DOCSLIB.ORG

Backgrounder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ba ckgrounder An introduction to the Fish & Wildlife Co mpensation Program – Colu mbia Basin Contents Need . .1 Solution . .1 Mandate . .3 Results . .4 This Year’s Approved Projects 5 Funding Applications . .7 The Need – An Historical Overview In 1962 the Provincial Government created a new In addition to these dams constructed under the Crown corporation – BC Hydro – to develop hydro - Treaty, BC Hydro operates other power facilities in electric projects in the Peace and Columbia River the Columbia Basin – on behalf of the Provincial regions. In the following decades, BC Hydro acted Government – including: Aberfeldie, Elko, Kootenay on behalf of the Provincial Government to design, Canal, Revelstoke, Seven Mile, Spillimacheen, build and operate several ambitious hydroelectric Walter Hardman and Whatshan. projects. Some impacts from dam construction, including Construction of BC Hydro’s dams and generating flooding and the creation of reservoirs, were stations in the Canadian portion of the Columbia immediately evident, such as the Seven Mile dam River Basin began in the 1960s with the Columbia development that flooded white-tailed deer habitat River Treaty projects. Three Treaty dams were in the Pend d’Oreille Valley. Other impacts, such as developed to provide water storage (flood preven - the decline in lake productivity that occurred when tion) and power generation for the United States. nutrients became trapped upstream by dams, took several decades before becoming evident. By 1990, Columbia River Treaty Dams built by BC Hydro : for example, kokanee stocks in the South Arm of •Duncan Dam (water storage) Kootenay Lake were virtually non-existent. •Hugh Keenleyside Dam (water storage) •Mica Dam (powerhouse and water storage) The Solution – Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program Up until 1995 efforts to compensate for these fish projects aimed at species impacted by the “foot - and wildlife losses were being handled by a variety print” of BC Hydro dams in the Canadian po rtion of of locally-based compensation programs. In 1995 the Columbia Basin. (i.e., footprint means the initial the Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program construction and impoundment impacts primarily (Columbia Basin) was created, amalgamating the associated with lost habitat). existing Mica, Revelstoke, Hugh Keenleyside, Duncan and Seven Mile compensation programs. In 1995 the newly created FWCP consolidated Compensation efforts around the smaller dams in efforts, resulting in a comprehensive and integrated the East Kootenay were also incorporated into this approach towards fish and wildlife conservation and new, consolidated regional entity. enhancement. As part of its water license agreement, BC Hydro The FWCP is a joint initiative, separate from – but provides the FWCP with $3.2 million each year not independent of – BC Hydro, the Government of (indexed for inflation based on 1995 dollars) in British Columbia (Ministry of Environment), and the perpetuity to deliver conservation and enhancement Federal Government (Fisheries and Oceans Canada). F ra ser River Moose Lake Jasper Valemount 16 R Ca O noe River Columbia Basin C C K O Y L 5 M Generation U O r ive M R Fortress d 93 U o LEGEND o HAMBER Lake PARK W N B Region Boundary I T A r A MICA CUMMINS C e Highways c LAKES y DAM PARK r I 95 B N r M e v B i u s S R h Dams Blue River n R O lliva Su i v Revelstoke e r BC Hydro Reservoir U Bigmouth Creek Kinbasket Fortis BC Reservoir N Teck Cominco r T e r i v e G Gold R v o i Columbia Power Corp./ A lds R trea Riv ry m er er Columbia Basin Trust eb I a Do l Lake N w GLACIER B n USA DOWNIE i NATIONAL Louise CREEK e PARK r C e S PARK YOHO iv 1 re e NATIONAL R k PARK Independent Power Producer e s K r ick o in g H MT B Golden REVELSTOKE e a National Parks Jorda MARTHA NATIONAL v n PARK e CREEK r PARK er M iv R Sp R R i il t v lim i e a v e ch e a e S r e Provincial Parks O r w n e l r R l e i REVELSTOKE i v c v E e i 95 N lle r DAM I R 1 x L Revelstoke u 93 A e KOOTENAY MOUNT l D SPILLIMACHEEN NATIONAL ASSINIBOINE p K BLANKET p u PARK PARK CREEK a n DAM S