DOCSLIB.ORG

CFIB) Versus Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block (CLPB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CFIB) Versus Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block (CLPB Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 87, No. 1, March: 33-40, 2019 www.medicaljournalofcairouniversity.net Intraoperative Assessment of Ultrasound Guided Continuous Facia Iliaca Block (CFIB) Versus Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block (CLPB) in Patients Undergoing Fracture Neck Femur Fixation MOHAMMED A. HASSAN, M.D.; HALA E. MOHAMMED, M.D.; AMR Z. MANSOUR, M.D. and MOHAMMED A. MANSOUR, M.D. The Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Abstract Lumbar plexus block is another form of deep blocks which is approached posteriorly. It is used Background: In the elderly and high risk patients, it is to provide anesthesia and/or analgesia for the entire logic to prefer local anaesthesia rather than general anaesthesia. The fascia iliaca compartment block is an easy, available distribution of the lumbar plexus. The needle used method for peri-operative analgesia in patients with painful in this block is deeply placed so, the potential conditions affecting the thigh, the hip joint and/or the femur. systemic toxicity is greater than it is with superficial Lumbar plexus block is another form of deep blocks which blocks [3] . is used to provide anesthesia and/or analgesia for the entire distribution of the lumbar plexus. As suggested by meta-analysis of previous Aim of Study: Intraoperative assessment of CFIB versus studies, the use of US guidance to provide nerve CLPB. block is more successful, faster to provide, has Material and Methods: 40 patients with fracture neck longer block time and carries less risk for compli- femur were randomized intone of 2 blocks, CFIB and CLPB. cations [4] . Results: CFIB was significantly superior to CLPB as regards shorter time for catheter insertion (CIT) (p<0.001), Patients and Methods earlier maximum motor block (p<0.001) and earlier peak of sensory block (p=0.008), intraoperative hemodynamic stability This prospective randomized controlled trail (p<0.001) while CLPB group showed significantly rapid onset of motor and sensory block (p<0.001, p<0.001). was carried out at department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Kasr El- Conclusion: Continuous infusion fascia iliaca block gives Ainy Hospital from July 2014 to July 2015, after better quality analgesia. It is an easy procedure that could be done in the emergency room. It is faster, safer and more permission from the Hospitals Ethics committee applicable technique than continuous lumbar plexus block. and written informed patients consent. Key Words: Continuous facia iliaca block – Continuous lumbar plexus block – Intraoperative assessment. Forty patients, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I to III, between age 40 to70 years old scheduled for frac- Introduction ture neck femur fixation were selected and divided IN the elderly and high risk patients, it is logic to into two equal groups 20 patients each (Group prefer local anaesthesia rather than general anaes- continuous fascia iliaca block (CFIB) and Group thesia [1] . continuous lumbar plexus block (CLPB)). Informed written consent was taken from the patients selected The fascia iliaca compartment block is an easy, for the study. Each patient was visited in the ward, available method for peri-operative analgesia in the evening before surgery for detailed pre- an- patients with painful conditions affecting the thigh, esthesia assessment. the hip joint and/or the femur [2] . Inclusion criteria: Correspondence to: Dr. Mohammed A. Hassan, • Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists E-Mail: [email protected] status (ASA) I to III. 33 34 CFIB Vs CLPB Fracture Neck Fixation • Age group: 40 to 70 years; scheduled for neck 1- Preoperative preparation: femur fracture fixation surgery. A- Preparation of the patient: 2 • BMI: 20-30kg/m . • Patient consent was taken for spinal and re- • Gender: Both sexes. gional anesthesia. • Patient accepted technique of treatment. • Maintain the therapeutic drugs (that are not contraindicated with regional anesthesia) till • Expected operative time 2-4 hours. morning of operation. Exclusion criteria: • Patient informed before the operation about • ASA physical status score of more than III visual analogue scales. 