Greater Manchester

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greater Manchester Rochdale Town Centre, Rochdale, Greater Manchester Archaeological Desk- based Assessment Oxford Archaeology North June 2009 The Rochdale Development Agency Issue No: 2009-10/954 OA North Job No: L10144 NGR: SD 89849 13536 Rochdale Town Centre, Rochdale, Greater Manchester: Desk-based Assessment 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................7 1.1 Circumstances of Project.....................................................................................7 1.2 Location, Topography and Geology....................................................................7 2. METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................9 2.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................9 2.2 Desk-based Assessment ......................................................................................9 2.3 Site Visit............................................................................................................10 2.4 Archive..............................................................................................................10 3. BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................11 3.1 Historical and Archaeological Background ......................................................11 3.2 Development of the Study Area........................................................................16 3.3 Conservation Areas...........................................................................................31 3.4 Previous Geotechnical Work.............................................................................31 4. GAZETTEER OF SITES ..............................................................................................33 5. SITE INSPECTION AND BUILDING ASSESSMENT ......................................................79 5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................79 5.2 Buildings on Yorkshire Street...........................................................................81 5.3 Buildings on Baillie Street ................................................................................90 5.4 The Butts and Northern Part of Town Hall Conservation Area........................94 5.5 Buildings on Smith Street .................................................................................98 5.6 Other Buildings.................................................................................................94 6 S IGNIFICANCE OF THE REMAINS ............................................................................101 6.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................101 6.2 Criteria.............................................................................................................101 6.3 Significance.....................................................................................................106 7. L IKELY IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................107 7.1 Impact..............................................................................................................107 7.2 Impact Assessment..........................................................................................109 8. R ECOMMENDATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION ................................115 8.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................115 For the use of The Rochdale Development Agency © OA North: June 2009 Rochdale Town Centre, Rochdale, Greater Manchester: Desk-based Assessment 2 8.2 Archaeological Mitigation ..............................................................................115 9. B IBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................117 9.1 Cartographic and Primary Sources..................................................................117 9.2 Secondary Sources ..........................................................................................119 APPENDIX 1: P ROJECT BRIEF ....................................................................................121 ILLUSTRATIONS ..........................................................................................................125 Figures.........................................................................................................................125 For the use of The Rochdale Development Agency © OA North: June 2009 Rochdale Town Centre, Rochdale, Greater Manchester: Desk-based Assessment 3 SUMMARY In April 2009, The Rochdale Development Agency (RDA) commissioned Oxford Archaeology North (OA North) to undertake an archaeological desk-based assessment of approximately 9ha of land on the eastern side of Rochdale town centre (centred on NGR SD 89849 13536). The aim of the desk-based assessment is to provide supporting documentation for a development brief being devised by Rochdale Development Agency for a large scale redevelopment of the area. The desk-based assessment comprised a search of both published and unpublished records held by the Greater Manchester Archaeology Unit Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) in