DOCSLIB.ORG

Motor Vehicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Minnesota Handbook on Motor Vehicles: Stops, Warrantless Searches, Seizures BASED ON MINNESOTA & FEDERAL CASE LAW HON. ALAN F PENDLETON TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STATE OF MINNESOTA 2012 HON. ALAN F. PENDLETON, TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED, TRANSMITTED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS GRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPYING, RECORDING, OR BY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE HON. ALAN F. PENDLETON. MINNESOTA HANDBOOK ON MOTOR VEHICLES: Stops, Warrantless Searches, Seizures By __________________________________ Hon. Alan F. Pendleton Tenth Judicial District Court Judge ___________________________________ Research Assistants: Michelle Margoles, University of Minnesota Extern Ian Mitchell, University of Minnesota Extern Chelsey Abrahamson, University of Minnesota Extern Manuscript Review and Editing By: Lisa M. Damhof, Abby M. Novak, Kevin Toskey, Abigail Wucherer FIRST EDITION: AUGUST 2012 Hon. Alan F. Pendleton Anoka County Courthouse 325 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Telephone: (763) 422-7309 E-Mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTORY NOTE ___________________________________ THIS HANDBOOK IS DESIGNED TO SERVE A DUAL PURPOSE: 1. To provide judges, attorneys and law enforcement officers with a comprehensive reference guide to the laws governing motor vehicle stops and the seven (7) exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement under which warrantless searches of motor vehicles may be justified. and 2. For use as the instructor’s manual in conjunction with the Judicial Training video entitled: MOTOR VEHICLES: Stops, Warrantless Searches, Seizures i USE OF HANDBOOK ALONG WITH THE VIDEO DURING CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING SESSIONS ___________________________________ INSTRUCTIONS Training sessions utilizing this handbook and the video are estimated to last approximately four (4) to six (6) hours. The video is broken down into nine (9) Chapters which incorporate 13 stop and search hypotheticals (vignettes). These vignettes plot situations specifically designed to illustrate when and under what circumstances a vehicle can be searched without a warrant. In each vignette, after a vehicle is stopped or approached by officers, various parts of the vehicle, including open, closed and locked containers of various size and shapes, are searched by officers without a warrant. At the commencement of the search of each item, the video freezes and a question materializes on the screen. All of the questions that appear in the video are numbered (e.g. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.). The video itself does not provide the answer to any of the questions. The answers to all video questions are contained in this handbook. The handbook answers are numbered to correspond with the video questions (e.g. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.). During the showing of the video, each question appears and remains on the screen for approximately six (6) to eight (8) seconds. If the question cannot be adequately answered within that timeframe, the video should be placed on “pause” to allow additional time to discuss the answer. It is anticipated that in order to thoroughly discuss the answer to most questions, the video will have to be placed on “pause” after the question has been read orally. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. MOTOR VEHICLE STOPS SECTION 1.1 WHAT IS THE GENERAL RULE? ...................................................................................... 1 1. General Rule - Reasonable Suspicion .............................................................................. 1 2. Application of Fourth Amendment................................................................................... 1 3. Definition of "Stop" (Seizure) .......................................................................................... 1 4. Stop v. Contact .................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1.2 WHAT CONSTITUTES A MOTOR VEHICLE? ................................................................ 2 SECTION 1.3 WHAT CONSTITUTES REASONABLE SUSPICION?..................................................... 2 1. What is Reasonable Suspicion? ........................................................................................ 2 2. Minimal Factual Basis Needed to Justify Stop ................................................................ 2 3. The Totality of the Circumstances .................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1.4 WHAT ABOUT INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM INFORMANTS? ........................ 3 1. Anonymous Informants .................................................................................................... 3 2. Private Citizen Informants ................................................................................................ 3 3. Other Police Agencies ....................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1.5 CAN OFFICERS STOP A VEHICLE OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION? ..................... 4 1. Investigative Stops ............................................................................................................ 4 2. Arrests ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Citizens Arrest ................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1.6 VEHICLE STOPS FOR COMPLETED CRIMES ................................................................ 5 1. Completed Crimes (felonies v. misdemeanors) ............................................................... 5 2. Ongoing Misdemeanor Crimes ......................................................................................... 5 3. Exceptions ......................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1.7 APPROACHING AN ALREADY STOPPED VEHICLE ................................................... 6 1. General Rule ...................................................................................................................... 6 2. Asking Driver for Identification ....................................................................................... 6 3. "Good Samaritan" Investigations...................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1.8 WHAT CAN AN OFFICER DO ONCE A VEHICLE IS STOPPED? ................................ 6 1. Plain View Observations................................................................................................... 6 2. Ordering Driver and Occupants of Motor Vehicle Out of Car ........................................ 6 3. Demand for Identification and Proof of Insurance ........................................................... 6 4. Limited Search for Identification………………………………………………………7 5. Limited Search to Inspect Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) ................................... 7 6. Investigative Questions and The Application of Miranda ............................................... 7 7. Expanding the Scope of the Initial Stop………………………………………………..7 SECTION 1.9 HOW LONG CAN THE VEHICLE AND OCCUPANTS BE DETAINED? ..................... 8 SECTION 1.10 CAN VEHICLES BE SEARCHED WITHOUT A WARRANT? ....................................... 8 SECTION 1.11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT. .................................................... 9 ENDNOTES ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 iii CHAPTER 2. SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST SECTION 2.1 WHAT IS THE GENERAL RULE? .................................................................................... 20 1. General Rule .................................................................................................................... 20 2. Legal Justification ........................................................................................................... 20 3. Scope of Vehicle Search ................................................................................................. 20 SECTION 2.2 VIGNETTE #1 D.W.I. ARREST ......................................................................................... 21 2.3 Can the Vehicle be Searched Without a Warrant? ............................................................... 22 2.4 Can the Passenger Compartment Area be Searched? ........................................................... 23 2.5 Can a Purse be Searched? ..................................................................................................... 23 2.6 What if the Purse Belongs to a Non-arrested Occupant? ..................................................... 24 2.7 Can the Glove Box, Phone and Ashtray be Searched? ........................................................ 24 2.8 Can Miscellaneous Clothing be Searched?........................................................................... 25 2.9 Can Small Containers be Searched? ..................................................................................... 25 2.10 Can Large Containers be Searched? ..................................................................................... 25 2.11 Can Locked Containers be Searched? .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • “Canned History”: American Newsreels and The

