Covered Warrants – an Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Covered Warrants – an Introduction FLEXIBILITY THAT CAN DELIVER MAGNIFIED RETURNS Covered warrants – an introduction COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 1 10/6/09 6:53:11 PM Contents What is a covered warrant? 2 Types of covered warrants 3 Features of covered warrants 5 Pricing of covered warrants 8 Comparison of covered warrants 9 Strategies and risks involved 10 How to start using covered warrants 12 Q&A 14 Glossary 15 2 1 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 2 10/6/09 6:53:39 PM Covered warrants – an introductory guide Covered warrants were made available to UK private investors for the first time when they were introduced on the London Stock Exchange in October 2002. These versatile instruments, which have already proved popular in other countries, offer a variety of investment solutions for a range of investors. This guide is designed to introduce covered warrants and to help you decide whether they meet your investment needs. The brochure outlines the different types of covered warrants available, considers their benefits and features, and also the risks associated with them. 2 1 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 1 10/6/09 6:53:40 PM What is a covered warrant? Covered warrants are listed securities issued by financial institutions and then made available for Fact box trading on the London Stock Exchange. A covered One of the questions many investors ask is warrant gives the holder the right, but not the where the name comes from – why are they obligation to buy or sell an underlying asset, at a called covered warrants? The term ‘covered’ specified price, on or before a predetermined date. denotes the fact that when the issuer sells a warrant to an investor, they will often For many investors, covered warrants will seem ‘cover’ (hedge) their exposure by buying the similar to options. Covered warrants typically have underlying stock in the market, or by using longer maturities than options, and are issued other instruments. Covered warrants have on over a wider range of assets. The terms are also average a life of six to twelve months, although more varied – covered warrants are highly flexible some have a longer (or occasionally open- and can be issued with terms structured to meet ended) lifespan. They can be bought and sold market demand. at any point during their lifetime. With covered warrants you cannot lose more than your initial investment. Your maximum loss is known in advance, and there are no margin calls, ie further payments to maintain your position. This differentiates covered warrants from some other forms of derivatives. 2 3 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 2 10/6/09 6:53:40 PM Types of covered warrants Stock warrants Commodity Covered warrants on single stocks represent It can be difficult for private investors to gain a significant number of those available. The main exposure in sterling to major commodities. Using focus is on popular UK ‘blue-chip’ shares. There covered warrants it is possible for investors to are also some covered warrants on popular shares take positions on commodities in small size and in other markets. in sterling. Baskets Currency For exposure to a particular theme or sector, The same applies to currencies. Covered warrants a number of stocks are sometimes grouped are available on a range of exchange rates. together in a ‘basket’. Investors can then obtain exposure to this basket simply and efficiently by buying one single security in the form of a covered warrant. Index In most covered warrant markets around the world, the most actively traded instruments are those on the main domestic market index. In the UK, the FTSE 100 Index has been a consistently popular underlying. Covered warrants have also been issued over other UK market indices such as the FTSE 250 Index, and a range of overseas indices including the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq 100 Index, Nikkei 225 Index, Hang Seng Index, DAX Index, CAC 40 Index amongst others. 2 3 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 3 10/6/09 6:54:03 PM Covered warrants offer a wide variety of underlying products including equities, indices, commodities and currencies. 