Manchester; the Local Studies Centre at Touchstones, Rochdale, and the archives and library held at OA North. In addition, a site visit was carried out in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the study area, and assess the significance of the built heritage. The assessment identified a total of 99 sites of archaeological interest within the study area. This included five Grade II Listed Buildings (Sites 17 , 18 , 20 , 38 and 91 ), and four sites recorded in the SMR (Sites 03 , 04 , 90 and 92 ). The remaining 87 sites were identified through the consultation of historic maps. There are two Conservation Areas within the study area, Town Head, at its northern extent, and Town Hall at its western extent. Standing buildings within these areas include Sites 15 , 20 , 38 and 60 - 62 in the Town Head Conservation Area, and Sites 17 , 27 , 29 -33 , 80 and 82 -88 in the Town Hall Conservation Area. The site visit confirmed that there are numerous buildings of historical interest in the study area, spanning the Georgian to Edwardian periods. The majority of these buildings lie within the two Conservation Areas, in the western part of the study area and along Yorkshire Street, although other buildings of historical importance survive on Baillie Street and Smith Street. There are no sites of prehistoric or Roman date within the study area, which would suggest that the potential for sites of this date is low. However, this may be due to a lack of previous archaeological work in Rochdale, rather than an absence of such sites. Similarly, there are no known medieval sites within the study area, although it seems probable that The Butts would have formed part of any medieval settlement focussed on the crossing point of the River Roch. The property divisions in this part of the study area, moreover, and the narrow thoroughfares linking Yorkshire Street with The Butts, are potentially of medieval origin. In addition, the Roch Bridge (Site 92 ) dates from c 1600, and represents an old crossing point of the River Roch. This area therefore has some potential for significant archaeological remains of medieval date. Rochdale’s urban centre is of relatively recent growth, commencing in earnest during the seventeenth century. An important element in the growth of Rochdale during this period was an expansion of the local woollen industry, and the associated trans- Pennine trade in woollen goods. The significance of this trade is reflected in the numerous fine eamples of Georgian merchant’s houses, warehouses and inns that survive in the Yorkshire Street area, which was essentially the terminus of the trade route across the Pennines before the inception of the canal and railway links. For the use of The Rochdale Development Agency © OA North: June 2009 Rochdale Town Centre, Rochdale, Greater Manchester: Desk-based Assessment 4 By the late nineteenth century, the area behind the older thoroughfares, and the traditional commercial area of The Butts and Yorkshire Street had been infilled with industries and housing. To the east of The Butts the area was dominated by woollen mills owned by Kelsall and Kemp, who were based at Butts Mill (Site 01 ). At various times Kelsall and Kemp also occupied other mills in the immediate vicinity (Sites 02 - 04 ). Much of the housing situated to the east of these mills would have been erected to house the large numbers of people that these mills employed. Alongside these residential areas were community and recreational buildings including chapels or churches (Sites 36 , 10 and 05 ), a Sunday school (Site 06 ), schools (Sites 16 , 09 and 34 ), a public baths (Site 07 ), a public hall (Site 11 ), and several inns (Sites 08 , 12 -15 , 22 , 26 , 27 , 31 and 35 ), combining to form an urban industrial townscape that characterised many nineteenth-century towns in Lancashire. Further industrial
Recommended publications
  • Rochdale News July 2005 Page 1
    ROCHDALE FREENews Save our Vital Services! The new MP for Rochdale, Paul Rowen, Maternity and Child Care gets a big hug from Mum How must stay in Rochdale Rochdale aul Rowen MP and future of these vital services. The encouraging everybody to take Voted Rochdale Liberal Government talk about investing part in this consultation - I will in the P Democrats are calling more in the National Health be telling them to keep their Paul for the future of Child Care Service – and here we have what hands off our services - staff 2005 and Maternity Services to be is basically a cost cutting exercise. morale at the Infirmary is at an Rowen MP General guaranteed. This is in the light There is no better investment all time low, this is another kick Labour of a controversial review that than in our children’s lives, we in the teeth everybody involved.” Lib Dem Election has been announced that were told 2 years ago that these Rochdale Liberal Democrat 41.1% 40.0% could put the future of our services will continue in Rochdale Leader - Cllr. Alan Taylor said, “If services under threat. - we have saved them once and we stand together we can send a Conservative NHS Bosses have threatened to we will do again.” clear message to NHS bosses that 10.5% dramatically slash the number of Kingsway Resident - Annette Child and Maternity Services are hospitals in Greater Manchester Foster said, “This really is a bolt so important. We are worried that - that provide Child Care and from the blue - I believe it is to if we lose these services the Maternity Services from 13 to do with staff shortages across residents of Rochdale will have to between 6 and 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St