    “Canned History”: American Newsreels and The

    “Canned History”: American Newsreels and the Commodification of Reality, 1927-1945 By Joseph E.J. Clark B.A., University of British Columbia, 1999 M.A., University of British Columbia, 2001 M.A., Brown University, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of American Civilization at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May, 2011 © Copyright 2010, by Joseph E.J. Clark This dissertation by Joseph E.J. Clark is accepted in its present form by the Department of American Civilization as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date:____________ _________________________________ Professor Susan Smulyan, Co-director Date:____________ _________________________________ Professor Philip Rosen, Co-director Recommended to the Graduate Council Date:____________ _________________________________ Professor Lynne Joyrich, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date:____________ _________________________________ Dean Peter Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii Curriculum Vitae Joseph E.J. Clark Date of Birth: July 30, 1975 Place of Birth: Beverley, United Kingdom Education: Ph.D. American Civilization, Brown University, 2011 Master of Arts, American Civilization, Brown University, 2004 Master of Arts, History, University of British Columbia, 2001 Bachelor of Arts, University of British Columbia, 1999 Teaching Experience: Sessional Instructor, Department of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies, Simon Fraser University, Spring 2010 Sessional Instructor, Department of History, Simon Fraser University, Fall 2008 Sessional Instructor, Department of Theatre, Film, and Creative Writing, University of British Columbia, Spring 2008 Teaching Fellow, Department of American Civilization, Brown University, 2006 Teaching Assistant, Brown University, 2003-2004 Publications: “Double Vision: World War II, Racial Uplift, and the All-American Newsreel’s Pedagogical Address,” in Charles Acland and Haidee Wasson, eds.
  • THE SEARCH for COMPACT BINARY COALESCENCE in ASSOCIATION with SHORT GRBS with LIGO/VIRGO S5/VSR1 DATA by Nickolas V Fotopoulos

