DOCSLIB.ORG

Tanzania 2002/2003 Rukwa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tanzania 2002/2003 Rukwa United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 Volume Vo: REGIONAL REPORT: National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government December 2007 United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 VOLUME Vi: REGIONAL REPORT: RUKWA REGION National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government, Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs – Zanzibar December 2007 TOC i ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents............................................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................ iv Preface............................................................................................................................................................................... v Executive summary......................................................................................................................................................... vi Illustrations..................................................................................................................................................................... xii CENSUS RESULTS AND ANALYSIS PART I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Geographical Location and Boundaries............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Land Area.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Climate............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4.1 Temperature........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4.2 Rainfall................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.5 Population.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.6 Socio-economic Indicators................................................................................................................................ 2 PART II: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The Rationale for Conducting the National Sample Census of Agriculture.................................................... 3 2.2 Census Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Census Coverage and Scope ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Legal Authority of the National Sample Census of Agriculture...................................................................... 5 2.5 Reference Period ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Census Methodology......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.6.1 Census Organization........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6.2 Tabulation Plan................................................................................................................................... 6 2.6.3 Sample Design.................................................................................................................................... 6 2.6.4 Questionnaire Design and Other Census Instruments ....................................................................... 7 2.6.5 Field Pre-Testing of the Census Instruments ..................................................................................... 7 2.6.6 Training of Trainers, Supervisors and Enumerators.......................................................................... 7 2.6.7 Information, Education and Communication (IEC) Campaign......................................................... 7 2.6.8 Household Listing............................................................................................................................... 8 2.6.9 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.6.10 Field Supervision and Consistency Checks ....................................................................................... 8 2.6.11 Data Processing.................................................................................................................................. 8 - Manual Editing.............................................................................................................................. 9 - Data Entry..................................................................................................................................... 9 - Data Structure Formatting ............................................................................................................ 9 - Batch Validation ........................................................................................................................... 9 - Tabulations.................................................................................................................................... 9 - Analysis and Report Preparations ................................................................................................ 9 - Data Quality................................................................................................................................ 10 2.7 Funding Arrangements........................................................................................................................... 10 PART III: CENSUS RESULTS AND ANALYSIS................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Holding Characteristics................................................................................................................................ 11 3.1.1 Type of Holdings.............................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.2 Livelihood Activities/Source of Income .......................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Sex and Age of Heads of Households.............................................................................................. 11 3.1.4 Number of Household Members ...................................................................................................... 15 3.1.5 Level of Education............................................................................................................................ 