2 • Patient with BMI of more than 30kg/m . • Peripheral 18 gauge intravenous cannula was inserted and 10ml/kg/hr ringer solution was • Patients refusing the procedure or uncooperative given as preload. or needed GA. • Local sepsis or infection at puncture site. B- Preparation of the equipment and drugs: • Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study. • A standard general anesthesia tray is prepared. • Diabetic peripheral neuropathy or have a history • Standard regional anesthesia tray is prepared of stroke with lesion affecting the side to surgery with the following equipment: were excluded from the study. o Sterile towels and 4*4 gauze packs. • INR >1.5 or <12 hours post LMWH (many prac- o 25 G Quincke spinal needle. titioners consider a posterior approach to lumbar plexus comparable to central neuroaxial blockade) o Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. (Patton and Warman, 2012). o Isobaric bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% o Syringes with local anesthetic lidocaine Methodology in details: o Sterile gloves, marking pen and surface Preoperative assessment: electrode. Routine preoperative assessment was done for o Fentanyle and midazolam ampule. every patient including: o Peripheral nerve stimulator. A- History: o Ultrasound machine with a low-frequency For general or local anesthesia and any accom- (2-5 MHz) curved array probe and a high- panied complications, medical problem and history frequency (7-12 MHz) linear probe. of drug intake. o Catheter kit Contiplex®: B- Examination: - Including a 10cm stimulating needle 18 General examination: guage and a catheter 20 guage for CLPB. • Vital data (pulse, blood pressure and respira- - Including a 4cm stimulating needle 18 tory rate). guage and a catheter 20 guage for CFIB. • Clinical examination of the chest and heart. o Accufuser© Varicon silicone balloon infuser • Examination for jaundice, cyanosis, anemia, control pump. clubbing and edema. 2- Intraoperative management: Local examination: • Standard monitoring was applied (ECG, NIBP, • Airway examination. sPO2) were connected to the patient. Baseline • Examination to the site of injection. hemodynamic readings were recorded before starting the technique, at the beginning of C- Investigations: procedure and every 5 minutes. • Complete blood count. • Sedation was achieved with IV midazolam • Coagulation profile (prothrombin time and (0.03mg/kg) and Fentanyl (50-75 µg). concentration). • Then the patients were assigned to one of two • Liver and kidney function test. groups according to the block form: • Random blood sugar. 1- Group-1 (CFIB), no=20 • ECG. 2- Group-2 (CLPB), no=20 Mohammed A. Hassan, et al. 35 Patients were divided into two equal groups After local anesthetic skin infiltration "ligno- and were subjected to one of the regional blocks caine" 2%, 2-3ml, a 10cm, 20 gauge insulated first then spinal anesthesia. needle connected to a Peripheral nerve stimulator with initial current intensity of 1.0mA (2Hz, 0.1 Group-1 (CFIB): millisecond) was introduced in-plane with the The patient was placed in supine position. The probe. The lumbar plexus was finally identified landmarks for this block are the anterior superior by eliciting quadriceps contraction at current below iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic tubercle of the 0.4mA. The catheter was then inserted in the needle same side. One middle finger was placed on the and advanced 3cm beyond the needle tip. The ASIS and the other middle finger on the pubic needle was then with drawn and the catheter was tubercle. A line was drawn between these two tunneled and fixed with a sterile medication. points. This line was divided into thirds (the index After negative aspiration, activation of the finger of both hands can be used). The point was blocks was performed by injecting 30ml and 40ml marked 1cm caudal from the junction of the lateral of 0.125% bupivacaine in CFIB and CLPB respec- and middle third. This is the injection entry point. tively. Injection was done incrementally over 5 With ultrasound (US) the aim is to visually identify minutes. Vital signs monitoring was continued for the femoral nerve and fascia iliaca and place the 30 minutes after bolus dose. local anaesthetic beneath the fascia, lateral to the femoral nerve. Sensory blockade was assessed in the cutaneous distribution of the femoral nerve (anterior aspect A high frequency ultrasound probe (13-16 MHz, of the thigh), the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve linear array) was used in a transverse direction (lateral aspect of the thigh) and the obturator nerve over the anterior thigh below the inguinal ligament. (medial aspect of the thigh) by using cold percep- The needle was advanced until the tip is placed tion or pinprick. Assessment was done using the underneath the fascia iliaca and the catheter was 3 point scale for sensory assessment: 0=Complete introduced. loss, 1=Partial loss, 2=Normal sensation. Group-2 (CLPB): Motor blockade was assessed by femoral and The