Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 1 Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 1 Species requiring In Situ Conservation 36 species Species for which mitigation of threats in the wild may still bring about their successful conservation. Protected Species Threat Mitigation Comments Habitat Barbourula busuangensis Threats are reversible in time frame No Endemic in Busuanga and (Culion?) Coron but they are not present in all sites. They prefer pristine waters and riverine waters (Jakosalem, Afuang, Diesmos), in legally protected areas in Palawan but not really protected (Gonzales), threatened by means of logging, mining but especially water pollution (in Irawan river) since they are restricted in water (Afuang), in question: 'reliably' protected area but here in the Philippines, it is not really applicable. Legally, yes, but not in real context (Gonzales). Structurally unique with nasal parts and eyes on the upper part (Afuang, Gonzales), they have not been successfully bred in captivity. Philippine species not shown to be "lungless", as was previously thought. In recent years this species has been shown to be widespread and common when surveyed by experienced researchers in appropriate habitat (Brown). Ex situ research can be done in Avilon Zoo or UPLB. Research priority is breeding. Unknown if it’s a direct or indirect developer. Nobody knows the life history of this species. Only in Palawan even though it is common in Palawan. Given bureaucratic obstacles to research on Palawan, this and most other Palawan endemics might most appropriately be classified as Data Deficient Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 2 Protected Species Threat Mitigation Comments Habitat Platymantis insulatus Threats are reversible in time frame No Research into availability of founders needs to be prioritised. Maybe gone extinct because of the high threats in the habitat like logging (Jakosalem). Gigantes is not a protected area (Diesmos). Possible reintroduced in mainland limestone in Panay. Tourism, cutting of trees are some the threats in the habitat (Diesmos). Only in one tiny island (Jakosalem). Distribution is very small. This species has survived at high densities and is commonly located (if surveys follow precipitation) at several sites in Gigantes. Species that retreat into limestone crevices have been shown repeatedly to do fine with complete removal of surface vegetation (precisely because they have a place to go when it gets hot an arid). We have made strong statements about limestone species conservation threats in the past and have been incorrect every time. This species requires more field research conducted in the appropriate times of day and year — at least, I would argue, this is necessary before any increased threat level can be justifiably applied. I would consider it Data Deficient until actual surveys are conducted. With only a handful of several- Platymantis spelaeus Threats are reversible in time frame No Limited distribution in Negros (Jakosalem). The area is not protected. Reintroduction is not sure. Limestone is not protected and there is ongoing mining (Diesmos). Burning down of trees for charcoal is rampant in limestone forests of Negros (Jakosalem). Observation in mixed plantation (Jakosalem), protected by insurgencies. Used as flagship species in Negros and limestone forest (Jakosalem). Icon of limestone karst. the species has only been observed and collected on one occasion, so we know nothing of the extent of its range (Brown). Need more Isabela and Cagayan surveys! Recommended to be listed as Critically Endangered because of the habitat destruction (Diesmos). Kaloula baleata Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Research into species validity needs to be prioritised. threats: Palawan mining, can stay in secondary growth. See Blackburn, D. C, C. D. Siler, A. C. Diesmos, J. A. McGuire, D. C. Cannatella, and R. M. Brown. 2013. An adaptive radiation of frogs in a Southeast Asian island archipelago. Evolution 67:2631–2646.; looks like endemic Palawan species (Brown). Common (Brown). Recommended to be listed as Data Deficient, might be species complex/ distribution. Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 3 Protected Species Threat Mitigation Comments Habitat Sanguirana sanguinea Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Common in Palawan, Mainland, can be found in forest areas only. "Mainland" records now known to be in error. This is a Palawan PAIC endemic (Brown). Recommended to be listed as Data Deficient, habitat threats, limited area can be found. Forest areas only. Data Deficient because of bureaucratic obstacles to research on Palawan (Brown). Platymantis bayani Threats are reversible in time frame No Ineffectively protected area for the species (Diesmos). Only recorded once, widespread Samar surveys have not been conducted, impossible to know true range (Brown). We know the limestone species (like insulatus) are most likely OK, even