c m PARK a Bla o nket n C I reek c Sicamous n H ry I R C er R BUGABOO nb o ra i PARK WALTER C AKOLKOLEX v l Mara e u r m HARDMAN K Lake E Trout b i DAM Lake a ELK LAKES Coursier R PARK AND E P i Lake v RECREATION e AREA Shelter r ALBERTA Galena Trout U thief Creek Mabel Bay rse MONASHEE P Lake o HEIGHT i Lake n PARK g R H OF THE M s r t Invermere ROCKIES e o M n v r PARK i L C e R (Upper) a v rd i O Sugar e Duncan Windermere R O a Arrow Lakes u E Lake Lake y PINGSTON R Reservoir a W Reservoir i n h p v U i L e a e t U r t e w GOAT o R s SUGAR A RANGE L o i u Howser v h r PARK Lumby N S LAKE DAM r K e ow Nakusp N r DUNCAN Columbia WHITESWAN P WILSEY a B DAM la Lake LAKE PARK T r o Fin y k T DAM na Argenta M Cree A C nza Lardeau k Canal r C A Flats 6 Whatshan McDONALD r Whiteswan B CREEK Slocan I ar Lake O Lake ne PARK I Elkford N s LakeN C 95 r Sandon U e Premier e 93 S k New DSenver Lake WHATSHAN Burton N DAM Kaslo T PREMIER A r PURCELL LAKE e 6 v Fauquier PARK i WILDERNESS R r I e PARK e R TOP OF THE v N s i k r Sparwood WORLD PARK l A SOUTH SLOCAN DAM R Edgewood o l E VALHALLA Slocan S H l B LOWER BONNINGTON DAM (Lower) PARK d u r l B 3 e KOKANEE Kootenay Kimberley i Coleman v C UPPER BONNINGTON DAM Arrow Lakes i GLACIER Lake W R PARK ABERFELDIE n Reservoir a D CORRA LINN DAM c DAM o t Mary R GRANBY l WEST ARM S i PARK S LOCKHART ver r PARK CREEK k N ve PARK ree o D Ri Cranbrook an C rn C Fernie Bowm Deer s B Nelson C A Park SYRINGA r City of Nelson Power Plant R Wardner e e y i CREEK PARK e y a KOOTENAY G k o n G o Renata e CANAL M ld t o Robson o C Fl o KIANUKO a a K r th t Moyie PARK e e BRILLIANT e R k a Lake d KEENLEYSIDE DAM i ELKO v GLADSTONE DAM 6 e KIKOMUN R r DAM i PARK Castlegar CREEK v CHAMPION r PARK e ve r LAKES Ri Christina PARK Salmo r e NANCY i e y AKAMINA- Lake GREENE v GILNOCKIE i 3 o KISHINENA RA Trail eek 3 R STAGLEAP Cr M PARK PARK Warfield PARK it Fruitvale o Summ Grand Forks Montrose al m K Creston Rossland S o o t e er n r iv a e R i v R i SEVEN Koocanusa BOUNDARY i Eureka R v MILE e Reservoir e ia DAM r l b t t m DAM e lu WANETA P K o e C n DAM d d ’O r e i l Bonners Ferry l e WASHINGTON Kettle Falls R i v e r MONTANA Roosevelt IDAHO Reservoir LIBBY Libby . d DAM t L NORTH Pend Oreille s m a Lake r g a i D & s p 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 km a M ¥ Astoria, Oregon s e 960km n o J The Mandate The Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program’s (FWCP) mandate is to deliver projects to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife populations affected by BC Hydro dam “footprint’ impacts throughout the Columbia River Basin in Canada. Columbia River Basin Annual FWCP funding is used to fund and support fish and wildlife projects. Applications for funding are reviewed annually. Visit the FWCP Mica Dam website for complete N information on project BC Revelstoke Dam funding criteria, as well Spillimacheen Dam Coursier Dam Kootenay Canal Generating Station as small- and large-proj - A South Slocan Dam Arrow Lakes Duncan Dam B Lower Bonnington Dam ect funding applications. Whatsham Dam C Upper Bonnington Dam CD D Corra Linn Dam Brilliant Dam AB www.fwcp.ca Kootenay Aberfeldie Dam VANCOUVER Keenleyside Dam Lake a Elko Dam Canad Waneta Dam Seven Mile Dam . The work of the FWCP VICTORIA Libby Dam U.S is guided by Policy and Grand Coulee Hungry Horse Chief Joseph Albeni Falls Flathead Noxon Lake BC Hydro Dams Steering Committees Wells Pend Orielle Kent Columbia Power made up of Program Rocky Reach Lake SEATTLE Corporation/ Partners – BC Hydro, the Rock Island Lower Monumental Columbia Basin Little Goose MT Trust Dam B.C. Ministry of Wanapum Lower Grande Priest Rapids Dams owned by Environment (MoE), and Dworshak others in Canada Fisheries and Oceans Corps of Engineers WA Dams Canada. Public and Ice Harbour PORTLAND McNary Dams owned by First Nations John Day others in U.S Hells Canyon representatives The Dalles Bureau of Oxbow Reclamation Dams Bonneville participate on the Brownlee Steering Committee Jackson Lake and help ensure the Boise Projects FWCP is aware of, OR ID and responding to public concerns and input.
Recommended publications
  • Kootenay System Operations