patient was placed in the lateral decubitus obturator nerve function (knee extension and thigh position with the side to be operated upper most, adduction). Movement was classified according to and the area was prepared and draped in a sterile modified Bromage scale: No weakness =0, partial fashion. The ultrasound scan was performed using weakness=1, almost complete weakness =2, com- a low frequency, 2-5 MHz, curved array transducer. plete weakness=3. Liberal amounts of ultrasound gel were applied to All assessements were undertaken approximate- the skin over the lumbar paravertebral region for ly every two minutes for 30 minutes. The block acoustic coupling and the ultrasound transducer was considered unsuccessful if the patient failed was positioned approximately 3-4cm lateral and to develop decreased sensation over the ipsilateral parallel to the lumbar spine, with its orientation marker directed cranially, so as to produce a lon- distal thigh and weakness upon knee extension relative to the contralateral limb within 30 minutes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
    The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Institutional Review Board PROJECT SUMMARY Study Title: Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus periarticular infiltration for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial Principal Investigator: Irina Gasanova, MD Sponsor/Funding Source: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical School IRB Number: STU 122015-022 NCT Number: NCT02658240 Date of Document: 01 April 2016 Page 1 of 7 Purpose: In this randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study we plan to evaluate ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block with ropivacaine and periarticular infiltration with ropivacaine for postoperative pain management after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Background: Despite substantial advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of pain and availability of newer analgesic techniques, postoperative pain is not always effectively treated (1). Optimal pain management technique balances pain relief with concerns about safety and adverse effects associated with analgesic techniques. Currently, postoperative pain is commonly treated with systemic opioids, which are associated with numerous adverse effects including nausea and vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, pruritus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression (2). Use of regional and local anesthesia has been shown to reduce opioid requirements and opioid-related side effects. Therefore, their use has been emphasized (3, 4, 5, 6). Fascia Iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a field block that blocks the nerves from the lumbar plexus supplying the thigh (i.e., lateral femoral cutaneous femoral and obturator nerves). The obturator nerve is sometimes involved in the FICB but probably plays little role in postoperative pain relief for most surgeries of the hip and proximal femur.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB)
    Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) Hip Fracture Any of the following present? 1) Neurologic deficit 2) Multisystem Trauma 3) Allergy to local anesthetic Yes *Anticoagulated patients – physician No discretion Standard Care Procedure Details 1) Document distal neurovascular exam in EPIC 1) PO acetaminophen 2) Consult ortho (do not need to await callback) (1,000mg) 3) Obtain verbal consent from patient 2) Consider 0.1 mg/kg 4) Position Patient and U/S Machine morphine or opioid 5) Order Bupivacaine (dose dependent) a. Max 2 mg/kg equivalent b. i.e. 100 mg safe for 50 kg patient 3) Screening labs, CXR, 6) Standard ASA monitoring (telemetry during procedure with ECG, type and screen continuous pulse oximetry, BP measurement, and IV access) 7) Perform FICB 4) Consult orthopedics and medicine as 8) Inform patients on block characteristics: a. Onset ~ 20 minutes necessary b. Duration ~ 8-12 hours Equipment Required Counseling Ultrasound Machine 1) Linear/Vascular Probe set to “Nerve” Benefits setting for best results Decreases: Anesthetic: 1) Pain 1) 0.5% Bupivacaine (20-30 cc) 2) 1% Lidocaine (3-5 cc) 2) Delirium 3) Opioids Saline (10 cc) 4) Hypoxia Syringes: 1) 30 cc 2) 3-5 cc Risks Needles: 1) Pain at injection site 1) Blunt fill 2) Temporary nerve palsy 2) 25G 3) 18G LP needle 3) Intravascular injection Chloroprep or Alcohol swab(s) 4) Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity * (LAST) * LAST (local anesthetic systemic toxicity) 1) Rare and only with intravascular injection which an ultrasound guided approach prevents. 2) Signs include arrhythmias, seizures, convulsions 3) Treatment a.