though all forest cover is gone because they retreat into limestone karst and survive very well. Thus, paengi and bayani are even more "buffered" than diesmosi and taylor (Brown). Not yet assessed. Proposed category is Vulnerable. Platymantis biak Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Seen in Dona Remedios Trinidad, Bulacan, still limestone (Sol). Biak na bato is accessible to people (ecotourism) (M. Diesmos). The main threat is habitat destruction not the collection for food (Afuang). Only recorded once, Bulucan surveys have been conducted at two localities only. Impossible to estimate the true range, should be high research priority (Brown). Not yet assessed. Proposed category is Vulnerable. Platymantis diesmosi Threats are reversible in time frame Unknown The protected area has not been pushed through in Mt. Malinao (Gonzalez). Has only been recorded twice; appears to be active in dry season (opposite of most local species). Research priority. We know the limestone species (like insulatus) are most likely OK, even though all forest cover is gone because they retreat into limestone karst and survive very well. Thus, paengi and bayani are even more "buffered" than diesmosi and taylor (Brown). In situ research: verify if it can still be found in Mt. Malinao as well as in other areas (distribution and ecology research). Platymantis lawtoni Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Rampant mining in the area. Species is doing well and we have more data now. Recommended to be listed as Vulnerable, found in Sibuyan, good population. Occurs in good numbers. Also, in well protected area (Diesmos). Platymantis levigatus Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Rampant mining in the area. Species is doing well and we have more data now. Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 4 Protected Species Threat Mitigation Comments Habitat Platymantis panayensis Threats are reversible in time frame No Limited distribution in montane forest (Afuang). Declared as critical area but not yet protected. The habitat is naturally protected because of its high elevation (Diesmos). I honestly do not think we know enough about P. halelae, negrosensis, and panayensis to justify "endangered" (Brown). Suggested to be listed as Vulnerable. Platymantis rabori Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Forest species, cannot tolerate reforestation, found in lowland forest. Strangely patchy distribution. Seems to be associated with primary forest…but not always (Brown). Ingerana mariae Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Found in Palawan. Has been collected on three occasions. Unknown distribution and no extensive research on the area. We know the threats but we don't know how effective the protection has been (Mae). Needs to be classified in family Ceratobatrachidea as per recent phylogenetic studies, AmphibiaWeb, and Amphibian Species of the World. See: Wiens, J. J., J. S. Sukumaran, R. A. Pyron, and R. M. Brown. 2009. Evolutionary and biogeographic origins of high tropical diversity in old world frogs (Ranidae). Evolution 64: 1217–1231. and Bossuyt, F., R. M. Brown, D. M. Hillis, D. C. Cannatella, and M. C. Milinkovitch. 2006. Late Cretaceous diversification resulted in continent-scale regionalism in the cosmopolitan frog family Ranidae. Systematic Biology 55:579–594. Limited information that we have so we can keep as Data Deficient (Diesmos). Limnonectes ferneri Threats are reversible in time frame No Only known from its type locality, and has only been collected once. Threats: logging, mining and being collected as a food source. Not yet assessed. Proposed category is Data Deficient. Limnonectes visayanus Threats are reversible in time frame Yes Some areas are not protected. Occidozyga diminutiva Threats are reversible in time frame Unknown Research into availability of founders needs to be prioritised. Not enough information because of insurgencies. Threats: Habitat loss. Found to be common in S. Zamboanga (Diesmos & Brown, unpubl.). Recommended to be listed as Data Deficient, updated information. Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 5 Protected Species Threat Mitigation Comments Habitat Oreophryne anulata Threats are reversible in time frame Yes I would argue that now that we have surveyed throughout Mindanao and observed Oreophryne everywhere, we are no closer to determining whether this group is a single species, two species (nana on Camiguin, anulata everywhere else) or 5 or 6 species. All the character differences have broken down now that we've seen them from throughout
Recommended publications
  • Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 1
    Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment, Philippines, July 2014 Page 1 Species suited to Conservation Education 42 species Species that are specifically selected for management – primarily in zoos and aquariums - to inspire and increase knowledge in visitors, in order to promote positive behavioural change. For example, when a species is used to raise financial or other support for field conservation projects (this would include clearly defined ‘flagship’ or ‘ambassador’ species). Phylogenetic Cultural/socio-economic Scientific Education Species Biological Distinctiveness significance importance Importance potential Sanguirana everetti 8.659490771 No aspect of biology known to be No No research dependent on this Yes exceptional species Research into availability of founders needs to be prioritised. Known in the area it was first collected like Mt. Apo. Threat: Habitat loss. It is not seen in great numbers anymore in Mindanao and chytrid may already affected them – hard hit (Diesmos). New genetic data suggest that real S. everetti is a SW Mindanao species...not sure what the Apo population would be since it has not be included in a phylogenetic study (Brown). No inferences can be made on the basis of habitat or forest cover. Need actual surveys of populations (Brown). Recommended to be listed as Data Deficient, for its distribution. Data Deficient because no studies can be conducted in that region due to security issues (Brown). Hylarana similis 7.692704126 No aspect of biology known to be No No research dependent on this Yes exceptional species Chytrid infected, effects cannot be reversed in time, high priority, but (Diesmos) they are quiet common on other mountain areas in Luzon, one of the hardest hit frog.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Southeast Asia and Oceania Regional Focus
    November 2011 Vol. 99 www.amphibians.orgFrogLogNews from the herpetological community Regional Focus Maritime Southeast Asia and Oceania INSIDE News from the ASG Regional Updates Global Focus Recent Publications General Announcements And More..... Spotted Treefrog Nyctixalus pictus. Photo: Leong Tzi Ming New The 2012 Sabin Members’ Award for Amphibian Conservation is now Bulletin open for nomination Board FrogLog Vol. 99 | November 2011 | 1 Follow the ASG on facebook www.facebook.com/amphibiansdotor2 | FrogLog Vol. 99| November 2011 g $PSKLELDQ$UN FDOHQGDUVDUHQRZDYDLODEOH 7KHWZHOYHVSHFWDFXODUZLQQLQJSKRWRVIURP $PSKLELDQ$UN¶VLQWHUQDWLRQDODPSKLELDQ SKRWRJUDSK\FRPSHWLWLRQKDYHEHHQLQFOXGHGLQ $PSKLELDQ$UN¶VEHDXWLIXOZDOOFDOHQGDU7KH FDOHQGDUVDUHQRZDYDLODEOHIRUVDOHDQGSURFHHGV DPSKLELDQDUN IURPVDOHVZLOOJRWRZDUGVVDYLQJWKUHDWHQHG :DOOFDOHQGDU DPSKLELDQVSHFLHV 3ULFLQJIRUFDOHQGDUVYDULHVGHSHQGLQJRQ WKHQXPEHURIFDOHQGDUVRUGHUHG±WKHPRUH \RXRUGHUWKHPRUH\RXVDYH2UGHUVRI FDOHQGDUVDUHSULFHGDW86HDFKRUGHUV RIEHWZHHQFDOHQGDUVGURSWKHSULFHWR 86HDFKDQGRUGHUVRIDUHSULFHGDW MXVW86HDFK 7KHVHSULFHVGRQRWLQFOXGH VKLSSLQJ $VZHOODVRUGHULQJFDOHQGDUVIRU\RXUVHOIIULHQGV DQGIDPLO\ZK\QRWSXUFKDVHVRPHFDOHQGDUV IRUUHVDOHWKURXJK\RXU UHWDLORXWOHWVRUIRUJLIWV IRUVWDIIVSRQVRUVRUIRU IXQGUDLVLQJHYHQWV" 2UGHU\RXUFDOHQGDUVIURPRXUZHEVLWH ZZZDPSKLELDQDUNRUJFDOHQGDURUGHUIRUP 5HPHPEHU±DVZHOODVKDYLQJDVSHFWDFXODUFDOHQGDU WRNHHSWUDFNRIDOO\RXULPSRUWDQWGDWHV\RX¶OODOVREH GLUHFWO\KHOSLQJWRVDYHDPSKLELDQVDVDOOSUR¿WVZLOOEH XVHGWRVXSSRUWDPSKLELDQFRQVHUYDWLRQSURMHFWV ZZZDPSKLELDQDUNRUJ FrogLog Vol. 99 | November
    [Show full text]
  • Chec List Amphibians and Reptiles, Romblon Island
    Check List 8(3): 443-462, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Amphibians and Reptiles, Romblon Island Group, central PECIES Philippines: Comprehensive herpetofaunal inventory S OF Cameron D. Siler 1*, John C. Swab 1, Carl H. Oliveros 1, Arvin C. Diesmos 2, Leonardo Averia 3, Angel C. ISTS L Alcala 3 and Rafe M. Brown 1 1 University of Kansas, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Biodiversity Institute, Lawrence, KS 66045-7561, USA. 2 Philippine National Museum, Zoology Division, Herpetology Section. Rizal Park, Burgos St., Manila, Philippines. 3 Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We present results from several recent herpetological surveys in the Romblon Island Group (RIG), Romblon Province, central Philippines. Together with a summary of historical museum records, our data document the occurrence of 55 species of amphibians and reptiles in this small island group. Until the present effort, and despite past studies, observations of evolutionarily distinct amphibian species, including conspicuous, previously known, endemics like the forestherpetological frogs Platymantis diversity lawtoni of the RIGand P.and levigatus their biogeographical and two additional affinities suspected has undescribedremained poorly species understood. of Platymantis We . reportModerate on levels of reptile endemism prevail on these islands, including taxa like the karst forest gecko species Gekko romblon and the newly discovered species G. coi. Although relatively small and less diverse than the surrounding landmasses, the islands of Romblon Province contain remarkable levels of endemism when considered as percentage of the total fauna or per unit landmass area.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Amphibians and Reptiles in Indonesia: Issues and Problems