    THE SEARCH for COMPACT BINARY COALESCENCE in ASSOCIATION with SHORT GRBS with LIGO/VIRGO S5/VSR1 DATA by Nickolas V Fotopoulos

    THE SEARCH FOR COMPACT BINARY COALESCENCE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SHORT GRBS WITH LIGO/VIRGO S5/VSR1 DATA By Nickolas V Fotopoulos ATHESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS at The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee May 2010 THE SEARCH FOR COMPACT BINARY COALESCENCE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SHORT GRBS WITH LIGO/VIRGO S5/VSR1 DATA By Nickolas V Fotopoulos ATHESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS at The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee May 2010 Jolien Creighton Date Graduate School Approval Date ii THE SEARCH FOR COMPACT BINARY COALESCENCE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SHORT GRBS WITH LIGO/VIRGO S5/VSR1 DATA By Nickolas V Fotopoulos The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, 2010 Under the Supervision of Professor Jolien Creighton ABSTRACT During LIGO’s fifth science run (S5) and Virgo’s first science run (VSR1), x-ray and gamma-ray observatories recorded 33 short, hard gamma-ray bursts (short GRBs), 22 of which had high quality data in two or more detectors. The most convincing explanation for the majority of short GRBs is that in the final stages of an inspiral between a neutron star and a companion compact object, the neutron star is tidally disrupted, providing material to accrete, heat, and eject on sub-second timescales. I describe a search for the gravitational-wave signatures of compact binary coalescence in the vicinity of short GRBs that occurred during S5/VSR1. Jolien Creighton Date iii © Copyright 2010 by Nickolas V Fotopoulos iv to Mom and Bub v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix List of Tables xi List of Figures xiv 1 Introduction 1 2 Short GRBs, CBCs, and gravitational waves 3 2.1 Short gamma-ray burst phenomenology .
  • Section 3: the Search & Call Process in the United Church of Christ

    Section 3: the Search & Call Process in the United Church of Christ

    United Church of Christ SEARCH AND CALL A Pilgrimage through Transitions and New Beginnings SECTION THREE THE SEARCH AND CALL PROCESS in The United Church of Christ “I am confident of this, that the one who began a good work among you will bring it to completion….” Philippians 1:6a SECTION THREE THE SEARCH AND CALL PROCESS in The United Church of Christ I am confident of this, that the one who began a good work among you will bring it to completion…. Philippians 1:6a “A Call, not a Job; a Vocation, not an Occupation” APPROACHING THE TASK: GOD’S COMMITTEE Selecting a Search Committee Just as the local church is not “our” church but rather God’s, so too the Search Committee is really God’s committee. A search for a new pastor is one of the most spiritual ministries in the church. The selection of Search Committee members is a task that is approached with prayer, wisdom, sensitivity, and awareness that God may be calling certain church members to consider serving in this particular capacity.1 One “best practice” for committee selection includes publicizing the criteria for membership on the Search Committee and inviting persons in the congregation Submitting to submit nominations to the governing board. nominations is one of Submitting nominations is one of the many ways that the many ways that the entire congregation can be informed about and included in the search process; it should be made the entire clear, however, that not all nominees will be congregation can be selected. Those who submit nominations should informed about and include a brief description of the reasons why that included in the search person would be an asset to the committee.
  • STATE of NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN H. LYNCH GOVERNOR Raymond S. Burton John D. Shea Beverly A. Hollingworth Raymond J. Wieczorek Debo

    STATE of NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN H. LYNCH GOVERNOR Raymond S. Burton John D. Shea Beverly A. Hollingworth Raymond J. Wieczorek Debo