15 - Literacy ....................................................................................................................................... 15 - Literacy Level for Household Members .................................................................................... 15 - Literacy Rates for Heads of Households.................................................................................... 15 - Educational Status....................................................................................................................... 16 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ Tanzania Agriculture Sample Census TOC ii ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ 3.1.6 Off-farm Income............................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Area of Land Utilised ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Types of Land use............................................................................................................................. 18 3.3 Annual Crops and Vegetable Production..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE Public Disclosure Authorized Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project SRATEGIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Public Disclosure Authorized AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SRESA) This SRESA report was prepared for the Government of Tanzania by Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM) under a contract as part of SAGCOT preparatory activities Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROGRAMMEOVERVIEW 1 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVE 2 1.4 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3 1.5.1 Overview 3 1.5.2 Screening 4 1.5.3 Scoping 4 1.5.4 Baseline Description 4 1.5.5 Scenario Development 4 1.5.6 Impact Assessment 5 1.5.7 Development of Mitigation Measures 5 1.5.8 Consultation 6 1.5.9 Constraints and Limitations 6 1.6 REPORT LAYOUT 6 2 THE SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL GROWTH CORRIDOR OF TANZANIA 8 2.1 THE SAGCOT PROGRAMME 8 2.1.1 The SAGCOT Concept 8 2.1.2 SAGCOT Organisation 11 2.2 PROPOSED WORLD BANK SUPPORTED SAGCOT INVESTMENT PROJECT 14 2.2.1 General 14 2.2.2 Catalytic Fund 15 2.2.3 Support Institutions 16 3 THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN TANZANIA 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 20 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND THE TANZANIAN ECONOMY 20 3.2.1 Overview 20 3.2.2 Land Use 25 3.3 PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR 25 3.3.1 Current Initiatives for Agricultural Development 25 3.3.2 Rationale for SAGCOT Programme 29 3.3.3 District Level Agricultural Planning 30 3.4 FINANCING POLICIES
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Airport
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment July 2008 In Association With : Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2120447 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2120448 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country. The Tanzania Airport Authority has commissioned two companies M/S Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Limited of UK in association with Belva Consult Limited of Tanzania to undertake a Feasibility Study, Detail Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments of seven airports namely Arusha, Bukoba, Kigoma, Tabora, Mafia Island, Shinyanga and Sumbawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • Biofuels, Land Access and Rural Livelihoods in Tanzania
    Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson Series editor: Lorenzo Cotula Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson © IIED, 2009 For copies of this publication, contact IIED. Email: [email protected] IIED Order No: 12560IIED Citation: Sulle, E. and Nelson, F., 2009, BIOFUELS, LAND ACCESS AND RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN TANZANIA, IIED, London. ISBN: 978-1-84369-749-7 All photos by Emmanuel Sulle, 2008 and 2009. Cover photo: Boiling palm oil in the local processing mill in Kigoma Rural District, Tanzania. Design: Smith+Bell (www.smithplusbell.com) Printing: Russell Press (www.russellpress.com) Printed on: Greencoat Velvet 200 gsm and Greencoat Velvet 100 gsm The research findings presented in the report are updated to June 2009. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of IIED. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research report was commissioned by Tanzania Natural Resource Forum’s Forestry Working Group (TFWG) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Funding for the research and for this publication was provided by IIED’s Multidonor Framework Agreement, generously supported by Danida (Denmark), DFID (UK), DGIS (the Netherlands), Irish Aid (Ireland), Norad (Norway), SDC (Switzerland) and Sida (Sweden). Additional funding for the research was kindly provided by IUCN Tanzania as part of its support to the TFWG. We were warmly welcomed by the villagers we visited and many of them had insightful thoughts and observations to share. Thank you to community leaders who generously provided key information on biofuel developments in their villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Tanzania