    Copyright: © 2006 Iskandar and Erdelen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and repro- Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 4(1):60-87. duction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI: 10.1514/journal.arc.0040016 (2329KB PDF) The authors are responsible for the facts presented in this article and for the opinions expressed there- in, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organisation. The authors note that important literature which could not be incorporated into the text has been published follow- ing the drafting of this article. Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Indonesia: issues and problems DJOKO T. ISKANDAR1 * AND WALTER R. ERDELEN2 1School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 10, Jalan Ganesa, Bandung 40132 INDONESIA 2Assistant Director-General for Natural Sciences, UNESCO, 1, rue Miollis, 75732 Paris Cedex 15, FRANCE Abstract.—Indonesia is an archipelagic nation comprising some 17,000 islands of varying sizes and geologi- cal origins, as well as marked differences in composition of their floras and faunas. Indonesia is considered one of the megadiversity centers, both in terms of species numbers as well as endemism. According to the Biodiversity Action Plan for Indonesia, 16% of all amphibian and reptile species occur in Indonesia, a total of over 1,100 species. New research activities, launched in the last few years, indicate that these figures may be significantly higher than generally assumed. Indonesia is suspected to host the worldwide highest numbers of amphibian and reptiles species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Evolution of Phytotelm- Jreeding Anurans
    * ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF PHYTOTELM- JREEDING ANURANS Richard M. Lehtinen Editor MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS I--- - MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 193 Ann Ahr, November, 2004 PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZQOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 192 J. B. BURCII,Editot* Ku1.1: SI.EFANOAND JANICEPAPPAS, Assistant Editoras The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series-the Miscellaneous P~rhlicationsand the Occasional Papers. Both serics were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of thesc series; beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and are numbered. All s~tbmitledmanuscripts to any of the Museum's publications receive external review. The Occasiontrl Papers, begun in 1913, sellie as a mcdium for original studies based prii~cipallyupon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Mi.scelluneous Puhlicutions, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are publislled separately. It is not intended that they bc grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, Insects, Mollusks, and other topics is avail- able. Address inquiries to Publications, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109-1079.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Amphibians and Reptiles: an Overview of Species Diversity, Biogeography, and Conservation
    1 Philippine Amphibians and Reptiles: An Overview of Species Diversity, Biogeography, and Conservation Arvin C. Diesmos, Rafe M. Brown , Angel C. Alcala!, Rogelio V. Sison", Leticia E. Afuang#, and Genevieve V. A. Gee$ Biological Sciences Department, College of Science, De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, 4115 Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines; Section of Integrative Biology and Texas Memorial Museum, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; !Silliman University- Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management, SU Marine Laboratory, 6200 Dumaguete City, Philippines; "Herpetology Section, Zoology Division, Philippine National Museum, Padre Burgos Street, 1000 Manila, Philippines; #Conservation International-Philippines, Philam Homes, 1104 Quezon City, Philippines; $Haribon Foundation, Teachers Village, 1101 Quezon City, Philippines 6he Philippine Archipelago is home to a spec- flat-headed frog (Barbourula busuangensis), a fully tacular and diverse assemblage of amphibians and rep- aquatic species inhabiting unpolluted mountain streams tiles. Situated at the interface between the Oriental and and rivers of Palawan. It is one of the only two known Australian faunal zones, the herpetofauna of this largely species of this genus. Frogs of the genus Platymantis oceanic island archipelago has captured the attention are the most diverse; the number of Philippine species and imagination of systematists and biogeographers for currently stands at 26 but dozens of newly discovered nearly 200 years. Previously thought of as having a species are still awaiting description. depauperate herpetofauna, the Philippine archipelago is now recognized as one of the most important center The fauna includes four species of frogs that have of herpetofaunal diversity in Southeast Asia. Informa- been introduced by man either intentionally (Bufo tion generated from recent field surveys coupled with marinus, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, Rana catesbeiana) analyses of available data on diversity, points to over- or inadvertently (Rana erythraea).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of Biological Resources in the Philippines
