DOCSLIB.ORG

Suriname 2012 PSAR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suriname 2012 PSAR 2012 Suriname 2012 PSAR October 2012 This Suriname Private Sector Assessment Report (SU-PSAR) presents an overall assessment of private sector development (PSD) and recommendations for facilitating and accelerating private investment and growth. This report includes a summary of the main characteristics and issues of the economy of Suriname as it relates to private sector development, the selection of priorities, a section on monitoring and evaluation of PSD initiatives, and finally a section with recommendations for interventions and also for filling in data gaps. The report includes two annexes the Suriname Donor Matrix (SU-DMX), and the most important sources of information currently available for the analysis of PSD. I want to thank the support, comments and suggestions of Diego Morris, Steven Hofwijks, Adriana La Valley, Marco Nicola, Paz Castillo-Ruiz, Tara Lisa Persaud and JJ Saavedra. I also want to recognize the comments and support from Vice President Robert Ameerali, and from Kenneth Foe A Man and Sieglien Burleson from the Suriname Business Forum. Finally, I want to thank all the people that were interviewed in Paramaribo that provided data, analysis and experiences that have been incorporated into this report. Carlos Elias Ph.D. Suriname PSAR Suriname Private Sector Assessment Report Table of Contents 1) Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2) Chapter I: Indentifying market failures ................................................................................... 6 a) Goal of PSD in the country and current programs ............................................................... 6 b) Overview of the economy ................................................................................................... 8 i. The domestic economy .................................................................................................... 8 ii. The international economy ............................................................................................ 14 iii. The productive structure ................................................................................................ 17 iv. The institutions .............................................................................................................. 19 c) State of the private sector .................................................................................................. 20 d) Large and fast growing sectors in the economy ................................................................ 22 e) Issues for private sector development ............................................................................... 22 i. Business supportive institutions structure ...................................................................... 23 ii. Donors and other international entities .......................................................................... 25 iii. Access to finance ....................................................................................................... 28 iv. Corporate taxation ......................................................................................................... 30 v. Business environment .................................................................................................... 32 vi. Technology and innovation ........................................................................................... 38 vii. Trade and FDI policies ............................................................................................... 40 viii. Labor regulation ......................................................................................................... 44 ix. Infrastructure, communications and energy ................................................................... 44 x. Environment .................................................................................................................. 48 xi. Gender ........................................................................................................................... 49 3) Chapter II: Selecting and prioritizing issues .......................................................................... 52 a) Priority PSD issues—improving PSD coordination .......................................................... 52 b) Priority PSD issues—improving the business climate ....................................................... 53 c) Priority PSD issues—opening space for private sector participation ................................ 54 d) Priority PSD issues—increase participation of domestic companies in the mining sector 54 e) Action plan ........................................................................................................................ 54 4) Follow-up, monitoring and evaluation .................................................................................. 55 5) Chapter III: Conclusions and recommendations .................................................................... 57 Annex 1: Sources of information used in this report .................................................................... 59 2 Suriname PSAR Annex 2: Suriname Donor Matrix Report (SU-DMX) ................................................................. 