    [Show full text]
  • Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Yves Kremer, CU Saint-Luc, Av
    Editor | Prof. Dr. V. Bonhomme CO-Editors | Dr. Y. Kremer — Prof. Dr. M. Van de Velde ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, RESUSCITATION, PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE AND PAIN MANAGEMENT (BeSARPP) BELGICA Indexed in EMBASE l EXCERPTA MEDICA ISSN: 2736-5239 Suppl. 1 202071 Master Theses www.besarpp.be Cover-1 -71/suppl.indd 1 12/01/2021 12:37 ACTA ANÆSTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA 2020 – 71 – Supplement 1 EDITORS Editor-in-chief : Vincent Bonhomme, CHU Liège, av. de l’Hôpital 1, B-4000 Liège Co-Editors : Marc Van de Velde, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Yves Kremer, CU Saint-Luc, av. Hippocrate, B-1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert Associate Editors : Margaretha Breebaart, UZA, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem Christian Verborgh, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Jette Fernande Lois, CHU Liège, av. de l’Hôpital 1, B-4000 Liège Annelies Moerman, UZ Gent, C. Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Gent Mona Monemi, CU Saint-Luc, av. Hippocrate, B-1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert Steffen Rex, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven Editorial assistant Carine Vauchel Dpt of Anesthesia & ICM, CHU Liège, B-4000 Liège Phone: 32-4 321 6470; Email: [email protected] Administration secretaries MediCongress Charlotte Schaek and Astrid Dedrie Noorwegenstraat 49, B-9940 Evergem Phone : +32 9 218 85 85 ; Email : [email protected] Subscription The annual subscription includes 4 issues and supplements (if any). 4 issues 1 issue (+supplements) Belgium 40€ 110€ Other Countries 50€ 150€ BeSARPP account number : BE97 0018 1614 5649 - Swift GEBABEBB Publicity : Luc Foubert, treasurer, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, B-9300 Aalst, phone: +32 53 72 44 61 ; Email : [email protected] Responsible Editor : Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascia Iliaca Block in the Emergency Department
    The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Best Practice Guideline Fascia Iliaca Block in the Emergency Department 1 Revised: July 2020 Contents Summary of recommendations ...................................................................................................... 3 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Reason for development ................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Considerations ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Safety of FIB ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Improving safety of FIB .................................................................................................................. 5 Controversies regarding FIB ......................................................................................................... 5 Efficacy of FIB ................................................................................................................................... 6 Procedures within ED ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Implementation of the Fascia Iliaca Block for Acute Hip Fracture Patients
    Education and Implementation of the Fascia Iliaca Block for Acute Hip Fracture Patients Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Roberts, Chrisanna Marie Citation Roberts, Chrisanna Marie. (2021). Education and Implementation of the Fascia Iliaca Block for Acute Hip Fracture Patients (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:44:23 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/658627 EDUCATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK FOR ACUTE HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS by Chrisanna Roberts ________________________ Copyright © Chrisanna Roberts 2021 A DNP Project Submitted to the Faculty of the COLLEGE OF NURSING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF NURSING PRACTICE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 2 1 2 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my fellow group members, Kaitlin Tilton and Jenna Hernandez for their hard work and collaboration on this project. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Sarah Torabi for chairing this project and academic guidance throughout my doctoral degree. Without her hard work and leadership, this project would not have been possible. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Kristie Hoch and Dr. Chris Herring for their mentorship and educational contributions to my nurse anesthesia practice. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Patricia Daly for her involvement in this project as a committee member.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anaesthesia Science Viva Book, Second Edition Simon Bricker Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-72644-3 - The Anaesthesia Science Viva Book, Second Edition Simon Bricker Index More information Index A a2-adrenoceptor agonists abciximab 261 local anaesthesia spinal adjuncts 229 abdominal obesity 171 stress response to surgery 175 abnormal placentation, postpartum haemorrhage a2-adrenoceptor blockers, cardiac output 233 (PPH) 383 b-adrenoceptors 239 abnormal respiration 113 adrenaline 179 abnormal waveforms, capnography 292 b-adrenoceptor blockers 237, 238–41 ABO blood group, see blood groups cardiac output 232 absolute humidity 332 cocaine overdose management 254 absolute pressure 318 intraocular pressure 152 absorption atelectasis 136 b2-adrenoceptor blockers 267 acarbose 277 adrenocortical suppression, etomidate 201 acceleromyography 156 AEP, see auditory evoked potentials ACE inhibitors 242 afferents, autonomic nervous system 23 acetylcholine 23 age/ageing 172–4 muscle action potentials 154 subarachnoid (spinal) anaesthesia 83 postjunctional nicotinic receptors 154 air embolism N-acetylcysteine, paracetamol overdose 252 ultrasound 338 acidosis venous cannulation 18 hypercapnic 121 air-filled spaces, nitrous oxide 206 lactic 111 airway(s) acquired immune response, see immune response awareness 284 activated protein C, sepsis management 399 goitre effects 187 active scavenging systems 312 irritation 203–4 acute haemolytic reactions 372 thyroid disease 187 acute lung disease, compliance 120 upper, see upper airways acute normovolaemic haemodilution 371 airway management acute phase proteins, sepsis
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative
    Health Care Guideline: Perioperative Index Table Sixth Edition January 2020 1. General Preoperative Management Preoperative Health Screening and Assessment Preoperative Testing Electrocardiogram Chest X-ray Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Testing Potassium/Sodium Testing Renal Function (Creatinine) Testing Pregnancy Testing Hemostasis (Coagulation) Testing Glucose Testing in Nondiabetic Patients Sleep Apnea Nicotine Cessation Preparation for Surgery 2. Perioperative Management of Select Conditions Cardiovascular Considerations Prevention of Endocarditis Anticoagulants/Antithrombotics Diabetes Mellitus 3. Perioperative Opioid Management Preoperative Opioid Management Preoperative Patient Education Preoperative Opioid Risk Assessment and Mitigation Preoperative Opioid Use Intraoperative Pain Management Postoperative Opioid Management Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Postoperative Patient Education Perioperative Considerations for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Patients on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Patients Not on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Return to Table of Contents www.icsi.org Copyright © 2020 by Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement 1 Perioperative Sixth Edition /January 2020 Table of Contents Perioperative Perioperative Annotations ..........................................................................................1–59 Guideline Work Opioid Index Table ................................................................................................1 Group Leader Management Evidence Grading .....................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment for Acute Pain: an Evidence Map Technical Brief Number 33