    : -.^,rhr:"-i-3'^^=£#?^-j^.r-^a^ Sj2 r:iw0,">::^^'^ \^^' Cfl|*ti-»;;^ THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE PHILIPPINES A RRF'OHT V^Y THK lUCN CONSKRVATION MONITORING CENT:-!E PfcparGd by Roger Cox for the lnLf5rnaLion?.l InsLituLo Cor Knvironment and Development (IIED) February 1988 / fgrMsa^jnt-^'-agyga-- •r-r- ;.«-'> t ^-' isr* 1*.- i^^s. , r^^, ^».|;; ^b-^ ^.*%-^ *i,r^-v . iinnc [ '»/' C'A'. aSM!': Vi - '«.;s^ ; a-* f%h '3;riti7;.:- n'^'ji K ;ii;!'r ' <s:ii.uiy.. viii. K A xo.^ jf^'r;.' 3 10 ciJuJi i\ Ji\{ :::) Jnj:kf- .i. n ( im'.i) •V'lt r'v - -V.-^f~^?fl LP-ife- f^^ s.:.... --11 -^M.jj^^^ riB CC./Sfc^RvAriON .<*TC.rj^. OF EI3U:i' "I.VJ, JbO'TSOURCES ^^a THE PHILIPPlVl'fC ;j^...^..-r'^^ I ilRPOHT BY THK ILCJJ CGJJSIiKVA'ilCN M0N:.V:..):;1NG CKNT ^ Pc'jpas-fjr' ')y Roto* C(/X for the TiKD). {'obruary 1988 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/conservationstat88coxr . 7' CONTENTS List of Figures, Appendices and Tables iii Summary iy Acknowledgements vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 2 METHODS 4 3. FLORA, VEGETATION AND FOREST COVER 3.1 Description of the natural vegetation 4 3.1.1 The forests 4 3.1.2 Other vegetation types 7 3 2 Conservation status of the Philippine flora 8 3.2.1 Introduction 8 3.2.2 Causes of habitat destruction 9 3.2.3 Threatened plant species 11 3. 2. A Centres of plant diversity and endemism 12 4 COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Mangroves 18 4.3 Coral reefs 19 4.4 Seagrass beds 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Amphibians in Thailand
    The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 1(1): 69-82, August 2001 ©2001 by Chulalongkorn University A Checklist of the Amphibians in Thailand WICHASE KHONSUE* AND KUMTHORN THIRAKHUPT Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, THAILAND ABSTRACT.−A checklist of amphibians in Thailand has been compiled based on literature surveys. Specific name and distribution were gathered from many recent publications. The number of amphibians increased substantially from previous reports. The amphibian fauna of Thailand comprises of 130 species, 8 families, and 3 orders. The literatures of amphibian studies in Thailand were also listed for future cited. KEY WORDS: Checklist; Distribution; Amphibian; Thailand; Southeast Asia several articles during 1915-1923 (Smith, 1915; INTRODUCTION 1916a, b, c; 1917a, b, c, d; 1922a, b, c; 1923). In 1917, he listed 52 amphibian species found Distribution pattern of amphibian fauna is to inhabit in Siam (=Thailand) (Smith, mainly affected by rainfall, pattern of 1917a,b,c,d). Later on, some of these species vegetation and geography. Biogeographically, were changed by other authors. During 1957- Thailand is located among 4 types of regions 1958 and 1959-1960, Edward H. Taylor, an including Northeastern montane region in American scientist under the Fullbright northern and western part, Thai-Lao dry scholarship, did thorough field surveys and plateau in northeastern part, Southeast Asian researches on herpetofauna of Thailand. He lowland in central and eastern part, and published “The amphibian fauna of Thailand” Tenasserim and Malay Peninsular in southern in 1962 listing 100 species of amphibian found part of Thailand (Inger, 1999). Peninsular in Thailand (Taylor, 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding in Amphibians: Evolutionary Transformations and Phenotypic Diversity As Drivers of Feeding System Diversity
    Chapter 12 Feeding in Amphibians: Evolutionary Transformations and Phenotypic Diversity as Drivers of Feeding System Diversity Anthony Herrel, James C. O’Reilly, Anne-Claire Fabre, Carla Bardua, Aurélien Lowie, Renaud Boistel and Stanislav N. Gorb Abstract Amphibians are different from most other tetrapods because they have a biphasic life cycle, with larval forms showing a dramatically different cranial anatomy and feeding strategy compared to adults. Amphibians with their exceptional diversity in habitats, lifestyles and reproductive modes are also excellent models for studying the evolutionary divergence in feeding systems. In the present chapter, we review the literature on amphibian feeding anatomy and function published since 2000. We also present some novel unpublished data on caecilian feeding biome- chanics. This review shows that over the past two decades important new insights in our understanding of amphibian feeding anatomy and function have been made possible, thanks to a better understanding of the phylogenetic relationships between taxa, analyses of development and the use of biomechanical modelling. In terms of functional analyses, important advances involve the temperature-dependent nature of tongue projection mechanisms and the plasticity exhibited by animals when switch- A. Herrel (B) Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7179 C.N.R.S/M.N.H.N, 55 rue Buffon, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France e-mail: [email protected] J. C. O’Reilly Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Cleveland Campus, Cleveland, Ohio 334C, USA A.