60 3 Suriname PSAR 1) Introduction The main result from the analysis presented in this report, and its common thread, is the identification that the greatest challenge for private sector growth and development is the poor business environment that limits the creation and growth of private sector enterprises. The weakness of the private sector is related to the strength of the public sector that employs about 60% of total employment and participates in many sectors in the economy, including among others financial services, transport, and agriculture. From a sector perspective, mining is the engine of growth of the economy and largely funds the public sector. Simplifying the growth process: in Suriname economic growth results from the transmission of resources from exports of gold, oil and bauxite, to government, and from government to the rest of the economy via public spending. In this overall context the domestic private sector is small and its economic activities are mostly limited to the provision of non-tradable goods and services, most notably in commerce. It is important to clarify that the mining sector behaves as an enclave as it is dominated by large multinational corporations with few links to the rest of the economy. Importantly for this report, there are no large and fast growing sectors, with the exception of mining, because the private sector is underdeveloped. Although some export oriented economic activities exist and there is some industrial production, in the aggregate these activities and industries are small. This report, therefore, notes that to facilitate private sector growth it is necessary to facilitate the expansion of the private sector into all areas of economic activity by improving the business climate and reducing over time the presence of the state in the economy. Throughout this report, this is called to open space for the expansion of private sector domestic and export oriented activities. It is also important to highlight that the analysis presented in this report is limited by the availability of data. All efforts have been made to back findings and analysis using available data, however, in many cases a subjective interpretation was necessary to prepare this report and to identify priorities. For this reason important recommendations included in this report relate to filling in data and information gaps. Therefore, this Suriname Private Sector Assessment Report (SU-PSAR) presents an overall assessment of private sector development (PSD) and recommendations for facilitating and accelerating private economic investment and growth.1 Following the suggestion of the guidelines for the preparation of Donor Coordination Matrices (DMX) for CARIFORUM countries, the SU-PSAR includes as an annex the Suriname Donor Matrix (SU-DMX). This introduction presents a brief description of the purpose of the PSAR and DMX, and explains their purpose and how they complement each other. It is important to note that this report would need to be updated over time as the overall economic conditions change, new PSD programs and projects are implemented, new actors enter or leave the market, and data gaps are filled in with primary data and analysis. It is recommended that this report is updated every two years, or less if conditions change significantly. 1 This report is funded by Compete Caribbean, which is a program created to facilitate Private Sector Development (PSD) in CARIFORUM countries and sponsored by DFID, CIDA and the IDB. 4 Suriname PSAR According to the PSAR guidelines the PSAR is: “a report meant to provide a comprehensive framework to identify market failures concerning the development of the private sector and prioritize them in terms of their need for an urgent solution. These outcomes are the result of a process that involves the use of descriptive and analytical tools to assess the state of the private sector and the economy as a whole, as well as consulting with firms in strategic sectors of the economy to prioritize issues. The PSAR can be decomposed in two big parts: first, it compiles and analyzes information from different sources in order to provide a snapshot of the state of the private sector in the country, and second, it brings the information to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Essays on an Emerging Financial Market a Case Study of Suriname
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository Essays on an Emerging Financial Market A case study of Suriname Essays over een opkomende financiële markt Een case studie van Suriname PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof.dr. H.A.P. Pols en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op vrijdag 25 september 2015 om 13.30 uur door Denice Samantha Bodeutsch geboren te Nickerie, Suriname Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr. Ph.H.B.F. Franses Overige leden: Prof.dr. D.J.C. van Dijk Prof.dr. A. de Jong Dr. S.T.M. Straetmans Summary Stock markets in emerging economies are often viewed as a source of financial development and ultimately economic growth. Well-operating or efficient stock markets may contribute to the development of a country’s financial sector through increase in savings, efficient allocation of capital to the most profitable investments and improved use of the existing resources. Efficiency of stock markets is especially important for countries with developing economies as these countries aim to catch up with global economic growth. For countries with emerging economies to benefit from equity financing, it is important that their stock exchanges at least pass the lowest level of market efficiency, that is, weak-form efficiency. This implies that existing stock prices reflect all information about historical prices and trading volumes. Emerging economies share common features in particular with respect to their financial sector where the banking system dominates in raising finance, while stock markets are relatively less important (indirect versus direct finance).
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Guide