    Kootenay System Operations

    Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Appendix C Kootenay System Operations Operation of the Kootenay River system is complicated as it is administered by several different jurisdictions and the hydroelectric facilities are owned by different agencies/companies. As shown in Figure 1, the Kootenay River originates in the Rocky Mountains not far from Field, BC. The river flows south, within a few km of the source of the Columbia River at Canal Flats, and then continues south into Koocanusa Reservoir, formed behind Libby Dam in Montana, United States. From Libby, the Kootenay River turns west and north, and re-enters British Columbia near the community of Creston, flowing into the south arm of Kootenay Lake. In the northern part of the Kootenay basin, the Duncan River is joined by the Lardeau River just downstream from Duncan Dam, and then flows into the north arm of Kootenay Lake. Water from the north and south arms of Kootenay Lake then flows through the west arm of the lake and past the Corra Linn Dam near Nelson (as well as other dams) en route to the Columbia–Kootenay confluence at Castlegar. The components of this system and various agreements/orders that regulate flows are described in this Appendix. November 29, 2013 1 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Figure 1: Kootenay and Columbia Region November 29, 2013 2 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies 1.0 Coordination of Libby Operations Background Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, Canada permitted the U.S. to build the Libby Dam on the Kootenai River (U.S.
  • BCUC IR1 Response

    BCUC IR1 Response

    Diane Roy FortisBC Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 16705 Fraser Highway Surrey, B.C. V4N 0E8 Gas Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Tel: (604)576-7349 Email: [email protected] Cell: (604) 908-2790 Fax: (604) 576-7074 Electric Regulatory Affairs Correspondence www.fortisbc.com Email: [email protected] October 1, 2020 British Columbia Utilities Commission Suite 410, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2N3 Attention: Ms. Marija Tresoglavic, Acting Commission Secretary Dear Ms. Tresoglavic: Re: FortisBC Inc. (FBC) Project No. 1599119 Annual Review for 2020 and 2021 Rates (Application) Response to the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) Information Request (IR) No. 1 On August 19, 2020, FBC filed the Application referenced above. In accordance with BCUC Order G-211-20 setting out the Regulatory Timetable for the review of the Application, FBC respectfully submits the attached response to BCUC IR No. 1. If further information is required, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, FORTISBC INC. Original signed: Diane Roy Attachments cc (email only): Registered Parties FortisBC Inc. (FBC or the Company) Submission Date: Annual Reivew for 2020 and 2021 Rates ~ Project No. 1599119 (Application) October 1, 2020 Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) Information Request (IR) Page 1 No. 1 1 Table of Contents Page no. 2 A. LOAD FORECAST AND REVENUE AT EXISTING RATES ................................................. 2 3 B. OTHER REVENUE .............................................................................................................28
  • 2010 Management's Discussion and Analysis