    WPS8173 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Public Disclosure Authorized Rail Transport and Firm Productivity Evidence from Tanzania Public Disclosure Authorized Atsushi Iimi Richard Martin Humphreys Yonas Eliesikia Mchomvu Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Transport and ICT Global Practice Group August 2017 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Abstract Railway transport generally has the advantage for large-vol- Rail transport is a cost-effective option for firms. How- ume, long-haul freight operations. Africa possesses ever, the study finds that firms’ inventory is costly. This significant railway assets. However, many rail lines are cur- is a disadvantage of using rail transport. Rail operations rently not operational because of the lack of maintenance. are unreliable, adding more inventory costs to firms. The The paper recasts light on the impact of rail transportation implied elasticity of demand for transport services is esti- on firm productivity, using micro data collected in Tanza- mated at −1.01 to −0.52, relatively high in absolute terms. nia. To avoid the endogeneity problem, the instrumental This indicates the rail users’ sensitivity to prices as well as variable technique is used to estimate the impact of rail severity of modal competition against truck transportation. transport. The paper shows that the overall impact of rail The study also finds that firm location matters to the deci- use on firm costs is significant despite that the rail unit sion to use rail services. Proximity to rail infrastructure rates are set lower when the shipping distance is longer. is important for firms to take advantage of rail benefits. This paper is a product of the Transport and ICT Global Practice Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research
    RESEARCH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES ON LAKE GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/Ol(En) TANGANYIKA GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/01 (En) January 1992 TOWARDS A REGIONAL INFORMATION BASE FOR LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH by J. Eric Reynolds FINNISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bujumbura, January 1992 The conclusions and recommendations given in this and other reports in the Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika Project series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or FINNIDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. PREFACE The Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika project (Tanganyika Research) became fully operational in January 1992. It is executed by the Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by the Finnish International Development Agency (FINNIDA). This project aims at the determination of the biological basis for fish production on Lake Tanganyika, in order to permit the formulation of a coherent lake-wide fisheries management policy for the four riparian States (Burundi, Tanzania, Zaïre and Zambia). Particular attention will be also given to the reinforcement of the skills and physical facilities of the fisheries research units in all four beneficiary countries as well as to the buildup of effective coordination mechanisms to ensure full collaboration between the Governments concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ends of the Indian Ocean: Tracing Coastlines in the Tanzanian "Hinterland"
    The Ends of the Indian Ocean: Tracing Coastlines in the Tanzanian "Hinterland" Julia Verne History in Africa, Volume 46, 2019, pp. 359-383 (Article) Published by Cambridge University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/727065 [ Access provided at 26 Sep 2021 12:35 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Bridging Histories of East and Central Africa The Ends of the Indian Ocean: Tracing Coastlines in the Tanzanian “Hinterland” Julia Verne Abstract: In recent years, several attempts to revitalize Area Studies have concen- trated on oceans as the unifying force to create regions. In this respect, the Indian Ocean has become a prime example to show how economic as well as cultural flows across the sea have contributed to close connections between its shores. However, by doing so, they not only seem to create a certain, rather homogeneous, Indian Ocean space, they often also lead to a conceptual separation between “coast” and “hinterland,” similar to earlier distinctions between “African/Arab” or “East/Central Africa.” In this contribution, so-called “Arab” traders who settled along trade routes connecting the East African coast to its hinterland will serve as an empirical ground to explore and challenge these boundaries. Tracing maritime imaginaries and related materialities in the Tanzanian interior, it will reflect on the ends of the Indian Ocean and the nature of such maritime conceptualizations of space more generally. By taking the relational thinking that lies at the ground of maritimity inland, it wishes to encourage a re-conceptualization of areas that not only replaces a terrestrial spatial entity with a maritime one, but that genuinely breaks with such “container-thinking” and, instead, foregrounds the meandering, fluid character of regions and their complex and highly dynamic entanglements.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania MFR Summary Report
    TANZANIA August 20, 2018 Market Fundamentals Summary KEY MESSAGES The objective of this report is to document the basic market context Figure 1. Map of Tanzania for staple food and livestock production and marketing in Tanzania. The information presented is based on desk research, a field assessment using rapid rural appraisal techniques, and a consultation workshop with stakehoders in Tanzania. Findings from this report will inform regular market monitoring and analysis in Tanzania. Maize, rice, sorghum, millet, pulses (beans and peas), cassava and bananas (plantains) are the main staple foods in Tanzania. Maize is the most widely consumed staple in Tanzania and the country imports significant quantities of wheat to meet local demand for wheat flour. Consumption of other staples varies across the country based on local supply and demand dynamics. Cattle, goat and sheep are the major sources of red meat consumed in Tanzania. Tanzania’s cropping calendar follows two distinct seasonal patterns. The Msimu season covers unimodal rainfall areas in the south, west and central parts of the country while the Masika and Vuli seasons Source: FEWS NET (2018). cover bi-modal rainfall areas in the north and eastern parts of the country (Figure 5). Figure 2. Tanzania’s average self sufficiency status for key staple foods (2014/15 – 2017/18) As a member of the East Africa Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Tanzania plays an important role in regional staple food trade across East and Southern Africa (Annex III). The country is generally a surplus producer of staple cereals and pulses, and exports significant quantities of these commodities to neighboring countries in East and Southern Africa inlcuding Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratice Republic of Congo (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Tectonic Activity and Lake Level Change in the Rukwa Rift Basin
