie group which is called∈ the gauge group (G = SU(3) for QCD). C. Aharonov–Bohm effect Equation (13) demonstrates that ψ belongs to the fun- damental representation of G. The unitary gauge group is when Transverse components of the electromagnetic field de- scribe photons. Longitudinal components are related to Ω−1(x) = Ω†(x) , (14) gauging the phase of a wave function, i.e. permit one to compare its values at different space-time points when an while an extension to other Lie groups is straightforward. electron is placed in an external electromagnetic field. Then we have In quantum mechanics, the wave-function phase itself † g.t. ′ † † † is unobservable. Only the phase differences are observ- ψ (x) ψ (x) = ψ (x)Ω (x) . (15) −→ able, e.g. via interference phenomena. The phase differ- ence depends on the value of the phase factor for a given In analogy with QCD, the gauge group G = SU(N) is usually associated with color and the proper index of ψ path Γyx along which the parallel transport is performed. The phase factors are observable in quantum theory, in is called the color index. contrast to classical theory. This is seen in the Aharonov– The gauge transformation (13) of the matter field ψ Bohm effect [2] whose scheme is depicted in Fig. 1. can be compensated by a transformation of the non- Abelian gauge field which belongs to the adjoint rep- Electrons do not pass inside the solenoid where the mag- Aµ netic field is concentrated. Nevertheless, a phase differ- resentation of G: ence arises between the electron beams passing through g.t. (x) ′ (x) the two slits. The interference picture changes with the Aµ −→ Aµ value of the electric current. = Ω(x) (x)Ω†(x)+ıΩ(x) ∂ Ω†(x) . (16) Aµ µ 3 It is convenient to introduce the Hermitian matrix B. Non-Abelian phase factors (Wilson loops) [ (x)]ij = g Aa (x) [ta]ij , (17) Aµ µ Xa To compare phases of wave functions at distinct points, a non-Abelian extension of the parallel transporter is where g is the gauge coupling constant. needed. The proper extension of the Abelian formula (1): The matrices [ta]ij are the generators of G (a = 2 µ 1,...,N 1 for SU(N)) which are normalized such that ı RΓ dz Aµ(z) − U[Γyx] = P e yx , (29) tr tatb = δab, (18) includes the symbol P of path-ordering. where tr is the trace over the matrix indices i and j. Although the matrices µ(z) do not commute, the Quite often another normalization of the generators path-ordered exponential onA the RHS of Eq. (29) is de- ˜a˜b 1 ab with an extra factor of 1/2, tr t t = 2 δ , is used for fined unambiguously. This is obvious after rewriting the historical reasons, in particular t˜a = σa/2 for the SU(2) phase factor in an equivalent form group, where σa are the Pauli matrices. This results in µ τ µ ı R dz Aµ(z) ı R dt z˙ (t) Aµ(z(t)) the redefinition of the coupling constant,g ˜2 =2g2. P e Γyx = P e 0 . (30) Equation (17) can be inverted to give The path-ordered exponential in Eq. (29) can be un- a 1 a derstood as Aµ(x) = tr µ(x) t . (19) g A τ Substituting U[Γ ] = [1 + ı dt z˙µ(t) (z(t))] . (31) yx Aµ tY=0 Ω(x)= e ıα(x), (20) we obtain for an infinitesimal α: Using Eq. (11), Eq. (31) can also be written as g.t. adj µ δ µ(x) = α(x) . (21) U[Γ ] = [1 + ı dz (z)] . (32) A ∇µ yx Aµ Here z∈YΓyx adj If the contour Γ is discretized, then the non-Abelian µ α ∂µα ı [ µ, α] (22) yx ∇ ≡ − A phase factor is approximated by is the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation of G, while U[Γyx] fun M µ ψ ∂µψ ı µψ (23) µ zi + zi−1 ∇ ≡ − A = lim 1+ı(zi zi−1) µ , M→∞ − A 2 is that in the fundamental representation.