    Locality Church Name Parish County Diocese Date Grant reason ACCRINGTON School Chapel ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Mary Magdalene ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1897-1904 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Paul, Barnfield ACCRINGTON, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Peter ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1885-1889 New Church ALTHAM St. James ALTHAM Lancashire Manchester 1858-1859 Enlargement ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE Christ Church ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1858-1860 Repairs ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE St. Peter ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, St. Peter Lancashire Manchester 1934-1935 Repairs AUDENSHAW St. Hilda AUDENSHAW, St. Hilda Lancashire Manchester 1936-1938 New Church BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1854-1874 Rebuild BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1878-1884 Rebuild BAMBER BRIDGE St. Saviour BAMBER BRIDGE Lancashire Manchester 1869-1870 Enlargement BARROW-IN-FURNESS Mission Church WHALLEY, St. Mary Lancashire Manchester 1891 New Church BELFIELD St. Anne MILNROW, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church BENCHILL St. Luke the Physician BENCHILL Lancashire Manchester 1937-1939 New Church BIRCH St. Mary BIRCH Lancashire Manchester 1951-1952 Repairs BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD St. Michael, Bamford BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD, St. Michael, Bamford Lancashire Manchester 1883-1885 New Church BLACKBURN Mission Church BLACKBURN, All Saints Lancashire Manchester 1881 New Church BLACKBURN School Chapel BLACKBURN, St. Paul Lancashire Manchester 1876 Other BLACKBURN St. Bartholomew, Ewood LIVESEY, St. Andrew Lancashire Manchester 1908-1911 New Church BLACKBURN St. James BLACKBURN, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1872-1874 New Church BLACKBURN St.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30Th September 2016
    Economy Directorate Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Number One Riverside, Smith Street Rochdale, OL16 1XU EMAIL: [email protected] Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30th September 2016 Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01180/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 29 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00009/AM LOCATION: St Cuthberts Rc Business And Enterprise College Shaw Road Rochdale OL16 4RX APPLICANT: AGENT: Mr Michael Flinders frankshaw associates Penmore House Hasland Road Hasland Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 05J Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ 16/01150/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 22 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00325/FUL LOCATION: 16 The Strand Rochdale OL11 2JG APPLICANT: AGENT: Miss Maddi Mooney Triangle Architects Emma Carlin Great Places Housing Group Raven House 729 Princess Road 113 Fairfield Street Manchester Manchester M20 2LT M12 6EL United Kingdom Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01079/HOUS Balderstone
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Report 2019 Introduction
    IMPACT REPORT 2019 INTRODUCTION • Mission Statement • Improving peoples’ lives across our community through the power of sport • Respect • Opportunities for all • Caring • Health & wellbeing • Diversity • Ambitious • Life changing • Empowering Rochdale AFC Community Sports Trust works in partnership with Rochdale AFC to provide all members of the local community with the opportunity to access quality sport provision whatever their age, gender or ethnicity. We aim to increase participation in schools, improve health and wellbeing, while developing programmes that engage the whole of the community using football as the driving force. PARTNERSHIPS ■i®i!Ji � Premier '11League EFL TRUST Rochdale Rochdale Youth Service Boroughwide Housing ,.. (j)DALE SUPP□RTERS Level Playing Field � TRAIELSAFE T R U S T www.llfflplaylngfltld.org.uk -L Link4Life PARTNERSHIP _,..,, :1TOUT EFL TACKLING RACISM& DISCRIMINATION TRUST SPORT{?, FUTSAL ENGLAND PROJECT ACTIVITIES • SCHOOLS PROGRAMME - Intensive Week/PPA/Lunch Clubs/After school coaching/Match Day Visits/ EFL Trust Kids Cup & Girls Under 13’s Cup • SOCIAL INCLUSION – Premier League Kicks/Ability Counts/Open Arms/ Estates/Asylum seekers & refugees/Community Cohesion Programme • DISABILITY PROVISION – Schools/Under 16’s/Adults • HEALTH – Dale’s Silver 60s’/MIND/Walking Football • EDUCATION – Futsal BTEC Scholarship/NCS/Internship/Primary Stars/ Numeracy & Respect • MATCH DAY ACTIVITIES – Mascots/Birthday Parties/Half time events • SPORTS PARTICIPATION – Holiday courses/Weekend Clubs/Futsal/ Birthday Parties/Festivals/Open