    Technical Brief Number 33 R Treatment for Acute Pain: An Evidence Map Technical Brief Number 33 Treatment for Acute Pain: An Evidence Map Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2015-0000-81 Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center Minneapolis, MN Investigators: Michelle Brasure, Ph.D., M.S.P.H., M.L.I.S. Victoria A. Nelson, M.Sc. Shellina Scheiner, PharmD, B.C.G.P. Mary L. Forte, Ph.D., D.C. Mary Butler, Ph.D., M.B.A. Sanket Nagarkar, D.D.S., M.P.H. Jayati Saha, Ph.D. Timothy J. Wilt, M.D., M.P.H. AHRQ Publication No. 19(20)-EHC022-EF October 2019 Key Messages Purpose of review The purpose of this evidence map is to provide a high-level overview of the current guidelines and systematic reviews on pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for acute pain. We map the evidence for several acute pain conditions including postoperative pain, dental pain, neck pain, back pain, renal colic, acute migraine, and sickle cell crisis. Improved understanding of the interventions studied for each of these acute pain conditions will provide insight on which topics are ready for comprehensive comparative effectiveness review. Key messages • Few systematic reviews provide a comprehensive rigorous assessment of all potential interventions, including nondrug interventions, to treat pain attributable to each acute pain condition. Acute pain conditions that may need a comprehensive systematic review or overview of systematic reviews include postoperative postdischarge pain, acute back pain, acute neck pain, renal colic, and acute migraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Programme Wednesday, 26. June 2019 Student Assembly
    International Council of Nurses Congress 2019, 27 June - 1 July 2019, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore Scientific Programme Wednesday, 26. June 2019 Side meeting 08:30 - 17:00 Academia Student Assembly The ICN Congress Nursing Student Assembly will be held on Wednesday, 26 June from 09:00 to 17:00 at the Academia at the Singapore General Hospital. Registration will begin at 08:30. Simultaneous interpretation will be provided in English, French and Spanish. The Assembly provides nursing students the opportunity to connect, explore and collaborate on priority issues. Registration to the event 08:30 - 09:00 Welcome, Presentation and Introduction by the Singapore Nurses 09:00 - 09:10 Association, ICN Ice breaker 09:10 - 09:30 ICN – The Global Voice of Nursing 09:30 - 09:43 Nursing Now 09:43 - 09:56 State of the World’s Nursing 09:56 - 10:10 Care To Go Beyond 10:10 - 10:40 Break 10:40 - 11:00 Lost in Transition – Newly qualified Registered Nurses and their 11:00 - 11:20 transition to practice journey Developing the next generation – Lessons learnt from the Emerging 11:20 - 11:50 Nurse Leader Programme Hashtags & Healthcare: Social media and its relationship to mental 11:50 - 12:20 health Q&A 12:20 - 12:40 The future of student engagement at ICN 12:40 - 13:00 Lunch 13:00 - 14:00 Group Work (Breakout rooms) 14:00 - 15:30 Break 15:30 - 15:45 Reports of the group work 15:45 - 16:30 Conclusions of the Assembly 16:30 - 16:45 Page 1 / 168 International Council of Nurses Congress 2019, 27 June - 1 July 2019, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore Scientific Programme Thursday, 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances and Technique in Anaesthesia for Ss/Js in Raj. State Health System
    Training module Recent Advances And Technique In Anaesthesia For Ss/Js In Raj. State Health System. INDEX SESSION / SERIAL TOPIC PAGE NO. minute NO. 1. PROGRAMME 3 2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE 4 DAY1 -a A. ANAESTHESIA MACHINE, EQUIPMENT AND TECHNIQUES 1a -30m 3. EXPERIENCE WITH THE GLOSVENT ANAESTHETIC 5-7 MACHINE 1b -30m 4. VAPORISERS 8 1c -30m 5. POSITIONING ON THE OPERARING TABLE 9-12 DAY1 -b B.PHARMACOLOGY 2a -45 m 6. NITRIC OXIDE AND PROPOFOL 13 -15 2b -45 m 7. LEVOBUPIVACAINE 16 -18 3-90m 8. ACUTE OXYGEN TREATMENT 19 -26 4a -45m 9. A NEW MANDATE FOR THE ANAESTHESIOLOGIST - 27 -32 CANCER PAIN SPECIALIST:EXPERTISE IN PRESCRIBING ANALGESICS. 