4 5 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 4 10/6/09 6:54:41 PM Features of covered warrants Calls and puts Conversion ratio Covered warrants exist in two basic forms – The conversion ratio is the number of covered a call or a put. They allow the holder to benefit warrants required to gain exposure to one unit of from either a rising or a falling market. the underlying asset. It is sometimes called parity, The holder of a covered warrant has the right but the cover ratio, or simply the ratio. not the obligation to either buy (call) or sell (put) an underlying asset at a predetermined price (known Exercise style as the exercise or strike price) on or before a Covered warrants can either be European or certain date in the future. A call warrant usually American style. A European-style warrant allows rises in value when the underlying asset rises in you to exercise your right only on the expiry date, value, whilst a put warrant usually rises in value whereas with an American-style warrant you can when the underlying asset falls in value. do this at any time between the date of issuance and the expiry date. In practice, this distinction Expiry date has little influence over covered warrant pricing or Covered warrants usually have a predetermined trading given that during the lifetime of the covered maturity which is set when the warrant is first warrant selling the instrument will almost always issued. The expiry date is the last date that the be more profitable than early exercise. covered warrant can be exercised. Intrinsic value and premium/time value Strike price (or exercise price) Covered warrant prices are typically composed The strike price represents the price at which the of two elements. The first element is the value investor has the right to buy (call) or sell (put) an which a covered warrant would have if it were underlying asset. Covered warrant issuers often to be exercised immediately, which is called issue a range of strike prices over each underlying the intrinsic value. In the case of a call covered security, providing investors with a choice of warrant, for example, carrying the right to buy one covered warrants to reflect their particular view share at 100p, if the underlying share is trading of the market. at 150p, then the covered warrant (assuming a conversion ratio of 1:1) has an intrinsic value of 50p. In practice, however, the covered warrant will trade at a market price higher than 50p. There is a second element in the price, namely time value, which reflects the time to expiry. Time value diminishes as covered warrants near their final maturity. 4 5 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 5 10/6/09 6:54:42 PM Loss of time value Gearing As a general rule of thumb, covered warrants lose Gearing is calculated by dividing the asset price one-third of their time value during the first half of by the covered warrant price (adjusted for the their lives, and two-thirds during the second half. conversion ratio if necessary). If an underlying The accelerating loss of time value on approach share price is 100p, for example, and a covered to expiry means that short-dated warrants with warrant with a ratio of 1:1 is trading at 20p, the significant levels of premium can carry a high risk. gearing is five times. This figure measures the amount of additional exposure gained by investing Gearing and leverage in covered warrants rather than directly in the For most investors a prime reason for buying underlying asset. An investor buying a warrant at covered warrants is the gearing or leverage which 20p is effectively gaining exposure to an asset they offer. Both terms relate to the capacity of worth 100p – five times as much. covered warrants to magnify returns. This gearing benefit can be interpreted aggressively or defensively. The former means that investors can invest their normal investment sum in covered warrants, thereby ‘gearing up’ and gaining exposure to a much larger asset value. The alternative is to ‘gear down’ and to gain the same exposure by investing a lesser amount in covered warrants. This latter strategy can be used to reduce the potential maximum loss from a holding. 6 7 COL4319_LSE covered warrants introduction.indd 6 10/6/09 6:54:42 PM Leverage Key benefits of covered warrants Often, investors are most interested in the extra • offer access to a range of markets, including degree of price movement which covered warrants international markets can provide exposure to. This is not measured • offer a wide variety of underlying products by simple gearing, which usually overstates the including equities, indices, commodities and multiple of movement, but by leverage, sometimes currencies called elasticity or ‘effective gearing’. • give you the opportunity to expand your Leverage is calculated by multiplying simple portfolio in new directions without actually gearing by another indicator called the delta, and buying the underlying products measures the additional degree of price movement which might be expected from the covered • provide gearing, but limit the risk to the warrants. Covered warrants with leverage of four amount invested times, for example, might be expected to move • all covered warrants are ‘cash-settled’ – the four times as much in percentage terms as their gain achieved on the covered warrant is underlying asset. transferred to the holder without the holder Leverage should only be used as an approximation, having to carry out a buy or sell trade – this however, as the figure changes constantly with means holders do not have to pay stamp changes in the price of the underlying asset, the duty that is usually incurred on UK share covered warrants, and with the time remaining purchases to expiry.
Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Product and Service Risk Disclosures Is for Use by 1
    Schedule of Product and Service Risk PART II: : PRODUCTS AND INVESTMENTS Disclosures Set out below is an outline of the major categories of risk that may be PART I: INTRODUCTION associated with certain generic types of Financial Instruments, which should be read in conjunction with Parts III and IV. This Schedule of Product and Service Risk Disclosures is for use by 1. SHARES AND OTHER TYPES OF EQUITY INSTRUMENTS professional clients of the following J.P. Morgan companies only and must not be relied on by anyone else. The companies are: J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, 1.1 General JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, J.P. Morgan Limited, J.P. Morgan Securities plc (“JPMS plc”), J.P. Morgan Markets Limited, A risk with an equity investment is that the company must both grow in value J.P. Morgan AG and J.P. Morgan Dublin plc, these companies being referred and, if it elects to pay dividends to its shareholders, make adequate dividend to collectively or, as the context may require, individually, as “J.P. Morgan” payments, or the share price may fall. If the share price falls, the company, if and to any “Affiliate” of J.P. Morgan being direct or indirect subsidiaries of listed or traded on-exchange, may then find it difficult to raise further capital to J.P. Morgan and the direct or indirect subsidiaries of J.P. Morgan’s direct or finance the business, and the company’s performance may deteriorate vis a indirect holding companies from time to time, any entity directly or indirectly vis its competitors, leading to further reductions in the share price.
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Content of Put Warrant Issues
    The Information Content of Put Warrant Issues Scott Gibson a Paul Povel b Rajdeep Singh b February 2006 a Department of Economics and Finance, School of Business, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187. b Department of Finance, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Email: [email protected] (Gibson), [email protected] (Povel) and [email protected] (Singh). We are grateful to Sugato Bhattacharyya, Francesca Cornelli, Gustavo Grullon, Dirk Jenter, Jack Kareken, Ross Levine, Bob McDonald, Roni Michaely, Sheridan Titman, Andrew Winton, and seminar participants at the 11th annual Financial Economics and Accounting conference at Ann Arbor, MI, and at University of Minnesota and Cornell University for their helpful comments. The Information Content of Put Warrant Issues Abstract We analyze why ¯rms may want to issue put warrants, i.e., promises to repurchase their own shares at a given price in the future. We describe four alternative explanations, one of which is novel: that put warrants are issued by ¯rms that wish to signal their good future prospects to their investors (who undervalue the ¯rms in the eyes of their managers). We test the validity of the four alternative explanations, using a new, hand-collected data set on put warrant issues in the U.S. between 1993 and 1999. We ¯nd evidence that is inconsistent with three of the four explanations. Only the signaling explanation is consistent with the empirical evidence. Put warrant issuers strongly outperform their peers in the years after the put warrant issues; they enjoy valuable and improving investment opportunities, and they invest heavily.
    [Show full text]
  • Covered Warrants and Leverage Certificates Sedex
    SeDeX Covered Warrants and Leverage Certificates SeDeX “Leverage Foreword products increase the potential Covered Warrants and Leverage Certificates are the Leverage effect two categories of securitised derivatives listed on the Leverage effect amplifies both SeDeX that are characterised by the presence of underlying rises leverage effect. This is the mechanism whereby investors – through a and falls derivative – are able to control a certain underlying by performance Instruments with leverage effect allow investors investing just a small part of the capital needed to acquire the opportunity to participate in the performance of possession thereof. In this way, whenever a change occurs the underlying asset to an extent that is more than in the value of the underlying, the percentage variations of proportional to the changes in the underlying, an instrument with leverage effect are greater than those and in so doing to enhance the potential yield pertaining to a direct investment in the underlying. of the portfolio.” of their portfolio. These instruments are suitable for experienced investors who understand their working mechanisms and who use them to make targeted investments in underlyings that are expected to generate a profit. “Leverage products Easy to access, simple to use can be traded Covered Warrants and Leverage Certificates can be easily purchased and sold, just like shares, at any time during the for very small continuous trading phase of the SeDeX market. It is therefore quick and easy for investors to constantly amounts.” monitor their investments. Investments in leverage products can be made even for very small amounts and without the need to apply the margin deposit payment system.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Swaps and Credit Derivatives
    PRODUCT SUMMARY A SSET S WAPS Creating Synthetic Instruments Prepared by The Financial Markets Unit Supervision and Regulation PRODUCT SUMMARY A SSET S WAPS Creating Synthetic Instruments Joseph Cilia Financial Markets Unit August 1996 PRODUCT SUMMARIES Product summaries are produced by the Financial Markets Unit of the Supervision and Regulation Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Product summaries are pub- lished periodically as events warrant and are intended to further examiner understanding of the functions and risks of various financial markets products relevant to the banking industry. While not fully exhaustive of all the issues involved, the summaries provide examiners background infor- mation in a readily accessible form and serve as a foundation for any further research into a par- ticular product or issue. Any opinions expressed are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Reserve System. Should the reader have any questions, comments, criticisms, or suggestions for future Product Summary topics, please feel free to call any of the members of the Financial Markets Unit listed below. FINANCIAL MARKETS UNIT Joseph Cilia(312) 322-2368 Adrian D’Silva(312) 322-5904 TABLE OF CONTENTS Asset Swap Fundamentals . .1 Synthetic Instruments . .1 The Role of Arbitrage . .2 Development of the Asset Swap Market . .2 Asset Swaps and Credit Derivatives . .3 Creating an Asset Swap . .3 Asset Swaps Containing Interest Rate Swaps . .4 Asset Swaps Containing Currency Swaps . .5 Adjustment Asset Swaps . .6 Applied Engineering . .6 Structured Notes . .6 Decomposing Structured Notes . .7 Detailing the Asset Swap .