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 Linked Dataset
    Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 linked dataset 1 Contents SAMPLE: Sample identifier 12 SERIAL: Household index number 12 SEQ: Index to distinguish between copies of households with multiple primary links 12 PERNUM: Person index within household 13 LINKTYPE: Link type 13 LINKWT: Number of cases in linkable population represented by linked case 13 NAMELAST: Last name 13 NAMEFRST: First name 13 AGE: Age 14 AGEMONTH: Age in months 14 BPLCNTRY: Country of birth 14 BPLCTYGB: County of birth, Britain 20 CFU: CFU index number 22 CFUSIZE: Number of people in individuals CFU 23 CNTRY: Country of residence 23 CNTRYGB: Country within Great Britain 24 COUNTYGB: County, Britain 24 ELDCH: Age of eldest own child in household 27 FAMSIZE: Number of own family members in household 27 FAMUNIT: Family unit membership 28 FARM: Farm, NAPP definition 29 GQ: Group quarters 30 HEADLOC: Location of head in household 31 2 HHWT: Household weight 31 INACTVGB: Adjunct occupational code (Inactive), Britain 31 LABFORCE: Labor force participation 51 MARRYDAU: Number of married female off-spring in household 51 MARRYSON: Number of married male off-spring in household 51 MARST: Marital status 52 MIGRANT: Migration status 52 MOMLOC: Mothers location in household 52 NATIVITY: Nativity 53 NCHILD: Number of own children in household 53 NCHLT10: Number of own children under age 10 in household 53 NCHLT5: Number of own children under age 5 in household 54 NCOUPLES: Number of married couples in household 54 NFAMS: Number of families in household 54 NFATHERS: Number of fathers
    [Show full text]
  • The WEA in Manchester.Indd
    wea.org.uk The WEA in Greate Manchester combined Littleborough authority Ramsbottom Milnrow Bury Horwich Rochdale Bolton Bury Crompton Bolton Rochdale Oldham Middleton Saddleworth Wigan Oldham Wigan Atherton Prestwich Worsley Mossley Tydesley Ashton Salford under-lyne Manchester Leigh Salford Droysden Tameside Stretford Irlam Denton Manchester Trafford Stockport Stockport Marple Altrincham Cheadle & Gatley Hale The WEA is a charity registered in England and Wales (no. 1112775) and in Scotland (no. SC039239). The WEA in Greater Manchester combined authority ADAB Creative Living Centre Prestwich Manchester Cathedral St James the Apostle All Saints Church Hall Crossley Centre Manchester Chinese Centre St Johns Centre All Saints Hale Barns with Ringway Parish Deeplish Community Centre Mayo Building St Mary and the Baum Church Church Deeplish Primary Academy Meadowfields Community and Children~s St Mary Magdalene Church Centre Altrincham Methodist Church Centre Denton Methodist church St Peter~s Church Apna Ghar Daycare Centre (KYP) Mechanics Institute Each Step St Peters Primary School Ashfield Valley Primary Methodist Church Cheadle Hulme East Didsbury Methodist Church St Phillips with St Stephens Ashton Central Library, Old Street Mind Wellbeing Centre Edge Lane Methodist Church STAG HQ (South Trafford Archaeological AVANTA Oldham Monton Memorial Hall Group) Falinge Community Hubb Bangladeshi Womens Organisation NEESA Woodville Community Resource Unit Sudden Community Centre Fallowfield Library Befriending Asylum Seekers and Refugees Old
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter II Normans and Plantagenets
    Chapter Two NORMANS AND PLANTAGENETS : 1086-1485 THE DOMESDAY BOOK . OCHDALE'S written history begins in 1086, when William the Conqueror sent his men all over England to find out how much land was being cultivated and how much revenue he might expect R to collect : the result was the Domesday (or Doomsday) Book, so called because of its uncompromising thoroughness and detail . Its two volumes, written in crabbed Latin, with words occasionally scored through in red for emphasis, instead of being underlined, are now displayed at the Public Record Office, London . One can imagine the difficulties of the Norman inspectors : how unwillingly and in what various dialects the English land-holders gave their answers when the " day of reckoning " came upon them . Perhaps this may account for the fact that "Rochdale" is set down as " Recedham ." It was probably then, as we still hear it today, pro- rounced as " Ratchda ' " with a long " a," and a soft Cheshire " c." Very freely translated and abbreviated, this is the gist of the Domesday entry concerning Rochdale as it was in the time of Edward the Confessor (1042-1066), excluding such details as the King's personal property and lands in the Salford Hundred : King Edward held Salford . To this Hundred belonged 21 manors held by as many thanes ; in which there were 112 hides and 102 carucates of land . Camel, a tenant of 2 of these hides in Recedham, was free of all customs but these six : theft, housebreaking, premeditated assault, breach of the peace, not answering the reeve's summons, and 1 4 ROCHDALE RETROSPECT continuing a fight after swearing on oath to desist .