    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN H. LYNCH GOVERNOR Raymond S. Burton John D. Shea Beverly A. Hollingworth Raymond J. Wieczorek Deborah Pignatelli Executive Councilors Department of Justice Kelly A. Ayotte Attorney General June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE LAW REGARDING ON-THE-STREET ENCOUNTERS AND INVESTIGATIVE DETENTIONS...................................................................................................1 A. Introduction.........................................................................................1 B. Initial Encounter .................................................................................1 C. When An Encounter Constitutes A Seizure........................................2 1. Factors Relevant In Determining Whether A Person Has Been Seized .............................................................................2 2. Submission Is Not Necessary For A Seizure To Occur ..........3 D. Investigative Or Terry Stops...............................................................4 1. An Investigative Stop Must Be Supported By Reasonable Suspicion..................................................................................4 2. General Factors That May Support Reasonable Suspicion To Justify A Terry Stop...........................................................5 3. Specific Factors That May Support Reasonable Suspicion To Justify A Terry Stop...........................................................6 a. Officer’s Personal Knowledge And Observations .......6 b. Officer’s Training And Experience..............................6
  • 41M-Search & Seizure

    41M-Search & Seizure

    Policy Number: Subject: Search & Seizure Accreditation Standards: 41M Lexington Police Reference: 1.2.4(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g) Effective Date: Department 3/11/13 ☐New Revision 1/24/19 ☒ Revised Dates: By Order of: Mark J. Corr, Chief of Police The Municipal Police Institute, Inc. (MPI) is a private, nonprofit charitable affiliate of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association. MPI provides training and model policies and procedures for police agencies. This policy is an edited version of MPI Policy 1.08, “Search & Seizure.” GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND GUIDELINES The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits "unreasonable" searches and seizures, and the Supreme Court has consistently held that unless they come within one of the few carefully limited exceptions to the search warrant requirement, warrantless searches and seizures are considered unreasonable.i The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court to require that, whenever possible and practicable, with certain limited exceptions, a police officer should always obtain a valid search warrant in advance.ii The following procedures have been prepared to provide basic guidelines that are both legal and practical in the technical area of searches and seizures. It is the policy of the Lexington Police Department that: Warrants shall be obtained for all searches whenever possible and practicable once the foundation for constitutional regulations have been triggered. Searches are subject to constitutional regulation when the following three conditions are met: • State action: The search must be undertaken by a state actor, (law enforcement official/ agent of the government).
  • Am I Being Detained? Am I Free to Go? by Sgt. Les L. Moody Jr. Texarkana

    Am I Being Detained? Am I Free to Go? by Sgt. Les L. Moody Jr. Texarkana

    Am I being detained? Am I free to go? By Sgt. Les L. Moody Jr. Texarkana Arkansas Police Department School of Law Enforcement Supervision Session XLII Am I being detained, or am I free to go? As a Sergeant with the Texarkana Arkansas Police Department, I have discovered, during my twenty-two years on the job, that law enforcement officers are faced with these questions on a daily basis. As a law enforcement officer, you will frequently need to ask yourself if you are actually detaining an individual or if it is merely a consensual encounter. Law enforcement officers make traffic stops, set up roadblocks for various reasons, serve warrants, make arrests, and search houses, vehicles and people. In each of these common duties of the officer, the individual is protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. However, the United States Supreme Court has recognized it is not always possible to obtain a warrant and has provided law enforcement with certain exceptions to the warrant requirement. It is important for every officer to understand his or her limitations under the law. What constitutes a search? What constitutes a seizure? Is an arrest a seizure? An officer makes a traffic stop. Does he automatically have the right to search the vehicle and occupants? An officer responds to a domestic disturbance. Does he automatically have the right to search the residence? An officer sees an individual walking in a residential neighborhood at 3 a.m.
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas

    In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-20014-01-JAR CHRISTOPHER A. PRYOR, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Christopher Pryor’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 13). Defendant contends that evidence seized by law enforcement from an encounter with Defendant on December 20, 2014 was seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The Government has responded (Doc. 16), and an evidentiary hearing was held on September 14, 2016. The Court has reviewed the evidence and arguments adduced at the hearing and is now prepared to rule. As explained in detail below, Defendant’s motion is denied. I. Factual Background Based on the testimony and evidence admitted at the hearing on this motion, the Court finds as follows. On December 20, 2014, Officer Nicholas Stein, an officer with the drug unit of the Olathe, Kansas Police Department, was conducting surveillance on a specific house on Loula Street in Olathe, Kansas where drug activity was suspected. Officer Stein observed a grey Toyota Corolla driven by an individual later identified as Defendant Christopher Pryor leave that home and turn north from Loula Street onto Pine Street without utilizing a left turn signal. Officer Stein attempted to get behind the vehicle, which then turned west on Santa Fe Street and north on Iowa Street. The vehicle made a right into an alleyway adjacent to Iowa Street. Based 1 on Defendant taking multiple turns and ducking into an alleyway, Officer Stein testified that he believed the driver of the vehicle was attempting to evade the police.
  • The Research Problem and Rationale for This Study

    The Research Problem and Rationale for This Study

    HEARTS AROUND THE FIRE: FIRST NATIONS WOMEN TALK ABOUT PROTECTING AND PRESERVING FIRST NATIONS CULTURES IN SASKATCHEWAN PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEMS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction University of Regina by Laura L.M. Whiteman Regina, Saskatchewan March 2009 © 2009: Laura L.M. Whiteman Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-55146-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-55146-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • DOCUMENT REZUME ED 378 320 CE 067 892 TITLE the Women's Guide to Traditional Andnontraditional Careers and Education.A Resource

    DOCUMENT REZUME ED 378 320 CE 067 892 TITLE the Women's Guide to Traditional Andnontraditional Careers and Education.A Resource

    DOCUMENT REZUME ED 378 320 CE 067 892 TITLE The Women's Guide to Traditional andNontraditional_ Careers and Education. A Resource Guide forWomen in_ the Greater Omaha Area Who Wish To Enteror Re-enter the Work Forceor Further Their Education. INSTITUTION Metropolitan Community Coll., SPONS AGENCY Omaha, NE. Omaha CommunityFoundation, NE. PUB DATE Apr 94 NOTE 80p. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 PlusPostage. DESCRIPTORS Career Choice; CareerDevelopment; *Career Planning; *Community Resources;*Displaced Homemakers; *Employed Women; *Job Search Methods;Postsecondary Education; ReentryWorkers; Self Evaluation (Individuals); *WomensEducation IDENTIFIERS *Nebraska (Omaha) ABSTRACT Developed for women in Omaha who are preparingto reenter the labor marketor further their education, provides information this guide on where to go, to whomto talk, what support services are available,and what actions these guide is organized women can take. The by the followingthree broad categories: ready, education and getting training, and employment.Topics covered in the first section includecareer planning and counseling, child care, and libraries, money. In the educationand training section, education, the basics,choices, and financial aid are outlined.The following topicsare contained in the employment Occupational Outlook section: Handbook, where to look,resumes and interviews, nontraditional work,being your own boss, rights. At the beginning job alternatives,and job of each section isa brief description of how to use theresources in the section, of contents. Resources as well as a detailed table listed in these threesections include the following: schools,colleges, apprenticeship offices, laws, programs, agencies, government publications,and businesses. A resource section of the guide final lists 10 books and 5other publications.
  • Search Warrant Manual