    [Show full text]
  • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in Conservatorship: Frequently Asked Questions
    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in Conservatorship: Frequently Asked Questions Updated May 31, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44525 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in Conservatorship: Frequently Asked Questions Summary Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are chartered by Congress as government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) to provide liquidity in the mortgage market and promote homeownership for underserved groups and locations. The GSEs purchase mortgages, retain the credit risk (for a fee), and package them into mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) that they either keep as investments or sell to institutional investors. In the years following the housing and mortgage market turmoil that began around 2007, the GSEs experienced financial difficulty. By 2008, the GSEs’ financial condition had weakened, generating concerns over their ability to meet their combined obligations on $1.2 trillion in bonds and $3.7 trillion in MBSs that they had guaranteed at the time. In response, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the GSEs’ primary regulator, took control of them in a process known as conservatorship. Subject to the terms of the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (PSPAs) between the U.S. Treasury and the GSEs, Treasury provided funds to keep the GSEs solvent. The GSEs initially agreed to pay Treasury a 10% cash dividend on funds received, and dividends were suspended for all other GSE stockholders. If the GSEs had enough profit at the end of the quarter, the dividend came out of the profit. When the GSEs did not have enough cash to pay their dividend to Treasury, they asked for additional cash to make the payment instead of issuing additional stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Collateralized Loan Obligations (Clos) July 2021 ASSET MANAGEMENT | FACT SHEET
    ® Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) July 2021 ASSET MANAGEMENT | FACT SHEET Conning believes that CLOs are a compelling asset class for insurers in today’s market. As floating-rate securities, they offer income protection in varying market environments while also minimizing duration. At the same time, CLO securities (i.e. tranches) typically offer higher yields than similarly rated corporate bonds and other structured products. The asset class also provides strong capital preservation through structural protections and investor-oriented covenants. Historically, the CLO structure has proven to be extremely resilient through multiple market cycles. In fact there has never been a default in the AAA and AA -rated CLO debt tranches.1 Negative correlation to U.S. Treasury Bonds and low correlations to U.S. investment grade corporate bonds and equities present valuable diversification benefits. CLOs also offer an opportunity to access debt issuers that do not participate in the high-yield bond markets. How CLOs Work Team The CLO collateral manager purchases a portfolio of loans (typically 150-300) Andrew Gordon using the proceeds from the sale of CLO tranches (debt & equity). The interest Octagon, CEO earned from the loan collateral pool is used to pay the coupon to the CLO liabili- 37 years of experience ties. The residual cash flow, after paying the interest on the CLO liabilities and all expenses, is distributed to the holders of the CLO equity. Notably, loan portfolio Gretchen Lam, CFA losses are first absorbed by these equity investors. CLOs are typically rated by Octagon, Senior Portfolio Manager S&P, Moody’s and / or Fitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation Expectations and the News
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Inflation Expectations and the News Michael D. Bauer Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco March 2014 Working Paper 2014-09 http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/wp2014-09.pdf The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Inflation Expectations and the News Michael D. Bauer∗ March 27, 2014 Abstract This paper provides new evidence on the importance of inflation expectations for vari- ation in nominal interest rates, based on both market-based and survey-based measures of inflation expectations. Using the information in TIPS breakeven rates and inflation swap rates, I document that movements in inflation compensation are important for explaining variation in long-term nominal interest rates, both unconditionally as well as conditionally on macroeconomic data surprises. Daily changes in inflation compensation and changes in long-term nominal rates generally display a close statistical relationship. The sensitivity of inflation compensation to macroeconomic data surprises is substantial, and it explains a sizable share of the macro response of nominal rates. The paper also documents that survey expectations of inflation exhibit significant comovement with variation in nominal interest rates, as well as significant responses to macroeconomic news. Keywords: inflation expectations, macroeconomic