    Journal of African Earth Sciences, Vol. 26. No.3. pp. 397-421, 1998 c 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd Pergamon All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII:S0899-5362(98)00023-2 0899-5362/98 $19.00 + 000 Late Quaternary tectonic activity and lake level change in the Rukwa Rift Basin D. DELVAUX,1 F. KERVYN,l E. VITTORI,2 R. S. A. KAJARN and E. KILEMBE4 1Royal Museum for Central Africa, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium 2ANPA, Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48, 00144 Roma, Italy 3MADINI, Box 903 Dodoma, Tanzania 4TPDC, Exploration-Production, Box 2774 Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania Abstract-Interpretation of remotely sensed images and air photographs, compilation of geological and topographical maps, morphostructural and fault kinematic observations and 14C dating reveal that, besides obvious climatic influences, the lake water extent and sedimentation in the closed hydrological system of Lake Rukwa is strongly influenced by tectonic processes. A series of sandy ridges, palaeolacustrine terraces and palaeounderwater delta fans are related to an Early Holocene high lake level and subsequent progressive lowering. The maximum lake level was controlled by the altitude of the watershed between the Rukwa and Tanganyika hydrological systems. Taking as reference the present elevation of the palaeolacustrine terraces around Lake Rukwa, two orders of vertical tectonic movement are evidenced: i) a general uplift centred on the Rungwe Volcanic Province between the Rukwa and Malawi Rift Basins; and ii) a tectonic northeastward tilting of the entire Rukwa Rift Basin, including the depression and rift shoulders. This is supported by the observed hydromorphological evolution. Local uplift is also induced by the development of an active fault zone in the central part of the depression, in a prolongation of the Mbeya Range-Galula Fault system.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Floods 23 January 2008
    DREF operation n° MDRTZ006 GLIDE n° FL-2008-000011-TZA Tanzania: Floods 23 January 2008 The International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of national societies to respond to disasters. CHF 88,353 (USD 81,012 or EUR 55,648) has been allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the Tanzania Red Cross National Society (TNRCS) in assisting some 7,500 affected people in Tanzania floods. Summary: Areas of western, southwest and parts of the coastal province of Tanzania (Rukwa, Kigoma, Ruvuma, Pwani) have been receiving seasonal rains normal to above normal. Heavy downpours have been reported in Sumbawanga municipal in Rukwa region where three suburbs of Izia, Katandala and Sumbawanga are the most affected. Assessment reports have indicated that a total of 1,117 families are in need of assistance in basic items to sustain their living; blankets, water buckets, insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), laundry soap and construction items to the most vulnerable families including women-headed families and people living with HIV (PLWHIV). This operation is expected to be implemented over 3 month, and will therefore be completed by 18 April, 2008; a Final Report will be made available three months after the end of the operation. <click here for the DREF budget, here for contact details, or here to view the map of the affected area> The situation Areas of western, coastal and southwest of Tanzania such as Rukwa, Kigoma, Ruvuma, Pwani have recently experienced heavy rains.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Forest Products to Rural Livelihoods in Nkasi District, Rukwa, Tanzania
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST PRODUCTS TO RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN NKASI DISTRICT, RUKWA, TANZANIA BY ANSBERT SEVERIN RWAMAHE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE OF SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, MOROGORO, TANZANIA. 2008 i ABSTRACT This study was conducted in Nkasi District, Rukwa region, Tanzania, with the overall objective of assessing the contribution of forest resources in improving the livelihoods of rural communities. The focus was on various ways in which local communities in the study area earn income through forest resources. Similarly, the study focused on the types and quantities of the forest products and establishment of the contribution of the products to household income. Primary data were collected from household survey in the study area by using questionnaire, PRA techniques and check list for key informants. Data collected during PRA were analysed with the help of local community. Content and structural- functional analysis techniques were applied for qualitative data and information. The quantitative data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) programme. The secondary data were obtained from the District Natural Resources Office. The results show that indigenous forests provide various types of forest products with substantial contribution to the livelihoods of the household. The forest products comprise about 21% of the total annual household cash income. Likewise, the study quantified the annually utilized forest products per household to be around TAS 186 815. The study also identified endangered plant species orchids which is widely traded and consumed by about 63% of the sampled households.
    [Show full text]