    2010 Management's Discussion and Analysis

    2010 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS March 4, 2011 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is designed to provide the reader with a greater understanding of the Company’s business, the Company’s business strategy and performance, the Company’s expectations of the future, and how the Company manages risk and capital resources. It is intended to enhance the understanding of the audited annual consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, and should therefore be read in conjunction with these documents, and should also be read together with the text below on forward-looking statements. Reference in this MD&A to the “Company” or to “SNC-Lavalin” means, as the context may require, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. and all or some of its subsidiaries or joint ventures, or SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. or one or more of its subsidiaries or joint ventures. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information presented in this MD&A, including tabular amounts, is in Canadian dollars, and prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Statements made in this MD&A that describe the Company’s or management’s budgets, estimates, expectations, forecasts, objectives, predictions or projections of the future may be “forward-looking statements”, which can be identifi ed by the use of the conditional or forward-looking terminology such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “expects”, “may”, “plans”, “projects”, “should”, “will”, or the negative thereof or other variations thereon. The Company cautions that, by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and that its actual actions and/or results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements, or could affect the extent to which a particular projection materializes.
  • SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM Supersedes SOO 7T-33 Issued 13 October 2020

    SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM Supersedes SOO 7T-33 Issued 13 October 2020

    BC HYDRO T&D SYSTEM OPERATIONS SYSTEM OPERATING ORDER 7T-33 SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM Supersedes SOO 7T-33 issued 13 October 2020 Effective Date: 09 March 2021 Expiry Year: 2025 Original signed by: APPROVED BY: Bob Cielen, Operations Planning Manager, T&D System Operations Requires same day posting on bchydro.com and on BCRC Extranet upon release. Requires same day MRS conveyance notification upon posting Denotes Revision SOO 7T-33 Effective Date: 09 March 2021 Page 2 of 32 SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM INDEX 1.0 GENERAL .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 SYSTEM VOLTAGE CONTROL ........................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Nominal Voltage .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 SF6 Switchgear Voltage Ratings ..................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Overvoltage Protection .................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 MCA & REV RMR for Voltage Control ............................................................................................ 7 4.0 SERIES CAPACITORS OPERATIONS ..............................................................................................
  • Dams and Hydroelectricity in the Columbia

    Dams and Hydroelectricity in the Columbia

    COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: DAMS AND HYDROELECTRICITY The power of falling water can be converted to hydroelectricity A Powerful River Major mountain ranges and large volumes of river flows into the Pacific—make the Columbia precipitation are the foundation for the Columbia one of the most powerful rivers in North America. River Basin. The large volumes of annual runoff, The entire Columbia River on both sides of combined with changes in elevation—from the the border is one of the most hydroelectrically river’s headwaters at Canal Flats in BC’s Rocky developed river systems in the world, with more Mountain Trench, to Astoria, Oregon, where the than 470 dams on the main stem and tributaries. Two Countries: One River Changing Water Levels Most dams on the Columbia River system were built between Deciding how to release and store water in the Canadian the 1940s and 1980s. They are part of a coordinated water Columbia River system is a complex process. Decision-makers management system guided by the 1964 Columbia River Treaty must balance obligations under the CRT (flood control and (CRT) between Canada and the United States. The CRT: power generation) with regional and provincial concerns such as ecosystems, recreation and cultural values. 1. coordinates flood control 2. optimizes hydroelectricity generation on both sides of the STORING AND RELEASING WATER border. The ability to store water in reservoirs behind dams means water can be released when it’s needed for fisheries, flood control, hydroelectricity, irrigation, recreation and transportation. Managing the River Releasing water to meet these needs influences water levels throughout the year and explains why water levels The Columbia River system includes creeks, glaciers, lakes, change frequently.
  • Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Draft

    Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Draft

    DRAFT SCOPING STUDY WORKING COPY FOR VIEWING PURPOSES BRILLIANT ONLY HEADPOND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVE KATARINA HARTWIG HEATHER LESCHIED MAY 2017 Scoping Study: Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Katarina Hartwig, Heather Leschied | May 2017 Design and Layout: Mandi McRobbie Cover Photo: Douglas Noblet, WildAir Photography ©2017 Living Lakes Canada All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long as you cite the source Living Lakes Canada Box 691 Invermere, BC V0A 1K0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Scoping Study is intended to be the first phase of a stewardship strategy for the Brilliant Headpond Reservoir. The Scoping Study is guided by the Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Steering Committee, which includes leaders from the Brilliant Headpond communities of Tarrys, Thrums, Glade, Shoreacres, and South Slocan, representatives of the Ktunaxa First Nation and Okanagan Nation Alliance, and Regional District of Central Kootenay (RDCK) Area I Director, Andy Davidoff, and RDCK Area H Director, Walter Popoff. The Brilliant Headpond Reservoir (“BHPR”) was created by the damming of the Kootenay River at the Brilliant Canyon for the completion of the West Kootenay Power Corps. Brilliant Dam hydroelectric project completed in 1944. The BHPR area extends from Columbia Power Corporation’s (current owner) Brilliant Dam and Brilliant Expansion Project (2007) upstream to the Slocan Pool area just below BC Hydro’s Kootenay Canal (1975) and FortisBC’s South Slocan (1928) dams. FortisBC owns and operates the four dams on the Lower Kootenay, upstream of Brilliant Dam, and FortisBC operates Brilliant Dam and Brilliant Expansion facilities on behalf of Columbia Power Corporation.
  • Columbia Basin Plan

    Columbia Basin Plan

    FOR REFERENCE ONLY This version is now archived. Updated 2019 Columbia Region Action Plans available at: fwcp.ca/region/columbia-region Photo credit: Larry Halverson COLUMBIA BASIN PLAN June 2012 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program ........................................................................ 1 Vision ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Principles .................................................................................................................................. 2 Partners .................................................................................................................................... 2 Policy Context ........................................................................................................................... 2 Program Delivery ...................................................................................................................... 4 Project Investment Criteria ...................................................................................................... 4 2. The Columbia River Basin .................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Setting .............................................................................................................................
  • Kootenay System Overview

    Kootenay System Overview

    Kootenay System Overview Heather Matthews March 2016 Kootenay System Storage - Koocanusa Reservoir - Duncan Reservoir - Kootenay Lake 2 Dams • Libby Dam (USACE) • Duncan Dam (BC Hydro) • Kootenay Canal Plant (BC Hydro) • River Plants (Fortis) • Corra Linn • Upper Bonnington / [City of Nelson] • Lower Bonnington • South Slocan • Brilliant & Expansion (CPC) 3 River Plants 4 Agreements & Regulatory • Columbia River Treaty • Duncan Reservoir • Koocanusa Reservoir • International Joint Commission • Kootenay Lake • BC Water Licenses • Storage and diversion for power purposes • Canal Plant Agreement • Operate like one owner 5 Libby and the Treaty Columbia River Treaty: o Provide the US with the option to build Libby Dam o Koocanusa reservoir floods 42 miles into Canada o Libby Dam provides flood and power benefits for Canada. o Power generated at Libby belongs to the US o Power benefits downstream in Canada on the Kootenay river stay in Canada o Coordination on Libby operation continues even if Treaty is terminated. o Canada can request a change in operation. If it is not to the US disadvantage the US shall agree 6 Canal Plant Agreement History • 1964: Columbia River Treaty was ratified • River plants and Brilliant already existed on the Kootenay River • Regulation of Kootenay River flows by Duncan Dam (1967) and Libby Dam (1973) made the Kootenay Canal Plant economic • In 1972 BC Hydro, West Kootenay Power and Cominco entered into the Canal Plant Agreement “cooperate in the operation of their available storages and generating facilities in British Columbia for the purpose of obtaining optimum generation” 7 Kootenay River System An Engineer’s View Since KCL is more efficient than the River Plants, water is diverted to Kootenay Canal instead of through river plants.
  • Fortisbc Inc. an Indirect Subsidiary of Fortis Inc. Annual Information Form

    Fortisbc Inc. an Indirect Subsidiary of Fortis Inc. Annual Information Form

    FortisBC Inc. An indirect subsidiary of Fortis Inc. Annual Information Form For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 Dated March 10, 2020 FortisBC Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION .................................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 NAME AND INCORPORATION ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 INTER-CORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS ..................................................................................................... 6 2.0 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 THREE-YEAR HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 THE BUSINESS OF FORTISBC INC. ................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 GENERATION AND POWER SUPPLY ......................................................................................................
  • Environmental Impact Statement Template