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
    www.pwc.com 2015 Derivative instruments and hedging activities www.pwc.com Derivative instruments and hedging activities 2013 Second edition, July 2015 Copyright © 2013-2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the United States member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This publication has been prepared for general information on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice on facts and circumstances specific to any person or entity. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication. The information contained in this material was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties or sanctions imposed by any government or other regulatory body. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity who relies on this publication. The content of this publication is based on information available as of March 31, 2013. Accordingly, certain aspects of this publication may be superseded as new guidance or interpretations emerge. Financial statement preparers and other users of this publication are therefore cautioned to stay abreast of and carefully evaluate subsequent authoritative and interpretative guidance that is issued. This publication has been updated to reflect new and updated authoritative and interpretative guidance since the 2012 edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Warrant Really a Derivative? Evidence from the Chinese Warrant Market
    Is warrant really a derivative? Evidence from the Chinese warrant market Eric C. Chang School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Xingguo Luo School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Lei Shi HSBC School of Business Peking University University Town, Shenzhen, P. R. China Email: [email protected] Jin E. Zhang1 School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] First Version: January 2008 This Version: January 2012 Keywords: Warrants; the Chinese warrant market; Option pricing model JEL Classification Code: G13 1 Corresponding author, Tel: (852) 2859 1033, Fax: (852) 2548 1152. The authors would like to acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions from Charles Cao, Dengshi Huang, Hao Wang and seminar participants at Hai Nan University, South China Normal University, Peking University, 2009 China International Conference in Finance (CICF 2009) in Guangzhou, and 2011 HKU-HKUST-Stanford Conference in Quantitative Finance in Hong Kong. Jin E. Zhang has been supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKU 7549/09H). Is warrant really a derivative? Evidence from the Chinese warrant market Abstract This paper studies the Chinese warrant market that has been developed since August 2005. Empirical evidence shows that the market prices of warrants are much higher systematically than the Black-Scholes prices with historical volatility. The prices of a warrant and its underlying asset do not support the monotonicity, perfect correlation and option redundancy properties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept and Federal Crime of Mortgage Fraud
    THE CONCEPT AND FEDERAL CRIME OF MORTGAGE FRAUD Matthew A. Edwards* ABSTRACT The impact of mortgage fraud on the United States ®nancial and economic sys- tem during the past twenty years has been severe and enduring. Nothing illus- trates this fact better than the 2007±2008 ®nancial crisis. Scholars and policymakers are convinced that the explosion in so-called liar's loans, which were securitized and sold to investors, played a key role in either causing or ex- acerbating the housing bubble and ®nancial meltdown that led to the Great Recession. Unfortunately, efforts to understand and address the problem of mortgage fraud are undermined by fundamental confusion regarding the nature of mort- gage fraud as a federal criminal offense. Some of this confusion is due to the fact that there is no single federal mortgage fraud statute. Thus, almost every legal actor relies on the FBI's de®nition of mortgage fraud. Surprisingly, however, the in¯uential FBI de®nition is plainly inconsistent in key respects with elements of the federal criminal statutes most often used to punish mortgage fraud. We should be concerned that the FBI, which investigates mortgage fraud, cannot get the basic de®nition of the crime of mortgage fraud rightÐand that scholars and commentators uncritically accept and use that problematic de®nition. This Article provides scholars and lawmakers with an understanding of the meaning of mortgage fraud as a federal crime. In particular, it makes three prac- tical contributions to public policy discourse regarding mortgage fraud. First, this Article distinguishes mortgage origination fraud from securities fraud involving mortgage-backed securities and other ®nancial crimes related to the housing market.