    Search Warrant Manual

    The Complete Search Warrant, Annotated Consolidated Edition By Albert M. Rosenblatt NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM November 2004 Copyright © 2005 New York State Unified Court System All rights reserved ABOUT THE AUTHOR A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School, Albert M. Rosenblatt is a Judge on the New York Court of Appeals and former Chief Administrative Judge of New York State. Before that, he had been Dutchess County’s District Attorney and then served on the County Court, Supreme Court, and Appellate Division, Second Department. He has written on a variety of legal and popular topics. He and his wife Julia, a writer and former Vassar College professor, live in Dutchess County. Their daughter, Betsy, is an attorney in California, specializing in intellectual property. PREFACE "Where is your warrant?" This question has been asked countless times, but rarely with more drama than in "The Disappearance of Lady Frances Carfax," a Sherlock Holmes adventure. The villain, a bogus preacher named Holy Peters, was unlawfully secreting his victim and Holmes demanded entry. On his side, the great detective had only justice and a revolver. Where was the warrant? Holmes half drew the revolver from his pocket and replied, "This will have to serve till a better one comes," Holmes explained. The approach worked well for Sherlock Holmes but will not do for American law enforcement officials. A revolver can be as effective as a warrant, and may even produce prompter compliance, but given the exclusionary rule, it would be uneconomical to trade in this modest volume for a Colt .45.
  • Oral Argument Of: Page: 3 Matthew A

    Oral Argument Of: Page: 3 Matthew A

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RYAN AUSTIN COLLINS, ) Petitioner, ) v. ) No. 16-1027 VIRGINIA, ) Respondent. ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pages: 1 through 63 Place: Washington, D.C. Date: January 9, 2018 HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION Official Reporters 1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 628-4888 www.hrccourtreporters.com Official - Subject to Final Review 1 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 RYAN AUSTIN COLLINS, ) 4 Petitioner, ) 5 v. ) No. 16-1027 6 VIRGINIA, ) 7 Respondent. ) 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 10 Washington, D.C. 11 Tuesday, January 9, 2018 12 13 The above-entitled matter came on for oral 14 argument before the Supreme Court of the United States 15 at 11:08 a.m. 16 17 APPEARANCES: 18 MATTHEW A. FITZGERALD, Richmond, Virginia; on behalf 19 of the Petitioner. 20 TREVOR S. COX, Acting Solicitor General of Virginia, 21 Richmond, Virginia; on behalf of the Respondent. 22 23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation Official - Subject to Final Review 2 1 C O N T E N T S 2 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: PAGE: 3 MATTHEW A. FITZGERALD 4 On behalf of the Petitioner 3 5 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: 6 TREVOR S. COX 7 On behalf of the Respondent 32 8 REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF: 9 MATTHEW A. FITZGERALD 10 On behalf of the Petitioner 61 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation Official - Subject to Final Review 3 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 (11:08 a.m.) 3 CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: We'll hear 4 argument next in Case 16-1027, Collins versus 5 Virginia.
  • Rachel Carson

    Rachel Carson

    FIRST PUBLISHED 1951 THE SEA AROUND US tells the strange and exciting story of the seas, how they came into being, and how Earth's life emerged from them. Miss Carson writes of the teeming life of the upper levels, of the icy, black, primeval depths, of the immense forces which find their expression in tides and currents, of towering mountains and desolate canyons. She describes the pulsings of spring when salmon migrate and jelly fish spawn, of the mysterious creatures that have so far evaded all man's efforts to catch them. Rachel Carson was a scientist by vocation who happened to possess the poetic, imaginative temperament of a truly great writer “The sense of force and movement in her prose is one of Miss Carson's best qualities . perfectly suited to her subject, to the restless, always moving waters, swarming with life, full of beauty and horror” Jacquetta Hawkes Over two-thirds of the Earth’s surface is covered by the sea. In this unique and fascinating book, Rachel Carson does nothing less than present a history of the sea from the earliest times and draw a panoramic picture in magnificent prose of the fantastic marine world which hides beneath its enigmatic surface. Miss Carson traces the beginnings of the sea in the Chaos of the World’s birth pangs and shows how the Earth’s first crude forms of life emerged from its saline womb. She describes the swarming life of the upper levels, the icy black primeval depths fissured with unimaginably deep canyons and ridged with immense mountain ranges, and the titanic forces of tides and currents.