4b -45m 10 EMERGENCY DRUGS IN ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND 33-34 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE DAY2 C. ANAESTHESIA IN PATIENTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMORBID CONDITIONS 1-90 m 20 MONITERING DURING CAESAREAN SECTION 35-38 2a -45m 11. THR PATIENT WITH HEART DISEASE 39-42 2b -45m 12. ANAESTHESIA AND CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE 43 -45 3a -45m 13 ANESTHESIA AND LIVER DISEASE 46 -48 4-90m 14 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS 49 -56 DURING ANAESTHESIA AND SURGERY 3b -45m 15 ANAESTHESIA FOR THE PATIENT WITH 57 -58 RESPIRATORY DISEASE DAY3 D .ANAESTHESIA - SPECIAL COSIDER ATION 1a -30m 16 A MOBILE ANAESTHESIA SERVICE 59 1b -60m 17 A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO EMERGENCY EYE 60 -64 ANAESTHESIA 2-90m 18 ANAESTHESIA FOR ELDERLY PATIENT 65 -69 3-90m 19 ANAESTHESIA FOR THE PATIENT REQUIRING 70 -83 EMERGENCY ABDOMINAL SURGER Y 4-90m 20 INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN PAEDIATRIC 84 -88 PATIENTS DAY4 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks: Different Techniques and Review of the Literature
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 33 (2019) 57e66 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bean 5 Fascia iliaca compartment blocks: Different techniques and review of the literature * Matthias Desmet, MD, PhD, Consultant Anaesthesist a, , Angela Lucia Balocco, MD, Nysora Research fellow b, Vincent Van Belleghem, MD, Consultant Anaesthesist a a Dept of Anesthesia, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Pres. Kennedylaan 4, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium b Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziekenhuizen Oost Limburg (ZOL), Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium Keywords: The fascia iliaca compartment block has been promoted as a fascia iliaca compartment block valuable regional anesthesia and analgesia technique for lower anatomy hip fracture limb surgery. Numerous studies have been performed, but the fi total hip arthroplasty evidence on the true bene ts of the fascia iliaca compartment supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block is still limited. Recent anatomical, radiological, and clinical block research has demonstrated the limitations of the landmark infrainguinal technique. Nevertheless, this technique is still valu- able in situations where ultrasound cannot be used because of lack of equipment or training. With the introduction of ultrasound, a new suprainguinal approach of the fascia iliaca has been described. Research has demonstrated that this technique leads to a more reliable block of the target nerves than the infrainguinal tech- niques. However, more research is needed to determine the place of this technique in clinical practice. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Anatomy of the lumbar plexus and implications for regional anesthesia The lumbar plexus consists of the ventral rami of the L1-L4 spinal nerves and commonly a small contribution of the subcostal nerve from T12.
    [Show full text]
  • Pubmed Search (Advanced)
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Reg Anesth Pain Med Appendix 1: Search strategy (June 18th, 2019) Pubmed Search (advanced) #1. ("Pain"[Mesh] OR "Acute Pain"[Mesh] OR "Pain Management"[Mesh] OR "Pain, Procedural"[Mesh] OR "Analgesia"[Mesh] OR "Analgesia, Patient-Controlled"[Mesh] OR "Analgesia, Epidural"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia and Analgesia"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia, Spinal"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia, Local"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia, Intravenous"[Mesh] OR "Anesthesia, Epidural"[Mesh] OR "Analgesics"[Mesh] OR "Anesthetics"[Mesh] OR Analgesia[Title/Abstract] OR Analgesia Patient-Controlled[Title/Abstract] OR Analgesia Epidural[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia and Analgesia[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia Spinal[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia Local[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia Intravenous[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthesia Epidural[Title/Abstract] OR Analgesics[Title/Abstract] OR Anesthetics[Title/Abstract] OR Acute Pains[Title/Abstract] OR Pain Acute[Title/Abstract] OR Pains Acute[Title/Abstract] OR Management Pain[Title/Abstract] OR Managements Pain[Title/Abstract] OR Pain Managements[Title/Abstract] OR Analgesias[Title/Abstract] OR Analgesia Patient Controlled[Title/Abstract] OR Patient-Controlled Analgesia[Title/Abstract] OR Patient Controlled Analgesia[Title/Abstract] OR Epidural Analgesia[Title/Abstract] OR Assessment Pain[Title/Abstract]
    [Show full text]