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 322 LOCAL GOVERNirfKHT BOUNDARY COAIMISSIOH FOR ENGLA1ID REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison PH To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROCHDALE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan borough of Rochdale in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Rochdale Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies. 3. Rochdale Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitchen Street, Rochdale: an Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment
    Kitchen Street, Rochdale: An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment. Report By: Vicky Nash & Dr Michael Nevell Centre for Applied Archaeology CUBE University of Salford 113-115 Portland Street Manchester M1 6DW Tel: 0161 295 3821 Email: [email protected] Contents Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology Statement 4 3. The Setting 5 4. Archaeological & Historical Background 7 5. Gazetteer of Sites 13 6. Significance of the Remains 18 7. Impact of the Development 22 8. Recommendations for Mitigation 26 9. Sources 27 Appendix 1: Figures 30 Appendix 2: Photographic Archive 42 Kitchen Street, Rochdale: An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Page | 1 Report Number 09/2010 Summary The Centre for Applied Archaeology (CfAA) was commissioned by The Regenda Housing Group to carry out an archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of a proposed development on the land bounded by Kitchen Street, Ramsey Street and the rear properties facing South Court, Rochdale ( SD 9022 1365). The study area contains potential archaeological remains of the 19th and 20th centuries. These remains belong to four main types of activity: the tanning factory (sites 1a to 1d, early to mid-19th century); the remains of workers’ housing (sites 3a, 3b and 9, 19th century); the church mission (sites 11a and 11b, early to mid-20th century) and the nursery (site 13, mid- to late 20th century). None of the potential remains within the study area are considered to have national significance. However the study area does contain potential remains of regional and local significance, which will be destroyed by the proposed development and will therefore require appropriate recording to be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochdale Township Green Infrastructure Action Plan Draft: May 2013
    Rochdale Township Green Infrastructure Action Plan draft: May 2013 Contents: Chapter 1 Why a Green Infrastructure Plan for Rochdale 1 Township? Chapter 2 What is Green Infrastructure? 4 Chapter 3 Policy Context for Green Infrastructure in Rochdale 10 Township Chapter 4 What do we want Green Infrastructure in Rochdale 12 Township to do? Chapter 5 Green Infrastructure in Rochdale Township by Area 19 Chapter 6 Green Infrastructure Objectives for Rochdale 53 Township Chapter 7 Key Partnerships for Delivery 66 Appendix Policy Context 68 Glossary & Abbreviations 70 Further References and links (Text to be finalised) Chapter 1: Why a Green Infrastructure Plan for Rochdale Township? Introduction Rochdale Township is home to the largest proportion of the borough’s population and is the main centre for shopping, services, leisure, local government and employment within the Borough. It has a strong sense of identity with distinct ambitions to create sustainable communities for its people, environment and economy. The quality of the environment including its green spaces, watercourses and surrounding countryside is important in shaping how the Township is perceived and experienced both by residents and visitors, along with potential investors. The environment is also part of the essential infrastructure for the Township, Borough and beyond including the core of Greater Manchester. This Action Plan sets out Rochdale Township’s particular green infrastructure assets and a series of key objectives and projects to ensure that their value to the Township is fully realised in supporting economic growth, community health and well being and a sustainable environment which can help address the impacts of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • (Including the "Infra" Wills) Now Preserved in the Probate