    Environmental Impact Statement Template

    y g r n e o n ry i E s to is Office of Energy Projects l a ra l m e u September 2011 d g m e e o R C F FERC/FEIS – 0239F Final Environmental Impact Statement Application for Hydropower License for the Boundary Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 2144-038, Washington And Application for Surrender of Hydropower License for the Sullivan Creek Project FERC Project No. 2225-015, Washington Sullivan Lake Dam Boundary Dam Mill Pond Dam Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 FERC/F-0239 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Application for Hydropower License for the Boundary Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 2144-038, Washington And Application for Surrender of Hydropower License for the Sullivan Creek Project FERC Project No. 2225-015, Washington Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 September 2011 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20426 OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS To the Agency or Individual Addressed: Reference: Final Environmental Impact Statement Attached is the final environmental impact statement (final EIS) for the relicensing of the City of Seattle, Washington’s Boundary Hydroelectric Project No. 2144-038 and the surrender of Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington’s, Sullivan Creek Project No. 2225-015. The Boundary Project is located on the Pend Oreille River in Pend Oreille County, Washington. The Sullivan Creek Project is located on Sullivan Lake, and Sullivan Creek and Outlet Creeks, tributaries to the Pend Oreille River that empty into the Boundary Project reservoir.
  • Institutional Factors Affecting Fish Passage in the Columbia River Treaty Renegotiation

    Institutional Factors Affecting Fish Passage in the Columbia River Treaty Renegotiation

    Water International ISSN: 0250-8060 (Print) 1941-1707 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rwin20 Institutional factors affecting fish passage in the Columbia River Treaty renegotiation Graeme A. Lee Rowlands & Richard A. Wildman To cite this article: Graeme A. Lee Rowlands & Richard A. Wildman (2018): Institutional factors affecting fish passage in the Columbia River Treaty renegotiation, Water International, DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2018.1511200 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1511200 Published online: 10 Sep 2018. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rwin20 WATER INTERNATIONAL https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1511200 RESEARCH ARTICLE Institutional factors affecting fish passage in the Columbia River Treaty renegotiation Graeme A. Lee Rowlandsa and Richard A. Wildmana,b aQuest University Canada, Squamish, Canada; bGeosyntec Consultants, Portland, OR, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The United States and Canada have begun renegotiating the Received 21 April 2017 Columbia River Treaty, which is an international model for trans- Accepted 9 August 2018 fi boundary water governance. This paper identi es six institutional KEYWORDS ff fi factors that will a ect negotiations pertaining to sh passage dur- Dams; fish passage; ing the renegotiation of the treaty: geographical advantage, issue governance; Indigenous linkage, a basin commission, the duration of agreements, negotiat- peoples; salmon; Columbia ing autonomy and side payments. These factors and the methods River Treaty used to determine them can be applied to other transboundary river basins where basin states have a history of transboundary resource governance.
  • The 5Th Annual West Kootenay Glacier Challenge Scotiabank MS Bike Tour!

    The 5Th Annual West Kootenay Glacier Challenge Scotiabank MS Bike Tour!

    The 5th Annual West Kootenay Glacier Challenge Scotiabank MS Bike Tour Courtesy of: Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce 91 Baker Street Nelson B.C. Ph. 250 352 3433 [email protected] discovernelson.com Scotiabank MS Bike Tour August 20-21, 2016 The tour starts in New Denver… Slocan Valley… New Denver- Founded upon the discovery of silver in the mountains adjacent to Slocan Lake in 1891, prospectors from the United States came flooding up to the New Denver region in 1892 to stake their claims, and gather their riches. New Denver quickly grew to a population of 500 people with 50 buildings. In 1895 this growing community built government offices and supply houses for the Silvery Slocan Mines. “A Simple Curve” was filmed in and around the Slocan Valley and was debuted in 2005. The story is of a young man born to war resister parents. War Resisters- In 1976 as many as 14,000 Americans came to the Slocan Valley in an attempt to avoid the Vietnam War. About half of those who made the move were self-proclaimed war resisters, many of whom settled in the Kootenay Region. Nikkei Internment Memorial Centre This exclusive interpretive centre features the Japanese-Canadian internment history of New Denver during the Second World War. The camp is said to have held close to 1500 internees during the war. The memorial centre opened in 1994, which showcases several buildings including the community hall and three restored tar paper shacks with Japanese gardens. A well known Canadian to come out of one of these local institutions is Dr.