    SURINAME INVESTMENT GUIDE Where Business equals Quality of Life INVESTMENT GUIDE SURINAME Where Business equals Quality of Life INVESTMENT GUIDE SURINAME Where Business equals Quality of Life PREFACE In the last number of years, Suriname made significant steps to integrate its economy into the globalizing world economy. By becoming a member of the Caribbean Community in 1995, a process started which included regulatory reforms and trade liberalization with the purpose of modernizing the economy and cutting red tape. In 2004, the country was able to reach a positive trade balance. For decades, the US and The Netherlands were significant trading partners of Suriname. Regional integration is an important policy aspect of the current Government which took office in August of 2010. By following a conscious strategy of integrating into non traditional markets and participating in the South American integration process, the country is opening doors to investors who will see opportunities in mining, a wide range of services, agriculture, cultural diversity, communications and value added products. By deepening the relationship with traditional trading partners with investment modalities and implementing a South South strategy with nontraditional partners, the economy of Suriname is being transformed into an emerging market. Suriname is a unique and safe place with the natural resources and geological characteristics of South America, the warmth of the Caribbean, a cultural diversity found nowhere else, and a constantly improving investment and business climate. The Government makes serious effort to make Suriname a better place do to business and will treat all investors alike, according to the Most Favorite Nation principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Survey of the Caribbean 2014 Reduced Downside Risks and Better Prospects for a Recovery
    ISSN 1727-9917 eclac subregional studies and headquarters SERIES PERSPECTIves for the caribbean Economic survey of the Caribbean 2014 Reduced downside risks and better prospects for a recovery Dillon Alleyne Michael Hendrickson Sheldon McLean Michael Milligan Kohei Yoshida Machel Pantin Nyasha Skerrette 39 Economic survey of the Caribbean 2014 Reduced downside risks and better prospects for a recovery Dillon Alleyne Michael Hendrickson Sheldon McLean Michael Milligan Kohei Yoshida Machel Pantin Nyasha Skerrette This document has been prepared under the supervision of Dillon Alleyne, Coordinator of the Economic Development Unit, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean subregional headquarters for the Caribbean, with the assistance of Michael Hendrickson, Sheldon McLean, Michael Milligan and Kohei Yoshida, Economic Affairs Officers, and Machel Pantin and Nyasha Skerrette, Research Assistants. The views expressed in this document, which has been reproduced without formal editing, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Organization. United Nations publication ISSN 1727-9917 LC/L.3917 LC/CAR/L.450 Copyright © United Nations, October 2014. All rights reserved. Printed at United Nations, Santiago, Chile. Member States and their governmental institutions may reproduce this work without prior authorization, but are requested to mention the source and inform the United Nations of such reproduction. ECLAC – Studies and Perspectives Series – The Caribbean – No. 39 Economic survey of the Caribbean
    [Show full text]
  • OCCASION This Publication Has Been Made Available to the Public on The
    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26026-0 · www.unido.org · [email protected] D istr. LIME TED UNID0/IS.184 28 October 1980 UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ENGLISH COUNTOY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROFILE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SURINAME* Prepared by the Division for Industrial Studies This document has been reproduced without formal ed itin g .
    [Show full text]
  • Activities of Suriname Relating to the Agenda Item 17 *
    UNITED NATIONS Working Paper GROUP OF EXPERTS ON No. 35 GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES Twenty-fifth session Nairobi, 5–12 May 2009 Item 17 of the provisional agenda Activities relating to the Working Group on the Promotion of the Recording and Use of Indigenous, Minority and Regional Language Group Geographical Names Activities of Suriname Relating to the Agenda Item 17 * * Prepared by Hein Raghoebar (Suriname). Index 1 The Provisional Agenda 17 of Suriname 2. Map functions 2.1 Location and image of Suriname 2.2 The economy of Suriname 2.3 The cultural diversity of Suriname 3. The cartographic history of Suriname 3.1 The approach of the concept place in Suriname 3.1.1. Descriptive or ideographic sense of place 3.1.2. Social construct of place 3.1.3. Phenomenological sense of place 4. Ethnonym of Suriname 4.1 Autonyms of ethnic groups 4.2 Esconyms of ethnic groups 5. Toponomy of Suriname 5.1 Suriname and the Guyana Shield 5.2.The Country name Suriname 5.3 The town Paramaribo 6. Regionalisation 6.1 Regionalisation of Suriname’s territory 6.2 The region of the plantations 6.3 Region Central Suriname Nature Reserve (C.S.N.R.) 7. Toponyms division of natural features 7.1 Names of places to local characteristics 7.2 Toponyms derived from important events 7.3 Toponyms of hills and peaks 7.4 Toponyms derived from European discovery and conquest 7.5 Toponyms derived from other cases 2 Suriname, Paramaribo 16 March 2009 Flag Coat of arms Republic of Suriname Republiek Suriname 1. Provisional agenda 17 of Suriname The government of Suriname appreciates it that she is permitted to participate in the conference of the United Nations Groups of Experts in Geographical Names.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Venezuela and the Guianas