    THE RECORD SOCIETY FOR THE $uMtcation of OMøraai Bømtnrate RELATING TO LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIR] FHl TITI 239 VOLUME LXX VII I. By i 1 Be O I BEING THE VOLUME FOR THE YEAR ^ 1923-24. V, COUNCIL. 1927-8. WM. FERGUSSON IRVINE, M.A., F.S.A., Bryn Llwyn, Corwen, North Wales, President. Col. JOHN PARKER, C.B., D.L., F.S.A., Browsholme, Clitheroe, Vice-President. F. C. BEAZLEY, F.S.A., 4 Arnside Road, Oxton, Birken­ head. J. H. E. BENNETT, F.S.A., Shavington, Nr. Crewe. HENRY BRIERLEY, LL.D., 26 Swinley Road, Wigan. E. W. CROSSLEY, F.S.A., Broad Carr, Holywell Green, Halifax. W. E. GREGSON, 43 Moor Lane, Great Crosby, Liverpool. G. T. SHAW, M.A., Chief Librarian, Liverpool Public Library. J. P. SMITH, Arndene, Barrow-in-Furness. RONALD STEWART-BROWN, M.A., F.S.A., Bryn-y-Grög, Nr. Wrexham. HONORARY TREASURER. WM. ASHETON TONGE, P.O. Box, No. 450, 16 Cumberland Street, Manchester. HONORARY SECRETARY. ROBERT GLADSTONE, B.C.L., M.A., 9 Bluecoat Chambers, School Lane, Liverpool. TO THE Mills; antr Siimmtsítrattonsi (ïïncluoíng tíje " Snfra " WLíUx) NOW PRESERVED IN tKíje probate ^egtátrp, AT CHESTER, FOR THE YEARS I8II—1820, BOTH INCLUSIVE. PART I—A TO L. EDITED BY WM. ASHETON TONGE, HONORARY TREASURER. PRINTED FOR THE RECORD SOCIETY OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE. 1928. PREFACE This volume contains Part I, (A—L) of an Index to the Wills proved, Administrations granted, Inventories filed, and other kindred documents preserved in the Probate Registry at Chester during the years 1811 to 1820, both inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • LTP2 Main Document
    Greater Manchester Local Transport Plan 2 2006/07 – 2010/11 March 2006 Final Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 Contents Foreword 4 Summary 6 1 Introduction 12 1.1 The Greater Manchester Area and its Regional Context 13 1.2 Challenges for Greater Manchester 15 2 Greater Manchester's Longer-Term Vision and Integrated Transport Strategy 16 2.1 The Vision for Greater Manchester 17 2.2 The Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Strategy 19 3 Development of LTP2 22 3.1 Lessons Learned from LTP1 23 3.2 Work Completed Since Submission of Provisional LTP2 24 3.3 Strategic Environmental Assessment 25 3.4 Consultation and Engagement 27 3.5 Greater Manchester's Administrative Structure 30 4 Problems, Issues and Desired Outcomes 33 4.1 Overall Approach 33 4.2 General Results of Analysis 33 4.3 Problems in Shared Priority Areas 38 4.3.1 Congestion 38 4.3.2 Accessibility 41 4.3.3 Road Safety 43 4.3.4 Air Quality 47 4.3.5 Public Transport 49 4.4 Regional Centre 51 4.5 Other Quality of Life Issues 54 4.6 Rural Issues 55 4.7 Cross-boundary issues 56 Final Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 Contents 5 The 5-Year Programme 60 5.1 Introduction 60 5.2 Achieving Desired Outcomes by Tackling Shared Priorities 60 5.2.1 Managing Congestion 60 5.2.2 Delivering Accessibility 78 5.2.3 Improving Transport Safety and Security 84 5.2.4 Better Air Quality 91 5.2.5 Public Transport Case Studies 94 5.2.6 Other Quality of Life Issues 99 5.3 Regional Centre 105 5.4 Manchester Airport 107 5.5 Rural Issues 109 5.6 Asset Management 109 5.7 Corridor Partnerships 115
    [Show full text]