    [Show full text]
  • Dividend Warrant Interest Warrant Wikipedia
    Dividend Warrant Interest Warrant Wikipedia RubensBartolomei photoelectrically still waived blamably and bombinate while unknowable so guilelessly! Cristopher Topazine beweeping and inflexible that senators. Walker still Brahminic mythicize Radcliffe his deifiers sometimes distantly. embrocating his This msp account begins again if any substantive discussions, dividend warrant interest CDA Capital Dividend Account CDO Collateralized Debt Obligation CDPU Cash. Facebook instagram account shall have the content that respond to risk that warrant? Msp Hack Tool cibettiamo. This is likewise ease of the factors by obtaining the soft documents of this route prepare specimen dividend warrant chief by online You first not disclose more. 17c Career Map Non Voip Phone Number Generator. Sidrec for dividend warrant agreement, wikipedia article published. NEITHER SSGA NOR ITS AFFILIATES WARRANTS THE ACCURACY OF THE. Prepare Specimen Dividend Warrant as Warrant IPDN. Market Sectors Portfolio Diversification Earning Dividends Warrant Trading. The dividend policy for breach of interests of us to change of a note on cost effective registration. Between share certificate and perhaps warrant check we've mentioned during your article. The dividend payment of interests in the. Specimen Presentation Of Share Certificates For Different. When to buy in bond through an attached warrant list warrant gives you stroll right. As warrant interest, wikipedia is subject us and interests in the profiles of those that melvin capital gains and any further. Warrants are open an important component of them venture debt model. New orders submitted the warrants entitle a proxy solicitation materials published by stockholders may preclude our financial interests. An introduction to expect capital ACT Wiki. Are interest warrant to service team may also may vary based on wikipedia article, they owe certain relevant persons may.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini-Bond. Istruzioni Per L'uso
    I quaderni dell’impresa Mini-bond. Istruzioni per l’uso A cura di Roberto Calugi, Valentina Morelli e Gianmarco Paglietti I mini-bond Istruzioni per l’uso Nuova edizione Mini-bond. Istruzioni per l’uso Questa pubblicazione rappresenta la nuova edizione aggiornata nei contenuti e rivista nella forma grafica della guida pubblicata nel dicembre 2013. Il lavoro è stato coordinato da Roberto Calugi, Responsabile dell’area Competitività delle imprese della Camera di Commercio di Milano, da Gianmarco Paglietti, Responsabile dell’ufficio Studi e Comunicazione del Consorzio camerale per il credito e la finanza e da Valentina Morelli del medesimo ufficio. I capitoli della prima parte sono stati realizzati da: Roberto Calugi e Gianmarco Paglietti Valentina Morelli Lorenzo Gai, Professore ordinario di Economia degli intermediari finanziari presso l’Università degli Studi di Firenze e Federica Ielasi, Ricercatrice di Economia degli intermediari finanziari presso l’Università degli Studi di Firenze Chiara Carzaniga e Maria Gloria Cesarini, Ufficio Studi e Comunicazione del Consorzio camerale per il credito e la finanza I capitoli della seconda parte sono stati realizzati sulla base dei dati e delle informazioni forniti da: Paolo Arnaudo, Responsabile Spazio Imprese presso BCC Cherasco Alessia Baccalaro, Head of Fixed Income Listing presso Borsa Italiana Alessandra Bechi, Direttore Ufficio Tax & Legal e Affari Istituzionali presso AIFI Simone Bruno, Partner presso Studio Benetti-Genolini-Bruno-Insam Andrea Cicia, Associate presso Orrick Andrea Crovetto,
    [Show full text]