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A SECTION 3 Venezuela and TEKS 1A, 1B, 2B, 4A, the Guianas 15A, 15B, 18A What You Will Learn… If YOU lived there... Main Ideas You’ve come from your home in eastern Venezuela to visit the near- 1. Spanish settlement shaped by country of Suriname. Your visit is full of surprises. As you walk the history and culture of along the streets of the country’s capital, Paramaribo, people are Venezuela. 2. Oil production plays a large not speaking Spanish, but Dutch, English, and some languages you role in Venezuela’s economy don’t even recognize. You see Hindu temples and Muslim mosques and government today. 3. The Guianas have diverse alongside Christian churches. cultures and plentiful resources. Why is Suriname so different from Venezuela? The Big Idea European settlement, immi- gration, and natural resources BUILDING BACKGROUND Venezuela, like Colombia, was once a have greatly influenced the cul- Spanish colony, but the Guianas were colonized by other nations— ture and economy of Venezuela Great Britain, the Netherlands, and France. When these countries and the Guianas. gained independence, British Guiana became Guyana and Dutch Guiana became Suriname. Key Terms and Places llaneros, p. 246 Lake Maracaibo, p. 246 Caracas, p. 247 History and Culture of Venezuela strike, p. 248 Venezuela was originally the home of many small tribes of South referendum, p. 248 American Indians. Those groups were conquered by the Span- ish in the early 1500s. Though Venezuela became independent from Spain in the early 1800s, those three centuries of Spanish rule shaped the country’s history and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews -Louis Allaire, Samuel M. Wilson, Hispaniola: Caribbean Chiefdoms in the Age of Columbus
    Book Reviews -Louis Allaire, Samuel M. Wilson, Hispaniola: Caribbean chiefdoms in the age of Columbus. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1990. xi + 170 pp. -Douglas Melvin Haynes, Philip D. Curtin, Death by migration: Europe's encounter with the tropical world in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. xviii + 251 pp. -Dale Tomich, J.H. Galloway, The sugar cane industry: An historical geography from its origins to 1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. xii + 266 pp. -Myriam Cottias, Dale Tomich, Slavery in the circuit of sugar: Martinique and the world economy, 1830 -1848. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1990. xiv + 352 pp. -Robert Forster, Pierre Dessalles, La vie d'un colon à la Martinique au XIXe siècle. Pré-senté par Henri de Frémont. Courbevoie: s.n., 1984-1988, four volumes, 1310 pp. -Hilary Beckles, Douglas V. Armstrong, The old village and the great house: An archaeological and historical examination of Drax Hall Plantation, St Ann's Bay, Jamaica. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1990. xiii + 393 pp. -John Stewart, John A. Lent, Caribbean popular culture. Bowling Green OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1990. 157 pp. -W. Marvin Will, Susanne Jonas ,Democracy in Latin America: Visions and realities. New York: Bergin This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com10/03/2021 11:49:37PM via free access BOOK REVIEWS Hispaniola: Caribbean Chiefdoms in the Age of Columbus. SAMUEL M. WILSON. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1990. xi +170 pp. (Paper US$ 19.95) Louis ALLAIRE Department of Anthropology The University of Manitoba Winnipeg MB, R3T 2N2, Canada This recent ethnohistorical account of the last days of the native chiefdoms of the Caribbean is a welcome and serious addition to the current plethora of publications commemorating the Columbus Quincentennial, only too often from the pen of improvised Caribbeanists.
    [Show full text]
  • Artikel Zunder
    Academic Journal of Suriname 2011, 2, 150 - 167 Social Sciences Full-length paper A new look on the economic history of Suriname* including a methodology to calculate reparations for damage caused by Dutch colonial rule. Armand Zunder Abstract Suriname was created by design by merchant bankers and members of the Dutch elite in the Dutch Government, the elite in the City of Amsterdam and the elite of the other major Cities at that time. All services to produce and sell the commodities would be supplied by the merchant bankers. The Dutch elite in the Central Government and City Governments profited indirectly from the Colony by gathering taxes from the merchant bankers. Besides this employment opportunities were created in the harbours and other locations, all related to the original business from Suriname. During the period of the plantation-economy the amount of goods shipped from Suriname amounted to 1.763.442.000 florins, of which around 76% was shipped to the Netherlands (mainly Amsterdam). The remaining 24% was shipped to England and the USA. The net present value of the goods imported in the Netherlands in the period 1683-1939 amounts to €. 126 billion at year end 2006. People were enslaved on the African West coast and shipped to Suriname to work on plantation estates. Meanwhile production took place under circumstances of extreme Human Rights abuses, where Mental Slavery was also systematically practised as a tool of total control towards the enslaved. Following the Durban conference 1 I published a book on reparations. In this book a methodology to calculate reparations in the Suriname case was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • WT/TPR/M/391 23 October 2019 (19-6960) Page