-C. Fabre · C. Bardua Life Sciences Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK A. Lowie Department of Biology Evolutionary, Morphology of Vertebrates, Ghent University, K.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand and Foot Musculature of Anura: Structure, Homology, Terminology, and Synapomorphies for Major Clades
    HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO, MARTÍN O. PEREYRA, TARAN GRANT, AND JULIÁN FAIVOVICH BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina MARTÍN O. PEREYRA División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva “Claudio J. Bidau,” Instituto de Biología Subtropical–CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina TARAN GRANT Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Coleção de Anfíbios, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History JULIÁN FAIVOVICH División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American
    [Show full text]
  • An Estimation of Anuran Species Richness and Abundance in The
    An estimation of anurans species richness and abundance in Sebangau Peat-Swamp Forest, Indonesia, Borneo Joanna Klys 05196662 1 Acknowledgements This research project would not have been possible without the support of many people. Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Caroline Ross, whose encouragement, guidance and support from the initial to the final level enabled me to develop an understanding of the subject. My sincere thanks also goes to, Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project for letting me to undertake research for my undergraduate honours project. In particular, I would like to thank a research assistant Iván Mohedano, for his patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time during project. I would have been lost without him. I would like to thank the staff and volunteers of the Outrop project for providing advice and assistance in data collection. Also I thank all the Indonesian field guides , without whose assistance I would not have been able to carry out my research. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family: my parents, brother and friends for helping me get through the difficult times. 2 Abstract This report presents the results of the effects of selective logging on anurans in the Sebangau forest in East Kalimantan, Borneo. We assessed the patterns of diversity, richness and abundance in anuran’s communities for four sites in the Sebangau forest in East Kalimantan, an important region given the great number of fauna and flora species. The main objective was to assess anurans community factors relative to different degrees of disturbance for the habitats of the Sebangau Catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Natural History of Amphibians and Reptiles in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008)
    BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL HISTORY OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN KERINCI SEBLAT NATIONAL PARK, SUMATRA, INDONESIA (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008) Rhacophorus bifasciatus (Photograpg by H. Kurniati) By : HELLEN KURNIATI Research Center for Biology-LIPI, Widyasatwaloka Building-LIPI, Jalan Raya Cibinong km 46, Cibinong 16911, West Java, INDONESIA Phone : +62-21-8765056 Fax : +62-21-8765068 Email : <[email protected]> and <[email protected]> CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………………………. 5 SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………............................... 6 METHODS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 A. Study Areas and Habitats ………………………………………………………............................... 7 A.1. Phase 1 (January-March 2005) ……………………………………………................................... 8 A.2. Phase 2 (February-March 2006) ………………………………………......................................... 11 A.3. Phase 3 (January-March 2007)…………………………………………….................................... 13 A.4. Phase 4 (February 2008) ................................................................................................................. 15 B. Survey Methods ………………………………………………………………….............................. 16 B.1. Lighting ………………………………………………………………………............................. 17 B.2. Hand Collection ………………………………………………………………............................. 17 B.3. Trapping ………………………………………………………………………............................ 17 C. Analysis ………………………………………………………………………….............................. 18 RESULTS
    [Show full text]