    WT/TPR/M/391 23 October 2019 (19-6960) Page: 1/36 Trade Policy Review Body 11 and 13 September 2019 TRADE POLICY REVIEW SURINAME MINUTES OF THE MEETING Chairperson: H.E. Mr. Manuel A.J. Teehankee (Philippines) CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS BY THE CHAIRPERSON ....................................................... 2 2 OPENING STATEMENT BY THE REPRESENTATIVE OF SURINAME .................................. 4 3 STATEMENT BY THE DISCUSSANT .............................................................................. 11 4 STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS ........................................................................................ 15 5 REPLIES BY THE REPRESENTATIVE OF SURINAME AND ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ..... 29 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS BY THE CHAIRPERSON ......................................................... 35 Note: Advance written questions and additional questions by WTO Members, and the replies provided by Suriname are reproduced in document WT/TPR/M/391/Add.1 and will be available online at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp_rep_e.htm. WT/TPR/M/391 • Suriname - 2 - 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS BY THE CHAIRPERSON 1.1. The third Trade Policy Review of Suriname was held on 11 and 13 September 2019. The Chairperson, H.E. Mr. Manuel Teehankee (Philippines), welcomed the delegation of Suriname, headed by H.E. Mr. Stephen Tsang, Minister of Trade, Industry and Tourism; H.E. Mr. Reggy Nelson, Permanent Representative of Suriname to the WTO; the rest of the delegation; and the discussant, H.E. Mr. Peter Brño (Slovak Republic). 1.2. The Chairperson informed Members that as stated in the Addendum to the Airgram for this meeting (WTO/AIR/TPR/89), the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) had requested to attend, as an ad hoc observer, the upcoming Trade Policy Review of Peru. Thus, if there were no objections, he suggested that Members granted UNIDO observer status for this meeting, and accordingly invited the representative of UNIDO to participate in Peru's TPR meeting, as had been done in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Group Current Situation and Prospects
    ReportNo. 48'oCCRG CaribbeanGroup CurrentSituation and Prospects January5, 1984 Public Disclosure Authorized LatinAmerica and the ( arihbeanRegional Office FOR OFFICIAL. USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Thisdocument has a restricteddistribution and may be used by recipients Public Disclosure Authorized only in the performanceof their officia; duties.its contentsmay not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bankauthorization. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. THE ECONOMIC SITUATION in 1982-83 ......................... 1 It. REGIONAL PROGRAMS ... ....... ............ 4 A. Energy ..............*.*... .......... a.a........*....a....*..........4 B.- Agriculture........ C. Tourism ................**... *....... 66....**...** D. Private Sector Development ............................ 7 E. Export Promotion *.................................... 8 F. Transportation..................... a......a..e..e. 10 G. Regional Payments Support Fund ........................ 11 II1 . THE OECS COUNTRIES . .****..............#*.. L2 A. The Inter-Agency Resident Mission ..................... 12 B. The Staffing Gap .......aa.aaa.a. aaaaaaaaaa... aaa. *a .. 12 C. The East Caribbean Central Bank ....................... 13 IV. EXTERNAL FINANCING ..................... 15 V. FUTURE CGCED ACTIVITIES ....... ...... .... ........ e 19 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Country Notes .aaa... ...... ....... *...... 20 2. Statistical Appendix ...... .... .... ...... 27 This document has a restricted distribution and
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED WT/TPR/S/282 22 April 2013
    RESTRICTED WT/TPR/S/282 22 April 2013 (13-2056) Page: 1/78 Trade Policy Review Body TRADE POLICY REVIEW REPORT BY THE SECRETARIAT SURINAME This report, prepared for the second Trade Policy Review of Suriname, has been drawn up by the WTO Secretariat on its own responsibility. The Secretariat has, as required by the Agreement establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization), sought clarification from Suriname on its trade policies and practices. Any technical questions arising from this report may be addressed to Messrs John Finn (tel: 022/739 5081), Michael Kolie (tel: 022/739 5931), and Bernard Kuiten (tel: 022/739 5676). Document WT/TPR/G/282 contains the policy statement submitted by Suriname. Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the first session of the meeting of the Trade Policy Review Body on Suriname. This report was drafted in English. WT/TPR/S/282 • Suriname - 2 - CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 6 1 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................... 8 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Recent Economic Developments.................................................................................. 10 1.3 Developments in Trade .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SURINAME: Rural Sector Note ______
    #!2-023"'#1 30*#!2-0-2# -0*",)--.#02'4# 0-%0++# #2',+#0'!,"2&#0' #,#04'!# ,4#1+#,2#,20#&'4'1'-, SURINAME: Rural Sector Note _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This Rural Sector Note was prepared by an FAO Investment Centre mission (Paolo Lucani), within the framework of the FAO/World Bank Cooperative Programme. In FAO the Study was coordinated and supervised by Selim Mohor, Chief of the Latin America and the Caribbean Service of the Investment Centre Division. It is based on an exhaustive review of available literature on the subject including documentation from the Surinamese Government, multilateral and bilateral donors and agencies and a field visit in February 2005 to discuss issues and options with Government officials and institutions involved in the agricultural sector. The findings and conclusions presented in the report are the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of FAO or the World Bank. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]